Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100226
Simone Pelaracci, Luisa Paolotti, Lucia Rocchi, Antonio Boggia, Cesare Castellini
According to FAO projections, meat and fish production will have to increase by 70% by 2050 to meet the needs of the growing global population and its protein requirements. The poultry sector has been one of the most responsive industries to the growing demand for protein, with a significant increase in egg and chicken meat production. Although eggs are important foods in the human diet, environmental impacts and ethical aspects could also affect dietary choices. This study aimed to assess the environmental impacts of egg production, by using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). More specifically, the study compared two different farming systems of conventional and organic egg production, with reference to two case studies in northern Italy. The results obtainedgenerally showed the conventional system to be more efficient compared to the organic system. For example, as regards the impact category of Fine particulate matter formation, the conventional system had a 28.6% lower impact than the organic system. Another major difference was in the Land use category, where the conventional system had an impact of 48.5% less than the organic system. The Organic Scenario showed some critical aspects, e.g. the need for a large agricultural area, low feed conversion rates and low crop yields. The two production scenarios showed that in terms of environmental impact, the main difference between organic and conventional egg production resides in feed production. I It is, therefore, essential to work on a low input formula, to substitutethe diet components with the greatest impact and adopt strategies to obtain an increase in yields and/or a reduction in resource consumption during the cultivation phase. The complete substitution of soybean with other local crops could reduce several impacts, including the one linked to transport. The further reduction of maize could also limit the expected impact.
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of organic and conventional egg production: A case study in northern Italy","authors":"Simone Pelaracci, Luisa Paolotti, Lucia Rocchi, Antonio Boggia, Cesare Castellini","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100226","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100226","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to FAO projections, meat and fish production will have to increase by 70% by 2050 to meet the needs of the growing global population and its protein requirements. The poultry sector has been one of the most responsive industries to the growing demand for protein, with a significant increase in egg and chicken meat production. Although eggs are important foods in the human diet, environmental impacts and ethical aspects could also affect dietary choices. This study aimed to assess the environmental impacts of egg production, by using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). More specifically, the study compared two different farming systems of conventional and organic egg production, with reference to two case studies in northern Italy. The results obtainedgenerally showed the conventional system to be more efficient compared to the organic system. For example, as regards the impact category of Fine particulate matter formation, the conventional system had a 28.6% lower impact than the organic system. Another major difference was in the Land use category, where the conventional system had an impact of 48.5% less than the organic system. The Organic Scenario showed some critical aspects, e.g. the need for a large agricultural area, low feed conversion rates and low crop yields. The two production scenarios showed that in terms of environmental impact, the main difference between organic and conventional egg production resides in feed production. I It is, therefore, essential to work on a low input formula, to substitutethe diet components with the greatest impact and adopt strategies to obtain an increase in yields and/or a reduction in resource consumption during the cultivation phase. The complete substitution of soybean with other local crops could reduce several impacts, including the one linked to transport. The further reduction of maize could also limit the expected impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100226"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000643/pdfft?md5=77ab16562a70423cb7382c9b1de74a0c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000643-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100223
Rahul Aggarwal
Student restaurants at Chalmers University have adopted take-away lunch boxes as a convenient dining option for students with disposable single-use containers being the norm. However, there is a growing interest in more sustainable, reusable alternatives. This study conducted a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to assess the potential environmental and economic impacts of using reusable lunch boxes in comparison to disposable ones, considering 18 environmental impact categories. The functional unit chosen for evaluation was the provision of takeaway lunches to Chalmers students over the course of a year. The findings revealed that reusable boxes with 20 uses outperformed their disposable counterparts in many environmental impacts, reducing the climate change impact by 59%. However, water and energy consumption were higher for the reusable option by 99% and 62% respectively, primarily due to the cleaning process. From an economic perspective, reusable boxes proved to be 3.3% more costly than disposable ones. In conclusion, this study highlights the benefits of reusable solutions, showing reductions in various environmental footprints but presenting slightly higher economic footprints over 20 uses. However, as the number of uses increases, the advantages also increase, leading to recommendations for better management of the lunch boxes to maximize their reusable potential.
{"title":"Comparative life cycle assessment of reusable and single use take-away lunch boxes used in student restaurants","authors":"Rahul Aggarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100223","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100223","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Student restaurants at Chalmers University have adopted take-away lunch boxes as a convenient dining option for students with disposable single-use containers being the norm. However, there is a growing interest in more sustainable, reusable alternatives. This study conducted a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to assess the potential environmental and economic impacts of using reusable lunch boxes in comparison to disposable ones, considering 18 environmental impact categories. The functional unit chosen for evaluation was the provision of takeaway lunches to Chalmers students over the course of a year. The findings revealed that reusable boxes with 20 uses outperformed their disposable counterparts in many environmental impacts, reducing the climate change impact by 59%. However, water and energy consumption were higher for the reusable option by 99% and 62% respectively, primarily due to the cleaning process. From an economic perspective, reusable boxes proved to be 3.3% more costly than disposable ones. In conclusion, this study highlights the benefits of reusable solutions, showing reductions in various environmental footprints but presenting slightly higher economic footprints over 20 uses. However, as the number of uses increases, the advantages also increase, leading to recommendations for better management of the lunch boxes to maximize their reusable potential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000618/pdfft?md5=6b20e63933ea12341812f4e34ff6273b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000618-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100220
Diorbhail Wentworth , Alfred Gathorne-Hardy , Priyanka Jamwal , Kate Heal
Phosphorus is a finite resource that is in high demand due to its essential role as a fertiliser. We undertook a substance flow analysis of phosphorus for India's agri-food system to identify where the biggest losses of phosphorus occur and which flows could be targeted to move phosphorus from a linear use and waste approach to a circular approach encompassing recovery and re-use. A novel aspect of the analysis was the inclusion of sanitation systems in India. National phosphorus flows were calculated annually for the five years 2015–2019, and the mean was then used to provide a representative annual flow. The analysis showed that India is dependent on imports for 95% of applied mineral phosphorus fertiliser and has a low phosphorus-use efficiency of 32%. The largest recoverable flow is human excreta (urine and faeces), equivalent to 21% of the current phosphorus applied in mineral fertiliser in India. Phosphorus recovery from septic tanks, the most prevalent sanitation system in India, could alone replace 8% of phosphorus applied in mineral fertiliser in India. Alongside the ongoing development of sanitation systems in India this provides an opportunity to ensure that nutrient recovery is included in sanitation developments.
{"title":"Phosphorus recovery potential revealed by substance flow analysis of the Indian food, agricultural and sanitation system","authors":"Diorbhail Wentworth , Alfred Gathorne-Hardy , Priyanka Jamwal , Kate Heal","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100220","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100220","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Phosphorus is a finite resource that is in high demand due to its essential role as a fertiliser. We undertook a substance flow analysis of phosphorus for India's agri-food system to identify where the biggest losses of phosphorus occur and which flows could be targeted to move phosphorus from a linear use and waste approach to a circular approach encompassing recovery and re-use. A novel aspect of the analysis was the inclusion of sanitation systems in India. National phosphorus flows were calculated annually for the five years 2015–2019, and the mean was then used to provide a representative annual flow. The analysis showed that India is dependent on imports for 95% of applied mineral phosphorus fertiliser and has a low phosphorus-use efficiency of 32%. The largest recoverable flow is human excreta (urine and faeces), equivalent to 21% of the current phosphorus applied in mineral fertiliser in India. Phosphorus recovery from septic tanks, the most prevalent sanitation system in India, could alone replace 8% of phosphorus applied in mineral fertiliser in India. Alongside the ongoing development of sanitation systems in India this provides an opportunity to ensure that nutrient recovery is included in sanitation developments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000588/pdfft?md5=88c6b44a9615c103502af7f995c6c885&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000588-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100222
Ryota Kodate , Ryu Ukawa-Sato , Haoqi Wang , Xiaotao Bi , Chihiro Fushimi
We evaluated CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and minimum selling price of levulinic acid (LA) produced in two biomass-waste-based processes: the AlCl3/choline chloride (ChCl) process, and the formic acid (FA) process, with catalysts recycling. Six scenarios were synthesized to compare the performances of the two processes in Japan and Canada. In the AlCl3/ChCl process, the total GHG emission was 11.35–11.56 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA and those from the energy input to the pretreatment and ChCl production were 5.22 and 3.90 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA, respectively. In the FA process, the total GHG emission was 9.46–9.68 and 22.29–22.51 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA for 60 wt% and 80 wt% FA, respectively. The operational emissions for makeup FA input were 7.65 and 20.80 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA (60 wt% and 80 wt%, respectively), which accounted for more than 80% in all scenarios. The optimization of the product purge volume, FA concentration in the pretreatment, and FA production using biomass and/or renewable energy are critical parameters to reduce overall environmental impacts of the processes. The liquid content of the solid residue (moisture, water soluble organic matters, and catalyst) had insignificant influences on the GHG emission and minimum selling price. In the FA process, combustion of solid residue can compensate the GHG emissions from the reaction and separation units.
我们评估了两种基于生物质废弃物的工艺:氯化铝/氯化胆碱(ChCl)工艺和甲酸(FA)工艺生产的乙酰丙酸(LA)的二氧化碳当量(CO2eq)温室气体(GHG)排放量和最低销售价格,其中甲酸(FA)工艺的催化剂可回收利用。为了比较这两种工艺在日本和加拿大的性能,我们合成了六种方案。在 AlCl3/ChCl 工艺中,温室气体总排放量为 11.35-11.56 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA,预处理和 ChCl 生产的能源输入排放量分别为 5.22 和 3.90 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA。在 FA 过程中,60 wt% 和 80 wt% FA 的温室气体排放总量分别为 9.46-9.68 和 22.29-22.51 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA。合成 FA 输入的运行排放量分别为 7.65 和 20.80 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA(60 wt% 和 80 wt%),在所有方案中均占 80% 以上。优化产品净化量、预处理中的 FA 浓度以及使用生物质和/或可再生能源生产 FA 是减少工艺对环境总体影响的关键参数。固体残留物的液体含量(水分、水溶性有机物和催化剂)对温室气体排放和最低销售价格的影响不大。在 FA 工艺中,固体残渣的燃烧可以补偿反应和分离单元的温室气体排放。
{"title":"Life cycle GHG emissions and economic viability of two levulinic acid production processes from biomass: A case study of Japan and Canada","authors":"Ryota Kodate , Ryu Ukawa-Sato , Haoqi Wang , Xiaotao Bi , Chihiro Fushimi","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100222","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100222","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We evaluated CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and minimum selling price of levulinic acid (LA) produced in two biomass-waste-based processes: the AlCl<sub>3</sub>/choline chloride (ChCl) process, and the formic acid (FA) process, with catalysts recycling. Six scenarios were synthesized to compare the performances of the two processes in Japan and Canada. In the AlCl<sub>3</sub>/ChCl process, the total GHG emission was 11.35–11.56 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg-LA and those from the energy input to the pretreatment and ChCl production were 5.22 and 3.90 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg-LA, respectively. In the FA process, the total GHG emission was 9.46–9.68 and 22.29–22.51 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg-LA for 60 wt% and 80 wt% FA, respectively. The operational emissions for makeup FA input were 7.65 and 20.80 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg-LA (60 wt% and 80 wt%, respectively), which accounted for more than 80% in all scenarios. The optimization of the product purge volume, FA concentration in the pretreatment, and FA production using biomass and/or renewable energy are critical parameters to reduce overall environmental impacts of the processes. The liquid content of the solid residue (moisture, water soluble organic matters, and catalyst) had insignificant influences on the GHG emission and minimum selling price. In the FA process, combustion of solid residue can compensate the GHG emissions from the reaction and separation units.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100222"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000606/pdfft?md5=479e258e72ca322ea8144f5c2d307e3a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000606-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142130223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100221
Nicolás Martínez-Ramón , Fernando Calvo-Rodríguez , Diego Iribarren , Javier Dufour
In the face of escalating emission reduction demands and heightened public awareness, the imperative for transparent assessments is fundamental to responsible and sustainable development. The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) is instrumental in identifying environmental hotspots in intricate systems and guiding the design and selection of environmentally conscious production methods. However, LCA's comprehensive approach demands substantial data, fundamentally material and energy flows for individual materials or processes, consolidated within a life cycle inventory (LCI). The amount of time, resources, and expertise required to compile an accurate LCI dataset are among the greatest concerns for LCA practitioners. During the early design phase for industrial-scale production, process simulation is a useful tool for estimating LCI data; however, first-principle models can sometimes be unfeasible. This has prompted researchers and engineers to advocate for simplified or surrogate versions of these intricate models in some particular cases. In contrast to first-principle models, machine learning (ML) models efficiently manage extensive datasets and complex systems without rigorous model equations. This work assesses the current state of ML-LCA integration through literature and bibliometric analysis, categorizing works into three clusters and identifying publication trends. Furthermore, this analysis yielded three frameworks aimed at facilitating the integration of ML techniques into LCA workflows, enhancing precision and efficiency in environmental impact assessment. The first framework revealed the interest in abstracting a complete process into a surrogate ML model for fast LCI predictions. Conversely, the second one focused on substituting a complex part of the process for an ML surrogate model based on data from experiments or literature. Finally, in the third framework, LCA performance was directly correlated with a system characteristic, enabling direct and fast predictions of LCIs or LCA performance indicators, and optimization in not yet designed systems.
面对不断提高的减排要求和公众意识,透明的评估是负责任和可持续发展的基础。使用生命周期评估(LCA)有助于在错综复杂的系统中发现环境热点,并指导设计和选择具有环保意识的生产方法。然而,生命周期评估的综合方法需要大量数据,主要是在生命周期清单(LCI)中整合单个材料或工艺的材料流和能源流。编制准确的 LCI 数据集所需的时间、资源和专业知识是 LCA 从业人员最关心的问题之一。在工业规模生产的早期设计阶段,流程模拟是估算 LCI 数据的有用工具;然而,第一原理模型有时并不可行。这就促使研究人员和工程师在某些特殊情况下主张使用这些复杂模型的简化版或替代版。与第一原理模型相比,机器学习(ML)模型无需严格的模型方程,就能有效管理大量数据集和复杂系统。这项工作通过文献和文献计量分析评估了 ML-LCA 整合的现状,将作品分为三类,并确定了出版趋势。此外,该分析还得出了三个框架,旨在促进将 ML 技术集成到 LCA 工作流程中,提高环境影响评估的精度和效率。第一个框架揭示了将一个完整的过程抽象为一个代用 ML 模型以进行快速 LCI 预测的兴趣所在。与此相反,第二个框架侧重于根据实验或文献数据,用 ML 代用模型替代流程中的复杂部分。最后,在第三个框架中,生命周期评估性能与系统特性直接相关,可以直接快速地预测生命周期影响指数或生命周期评估性能指标,并对尚未设计的系统进行优化。
{"title":"Frameworks for the application of machine learning in life cycle assessment for process modeling","authors":"Nicolás Martínez-Ramón , Fernando Calvo-Rodríguez , Diego Iribarren , Javier Dufour","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100221","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100221","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the face of escalating emission reduction demands and heightened public awareness, the imperative for transparent assessments is fundamental to responsible and sustainable development. The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) is instrumental in identifying environmental hotspots in intricate systems and guiding the design and selection of environmentally conscious production methods. However, LCA's comprehensive approach demands substantial data, fundamentally material and energy flows for individual materials or processes, consolidated within a life cycle inventory (LCI). The amount of time, resources, and expertise required to compile an accurate LCI dataset are among the greatest concerns for LCA practitioners. During the early design phase for industrial-scale production, process simulation is a useful tool for estimating LCI data; however, first-principle models can sometimes be unfeasible. This has prompted researchers and engineers to advocate for simplified or surrogate versions of these intricate models in some particular cases. In contrast to first-principle models, machine learning (ML) models efficiently manage extensive datasets and complex systems without rigorous model equations. This work assesses the current state of ML-LCA integration through literature and bibliometric analysis, categorizing works into three clusters and identifying publication trends. Furthermore, this analysis yielded three frameworks aimed at facilitating the integration of ML techniques into LCA workflows, enhancing precision and efficiency in environmental impact assessment. The first framework revealed the interest in abstracting a complete process into a surrogate ML model for fast LCI predictions. Conversely, the second one focused on substituting a complex part of the process for an ML surrogate model based on data from experiments or literature. Finally, in the third framework, LCA performance was directly correlated with a system characteristic, enabling direct and fast predictions of LCIs or LCA performance indicators, and optimization in not yet designed systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266678942400059X/pdfft?md5=31344a8562ec3679d3f09265e351ceec&pid=1-s2.0-S266678942400059X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142077113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-12DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100219
M. Amritha Gunawardena, Erandathie Lokupitiya
The pros and cons of the organic and conventional systems of pineapple cultivation have not been studied extensively. Non-consideration of full crop cycle and non-incorporation of environmental externalities are among the other gaps in research. The present study therefore compared Conventional Cultivation System (CCS) and Organic Cultivation System (OCS) of pineapple grown in Sri Lanka using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) under five impact categories considering system boundary from gate-to-gate and the full crop cycle. Economic analysis was conducted to determine the best system considering positive and negative externalities. Results showed 87% reduction of Global Warming Potential and 89% reduction of Eutrophication Potential under OCS. Higher toxicity potentials were reported under CCS while OCS resulted in zero toxicity. The net benefit for the farmer under OCS was higher. When the externalities were incorporated, the OCS showed a net gain of USD 8208 per ha while the CCS was no longer beneficial (USD -21,162 per ha). The study proposes economic instruments to incentivise farmers and emphasises the need to minimise adverse impacts of pesticides in sensitive locations. The study also highlights the potential of LCA studies when coupled with monetary values in guiding policy to incentivise farmers towards sustainable pineapple production.
{"title":"Comparison of conventionally and organically grown pineapple in Sri Lanka: An integrative approach applying life cycle assessment and externalities","authors":"M. Amritha Gunawardena, Erandathie Lokupitiya","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100219","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100219","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The pros and cons of the organic and conventional systems of pineapple cultivation have not been studied extensively. Non-consideration of full crop cycle and non-incorporation of environmental externalities are among the other gaps in research. The present study therefore compared Conventional Cultivation System (CCS) and Organic Cultivation System (OCS) of pineapple grown in Sri Lanka using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) under five impact categories considering system boundary from gate-to-gate and the full crop cycle. Economic analysis was conducted to determine the best system considering positive and negative externalities. Results showed 87% reduction of Global Warming Potential and 89% reduction of Eutrophication Potential under OCS. Higher toxicity potentials were reported under CCS while OCS resulted in zero toxicity. The net benefit for the farmer under OCS was higher. When the externalities were incorporated, the OCS showed a net gain of USD 8208 per ha while the CCS was no longer beneficial (USD -21,162 per ha). The study proposes economic instruments to incentivise farmers and emphasises the need to minimise adverse impacts of pesticides in sensitive locations. The study also highlights the potential of LCA studies when coupled with monetary values in guiding policy to incentivise farmers towards sustainable pineapple production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000576/pdfft?md5=1f8ce56a81a9190ab4fe6b815180c9a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000576-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142002175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-08DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100218
Atacan Ketenci, Matthias Wolf
The manufacturing industry increasingly needs to shift toward energy-efficient production patterns to address both environmental pollution reduction and higher energy prices. Despite efforts to enhance energy efficiency and to close the energy efficiency gap in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) limited awareness, lack of know-how, and restricted financial and human resources still hinder large-scale adoption. This is partly because current research on energy flow analysis (EFA) often lacks structured and detailed methodologies and neglects a suitable evaluation of potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. In response, we derived a framework from existing literature and applied action research to tailor it to identify energy flows and cost-effective reduction potentials for GHG emissions in SMEs. The framework aims to improve awareness, transparency, and decision-making regarding energy consumption and environmental protection within SMEs by combining GHG accounting with comprehensive EFA to enhance energy efficiency. Furthermore, the framework outlines specific activities to guide SMEs through the implementation process. Two case studies were conducted in partnership with companies operating in the automotive and environmental sectors to develop and validate the framework. Although the case studies focused on non-energy-intensive industries, they revealed untapped potential for reducing energy consumption. Both case studies showed reductions in energy use through the identified measures, achieving reductions of 900,000 kWh and 1,300,000 kWh, respectively. At 2021 energy price levels, these reductions led to a significant drop in energy costs: a 16% drop in case one and 22% in case two. Additionally, insights from the case studies have led to further refinements of the framework, emphasizing the necessity of tailored solutions and resource considerations for SMEs. These findings helped to identify opportunities for future research directions toward optimizing energy management practices in SMEs.
{"title":"Advancing energy efficiency in SMEs: A case study-based framework for non-energy-intensive manufacturing companies","authors":"Atacan Ketenci, Matthias Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100218","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100218","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The manufacturing industry increasingly needs to shift toward energy-efficient production patterns to address both environmental pollution reduction and higher energy prices. Despite efforts to enhance energy efficiency and to close the energy efficiency gap in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) limited awareness, lack of know-how, and restricted financial and human resources still hinder large-scale adoption. This is partly because current research on energy flow analysis (EFA) often lacks structured and detailed methodologies and neglects a suitable evaluation of potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. In response, we derived a framework from existing literature and applied action research to tailor it to identify energy flows and cost-effective reduction potentials for GHG emissions in SMEs. The framework aims to improve awareness, transparency, and decision-making regarding energy consumption and environmental protection within SMEs by combining GHG accounting with comprehensive EFA to enhance energy efficiency. Furthermore, the framework outlines specific activities to guide SMEs through the implementation process. Two case studies were conducted in partnership with companies operating in the automotive and environmental sectors to develop and validate the framework. Although the case studies focused on non-energy-intensive industries, they revealed untapped potential for reducing energy consumption. Both case studies showed reductions in energy use through the identified measures, achieving reductions of 900,000 kWh and 1,300,000 kWh, respectively. At 2021 energy price levels, these reductions led to a significant drop in energy costs: a 16% drop in case one and 22% in case two. Additionally, insights from the case studies have led to further refinements of the framework, emphasizing the necessity of tailored solutions and resource considerations for SMEs. These findings helped to identify opportunities for future research directions toward optimizing energy management practices in SMEs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100218"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000564/pdfft?md5=14a02a5564be090e7a36342e539d983d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000564-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100217
Aristotle T. Ubando , Jeremias A. Gonzaga , Ivan Henderson V. Gue , Jose Bienvenido Manuel Biona
Plastic waste mismanagement is a pertinent environmental concern among developing countries. The Philippines has a significant plastic waste concern as the country is among the top emitters of plastic wastes to the ocean. To manage plastic wastes, the government enacted policies. resulting to paper carrying bags becoming a prominent alternative. Switching from one carrying bag to another, however, requires clear assessment on the environmental implications as environmental trade-offs can occur. To provide the needed clarity, this study assessed the environmental implications of plastic and paper carrying bags through a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. This study developed a model with the novelty of a) supply chain integration, b) augmented Environmental Design of Industrial Products (EDIP) impact assessment, and c) inventory categorization. From the augmented EDIP assessment, paper carrying bags had a single score impact of 0.73 whereas plastic carrying bags had a single score of 0.63. In terms of geographic emissions, this work revealed that paper carrying bags emit 50.28% of its emissions outside the country whereas plastic carrying bag emit 34.72%. Policy recommendations derived from the findings are provided in this paper. Recommendations include carbon capture and storage, green procurement, circular management, and waste management system improvement. Policy makers may infer from the recommendations in managing environmental issues from the use of carrying bags.
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of plastic and paper carrying bags in the Philippines","authors":"Aristotle T. Ubando , Jeremias A. Gonzaga , Ivan Henderson V. Gue , Jose Bienvenido Manuel Biona","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100217","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100217","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plastic waste mismanagement is a pertinent environmental concern among developing countries. The Philippines has a significant plastic waste concern as the country is among the top emitters of plastic wastes to the ocean. To manage plastic wastes, the government enacted policies. resulting to paper carrying bags becoming a prominent alternative. Switching from one carrying bag to another, however, requires clear assessment on the environmental implications as environmental trade-offs can occur. To provide the needed clarity, this study assessed the environmental implications of plastic and paper carrying bags through a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. This study developed a model with the novelty of a) supply chain integration, b) augmented Environmental Design of Industrial Products (EDIP) impact assessment, and c) inventory categorization. From the augmented EDIP assessment, paper carrying bags had a single score impact of 0.73 whereas plastic carrying bags had a single score of 0.63. In terms of geographic emissions, this work revealed that paper carrying bags emit 50.28% of its emissions outside the country whereas plastic carrying bag emit 34.72%. Policy recommendations derived from the findings are provided in this paper. Recommendations include carbon capture and storage, green procurement, circular management, and waste management system improvement. Policy makers may infer from the recommendations in managing environmental issues from the use of carrying bags.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100217"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000552/pdfft?md5=dcc10a7ff298770bdaeb7dc605167add&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000552-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141979393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100216
Lena Jarosch, Vanessa Bach, Matthias Finkbeiner
Dog food accounts for 90% of the average dog's impact on climate change. Vegan dog food is one possible alternative. There are few studies evaluating its environmental impacts. The goals of this paper are to i) determine the environmental impacts and hotspots of wet vegan dog food, ii) compare results with average meat-based alternative and estimate global climate change potential of switching from meat-based to vegan dog food diet. A life cycle assessment was performed for a can of vegan dog food for the categories climate change, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, smog, and land use. Each can had a carbon footprint of 0.4 kg CO2-eq., adding up to 443 kg CO2-eq over a dog's 15-year lifespan. A comparison with meat-based dog food showed reduction potentials in acidification by 50%, climate change by 37%, and smog by 18%, but higher impacts in land use by 97%, and eutrophication by almost 300% applying the assumptions by Pet Food Industry Federation. The results differ from other studies showing reductions in land use and eutrophication. Switching to a vegan diet can reduce GWP emissions by 340 kg CO2eq per year, while this could increase up to 6000 if high quality meat is fed.
{"title":"A life cycle assessment of vegan dog food","authors":"Lena Jarosch, Vanessa Bach, Matthias Finkbeiner","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100216","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100216","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dog food accounts for 90% of the average dog's impact on climate change. Vegan dog food is one possible alternative. There are few studies evaluating its environmental impacts. The goals of this paper are to i) determine the environmental impacts and hotspots of wet vegan dog food, ii) compare results with average meat-based alternative and estimate global climate change potential of switching from meat-based to vegan dog food diet. A life cycle assessment was performed for a can of vegan dog food for the categories climate change, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, smog, and land use. Each can had a carbon footprint of 0.4 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq., adding up to 443 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq over a dog's 15-year lifespan. A comparison with meat-based dog food showed reduction potentials in acidification by 50%, climate change by 37%, and smog by 18%, but higher impacts in land use by 97%, and eutrophication by almost 300% applying the assumptions by Pet Food Industry Federation. The results differ from other studies showing reductions in land use and eutrophication. Switching to a vegan diet can reduce GWP emissions by 340 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq per year, while this could increase up to 6000 if high quality meat is fed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100216"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000540/pdfft?md5=c565212fff1b441c369848b8b291fa70&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000540-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141962703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}