首页 > 最新文献

Cleaner Environmental Systems最新文献

英文 中文
Implementing strong sustainability in a design process 在设计过程中实施强有力的可持续性
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100224
Melissa Escobar Cisternas , Jenny Faucheu , Nadege Troussier , Valerie Laforest

The emergence of a post-growth era is expected that implies rethinking the production and consumption patterns with novel design models this forces higher educational institutions to reconsider their traditional ways of teaching sustainability in their curricula. Companies also need to overcome strategies that compartmentalize environment, society and economy in their industrial strategy in order to evolve in their support for the transition. The aim of this paper is to present a design process anchored in the Strong Sustainability paradigm to overcome the gap of how Strong Sustainability could be operationalised. Design Research Methodology (DRM) has been chosen as the supporting framework for the development of this project. The Design for Strong Sustainability (DfSoSy) methodology proposed, is built on three aspects of Strong Sustainability (Milieu, Regeneration, Safe and just operating space) successively applied in a sequenced iterative design process. The latter enable the integration of thought patterns associated with integrative, systemic and fractal or multi-scale thinking respectively. Moreover, the principle of sub-optimality is highlighted as a decision principle in SoSy. Results obtain has been validated as well on the pedagogical objectives as in the usefulness of the DfSoSy. The practical contribution of this study is the DfSoSy toolkit©.

预计后增长时代的出现意味着要以新颖的设计模式重新思考生产和消费模式,这就迫使高等院校重新考虑在课程中教授可持续发展知识的传统方式。企业也需要克服在其产业战略中将环境、社会和经济割裂开来的战略,以便在支持转型中不断发展。本文旨在介绍一个以强可持续性范式为基础的设计过程,以克服如何将强可持续性付诸实施的差距。设计研究方法论(DRM)被选为该项目的支持框架。所提出的 "强可持续性设计"(DfSoSy)方法建立在 "强可持续性 "的三个方面(环境、再生、安全和公正的操作空间)之上,并在一个有序的迭代设计过程中连续应用。后者能够整合与综合、系统和分形或多尺度思维相关的思维模式。此外,次优化原则作为 SoSy 的决策原则得到了强调。研究结果既验证了教学目标,也验证了 DfSoSy 的实用性。本研究的实际贡献在于 DfSoSy 工具包©。
{"title":"Implementing strong sustainability in a design process","authors":"Melissa Escobar Cisternas ,&nbsp;Jenny Faucheu ,&nbsp;Nadege Troussier ,&nbsp;Valerie Laforest","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100224","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100224","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emergence of a post-growth era is expected that implies rethinking the production and consumption patterns with novel design models this forces higher educational institutions to reconsider their traditional ways of teaching sustainability in their curricula. Companies also need to overcome strategies that compartmentalize environment, society and economy in their industrial strategy in order to evolve in their support for the transition. The aim of this paper is to present a design process anchored in the Strong Sustainability paradigm to overcome the gap of how Strong Sustainability could be operationalised. Design Research Methodology (DRM) has been chosen as the supporting framework for the development of this project. The Design for Strong Sustainability (DfSoSy) methodology proposed, is built on three aspects of Strong Sustainability (Milieu, Regeneration, Safe and just operating space) successively applied in a sequenced iterative design process. The latter enable the integration of thought patterns associated with integrative, systemic and fractal or multi-scale thinking respectively. Moreover, the principle of sub-optimality is highlighted as a decision principle in SoSy. Results obtain has been validated as well on the pedagogical objectives as in the usefulness of the DfSoSy. The practical contribution of this study is the DfSoSy toolkit©.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100224"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266678942400062X/pdfft?md5=07fa30ed2ac22fb2d27336fe3f7353b6&pid=1-s2.0-S266678942400062X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Life cycle assessment of organic and conventional egg production: A case study in northern Italy 有机和传统鸡蛋生产的生命周期评估:意大利北部案例研究
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100226
Simone Pelaracci, Luisa Paolotti, Lucia Rocchi, Antonio Boggia, Cesare Castellini

According to FAO projections, meat and fish production will have to increase by 70% by 2050 to meet the needs of the growing global population and its protein requirements. The poultry sector has been one of the most responsive industries to the growing demand for protein, with a significant increase in egg and chicken meat production. Although eggs are important foods in the human diet, environmental impacts and ethical aspects could also affect dietary choices. This study aimed to assess the environmental impacts of egg production, by using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). More specifically, the study compared two different farming systems of conventional and organic egg production, with reference to two case studies in northern Italy. The results obtainedgenerally showed the conventional system to be more efficient compared to the organic system. For example, as regards the impact category of Fine particulate matter formation, the conventional system had a 28.6% lower impact than the organic system. Another major difference was in the Land use category, where the conventional system had an impact of 48.5% less than the organic system. The Organic Scenario showed some critical aspects, e.g. the need for a large agricultural area, low feed conversion rates and low crop yields. The two production scenarios showed that in terms of environmental impact, the main difference between organic and conventional egg production resides in feed production. I It is, therefore, essential to work on a low input formula, to substitutethe diet components with the greatest impact and adopt strategies to obtain an increase in yields and/or a reduction in resource consumption during the cultivation phase. The complete substitution of soybean with other local crops could reduce several impacts, including the one linked to transport. The further reduction of maize could also limit the expected impact.

根据联合国粮农组织的预测,到 2050 年,肉类和鱼类产量必须增加 70%,才能满足不断增长的全球人口及其对蛋白质的需求。家禽业是对蛋白质需求增长反应最快的行业之一,鸡蛋和鸡肉产量大幅增加。虽然鸡蛋是人类饮食中的重要食物,但环境影响和道德问题也会影响人们的饮食选择。本研究旨在通过生命周期评估(LCA)来评估鸡蛋生产对环境的影响。更具体地说,该研究参照意大利北部的两个案例研究,比较了传统鸡蛋生产和有机鸡蛋生产两种不同的养殖系统。研究结果普遍表明,传统系统比有机系统更有效率。例如,在细颗粒物形成的影响类别方面,常规系统的影响比有机系统低 28.6%。另一个主要差异出现在土地利用类别上,常规系统的影响比有机系统低 48.5%。有机方案显示了一些关键方面,如需要大面积的农业区、饲料转化率低和作物产量低。两种生产方案表明,就环境影响而言,有机鸡蛋生产与传统鸡蛋生产的主要区别在于饲料生产。因此,必须采用低投入配方,替代影响最大的日粮成分,并在种植阶段采取提高产量和/或减少资源消耗的策略。用其他当地作物完全替代大豆可以减少若干影响,包括与运输有关的影响。进一步减少玉米的种植也可以限制预期的影响。
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of organic and conventional egg production: A case study in northern Italy","authors":"Simone Pelaracci,&nbsp;Luisa Paolotti,&nbsp;Lucia Rocchi,&nbsp;Antonio Boggia,&nbsp;Cesare Castellini","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100226","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100226","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to FAO projections, meat and fish production will have to increase by 70% by 2050 to meet the needs of the growing global population and its protein requirements. The poultry sector has been one of the most responsive industries to the growing demand for protein, with a significant increase in egg and chicken meat production. Although eggs are important foods in the human diet, environmental impacts and ethical aspects could also affect dietary choices. This study aimed to assess the environmental impacts of egg production, by using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). More specifically, the study compared two different farming systems of conventional and organic egg production, with reference to two case studies in northern Italy. The results obtainedgenerally showed the conventional system to be more efficient compared to the organic system. For example, as regards the impact category of Fine particulate matter formation, the conventional system had a 28.6% lower impact than the organic system. Another major difference was in the Land use category, where the conventional system had an impact of 48.5% less than the organic system. The Organic Scenario showed some critical aspects, e.g. the need for a large agricultural area, low feed conversion rates and low crop yields. The two production scenarios showed that in terms of environmental impact, the main difference between organic and conventional egg production resides in feed production. I It is, therefore, essential to work on a low input formula, to substitutethe diet components with the greatest impact and adopt strategies to obtain an increase in yields and/or a reduction in resource consumption during the cultivation phase. The complete substitution of soybean with other local crops could reduce several impacts, including the one linked to transport. The further reduction of maize could also limit the expected impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100226"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000643/pdfft?md5=77ab16562a70423cb7382c9b1de74a0c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000643-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative life cycle assessment of reusable and single use take-away lunch boxes used in student restaurants 学生餐厅使用的可重复使用和一次性外卖餐盒的生命周期比较评估
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100223
Rahul Aggarwal

Student restaurants at Chalmers University have adopted take-away lunch boxes as a convenient dining option for students with disposable single-use containers being the norm. However, there is a growing interest in more sustainable, reusable alternatives. This study conducted a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to assess the potential environmental and economic impacts of using reusable lunch boxes in comparison to disposable ones, considering 18 environmental impact categories. The functional unit chosen for evaluation was the provision of takeaway lunches to Chalmers students over the course of a year. The findings revealed that reusable boxes with 20 uses outperformed their disposable counterparts in many environmental impacts, reducing the climate change impact by 59%. However, water and energy consumption were higher for the reusable option by 99% and 62% respectively, primarily due to the cleaning process. From an economic perspective, reusable boxes proved to be 3.3% more costly than disposable ones. In conclusion, this study highlights the benefits of reusable solutions, showing reductions in various environmental footprints but presenting slightly higher economic footprints over 20 uses. However, as the number of uses increases, the advantages also increase, leading to recommendations for better management of the lunch boxes to maximize their reusable potential.

查尔姆斯大学的学生餐厅采用外卖盒饭的方式为学生提供方便的就餐选择,而一次性的一次性容器则是常态。然而,人们对更具可持续性、可重复使用的替代品越来越感兴趣。本研究进行了一项生命周期比较评估(LCA),以评估使用可重复使用餐盒与一次性餐盒相比可能产生的环境和经济影响,并考虑了 18 个环境影响类别。评估选择的功能单元是一年中为查莫斯大学学生提供的外卖午餐。评估结果表明,使用 20 次的可重复使用盒在许多环境影响方面都优于一次性盒,对气候变化的影响减少了 59%。不过,可重复使用包装盒的耗水量和能耗分别增加了 99% 和 62%,这主要是由于清洁过程造成的。从经济角度看,可重复使用包装盒的成本比一次性包装盒高 3.3%。总之,这项研究强调了可重复使用解决方案的好处,显示了各种环境足迹的减少,但在 20 次使用中经济足迹略高。不过,随着使用次数的增加,优势也在增加,因此建议更好地管理餐盒,最大限度地发挥其可重复使用的潜力。
{"title":"Comparative life cycle assessment of reusable and single use take-away lunch boxes used in student restaurants","authors":"Rahul Aggarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100223","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100223","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Student restaurants at Chalmers University have adopted take-away lunch boxes as a convenient dining option for students with disposable single-use containers being the norm. However, there is a growing interest in more sustainable, reusable alternatives. This study conducted a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to assess the potential environmental and economic impacts of using reusable lunch boxes in comparison to disposable ones, considering 18 environmental impact categories. The functional unit chosen for evaluation was the provision of takeaway lunches to Chalmers students over the course of a year. The findings revealed that reusable boxes with 20 uses outperformed their disposable counterparts in many environmental impacts, reducing the climate change impact by 59%. However, water and energy consumption were higher for the reusable option by 99% and 62% respectively, primarily due to the cleaning process. From an economic perspective, reusable boxes proved to be 3.3% more costly than disposable ones. In conclusion, this study highlights the benefits of reusable solutions, showing reductions in various environmental footprints but presenting slightly higher economic footprints over 20 uses. However, as the number of uses increases, the advantages also increase, leading to recommendations for better management of the lunch boxes to maximize their reusable potential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000618/pdfft?md5=6b20e63933ea12341812f4e34ff6273b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000618-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phosphorus recovery potential revealed by substance flow analysis of the Indian food, agricultural and sanitation system 印度食品、农业和卫生系统物质流分析揭示的磷回收潜力
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100220
Diorbhail Wentworth , Alfred Gathorne-Hardy , Priyanka Jamwal , Kate Heal

Phosphorus is a finite resource that is in high demand due to its essential role as a fertiliser. We undertook a substance flow analysis of phosphorus for India's agri-food system to identify where the biggest losses of phosphorus occur and which flows could be targeted to move phosphorus from a linear use and waste approach to a circular approach encompassing recovery and re-use. A novel aspect of the analysis was the inclusion of sanitation systems in India. National phosphorus flows were calculated annually for the five years 2015–2019, and the mean was then used to provide a representative annual flow. The analysis showed that India is dependent on imports for 95% of applied mineral phosphorus fertiliser and has a low phosphorus-use efficiency of 32%. The largest recoverable flow is human excreta (urine and faeces), equivalent to 21% of the current phosphorus applied in mineral fertiliser in India. Phosphorus recovery from septic tanks, the most prevalent sanitation system in India, could alone replace 8% of phosphorus applied in mineral fertiliser in India. Alongside the ongoing development of sanitation systems in India this provides an opportunity to ensure that nutrient recovery is included in sanitation developments.

磷是一种有限资源,由于其作为肥料的重要作用,需求量很大。我们对印度农业食品系统中的磷进行了物质流分析,以确定磷的最大损失发生在哪里,以及可以针对哪些流向将磷从线性使用和浪费方式转变为包括回收和再利用在内的循环方式。该分析的一个新颖之处是将印度的卫生系统纳入其中。每年计算 2015-2019 这五年的全国磷流量,然后使用平均值提供具有代表性的年度流量。分析表明,印度 95% 的矿物磷肥依赖进口,磷利用效率低至 32%。最大的可回收流量是人类排泄物(尿液和粪便),相当于印度目前矿物肥料中磷用量的 21%。化粪池是印度最普遍的卫生系统,仅化粪池的磷回收就可替代印度矿物肥料中 8% 的磷。随着印度卫生系统的不断发展,这为确保将养分回收纳入卫生发展提供了机会。
{"title":"Phosphorus recovery potential revealed by substance flow analysis of the Indian food, agricultural and sanitation system","authors":"Diorbhail Wentworth ,&nbsp;Alfred Gathorne-Hardy ,&nbsp;Priyanka Jamwal ,&nbsp;Kate Heal","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100220","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100220","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Phosphorus is a finite resource that is in high demand due to its essential role as a fertiliser. We undertook a substance flow analysis of phosphorus for India's agri-food system to identify where the biggest losses of phosphorus occur and which flows could be targeted to move phosphorus from a linear use and waste approach to a circular approach encompassing recovery and re-use. A novel aspect of the analysis was the inclusion of sanitation systems in India. National phosphorus flows were calculated annually for the five years 2015–2019, and the mean was then used to provide a representative annual flow. The analysis showed that India is dependent on imports for 95% of applied mineral phosphorus fertiliser and has a low phosphorus-use efficiency of 32%. The largest recoverable flow is human excreta (urine and faeces), equivalent to 21% of the current phosphorus applied in mineral fertiliser in India. Phosphorus recovery from septic tanks, the most prevalent sanitation system in India, could alone replace 8% of phosphorus applied in mineral fertiliser in India. Alongside the ongoing development of sanitation systems in India this provides an opportunity to ensure that nutrient recovery is included in sanitation developments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000588/pdfft?md5=88c6b44a9615c103502af7f995c6c885&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000588-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Life cycle GHG emissions and economic viability of two levulinic acid production processes from biomass: A case study of Japan and Canada 以生物质为原料的两种乙酰丙酸生产工艺的生命周期温室气体排放和经济可行性:日本和加拿大案例研究
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100222
Ryota Kodate , Ryu Ukawa-Sato , Haoqi Wang , Xiaotao Bi , Chihiro Fushimi

We evaluated CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and minimum selling price of levulinic acid (LA) produced in two biomass-waste-based processes: the AlCl3/choline chloride (ChCl) process, and the formic acid (FA) process, with catalysts recycling. Six scenarios were synthesized to compare the performances of the two processes in Japan and Canada. In the AlCl3/ChCl process, the total GHG emission was 11.35–11.56 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA and those from the energy input to the pretreatment and ChCl production were 5.22 and 3.90 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA, respectively. In the FA process, the total GHG emission was 9.46–9.68 and 22.29–22.51 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA for 60 wt% and 80 wt% FA, respectively. The operational emissions for makeup FA input were 7.65 and 20.80 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA (60 wt% and 80 wt%, respectively), which accounted for more than 80% in all scenarios. The optimization of the product purge volume, FA concentration in the pretreatment, and FA production using biomass and/or renewable energy are critical parameters to reduce overall environmental impacts of the processes. The liquid content of the solid residue (moisture, water soluble organic matters, and catalyst) had insignificant influences on the GHG emission and minimum selling price. In the FA process, combustion of solid residue can compensate the GHG emissions from the reaction and separation units.

我们评估了两种基于生物质废弃物的工艺:氯化铝/氯化胆碱(ChCl)工艺和甲酸(FA)工艺生产的乙酰丙酸(LA)的二氧化碳当量(CO2eq)温室气体(GHG)排放量和最低销售价格,其中甲酸(FA)工艺的催化剂可回收利用。为了比较这两种工艺在日本和加拿大的性能,我们合成了六种方案。在 AlCl3/ChCl 工艺中,温室气体总排放量为 11.35-11.56 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA,预处理和 ChCl 生产的能源输入排放量分别为 5.22 和 3.90 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA。在 FA 过程中,60 wt% 和 80 wt% FA 的温室气体排放总量分别为 9.46-9.68 和 22.29-22.51 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA。合成 FA 输入的运行排放量分别为 7.65 和 20.80 kg-CO2eq/kg-LA(60 wt% 和 80 wt%),在所有方案中均占 80% 以上。优化产品净化量、预处理中的 FA 浓度以及使用生物质和/或可再生能源生产 FA 是减少工艺对环境总体影响的关键参数。固体残留物的液体含量(水分、水溶性有机物和催化剂)对温室气体排放和最低销售价格的影响不大。在 FA 工艺中,固体残渣的燃烧可以补偿反应和分离单元的温室气体排放。
{"title":"Life cycle GHG emissions and economic viability of two levulinic acid production processes from biomass: A case study of Japan and Canada","authors":"Ryota Kodate ,&nbsp;Ryu Ukawa-Sato ,&nbsp;Haoqi Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaotao Bi ,&nbsp;Chihiro Fushimi","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100222","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100222","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We evaluated CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and minimum selling price of levulinic acid (LA) produced in two biomass-waste-based processes: the AlCl<sub>3</sub>/choline chloride (ChCl) process, and the formic acid (FA) process, with catalysts recycling. Six scenarios were synthesized to compare the performances of the two processes in Japan and Canada. In the AlCl<sub>3</sub>/ChCl process, the total GHG emission was 11.35–11.56 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg-LA and those from the energy input to the pretreatment and ChCl production were 5.22 and 3.90 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg-LA, respectively. In the FA process, the total GHG emission was 9.46–9.68 and 22.29–22.51 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg-LA for 60 wt% and 80 wt% FA, respectively. The operational emissions for makeup FA input were 7.65 and 20.80 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg-LA (60 wt% and 80 wt%, respectively), which accounted for more than 80% in all scenarios. The optimization of the product purge volume, FA concentration in the pretreatment, and FA production using biomass and/or renewable energy are critical parameters to reduce overall environmental impacts of the processes. The liquid content of the solid residue (moisture, water soluble organic matters, and catalyst) had insignificant influences on the GHG emission and minimum selling price. In the FA process, combustion of solid residue can compensate the GHG emissions from the reaction and separation units.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100222"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000606/pdfft?md5=479e258e72ca322ea8144f5c2d307e3a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000606-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142130223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frameworks for the application of machine learning in life cycle assessment for process modeling 机器学习在流程建模生命周期评估中的应用框架
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100221
Nicolás Martínez-Ramón , Fernando Calvo-Rodríguez , Diego Iribarren , Javier Dufour

In the face of escalating emission reduction demands and heightened public awareness, the imperative for transparent assessments is fundamental to responsible and sustainable development. The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) is instrumental in identifying environmental hotspots in intricate systems and guiding the design and selection of environmentally conscious production methods. However, LCA's comprehensive approach demands substantial data, fundamentally material and energy flows for individual materials or processes, consolidated within a life cycle inventory (LCI). The amount of time, resources, and expertise required to compile an accurate LCI dataset are among the greatest concerns for LCA practitioners. During the early design phase for industrial-scale production, process simulation is a useful tool for estimating LCI data; however, first-principle models can sometimes be unfeasible. This has prompted researchers and engineers to advocate for simplified or surrogate versions of these intricate models in some particular cases. In contrast to first-principle models, machine learning (ML) models efficiently manage extensive datasets and complex systems without rigorous model equations. This work assesses the current state of ML-LCA integration through literature and bibliometric analysis, categorizing works into three clusters and identifying publication trends. Furthermore, this analysis yielded three frameworks aimed at facilitating the integration of ML techniques into LCA workflows, enhancing precision and efficiency in environmental impact assessment. The first framework revealed the interest in abstracting a complete process into a surrogate ML model for fast LCI predictions. Conversely, the second one focused on substituting a complex part of the process for an ML surrogate model based on data from experiments or literature. Finally, in the third framework, LCA performance was directly correlated with a system characteristic, enabling direct and fast predictions of LCIs or LCA performance indicators, and optimization in not yet designed systems.

面对不断提高的减排要求和公众意识,透明的评估是负责任和可持续发展的基础。使用生命周期评估(LCA)有助于在错综复杂的系统中发现环境热点,并指导设计和选择具有环保意识的生产方法。然而,生命周期评估的综合方法需要大量数据,主要是在生命周期清单(LCI)中整合单个材料或工艺的材料流和能源流。编制准确的 LCI 数据集所需的时间、资源和专业知识是 LCA 从业人员最关心的问题之一。在工业规模生产的早期设计阶段,流程模拟是估算 LCI 数据的有用工具;然而,第一原理模型有时并不可行。这就促使研究人员和工程师在某些特殊情况下主张使用这些复杂模型的简化版或替代版。与第一原理模型相比,机器学习(ML)模型无需严格的模型方程,就能有效管理大量数据集和复杂系统。这项工作通过文献和文献计量分析评估了 ML-LCA 整合的现状,将作品分为三类,并确定了出版趋势。此外,该分析还得出了三个框架,旨在促进将 ML 技术集成到 LCA 工作流程中,提高环境影响评估的精度和效率。第一个框架揭示了将一个完整的过程抽象为一个代用 ML 模型以进行快速 LCI 预测的兴趣所在。与此相反,第二个框架侧重于根据实验或文献数据,用 ML 代用模型替代流程中的复杂部分。最后,在第三个框架中,生命周期评估性能与系统特性直接相关,可以直接快速地预测生命周期影响指数或生命周期评估性能指标,并对尚未设计的系统进行优化。
{"title":"Frameworks for the application of machine learning in life cycle assessment for process modeling","authors":"Nicolás Martínez-Ramón ,&nbsp;Fernando Calvo-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Diego Iribarren ,&nbsp;Javier Dufour","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100221","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100221","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the face of escalating emission reduction demands and heightened public awareness, the imperative for transparent assessments is fundamental to responsible and sustainable development. The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) is instrumental in identifying environmental hotspots in intricate systems and guiding the design and selection of environmentally conscious production methods. However, LCA's comprehensive approach demands substantial data, fundamentally material and energy flows for individual materials or processes, consolidated within a life cycle inventory (LCI). The amount of time, resources, and expertise required to compile an accurate LCI dataset are among the greatest concerns for LCA practitioners. During the early design phase for industrial-scale production, process simulation is a useful tool for estimating LCI data; however, first-principle models can sometimes be unfeasible. This has prompted researchers and engineers to advocate for simplified or surrogate versions of these intricate models in some particular cases. In contrast to first-principle models, machine learning (ML) models efficiently manage extensive datasets and complex systems without rigorous model equations. This work assesses the current state of ML-LCA integration through literature and bibliometric analysis, categorizing works into three clusters and identifying publication trends. Furthermore, this analysis yielded three frameworks aimed at facilitating the integration of ML techniques into LCA workflows, enhancing precision and efficiency in environmental impact assessment. The first framework revealed the interest in abstracting a complete process into a surrogate ML model for fast LCI predictions. Conversely, the second one focused on substituting a complex part of the process for an ML surrogate model based on data from experiments or literature. Finally, in the third framework, LCA performance was directly correlated with a system characteristic, enabling direct and fast predictions of LCIs or LCA performance indicators, and optimization in not yet designed systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266678942400059X/pdfft?md5=31344a8562ec3679d3f09265e351ceec&pid=1-s2.0-S266678942400059X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142077113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of conventionally and organically grown pineapple in Sri Lanka: An integrative approach applying life cycle assessment and externalities 斯里兰卡传统种植和有机种植菠萝的比较:应用生命周期评估和外部效应的综合方法
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100219
M. Amritha Gunawardena, Erandathie Lokupitiya

The pros and cons of the organic and conventional systems of pineapple cultivation have not been studied extensively. Non-consideration of full crop cycle and non-incorporation of environmental externalities are among the other gaps in research. The present study therefore compared Conventional Cultivation System (CCS) and Organic Cultivation System (OCS) of pineapple grown in Sri Lanka using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) under five impact categories considering system boundary from gate-to-gate and the full crop cycle. Economic analysis was conducted to determine the best system considering positive and negative externalities. Results showed 87% reduction of Global Warming Potential and 89% reduction of Eutrophication Potential under OCS. Higher toxicity potentials were reported under CCS while OCS resulted in zero toxicity. The net benefit for the farmer under OCS was higher. When the externalities were incorporated, the OCS showed a net gain of USD 8208 per ha while the CCS was no longer beneficial (USD -21,162 per ha). The study proposes economic instruments to incentivise farmers and emphasises the need to minimise adverse impacts of pesticides in sensitive locations. The study also highlights the potential of LCA studies when coupled with monetary values in guiding policy to incentivise farmers towards sustainable pineapple production.

对菠萝种植的有机系统和常规系统的利弊尚未进行广泛研究。未考虑整个作物周期和未纳入环境外部因素是研究中的其他空白。因此,本研究采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法,对斯里兰卡菠萝种植的常规栽培系统(CCS)和有机栽培系统(OCS)进行了比较,生命周期评估考虑了从入口到出口的系统边界和整个作物周期的五个影响类别。考虑到积极和消极的外部效应,进行了经济分析以确定最佳系统。结果表明,在 OCS 系统下,全球变暖潜能值降低了 87%,富营养化潜能值降低了 89%。综合碳捕获和储存系统的毒性潜能值较高,而其他碳捕获和储存系统的毒性为零。在 OCS 条件下,农民的净收益更高。当考虑到外部因素时,OCS 的净收益为每公顷 8208 美元,而 CCS 则不再有利(每公顷-21162 美元)。该研究提出了激励农民的经济手段,并强调需要尽量减少农药对敏感地区的不利影响。该研究还强调了生命周期评估研究与货币价值相结合在指导政策方面的潜力,以激励农民进行可持续的菠萝生产。
{"title":"Comparison of conventionally and organically grown pineapple in Sri Lanka: An integrative approach applying life cycle assessment and externalities","authors":"M. Amritha Gunawardena,&nbsp;Erandathie Lokupitiya","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100219","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100219","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The pros and cons of the organic and conventional systems of pineapple cultivation have not been studied extensively. Non-consideration of full crop cycle and non-incorporation of environmental externalities are among the other gaps in research. The present study therefore compared Conventional Cultivation System (CCS) and Organic Cultivation System (OCS) of pineapple grown in Sri Lanka using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) under five impact categories considering system boundary from gate-to-gate and the full crop cycle. Economic analysis was conducted to determine the best system considering positive and negative externalities. Results showed 87% reduction of Global Warming Potential and 89% reduction of Eutrophication Potential under OCS. Higher toxicity potentials were reported under CCS while OCS resulted in zero toxicity. The net benefit for the farmer under OCS was higher. When the externalities were incorporated, the OCS showed a net gain of USD 8208 per ha while the CCS was no longer beneficial (USD -21,162 per ha). The study proposes economic instruments to incentivise farmers and emphasises the need to minimise adverse impacts of pesticides in sensitive locations. The study also highlights the potential of LCA studies when coupled with monetary values in guiding policy to incentivise farmers towards sustainable pineapple production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000576/pdfft?md5=1f8ce56a81a9190ab4fe6b815180c9a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000576-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142002175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing energy efficiency in SMEs: A case study-based framework for non-energy-intensive manufacturing companies 提高中小企业能效:基于案例研究的非能源密集型制造企业框架
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100218
Atacan Ketenci, Matthias Wolf

The manufacturing industry increasingly needs to shift toward energy-efficient production patterns to address both environmental pollution reduction and higher energy prices. Despite efforts to enhance energy efficiency and to close the energy efficiency gap in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) limited awareness, lack of know-how, and restricted financial and human resources still hinder large-scale adoption. This is partly because current research on energy flow analysis (EFA) often lacks structured and detailed methodologies and neglects a suitable evaluation of potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. In response, we derived a framework from existing literature and applied action research to tailor it to identify energy flows and cost-effective reduction potentials for GHG emissions in SMEs. The framework aims to improve awareness, transparency, and decision-making regarding energy consumption and environmental protection within SMEs by combining GHG accounting with comprehensive EFA to enhance energy efficiency. Furthermore, the framework outlines specific activities to guide SMEs through the implementation process. Two case studies were conducted in partnership with companies operating in the automotive and environmental sectors to develop and validate the framework. Although the case studies focused on non-energy-intensive industries, they revealed untapped potential for reducing energy consumption. Both case studies showed reductions in energy use through the identified measures, achieving reductions of 900,000 kWh and 1,300,000 kWh, respectively. At 2021 energy price levels, these reductions led to a significant drop in energy costs: a 16% drop in case one and 22% in case two. Additionally, insights from the case studies have led to further refinements of the framework, emphasizing the necessity of tailored solutions and resource considerations for SMEs. These findings helped to identify opportunities for future research directions toward optimizing energy management practices in SMEs.

制造业越来越需要向高能效生产模式转变,以解决减少环境污染和能源价格上涨的问题。尽管中小型企业(SMEs)在提高能效和缩小能效差距方面做出了努力,但有限的意识、技术诀窍的缺乏以及财力和人力资源的限制仍然阻碍着能效的大规模采用。其部分原因在于,目前的能流分析(EFA)研究往往缺乏结构化的详细方法,并且忽视了对潜在温室气体(GHG)减排量的适当评估。为此,我们从现有文献中总结出一个框架,并应用行动研究对其进行调整,以确定中小企业的能源流和具有成本效益的温室气体减排潜力。该框架旨在通过将温室气体核算与全面的能源效率评估(EFA)相结合,提高中小企业对能源消耗和环境保护的认识、透明度和决策水平,从而提高能源效率。此外,该框架还概述了指导中小企业实施过程的具体活动。为了开发和验证该框架,我们与汽车和环保领域的公司合作开展了两项案例研究。虽然案例研究的重点是非能源密集型行业,但它们揭示了尚未开发的减少能源消耗的潜力。两个案例研究都显示,通过采取确定的措施,能源使用量有所减少,分别减少了 900,000 千瓦时和 1,300,000 千瓦时。在 2021 年的能源价格水平下,这些减少的能源使用导致了能源成本的显著下降:案例一和案例二分别下降了 16% 和 22%。此外,从案例研究中获得的启示还进一步完善了框架,强调了为中小企业量身定制解决方案和资源考虑的必要性。这些发现有助于确定未来的研究方向,从而优化中小企业的能源管理实践。
{"title":"Advancing energy efficiency in SMEs: A case study-based framework for non-energy-intensive manufacturing companies","authors":"Atacan Ketenci,&nbsp;Matthias Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100218","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100218","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The manufacturing industry increasingly needs to shift toward energy-efficient production patterns to address both environmental pollution reduction and higher energy prices. Despite efforts to enhance energy efficiency and to close the energy efficiency gap in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) limited awareness, lack of know-how, and restricted financial and human resources still hinder large-scale adoption. This is partly because current research on energy flow analysis (EFA) often lacks structured and detailed methodologies and neglects a suitable evaluation of potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. In response, we derived a framework from existing literature and applied action research to tailor it to identify energy flows and cost-effective reduction potentials for GHG emissions in SMEs. The framework aims to improve awareness, transparency, and decision-making regarding energy consumption and environmental protection within SMEs by combining GHG accounting with comprehensive EFA to enhance energy efficiency. Furthermore, the framework outlines specific activities to guide SMEs through the implementation process. Two case studies were conducted in partnership with companies operating in the automotive and environmental sectors to develop and validate the framework. Although the case studies focused on non-energy-intensive industries, they revealed untapped potential for reducing energy consumption. Both case studies showed reductions in energy use through the identified measures, achieving reductions of 900,000 kWh and 1,300,000 kWh, respectively. At 2021 energy price levels, these reductions led to a significant drop in energy costs: a 16% drop in case one and 22% in case two. Additionally, insights from the case studies have led to further refinements of the framework, emphasizing the necessity of tailored solutions and resource considerations for SMEs. These findings helped to identify opportunities for future research directions toward optimizing energy management practices in SMEs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100218"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000564/pdfft?md5=14a02a5564be090e7a36342e539d983d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000564-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Life cycle assessment of plastic and paper carrying bags in the Philippines 菲律宾塑料袋和纸袋的生命周期评估
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100217
Aristotle T. Ubando , Jeremias A. Gonzaga , Ivan Henderson V. Gue , Jose Bienvenido Manuel Biona

Plastic waste mismanagement is a pertinent environmental concern among developing countries. The Philippines has a significant plastic waste concern as the country is among the top emitters of plastic wastes to the ocean. To manage plastic wastes, the government enacted policies. resulting to paper carrying bags becoming a prominent alternative. Switching from one carrying bag to another, however, requires clear assessment on the environmental implications as environmental trade-offs can occur. To provide the needed clarity, this study assessed the environmental implications of plastic and paper carrying bags through a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. This study developed a model with the novelty of a) supply chain integration, b) augmented Environmental Design of Industrial Products (EDIP) impact assessment, and c) inventory categorization. From the augmented EDIP assessment, paper carrying bags had a single score impact of 0.73 whereas plastic carrying bags had a single score of 0.63. In terms of geographic emissions, this work revealed that paper carrying bags emit 50.28% of its emissions outside the country whereas plastic carrying bag emit 34.72%. Policy recommendations derived from the findings are provided in this paper. Recommendations include carbon capture and storage, green procurement, circular management, and waste management system improvement. Policy makers may infer from the recommendations in managing environmental issues from the use of carrying bags.

塑料废物管理不善是发展中国家关注的一个相关环境问题。菲律宾是向海洋排放塑料废物最多的国家之一,因此塑料废物问题十分突出。为了管理塑料垃圾,政府颁布了相关政策,结果纸质手提袋成为一种重要的替代品。然而,从一种提袋转向另一种提袋需要对环境影响进行明确评估,因为可能会出现环境权衡。为了提供所需的清晰度,本研究通过生命周期评估(LCA)方法评估了塑料袋和纸袋对环境的影响。本研究开发了一个新颖的模型:a) 供应链整合;b) 增强型工业产品环境设计(EDIP)影响评估;c) 库存分类。通过增强型 EDIP 评估,纸质手提袋的单项影响得分为 0.73,而塑料手提袋的单项影响得分为 0.63。在地域排放方面,这项工作显示,纸质手提袋有 50.28% 的排放量排放到国外,而塑料手提袋则有 34.72% 的排放量排放到国外。本文提供了根据研究结果得出的政策建议。建议包括碳捕集与封存、绿色采购、循环管理和废物管理系统改进。政策制定者可以从这些建议中推断出如何管理因使用手提袋而产生的环境问题。
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of plastic and paper carrying bags in the Philippines","authors":"Aristotle T. Ubando ,&nbsp;Jeremias A. Gonzaga ,&nbsp;Ivan Henderson V. Gue ,&nbsp;Jose Bienvenido Manuel Biona","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100217","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100217","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plastic waste mismanagement is a pertinent environmental concern among developing countries. The Philippines has a significant plastic waste concern as the country is among the top emitters of plastic wastes to the ocean. To manage plastic wastes, the government enacted policies. resulting to paper carrying bags becoming a prominent alternative. Switching from one carrying bag to another, however, requires clear assessment on the environmental implications as environmental trade-offs can occur. To provide the needed clarity, this study assessed the environmental implications of plastic and paper carrying bags through a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. This study developed a model with the novelty of a) supply chain integration, b) augmented Environmental Design of Industrial Products (EDIP) impact assessment, and c) inventory categorization. From the augmented EDIP assessment, paper carrying bags had a single score impact of 0.73 whereas plastic carrying bags had a single score of 0.63. In terms of geographic emissions, this work revealed that paper carrying bags emit 50.28% of its emissions outside the country whereas plastic carrying bag emit 34.72%. Policy recommendations derived from the findings are provided in this paper. Recommendations include carbon capture and storage, green procurement, circular management, and waste management system improvement. Policy makers may infer from the recommendations in managing environmental issues from the use of carrying bags.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100217"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000552/pdfft?md5=dcc10a7ff298770bdaeb7dc605167add&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000552-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141979393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A life cycle assessment of vegan dog food 素食狗粮的生命周期评估
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100216
Lena Jarosch, Vanessa Bach, Matthias Finkbeiner

Dog food accounts for 90% of the average dog's impact on climate change. Vegan dog food is one possible alternative. There are few studies evaluating its environmental impacts. The goals of this paper are to i) determine the environmental impacts and hotspots of wet vegan dog food, ii) compare results with average meat-based alternative and estimate global climate change potential of switching from meat-based to vegan dog food diet. A life cycle assessment was performed for a can of vegan dog food for the categories climate change, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, smog, and land use. Each can had a carbon footprint of 0.4 kg CO2-eq., adding up to 443 kg CO2-eq over a dog's 15-year lifespan. A comparison with meat-based dog food showed reduction potentials in acidification by 50%, climate change by 37%, and smog by 18%, but higher impacts in land use by 97%, and eutrophication by almost 300% applying the assumptions by Pet Food Industry Federation. The results differ from other studies showing reductions in land use and eutrophication. Switching to a vegan diet can reduce GWP emissions by 340 kg CO2eq per year, while this could increase up to 6000 if high quality meat is fed.

狗粮占普通狗对气候变化影响的 90%。素食狗粮是一种可能的替代品。评估其环境影响的研究很少。本文的目标是 i) 确定湿素食狗粮的环境影响和热点;ii) 将结果与普通肉类替代品进行比较,并估算从肉类狗粮转向素食狗粮的全球气候变化潜力。针对气候变化、淡水富营养化、陆地酸化、烟雾和土地利用等类别,对一罐纯素狗粮进行了生命周期评估。每罐狗粮的碳足迹为 0.4 千克二氧化碳当量,在一只狗 15 年的生命周期内,碳足迹总计为 443 千克二氧化碳当量。根据宠物食品工业联合会的假设,与肉类狗粮相比,酸化减少了 50%,气候变化减少了 37%,烟雾减少了 18%,但对土地使用的影响增加了 97%,富营养化增加了近 300%。这些结果与其他研究显示的减少土地使用和富营养化的结果不同。转为素食每年可减少 340 千克二氧化碳当量的全球升温潜能值排放,而如果喂养优质肉类,则可增加到 6000 千克。
{"title":"A life cycle assessment of vegan dog food","authors":"Lena Jarosch,&nbsp;Vanessa Bach,&nbsp;Matthias Finkbeiner","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100216","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100216","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dog food accounts for 90% of the average dog's impact on climate change. Vegan dog food is one possible alternative. There are few studies evaluating its environmental impacts. The goals of this paper are to i) determine the environmental impacts and hotspots of wet vegan dog food, ii) compare results with average meat-based alternative and estimate global climate change potential of switching from meat-based to vegan dog food diet. A life cycle assessment was performed for a can of vegan dog food for the categories climate change, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, smog, and land use. Each can had a carbon footprint of 0.4 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq., adding up to 443 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq over a dog's 15-year lifespan. A comparison with meat-based dog food showed reduction potentials in acidification by 50%, climate change by 37%, and smog by 18%, but higher impacts in land use by 97%, and eutrophication by almost 300% applying the assumptions by Pet Food Industry Federation. The results differ from other studies showing reductions in land use and eutrophication. Switching to a vegan diet can reduce GWP emissions by 340 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq per year, while this could increase up to 6000 if high quality meat is fed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100216"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000540/pdfft?md5=c565212fff1b441c369848b8b291fa70&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000540-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141962703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1