首页 > 最新文献

Cleaner Environmental Systems最新文献

英文 中文
Unlocking sustainable production pathways: Digital transformation driving green dual innovation in Chinese enterprises 解锁可持续生产路径:数字化转型推动中国企业绿色双创新
IF 4.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-07-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100301
Tian Xia , Xudong Chen
In the context of accelerating digital transformation and increasing environmental pressures, this study investigates how enterprise digitalization influences green dual innovation—comprising green exploratory innovation (EI) and green developmental innovation (DI)—within Chinese A-share listed firms from 2016 to 2023. Drawing upon fixed-effects and triple difference models, we empirically examine the mechanisms through which digital transformation (DCG) enhances green innovation and assess the mediating role of R&D investment and the moderating effect of government subsidies (GS). Results reveal that digital transformation significantly promotes both EI and DI, with a stronger effect on EI. R&D investment fully mediates this relationship, indicating that digital capabilities boost green innovation primarily through enhanced research capacity. Government subsidies exhibit a dual effect: they positively moderate the impact of digital transformation on EI, while dampening its influence on DI, possibly due to over-reliance on external funding. Heterogeneity analysis through triple difference methods uncovers substantial regional and industry-level variation—particularly among high-tech and heavily polluting firms in Eastern China—where digital transformation's green effects are constrained by strategic short-termism or technological limitations. These findings offer theoretical insights and practical implications for firms and policymakers aiming to align digital strategy with green transformation objectives under sustainability mandates.
本文以2016 - 2023年中国a股上市公司为研究对象,研究了数字化对绿色探索性创新(EI)和绿色发展性创新(DI)双重创新的影响。利用固定效应模型和三重差异模型,实证研究了数字化转型促进绿色创新的机制,并评估了研发投资的中介作用和政府补贴的调节作用。结果表明,数字化转型显著促进了EI和DI,且对EI的影响更强。研发投资完全中介了这一关系,表明数字能力主要通过提高研究能力来促进绿色创新。政府补贴表现出双重效应:它们积极调节数字化转型对EI的影响,同时抑制其对DI的影响,这可能是由于过度依赖外部资金。通过三重差异方法进行的异质性分析揭示了大量的区域和行业层面的差异,特别是在中国东部的高科技和重污染企业中,数字转型的绿色效应受到战略短期主义或技术限制的制约。这些发现为企业和政策制定者提供了理论见解和实践意义,旨在使数字战略与可持续发展要求下的绿色转型目标保持一致。
{"title":"Unlocking sustainable production pathways: Digital transformation driving green dual innovation in Chinese enterprises","authors":"Tian Xia ,&nbsp;Xudong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100301","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100301","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of accelerating digital transformation and increasing environmental pressures, this study investigates how enterprise digitalization influences green dual innovation—comprising green exploratory innovation (EI) and green developmental innovation (DI)—within Chinese A-share listed firms from 2016 to 2023. Drawing upon fixed-effects and triple difference models, we empirically examine the mechanisms through which digital transformation (DCG) enhances green innovation and assess the mediating role of R&amp;D investment and the moderating effect of government subsidies (GS). Results reveal that digital transformation significantly promotes both EI and DI, with a stronger effect on EI. R&amp;D investment fully mediates this relationship, indicating that digital capabilities boost green innovation primarily through enhanced research capacity. Government subsidies exhibit a dual effect: they positively moderate the impact of digital transformation on EI, while dampening its influence on DI, possibly due to over-reliance on external funding. Heterogeneity analysis through triple difference methods uncovers substantial regional and industry-level variation—particularly among high-tech and heavily polluting firms in Eastern China—where digital transformation's green effects are constrained by strategic short-termism or technological limitations. These findings offer theoretical insights and practical implications for firms and policymakers aiming to align digital strategy with green transformation objectives under sustainability mandates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100301"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145107621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantifying global warming potential, land use and financial cost of constructed wetland as a post-treatment technology for removing micropollutants from municipal wastewater 量化人工湿地作为去除城市污水微污染物后处理技术的全球变暖潜势、土地利用和财务成本
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-07-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100297
Yu Lei , Jorn de Vos, Huub Rijnaarts, Wei-Shan Chen
The occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment shows potential adverse effects towards ecosystems, such as estrogenic effects on the sexual development of fish and the resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics. Constructed wetlands (CWs) can be used as a post-treatment technology to remove micropollutants from the effluent of conventional wastewater treatment plants. Life Cycle Assessment was performed to assess the environmental and economic impacts of two constructed wetlands (i.e. sand-based CW and bark and biochar-based CW), and compared these impacts with other selected wastewater treatment technologies (i.e. ozone and activated carbon-based technologies). Regarding the removal efficiency of MPs, the bark and biochar-based CW showed a higher removal range than other technologies, though a fluctuation of removals exists due to the effect of seasonality. The CW scenarios require larger land to obtain the desired MP removal efficiencies than other technologies. Despite this, using bark and biochar as support matrices can reduce the land use of the CW system (0.51 m2/m3) compared with sand (0.58 m2/m3). The Global Warming Potential and overall treatment costs of the CW scenarios (i.e. the bark and biochar-based CW with 148 g CO2 equivalent/m3 and 0.14 €/m3; the sand-based CW with 108 g CO2 equivalent/m3 and 0.12 €/m3) rank in the middle among the studied technologies. The findings of this research provide valuable support for the decision-making process in selecting a nature-based technology working as a post-treatment of WWTPs for MP removal.
微污染物在水生环境中的出现显示了对生态系统的潜在不利影响,例如对鱼类性发育的雌激素影响和微生物对抗生素的抗性。人工湿地(CWs)可作为一种后处理技术,用于去除常规污水处理厂出水中的微污染物。采用生命周期评估方法,对两种人工湿地(砂基连续湿地、树皮和生物炭基连续湿地)的环境和经济影响进行了评估,并将这些影响与其他选定的废水处理技术(臭氧和活性炭基技术)进行了比较。在MPs的去除率方面,树皮和生物炭基CW的去除率高于其他技术,但由于季节的影响,去除率存在波动。与其他技术相比,连续油管方案需要更大的土地来获得所需的MP去除效率。尽管如此,与沙子(0.58 m2/m3)相比,使用树皮和生物炭作为支撑基质可以减少CW系统的土地利用(0.51 m2/m3)。连续水处理方案的全球变暖潜势和总体处理成本(即树皮基和生物炭基连续水处理分别为148 g CO2当量/m3和0.14欧元/m3;砂基连续油管技术(CO2当量为108 g /m3, CO2当量为0.12€/m3)在研究的技术中排名居中。本研究的发现为选择基于自然的技术作为污水处理厂去除MP的后处理的决策过程提供了有价值的支持。
{"title":"Quantifying global warming potential, land use and financial cost of constructed wetland as a post-treatment technology for removing micropollutants from municipal wastewater","authors":"Yu Lei ,&nbsp;Jorn de Vos,&nbsp;Huub Rijnaarts,&nbsp;Wei-Shan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100297","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100297","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment shows potential adverse effects towards ecosystems, such as estrogenic effects on the sexual development of fish and the resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics. Constructed wetlands (CWs) can be used as a post-treatment technology to remove micropollutants from the effluent of conventional wastewater treatment plants. Life Cycle Assessment was performed to assess the environmental and economic impacts of two constructed wetlands (i.e. sand-based CW and bark and biochar-based CW), and compared these impacts with other selected wastewater treatment technologies (i.e. ozone and activated carbon-based technologies). Regarding the removal efficiency of MPs, the bark and biochar-based CW showed a higher removal range than other technologies, though a fluctuation of removals exists due to the effect of seasonality. The CW scenarios require larger land to obtain the desired MP removal efficiencies than other technologies. Despite this, using bark and biochar as support matrices can reduce the land use of the CW system (0.51 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>3</sup>) compared with sand (0.58 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>3</sup>). The Global Warming Potential and overall treatment costs of the CW scenarios (i.e. the bark and biochar-based CW with 148 g CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent/m<sup>3</sup> and 0.14 €/m<sup>3</sup>; the sand-based CW with 108 g CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent/m<sup>3</sup> and 0.12 €/m<sup>3</sup>) rank in the middle among the studied technologies. The findings of this research provide valuable support for the decision-making process in selecting a nature-based technology working as a post-treatment of WWTPs for MP removal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100297"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144671015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trade-offs in technical and environmental performance of water utilities: Insights focused on water-energy-carbon nexus 水务公司技术和环境绩效的权衡:关注水-能源-碳关系的见解
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100300
Alexandros Maziotis , Ramón Sala-Garrido , Manuel Mocholi-Arce , Maria Molinos-Senante
Within the water-energy-carbon nexus, understanding the trade-offs among resource use, drinking water delivery, and greenhouse gas emissions is essential for ensuring the sustainable provision of drinking water. Addressing this challenge, this study estimates four performance indices—technical efficiency, ecological efficiency, process environmental quality efficiency, and overall efficiency —using a unified framework based on Data Envelopment Analysis. The analysis was conducted under two scenarios, reflecting water companies’ prioritization of production and environmental dimensions. The empirical application, performed on a sample of English and Welsh water companies, revealed that water companies focused on technical efficiency, achieving average scores of 0.648 and 0.798 under environmental and production prioritization scenarios, respectively. In contrast, process environmental quality and ecological efficiency metrics were considerably lower, with average values of 0.179 and 0.129 for the environmental scenario and 0.153 and 0.131 for the production scenario. The temporal evolution of these performance indices highlights a trade-off between technical efficiency and performance indices integrating carbon emissions under the environmental prioritization scenario.
在水-能源-碳关系中,了解资源利用、饮用水输送和温室气体排放之间的权衡对于确保可持续提供饮用水至关重要。针对这一挑战,本研究采用基于数据包络分析的统一框架,估算了技术效率、生态效率、过程环境质量效率和整体效率四个绩效指标。分析是在两种情况下进行的,反映了水公司对生产和环境维度的优先考虑。对英格兰和威尔士水务公司样本进行的实证应用显示,水务公司关注技术效率,在环境和生产优先情景下分别获得0.648和0.798的平均得分。过程环境质量和生态效率指标相对较低,环境情景的平均值分别为0.179和0.129,生产情景的平均值分别为0.153和0.131。这些绩效指标的时间演化凸显了环境优先情景下技术效率与整合碳排放的绩效指标之间的权衡关系。
{"title":"Trade-offs in technical and environmental performance of water utilities: Insights focused on water-energy-carbon nexus","authors":"Alexandros Maziotis ,&nbsp;Ramón Sala-Garrido ,&nbsp;Manuel Mocholi-Arce ,&nbsp;Maria Molinos-Senante","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100300","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100300","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Within the water-energy-carbon nexus, understanding the trade-offs among resource use, drinking water delivery, and greenhouse gas emissions is essential for ensuring the sustainable provision of drinking water. Addressing this challenge, this study estimates four performance indices—technical efficiency, ecological efficiency, process environmental quality efficiency, and overall efficiency —using a unified framework based on Data Envelopment Analysis. The analysis was conducted under two scenarios, reflecting water companies’ prioritization of production and environmental dimensions. The empirical application, performed on a sample of English and Welsh water companies, revealed that water companies focused on technical efficiency, achieving average scores of 0.648 and 0.798 under environmental and production prioritization scenarios, respectively. In contrast, process environmental quality and ecological efficiency metrics were considerably lower, with average values of 0.179 and 0.129 for the environmental scenario and 0.153 and 0.131 for the production scenario. The temporal evolution of these performance indices highlights a trade-off between technical efficiency and performance indices integrating carbon emissions under the environmental prioritization scenario.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100300"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144623357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evolution of financial sustainability of Canadian waste management industries in government and private sectors 加拿大政府和私营部门废物管理行业财务可持续性的演变
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100298
Sharmin Jahan Mim, Anica Tasnim, Rumpa Chowdhury, Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng, Amy Richter
There is a lack of government and private sector-specific analysis on the economic sustainability of waste management services in Canada. This study addresses that gap by conducting a comprehensive 23-year analysis of waste management industry data across four Western Canadian provinces, examining both sectors separately. This distinction enhances understanding of how economic and employment factors uniquely influence waste disposal, diversion, and revenue growth. The study reveals a predominantly private sector led management system, with the highest national revenue in 2018 ($221.9/cap). The private sector's substantial investment in waste diversion significantly impacts its robust revenue growth and consistently higher profit margins. In contrast, the government sector exhibits fluctuating operating revenue, primarily supported by income and property taxes, reflecting an inconsistent financial structure. Lower waste diversion rates in some provinces may be linked to higher proportion of part-time employees in the government sector, impacting financial sustainability. However, recent upward trends in government capital investment suggest a shift toward long-term development goals rather than short-term revenue gains. Findings highlights distinct differences in business and employment characteristics between sectors. The study provides an analytical framework for optimized financial and resource planning within Canada's waste management landscape.
政府和私营部门对加拿大废物管理服务的经济可持续性缺乏具体分析。本研究通过对加拿大西部四个省的废物管理行业数据进行了23年的全面分析,分别检查了这两个部门,从而解决了这一差距。这种区别增强了对经济和就业因素如何独特地影响废物处理、转移和收入增长的理解。该研究揭示了一个主要由私营部门主导的管理系统,2018年全国收入最高(221.9美元/上限)。私营机构在废物转移方面的大量投资对其强劲的收入增长和持续较高的利润率产生了重大影响。相比之下,政府部门的营业收入波动较大,主要由所得税和财产税支撑,反映出财政结构不一致。在一些省份,较低的废物转移率可能与政府部门兼职雇员比例较高有关,从而影响财政可持续性。然而,最近政府资本投资的上升趋势表明,中国正在转向长期发展目标,而不是短期收入增长。调查结果强调了不同行业在商业和就业特征上的明显差异。该研究为加拿大废物管理领域内优化财务和资源规划提供了一个分析框架。
{"title":"Evolution of financial sustainability of Canadian waste management industries in government and private sectors","authors":"Sharmin Jahan Mim,&nbsp;Anica Tasnim,&nbsp;Rumpa Chowdhury,&nbsp;Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng,&nbsp;Amy Richter","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100298","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100298","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a lack of government and private sector-specific analysis on the economic sustainability of waste management services in Canada. This study addresses that gap by conducting a comprehensive 23-year analysis of waste management industry data across four Western Canadian provinces, examining both sectors separately. This distinction enhances understanding of how economic and employment factors uniquely influence waste disposal, diversion, and revenue growth. The study reveals a predominantly private sector led management system, with the highest national revenue in 2018 ($221.9/cap). The private sector's substantial investment in waste diversion significantly impacts its robust revenue growth and consistently higher profit margins. In contrast, the government sector exhibits fluctuating operating revenue, primarily supported by income and property taxes, reflecting an inconsistent financial structure. Lower waste diversion rates in some provinces may be linked to higher proportion of part-time employees in the government sector, impacting financial sustainability. However, recent upward trends in government capital investment suggest a shift toward long-term development goals rather than short-term revenue gains. Findings highlights distinct differences in business and employment characteristics between sectors. The study provides an analytical framework for optimized financial and resource planning within Canada's waste management landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100298"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144656623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can market-oriented environmental regulation achieve synergistic reduction of atmospheric pollution and carbon emissions? Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy 以市场为导向的环境监管能否协同减少大气污染和碳排放?来自中国碳排放交易政策的证据
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100299
Yuechao Zhao , Yin Feng , Jun Shen , Yijie He
Promoting the synergistic reduction of atmospheric pollution and carbon emissions is of great significance for China to achieve its emission reduction commitments. Based on the emission factor method (EFM), the difference-in-difference (DID) model, and the index decomposition, this paper calculates the integrated emission equivalent of atmospheric pollution and carbon emissions, and explores the impact of carbon emissions trading (CET) on the synergistic reduction effects. The results show that CET can significantly promote the synergistic reduction enhancement. After parallel trend test, endogeneity test, and PSM-DID, the conclusion still holds. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the synergistic effects are more significant in the eastern and western regions of China. Market mechanism tests show that moderately increasing the penalty for default can promote the synergistic effects, while excessive government intervention has an inhibitory effect. Further analysis shows that the synergistic effects mainly come from energy efficiency and economic development effects, while the synergistic effects of pollution control are gradually strengthening. Examining the synergistic reduction through CET aligns with the concept of green development in China and provides evidence for the coordinated governance of multiple pollutants.
推动大气污染与碳排放协同减排,对中国实现减排承诺具有重要意义。基于排放因子法(EFM)、差分差分(DID)模型和指标分解,计算大气污染与碳排放的综合排放当量,探讨碳排放权交易(CET)对协同减排效应的影响。结果表明,CET能显著促进协同还原增强。经平行趋势检验、内生性检验和PSM-DID检验,结论仍然成立。异质性分析表明,中国东部和西部地区的协同效应更为显著。市场机制检验表明,适度加大违约处罚力度能够促进协同效应,而过度的政府干预则具有抑制效应。进一步分析表明,协同效应主要来自能源效率效应和经济发展效应,而污染治理的协同效应正在逐步增强。通过CET研究协同减排符合中国绿色发展的理念,并为多种污染物的协调治理提供了证据。
{"title":"Can market-oriented environmental regulation achieve synergistic reduction of atmospheric pollution and carbon emissions? Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy","authors":"Yuechao Zhao ,&nbsp;Yin Feng ,&nbsp;Jun Shen ,&nbsp;Yijie He","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100299","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100299","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Promoting the synergistic reduction of atmospheric pollution and carbon emissions is of great significance for China to achieve its emission reduction commitments. Based on the emission factor method (EFM), the difference-in-difference (DID) model, and the index decomposition, this paper calculates the integrated emission equivalent of atmospheric pollution and carbon emissions, and explores the impact of carbon emissions trading (CET) on the synergistic reduction effects. The results show that CET can significantly promote the synergistic reduction enhancement. After parallel trend test, endogeneity test, and PSM-DID, the conclusion still holds. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the synergistic effects are more significant in the eastern and western regions of China. Market mechanism tests show that moderately increasing the penalty for default can promote the synergistic effects, while excessive government intervention has an inhibitory effect. Further analysis shows that the synergistic effects mainly come from energy efficiency and economic development effects, while the synergistic effects of pollution control are gradually strengthening. Examining the synergistic reduction through CET aligns with the concept of green development in China and provides evidence for the coordinated governance of multiple pollutants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100299"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144656624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing and monitoring the environmental performance of complex industrial projects: a communication-based approach 加强和监测复杂工业项目的环境绩效:基于沟通的方法
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100295
Joseph Mansour Salamé , Isabelle Nicolaï , Michael Saidani , Yann Leroy
Monitoring the environmental performance of projects depends on effective information sharing and indicators that enable stakeholders to track and drive environmental decisions throughout project phases. Several environmental frameworks, assessment tools, methodologies, and standards can guide the definition of these performance indicators. However, it is not always easy for industrial actors to understand, use, or adapt the existing assessment tools to match their business and projects. Additionally, selecting indicators for complex industrial projects is more challenging due to the multiplicity of stakeholders involved, each with different roles, and often lacking effective structured communication.
This article proposes a communication-based approach for selecting environmental performance indicators appropriate to complex industrial projects. This method utilizes Lasswell's communication model to assign stakeholders the roles of indicators' providers, receivers, and experts based on defined objectives. Lasswell's model bolsters existing assessment frameworks by incorporating the sharing aspect among stakeholders that they lack.
The proposed method is used to select environmental performance indicators for monitoring rail infrastructure projects. These projects are inherently complex, involving multiple stakeholders with significant technical expertise across several long project phases.
By using this method, the resulting indicators not only reflect scientific soundness but also incorporate the knowledge and interests of all stakeholders involved. A key feature of this approach is the recognition that selecting environmental indicators is a ‘collaborative challenge’. This challenge can only be addressed through structured information exchange, allowing for a transition from environmental diagnosis to environmental monitoring of complex projects.
监测项目的环境绩效取决于有效的信息共享和指标,使利益相关者能够在整个项目阶段跟踪和推动环境决策。一些环境框架、评估工具、方法和标准可以指导这些绩效指标的定义。然而,对于行业参与者来说,理解、使用或调整现有的评估工具来匹配他们的业务和项目并不总是容易的。此外,为复杂的工业项目选择指标更具挑战性,因为涉及的利益相关者众多,每个人都有不同的角色,而且往往缺乏有效的结构化沟通。本文提出了一种基于沟通的方法来选择适合复杂工业项目的环境绩效指标。该方法利用拉斯韦尔的沟通模型,根据确定的目标为利益相关者分配指标提供者、接受者和专家的角色。拉斯韦尔的模型通过纳入利益相关者之间缺乏的共享方面来支持现有的评估框架。将该方法应用于铁路基础设施项目环境绩效指标的选择。这些项目本质上是复杂的,涉及多个具有重要技术专长的涉众,跨越几个较长的项目阶段。通过使用该方法,得出的指标不仅反映了科学的合理性,而且纳入了所有利益相关者的知识和利益。这种方法的一个关键特征是认识到选择环境指标是一项“协作挑战”。这一挑战只能通过结构化的信息交换来解决,从而允许从环境诊断到复杂项目的环境监测的过渡。
{"title":"Enhancing and monitoring the environmental performance of complex industrial projects: a communication-based approach","authors":"Joseph Mansour Salamé ,&nbsp;Isabelle Nicolaï ,&nbsp;Michael Saidani ,&nbsp;Yann Leroy","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100295","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100295","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring the environmental performance of projects depends on effective information sharing and indicators that enable stakeholders to track and drive environmental decisions throughout project phases. Several environmental frameworks, assessment tools, methodologies, and standards can guide the definition of these performance indicators. However, it is not always easy for industrial actors to understand, use, or adapt the existing assessment tools to match their business and projects. Additionally, selecting indicators for complex industrial projects is more challenging due to the multiplicity of stakeholders involved, each with different roles, and often lacking effective structured communication.</div><div>This article proposes a communication-based approach for selecting environmental performance indicators appropriate to complex industrial projects. This method utilizes Lasswell's communication model to assign stakeholders the roles of indicators' providers, receivers, and experts based on defined objectives. Lasswell's model bolsters existing assessment frameworks by incorporating the sharing aspect among stakeholders that they lack.</div><div>The proposed method is used to select environmental performance indicators for monitoring rail infrastructure projects. These projects are inherently complex, involving multiple stakeholders with significant technical expertise across several long project phases.</div><div>By using this method, the resulting indicators not only reflect scientific soundness but also incorporate the knowledge and interests of all stakeholders involved. A key feature of this approach is the recognition that selecting environmental indicators is a ‘collaborative challenge’. This challenge can only be addressed through structured information exchange, allowing for a transition from environmental diagnosis to environmental monitoring of complex projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100295"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144588818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dynamic vs real time life cycle assessment 动态vs实时生命周期评估
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100296
Antonia Vyrkou , Maria Aryblia , Nikolaos Savvakis , Ingrid Nicacio , Owais Siddique , George Arampatzis , Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis
The term “conventional” or “static” Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is used to describe the traditional application of LCA for the environmental impact assessment of a given instance of a system, to differentiate it from the recently developed Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment (DLCA). The latter is defined as monitoring and assessing the environmental performance of a continuously changing system. However, the term “dynamic” has been interpreted differently in various studies, with the temporal aspect of the analysis being satisfied either with the use of timeseries of (historical/predicted) data or with a real-time data collection for the system in question. The focus of this review paper is: (a) to examine the implementation of DLCA by findings common themes, differences and challenges in its application to different sectors, and (b) identify and highlight the differences between dynamic assessment and real-time assessment.
The review has shown that in the last five years the published literature has grown, with the annual number of articles increasing from less than 30 (between 2015 and 2019) to 62 in 2023. In terms of the traditional LCA steps, the Dynamic Process Inventory is usually populated eiterh (a) with historical data for certain elementary flows and/or (b) using alternative scenarios for selected elementary flows. Dynamic Characterisation is only needed when the time horizon is longer than a decade, while Dynamic Systems had been mostly implemented in correlation with the Building Information Model (BIM). The sectors where DLCA has been predominantly used are: (a) buildings; (b) waste treatment and management; (c) agriculture; and (d) utilities (i.e. energy production and water supply).
On the contrary, the term “real-time LCA” is rarely used, with only a handful of published papers referring to it, but none of these implemented in a real-life industrial system. Although several studies agree that real-time assessment leads to improved accuracy, better insight to the process and time savings in the analysis, the effort required to implement it and the added value to the industrial plant, does not currently justify its wider implementation. However, in the era of Industry 4.0 and the digitization of industrial plants, there is an opportunity to incorporate the environmental impact assessment in the continuous monitoring of process industries.
“常规”或“静态”生命周期评估(LCA)一词用于描述LCA的传统应用,用于对系统的给定实例进行环境影响评估,以区别于最近发展的动态生命周期评估(DLCA)。后者被定义为监测和评估一个不断变化的系统的环境绩效。然而,“动态”一词在各种研究中有不同的解释,分析的时间方面要么满足于使用(历史/预测)数据的时间序列,要么满足于所讨论系统的实时数据收集。本检讨文件的重点是:(a)透过发现在不同界别应用DLCA的共同主题、差异和挑战,来检视DLCA的推行情况,以及(b)厘清和强调动态评估与实时评估之间的差异。该综述显示,在过去五年中,已发表的文献数量有所增长,每年的文章数量从2015年至2019年的不到30篇增加到2023年的62篇。就传统的LCA步骤而言,动态过程清单通常是(a)使用某些基本流的历史数据和/或(b)使用所选基本流的替代方案填充的。只有当时间跨度超过十年时才需要动态特性,而动态系统主要是与建筑信息模型(BIM)相关实施的。主要使用DLCA的界别有:(a)楼宇;(b)废物处理和管理;(c)农业;(d)公用事业(即能源生产和供水)。相反,“实时LCA”这个术语很少使用,只有少数发表的论文提到了它,但这些都没有在现实生活中的工业系统中实现。虽然几项研究都认为实时评估可以提高准确性,更好地了解过程,节省分析时间,但实施它所需的努力和工业工厂的附加值,目前还不能证明它的广泛实施是合理的。然而,在工业4.0和工业工厂数字化时代,有机会将环境影响评估纳入过程工业的持续监测中。
{"title":"Dynamic vs real time life cycle assessment","authors":"Antonia Vyrkou ,&nbsp;Maria Aryblia ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Savvakis ,&nbsp;Ingrid Nicacio ,&nbsp;Owais Siddique ,&nbsp;George Arampatzis ,&nbsp;Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100296","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100296","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The term “conventional” or “static” Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is used to describe the traditional application of LCA for the environmental impact assessment of a given instance of a system, to differentiate it from the recently developed Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment (DLCA). The latter is defined as monitoring and assessing the environmental performance of a continuously changing system. However, the term “dynamic” has been interpreted differently in various studies, with the temporal aspect of the analysis being satisfied either with the use of timeseries of (historical/predicted) data or with a real-time data collection for the system in question. The focus of this review paper is: (a) to examine the implementation of DLCA by findings common themes, differences and challenges in its application to different sectors, and (b) identify and highlight the differences between dynamic assessment and real-time assessment.</div><div>The review has shown that in the last five years the published literature has grown, with the annual number of articles increasing from less than 30 (between 2015 and 2019) to 62 in 2023. In terms of the traditional LCA steps, the Dynamic Process Inventory is usually populated eiterh (a) with historical data for certain elementary flows and/or (b) using alternative scenarios for selected elementary flows. Dynamic Characterisation is only needed when the time horizon is longer than a decade, while Dynamic Systems had been mostly implemented in correlation with the Building Information Model (BIM). The sectors where DLCA has been predominantly used are: (a) buildings; (b) waste treatment and management; (c) agriculture; and (d) utilities (i.e. energy production and water supply).</div><div>On the contrary, the term “real-time LCA” is rarely used, with only a handful of published papers referring to it, but none of these implemented in a real-life industrial system. Although several studies agree that real-time assessment leads to improved accuracy, better insight to the process and time savings in the analysis, the effort required to implement it and the added value to the industrial plant, does not currently justify its wider implementation. However, in the era of Industry 4.0 and the digitization of industrial plants, there is an opportunity to incorporate the environmental impact assessment in the continuous monitoring of process industries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100296"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144569736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methodological review of life cycle assessments of carbon capture and utilisation – Does modelling reflect purposes? 碳捕获和利用生命周期评估的方法回顾-模型是否反映了目的?
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-06-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100291
Evelina Nyqvist, Henrikke Baumann, Gulnara Shavalieva, Matty Janssen
Carbon dioxide capture and utilisation (CCU) is considered a climate change mitigation strategy and life cycle assessment (LCA) is often used to assess its decarbonisation potential. The current study investigates the understandability of the LCA studies of CCU systems in this context by reviewing 106 LCA studies of CCU systems on their methodologies. The results show a diversity in LCA studies performed. They studied a range of CCU products created from varying sources of carbon dioxide and had different industrial scopes. The majority of studies compare the climate change impact of the investigated CCU process to the conventional production systems or products. Of the 106 articles, 47 report a reduced and 27 claim a negative impact regardless of the source of captured carbon or the storage time of the CO2 in the product. Half of the reviewed studies did not report the goal with the LCA, and those who stated a goal seldom explained the purpose of the assessment. This made the methodological choices and results of the studies difficult to understand. For more understandable LCA studies of CCU systems, the modelling needs to reflect the purposes of the assessments. This includes considering the time aspects of when and for how long carbon is retained by the studied CCU systems and products. Furthermore, there is a need for improvement in both the reporting of LCA studies and the guidelines, especially regarding the reporting of the goal and how the goal definition phase is connected to the methodological decisions in the LCA study.
二氧化碳捕获和利用(CCU)被认为是一种减缓气候变化的战略,生命周期评估(LCA)通常用于评估其脱碳潜力。在此背景下,本研究通过回顾106项CCU系统的LCA研究及其方法,调查CCU系统LCA研究的可理解性。结果显示LCA研究的多样性。他们研究了一系列CCU产品,这些产品由不同来源的二氧化碳制成,具有不同的工业范围。大多数研究将所调查的CCU过程与传统生产系统或产品的气候变化影响进行了比较。在106篇文章中,无论捕获碳的来源或产品中二氧化碳的储存时间如何,47篇报告减少了,27篇声称产生了负面影响。被审查的研究中有一半没有报告LCA的目标,而那些有目标的研究很少解释评估的目的。这使得研究的方法选择和结果难以理解。为了更容易理解CCU系统的LCA研究,建模需要反映评估的目的。这包括考虑时间方面的碳被研究的CCU系统和产品保留的时间和时间。此外,在LCA研究报告和指导方针方面都需要改进,特别是在目标报告以及目标定义阶段如何与LCA研究中的方法决策相关联方面。
{"title":"Methodological review of life cycle assessments of carbon capture and utilisation – Does modelling reflect purposes?","authors":"Evelina Nyqvist,&nbsp;Henrikke Baumann,&nbsp;Gulnara Shavalieva,&nbsp;Matty Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100291","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100291","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon dioxide capture and utilisation (CCU) is considered a climate change mitigation strategy and life cycle assessment (LCA) is often used to assess its decarbonisation potential. The current study investigates the understandability of the LCA studies of CCU systems in this context by reviewing 106 LCA studies of CCU systems on their methodologies. The results show a diversity in LCA studies performed. They studied a range of CCU products created from varying sources of carbon dioxide and had different industrial scopes. The majority of studies compare the climate change impact of the investigated CCU process to the conventional production systems or products. Of the 106 articles, 47 report a reduced and 27 claim a negative impact regardless of the source of captured carbon or the storage time of the CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> in the product. Half of the reviewed studies did not report the goal with the LCA, and those who stated a goal seldom explained the purpose of the assessment. This made the methodological choices and results of the studies difficult to understand. For more understandable LCA studies of CCU systems, the modelling needs to reflect the purposes of the assessments. This includes considering the time aspects of when and for how long carbon is retained by the studied CCU systems and products. Furthermore, there is a need for improvement in both the reporting of LCA studies and the guidelines, especially regarding the reporting of the goal and how the goal definition phase is connected to the methodological decisions in the LCA study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100291"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144535116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond carbon footprint: practices and tools to implement Circular Economy in Swedish companies 超越碳足迹:瑞典公司实施循环经济的实践和工具
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100294
Mariana Cardoso Chrispim , Marie Mattsson , Pia Ulvenblad
Globally, the commitment of companies to Circular Economy (CE) is still limited. Mapping the circular practices performed by companies is a challenging and complex task and few empirical papers have explored CE implementation in companies. Based on interviews and analysis of company reports, we addressed in-depth the implementation of practices, targets, and assessment tools related to CE in ten Swedish companies. Only 10 circular practices out of 21 are implemented in at least 50% of the companies, indicating that the companies have just begun their transition to CE. The most common practices relate to waste reduction and resource efficiency (mainly energy). Barriers to collaboration are competition, keep confidentiality, small company size, lack of interest of other stakeholders, among others. So, there is a potential for increasing collaboration, especially with the municipality. The priority has been emissions reduction targets and the use of climate-focused tools (i.e., carbon footprint) while social aspects and circularity are less explored. We conclude that the monitoring of environmental performance is limited mainly to the use of resources and emissions. The low use of circularity tools is caused mainly by internal barriers such as lack of knowledge and shortage of resources. So, the companies should get more knowledge on CE assessment tools, include social indicators related to circular practices, and set targets for societal impact.
在全球范围内,企业对循环经济(CE)的承诺仍然有限。绘制公司执行的循环实践是一项具有挑战性和复杂的任务,很少有实证论文探讨了公司的CE实施。基于对公司报告的访谈和分析,我们深入探讨了十家瑞典公司中与CE相关的实践、目标和评估工具的实施情况。在21项循环实践中,只有10项在至少50%的公司中得到实施,这表明这些公司刚刚开始向CE过渡。最常见的做法是减少废物和提高资源效率(主要是能源)。合作的障碍是竞争、保密、公司规模小、其他利益相关者缺乏兴趣等等。因此,有可能增加合作,特别是与市政当局的合作。优先考虑的是减排目标和以气候为重点的工具(即碳足迹)的使用,而对社会方面和循环性的探索较少。环境绩效的监测主要局限于资源利用和排放。循环工具使用率低主要是由于缺乏知识和资源短缺等内部障碍造成的。因此,企业应该更多地了解环保评估工具,包括与循环实践相关的社会指标,并设定社会影响目标。
{"title":"Beyond carbon footprint: practices and tools to implement Circular Economy in Swedish companies","authors":"Mariana Cardoso Chrispim ,&nbsp;Marie Mattsson ,&nbsp;Pia Ulvenblad","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100294","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100294","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, the commitment of companies to Circular Economy (CE) is still limited. Mapping the circular practices performed by companies is a challenging and complex task and few empirical papers have explored CE implementation in companies. Based on interviews and analysis of company reports, we addressed in-depth the implementation of practices, targets, and assessment tools related to CE in ten Swedish companies. Only 10 circular practices out of 21 are implemented in at least 50% of the companies, indicating that the companies have just begun their transition to CE. The most common practices relate to waste reduction and resource efficiency (mainly energy). Barriers to collaboration are competition, keep confidentiality, small company size, lack of interest of other stakeholders, among others. So, there is a potential for increasing collaboration, especially with the municipality. The priority has been emissions reduction targets and the use of climate-focused tools (i.e., carbon footprint) while social aspects and circularity are less explored. We conclude that the monitoring of environmental performance is limited mainly to the use of resources and emissions. The low use of circularity tools is caused mainly by internal barriers such as lack of knowledge and shortage of resources. So, the companies should get more knowledge on CE assessment tools, include social indicators related to circular practices, and set targets for societal impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100294"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144548370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sustainability assessment of blood orange production in sicily through the application of the SAFA framework 通过应用SAFA框架对西西里岛血橙生产的可持续性进行评估
IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100293
Alessandro Scuderi, Gaetano Chinnici, Carla Zarbà, Mariarita Cammarata, Roberta Maria Gravagno
The Sicilian blood orange, a Protected Geographical Indication product, represents a significant production sector for the Sicilian territory. In this context, the objective of this paper was to conduct a sustainability assessment comparing the organic and the conventional production systems with the aim to identify their respective strengths and weaknesses. In order to achieve this objective, the Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems (SAFA), a framework developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in 2012 for the evaluation of sustainability across the agri-food value chain, was employed. No notable differences were identified between the organic and conventional production systems, although the organic farms demonstrated a better performance in the environmental dimension. This initial approach to the sustainability assessment of the Sicilian blood orange PGI (Protected Geographical Indication) represents a valuable foundation for promoting Sicilian blood oranges as a high-quality product, associated with the commitment to sustainable production. In evaluating the potential of the SAFA for sustainability assessment, this framework, with its holistic approach, offers a valuable tool for understanding the multifaceted aspects of sustainability. Indeed, this assessment enabled the formulation of recommendations for the enhancement of the overall sustainability performance of the citrus farms. However, the SAFA framework appears too complex to measure the sustainability performances of small and medium-sized farms, particularly with regard to the collection of quantitative data. Accordingly, certain adaptations were always required to more accurately assess this particular context.
西西里血橙是受保护的地理标志产品,代表了西西里领土的重要生产部门。在这方面,本文的目的是进行可持续性评估,比较有机生产系统和传统生产系统,以确定其各自的优势和劣势。为了实现这一目标,采用了粮食和农业系统可持续性评估(SAFA),这是粮食及农业组织(粮农组织)于2012年开发的一个框架,用于评估整个农业食品价值链的可持续性。尽管有机农场在环境维度上表现得更好,但有机生产系统与传统生产系统之间没有显著差异。这种对西西里血橙PGI(受保护地理标志)可持续性评估的初步方法为促进西西里血橙作为高质量产品的发展提供了宝贵的基础,并与可持续生产的承诺相联系。在评价可持续发展评价体系的潜力时,这一框架及其整体方法为了解可持续发展的多方面提供了宝贵的工具。事实上,这项评估能够为提高柑橘农场的整体可持续性绩效提出建议。然而,SAFA框架似乎过于复杂,无法衡量中小型农场的可持续性表现,特别是在收集定量数据方面。因此,为了更准确地评估这一特定环境,总是需要某些适应。
{"title":"Sustainability assessment of blood orange production in sicily through the application of the SAFA framework","authors":"Alessandro Scuderi,&nbsp;Gaetano Chinnici,&nbsp;Carla Zarbà,&nbsp;Mariarita Cammarata,&nbsp;Roberta Maria Gravagno","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100293","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100293","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Sicilian blood orange, a Protected Geographical Indication product, represents a significant production sector for the Sicilian territory. In this context, the objective of this paper was to conduct a sustainability assessment comparing the organic and the conventional production systems with the aim to identify their respective strengths and weaknesses. In order to achieve this objective, the <em>Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems</em> (SAFA), a framework developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in 2012 for the evaluation of sustainability across the agri-food value chain, was employed. No notable differences were identified between the organic and conventional production systems, although the organic farms demonstrated a better performance in the environmental dimension. This initial approach to the sustainability assessment of the Sicilian blood orange PGI (<em>Protected Geographical Indication</em>) represents a valuable foundation for promoting Sicilian blood oranges as a high-quality product, associated with the commitment to sustainable production. In evaluating the potential of the SAFA for sustainability assessment, this framework, with its holistic approach, offers a valuable tool for understanding the multifaceted aspects of sustainability. Indeed, this assessment enabled the formulation of recommendations for the enhancement of the overall sustainability performance of the citrus farms. However, the SAFA framework appears too complex to measure the sustainability performances of small and medium-sized farms, particularly with regard to the collection of quantitative data. Accordingly, certain adaptations were always required to more accurately assess this particular context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100293"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144330305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1