首页 > 最新文献

Utamax最新文献

英文 中文
Exploring Quantity and Diversity of Informal Digital Learning of English (IDLE): A Review of Selected Paper 非正式数字英语学习(IDLE)的数量与多样性探讨:论文选集综述
Pub Date : 2019-07-09 DOI: 10.31849/utamax.v1i1.2551
Nofita Nofita, Ratih Saltri Yudar, Mutia Sari Nursafira
This article reviews research on informal digital English (IDLE) learning that has increased in the field of English language teaching to other language speakers and computer-assisted language learning written by Ju Seong Lee (2019), entitled Quantity and Diversity of informal digital learning of English published by Language Learning & Technology. This present paper uses descriptive qualitative analysis in an attempt to understand how the quantity and diversity of IDLE can make a unique contribution to the English language outcomes of EFL learners from the researcher's perspective. Lee uses hierarchical linear regression analysis to show that IDLE Quantity, Age, and Major are significant predictors of two affective variables (Confidence and Pleasure), while IDLE Diversity and Major significantly predict productive language outcomes (Speaking and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge), score in the standard English Test (TOEIC), and one affective variable (Lack of Anxiety). This present article aims to review and discuss the findings on the strengths and the weaknesses found in Lee’s 2019 article. The article Lee made seems to possess a clear flow on how to explain these two types of education and make this article easy to understand. Therefore, the replication of Lee’s research is easy enough for similar research purposes.
本文回顾了Ju Seong Lee(2019)在英语语言教学和计算机辅助语言学习领域对非正式数字英语(IDLE)学习的研究,该研究发表在《语言学习与技术》杂志上,题为《英语非正式数字学习的数量和多样性》。本文采用描述性定性分析的方法,试图从研究者的角度来理解外语学习者的英语学习成绩如何受到外语学习者数量和多样性的独特影响。Lee使用层次线性回归分析表明,IDLE数量、年龄和专业是两个情感变量(信心和快乐)的显著预测因子,而IDLE多样性和专业显著预测生产性语言结果(口语和生产性词汇知识)、标准英语考试(托业)分数和一个情感变量(缺乏焦虑)。本文旨在回顾和讨论关于Lee 2019年文章中发现的优势和劣势的研究结果。李的文章似乎对如何解释这两种类型的教育有一个清晰的流程,使这篇文章易于理解。因此,对于类似的研究目的,复制李教授的研究是很容易的。
{"title":"Exploring Quantity and Diversity of Informal Digital Learning of English (IDLE): A Review of Selected Paper","authors":"Nofita Nofita, Ratih Saltri Yudar, Mutia Sari Nursafira","doi":"10.31849/utamax.v1i1.2551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i1.2551","url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews research on informal digital English (IDLE) learning that has increased in the field of English language teaching to other language speakers and computer-assisted language learning written by Ju Seong Lee (2019), entitled Quantity and Diversity of informal digital learning of English published by Language Learning & Technology. This present paper uses descriptive qualitative analysis in an attempt to understand how the quantity and diversity of IDLE can make a unique contribution to the English language outcomes of EFL learners from the researcher's perspective. Lee uses hierarchical linear regression analysis to show that IDLE Quantity, Age, and Major are significant predictors of two affective variables (Confidence and Pleasure), while IDLE Diversity and Major significantly predict productive language outcomes (Speaking and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge), score in the standard English Test (TOEIC), and one affective variable (Lack of Anxiety). This present article aims to review and discuss the findings on the strengths and the weaknesses found in Lee’s 2019 article. The article Lee made seems to possess a clear flow on how to explain these two types of education and make this article easy to understand. Therefore, the replication of Lee’s research is easy enough for similar research purposes.","PeriodicalId":34818,"journal":{"name":"Utamax","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89714682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Improving Reading Insights on Web Contents Based: A Survey on the Strategies Used by EFL Students 提高对网络内容的阅读洞察力:对英语学生阅读策略的调查
Pub Date : 2019-03-28 DOI: 10.31849/utamax.v1i2.5576
R. Lestari
Implementing strategies of content chosen on the internet is a core aspect of achieving goals in expanding reading material. This study aims to investigate what are the strategies used by students on extending reading web content. This research is in the form of a survey at the English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lancang Kuning. There were 95 out of 126 EFL students selected randomly as participants from reading class. A set of Likert-scale questionnaires, adopted from Mokhtari and Reichard (2002), was used to collect the data. It consisted of 30 questions divided into three strategies: Global Reading Strategies, Problem Solving Strategies, and Support Reading Strategies. To answer the research questions, descriptive statistics (SPSS 16) were used to analyze EFL students’ strategies on extending reading web content questionnaires. The findings reveal that students' dominant strategy is the Problem Solving Strategies got from the mean score of 4.11 and a Standard Deviation of 0.98. It can be categorized into a high level. It means that the majority of students have a homogenous strategy for extending reading web content. The study also reveals that students believe that the content on the internet somehow is the right source of learning. Therefore this study highlighted that students have implemented a reading strategy to make them easier to understand a text's contents. 
网络内容选择策略的实施是实现拓展阅读目标的核心环节。本研究旨在探讨学生在延伸阅读网页内容时所采用的策略。本研究在昆宁澜沧江大学教师培训与教育学院英语系进行调查。从126名英语学生中随机抽取95名作为阅读班的参与者。采用Mokhtari和Reichard(2002)的李克特量表问卷收集数据。它由30个问题组成,分为三种策略:全局阅读策略、问题解决策略和支持阅读策略。为了回答研究问题,使用描述性统计(SPSS 16)分析了英语学生在扩展阅读网页内容问卷上的策略。结果表明,学生的优势策略是问题解决策略,平均分为4.11,标准差为0.98。它可以被分类为一个高层次。这意味着大多数学生都有一个相同的策略来扩展阅读网络内容。该研究还显示,学生们认为互联网上的内容在某种程度上是正确的学习来源。因此,本研究强调学生已经实施了一种阅读策略,使他们更容易理解文本的内容。
{"title":"Improving Reading Insights on Web Contents Based: A Survey on the Strategies Used by EFL Students","authors":"R. Lestari","doi":"10.31849/utamax.v1i2.5576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i2.5576","url":null,"abstract":"Implementing strategies of content chosen on the internet is a core aspect of achieving goals in expanding reading material. This study aims to investigate what are the strategies used by students on extending reading web content. This research is in the form of a survey at the English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lancang Kuning. There were 95 out of 126 EFL students selected randomly as participants from reading class. A set of Likert-scale questionnaires, adopted from Mokhtari and Reichard (2002), was used to collect the data. It consisted of 30 questions divided into three strategies: Global Reading Strategies, Problem Solving Strategies, and Support Reading Strategies. To answer the research questions, descriptive statistics (SPSS 16) were used to analyze EFL students’ strategies on extending reading web content questionnaires. The findings reveal that students' dominant strategy is the Problem Solving Strategies got from the mean score of 4.11 and a Standard Deviation of 0.98. It can be categorized into a high level. It means that the majority of students have a homogenous strategy for extending reading web content. The study also reveals that students believe that the content on the internet somehow is the right source of learning. Therefore this study highlighted that students have implemented a reading strategy to make them easier to understand a text's contents. ","PeriodicalId":34818,"journal":{"name":"Utamax","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81791960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Phonics Reading Strategy: An Alternative Strategy to Improve EYL Students’ Reading Skill 自然拼读策略:提高英语阅读能力的另一种策略
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.31849/utamax.v1i2.6353
Fitri Arniati, S. Ningsih, Devianti Devianti, Arma Amir Hamzah
The introduction of English to young learners has been implemented for a long time with various strategies and approaches. However, not all of strategies the teacher used were successful in being applied in the classroom. Based on pre-observation, the students’ reading interest is low due to difficulty understanding the text. They have difficulty understanding sentences, and students can only find the meaning of the sentence or only understand the text content's outline. The present study aims to determine whether reading phonics strategy can improve students reading skill in second-grade of SMP Negeri 2 Sumarorong. The study used a pre-experimental method in one class given a pre-test and a final test. The population is the second-grade students and this study used a total sampling technique. The result of the data shows that the mean value in the final test is greater than the mean value of the initial test (79.52>60.800), and the t-test value is greater than the t-table value (12.046>2.046) at the level of increase of 0.05, with degrees of freedom (df) 24. This increase can also be seen from the post-test result, which is greater than the pre-test score. This evidence highlighted phonics reading strategy can improve students reading skill.
长期以来,少儿英语教学一直采用各种策略和方法进行。然而,并不是老师使用的所有策略都在课堂上得到了成功的应用。根据预观察,学生的阅读兴趣较低,原因是理解文本困难。他们很难理解句子,学生只能找到句子的意思或只理解文本内容的大纲。本研究旨在探讨阅读语音策略是否能提高小学二年级学生的阅读技能。该研究采用预实验方法,在一个班级进行预测试和期末测试。总体为二年级学生,本研究采用全抽样方法。数据结果表明,最终检验的均值大于初始检验的均值(79.52>60.800),t检验值在增加0.05的水平上大于t表值(12.046>2.046),自由度(df)为24。这种增长也可以从后测结果中看出,后测结果大于前测分数。这一证据表明,自然拼读策略可以提高学生的阅读能力。
{"title":"Phonics Reading Strategy: An Alternative Strategy to Improve EYL Students’ Reading Skill","authors":"Fitri Arniati, S. Ningsih, Devianti Devianti, Arma Amir Hamzah","doi":"10.31849/utamax.v1i2.6353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i2.6353","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of English to young learners has been implemented for a long time with various strategies and approaches. However, not all of strategies the teacher used were successful in being applied in the classroom. Based on pre-observation, the students’ reading interest is low due to difficulty understanding the text. They have difficulty understanding sentences, and students can only find the meaning of the sentence or only understand the text content's outline. The present study aims to determine whether reading phonics strategy can improve students reading skill in second-grade of SMP Negeri 2 Sumarorong. The study used a pre-experimental method in one class given a pre-test and a final test. The population is the second-grade students and this study used a total sampling technique. The result of the data shows that the mean value in the final test is greater than the mean value of the initial test (79.52>60.800), and the t-test value is greater than the t-table value (12.046>2.046) at the level of increase of 0.05, with degrees of freedom (df) 24. This increase can also be seen from the post-test result, which is greater than the pre-test score. This evidence highlighted phonics reading strategy can improve students reading skill.","PeriodicalId":34818,"journal":{"name":"Utamax","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77536146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Human Rights for Women's Development in Multidimensional: A Step towards Gender Equality in Education 多维妇女人权促进发展:迈向教育性别平等的一步
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.31849/utamax.v1i2.5876
Andrey Shastri
Women's educational human rights and gender equality is one of the burning topics nowadays. Following the gender equality framework proposed by United Nations in its Millennium Summit in 2000 declared "Gender equality and women empowerment". This present study tries to review gender equality for women in many aspects, including the major concern in this review, i.e., education and human right. After analyzing several documents in the net during the collection period, this study sees that women have achieved a lot. However, yes still they are lagging in terms of equality in education and human right. The fact showed women are far lagging and leave alone on the question of gender equality. The present paper explores and highlighted these issues as the central questions related to women's rights and also attempts to wrestle with the few challenges that faced by the women education system in India as a specific example. At last, this paper also try to highlight some strategy as to upgrade the status of women in society, ever since this study believes that Educating a woman will uplifts her life as well as the quality of the nation.
妇女教育、人权与性别平等是当今社会的热点话题之一。根据联合国在2000年千年首脑会议上提出的“性别平等与妇女赋权”的性别平等框架。本研究试图在许多方面审查妇女的性别平等,包括本审查的主要关切,即教育和人权。通过对收集期间网上的几份文献的分析,本研究发现女性已经取得了很多成就。然而,他们在教育平等和人权方面仍然落后。事实表明,在性别平等问题上,妇女远远落后于其他国家。本文将这些问题作为与妇女权利相关的核心问题进行探讨和突出,并试图以印度妇女教育系统为具体例子,解决其面临的少数挑战。最后,本文还试图强调一些提高妇女在社会中的地位的策略,因为本研究认为教育妇女会提高她的生活水平,也会提高国家的素质。
{"title":"Human Rights for Women's Development in Multidimensional: A Step towards Gender Equality in Education","authors":"Andrey Shastri","doi":"10.31849/utamax.v1i2.5876","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i2.5876","url":null,"abstract":"Women's educational human rights and gender equality is one of the burning topics nowadays. Following the gender equality framework proposed by United Nations in its Millennium Summit in 2000 declared \"Gender equality and women empowerment\". This present study tries to review gender equality for women in many aspects, including the major concern in this review, i.e., education and human right. After analyzing several documents in the net during the collection period, this study sees that women have achieved a lot. However, yes still they are lagging in terms of equality in education and human right. The fact showed women are far lagging and leave alone on the question of gender equality. The present paper explores and highlighted these issues as the central questions related to women's rights and also attempts to wrestle with the few challenges that faced by the women education system in India as a specific example. At last, this paper also try to highlight some strategy as to upgrade the status of women in society, ever since this study believes that Educating a woman will uplifts her life as well as the quality of the nation.","PeriodicalId":34818,"journal":{"name":"Utamax","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72382415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Context of Education on Teaching English between Indonesia and Singapore: A Review of Basic Elements 印尼与新加坡英语教学的教育语境:基本要素回顾
Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.31849/utamax.v1i2.6226
Kurniawan Kurniawan, R. Rusdinal, A. Ananda, N. Gistituati
This review paper aims at giving a short outline regarding the examination of Teaching English Language instructing and teaching English Language as a Foreign Language (TEFL) between Indonesia and Singapore. The review based its analysis on a few elements which affect instructing and learning TEFL in the Indonesian context and Singapore, i.e., educator capabilities, teaching English language capability, homeroom size, understudies' inspiration, study hall situated learning, and restricted wellsprings of learning. The review highlighted that these are the factors which give impact on instructing and learning achievement. The review conducted its analysis under few limitations at work between language strategy and language encouraging study hall rehearsed in the two nations. This paper points out that understudies have different inspirations and foundation qualities altogether, making it hard to plan as an asset to a solitary educational program which will suit all (or at least most) understudies of the nation. Moreover, financial support for educators, resourcing, and the probability of huge class capacity in the Indonesian context appear differently in relation to Singapore. Low instructor compensations in Indonesia cause most educators to work in extra positions that lessen the time they can allot for exercise arrangement, endeavors to create practices and undertaking advancement by upgrading expert information, whereas instructors in Singapore are doing the full education time. Finally, the strategy and educational plan legislative issues have a significant impact on TEFL examination, thus understanding and correctly implementing them needs to be a requirement to language learning.
本文旨在对印尼和新加坡之间的英语教学和英语作为外语教学(TEFL)考试进行简要概述。本文分析了影响印尼和新加坡英语教学的几个因素,即教育工作者的能力、英语教学能力、教室规模、学生的激励、自习室的学习和学习的限制。这些都是影响教学成果的因素。在两国的语言策略和语言鼓励学习室排练之间的工作中,该评论进行了一些限制。本文指出,学生的灵感和基础素质各不相同,因此很难规划出一个适合全国所有(至少是大多数)学生的单独教育项目。此外,对教育工作者的财政支持、资源和印尼背景下巨大班级容量的可能性与新加坡有所不同。在印度尼西亚,较低的教师薪酬导致大多数教育工作者在额外的岗位上工作,减少了他们可以分配给练习安排的时间,努力创造实践,并通过升级专业信息来实现进步,而新加坡的教师则是完成全部教育时间。最后,战略和教育计划立法问题对TEFL考试有重大影响,因此理解和正确实施这些问题是语言学习的必要条件。
{"title":"The Context of Education on Teaching English between Indonesia and Singapore: A Review of Basic Elements","authors":"Kurniawan Kurniawan, R. Rusdinal, A. Ananda, N. Gistituati","doi":"10.31849/utamax.v1i2.6226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i2.6226","url":null,"abstract":"This review paper aims at giving a short outline regarding the examination of Teaching English Language instructing and teaching English Language as a Foreign Language (TEFL) between Indonesia and Singapore. The review based its analysis on a few elements which affect instructing and learning TEFL in the Indonesian context and Singapore, i.e., educator capabilities, teaching English language capability, homeroom size, understudies' inspiration, study hall situated learning, and restricted wellsprings of learning. The review highlighted that these are the factors which give impact on instructing and learning achievement. The review conducted its analysis under few limitations at work between language strategy and language encouraging study hall rehearsed in the two nations. This paper points out that understudies have different inspirations and foundation qualities altogether, making it hard to plan as an asset to a solitary educational program which will suit all (or at least most) understudies of the nation. Moreover, financial support for educators, resourcing, and the probability of huge class capacity in the Indonesian context appear differently in relation to Singapore. Low instructor compensations in Indonesia cause most educators to work in extra positions that lessen the time they can allot for exercise arrangement, endeavors to create practices and undertaking advancement by upgrading expert information, whereas instructors in Singapore are doing the full education time. Finally, the strategy and educational plan legislative issues have a significant impact on TEFL examination, thus understanding and correctly implementing them needs to be a requirement to language learning.","PeriodicalId":34818,"journal":{"name":"Utamax","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75471618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Utamax
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1