首页 > 最新文献

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies最新文献

英文 中文
Using the Master’s Tools to Dismantle the Master’s House: The Fountainhead Reads Doctor Faustus 用大师的工具拆除大师的房子:喷泉头读浮士德博士
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-08-08 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0028
Alison Gerard
ABSTRACT:Largely by the use of allegory, Ayn Rand’s novel The Fountainhead repurposes and reinterprets the religious morality of Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus to espouse an Objectivist, rather than theist, view of salvation and damnation. The Faustian narrative no longer belongs to Faustus alone, but is read against itself in order to theorize that giving up one’s ego and independence, rather than giving up one’s membership to the societal collective, is the straightest road to perdition.
摘要:艾恩·兰德的小说《源泉》在很大程度上运用了寓言手法,对克里斯托弗·马洛的《浮士德医生》中的宗教道德进行了重新定位和阐释,以支持一种客观主义而非有神论的救赎和诅咒观。浮士德的叙事不再只属于浮士德一个人,而是被解读为与自己相悖,目的是理论上放弃自我和独立,而不是放弃社会集体的成员资格,是通往灭亡的最直接的道路。
{"title":"Using the Master’s Tools to Dismantle the Master’s House: The Fountainhead Reads Doctor Faustus","authors":"Alison Gerard","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0028","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Largely by the use of allegory, Ayn Rand’s novel The Fountainhead repurposes and reinterprets the religious morality of Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus to espouse an Objectivist, rather than theist, view of salvation and damnation. The Faustian narrative no longer belongs to Faustus alone, but is read against itself in order to theorize that giving up one’s ego and independence, rather than giving up one’s membership to the societal collective, is the straightest road to perdition.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"28 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44888129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On Life and Value within Objectivist Ethics 论客观主义伦理学中的生命与价值
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-08-08 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0055
Kathleen Touchstone
ABSTRACT:This article considers the meanings of “life” within Objectivist ethics. It distinguishes between life lived moment to moment (a flow concept) and life-as-a-whole (a stock concept). It examines life’s finality as related to life being the ultimate value. It questions whether one “lives to consume” or “consumes to live” from a desert island perspective. It discusses what one’s whole life entails within the context of decision making. It looks at decisions between competing values. Finally, it discusses the distinction between ethical and ethically neutral actions and suggests ways in which inquiries regarding these may be approached.
摘要:本文探讨了客观主义伦理学中“生命”的含义。它区分了生活的瞬间(流动概念)和生活的整体(存量概念)。它考察了生命的终结性,认为生命是终极价值。从荒岛的角度来看,它质疑一个人是“为了消费而生活”还是“为了生活而消费”。它讨论了在决策的背景下,一个人的一生需要什么。它着眼于相互竞争的价值观之间的决策。最后,它讨论了道德行为和道德中立行为之间的区别,并提出了处理这些问题的方法。
{"title":"On Life and Value within Objectivist Ethics","authors":"Kathleen Touchstone","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0055","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article considers the meanings of “life” within Objectivist ethics. It distinguishes between life lived moment to moment (a flow concept) and life-as-a-whole (a stock concept). It examines life’s finality as related to life being the ultimate value. It questions whether one “lives to consume” or “consumes to live” from a desert island perspective. It discusses what one’s whole life entails within the context of decision making. It looks at decisions between competing values. Finally, it discusses the distinction between ethical and ethically neutral actions and suggests ways in which inquiries regarding these may be approached.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"55 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48852062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Egoism and Others 利己主义与他人
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-08-08 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0084
Merlin Jetton
ABSTRACT:Ayn Rand was a strong and influential advocate of self-interest, of ethical egoism. What does her version of egoism mean in practical terms pertaining to interactions with other people generally other than not violating their rights and not committing fraud? This article explores that question with special attention to trust and cooperation. Ayn Rand said little about trust and cooperation in her ethics, but these are important aspects of living a productive life.
摘要:安·兰德是一位强有力的、有影响力的利己主义和伦理利己主义倡导者。除了不侵犯他人的权利和不进行欺诈之外,她对利己主义的理解在实践中意味着什么?本文探讨了这个问题,并特别关注信任与合作。安·兰德在她的道德规范中几乎没有提到信任和合作,但这些都是富有成效的生活的重要方面。
{"title":"Egoism and Others","authors":"Merlin Jetton","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0084","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Ayn Rand was a strong and influential advocate of self-interest, of ethical egoism. What does her version of egoism mean in practical terms pertaining to interactions with other people generally other than not violating their rights and not committing fraud? This article explores that question with special attention to trust and cooperation. Ayn Rand said little about trust and cooperation in her ethics, but these are important aspects of living a productive life.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"84 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41509265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Not Enough Primary Categories in Peikoff’s DIM? Salutary Eclecticism and an ACID Test Peikoff的DIM中没有足够的主要类别?有益的折衷主义和ACID测试
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-08-08 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0098
Roger E. Bissell
ABSTRACT:The author reprises his review of The DIM Hypothesis by arguing for an expansion and revision of Leonard Peikoff’s model to include not three, but four primary positions regarding integration (aka “DIM modes”): Integration, Disintegration, Abstract Misintegration, and Concrete Misintegration—and to include not just two mixtures of those primary positions, but twelve. He offers it as a work in progress and a remedy to the over-restrictiveness and resulting misrepresentations of various philosophers by Peikoff’s version of the model.
摘要:作者通过对Leonard Peikoff的模型进行扩展和修订,重新回顾了他对DIM假说的回顾,以包括关于整合的不是三种,而是四种主要立场(又名“DIM模式”):整合、解体、抽象错整合和具体错整合,并包括这些主要立场的不仅仅是两种混合,而是12种。他认为这是一项正在进行的工作,是对佩科夫模型版本对各种哲学家的过度限制和由此产生的误解的一种补救。
{"title":"Not Enough Primary Categories in Peikoff’s DIM? Salutary Eclecticism and an ACID Test","authors":"Roger E. Bissell","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0098","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The author reprises his review of The DIM Hypothesis by arguing for an expansion and revision of Leonard Peikoff’s model to include not three, but four primary positions regarding integration (aka “DIM modes”): Integration, Disintegration, Abstract Misintegration, and Concrete Misintegration—and to include not just two mixtures of those primary positions, but twelve. He offers it as a work in progress and a remedy to the over-restrictiveness and resulting misrepresentations of various philosophers by Peikoff’s version of the model.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"104 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43933062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ayn Rand’s Companions 安·兰德的同伴
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-08-08 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0105
F. Seddon
ABSTRACT:This essay reviews a recent book in the Blackwell Companions to Philosophy series: A Companion to Ayn Rand, edited by Gregory Salmieri and the late Allan Gotthelf. The author expresses his discontent with the volume’s exclusion of many contributors who are not affiliated with the Ayn Rand Institute. He is displeased, as well, by the lack of any essays of a critical nature, which is a hallmark of other Companion-type works. His review focuses on six (out of eighteen) key essays in this volume: (1) Gregory Salmieri on both values and epistemology; (2) John David Lewis and Salmieri’s discussion of Rand’s political and cultural commentary; (3) Allan Gotthelf on the morality of life; (4) Harry Binswanger on aesthetics; (5) Jason Rheins on the Objectivist metaphysics; and (6) James Lennox on Rand’s view of the history of philosophy.
摘要:本文回顾了布莱克威尔《哲学伴侣》系列中最近出版的一本书:由格雷戈里·萨尔米耶里和已故的艾伦·戈特尔夫共同编辑的《安·兰德伴侣》。作者对该书排除了许多与安·兰德研究所无关的撰稿人表示不满。他也很不高兴,因为没有任何批评性质的文章,这是其他同伴类型作品的标志。他的评论集中在本卷18篇关键论文中的6篇:(1)格里高利·萨尔米耶里对价值和认识论的论述;(2)约翰·大卫·刘易斯和萨尔米耶里对兰德政治文化评论的讨论;(3)艾伦·哥特尔夫论人生道德;(4)宾斯旺格论美学;(5)杰森·莱茵论客观主义形而上学(6)詹姆斯·伦诺克斯对兰德哲学史的看法。
{"title":"Ayn Rand’s Companions","authors":"F. Seddon","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0105","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay reviews a recent book in the Blackwell Companions to Philosophy series: A Companion to Ayn Rand, edited by Gregory Salmieri and the late Allan Gotthelf. The author expresses his discontent with the volume’s exclusion of many contributors who are not affiliated with the Ayn Rand Institute. He is displeased, as well, by the lack of any essays of a critical nature, which is a hallmark of other Companion-type works. His review focuses on six (out of eighteen) key essays in this volume: (1) Gregory Salmieri on both values and epistemology; (2) John David Lewis and Salmieri’s discussion of Rand’s political and cultural commentary; (3) Allan Gotthelf on the morality of life; (4) Harry Binswanger on aesthetics; (5) Jason Rheins on the Objectivist metaphysics; and (6) James Lennox on Rand’s view of the history of philosophy.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"105 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41616775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Do We Need to Know? 我们需要知道什么?
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2018-08-08 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0118
R. Campbell
ABSTRACT:How We Know is intended as a summary (and a modest extension) of Objectivist epistemology. Binswanger’s treatment of a wide range of epistemological issues is examined. Because his theory of propositions is inadequate and his philosophy of mind is an extreme form of dualism, Binswanger has added little to previous efforts by “official” Objectivists. As a work of epistemology in the broad sense, Binswanger’s effort is fatally impaired. It is undone by his bifurcation between consciousness and the physics of the brain, which, if accepted, would largely deprive psychology and even computer science of their subject matter.
摘要:《我们如何知道》是对客观主义认识论的总结(以及适度的延伸)。宾斯旺格对广泛的认识论问题的处理进行了审查。因为他的命题理论是不充分的,他的心灵哲学是二元论的一种极端形式,宾斯旺格对“官方”客观主义者之前的努力几乎没有贡献。作为广义的认识论著作,宾斯旺格的努力受到了致命的损害。他把意识和大脑的物理学分开,如果被接受,这将在很大程度上剥夺心理学甚至计算机科学的研究对象。
{"title":"What Do We Need to Know?","authors":"R. Campbell","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0118","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:How We Know is intended as a summary (and a modest extension) of Objectivist epistemology. Binswanger’s treatment of a wide range of epistemological issues is examined. Because his theory of propositions is inadequate and his philosophy of mind is an extreme form of dualism, Binswanger has added little to previous efforts by “official” Objectivists. As a work of epistemology in the broad sense, Binswanger’s effort is fatally impaired. It is undone by his bifurcation between consciousness and the physics of the brain, which, if accepted, would largely deprive psychology and even computer science of their subject matter.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"118 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44667713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The New Type of Hero in Ayn Rand's Novels and Its Historical Roots 安小说中的新型英雄及其历史根源
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2017-12-02 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0275
A. Grigorovskaya
ABSTRACT:This article examines the new type of hero created by Ayn Rand and finds its roots in Chernyshevsky's "new human." Rand's characters share such features as extremism, asceticism, escapism, and the desire to transform the world. Moreover, Rand's heroes exhibit the self-building and "wholeness" traits of the "superhuman" as found in myths and in Renaissance and Masonic ideas.
摘要:本文考察了艾因·兰德塑造的新型英雄,并从车尔尼雪夫斯基的“新人类”中找到了其根源。兰德笔下的人物具有极端主义、禁欲主义、逃避现实和改造世界的欲望等特征。此外,兰德笔下的英雄展现了神话、文艺复兴和共济会思想中“超人”的自我建设和“完整性”特征。
{"title":"The New Type of Hero in Ayn Rand's Novels and Its Historical Roots","authors":"A. Grigorovskaya","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0275","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article examines the new type of hero created by Ayn Rand and finds its roots in Chernyshevsky's \"new human.\" Rand's characters share such features as extremism, asceticism, escapism, and the desire to transform the world. Moreover, Rand's heroes exhibit the self-building and \"wholeness\" traits of the \"superhuman\" as found in myths and in Renaissance and Masonic ideas.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"275 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47219177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The Objective-Subjective Dichotomy and Rand's Trichotomy 主客观二分法与兰德三分法
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2017-12-02 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0227
Arnold Baise
ABSTRACT:The term "objective" has both a metaphysical and an epistemological meaning, and each of these meanings gives rise to a corresponding objective-subjective dichotomy. A formal definition of (epistemological) objectivity is given, and this clarifies the nature of the epistemological dichotomy. These dichotomies are represented by classes of existents, and a Venn-type diagram is used to illustrate the relationship between them. It is shown that the class of all existents can be partitioned into three mutually exclusive and exhaustive classes, which correspond to Rand's intrinsic-subjective-objective trichotomy.
摘要:“客观”一词既有形而上学的意义,又有认识论的意义,每一种意义都产生相应的客观-主观二分法。给出了(认识论)客观性的正式定义,这澄清了认识论二分法的本质。这些二分法由存在的类表示,并使用维恩型图来说明它们之间的关系。结果表明,所有存在物的类可以划分为三个互斥的穷举类,这符合兰德的内在-主观-客观三分法。
{"title":"The Objective-Subjective Dichotomy and Rand's Trichotomy","authors":"Arnold Baise","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0227","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The term \"objective\" has both a metaphysical and an epistemological meaning, and each of these meanings gives rise to a corresponding objective-subjective dichotomy. A formal definition of (epistemological) objectivity is given, and this clarifies the nature of the epistemological dichotomy. These dichotomies are represented by classes of existents, and a Venn-type diagram is used to illustrate the relationship between them. It is shown that the class of all existents can be partitioned into three mutually exclusive and exhaustive classes, which correspond to Rand's intrinsic-subjective-objective trichotomy.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"227 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44970696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Profit Maximization Does Not Necessitate Profit Prioritization 利润最大化并不意味着利润优先化
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2017-12-02 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0201
Robert White
ABSTRACT:One of the grounds on which profit maximization has been morally condemned is the claim that businessmen are led by the logic of profit maximization to prioritize profit above all other values, including human life. Thus, while business critics claim that they object to profit maximization, what, at least some of them, in fact object to is profit prioritization. Drawing upon Ayn Rand's distinction between the intrinsic and objective theories of value, this article unpackages profit maximization and profit prioritization, arguing that businessmen can maximize profit without having to prioritize profit above all other values.
摘要:利润最大化在道德上受到谴责的理由之一是,商人在利润最大化的逻辑下,将利润置于包括人类生命在内的所有其他价值之上。因此,尽管商业评论家声称他们反对利润最大化,但事实上,至少其中一些人反对的是利润优先化。根据Ayn Rand对内在价值理论和客观价值理论的区分,本文对利润最大化和利润优先化进行了包装,认为商人可以实现利润最大化,而不必将利润置于所有其他价值之上。
{"title":"Profit Maximization Does Not Necessitate Profit Prioritization","authors":"Robert White","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0201","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:One of the grounds on which profit maximization has been morally condemned is the claim that businessmen are led by the logic of profit maximization to prioritize profit above all other values, including human life. Thus, while business critics claim that they object to profit maximization, what, at least some of them, in fact object to is profit prioritization. Drawing upon Ayn Rand's distinction between the intrinsic and objective theories of value, this article unpackages profit maximization and profit prioritization, arguing that businessmen can maximize profit without having to prioritize profit above all other values.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"201 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43919730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When "A Is Not A": Reflections on a Conversation 当“A不是A”时:对话反思
Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2017-12-02 DOI: 10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0238
Kathleen Touchstone
ABSTRACT:The author addresses speech restrictions on campuses, the axiom "A is A" as it applies to men and women, Roe v. Wade and its effect on examining the definition of personhood, and how this examination may have contributed to the anti-conceptual mentality that was already under way on campuses and elsewhere.
摘要:作者论述了校园言论限制、适用于男性和女性的公理“A即A”、罗诉韦德案及其对人格定义的影响,以及这种审查可能如何助长了校园和其他地方已经存在的反概念心态。
{"title":"When \"A Is Not A\": Reflections on a Conversation","authors":"Kathleen Touchstone","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0238","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The author addresses speech restrictions on campuses, the axiom \"A is A\" as it applies to men and women, Roe v. Wade and its effect on examining the definition of personhood, and how this examination may have contributed to the anti-conceptual mentality that was already under way on campuses and elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"238 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49319410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1