This article is part of a series of three that detail the relationship that exists between the competency domains of patient safety, clinical communication with specialized health training; as well as pointing out the synergies and the enhancing effect that exists between them through their topical aspects: the clinical error, the difficult patient and the critical incident. This article focuses on medical error, pointing out its motivating effect on the resident and how to use it formatively in real situations when things do not go well in the consultation. Because medical error is a very broad topic, this article focuses on content related to the training and motivation of residents.
Humanities are seen as both valuable and, at the same time, as soft, vague or prone to confusion disciplines. This paper exposes a broad view of how medical humanities education can be approached searching rigor. It aims to present a text that can be useful in this type of teaching. To this purpose, key elements from the biomedical literature are presented and, in addition, the Humanities Training Program of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Francisco de Vitoria is shown. The first part included the organizational context, the expected learning outcomes and the curricular contents. In this second part, the learning and teaching experiences, the forms of student assessment and those of the continuous quality improvement process are presented.
Neurological diseases are highly prevalent, with a high burden of morbidity, mortality and quality of life compromised. Physicians with neurology training are required. Medical education is confronted with the challenge of neurophobia, characterized by non-neurologist doctors who are afraid to care for the neurological pathology, to the point of not attempting to make a diagnostic approach, omitting the neurological examination or initiating early referral to the neurologist. There are questionnaires to identify neurophobia, which is present in up to half of medical students. Neurophobia constitutes an urgent call for medical education.
The scope of medical education (ME) as an autonomous field of study is still under debate. The present study aimed to identify publications addressing the topic of ME, published in international medical journals, by Portuguese authors, alone or in collaboration with foreign colleagues.
Publications were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science, between 2013 and 2022. Each publication was identified by title, name, and affiliation of the corresponding author. Affiliation of all authors was also taken into consideration to detect networks. Titles were used to identify subjects, complemented by keywords and abstract. Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank indexed journals in the education category were identified and from these ME journals were selected.
We chose 29 journals from which 17 had publications from Portuguese’s authors in a total of 80 publications.
The top journals in terms of productivity were BMC Medical Education, Medical Teacher, and Advances in Health Sciences Education. The Portuguese international cooperation involved Europe (United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, and Ireland), North America (USA and Canada) and Oceania (Australia). Outside the Northen Hemisphere, cooperation involved mostly Brazil. Nationally, the dominant networks involved the Universities of Porto and Minho.
Five core areas were identified namely “medical education”, “medical student”, “health care personnel”, “medical school”, and “undergraduate medical education”.
Despite the limitations of this study because the search was only focused on ME journals it showed a trend towards internationalisation of some Portuguese authors, particularly those who were also involved in established national networks.