Japanese Journal of Allergology最新文献

Cedar pollen is known as a typical allergen that causes various allergic symptoms in the nasal mucosa, conjunctiva, and skin. However, inflammation of the vulvar mucosa due to sensitization to cedar pollen is not well-known. We experienced two cases in which the detection of cedar pollen during microscopic urine sediment examination led to the diagnosis of allergic vulvovaginitis caused by cedar pollen. The cases involved a 4-year-old girl and a 10-year-old girl. In both cases, the patients presented with chief complaints of pruritis in the vulva and insomnia due to frequent urination during the season of cedar pollen dissemination. Both patients were afebrile. No inflammatory skin changes such as erythema, swelling, or non-purulent discharge from mucous membranes of the vulva were observed. Microscopic urine sediment examination revealed large amounts of shed cedar pollen. The patients' conditions improved after treatment with oral antihistamines and instruction to dry their underwear indoors. Follow-up blood tests revealed high levels of specific anti-IgE antibodies to cedar pollen, thus confirming a diagnosis of allergic vulvovaginitis due to cedar pollen. Cedar pollen can cause allergic vulvovaginitis. Microscopic urine sediment examination is useful, and when combined with specific IgE antibody testing, leads to an appropriate diagnosis. This disease should also be considered in patients with complaints of vulvar discomfort during the season of cedar pollen dissemination.

Background: Although paramedics can use adrenaline autoinjectors (AAIs) during their duties, the actual conditions of their use and the challenges faced remain unclear. We investigated the actual situation and issues pertaining to creating an environment in which paramedics can operate AAIs more effectively.

Methods: A web-based survey was conducted among paramedics who participated in a web-based training session related to their latest knowledge on food allergies and emergency responses in 2022. The survey items included practice and training environments, practices of AAI administration, and regarding AAI administration.

Results: Seventy paramedics responded to the survey. Twenty-eight respondents (40%) had experienced cases in which they wished they had an AAI in their work to date, but only one had actually administered one. Thirty-four (49%) indicated that it would be good to have an AAI in the ambulance at all times; 48 (69%) were not concerned about the use of AAI, and the level of concern about its use was significantly related to length of service. The study also revealed that paramedics do not have an adequate training environment regarding AAI.

Conclusion: Few paramedics have experience in administering AAI, although they are aware of the need for it. For more effective use of AAI, it is necessary to establish a training environment to familiarize paramedics with anaphylaxis and an environment that enables them to use AAI promptly in the field.

Background: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research.

Methods: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants.

Results: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers.

Conclusion: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.