Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.016
Mason A. Hill BS, Jarett D. Jones BS, Matthew VandeHei MD, Justin Purnell MD, Nikolai Schnittke MD, PhD, Sara Damewood MD, Hani I. Kuttab MD
Objective
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the prehospital setting has rapidly expanded, including helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). A more robust understanding of the use of prehospital POCUS and its impact on patient management is needed. The purpose of this study is to: 1) evaluate the applications of prehospital POCUS examinations, 2) assess physician accuracy in interpretation and the acceptability of the quality of performed exams, and 3) evaluate self-reported alterations in patient management.
Methods
This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients aged >18 years transported via HEMS from March 1, 2018 to April 7, 2023, at a single academic medical center. Exclusion criteria were: patients aged <18 years of age and of vulnerable populations (e.g., prisoners, pregnant women), studies with missing data (e.g., medical record numbers), and studies which were not submitted for quality assurance. All flight physicians were trained in prehospital POCUS and required to complete a standardized worksheet following the completion of each examination. Images and worksheets were reviewed weekly and assigned a score for interpretation (e.g., true positive) and whether the exam was acceptable for quality (e.g., yes/no). A second blinded reviewer interpreted all studies. An agreement analysis (Cohen's kappa) was calculated for each variable. McNemar testing was used to assess differences in the distribution of binary measures. Demographic information was obtained for each study participant.
Results
In total, 242 patients received POCUS for a total of 364 examinations by 26 unique users. Focused cardiac (40.4%) and thoracic (32.4%) exams were most commonly performed. Overall accuracy and acceptability for all exams performed were 97.6% and 96.1%, respectively. The accuracy of interpretation between raters demonstrated high agreement (89.2%; K=0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88). Acceptability of image quality was also high between raters (95.0%; K=0.38, 95% CI 0.10-0.65) without significant disagreement (p=0.25). Users self-reported alterations in patient management in 75.6% of cases (n=183), most commonly by improving diagnostic certainty (n=131, 71.6%) and altering medical management (n=62, 33.9%).
Conclusion
Focused cardiac and thoracic examinations were the most commonly performed POCUS examinations. Prehospital POCUS can be performed accurately by flight physicians with acceptable image quality. Users frequently reported improved diagnostic accuracy when utilizing prehospital POCUS.
{"title":"Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Program","authors":"Mason A. Hill BS, Jarett D. Jones BS, Matthew VandeHei MD, Justin Purnell MD, Nikolai Schnittke MD, PhD, Sara Damewood MD, Hani I. Kuttab MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the prehospital setting has rapidly expanded, including helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). A more robust understanding of the use of prehospital POCUS and its impact on patient management is needed. The purpose of this study is to: 1) evaluate the applications of prehospital POCUS examinations, 2) assess physician accuracy in interpretation and the acceptability of the quality of performed exams, and 3) evaluate self-reported alterations in patient management.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients aged >18 years transported via HEMS from March 1, 2018 to April 7, 2023, at a single academic medical center. Exclusion criteria were: patients aged <18 years of age and of vulnerable populations (e.g., prisoners, pregnant women), studies with missing data (e.g., medical record numbers), and studies which were not submitted for quality assurance. All flight physicians were trained in prehospital POCUS and required to complete a standardized worksheet following the completion of each examination. Images and worksheets were reviewed weekly and assigned a score for interpretation (e.g., true positive) and whether the exam was acceptable for quality (e.g., yes/no). A second blinded reviewer interpreted all studies. An agreement analysis (Cohen's kappa) was calculated for each variable. McNemar testing was used to assess differences in the distribution of binary measures. Demographic information was obtained for each study participant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 242 patients received POCUS for a total of 364 examinations by 26 unique users. Focused cardiac (40.4%) and thoracic (32.4%) exams were most commonly performed. Overall accuracy and acceptability for all exams performed were 97.6% and 96.1%, respectively. The accuracy of interpretation between raters demonstrated high agreement (89.2%; K=0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88). Acceptability of image quality was also high between raters (95.0%; K=0.38, 95% CI 0.10-0.65) without significant disagreement (p=0.25). Users self-reported alterations in patient management in 75.6% of cases (n=183), most commonly by improving diagnostic certainty (n=131, 71.6%) and altering medical management (n=62, 33.9%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Focused cardiac and thoracic examinations were the most commonly performed POCUS examinations. Prehospital POCUS can be performed accurately by flight physicians with acceptable image quality. Users frequently reported improved diagnostic accuracy when utilizing prehospital POCUS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Page 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141423897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.014
Craig Tschautscher MD, MS, Cassandra Hardy MD, Mitchell Butterbaugh MD, Matthew Stampfl MD, Scott Hetzel MS, Brittney Bernardoni MD, Michael Spigner MD, Ryan Newberry DO, Andrew Cathers MD
Objective
Hypocalcemia in critically ill patients has been previously shown to lead to higher transfusion needs and increased mortality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if empiric prehospital calcium administration with concomitant blood product delivery in patients with hemorrhagic shock, improved initial in hospital ionized calcium, reduced coagulopathy, reduced blood product administration and improved 24 hour survival.
Methods
Our study was a convenience sample, retrospective chart review over a six year period analyzing clinical outcomes of patients pre and post protocol initiation, of empiric calcium administration with concomitant administration of blood products during aeromedical transport in a hospital based critical care transport program. T-test, Wilcoxon ranks sum test, and Chi-square tests were used for demographic and presentation differences between the two groups to demonstrate exchangeability between the control (baseline) and treatment (post-protocol change) groups. The primary outcome was initial ionized calcium levels on presentation to the receiving facility, and secondary outcomes of interest were coagulopathy, based on platelet count and INR, total blood product administration, and survival at 24 hours.
Results
131 patients were in the pre-implementation phase and 116 were in the post-protocol change phase. There was no significant difference in age (57.6 vs 55.0 years), sex male (62.6% vs 69.8%), initial vitals, shock index (1.0 vs 1.0) or injury severity score (33.0 vs 30.5). There was a statistically significant improvement in initial ionized calcium levels 4.2(0.6) in the control and 4.5(0.8) in the treatment group, (p=0.026). Initial INR was similar between the two groups (1.4 vs 1.5) (p=0.655), and there was no significant change in platelet count (183.0 vs 198.2 per microliter) (p=0.285). There was no change in survival rates between the control (112, 86.8%) and the treatment groups (99, 86.1%), (p=>0.999). Additionally, there was no change in the amount of blood products administered in the first 24 hours of hospital stay between the two groups, control group received a total of 75 units of blood products and treatment group received 74 units (p=0.389). Of interest there was a significant increase in the amount of pressors given in the post group 27 patients in the control group and 39 patients in the treatment group requiring pressors in the first 24 hours of hospitalization (p 0.033). Not surprisingly there was a significant increase in the amount of TXA (27.6% vs 43.5%) (p=0.016), and calcium given (2.3% vs 19.1%) (p=<.001) in the treatment group, during their prehospital care.
Conclusion
Overall, there was a statistically significant improvement in ionized calcium. However there was no significant difference in coagulopathy, based on INR and platelet count, nor a significant improvement in survival at 24 h
{"title":"Outcomes of Empiric Calcium Administration with Prehospital Blood Product Administration","authors":"Craig Tschautscher MD, MS, Cassandra Hardy MD, Mitchell Butterbaugh MD, Matthew Stampfl MD, Scott Hetzel MS, Brittney Bernardoni MD, Michael Spigner MD, Ryan Newberry DO, Andrew Cathers MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Hypocalcemia in critically ill patients has been previously shown to lead to higher transfusion needs and increased mortality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if empiric prehospital calcium administration with concomitant blood product delivery in patients with hemorrhagic shock, improved initial in hospital ionized calcium, reduced coagulopathy, reduced blood product administration and improved 24 hour survival.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our study was a convenience sample, retrospective chart review over a six year period analyzing clinical outcomes of patients pre and post protocol initiation, of empiric calcium administration with concomitant administration of blood products during aeromedical transport in a hospital based critical care transport program. T-test, Wilcoxon ranks sum test, and Chi-square tests were used for demographic and presentation differences between the two groups to demonstrate exchangeability between the control (baseline) and treatment (post-protocol change) groups. The primary outcome was initial ionized calcium levels on presentation to the receiving facility, and secondary outcomes of interest were coagulopathy, based on platelet count and INR, total blood product administration, and survival at 24 hours.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>131 patients were in the pre-implementation phase and 116 were in the post-protocol change phase. There was no significant difference in age (57.6 vs 55.0 years), sex male (62.6% vs 69.8%), initial vitals, shock index (1.0 vs 1.0) or injury severity score (33.0 vs 30.5). There was a statistically significant improvement in initial ionized calcium levels 4.2(0.6) in the control and 4.5(0.8) in the treatment group, (p=0.026). Initial INR was similar between the two groups (1.4 vs 1.5) (p=0.655), and there was no significant change in platelet count (183.0 vs 198.2 per microliter) (p=0.285). There was no change in survival rates between the control (112, 86.8%) and the treatment groups (99, 86.1%), (p=>0.999). Additionally, there was no change in the amount of blood products administered in the first 24 hours of hospital stay between the two groups, control group received a total of 75 units of blood products and treatment group received 74 units (p=0.389). Of interest there was a significant increase in the amount of pressors given in the post group 27 patients in the control group and 39 patients in the treatment group requiring pressors in the first 24 hours of hospitalization (p 0.033). Not surprisingly there was a significant increase in the amount of TXA (27.6% vs 43.5%) (p=0.016), and calcium given (2.3% vs 19.1%) (p=<.001) in the treatment group, during their prehospital care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overall, there was a statistically significant improvement in ionized calcium. However there was no significant difference in coagulopathy, based on INR and platelet count, nor a significant improvement in survival at 24 h","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Page 364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141423895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.015
Jarett D. Jones BS, Mason A. Hill BS, Matthew VandeHei MD, Justin Purnell MD, Nikolai Schnittke MD, PhD, Sara Damewood MD, Hani I. Kuttab MD
Objective
Time constraints and concerns for delays in transport are often cited by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) providers as factors for not performing point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of POCUS on clinical bedside times in HEMS transports.
Methods
This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients aged >18 years transported via HEMS from March 1, 2018 to April 7, 2023, at a single academic medical center who received a POCUS examination. Exclusion criteria were: patients aged <18 years of age and of vulnerable populations (e.g., prisoners, pregnant women), studies with missing data (e.g., medical record numbers), and studies which were not submitted for quality assurance. The POCUS group was matched to a cohort of patients transported in 2022 who did not receive POCUS. A linear regression model was fit to evaluate the effect of POCUS on clinical bedside time, adjusting for confounders. Covariates adjusted for included: age, sex, type of transfer (interfacility vs. scene), type of call (medical vs. scene), air vs. ground transport, red blood cell, vasopressor, or IV fluids administration, intubation, disposition, and specialty call (e.g., ECMO). Since the data for the control group was only for a single year, a second model was fit matching the same time-period for both groups. A sensitivity analysis was performed for each model.
Results
In total, 439 patients were included; 242 patients (55.1%) received POCUS and 197 patients (44.9%) had no POCUS performed. Overall mean clinical bedside time was 48 ± 33 minutes in the POCUS group versus 32 ± 23 minutes in the non-POCUS group. POCUS cases were more likely to be scene calls (39% vs. 14%), trauma cases (42% vs. 26%), were more likely to receive red blood cells (20% vs. 7.6%), vasopressors (44% vs. 16%), or more likely intubated in the field (48% vs. 28%). When evaluating the entire cohort, patients exposed to POCUS experienced times 21% longer than those in the non-POCUS group (β = 0.19, 95% CI 0.09-0.29, p <0.001; R² = 56.6%). However, when considering only the period-matched cohort (2022, n=290), no significant difference in clinical beside times was observed in the POCUS group (β = 0.09, 95% CI -0.05-0.23, p = 0.23; R² = 56.0%). In this model, a nonsignificant increase in time was estimated to be two minutes, with the upper limit of confidence at five minutes.
Conclusions
In the entire cohort, patients with HEMS-performed POCUS exam had significantly longer bedside times. However, these patients were also more likely to be scene calls, trauma cases, and more critically ill compared to non-POCUS cases. When evaluating a period-matched cohort of patients in 2022, no significant differences in cases where POCUS was utilized was observed. This may be due to improved provider comfort and efficiency p
{"title":"Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services and Impact on Clinical Bedside Times","authors":"Jarett D. Jones BS, Mason A. Hill BS, Matthew VandeHei MD, Justin Purnell MD, Nikolai Schnittke MD, PhD, Sara Damewood MD, Hani I. Kuttab MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Time constraints and concerns for delays in transport are often cited by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) providers as factors for not performing point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of POCUS on clinical bedside times in HEMS transports.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients aged >18 years transported via HEMS from March 1, 2018 to April 7, 2023, at a single academic medical center who received a POCUS examination. Exclusion criteria were: patients aged <18 years of age and of vulnerable populations (e.g., prisoners, pregnant women), studies with missing data (e.g., medical record numbers), and studies which were not submitted for quality assurance. The POCUS group was matched to a cohort of patients transported in 2022 who did not receive POCUS. A linear regression model was fit to evaluate the effect of POCUS on clinical bedside time, adjusting for confounders. Covariates adjusted for included: age, sex, type of transfer (interfacility vs. scene), type of call (medical vs. scene), air vs. ground transport, red blood cell, vasopressor, or IV fluids administration, intubation, disposition, and specialty call (e.g., ECMO). Since the data for the control group was only for a single year, a second model was fit matching the same time-period for both groups. A sensitivity analysis was performed for each model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 439 patients were included; 242 patients (55.1%) received POCUS and 197 patients (44.9%) had no POCUS performed. Overall mean clinical bedside time was 48 ± 33 minutes in the POCUS group versus 32 ± 23 minutes in the non-POCUS group. POCUS cases were more likely to be scene calls (39% vs. 14%), trauma cases (42% vs. 26%), were more likely to receive red blood cells (20% vs. 7.6%), vasopressors (44% vs. 16%), or more likely intubated in the field (48% vs. 28%). When evaluating the entire cohort, patients exposed to POCUS experienced times 21% longer than those in the non-POCUS group (β = 0.19, 95% CI 0.09-0.29, p <0.001; R² = 56.6%). However, when considering only the period-matched cohort (2022, n=290), no significant difference in clinical beside times was observed in the POCUS group (β = 0.09, 95% CI -0.05-0.23, p = 0.23; R² = 56.0%). In this model, a nonsignificant increase in time was estimated to be two minutes, with the upper limit of confidence at five minutes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the entire cohort, patients with HEMS-performed POCUS exam had significantly longer bedside times. However, these patients were also more likely to be scene calls, trauma cases, and more critically ill compared to non-POCUS cases. When evaluating a period-matched cohort of patients in 2022, no significant differences in cases where POCUS was utilized was observed. This may be due to improved provider comfort and efficiency p","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Pages 364-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141423896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.012
Charlotte Bisaccia EMT - IV
Past research has shown that EMS professionals are affected by many mental health issues such as PTSD, depression, anxiety, substance abuse, sleep disturbances, burnout, and even suicidal ideation. The research discussed herein assesses the levels of disordered eating and body image in EMTs/paramedics as compared to emergency department nurses using a disordered eating scale, an eating disorder scale, and a body image scale. Results showed that EMS workers had significantly lower body image satisfaction scores compared to ED nurses, and that those participants in 911/On Campus services showed lower body image scores than those in Interfacility Transport/Emergency Departments. Results trended towards showing that those with fewer lunches out of the past ten shifts had higher disordered eating. Additionally, fewer than half of participants felt that they could take regularly scheduled breaks for eating and 84.2% of participants answered “yes” or “sometimes” to the common phenomenon of “eating when and where you can” while on a shift. These results exhibit concerning issues of decreased body image across EMS professionals and deep-rooted problems with nourishment while on shift. These issues must be addressed as it is a matter of public safety to attend to the mental health of first responders so that they can attend to the critical requirements of their job.
{"title":"Disordered Eating & Body Image in Emergency Medical Services Staff","authors":"Charlotte Bisaccia EMT - IV","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Past research has shown that EMS professionals are affected by many mental health issues such as PTSD, depression, anxiety, substance abuse, sleep disturbances, burnout, and even suicidal ideation. The research discussed herein assesses the levels of disordered eating and body image in EMTs/paramedics as compared to emergency department nurses using a disordered eating scale, an eating disorder scale, and a body image scale. Results showed that EMS workers had significantly lower body image satisfaction scores compared to ED nurses, and that those participants in 911/On Campus services showed lower body image scores than those in Interfacility Transport/Emergency Departments. Results trended towards showing that those with fewer lunches out of the past ten shifts had higher disordered eating. Additionally, fewer than half of participants felt that they could take regularly scheduled breaks for eating and 84.2% of participants answered “yes” or “sometimes” to the common phenomenon of “eating when and where you can” while on a shift. These results exhibit concerning issues of decreased body image across EMS professionals and deep-rooted problems with nourishment while on shift. These issues must be addressed as it is a matter of public safety to attend to the mental health of first responders so that they can attend to the critical requirements of their job.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Page 363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.018
Jason W. Herman DNP, Michelle Cox-Henley DNP, Holly Brown DNP, Kenyatta Brown DNP, Thomas Joshua PhD, Chelsea Lemons
Objective
The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine what effect holding clinical debriefing following traumatic patient encounters has on employee intent to leave and job satisfaction.
Methods
This observational quality improvement project was undertaken at Augusta University AirCare a helicopter emergency medicine service, in a large, metropolitan city located in the southeast from September 12th, 2023, to October 12th, 2023. The mean of each survey section was utilized to compare the pre-and post-survey scores to determine the effect of a structured clinical debrief on employee intent to leave, burnout, and job satisfaction.
Results
A total of 6 flight clinicians completed the pre-test survey and 5 flight clinicians completed the post-test. Although results were not statistically significant, post-intervention scores reflected a decrease in the mean value after implementation of the STOP5 debrief model for both burnout (pre-intervention mean= 62, post intervention mean=56) and intent to leave (pre-intervention mean=17, post intervention mean= 9). However, job satisfaction mean value did not increase as expected (pre-intervention mean= 12, post-intervention mean=14), which may be due to the short implementation period between measurements.
Conclusion
This Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) quality improvement project determined that holding clinical debriefs following traumatic patient encounters may decrease employee intent to leave and burnout but did not show improvement in employee job satisfaction.
{"title":"Clinical Debriefing Impact Related to Intent to Leave and Job Satisfaction","authors":"Jason W. Herman DNP, Michelle Cox-Henley DNP, Holly Brown DNP, Kenyatta Brown DNP, Thomas Joshua PhD, Chelsea Lemons","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine what effect holding clinical debriefing following traumatic patient encounters has on employee intent to leave and job satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational quality improvement project was undertaken at Augusta University AirCare a helicopter emergency medicine service, in a large, metropolitan city located in the southeast from September 12th, 2023, to October 12th, 2023. The mean of each survey section was utilized to compare the pre-and post-survey scores to determine the effect of a structured clinical debrief on employee intent to leave, burnout, and job satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 6 flight clinicians completed the pre-test survey and 5 flight clinicians completed the post-test. Although results were not statistically significant, post-intervention scores reflected a decrease in the mean value after implementation of the STOP5 debrief model for both burnout (pre-intervention mean= 62, post intervention mean=56) and intent to leave (pre-intervention mean=17, post intervention mean= 9). However, job satisfaction mean value did not increase as expected (pre-intervention mean= 12, post-intervention mean=14), which may be due to the short implementation period between measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) quality improvement project determined that holding clinical debriefs following traumatic patient encounters may decrease employee intent to leave and burnout but did not show improvement in employee job satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Pages 365-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.021
Alissa M. Bates MD, Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP, Kalle J. Fjeld MD, Jeremy M. Singleton RN, CFRN, Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH
Introduction
Push dose vasopressors are administered to attenuate peri-intubation hypotension in critically ill patients. The benefit of push dose vasopressors over initiation of continuous vasopressor infusions is unclear. The aim of this study was to describe current use of push dose vasopressors in critical care transport.
Methods
This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years) intubated between January 2017 and May 2023 by a single critical care transport service who received peri-intubation push dose vasopressors. The primary outcome was incidence of push dose vasopressor administration. The secondary outcome was frequency of initiation or increase in continuous vasopressor infusion after intubation.
Results
Three hundred thirty-four patients were intubated during this period, 49 (14.7%) received push dose vasopressors in the peri-intubation period. The mean age was 55.8 ± 19.7 years and 28 (57.1%) were male. Forty-five (91.8%) were transported via rotor wing aircraft. Twenty-three (46.9%) were scene transports. The most common indication for intubation was trauma (n=30, 61.2%). The mean pre-intubation shock index was 1.1 ± 0.5. Of those who received push dose vasopressors, 34 (69.4%) received multiple push doses; the mean number of administrations was 2.5 ± 1.9. Forty-eight (97.9%) received push dose vasopressors prior to intubation and 36 (73.4%) received push doses post intubation. Fifteen (30.6%) were started on a continuous vasopressor infusion and 3 (11.1%) had an increase in an existing infusion post-intubation.
Conclusion
Push dose vasopressors were utilized in a heterogeneous manner in the peri-intubation period. It remains unclear which patients may benefit from initiation of continuous vasopressor infusion rather than push dose vasopressors. Further investigation is required to better elucidate the role of push dose and continuous vasopressors in the peri-intubation period.
{"title":"Peri-Intubation Push Dose Vasopressors in Critical Care Transport","authors":"Alissa M. Bates MD, Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP, Kalle J. Fjeld MD, Jeremy M. Singleton RN, CFRN, Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Push dose vasopressors are administered to attenuate peri-intubation hypotension in critically ill patients. The benefit of push dose vasopressors over initiation of continuous vasopressor infusions is unclear. The aim of this study was to describe current use of push dose vasopressors in critical care transport.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years) intubated between January 2017 and May 2023 by a single critical care transport service who received peri-intubation push dose vasopressors. The primary outcome was incidence of push dose vasopressor administration. The secondary outcome was frequency of initiation or increase in continuous vasopressor infusion after intubation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three hundred thirty-four patients were intubated during this period, 49 (14.7%) received push dose vasopressors in the peri-intubation period. The mean age was 55.8 ± 19.7 years and 28 (57.1%) were male. Forty-five (91.8%) were transported via rotor wing aircraft. Twenty-three (46.9%) were scene transports. The most common indication for intubation was trauma (n=30, 61.2%). The mean pre-intubation shock index was 1.1 ± 0.5. Of those who received push dose vasopressors, 34 (69.4%) received multiple push doses; the mean number of administrations was 2.5 ± 1.9. Forty-eight (97.9%) received push dose vasopressors prior to intubation and 36 (73.4%) received push doses post intubation. Fifteen (30.6%) were started on a continuous vasopressor infusion and 3 (11.1%) had an increase in an existing infusion post-intubation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Push dose vasopressors were utilized in a heterogeneous manner in the peri-intubation period. It remains unclear which patients may benefit from initiation of continuous vasopressor infusion rather than push dose vasopressors. Further investigation is required to better elucidate the role of push dose and continuous vasopressors in the peri-intubation period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Page 367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.011
Lauren Gillespie, Adam Gottula, Brittney Bernardoni, Andrew Cathers, Kolby Kolbet, Marcus Rudolph, Alberto Lucchini, Per Bredmose, Michael Frakes, Kyle Danielson, Melissa Ann Vogelsong, Dinis Reis Miranda, Michael Lauria, Guglielmo Imbriaco, William R. Hinckley, Brian Burns, Christine Brent, Bennett Lane
Objectives
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of complete cardiopulmonary support that has been associated with improved survival in severe acute respiratory failure and refractory cardiac arrest. Current data provided by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization demonstrate that the use of ECMO is increasing. However, ECMO remains a highly specialized and resource-intensive intervention with improved outcomes associated with higher ECMO center volumes, supporting the creation of regionalized care models. As such, the role of critical care transport is vital. Presently, there is little known about methods, crew configurations, protocols, and training for ECMO-capable transport teams. We aimed to descriptively analyze established ECMO transport programs across multiple countries.
Methods
A standardized, 27-item survey was distributed to 16 transport organizations across nine different countries. The survey included items such as transport team composition, training requirements, transport method, and various technical aspects. If available, transport organizations provided ECMO transport protocols and transport configuration schematics.
Results
To date, twelve ECMO programs responded from five countries (75% response rate). Most programs (83%) offer ground, 67% offer rotor-wing, and 50% offer fixed wing transport. A minority of programs (25%) were capable of any method of transport. Nearly half (42%) of programs did not require a separate ECMO team. A physician was present always or variably during ECMO transports in 67% of programs, and 92% of transport teams had a perfusionist or ECMO specialist and a nurse. All twelve programs required initial team ECMO training, and most programs also provided continuing education on an annual basis. Of the nine transport teams capable of performing ECMO cannulation, four programs (44%) could cannulate in any prehospital or in-hospital location.
Conclusions
Critical care transport teams play an essential role in increasing access to ECMO for patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure. There is significant variability in team composition and specialization as well as transport modality, but training requirements are commonly seen across programs. Further study is needed to define the optimal components for safe interfacility transport of ECMO patients.
{"title":"Transport of Patients Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An International Qualitative Analysis","authors":"Lauren Gillespie, Adam Gottula, Brittney Bernardoni, Andrew Cathers, Kolby Kolbet, Marcus Rudolph, Alberto Lucchini, Per Bredmose, Michael Frakes, Kyle Danielson, Melissa Ann Vogelsong, Dinis Reis Miranda, Michael Lauria, Guglielmo Imbriaco, William R. Hinckley, Brian Burns, Christine Brent, Bennett Lane","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of complete cardiopulmonary support that has been associated with improved survival in severe acute respiratory failure and refractory cardiac arrest. Current data provided by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization demonstrate that the use of ECMO is increasing. However, ECMO remains a highly specialized and resource-intensive intervention with improved outcomes associated with higher ECMO center volumes, supporting the creation of regionalized care models. As such, the role of critical care transport is vital. Presently, there is little known about methods, crew configurations, protocols, and training for ECMO-capable transport teams. We aimed to descriptively analyze established ECMO transport programs across multiple countries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A standardized, 27-item survey was distributed to 16 transport organizations across nine different countries. The survey included items such as transport team composition, training requirements, transport method, and various technical aspects. If available, transport organizations provided ECMO transport protocols and transport configuration schematics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>To date, twelve ECMO programs responded from five countries (75% response rate). Most programs (83%) offer ground, 67% offer rotor-wing, and 50% offer fixed wing transport. A minority of programs (25%) were capable of any method of transport. Nearly half (42%) of programs did not require a separate ECMO team. A physician was present always or variably during ECMO transports in 67% of programs, and 92% of transport teams had a perfusionist or ECMO specialist and a nurse. All twelve programs required initial team ECMO training, and most programs also provided continuing education on an annual basis. Of the nine transport teams capable of performing ECMO cannulation, four programs (44%) could cannulate in any prehospital or in-hospital location.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Critical care transport teams play an essential role in increasing access to ECMO for patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure. There is significant variability in team composition and specialization as well as transport modality, but training requirements are commonly seen across programs. Further study is needed to define the optimal components for safe interfacility transport of ECMO patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Page 363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.013
Chase J. Canter BS, FP-C, Scott M. Newton DNP, RN, MHA, Mackenzie M. McGahan DO
Background
Distributed mobile care teams such as emergency medical services and critical care transport teams face constraints of time, funding, staffing and access to high-fidelity training environments. Introducing skills into resource limited settings using innovative low-fidelity methods expand opportunities for development.
Objective
We aim to test the feasibility of low-fidelity point of care ultrasound (POCUS) simulation training for assisted peripheral intravenous (PIV) placement to develop baseline competence and confidence in critical care transport team clinicians.
Methods
A low-fidelity simulation model was developed using off the shelf items including canned-meat (i.e. Spam), modeling balloons, and dyed water to provide a similar image as a POCUS-PIV high-fidelity mannequin and human training subject. A convenience sample of seven staff were recruited to undergo didactic and hands-on training using the low-fidelity model. Training was led by an emergency ultrasound fellow in our affiliated hospital system. A non-compulsory post-training survey using structured questions and Likert-scale was electronically distributed to the training participants, with one hundred percent of the surveys returned.
Results
Use of a low-fidelity simulation model required no formal meetings or utilization of an off-site simulation center, reducing administrative burden. Low cost of simulation model supplies allowed for multiple simulators to be available, enabling concurrent use among participants which decreased total time spent in the training session. Post-training survey data indicated the following results: overall participants found that low-fidelity training developed their initial clinical decision making for completing this intervention in clinical practice. Eighty-six percent report increased confidence in placing ultrasound guided PIV after the lab. Seventy-one percent of participants identified as entry-level handheld ultrasound users. Most providers report receiving proper knowledge and skillset with the use of this low-fidelity task trainer and that the training successfully allowed them to perform the simulated intervention. One learner does remark subjectively that they did not receive proper knowledge and skillset in this lab.
Conclusions
A low-fidelity simulation model using off-the-shelf items allowed for successful psychomotor training for ultrasound assisted peripheral IV insertion. The low-cost simulation model allowed for multiple models to be present during training, enabling multiple repetitions to be completed when compared to having one, high-fidelity simulator. Practicing this intervention in a safe learning environment, without outside spectators, was found to promote confidence and increase self-reported likelihood of completing the intervention in clinical practice. Use of low-fidelity simulation models appears
{"title":"Feasibility of Low-Fidelity Simulation for POCUS Assisted Vascular Access in the Critical Care Transport Environment","authors":"Chase J. Canter BS, FP-C, Scott M. Newton DNP, RN, MHA, Mackenzie M. McGahan DO","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Distributed mobile care teams such as emergency medical services and critical care transport teams face constraints of time, funding, staffing and access to high-fidelity training environments. Introducing skills into resource limited settings using innovative low-fidelity methods expand opportunities for development.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aim to test the feasibility of low-fidelity point of care ultrasound (POCUS) simulation training for assisted peripheral intravenous (PIV) placement to develop baseline competence and confidence in critical care transport team clinicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A low-fidelity simulation model was developed using off the shelf items including canned-meat (i.e. Spam), modeling balloons, and dyed water to provide a similar image as a POCUS-PIV high-fidelity mannequin and human training subject. A convenience sample of seven staff were recruited to undergo didactic and hands-on training using the low-fidelity model. Training was led by an emergency ultrasound fellow in our affiliated hospital system. A non-compulsory post-training survey using structured questions and Likert-scale was electronically distributed to the training participants, with one hundred percent of the surveys returned.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Use of a low-fidelity simulation model required no formal meetings or utilization of an off-site simulation center, reducing administrative burden. Low cost of simulation model supplies allowed for multiple simulators to be available, enabling concurrent use among participants which decreased total time spent in the training session. Post-training survey data indicated the following results: overall participants found that low-fidelity training developed their initial clinical decision making for completing this intervention in clinical practice. Eighty-six percent report increased confidence in placing ultrasound guided PIV after the lab. Seventy-one percent of participants identified as entry-level handheld ultrasound users. Most providers report receiving proper knowledge and skillset with the use of this low-fidelity task trainer and that the training successfully allowed them to perform the simulated intervention. One learner does remark subjectively that they did not receive proper knowledge and skillset in this lab.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A low-fidelity simulation model using off-the-shelf items allowed for successful psychomotor training for ultrasound assisted peripheral IV insertion. The low-cost simulation model allowed for multiple models to be present during training, enabling multiple repetitions to be completed when compared to having one, high-fidelity simulator. Practicing this intervention in a safe learning environment, without outside spectators, was found to promote confidence and increase self-reported likelihood of completing the intervention in clinical practice. Use of low-fidelity simulation models appears","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Pages 363-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141423894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has significantly increased trauma related civilian injuries and deaths at the front lines and throughout Ukraine. Early assessments identified an immediate need for trauma education and training among first responders due to the rapidly rising trauma volume and strained prehospital resources. In response, an academic-non-governmental organization was formed to develop, and deliver, a live in-person prehospital training course throughout Ukraine.
Objective
To determine the impact of targeted needs-based training on first responder preparedness, knowledge, and confidence to manage trauma patients.
Methods
A new 16-hour course containing lectures, skills stations, case studies, and simulation called Prehospital Trauma Fundamentals (PHTF) was developed using needs assessments and international training standards. Course materials were translated into Ukrainian, and courses were taught with live bidirectional interpretation as required. 10 courses were taught from August-November 2022 by both non-Ukrainian and Ukrainian instructors. Pre- and post- knowledge and self-confidence assessments measured course effectiveness. Six-to-eight-week follow-up surveys were also distributed. Data were analyzed using McNemar's test for paired data and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. This project was determined to not require Institutional Review Board approval by the Mass General Brigham Office of Human Research Affairs.
Results
268 first responders were trained in Kyiv, Dnipro, Odessa, and Zaporizhzhia. Participants were predominantly female (65%), median age was 35yrs. Of 193 matched re-to post-course knowledge assessments, scores increased from 53.4%[SD15.4%] to 74.4%[SD15.6%](p<0.001). Assessment scores increased for most participants (93.3%). Self-confidence surveys demonstrated improved comfort handling trauma patients (71.7%v83.3%;p<0.001), preparedness to manage life-threatening conditions (46.1%v66.1%;p<0.0001), and belief in an organized approach to trauma care (59.2%v90.5%;p<00001). Nervousness decreased (63.1%v52.5%;p<0.05) and sense of skill deficit decreased (79.0%v33.7%;p<0.0001). 59 (22.0%) participants completed the follow-up survey; 100% stated the training has or will have a life-saving effect in their patient management. Most (62.7%) had already applied course skills and taught (64.4%) others course skills or information.
Conclusion
PHTF increased participant knowledge, preparedness, and confidence to care for trauma patients. Participants successfully applied information taught during the ongoing conflict, which suggests value in delivering targeted educational programs just before or during large-scale events. This course and lessons learned from its development and delivery can serve as a starting point for delivering first responder trauma education in other
{"title":"The Impact of Prehospital Trauma Education in a Conflict Zone","authors":"Kevin Collopy MHL, FP-C, CMTE, Ame Lozano BS, NR-P, Javed Ali MPH, Katie Biniki BSN, Honcharova Goncharova MD, Brock Jenkins BS, NRP, FP-C, CCP-C, Jill John-Kall MD, MSc, Oleksii Lopatniuk, Gideon Loevinsohn MD, PhD, Myroslav Mardarevych PhD, Nelya Melnitchouk MD, Katie Murray LLM, Dmytro Pedan, John Roberts MD, Meaghan Sydlowski, Jonathan Strong MD, MPH, Alexis Schmid DNP, RN, CPNP, MPH, Sean Kivlehan MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has significantly increased trauma related civilian injuries and deaths at the front lines and throughout Ukraine. Early assessments identified an immediate need for trauma education and training among first responders due to the rapidly rising trauma volume and strained prehospital resources. In response, an academic-non-governmental organization was formed to develop, and deliver, a live in-person prehospital training course throughout Ukraine.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the impact of targeted needs-based training on first responder preparedness, knowledge, and confidence to manage trauma patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A new 16-hour course containing lectures, skills stations, case studies, and simulation called Prehospital Trauma Fundamentals (PHTF) was developed using needs assessments and international training standards. Course materials were translated into Ukrainian, and courses were taught with live bidirectional interpretation as required. 10 courses were taught from August-November 2022 by both non-Ukrainian and Ukrainian instructors. Pre- and post- knowledge and self-confidence assessments measured course effectiveness. Six-to-eight-week follow-up surveys were also distributed. Data were analyzed using McNemar's test for paired data and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. This project was determined to not require Institutional Review Board approval by the Mass General Brigham Office of Human Research Affairs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>268 first responders were trained in Kyiv, Dnipro, Odessa, and Zaporizhzhia. Participants were predominantly female (65%), median age was 35yrs. Of 193 matched re-to post-course knowledge assessments, scores increased from 53.4%[SD15.4%] to 74.4%[SD15.6%](p<0.001). Assessment scores increased for most participants (93.3%). Self-confidence surveys demonstrated improved comfort handling trauma patients (71.7%v83.3%;p<0.001), preparedness to manage life-threatening conditions (46.1%v66.1%;p<0.0001), and belief in an organized approach to trauma care (59.2%v90.5%;p<00001). Nervousness decreased (63.1%v52.5%;p<0.05) and sense of skill deficit decreased (79.0%v33.7%;p<0.0001). 59 (22.0%) participants completed the follow-up survey; 100% stated the training has or will have a life-saving effect in their patient management. Most (62.7%) had already applied course skills and taught (64.4%) others course skills or information.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PHTF increased participant knowledge, preparedness, and confidence to care for trauma patients. Participants successfully applied information taught during the ongoing conflict, which suggests value in delivering targeted educational programs just before or during large-scale events. This course and lessons learned from its development and delivery can serve as a starting point for delivering first responder trauma education in other ","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Pages 366-367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141423931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.024
Tanner Smida, Remle P. Crowe, Patrick W. Merrill, James F. Scheidler
Objective
The i-gel supraglottic airway device is commonly used in the United States and worldwide for prehospital airway management. Previous research has suggested that a sex-based method of size selection (4.0 for female patients, 5.0 for male patients) is superior to a weight-based method in patients undergoing elective anesthesia. Our objective was to compare a sex-based i-gel size selection strategy to a weight-based strategy using real-world prehospital data.
Methods
The ESO Data Collaborative 2018-2022 dataset was used. All initial i-gel insertion attempts in patients > 18 years of age were evaluated for inclusion. Insertion attempts were excluded if age, sex, weight, success, or device size was not documented. Airway attempts were classified as being consistent with a weight-based sizing method if the i-gel size was 3.0 and the patient was less than 50 kg, the i-gel size was 4.0 and the patient was 50-90 kg, or the i-gel size was 5.0 and the patient was greater than 90 kg. Airway attempts were classified as being consistent with a sex-based sizing method if the i-gel was a 4.0 and the patient was a female or if the i-gel was a 5.0 and the patient was a male. Logistic regression was used to compare the rate of insertion failure on the first attempt for the group placed in alignment with the weight-based but not sex-based method to the group placed in alignment with the sex-based but not weight-based method.
Results
After application of exclusion criteria, 39,867 initial i-gel insertion attempts were included. The overall rate of failure was 6.5% (2,585/39,867). Among the total number of insertion attempts, 9,637 (24.2%) were consistent with both the weight-based and sex-based sizing method, 10,738 (26.9%) were consistent with the weight- but not sex-based sizing method, 5,527 (13.9%) were consistent with the sex- but not weight-based method, and 13,965 (35.0%) were consistent with neither method. The rate of unsuccessful i-gel placement was similar when i-gel devices were placed in alignment with a sex-based size selection method in comparison to i-gel placement in alignment with a weight-based selection strategy (6.0 vs. 6.4%). Logistic regression analysis did not reveal a significant difference between groups (OR: 1.08 [0.95, 1.23]).
Conclusion
The use of a sex-based method of i-gel size selection may be equivalent with respect to the rate of unsuccessful i-gel placement on the first attempt in comparison to a weight-based method.
{"title":"A Simpler Method for Choosing Adult i-gel Size: An Evaluation of Real-World Prehospital Data","authors":"Tanner Smida, Remle P. Crowe, Patrick W. Merrill, James F. Scheidler","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.024","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The i-gel supraglottic airway device is commonly used in the United States and worldwide for prehospital airway management. Previous research has suggested that a sex-based method of size selection (4.0 for female patients, 5.0 for male patients) is superior to a weight-based method in patients undergoing elective anesthesia. Our objective was to compare a sex-based i-gel size selection strategy to a weight-based strategy using real-world prehospital data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The ESO Data Collaborative 2018-2022 dataset was used. All initial i-gel insertion attempts in patients > 18 years of age were evaluated for inclusion. Insertion attempts were excluded if age, sex, weight, success, or device size was not documented. Airway attempts were classified as being consistent with a weight-based sizing method if the i-gel size was 3.0 and the patient was less than 50 kg, the i-gel size was 4.0 and the patient was 50-90 kg, or the i-gel size was 5.0 and the patient was greater than 90 kg. Airway attempts were classified as being consistent with a sex-based sizing method if the i-gel was a 4.0 and the patient was a female or if the i-gel was a 5.0 and the patient was a male. Logistic regression was used to compare the rate of insertion failure on the first attempt for the group placed in alignment with the weight-based but not sex-based method to the group placed in alignment with the sex-based but not weight-based method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After application of exclusion criteria, 39,867 initial i-gel insertion attempts were included. The overall rate of failure was 6.5% (2,585/39,867). Among the total number of insertion attempts, 9,637 (24.2%) were consistent with both the weight-based and sex-based sizing method, 10,738 (26.9%) were consistent with the weight- but not sex-based sizing method, 5,527 (13.9%) were consistent with the sex- but not weight-based method, and 13,965 (35.0%) were consistent with neither method. The rate of unsuccessful i-gel placement was similar when i-gel devices were placed in alignment with a sex-based size selection method in comparison to i-gel placement in alignment with a weight-based selection strategy (6.0 vs. 6.4%). Logistic regression analysis did not reveal a significant difference between groups (OR: 1.08 [0.95, 1.23]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of a sex-based method of i-gel size selection may be equivalent with respect to the rate of unsuccessful i-gel placement on the first attempt in comparison to a weight-based method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Page 368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}