首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Osteopathic Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Scholar 12 longitudinal outcomes: osteopathic research development application to facilitate scholarly activity during the pandemic and beyond. 学者12纵向结果:骨科研究发展应用,以促进大流行期间及以后的学术活动。
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2025-0041
Marija J Rowane, Kevin A Thomas, Travis M Smith, Mark A Terrel, Michael P Rowane, Robert W Hostoffer

Context: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated a rapid transformation in medical education and research. Online learning became the standard to supplement in-person training and maintain accreditation requirements. Scholar 12 was constructed from the Scholar Series foundational lectures and a Master of Science in Medical Education thesis into a comprehensive research development platform accessible to all learners and institutions (https://scholar12.org).

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to involve students and faculty in a free, interactive virtual platform to address osteopathic literature deficits and scholarly activity criteria, promote new generational learning of research skills, build scholarly culture, and to employ Scholar 12 in a group-mentor research poster project to encourage osteopathic medical student participation in osteopathic-focused research.

Methods: A blinded, multi-campus, optional presurvey was digitally administered to third-year osteopathic medical students, prior to completing the Scholar 12 program, in collaboration with junior faculty mentors, during their Geriatrics/Osteopathic Principles and Practices (OPP) core rotation. Students self-reported their research skill competency relevant to each learning unit, on a 5-point Likert scale, before and after completing Scholar 12. Additional survey questions assessed the efficacy of the group mentor model and the quantity of further research presentations.

Results: Students' self-reported research skill competency scores significantly improved (p=4.53 × 10e-8) after completion of Scholar 12, in comparison of the composite presurvey (n=1,800, 75.0 % response rate) vs. postsurvey responses (n=1,200, 50.0 % response rate), over four academic years (2020-24). Poster presentations for institutional research day grew an average of 166 % per academic year, after the introduction of Scholar 12, from 40 posters in 2019-2020 to 278 posters in 2023-2024.

Conclusions: The successful Scholar 12 implementation into a medical school curriculum demonstrated sustainable institutional scholarly activity growth through four consecutive academic years. Scholar 12 offers an accessible research learning platform relevant to undergraduate and graduate medical education objectives.

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行要求医学教育和研究迅速转型。在线学习成为了补充现场培训和保持认证要求的标准。Scholar 12是由Scholar系列基础讲座和医学教育硕士论文构建而成的一个全面的研究开发平台,所有学习者和机构都可以访问(https://scholar12.org).Objectives:本研究的目的是让学生和教师参与到一个自由、互动的虚拟平台中,以解决骨科文献的不足和学术活动标准,促进新一代研究技能的学习,建立学术文化,并在一个小组导师研究海报项目中雇用学者12,以鼓励骨科医学学生参与以骨科为重点的研究。方法:在老年医学/骨科原理与实践(OPP)核心轮转期间,在完成学者12项目之前,与初级教师导师合作,对三年级骨科医学学生进行了一项盲法、多校区可选的数字调查。学生在完成Scholar 12之前和之后,以5分李克特量表自我报告他们与每个学习单元相关的研究技能能力。额外的调查问题评估了小组导师模式的有效性和进一步研究报告的数量。结果:在完成Scholar 12课程后,学生自我报告的研究技能能力得分显著提高(p=4.53 × 10e-8),在四个学年(2020-24)的综合调查前(n= 1800, 75.0 %回复率)与调查后(n= 1200, 50.0 %回复率)进行了比较。在引入Scholar 12之后,机构研究日的海报展示每学年平均增长了166 %,从2019-2020年的40张海报增加到2023-2024年的278张海报。结论:Scholar 12在医学院课程中的成功实施表明,通过连续四个学年,机构学术活动持续增长。Scholar 12提供了一个与本科和研究生医学教育目标相关的可访问的研究学习平台。
{"title":"Scholar 12 longitudinal outcomes: osteopathic research development application to facilitate scholarly activity during the pandemic and beyond.","authors":"Marija J Rowane, Kevin A Thomas, Travis M Smith, Mark A Terrel, Michael P Rowane, Robert W Hostoffer","doi":"10.1515/jom-2025-0041","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2025-0041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated a rapid transformation in medical education and research. Online learning became the standard to supplement in-person training and maintain accreditation requirements. Scholar 12 was constructed from the Scholar Series foundational lectures and a Master of Science in Medical Education thesis into a comprehensive research development platform accessible to all learners and institutions (https://scholar12.org).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to involve students and faculty in a free, interactive virtual platform to address osteopathic literature deficits and scholarly activity criteria, promote new generational learning of research skills, build scholarly culture, and to employ Scholar 12 in a group-mentor research poster project to encourage osteopathic medical student participation in osteopathic-focused research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A blinded, multi-campus, optional presurvey was digitally administered to third-year osteopathic medical students, prior to completing the Scholar 12 program, in collaboration with junior faculty mentors, during their Geriatrics/Osteopathic Principles and Practices (OPP) core rotation. Students self-reported their research skill competency relevant to each learning unit, on a 5-point Likert scale, before and after completing Scholar 12. Additional survey questions assessed the efficacy of the group mentor model and the quantity of further research presentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students' self-reported research skill competency scores significantly improved (p=4.53 × 10e<sup>-8</sup>) after completion of Scholar 12, in comparison of the composite presurvey (n=1,800, 75.0 % response rate) vs. postsurvey responses (n=1,200, 50.0 % response rate), over four academic years (2020-24). Poster presentations for institutional research day grew an average of 166 % per academic year, after the introduction of Scholar 12, from 40 posters in 2019-2020 to 278 posters in 2023-2024.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The successful Scholar 12 implementation into a medical school curriculum demonstrated sustainable institutional scholarly activity growth through four consecutive academic years. Scholar 12 offers an accessible research learning platform relevant to undergraduate and graduate medical education objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"539-545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144217146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A swell case. 好案子。
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-06-03 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0055
Lauren Fill, Robert W Hostoffer
{"title":"A swell case.","authors":"Lauren Fill, Robert W Hostoffer","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0055","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2023-0055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"561-562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144217145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The epidemiology of osteopathic diagnoses and treatments in United States emergency departments from 2018 to 2021. 2018年至2021年美国急诊科骨科诊断和治疗的流行病学
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0261
Aviya Distefano, Hanna Harris, Kaitlin M Bowers, Dhimitri A Nikolla

Context: Although a large proportion of US emergency physicians are osteopathic physicians (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DOs]), the frequency of osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) use in emergency departments (EDs) is unknown.

Objectives: We aimed to estimate the frequency of OMM in EDs across the US and describe the cohort who received OMM.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of ED patients from 2018 to 2021 in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Encounters with OMM were identified by diagnosis and procedure codes. We calculated weighted frequencies of encounters with OMM per 100,000 ED encounters with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) by year, accounting for the complex survey design of NEDS.

Results: We identified 9,576 encounters with OMM during the study period. The weighted frequency of encounters with OMM per 100,000 ED encounters was 6.9 (95 % CI, 3.8 to 11.5) for 2018, 8.6 (4.3-15.5) for 2019, 12.6 (3.5-32.0) for 2020, and 5.5 (3.3-8.5) for 2021. Most patients were female (5,669, 59.2 %) with a median age of 53 (interquartile range [IQR] 36 to 67). The majority were from metropolitan teaching hospitals (7,094, 74.1 %), and about half were admitted (4,565, 47.7 %). The most common osteopathic diagnosis code was segmental and somatic dysfunction of the thoracic region (4,202 of 21,358 [19.7 %] codes).

Conclusions: OMM is infrequently provided across hospital-owned US EDs. Further research is needed to describe the frequency of OMM across all acute care settings.

背景:虽然大部分美国急诊医生都是骨科医生(骨科医学博士[DOs]),但在急诊科(ed)使用骨科手法医学(OMM)的频率尚不清楚。目的:我们旨在估计美国急诊科中OMM的频率,并描述接受OMM的队列。方法:我们对全国急诊科样本(NEDS)、医疗成本与利用项目(HCUP)、卫生保健研究与质量局2018年至2021年的ED患者进行回顾性队列研究。通过诊断和程序代码确定与OMM的接触。考虑到NEDS的复杂调查设计,我们以每年95% %的置信区间(ci)计算了每100,000次ED遭遇的OMM加权频率。结果:在研究期间,我们确定了9576例OMM病例。2018年每100,000次ED遭遇OMM的加权频率为6.9(95 % CI, 3.8至11.5),2019年为8.6(4.3-15.5),2020年为12.6(3.5-32.0),2021年为5.5(3.3-8.5)。大多数患者为女性(5,669例,59.2 %),中位年龄为53岁(四分位数间距[IQR] 36 ~ 67)。绝大多数来自城市教学医院(7094例,74.1 %),约有一半住院(4565例,47.7 %)。最常见的骨病诊断代码是胸椎区域的节段性和躯体功能障碍(21,358个代码中有4,202个[19.7 %])。结论:医院拥有的美国急诊科很少提供OMM。需要进一步的研究来描述所有急性护理环境中OMM的频率。
{"title":"The epidemiology of osteopathic diagnoses and treatments in United States emergency departments from 2018 to 2021.","authors":"Aviya Distefano, Hanna Harris, Kaitlin M Bowers, Dhimitri A Nikolla","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0261","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although a large proportion of US emergency physicians are osteopathic physicians (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DOs]), the frequency of osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) use in emergency departments (EDs) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to estimate the frequency of OMM in EDs across the US and describe the cohort who received OMM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of ED patients from 2018 to 2021 in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Encounters with OMM were identified by diagnosis and procedure codes. We calculated weighted frequencies of encounters with OMM per 100,000 ED encounters with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) by year, accounting for the complex survey design of NEDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 9,576 encounters with OMM during the study period. The weighted frequency of encounters with OMM per 100,000 ED encounters was 6.9 (95 % CI, 3.8 to 11.5) for 2018, 8.6 (4.3-15.5) for 2019, 12.6 (3.5-32.0) for 2020, and 5.5 (3.3-8.5) for 2021. Most patients were female (5,669, 59.2 %) with a median age of 53 (interquartile range [IQR] 36 to 67). The majority were from metropolitan teaching hospitals (7,094, 74.1 %), and about half were admitted (4,565, 47.7 %). The most common osteopathic diagnosis code was segmental and somatic dysfunction of the thoracic region (4,202 of 21,358 [19.7 %] codes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OMM is infrequently provided across hospital-owned US EDs. Further research is needed to describe the frequency of OMM across all acute care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"449-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144152139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of osteopathic manual treatment in the elderly population: a scoping review of clinical evidence. 老年人群骨疗法手工治疗的有效性:临床证据的范围审查。
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0249
Livio Molinari, Luca Mingrone, Emanuele Novelli

Context: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is an emerging nonpharmacological intervention utilized to address various health conditions, particularly among the elderly population. This scoping review aims to examine the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of OMT in improving pain, balance, and quality of life in geriatric patients, identifying gaps in the current research and suggesting future directions.

Objectives: This scoping review aims to evaluate the efficacy of OMT in elderly patients by analyzing selected studies that specifically explore its effects on balance, quality of life, and pain management. Additionally, this review will assess the current quality of evidence regarding these outcomes.

Methods: Selected articles from December 2012 to September 2024 focused on OMT in individuals aged 65 and older. We conducted a systematic literature search utilizing Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms combined with the Boolean operator "AND," including: OMT, osteopathic manipulative treatment, osteopathic medicine, aging, older adult, elderly, aged, and geriatric people. Databases, including PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and others, were searched from June 3, 2024 to September 3, 2024 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Three authors (L.M., E.N., L.M.) reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full texts to determine eligibility. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Filters included studies involving human subjects and studies published in English, Spanish, or Italian. Exclusions were made for literature reviews, protocols, commentaries, and nonosteopathic manual techniques.

Results: A total of 2,478 articles were identified; then, after removing 1,564 duplicates, 917 articles remained for screening. These articles were assessed based on their titles and abstracts, leading to the exclusion of 873 articles according to the established exclusion criteria. In the final phase, the remaining 44 articles underwent a full-text evaluation. This process resulted in the exclusion of 21 articles that were not randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 articles that did not meet the required outcome measures. Ultimately, a total of nine articles were included in the systematic review.

Conclusions: This study highlights the effectiveness of OMT in improving pain, balance, and quality of life in geriatric patients. The findings underscore the value of OMT as a personalized therapeutic approach, promoting healthier aging and enhancing overall well-being in the elderly population. Further research is encouraged to explore the full potential of OMT, supporting its integration as a key component of osteopathic care for geriatric patients.

背景:整骨疗法手法治疗(OMT)是一种新兴的非药物干预手段,用于解决各种健康状况,特别是在老年人中。本综述旨在研究OMT在改善老年患者疼痛、平衡和生活质量方面的有效性的现有证据,确定当前研究中的差距,并提出未来的研究方向。目的:本综述旨在通过分析特定研究来评估OMT对老年患者的疗效,这些研究专门探讨了OMT对平衡、生活质量和疼痛管理的影响。此外,本综述将评估目前有关这些结果的证据质量。方法:选取2012年12月至2024年9月65岁及以上人群的OMT相关文章。我们利用医学主题词(MeSH)和自由文本术语结合布尔运算符“and”进行了系统的文献检索,包括:OMT、整骨疗法手法治疗、整骨疗法医学、衰老、老年人、老年、老年和老年人群。数据库包括PubMed、SCOPUS、Cochrane Library等,检索时间为2024年6月3日至2024年9月3日,检索时间为2024年6月3日至2024年9月3日,检索对象为系统评价和meta分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)指南。三位作者(L.M., e.n., L.M.)审查了标题、摘要和全文以确定是否合格。分歧通过讨论得到解决。筛选包括涉及人类受试者的研究和以英语、西班牙语或意大利语发表的研究。排除文献综述、方案、评论和非整骨疗法的手工技术。结果:共纳入2478篇文献;然后,在去除1564个重复项后,剩下917个条目进行筛选。根据这些文章的标题和摘要对其进行评估,根据既定的排除标准排除了873篇文章。在最后阶段,对其余44篇文章进行全文评价。该过程排除了21篇非随机对照试验(rct)和14篇不符合要求的结局指标的文章。最终,共有9篇文章被纳入系统评价。结论:本研究强调了OMT在改善老年患者疼痛、平衡和生活质量方面的有效性。研究结果强调了OMT作为一种个性化治疗方法的价值,它可以促进老年人更健康地老龄化,提高老年人的整体幸福感。鼓励进一步研究以探索OMT的全部潜力,支持其作为老年患者整骨疗法护理的关键组成部分。
{"title":"Effectiveness of osteopathic manual treatment in the elderly population: a scoping review of clinical evidence.","authors":"Livio Molinari, Luca Mingrone, Emanuele Novelli","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0249","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is an emerging nonpharmacological intervention utilized to address various health conditions, particularly among the elderly population. This scoping review aims to examine the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of OMT in improving pain, balance, and quality of life in geriatric patients, identifying gaps in the current research and suggesting future directions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aims to evaluate the efficacy of OMT in elderly patients by analyzing selected studies that specifically explore its effects on balance, quality of life, and pain management. Additionally, this review will assess the current quality of evidence regarding these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Selected articles from December 2012 to September 2024 focused on OMT in individuals aged 65 and older. We conducted a systematic literature search utilizing Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms combined with the Boolean operator \"AND,\" including: OMT, osteopathic manipulative treatment, osteopathic medicine, aging, older adult, elderly, aged, and geriatric people. Databases, including PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and others, were searched from June 3, 2024 to September 3, 2024 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Three authors (L.M., E.N., L.M.) reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full texts to determine eligibility. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Filters included studies involving human subjects and studies published in English, Spanish, or Italian. Exclusions were made for literature reviews, protocols, commentaries, and nonosteopathic manual techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,478 articles were identified; then, after removing 1,564 duplicates, 917 articles remained for screening. These articles were assessed based on their titles and abstracts, leading to the exclusion of 873 articles according to the established exclusion criteria. In the final phase, the remaining 44 articles underwent a full-text evaluation. This process resulted in the exclusion of 21 articles that were not randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 articles that did not meet the required outcome measures. Ultimately, a total of nine articles were included in the systematic review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the effectiveness of OMT in improving pain, balance, and quality of life in geriatric patients. The findings underscore the value of OMT as a personalized therapeutic approach, promoting healthier aging and enhancing overall well-being in the elderly population. Further research is encouraged to explore the full potential of OMT, supporting its integration as a key component of osteopathic care for geriatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"497-505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144180247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medical student perceptions of psychiatric conditions and the impact of stigmatizing language. 医学生对精神疾病的认知及污名化语言的影响。
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0263
Zach Monahan, Vivian Stevens, Micah Hartwell, Alicia Ito Ford

Context: Mental health conditions have been subject to significant societal stigma, which impacts the self-perception of people with mental illness and can impact their decision to seek treatment. General practitioners in the United States report overall negative attitudes toward people with severe mental illness; however, there are few studies into the beliefs of medical students on people with mental illnesses as well as the impact of stigmatizing language on these beliefs.

Objectives: The objectives of this survey were to evaluate the impact of stigmatizing language on medical students' responses to case presentations of mental illnesses, and to determine how these perceptions vary across the course of medical education.

Methods: We conducted an online survey wherein medical student participants reviewed psychiatric case vignettes, which varied in their use of either person-centered language (PCL) or stigmatizing language. All current students at the authors' institution were sent the survey link via email. Participants rated the case for symptom severity, their likelihood to recommend hospitalization, their level of comfort and safety when interviewing the patient, the trustworthiness of the patient's report, and the likelihood that the condition would improve over the next year. For analysis, these responses were summed to yield a Student Perception Index Score from 1 to 60, with 60 being the "most stigmatizing" perspective (i.e., lowest comfort, most likely to hospitalize, etc.).

Results: There were 87 total respondents, of which 44 answered the Stigmatizing vignettes and 43 answered the PCL vignettes, with roughly even respondents per year in school. Overall, there was not a significant difference between the PCL and stigmatizing language versions (p=0.73 for the major depression case; p=0.29 for the schizophrenia case). However, compared to first-year medical students, third-year students had significantly higher Student Perception Index Scores for the stigmatizing depression case (p=0.002), and fourth-year students had significantly higher stigma scores for the PCL depression case (p=0.02).

Conclusions: Although there was no overall difference between the average Index Scores for the PCL and stigmatizing versions of the case presentations, significant differences in the Index Scores of certain presentations for students undergoing clinical education indicate that some targeted education on mental health stigma may be beneficial for third- and fourth-year medical students. Teaching empathetic approaches to patients with mental illness, regardless of whether their presentation was "stigmatizing," emphasizes the holistic care expected through the osteopathic tenet describing the interconnectedness of mind, body, and spirit.

背景:精神健康状况一直受到严重的社会歧视,这影响了精神疾病患者的自我认知,并可能影响他们寻求治疗的决定。美国的全科医生对患有严重精神疾病的人总体持消极态度;然而,很少有关于医学生对精神疾病患者的信念以及污名化语言对这些信念的影响的研究。目的:本调查的目的是评估污名化语言对医学生对精神疾病病例报告的反应的影响,并确定这些看法在医学教育过程中如何变化。方法:我们进行了一项在线调查,其中医学生参与者回顾了精神病学案例,这些案例在使用以人为中心的语言(PCL)或污名化语言方面有所不同。作者所在机构的所有在校生都通过电子邮件发送了调查链接。参与者根据症状严重程度、建议住院治疗的可能性、采访患者时的舒适和安全程度、患者报告的可信度以及病情在未来一年内改善的可能性对病例进行了评分。为了进行分析,这些回答被总结为学生感知指数得分,从1到60,60是“最污名化”的观点(即最低的舒适度,最有可能住院,等等)。结果:共有87名被调查者,其中有44人回答了污名化的小短文,43人回答了PCL的小短文,每年在学校的被调查者大致相等。总体而言,PCL和污名化语言版本之间没有显著差异(重度抑郁症病例p=0.73;精神分裂症患者P =0.29)。然而,与一年级学生相比,三年级学生对污名化抑郁症的学生知觉指数得分显著高于一年级学生(p=0.002),四年级学生对PCL抑郁症的污名化得分显著高于一年级学生(p=0.02)。结论:尽管PCL和污名化版本的病例报告的平均指数得分之间没有总体差异,但接受临床教育的学生的某些报告的指数得分存在显著差异,这表明一些有针对性的心理健康污名化教育可能对三年级和四年级的医学生有益。对患有精神疾病的病人教授同理心的方法,不管他们的表现是否被“污名化”,强调通过整骨疗法的原则来描述思想、身体和精神的相互联系所期望的整体护理。
{"title":"Medical student perceptions of psychiatric conditions and the impact of stigmatizing language.","authors":"Zach Monahan, Vivian Stevens, Micah Hartwell, Alicia Ito Ford","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0263","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Mental health conditions have been subject to significant societal stigma, which impacts the self-perception of people with mental illness and can impact their decision to seek treatment. General practitioners in the United States report overall negative attitudes toward people with severe mental illness; however, there are few studies into the beliefs of medical students on people with mental illnesses as well as the impact of stigmatizing language on these beliefs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this survey were to evaluate the impact of stigmatizing language on medical students' responses to case presentations of mental illnesses, and to determine how these perceptions vary across the course of medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online survey wherein medical student participants reviewed psychiatric case vignettes, which varied in their use of either person-centered language (PCL) or stigmatizing language. All current students at the authors' institution were sent the survey link via email. Participants rated the case for symptom severity, their likelihood to recommend hospitalization, their level of comfort and safety when interviewing the patient, the trustworthiness of the patient's report, and the likelihood that the condition would improve over the next year. For analysis, these responses were summed to yield a Student Perception Index Score from 1 to 60, with 60 being the \"most stigmatizing\" perspective (i.e., lowest comfort, most likely to hospitalize, etc.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 87 total respondents, of which 44 answered the Stigmatizing vignettes and 43 answered the PCL vignettes, with roughly even respondents per year in school. Overall, there was not a significant difference between the PCL and stigmatizing language versions (p=0.73 for the major depression case; p=0.29 for the schizophrenia case). However, compared to first-year medical students, third-year students had significantly higher Student Perception Index Scores for the stigmatizing depression case (p=0.002), and fourth-year students had significantly higher stigma scores for the PCL depression case (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was no overall difference between the average Index Scores for the PCL and stigmatizing versions of the case presentations, significant differences in the Index Scores of certain presentations for students undergoing clinical education indicate that some targeted education on mental health stigma may be beneficial for third- and fourth-year medical students. Teaching empathetic approaches to patients with mental illness, regardless of whether their presentation was \"stigmatizing,\" emphasizes the holistic care expected through the osteopathic tenet describing the interconnectedness of mind, body, and spirit.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"427-433"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144052558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency department wait times in concordance with blood alcohol content and subsequent alcohol use disorder. 急诊科等待时间与血液酒精含量和随后的酒精使用障碍一致。
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0168
Sean Hayes, Kaylee Mach, Jennifer Briggs, Micah Hartwell
<p><strong>Context: </strong>In the United States, nearly 80 % of the adult population reported lifetime alcohol use, with 50 % of those reporting alcohol consumption within the past 30 days in 2019. The expense of excess alcohol intake was estimated to have an annual associated healthcare cost of $28 billion, and there was greater than $221 billion in additional costs due to the detrimental effects of excess alcohol intake on productivity and societal setbacks over the last year. Alcohol use disorder (AUD) provides a major barrier for patients seeking medical treatment, because AUD is consistently regarded as one of the most stigmatized disorders globally. Provider-based discrimination toward patients with AUD may lead to providing a lower quality of care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to assess whether patients with a history of AUD and/or positive blood alcohol content (BAC+) affect emergency department (ED) wait times. We hypothesized that patients presenting to the ED with AUD+/BAC+ would have longer wait times. Secondarily, we investigated the impacts of sociodemographics within these analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2019-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). Individuals' primary diagnosis had to be of musculoskeletal origin based on ICD-10 codes starting with 'S' for skeletal or bodily injuries or 'M' for diagnoses related to musculoskeletal or connective tissue conditions. Wait time was quantified from time of entry into the triage system to the time patients were seen by the first provider. We included data points with or without a recorded history of alcohol misuse or dependence (AUD<sup>+/-</sup>) in their chart and those with a positive or negative blood alcohol content (BAC<sup>+/-</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ED wait times among individuals presenting with musculoskeletal injuries with a current history of AUD presenting with BAC- at the time of triage were not significantly different from those without a history of AUD. Individuals who were BAC+ at the time of triage had shorter wait times regardless of AUD history - and only AUD-/BAC+ had shorter wait times. Our binary regression and adjusted models showed that individuals who were AUD-/BAC+ had a significantly shorter wait time (minimum -18.43, standard error [SE]=1.92, <i>t</i>=-9.59, p<0.001; SE=2.97; <i>t</i>=-5.62, p<0.001) compared to individuals who were AUD-/BAC- respectively. Those who were AUD+/BAC+ also had shorter wait times compared to AUD-/BAC- (min=-11.11, SE=4.05; t=-2.75, p=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our study showed no significant difference in ED wait times between individuals with and without a history of AUD - indicating that AUD history does not delay being seen. Shorter wait times for those entering the ED BAC+ may be due to their immediate need for treatment due to toxicity or alcohol withdrawal syndrome, having more
背景:在美国,近80% %的成年人报告终生饮酒,其中50% %的人报告在2019年过去30天内饮酒。据估计,过量饮酒每年带来的相关医疗成本为280亿美元,去年,由于过量饮酒对生产力和社会挫折的有害影响,额外成本超过2210亿美元。酒精使用障碍(AUD)是患者寻求医疗治疗的主要障碍,因为AUD一直被认为是全球最受歧视的疾病之一。提供者对AUD患者的歧视可能导致提供较低质量的护理。目的:我们的目的是评估有AUD病史和/或血液酒精含量(BAC+)阳性的患者是否会影响急诊科(ED)的等待时间。我们假设AUD+/BAC+的患者就诊于急诊科的等待时间较长。其次,我们在这些分析中调查了社会人口统计学的影响。方法:对2019-2021年全国医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)进行横断面分析。根据ICD-10编码,个体的初步诊断必须是肌肉骨骼起源,骨骼或身体损伤以“S”开头,与肌肉骨骼或结缔组织疾病相关的诊断以“M”开头。等待时间被量化,从进入分诊系统的时间到患者被第一个提供者看到的时间。我们在他们的图表中纳入了有或没有酒精滥用或依赖史(AUD+/-)的数据点,以及血液酒精含量(BAC+/-)呈阳性或阴性的数据点。结果:在分诊时,目前有AUD病史且有BAC的肌肉骨骼损伤患者的ED等待时间与没有AUD病史的患者没有显著差异。无论AUD病史如何,在分诊时BAC+的患者等待时间较短,只有AUD-/BAC+的患者等待时间较短。我们的二元回归和调整模型显示,AUD-/BAC+个体的等待时间显著缩短(最小值为-18.43,标准误差[SE]=1.92, t=-9.59, pt=-5.62, p)。结论:总体而言,我们的研究显示,有和没有AUD病史的个体在ED等待时间上没有显著差异,这表明AUD病史不会延迟就诊。进入ED BAC+的患者等待时间较短,可能是因为他们因中毒或酒精戒断综合征而立即需要治疗,受伤更严重,或伤害预防。
{"title":"Emergency department wait times in concordance with blood alcohol content and subsequent alcohol use disorder.","authors":"Sean Hayes, Kaylee Mach, Jennifer Briggs, Micah Hartwell","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0168","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0168","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Context: &lt;/strong&gt;In the United States, nearly 80 % of the adult population reported lifetime alcohol use, with 50 % of those reporting alcohol consumption within the past 30 days in 2019. The expense of excess alcohol intake was estimated to have an annual associated healthcare cost of $28 billion, and there was greater than $221 billion in additional costs due to the detrimental effects of excess alcohol intake on productivity and societal setbacks over the last year. Alcohol use disorder (AUD) provides a major barrier for patients seeking medical treatment, because AUD is consistently regarded as one of the most stigmatized disorders globally. Provider-based discrimination toward patients with AUD may lead to providing a lower quality of care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;Our objective was to assess whether patients with a history of AUD and/or positive blood alcohol content (BAC+) affect emergency department (ED) wait times. We hypothesized that patients presenting to the ED with AUD+/BAC+ would have longer wait times. Secondarily, we investigated the impacts of sociodemographics within these analyses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2019-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). Individuals' primary diagnosis had to be of musculoskeletal origin based on ICD-10 codes starting with 'S' for skeletal or bodily injuries or 'M' for diagnoses related to musculoskeletal or connective tissue conditions. Wait time was quantified from time of entry into the triage system to the time patients were seen by the first provider. We included data points with or without a recorded history of alcohol misuse or dependence (AUD&lt;sup&gt;+/-&lt;/sup&gt;) in their chart and those with a positive or negative blood alcohol content (BAC&lt;sup&gt;+/-&lt;/sup&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;ED wait times among individuals presenting with musculoskeletal injuries with a current history of AUD presenting with BAC- at the time of triage were not significantly different from those without a history of AUD. Individuals who were BAC+ at the time of triage had shorter wait times regardless of AUD history - and only AUD-/BAC+ had shorter wait times. Our binary regression and adjusted models showed that individuals who were AUD-/BAC+ had a significantly shorter wait time (minimum -18.43, standard error [SE]=1.92, &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;=-9.59, p&lt;0.001; SE=2.97; &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;=-5.62, p&lt;0.001) compared to individuals who were AUD-/BAC- respectively. Those who were AUD+/BAC+ also had shorter wait times compared to AUD-/BAC- (min=-11.11, SE=4.05; t=-2.75, p=0.006).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Overall, our study showed no significant difference in ED wait times between individuals with and without a history of AUD - indicating that AUD history does not delay being seen. Shorter wait times for those entering the ED BAC+ may be due to their immediate need for treatment due to toxicity or alcohol withdrawal syndrome, having more ","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"553-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144038478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geographical distribution of osteopathic urology residents and match trends in the United States. 美国骨科泌尿外科住院医师的地理分布和匹配趋势。
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0252
Ryan Wong, Bebe Eke, Andrew D Vogel, Bracken Burns, Kristen Conrad-Schnetz

Context: Applying into urology residency is highly competitive. Disparities in osteopathic (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO]) representation exist within the current urology workforce.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the number of DO graduates in urology residency programs over time and map their current distribution throughout the United States.

Methods: All US urology residency programs for the 2023-2024 academic year were identified, and residents' postgraduate year and degrees, and the program's states, were collected from each program's websites. DO residents were stratified by their postgraduate years to observe the trends in the number of urology residents over the past 5 years. Their geographical distribution was evaluated. The number of DO urology residents per state and their ratio among all urology residents per state were examined.

Results: Among 135 urology residency programs analyzed, 1753 urology residents were identified. Ninety-nine residents hold a DO degree from a total of 39 urology programs (28.9 %). The number of DOs that matched into urology has been steadily increasing from 15 in 2019 to 26 in 2023 (R 2=0.8556, p=0.0244). Michigan had the greatest number of DO urology residents (n=35). Pennsylvania (n=10, 7.81 %) and South Carolina (n=10, 40 %) had the second highest. Illinois (n=7, 7.14 %) had the third highest. More than half of the states with urology residency programs had no DO residents (n=27, 62.8 %).

Conclusions: Osteopathic medical training plays an important role in the urology workforce, and there is an increased recognition of DOs within urology residency programs in the United States. In the era of urologist shortages, efforts to support the contributions of DOs in underserved and rural communities may have a profound impact in this field.

背景:泌尿外科住院医师的竞争非常激烈。在目前的泌尿外科工作人员中,骨科医生(骨科医学医生[DO])的代表性存在差异。目的:本研究旨在调查泌尿外科住院医师项目中DO毕业生的数量,并绘制出他们在美国的分布情况。方法:确定2023-2024学年的所有美国泌尿外科住院医师项目,并从每个项目的网站上收集住院医师的研究生学年和学位,以及项目所在的州。根据毕业年限对住院医师进行分层,观察过去5年泌尿外科住院医师人数的变化趋势。评估了它们的地理分布。检查了每个州的DO泌尿外科住院医师的数量及其在每个州所有泌尿外科住院医师中的比例。结果:在分析的135个泌尿外科住院医师项目中,确定了1753名泌尿外科住院医师。共有39个泌尿科项目的99名住院医师拥有DO学位(28.9 %)。与泌尿外科匹配的DOs数量从2019年的15名稳步增加到2023年的26名(r2 =0.8556, p=0.0244)。密歇根州有最多的DO泌尿外科住院医师(n=35)。宾夕法尼亚州(n= 10,7.81 %)和南卡罗来纳州(n= 10,40 %)第二高。伊利诺伊州(n=7, 7.14 %)排名第三。超过一半有泌尿外科住院医师项目的州没有DO住院医师(n= 27,62.8 %)。结论:骨科医学培训在泌尿外科工作人员中扮演着重要的角色,在美国泌尿外科住院医师项目中,对DOs的认可程度越来越高。在泌尿科医生短缺的时代,在服务不足的农村社区支持DOs的贡献可能会对这一领域产生深远的影响。
{"title":"Geographical distribution of osteopathic urology residents and match trends in the United States.","authors":"Ryan Wong, Bebe Eke, Andrew D Vogel, Bracken Burns, Kristen Conrad-Schnetz","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0252","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Applying into urology residency is highly competitive. Disparities in osteopathic (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO]) representation exist within the current urology workforce.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the number of DO graduates in urology residency programs over time and map their current distribution throughout the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All US urology residency programs for the 2023-2024 academic year were identified, and residents' postgraduate year and degrees, and the program's states, were collected from each program's websites. DO residents were stratified by their postgraduate years to observe the trends in the number of urology residents over the past 5 years. Their geographical distribution was evaluated. The number of DO urology residents per state and their ratio among all urology residents per state were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 135 urology residency programs analyzed, 1753 urology residents were identified. Ninety-nine residents hold a DO degree from a total of 39 urology programs (28.9 %). The number of DOs that matched into urology has been steadily increasing from 15 in 2019 to 26 in 2023 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>=0.8556, p=0.0244). Michigan had the greatest number of DO urology residents (n=35). Pennsylvania (n=10, 7.81 %) and South Carolina (n=10, 40 %) had the second highest. Illinois (n=7, 7.14 %) had the third highest. More than half of the states with urology residency programs had no DO residents (n=27, 62.8 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Osteopathic medical training plays an important role in the urology workforce, and there is an increased recognition of DOs within urology residency programs in the United States. In the era of urologist shortages, efforts to support the contributions of DOs in underserved and rural communities may have a profound impact in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"533-537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144017992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Signs and symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency secondary to atherosclerosis: a systematic review. 继发于动脉粥样硬化的椎基底动脉功能不全的体征和症状:一项系统综述
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0203
Chris Moors, Claire Stapleton

Context: Clinicians face a difficult challenge in identifying vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) resulting from atherosclerosis. VBI is a term utilized to describe a reduction in blood flow to the vertebral and basilar arteries that supply the posterior cerebral system. For musculoskeletal clinicians, diagnostic differentiation of VBI is essential, because its presence directly impacts the clinical use of manual treatment interventions. Clinical guidelines provide a set of cardinal symptoms (inclusive of Coman's 5D's) in which VBI may manifest, the accuracy of which is under contestation because literature provides evidence suggesting a wider set of symptoms.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to gather all relevant literature reporting features of VBI pertaining to atherosclerosis, with the aim to help provide evidence that may guide clinical practice in the use of manual therapy interventions and to raise awareness of the manifestations that VBI may present.

Methods: Six databases were searched from inception to September 2024 (Allied and Alternative Medicine Database [AMED], AgeLine, SPORTDiscus, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online [MEDLINE], Cochrane, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL Plus). Articles were screened in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, The included articles required a diagnosis of VBI through clinical examination with radiological evidence of atherosclerotic lesions, without evidence of existing or previous neurological infarcts, concomitant arterial pathology, or any other form of pathological mechanism. Primary data were extracted utilizing a template, and the methodological quality was assessed utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Findings were summarized utilizing a narrative synthesis and a table of descriptive statistics.

Results: Two hundred and eighty-three papers were identified, and 15 were included (93 cases, 50M/43F, age 64 years old ± 9 standard deviation [SD] yrs). Vertigo was the most common reported symptom, within a total of 37 different symptoms reported either in isolation or combination. Symptoms inclusive to Coman's 5D's accounted for 22 % of reported features.

Conclusions: Vertigo is the most common symptom (27.7 %) of VBI induced by atherosclerosis. However, there is not sufficient data to make concrete conclusions, although results do instill doubt over the sole use of Coman's 5D's in clinical practice. Prospective observational studies with standardized data extraction for VBI symptoms and their pattern of behavior are warranted.

背景:临床医生在识别由动脉粥样硬化引起的椎基底动脉功能不全(VBI)方面面临着困难的挑战。VBI是一个用来描述供应大脑后系统的椎动脉和基底动脉的血流量减少的术语。对于肌肉骨骼临床医生来说,VBI的诊断鉴别是必不可少的,因为它的存在直接影响到手工治疗干预的临床使用。临床指南提供了一组VBI可能表现的主要症状(包括Coman's 5D),其准确性存在争议,因为文献提供的证据表明症状范围更广。目的:本研究的目的是收集所有与动脉粥样硬化相关的VBI特征的相关文献报道,旨在帮助提供证据,指导临床实践中使用手工治疗干预措施,并提高对VBI可能表现的认识。方法:检索6个数据库(联合与替代医学数据库[AMED]、AgeLine、SPORTDiscus、医学文献分析与在线检索系统[MEDLINE]、Cochrane和护理与联合健康累积指数(CINAHL Plus)),检索时间自成立至2024年9月。文章按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)标准的首选报告项目进行筛选,纳入的文章要求通过临床检查诊断为VBI,有动脉粥样硬化病变的影像学证据,没有现有或既往的神经梗死、伴随动脉病理或任何其他形式的病理机制的证据。使用模板提取原始数据,并使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估方法学质量。利用叙述综合和描述性统计表对调查结果进行了总结。结果:共纳入文献283篇,纳入文献15篇(93例,50米/43英尺,年龄64岁±9标准差[SD]年)。眩晕是最常见的报告症状,在总共37种不同的单独或联合报告的症状中。包括Coman's 5D的症状占报告特征的22% %。结论:眩晕是动脉粥样硬化所致VBI最常见的症状(27.7 %)。然而,没有足够的数据来得出具体的结论,尽管结果确实对科曼5D在临床实践中的单独使用产生了怀疑。对VBI症状及其行为模式进行标准化数据提取的前瞻性观察研究是必要的。
{"title":"Signs and symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency secondary to atherosclerosis: a systematic review.","authors":"Chris Moors, Claire Stapleton","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0203","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Clinicians face a difficult challenge in identifying vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) resulting from atherosclerosis. VBI is a term utilized to describe a reduction in blood flow to the vertebral and basilar arteries that supply the posterior cerebral system. For musculoskeletal clinicians, diagnostic differentiation of VBI is essential, because its presence directly impacts the clinical use of manual treatment interventions. Clinical guidelines provide a set of cardinal symptoms (inclusive of Coman's 5D's) in which VBI may manifest, the accuracy of which is under contestation because literature provides evidence suggesting a wider set of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to gather all relevant literature reporting features of VBI pertaining to atherosclerosis, with the aim to help provide evidence that may guide clinical practice in the use of manual therapy interventions and to raise awareness of the manifestations that VBI may present.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases were searched from inception to September 2024 (Allied and Alternative Medicine Database [AMED], AgeLine, SPORTDiscus, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online [MEDLINE], Cochrane, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL Plus). Articles were screened in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, The included articles required a diagnosis of VBI through clinical examination with radiological evidence of atherosclerotic lesions, without evidence of existing or previous neurological infarcts, concomitant arterial pathology, or any other form of pathological mechanism. Primary data were extracted utilizing a template, and the methodological quality was assessed utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Findings were summarized utilizing a narrative synthesis and a table of descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and eighty-three papers were identified, and 15 were included (93 cases, 50M/43F, age 64 years old ± 9 standard deviation [SD] yrs). Vertigo was the most common reported symptom, within a total of 37 different symptoms reported either in isolation or combination. Symptoms inclusive to Coman's 5D's accounted for 22 % of reported features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vertigo is the most common symptom (27.7 %) of VBI induced by atherosclerosis. However, there is not sufficient data to make concrete conclusions, although results do instill doubt over the sole use of Coman's 5D's in clinical practice. Prospective observational studies with standardized data extraction for VBI symptoms and their pattern of behavior are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"519-532"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143732070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of a community care coordination team to reduce emergency department utilization and hospital readmissions for the highest utilizers. 使用社区护理协调小组,以减少急诊科的使用率和最高使用率的医院再入院率。
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0255
Stacia Shipman, Kelly Painter, Lindsey Claire Epperson, Keri Smith

Context: A small percentage of patients comprise a high proportion of healthcare utilization, particularly the costs associated with Emergency Department (ED) visits and inpatient hospitalization readmissions.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a decrease in ED utilization and hospital readmissions in a selected group of super-utilizers post-intervention by a Community Care Coordination (CCC) team and to determine cost avoidance.

Methods: This was a retrospective chart analysis of selected super-utilizers enrolled in our CCC program. Each patient served as their own historical control to compare utilization rates, and a cost-benefit analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 368 patients participated in the CCC program during the specified time period. We found a significant reduction in ED visits and hospital admissions post-enrollment. The cost-benefit analysis showed an overall cost avoidance of $2,508,899.40, which is a 46 % cost reduction.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a reduction in healthcare utilization and provides critical information to fix the significant, national burden that ED super-utilizers impose on the healthcare system. This program aligns well with the osteopathic principles of the whole-person approach, emphasizing prevention and wellness and prioritizing dignity in healthcare.

背景:一小部分患者占医疗保健利用的高比例,特别是与急诊科(ED)访问和住院患者再入院相关的费用。目的:本研究的目的是证明在社区护理协调(CCC)团队干预后,在一组选择的超使用者中,ED使用率和医院再入院率的降低,并确定成本规避。方法:回顾性分析入选CCC项目的超利用率患者。每个患者作为自己的历史对照来比较使用率,并进行成本效益分析。结果:共有368例患者在规定时间内参加了CCC项目。我们发现入组后急诊科就诊和住院率显著降低。成本效益分析显示,总成本减少$2,508,899.40,即成本减少46% %。结论:我们的研究证明了医疗保健利用率的降低,并提供了关键信息,以解决急诊科过度利用率对医疗保健系统造成的重大国家负担。该计划与整骨疗法的全人方法原则相一致,强调预防和健康,优先考虑医疗保健中的尊严。
{"title":"Use of a community care coordination team to reduce emergency department utilization and hospital readmissions for the highest utilizers.","authors":"Stacia Shipman, Kelly Painter, Lindsey Claire Epperson, Keri Smith","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0255","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>A small percentage of patients comprise a high proportion of healthcare utilization, particularly the costs associated with Emergency Department (ED) visits and inpatient hospitalization readmissions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a decrease in ED utilization and hospital readmissions in a selected group of super-utilizers post-intervention by a Community Care Coordination (CCC) team and to determine cost avoidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart analysis of selected super-utilizers enrolled in our CCC program. Each patient served as their own historical control to compare utilization rates, and a cost-benefit analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 368 patients participated in the CCC program during the specified time period. We found a significant reduction in ED visits and hospital admissions post-enrollment. The cost-benefit analysis showed an overall cost avoidance of $2,508,899.40, which is a 46 % cost reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates a reduction in healthcare utilization and provides critical information to fix the significant, national burden that ED super-utilizers impose on the healthcare system. This program aligns well with the osteopathic principles of the whole-person approach, emphasizing prevention and wellness and prioritizing dignity in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"457-463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143671108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DO (under) representation in US guideline development: an investigation of guideline authors from 2021-2023. DO在美国指南制定中的代表:2021-2023年指南作者的调查。
IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0187
Alfred B Amendolara, Steven Salazar, Tiffany Nguyen, Porter Fife, Blake Harris, Alessandra M Rivera, Kennedy Madrid, Yvannia Gray, Stephen Stacey

Context: Research and scholarship are core drivers of medicine in the modern era. Evidence-based practice continues to replace expert opinion and long-held practice beliefs. Involvement in the development and writing of these guidelines is critical for Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) to maintain a seat at the academic table. According to the American Osteopathic Association (AOA), 11 % of practicing physicians in the US are DOs. This number is growing, as nearly 25 % of current medical students attend an osteopathic medical school. Without involvement in guideline development, DOs risk giving up control of their own practice of medicine.

Objectives: To quantify the contribution of DOs to the body of literature guiding practice, author information was extracted from all US-based guidelines published in the years 2021, 2022, and 2023 listed in the Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI) Guidelines Trust database.

Methods: Authors of US-based guidelines listed in the ECRI Trust database from the years 2021-2023 were counted and categorized into one of three groups based on terminal degree: MD holders, DO holders, and Other-degree holders. Authors whose degrees could not be identified were counted as "Unidentifiable." Additional data including sponsoring organization, organization type, and specialty were collected.

Results: A total of 674 guidelines were published by US organizations in 2021, 2022, and 2023, with 604 reporting author information. A total of 9,376 authors were counted. Of that, 7,253 held an MD (77 %), 110 held a DO (1.2 %), and 1,848 held another terminal degree (19.7 %); meanwhile, 1.66 % of counted authors did not have an identifiable degree. A total of 604 guidelines published by US organizations were identified. Of these, 88 (14.6 %) contained at least one DO author in their author list. Sixty-two unique specialties were identified, along with 130 unique sponsoring organizations. Of those specialties, 28 (44.4 %) had at least one DO author of at least one guideline. Of 130 sponsoring organizations, 44 (33.8 %) developed at least one guideline with at least one DO author. No osteopathic sponsoring organizations were identified.

Conclusions: Based on these results, we conclude that DOs are underrepresented in the development of guidelines.

背景:研究和学术是现代医学的核心驱动力。循证实践继续取代专家意见和长期持有的实践信念。参与这些指南的制定和编写对于骨科医生(DOs)在学术桌上保持一席之地至关重要。根据美国骨科协会(AOA), 11. %的执业医生在美国是DOs。这个数字还在增长,因为近25% %的医科学生就读于整骨疗法医学院。如果不参与指南的制定,DOs就有可能放弃对自己医学实践的控制。目的:为了量化DOs对文献指导实践的贡献,从急诊护理研究所(ECRI)指南信托数据库中列出的2021年、2022年和2023年出版的所有美国指南中提取作者信息。方法:对ECRI Trust数据库中列出的2021-2023年美国指南的作者进行统计,并根据最终学位分为三组:MD持有人、DO持有人和其他学位持有人。学位无法确定的作者被视为“身份不明”。收集了其他数据,包括赞助组织、组织类型和专业。结果:美国机构在2021年、2022年和2023年共发布了674份指南,其中604份报告了作者信息。共有9376位作者被统计。其中,7253人拥有博士学位(77 %),110人拥有博士学位(1.2 %),还有1848人拥有其他终极学位(19.7 %)。同时,1.66 %的统计作者没有可识别的学位。共确定了604份由美国组织发布的指南。其中,88篇(14.6 %)的作者列表中至少包含一名DO作者。确定了62个独特的专业,以及130个独特的赞助组织。在这些专业中,28个(44.4% %)至少有一个DO作者至少有一个指南。在130个赞助组织中,44个(33.8 %)与至少一个DO作者制定了至少一个指南。未发现骨科赞助组织。结论:基于这些结果,我们得出结论,DOs在指南制定中的代表性不足。
{"title":"DO (under) representation in US guideline development: an investigation of guideline authors from 2021-2023.","authors":"Alfred B Amendolara, Steven Salazar, Tiffany Nguyen, Porter Fife, Blake Harris, Alessandra M Rivera, Kennedy Madrid, Yvannia Gray, Stephen Stacey","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0187","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Research and scholarship are core drivers of medicine in the modern era. Evidence-based practice continues to replace expert opinion and long-held practice beliefs. Involvement in the development and writing of these guidelines is critical for Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) to maintain a seat at the academic table. According to the American Osteopathic Association (AOA), 11 % of practicing physicians in the US are DOs. This number is growing, as nearly 25 % of current medical students attend an osteopathic medical school. Without involvement in guideline development, DOs risk giving up control of their own practice of medicine.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify the contribution of DOs to the body of literature guiding practice, author information was extracted from all US-based guidelines published in the years 2021, 2022, and 2023 listed in the Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI) Guidelines Trust database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors of US-based guidelines listed in the ECRI Trust database from the years 2021-2023 were counted and categorized into one of three groups based on terminal degree: MD holders, DO holders, and Other-degree holders. Authors whose degrees could not be identified were counted as \"Unidentifiable.\" Additional data including sponsoring organization, organization type, and specialty were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 674 guidelines were published by US organizations in 2021, 2022, and 2023, with 604 reporting author information. A total of 9,376 authors were counted. Of that, 7,253 held an MD (77 %), 110 held a DO (1.2 %), and 1,848 held another terminal degree (19.7 %); meanwhile, 1.66 % of counted authors did not have an identifiable degree. A total of 604 guidelines published by US organizations were identified. Of these, 88 (14.6 %) contained at least one DO author in their author list. Sixty-two unique specialties were identified, along with 130 unique sponsoring organizations. Of those specialties, 28 (44.4 %) had at least one DO author of at least one guideline. Of 130 sponsoring organizations, 44 (33.8 %) developed at least one guideline with at least one DO author. No osteopathic sponsoring organizations were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these results, we conclude that DOs are underrepresented in the development of guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"435-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143651222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1