首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Osteopathic Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Why do physicians practice osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)? A survey study. 医生为什么要进行整骨疗法(OMT)?一项调查研究。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0288
Samantha M Lease, Jose S Figueroa Casanova

Context: Few osteopathic physicians (Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine [DOs]) utilize osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in their clinical practice, although all DOs are trained to do so. The reasons why many do not utilize OMT are not entirely clear. Anecdotally, these authors have observed that if a physician utilizes OMT, it is because they witnessed the efficacy for themselves in real-life clinical diagnoses found on patients or volunteers. This study seeks to explore this phenomenon.

Objectives: This study seeks to explore the relationship between witnessing the efficacy of OMT and the future use of OMT in clinical practice.

Methods: Surveys were sent to DOs who work with Des Moines University's College of Osteopathic Medicine (COM) clinical students as well as osteopathic medical students enrolled at the Des Moines University's COM. Survey data were analyzed by separating physicians into cohorts based on their use of OMT and students into cohorts based on their interest in utilizing OMT in future practice.

Results: DOs who practice OMT reported at least one, and often multiple, instances of witnessing the efficacy of OMT on real-life patients or volunteers while in their first 2 years of medical school. Those who do not utilize OMT reported few opportunities to witness the efficacy of OMT on a real-life patient. For physicians, 96.1 % of those who utilize OMT in their practice had the opportunity to see it work positively during the first 2 years of medical school, whereas only 7.4 % who do not utilize OMT had the opportunity. These findings are mirrored in the experience of current osteopathic medical students who are interested and uninterested in utilizing OMT in their future practice.

Conclusions: These findings emphasize the importance of exposing our medical students to some type of 'real-life' experience early in their careers; the data show that these experiences can be very beneficial in expanding the interest in utilizing osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in future practice. COMs can consider the implementation of programs that provide this experience to students, including extracurricular activities dedicated to the use of OMT.

背景:尽管所有骨科医师都接受过骨科手法治疗培训,但很少有骨科医师(骨科医师)在临床实践中使用骨科手法治疗。许多人不使用整骨疗法的原因并不完全清楚。根据这些作者的轶事观察,如果医生使用 OMT,那是因为他们在患者或志愿者的实际临床诊断中亲眼目睹了其疗效。本研究旨在探讨这一现象:本研究旨在探讨亲眼目睹 OMT 的疗效与今后在临床实践中使用 OMT 之间的关系:向与得梅因大学骨科医学院(COM)临床学生合作的医生以及在得梅因大学骨科医学院就读的骨科医学生发送了调查问卷。调查数据的分析方法是,根据医生使用骨科治疗法的情况将他们分成不同的组别,根据学生在未来实践中使用骨科治疗法的兴趣将他们分成不同的组别:结果:从事 OMT 的执业医师报告说,在他们就读医学院的头两年里,至少有一次(通常是多次)目睹了 OMT 对真实病人或志愿者的疗效。没有使用 OMT 的医生则表示很少有机会亲眼目睹 OMT 在真实病人身上的疗效。就医生而言,96.1% 在实践中使用 OMT 的医生在医学院的头两年有机会看到 OMT 发挥积极作用,而不使用 OMT 的医生只有 7.4% 有机会看到。这些发现也反映在目前骨科医学生的经历中,他们对在未来的实践中使用 OMT 感兴趣和不感兴趣:这些发现强调了让医学生在其职业生涯早期接触某种类型的 "真实生活 "体验的重要性;数据显示,这些体验对于提高他们在未来实践中使用整骨疗法(OMM)的兴趣非常有益。骨科医师协会可以考虑实施一些计划,为学生提供这种体验,包括开展专门使用整骨疗法的课外活动。
{"title":"Why do physicians practice osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)? A survey study.","authors":"Samantha M Lease, Jose S Figueroa Casanova","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0288","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0288","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Few osteopathic physicians (Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine [DOs]) utilize osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in their clinical practice, although all DOs are trained to do so. The reasons why many do not utilize OMT are not entirely clear. Anecdotally, these authors have observed that if a physician utilizes OMT, it is because they witnessed the efficacy for themselves in real-life clinical diagnoses found on patients or volunteers. This study seeks to explore this phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study seeks to explore the relationship between witnessing the efficacy of OMT and the future use of OMT in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were sent to DOs who work with Des Moines University's College of Osteopathic Medicine (COM) clinical students as well as osteopathic medical students enrolled at the Des Moines University's COM. Survey data were analyzed by separating physicians into cohorts based on their use of OMT and students into cohorts based on their interest in utilizing OMT in future practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DOs who practice OMT reported at least one, and often multiple, instances of witnessing the efficacy of OMT on real-life patients or volunteers while in their first 2 years of medical school. Those who do not utilize OMT reported few opportunities to witness the efficacy of OMT on a real-life patient. For physicians, 96.1 % of those who utilize OMT in their practice had the opportunity to see it work positively during the first 2 years of medical school, whereas only 7.4 % who do not utilize OMT had the opportunity. These findings are mirrored in the experience of current osteopathic medical students who are interested and uninterested in utilizing OMT in their future practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings emphasize the importance of exposing our medical students to some type of 'real-life' experience early in their careers; the data show that these experiences can be very beneficial in expanding the interest in utilizing osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in future practice. COMs can consider the implementation of programs that provide this experience to students, including extracurricular activities dedicated to the use of OMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing cranial suture interdigitation in humans and non-human primates: unearthing links to osteopathic cranial concept. 比较人类与非人灵长类动物的颅缝交接:发掘与骨科头颅概念的联系。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0243
Janice Blumer, Irisa Arney, Anna Hardin, Morgan Nichols, Luke Arsenault, John Petrucci

Context: Since William Garner Sutherland's inception of osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine (OCMM), osteopathic physicians have practiced with the knowledge that cranial sutures exhibit motion. We hypothesize that the complexity of suture interdigitation in humans may provide clues to elucidate the concept of OCMM.

Objectives: We compared the interdigitation of sagittal, coronal (left and right), and lambdoid (left and right) sutures in computed tomography (CT) scans of humans and five nonhuman primate species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Hylobates lar, and Nasalis larvatus).

Methods: Human ages are evenly distributed between 10 and 65 years of age, with an equal number of males (n=16) and females (n=16) in the sample. Nonhuman primates are all females, and the sample includes juveniles (n=6) and adults (n=34). Sutures were evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0: fused sutures; 1: no interdigitation; 2: low complexity; and 3: representing the highest degree of interdigitation and complexity).

Results: Based on ordinary least squares linear regression, we found no significant relationship between suture interdigitation and age in humans. Chi-square tests were utilized to assess sex differences within humans, species-level differences, and differences between humans and nonhuman primates across all five sutures. Humans exhibited a statistically significant greater degree of suture complexity than all five nonhuman species across all five sutures.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that human suture interdigitation is more complex than their closest living relatives (African apes) and other primates (Asian monkeys and apes). We theorize that this would enable subtle movement and serve to transmit forces at the cranial sutures from dietary or ethological behaviors, similar to the pattern observed in other mammals. While humans have a softer diet compared to other living primates, the uniqueness of human craniofacial growth and extended developmental period could contribute to the necessity for complex cranial sutures. More studies are needed to understand variation in human and nonhuman sutural complexity and its relationship to cranial motion.

背景:自威廉-加纳-萨瑟兰(William Garner Sutherland)提出颅骨整骨疗法(OCMM)以来,整骨疗法医生一直以颅骨缝线表现出运动的知识为基础行医。我们假设,人类缝线相互咬合的复杂性可能为阐明 OCMM 的概念提供线索:我们比较了人类和五种非人灵长类动物(大猩猩、庞戈侏儒、潘氏灵长类、Hylobates lar 和 Nasalis larvatus)的计算机断层扫描(CT)中矢状缝、冠状缝(左侧和右侧)和蝶状缝(左侧和右侧)的相互咬合情况。方法:人类的年龄均匀分布在 10 岁到 65 岁之间,样本中男性(n=16)和女性(n=16)的数量相等。非人灵长类动物均为雌性,样本中包括幼年(n=6)和成年(n=34)。缝合线的评估范围从 0 到 3(0:融合缝合线;1:无相互咬合;2:低复杂度;3:代表最高程度的相互咬合和复杂度):结果:根据普通最小二乘法线性回归,我们发现缝线相互咬合与人类年龄之间没有显著关系。我们利用卡方检验评估了人类内部的性别差异、物种间的差异以及人类与非人灵长类动物在所有五条缝上的差异。在所有五条缝线上,人类比所有五种非人类灵长类动物的缝线复杂程度都要高,这在统计学上具有显著意义:这些研究结果表明,人类的缝合相互结合比其近亲(非洲猿)和其他灵长类动物(亚洲猴和猿)更为复杂。我们推测,这将使人类能够进行微妙的运动,并在颅缝处传递来自饮食或伦理行为的力量,这与在其他哺乳动物身上观察到的模式类似。虽然与其他灵长类动物相比,人类的饮食较为松软,但人类颅面部生长的独特性和发育期的延长可能会导致复杂颅缝的必要性。要了解人类和非人类颅缝复杂性的变化及其与颅骨运动的关系,还需要进行更多的研究。
{"title":"Comparing cranial suture interdigitation in humans and non-human primates: unearthing links to osteopathic cranial concept.","authors":"Janice Blumer, Irisa Arney, Anna Hardin, Morgan Nichols, Luke Arsenault, John Petrucci","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Since William Garner Sutherland's inception of osteopathic cranial manipulative medicine (OCMM), osteopathic physicians have practiced with the knowledge that cranial sutures exhibit motion. We hypothesize that the complexity of suture interdigitation in humans may provide clues to elucidate the concept of OCMM.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the interdigitation of sagittal, coronal (left and right), and lambdoid (left and right) sutures in computed tomography (CT) scans of humans and five nonhuman primate species (<i>Gorilla gorilla</i>, <i>Pongo pygmaeus</i>, <i>Pan troglodytes</i>, <i>Hylobates lar</i>, and <i>Nasalis larvatus</i>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human ages are evenly distributed between 10 and 65 years of age, with an equal number of males (n=16) and females (n=16) in the sample. Nonhuman primates are all females, and the sample includes juveniles (n=6) and adults (n=34). Sutures were evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0: fused sutures; 1: no interdigitation; 2: low complexity; and 3: representing the highest degree of interdigitation and complexity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on ordinary least squares linear regression, we found no significant relationship between suture interdigitation and age in humans. Chi-square tests were utilized to assess sex differences within humans, species-level differences, and differences between humans and nonhuman primates across all five sutures. Humans exhibited a statistically significant greater degree of suture complexity than all five nonhuman species across all five sutures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that human suture interdigitation is more complex than their closest living relatives (African apes) and other primates (Asian monkeys and apes). We theorize that this would enable subtle movement and serve to transmit forces at the cranial sutures from dietary or ethological behaviors, similar to the pattern observed in other mammals. While humans have a softer diet compared to other living primates, the uniqueness of human craniofacial growth and extended developmental period could contribute to the necessity for complex cranial sutures. More studies are needed to understand variation in human and nonhuman sutural complexity and its relationship to cranial motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protecting the profession: lessons from the recent physician scandals. 保护职业:从最近的医生丑闻中汲取教训。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0127
R Andrew Kelso, Deborah Schmidt, Celia McLay

Sexual abuse scandals in recent years have eroded some of the trust that is foundational for the physician-patient relationship. A closer analysis of some of these stories of abuse from the standpoint of medical professionalism, primarily utilizing the example of Larry Nassar, DO, yields potential ways in which instances of abuse may be reduced or eliminated. The goal of this paper is to elicit lessons that can be learned from these tragic sequences of events so that physicians, healthcare institutions, physician practices, medical boards, and even patients themselves can introduce measures that help prevent future stories like these.

近年来发生的性虐待丑闻侵蚀了一些作为医患关系基础的信任。从医疗职业精神的角度,主要以拉里-纳萨尔(Larry Nassar, DO)为例,对其中一些虐待事件进行仔细分析,可以发现减少或消除虐待事件的潜在方法。本文的目的是从这些悲剧性事件中汲取教训,以便医生、医疗机构、医生执业、医疗委员会,甚至患者本身都能采取措施,防止类似事件再次发生。
{"title":"Protecting the profession: lessons from the recent physician scandals.","authors":"R Andrew Kelso, Deborah Schmidt, Celia McLay","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0127","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual abuse scandals in recent years have eroded some of the trust that is foundational for the physician-patient relationship. A closer analysis of some of these stories of abuse from the standpoint of medical professionalism, primarily utilizing the example of Larry Nassar, DO, yields potential ways in which instances of abuse may be reduced or eliminated. The goal of this paper is to elicit lessons that can be learned from these tragic sequences of events so that physicians, healthcare institutions, physician practices, medical boards, and even patients themselves can introduce measures that help prevent future stories like these.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142112970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of self-reported confidence in independent prescribing among osteopathic medical graduating seniors. 分析骨科医学专业即将毕业的大四学生对独立开处方的自述信心。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2022-0187
Khalil Eldeeb
<p><strong>Context: </strong>Prescribing medications is one of the physicians' most important professional activities throughout their careers. Lack of confidence and competency to prescribe may lead to preventable medical errors. The prevalence of prescription errors among new graduate physicians has been widely studied. Studies have linked this to inadequate foundational pharmacology education and work environment, among other factors. Suggestions were made for different educational interventions to increase the physicians' confidence and competency in prescribing to reduce the risk of medical errors. However, many of these studies were about students or graduates of medical schools other than osteopathic medical schools.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study analyzed the self-reported confidence of graduating seniors in the United States osteopathic medical schools in their current ability to prescribe safely and independently and the possible associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed secondary data on the graduating seniors' surveys published by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) from the 2012/2013 to 2020/2021 academic years. Data were analyzed utilizing SPSS version 26.0 and MedCalc version 22.009, and statistical inferences were considered significant whenever p≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The aggregated data show that 38,712 Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) seniors responded to the AACOM survey, representing 72.1 % of expected graduates during the study period. Most of the DO graduating seniors (70.8 %) reported feeling confident in their current abilities to independently write safe and indicated orders and to prescribe therapies or interventions in various settings. The percentage of respondents who perceived the time devoted to clinical pharmacology instruction as appropriate increased systematically over these reported years. A positive correlation was found between the percentage of students who reported the time dedicated to clinical pharmacology as excessive and the percentage of students who reported being confident in prescribing. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of students who agreed that the first two years of medical school were well organized and the percentage of students who reported being confident in prescribing. A statistically significant correlation was found between the percentage of students who agreed with statements about frequent interactions with the attendee, testing at the end of each rotation, and being prepared for Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation (COMLEX Level 2-CE) during the required clerkships and the percentage of students who reported being confident in independent prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During this study period, most osteopathic medical graduating seniors (70.8 %) felt confident about their cu
背景:开处方是医生职业生涯中最重要的专业活动之一。缺乏开处方的信心和能力可能会导致可预防的医疗失误。新毕业的医生中处方错误的发生率已被广泛研究。研究表明,这与基础药理学教育不足和工作环境等因素有关。有人建议采取不同的教育干预措施,以增强医生开处方的信心和能力,从而降低医疗差错的风险。然而,这些研究大多针对骨科医学院以外的医学院学生或毕业生:本研究分析了美国骨科医学院即将毕业的大四学生自我报告的对目前安全、独立开处方能力的信心以及可能的相关因素:本研究分析了美国骨科医学院协会(AACOM)发布的2012/2013至2020/2021学年大四毕业生调查的二手数据。数据采用SPSS 26.0版和MedCalc 22.009版进行分析,统计推论以P≤0.05为显著:汇总数据显示,有38712名骨科医学(DO)博士毕业生回复了AACOM调查,占研究期间预计毕业生的72.1%。大多数即将毕业的骨科医生(70.8%)表示,他们对自己目前的能力很有信心,能够独立撰写安全且有针对性的医嘱,并在各种情况下开具治疗或干预处方。在这些报告年份中,认为临床药理学教学时间适当的受访者比例有系统地增加。认为临床药理学教学时间过长的学生比例与对处方有信心的学生比例之间存在正相关。认为医学院前两年学习安排合理的学生比例与对处方有信心的学生比例之间存在统计学意义上的正相关。在统计学上发现,同意与听课者频繁互动、在每次轮转结束时进行测试以及在规定的实习期间为综合骨科医学执业资格考试二级认知评估(COMLEX Level 2-CE)做好准备等说法的学生比例与表示对独立开处方有信心的学生比例之间存在明显的相关性:在本研究期间,大多数骨科医学专业的高年级毕业生(70.8%)对自己目前的处方能力有信心,而其他学生则没有,这可能会增加发生可预防的医疗事故的风险。如果能在前两年加强组织,增加临床药理学教育的时间,并在临床教育的必修实习中开发更多的互动课程,就能增强处方信心。
{"title":"Analysis of self-reported confidence in independent prescribing among osteopathic medical graduating seniors.","authors":"Khalil Eldeeb","doi":"10.1515/jom-2022-0187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2022-0187","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Context: &lt;/strong&gt;Prescribing medications is one of the physicians' most important professional activities throughout their careers. Lack of confidence and competency to prescribe may lead to preventable medical errors. The prevalence of prescription errors among new graduate physicians has been widely studied. Studies have linked this to inadequate foundational pharmacology education and work environment, among other factors. Suggestions were made for different educational interventions to increase the physicians' confidence and competency in prescribing to reduce the risk of medical errors. However, many of these studies were about students or graduates of medical schools other than osteopathic medical schools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;This study analyzed the self-reported confidence of graduating seniors in the United States osteopathic medical schools in their current ability to prescribe safely and independently and the possible associated factors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This study analyzed secondary data on the graduating seniors' surveys published by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) from the 2012/2013 to 2020/2021 academic years. Data were analyzed utilizing SPSS version 26.0 and MedCalc version 22.009, and statistical inferences were considered significant whenever p≤0.05.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The aggregated data show that 38,712 Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) seniors responded to the AACOM survey, representing 72.1 % of expected graduates during the study period. Most of the DO graduating seniors (70.8 %) reported feeling confident in their current abilities to independently write safe and indicated orders and to prescribe therapies or interventions in various settings. The percentage of respondents who perceived the time devoted to clinical pharmacology instruction as appropriate increased systematically over these reported years. A positive correlation was found between the percentage of students who reported the time dedicated to clinical pharmacology as excessive and the percentage of students who reported being confident in prescribing. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of students who agreed that the first two years of medical school were well organized and the percentage of students who reported being confident in prescribing. A statistically significant correlation was found between the percentage of students who agreed with statements about frequent interactions with the attendee, testing at the end of each rotation, and being prepared for Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation (COMLEX Level 2-CE) during the required clerkships and the percentage of students who reported being confident in independent prescribing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;During this study period, most osteopathic medical graduating seniors (70.8 %) felt confident about their cu","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Foot and ankle fellowship-trained osteopathic orthopaedic surgeons: a review, analysis, and understanding of current trends. 足踝研究员培训的骨科矫形外科医生:回顾、分析和了解当前趋势。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0092
James P Henry, Matthew J Partan, Katharine M Chen, Randy M Cohn, Adam D Bitterman

Context: Over the past several decades, orthopedic surgery has seen a substantial increase in the number of surgeons completing fellowship training. Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) continue to advance their orthopedic education through subspecialty fellowship training. DOs have represented between approximately 6 % and 15 % of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) fellows. Although historical representation has been considered strong, the fellowship match years 2020 and 2021 have seen a decline in osteopathic orthopedic surgeons participating in foot and ankle fellowships. This deviates from the recent trends of increasing participation across orthopedic subspecialities.

Objectives: To investigate and review the trends of orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship training.

Methods: Data was reviewed from the AOFAS regarding number of fellows matched and degree obtained. Data from the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) were reviewed for physician trends and match statistics.

Results: Fellowship match years 2020 and 2021 have seen a decline in osteopathic orthopedic surgeons participating in foot and ankle fellowships, with only roughly 3% of AOFAS fellows being osteopathic trained.

Conclusions: Orthopedic surgery has the highest rate of subspecialty training of all surgical specialties. Although there is hope for an increasing osteopathic presence in orthopedic surgery, recent literature has pointed to potential for continued bias in opportunities for osteopathic students. We hope that increased participation of osteopathic graduates in orthopedic surgery training programs will result in the continued expansion of osteopathic orthopedic surgeons completing fellowship training, including in foot and ankle surgery.

背景:在过去的几十年中,完成研究金培训的外科医生人数大幅增加。骨科医生(DOs)继续通过亚专科研究金培训来提高他们的骨科教育水平。在美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)的研究员中,骨科医生约占 6% 到 15%。虽然历史上的代表性一直被认为很强,但在 2020 年和 2021 年的研究金配对年,参加足踝研究金的骨科矫形外科医生人数有所下降。这与近期骨科各亚专科参与人数不断增加的趋势背道而驰:调查并回顾骨科足踝研究员培训的趋势:方法:对美国足踝骨科医师资格认证系统(AOFAS)提供的数据进行审查,了解符合条件的研究员人数和获得的学位。对来自州医学委员会联合会(FSMB)、美国足踝矫形学会(AOFAS)和美国医学院协会(AAMC)的数据进行了审查,以了解医生趋势和匹配统计数据:2020年和2021年的研究员配对年,骨科骨科医生参与足踝研究的人数有所下降,只有大约3%的AOFAS研究员接受过骨科培训:结论:在所有外科专科中,骨外科的亚专科培训率最高。虽然骨科医师在骨科手术中的人数有望增加,但最近的文献指出,骨科医师学生的机会可能仍然存在偏差。我们希望,骨科毕业生更多地参与骨科手术培训项目,从而不断扩大骨科骨科医生完成研究金培训的人数,包括足踝外科。
{"title":"Foot and ankle fellowship-trained osteopathic orthopaedic surgeons: a review, analysis, and understanding of current trends.","authors":"James P Henry, Matthew J Partan, Katharine M Chen, Randy M Cohn, Adam D Bitterman","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Over the past several decades, orthopedic surgery has seen a substantial increase in the number of surgeons completing fellowship training. Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) continue to advance their orthopedic education through subspecialty fellowship training. DOs have represented between approximately 6 % and 15 % of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) fellows. Although historical representation has been considered strong, the fellowship match years 2020 and 2021 have seen a decline in osteopathic orthopedic surgeons participating in foot and ankle fellowships. This deviates from the recent trends of increasing participation across orthopedic subspecialities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate and review the trends of orthopedic foot and ankle fellowship training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was reviewed from the AOFAS regarding number of fellows matched and degree obtained. Data from the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) were reviewed for physician trends and match statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fellowship match years 2020 and 2021 have seen a decline in osteopathic orthopedic surgeons participating in foot and ankle fellowships, with only roughly 3% of AOFAS fellows being osteopathic trained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Orthopedic surgery has the highest rate of subspecialty training of all surgical specialties. Although there is hope for an increasing osteopathic presence in orthopedic surgery, recent literature has pointed to potential for continued bias in opportunities for osteopathic students. We hope that increased participation of osteopathic graduates in orthopedic surgery training programs will result in the continued expansion of osteopathic orthopedic surgeons completing fellowship training, including in foot and ankle surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141976839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alcohol consumption among older adults in the United States amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the 2017-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 美国老年人在 COVID-19 大流行中的饮酒情况:对 2017-2021 年行为风险因素监测系统的分析。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0054
Macy Haight, Parker Smith, Natasha Bray, Douglas Nolan, Micah Hartwell

Context: Alcohol consumption is responsible for numerous life-threatening diseases, including liver cirrhosis, heart disease, and various cancers. During the pandemic, alcohol-related deaths increased from 2019 to 2021, topping out at approximately 108,000 deaths related to alcohol. This trend also introduced the question whether heavy alcohol consumption and binge drinking increased during the pandemic, particularly in those 65 and older.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine whether heavy alcohol consumption and binge drinking increased during the pandemic in older adults in the United States.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to determine whether rates of overall alcohol consumption, heavy consumption, or binge drinking deviated from 2017 through 2021. We utilized chi-square tests to determine changes in rates over the included years.

Results: Our findings show that the overall rate of alcohol use in populations 65 and older from 2017 through 2021 was approximately 42.1 %, which peaked in 2017 at 43.7 % and declined each year, resulting in the lowest rate (41.3 %) in 2021 (χ 2 =8.96, p<0.0001). Binge and heavy drinking rates were 5.1 % and 4.2 % overall during this time frame, respectively, and the annual changes were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: The impact of COVID-19 on the drinking behavior of older US adults was minimal in terms of binge or heavy drinking, although the overall rates of alcohol consumption among this group declined. Reports among other US age groups showed increased consumption and deaths from alcohol use. Future research is needed to determine the causes for the overall decrease in consumption or adaptive measures that this group may have taken, which led to minimal changes in binge or heavy drinking in contrast to younger populations.

背景:饮酒是许多危及生命的疾病的元凶,包括肝硬化、心脏病和各种癌症。在大流行期间,与酒精相关的死亡人数从 2019 年到 2021 年有所增加,最高时约有 108,000 人死于酒精。这一趋势也带来了一个问题,即在大流行期间,大量饮酒和酗酒是否会增加,特别是在 65 岁及以上的人群中:本研究旨在确定大流行期间美国老年人的大量饮酒和酗酒是否有所增加:我们对行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)进行了横截面分析,以确定总体饮酒率、大量饮酒率或酗酒率在 2017 年至 2021 年期间是否有所偏离。我们利用卡方检验来确定所包括年份的比率变化:我们的研究结果表明,从 2017 年到 2021 年,65 岁及以上人群的总体饮酒率约为 42.1%,2017 年达到峰值 43.7%,之后逐年下降,2021 年的饮酒率最低(41.3%)(χ 2 =8.96,p结论:就暴饮或大量饮酒而言,COVID-19 对美国老年人饮酒行为的影响微乎其微,尽管该群体的总体饮酒率有所下降。美国其他年龄组的报告显示,饮酒导致的消费和死亡人数有所增加。今后需要开展研究,以确定饮酒量总体下降的原因,或这一群体可能采取的适应措施,这些措施导致酗酒或大量饮酒的情况与年轻人群相比变化甚微。
{"title":"Alcohol consumption among older adults in the United States amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the 2017-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.","authors":"Macy Haight, Parker Smith, Natasha Bray, Douglas Nolan, Micah Hartwell","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Alcohol consumption is responsible for numerous life-threatening diseases, including liver cirrhosis, heart disease, and various cancers. During the pandemic, alcohol-related deaths increased from 2019 to 2021, topping out at approximately 108,000 deaths related to alcohol. This trend also introduced the question whether heavy alcohol consumption and binge drinking increased during the pandemic, particularly in those 65 and older.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine whether heavy alcohol consumption and binge drinking increased during the pandemic in older adults in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to determine whether rates of overall alcohol consumption, heavy consumption, or binge drinking deviated from 2017 through 2021. We utilized chi-square tests to determine changes in rates over the included years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings show that the overall rate of alcohol use in populations 65 and older from 2017 through 2021 was approximately 42.1 %, which peaked in 2017 at 43.7 % and declined each year, resulting in the lowest rate (41.3 %) in 2021 (<i>χ</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> =8.96, p<0.0001). Binge and heavy drinking rates were 5.1 % and 4.2 % overall during this time frame, respectively, and the annual changes were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of COVID-19 on the drinking behavior of older US adults was minimal in terms of binge or heavy drinking, although the overall rates of alcohol consumption among this group declined. Reports among other US age groups showed increased consumption and deaths from alcohol use. Future research is needed to determine the causes for the overall decrease in consumption or adaptive measures that this group may have taken, which led to minimal changes in binge or heavy drinking in contrast to younger populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Educating our colleagues and hospital administrators regarding osteopathic medicine. 对我们的同事和医院管理者进行有关骨科医学的教育。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0160
Steven B Soliman
{"title":"Educating our colleagues and hospital administrators regarding osteopathic medicine.","authors":"Steven B Soliman","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0160","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive review of the heart failure management guidelines presented by the American College of Cardiology and the current supporting evidence. 全面回顾美国心脏病学会提出的心力衰竭管理指南以及当前的支持性证据。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0071
Lia Lazareva, Jay H Shubrook, Milind Dhond
<p><strong>Context: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that affects the heart's functional capacity, resulting in symptoms such as fatigue, edema, and dyspnea. It affects millions of adults in the United States and presents challenges in optimizing treatment and coordinating care among clinicians. Additionally, the various classifications for HF and limited research on treatment outcomes in heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) further complicate the pharmacological management of patients with this disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this article are to review the pharmacotherapy guidelines for HF provided by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and offer an update on the current trials conducted on these agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The paper includes a post hoc analysis of established randomized controlled trials (RCTs), current RCTs, analysis of HF registries, and the guidelines published by the ACC. The gathering of research began in June 2023 and completed in August 2023. PubMed was utilized with the following search items: "treatment for HFrEF" (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), "treatment for HFmrEF," and "treatment for HFpEF." The screening process was completed by one author. The automation tools utilized were "clinical trials," "randomized control trials," and "five years". Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and case reports were excluded from the screening process. This review does not include research regarding medical devices, interventional therapies, and lifestyle modifications. Finally, research regarding additional comorbidities, nonpharmacological focused research, and agents not recommended by the ACC are not included in this paper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search began with 6,561 records identified from PubMed, with 407 records screened after automation tools were utilized to filter for "clinical trials," "randomized control trials," "one year," and "five years". A total of 22 duplicates were reviewed, 318 were sought for screening after trials from 2019 were removed, and 31 studies were ultimately included in the review. A detailed summary of the most recent recommendations by the ACC are provided. The discussion includes indications, mechanisms of action, side effects, and contraindications for the selected agents. Additionally, recent clinical trials are included to provide evidence on the efficacy of the recommended classes of drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current guidelines for managing HFrEF have been consistent, but there is limited consensus on treating HFmrEF and HFpEF. Large RCTs have provided compelling evidence supporting the use of the recommended pharmacological agents. However, despite the new effective treatment protocols, slow clinical inertia and underoptimization of HF management persist. Thus, it is crucial to synchronize care among cli
背景:心力衰竭(HF)是一种影响心脏功能的慢性疾病,会导致疲劳、水肿和呼吸困难等症状。它影响着美国数百万成年人,给优化治疗和协调临床医生之间的护理带来了挑战。此外,心力衰竭的分类多种多样,对射血分数中等的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)治疗效果的研究也很有限,这使该病患者的药物治疗更加复杂:本文旨在回顾美国心脏病学会(ACC)提供的心力衰竭药物治疗指南,并提供当前对这些药物进行试验的最新情况:本文包括对已完成的随机对照试验 (RCT)、当前的 RCT、心房颤动登记分析以及 ACC 发布的指南进行的事后分析。研究收集工作于 2023 年 6 月开始,2023 年 8 月结束。在 PubMed 上使用了以下搜索项:"HFrEF治疗"(射血分数降低的心衰)、"HFmrEF治疗 "和 "HFpEF治疗"。筛选过程由一位作者完成。使用的自动化工具包括 "临床试验"、"随机对照试验 "和 "五年"。筛选过程中排除了荟萃分析、系统综述和病例报告。本综述不包括有关医疗器械、介入疗法和生活方式调整的研究。最后,本文还不包括有关其他合并症的研究、以非药物治疗为重点的研究以及未被美国癌症协会推荐的药物:搜索开始时从 PubMed 上找到了 6,561 条记录,在使用自动化工具过滤 "临床试验"、"随机对照试验"、"一年 "和 "五年 "后,筛选出 407 条记录。共审查了 22 项重复内容,在删除 2019 年的试验后,又寻找了 318 项进行筛选,最终有 31 项研究被纳入审查范围。本文提供了 ACC 最新建议的详细摘要。讨论内容包括所选药物的适应症、作用机制、副作用和禁忌症。此外,还包括最新的临床试验,为推荐药物的疗效提供证据:结论:目前治疗 HFrEF 的指南是一致的,但在治疗 HFmrEF 和 HFpEF 方面共识有限。大型 RCT 研究提供了令人信服的证据,支持使用推荐的药物。然而,尽管有了新的有效治疗方案,但缓慢的临床惰性和心房颤动管理的优化不足依然存在。因此,参与治疗该病患者的临床医生必须同步进行治疗。
{"title":"Comprehensive review of the heart failure management guidelines presented by the American College of Cardiology and the current supporting evidence.","authors":"Lia Lazareva, Jay H Shubrook, Milind Dhond","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0071","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Context: &lt;/strong&gt;Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that affects the heart's functional capacity, resulting in symptoms such as fatigue, edema, and dyspnea. It affects millions of adults in the United States and presents challenges in optimizing treatment and coordinating care among clinicians. Additionally, the various classifications for HF and limited research on treatment outcomes in heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) further complicate the pharmacological management of patients with this disease.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;The objectives of this article are to review the pharmacotherapy guidelines for HF provided by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and offer an update on the current trials conducted on these agents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The paper includes a post hoc analysis of established randomized controlled trials (RCTs), current RCTs, analysis of HF registries, and the guidelines published by the ACC. The gathering of research began in June 2023 and completed in August 2023. PubMed was utilized with the following search items: \"treatment for HFrEF\" (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), \"treatment for HFmrEF,\" and \"treatment for HFpEF.\" The screening process was completed by one author. The automation tools utilized were \"clinical trials,\" \"randomized control trials,\" and \"five years\". Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and case reports were excluded from the screening process. This review does not include research regarding medical devices, interventional therapies, and lifestyle modifications. Finally, research regarding additional comorbidities, nonpharmacological focused research, and agents not recommended by the ACC are not included in this paper.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The search began with 6,561 records identified from PubMed, with 407 records screened after automation tools were utilized to filter for \"clinical trials,\" \"randomized control trials,\" \"one year,\" and \"five years\". A total of 22 duplicates were reviewed, 318 were sought for screening after trials from 2019 were removed, and 31 studies were ultimately included in the review. A detailed summary of the most recent recommendations by the ACC are provided. The discussion includes indications, mechanisms of action, side effects, and contraindications for the selected agents. Additionally, recent clinical trials are included to provide evidence on the efficacy of the recommended classes of drugs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The current guidelines for managing HFrEF have been consistent, but there is limited consensus on treating HFmrEF and HFpEF. Large RCTs have provided compelling evidence supporting the use of the recommended pharmacological agents. However, despite the new effective treatment protocols, slow clinical inertia and underoptimization of HF management persist. Thus, it is crucial to synchronize care among cli","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141761446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The predictive validity of MCAT scores and undergraduate GPA for COMLEX-USA licensure exam performance of students enrolled in osteopathic medical schools. 骨科医学院学生的 MCAT 分数和本科 GPA 对 COMLEX-USA 执业资格考试成绩的预测有效性。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0265
Kenneth D Royal, Christian Meyer, Erik Guercio, Mark Speicher, Joseph Flamini, Jeanne M Sandella, Tsung-Hsun Tsai, Cynthia A Searcy

Context: Osteopathic (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO]) medical students account for more than 25 % of all medical students in the United States.

Objectives: This study examined the predictive validity of Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) total scores and cumulative undergraduate grade point averages (UGPAs) for performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States (COMLEX-USA) Level 1 and Level 2-CE (Cognitive Evaluation) licensure examinations administered by the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME). Additionally, the study examined the degree to which MCAT total scores and UGPAs provide comparable prediction of student performance by key sociodemographic variables.

Methods: This study involved a collaborative effort between the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) and the NBOME. Data were examined for 39 accredited DO-granting medical schools in the United States during the 2017 application cycle. Researchers utilized three regression models that included MCAT total scores, cumulative UGPA, and combined MCAT total scores and cumulative UGPA to determine predictive validity. Researchers also examined the comparability of prediction for sociodemographic variables by examining the differences between observed and predicted error for both scores and pass/fail success rates.

Results: Medium to large correlations were discernible between MCAT total scores, UGPA, and COMLEX-USA examination outcomes. For both COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores and pass/fail outcomes, MCAT scores alone provided superior predictive value to UGPA alone. However, MCAT scores and UGPA utilized in conjunction provided the best predictive value. When predicting both licensure examination scores and pass/fail outcomes by sociodemographic variables, all three models provided comparable predictive accuracy.

Conclusions: Findings from this comprehensive study of DO-granting medical schools provide evidence for the value-added benefit of taking MCAT scores and UGPA into consideration, particularly when these measures are utilized in conjunction. Further, findings provide evidence indicating that individuals from different sociodemographic backgrounds who enter medical school with similar MCAT scores and UGPA perform similarly on licensure examination outcome measures.

背景:在美国,骨科(骨科医学博士)医学生占医学生总数的 25% 以上:本研究探讨了医学院入学考试(MCAT)总分和本科生累积平均学分绩点(UGPA)对美国骨科医学考试委员会(NBOME)举办的美国骨科医学执照综合考试(COMLEX-USA)一级和二级-CE(认知评估)执照考试成绩的预测有效性。此外,该研究还考察了 MCAT 总分和 UGPA 在多大程度上可以通过关键的社会人口变量来预测学生的成绩:本研究由美国医学院协会(AAMC)、美国骨科医学院协会(AACOM)和美国国家医学考试委员会(NBOME)合作进行。在2017年申请周期内,研究人员对美国39所经认可的授予直博学位的医学院进行了数据调查。研究人员使用了三个回归模型,包括 MCAT 总分、累计 UGPA 以及 MCAT 总分和累计 UGPA 的组合,以确定预测有效性。研究人员还通过研究分数和及格/不及格成功率的观察误差与预测误差之间的差异,检验了社会人口变量预测的可比性:MCAT总分、UGPA和COMLEX-USA考试结果之间存在中到较大的相关性。对于 COMLEX-USA 1 级和 2 级-CE 分数以及及格/不及格结果,单凭 MCAT 分数的预测价值优于单凭 UGPA 的预测价值。然而,MCAT 分数和 UGPA 结合使用则具有最佳预测价值。在通过社会人口变量预测执业资格考试成绩和及格/不及格结果时,所有三个模型的预测准确性相当:这项对授予博士学位的医学院校进行的综合研究结果证明,将 MCAT 分数和 UGPA 考虑在内具有增值效益,尤其是当这些指标结合使用时。此外,研究结果还提供了证据,表明来自不同社会人口背景、以相似的 MCAT 分数和 UGPA 进入医学院的学生在执业资格考试结果测量中的表现相似。
{"title":"The predictive validity of MCAT scores and undergraduate GPA for COMLEX-USA licensure exam performance of students enrolled in osteopathic medical schools.","authors":"Kenneth D Royal, Christian Meyer, Erik Guercio, Mark Speicher, Joseph Flamini, Jeanne M Sandella, Tsung-Hsun Tsai, Cynthia A Searcy","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Osteopathic (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO]) medical students account for more than 25 % of all medical students in the United States.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the predictive validity of Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) total scores and cumulative undergraduate grade point averages (UGPAs) for performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States (COMLEX-USA) Level 1 and Level 2-CE (Cognitive Evaluation) licensure examinations administered by the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME). Additionally, the study examined the degree to which MCAT total scores and UGPAs provide comparable prediction of student performance by key sociodemographic variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved a collaborative effort between the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) and the NBOME. Data were examined for 39 accredited DO-granting medical schools in the United States during the 2017 application cycle. Researchers utilized three regression models that included MCAT total scores, cumulative UGPA, and combined MCAT total scores and cumulative UGPA to determine predictive validity. Researchers also examined the comparability of prediction for sociodemographic variables by examining the differences between observed and predicted error for both scores and pass/fail success rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medium to large correlations were discernible between MCAT total scores, UGPA, and COMLEX-USA examination outcomes. For both COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores and pass/fail outcomes, MCAT scores alone provided superior predictive value to UGPA alone. However, MCAT scores and UGPA utilized in conjunction provided the best predictive value. When predicting both licensure examination scores and pass/fail outcomes by sociodemographic variables, all three models provided comparable predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from this comprehensive study of DO-granting medical schools provide evidence for the value-added benefit of taking MCAT scores and UGPA into consideration, particularly when these measures are utilized in conjunction. Further, findings provide evidence indicating that individuals from different sociodemographic backgrounds who enter medical school with similar MCAT scores and UGPA perform similarly on licensure examination outcome measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141627942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating trends in orthopedic surgery match for osteopathic and allopathic graduates post-single accreditation transition. 调查单一认证过渡后骨科和全科毕业生骨科手术匹配的趋势。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0064
Michael Megafu, Omar D Guerrero
{"title":"Investigating trends in orthopedic surgery match for osteopathic and allopathic graduates post-single accreditation transition.","authors":"Michael Megafu, Omar D Guerrero","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0064","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1