CJC Open最新文献

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel method of conduction-system pacing in the muscular interventricular septum. Although LBBAP has been shown to produce physiologic electrical and mechanical intraventricular synchrony, superiority of LBBAP, compared to right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) at preserving normal left-ventricular (LV) systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been demonstrated. Left Bundle BRAVE is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, crossover study investigating the superiority of LBBAP, compared to RVSP, with respect to preservation of systolic function in patients with high-degree conduction disease after TAVR. Adults with severe aortic stenosis and normal systolic function who sustain high-grade atrioventricular block within 4 weeks of TAVR are eligible. All subjects receive a biventricular pacemaker generator with RVSP, and LBBAP leads. Participants are randomly assigned to 9 months of each pacing mode, in series. The primary endpoint is change in global longitudinal strain, tested in series with change in LV ejection fraction, comparing RVSP to LBBAP. Secondary endpoints include the following: echocardiographic markers of interventricular synchrony and right ventricular performance; heart failure functional status and symptom classification; 6-minute walk test results; pacemaker and lead performance; and brain natriuretic peptide concentration. The Left Bundle BRAVE study is designed to identify an upstream and clinically relevant marker of superiority in LBBAP, compared to RVSP, at preventing deterioration of LV function in patients with a high ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT05541679

Background

Ozanimod is a novel immune modulator that could be useful in viral pulmonary infections by reducing lung inflammation. It is an S1P receptor ligand known to induce bradycardia and more serious adverse cardiac effects, such as atrioventricular block and QT interval prolongation. We present a substudy of the COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) trial in which ozanimod was administered in acute pulmonary infection patients, to assess cardiac safety.

Methods

In this pilot randomized open-label trial, COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen support were randomized into 2 groups: standard-of-care + ozanimod (OZA) vs standard-of-care alone (SOC). All patients were monitored with a 14-day electrocardiogram monitor (CardioSTAT, Icentia, Quebec, QC) during their hospitalization. We evaluated the cardiac effects of ozanimod on heart rate (HR), PR interval length, and QT interval duration.

Results

A total of 42 patients were analyzed: 23 in the SOC group and 19 in the OZA group. Mean hourly HR over the first 10 days of treatment decreased in the OZA group, compared with that in the SOC group (P < 0.0001). The maximum decrease in HR occurred on day 3. The maximum decrease in HR occurred on day 3, without a significant difference between groups: 49 beats per minute (interquartile range, 42-59) in the OZA group, and 54 beats per minute (48–60) in the SOC group, P = 0.45. No high-degree atrioventricular block was recorded. QT and PR interval median values were within the normal range in both groups, without a significant difference.

Conclusions

The maximal reduction in HR occurred 3 days after the onset of ozanimod treatment in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, but it did not remain significant over the 10-day treatment period. No relevant cardiac adverse event was observed.

Over the past 15 years, sex-related differences in aortic valve (AV) stenosis (AS) have been highlighted, affecting various aspects of AS, such as the pathophysiology, AV lesions, left ventricle remodelling, and outcomes. Female patients were found to present a more profibrotic pattern of leaflet remodelling and/or thickening, whereas male patients have a preponderance of calcification within stenosed leaflets. The understanding of these sex differences is still limited, owing to the underrepresentation of female patients in many basic and clinical research studies and trials. A better understanding of sex differences in the pathophysiology of AS may highlight new therapeutic targets that potentially could be sex-specific. This review aims to summarize sex-related differences in AS, as discovered from basic research experiments, covering aspects of the disease ranging from leaflet composition to signalling pathways, sex hormones, genetics and/or transcriptomics, and potential sex-adapted medical treatments.

Care-coordination platforms may optimize ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment delays. This study aimed to assess the impact of Stenoa use on treatment delays in STEMI patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on local STEMI cases for the period between September 2020 and March 2023, comparing the times from first medical contact to device, before vs after the implementation of the Stenoa platform by the catheterization laboratory (cath-lab) and emergency department. A total of 180 patients were included. Significant reductions were found in times from first medical contact to electrocardiogram, from electrocardiogram to cath-lab activation, and from cath-lab activation to cath-lab arrival (P = 0.02, P = 0.04, and P = 0.02, respectively), after the platform was implemented. These findings suggest that use of Stenoa reduces STEMI door-to-balloon–time components.

Background

Frailty is generally a marker of worse prognosis. The impact of frailty on both in-hospital and long-term outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has not been well described. Given this context, we aimed to determine the prevalence and impact of frailty on in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed STEMI patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent pPCI at 1 of the 2 pPCI-capable hospitals at Vancouver Coastal Health. A frailty index (FI) was determined using a deficit-accumulation model, with those with an FI > 0.25 being defined as frail. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included in-hospital all-cause mortality, a composite of adverse in-hospital outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, reinfarction, major bleeding, or stroke), and the individual components of the composite.

Results

A total of 1579 patients were reviewed, of which 228 (14.4%) were determined to be frail. After multivariable adjustment, greater frailty (ie, increasing FI) was associated with increased in-hospital all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.35, P < 0.001), the composite adverse in-hospital outcome (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.68, P < 0.001), and 1-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10-2.00, P = 0.011).

Conclusions

In a contemporary STEMI cohort of older patients receiving pPCI, 1 in 7 patients were frail, with greater frailty being independently associated with increased in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes. These findings highlight the need for the early recognition of frailty and implementation of an interdisciplinary approach toward the management of frail STEMI patients.