Extremophiles are organisms adapted not only to survive in harsh conditions but thrive in environments considered extreme or uninhabitable by most life forms. They serve as a living reflection of a popular motto "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger" and show that life on Earth is spread well outside the human-centric comfort zone. In fact, extremophiles, being found in deep crustal and oceanic depths, outer space, highly acidic and basic conditions, extreme temperatures (+122 °C to -20 °C), and in the presence of toxins and high radiation, demonstrate life's remarkable adaptability. Polyextremophiles, capable of enduring multiple extreme conditions, further highlight this adaptability, whereas super-extremophiles, exhibiting resilience in seemingly impossible environments, showcase the extraordinary capacity of life to endure and thrive. Even though they inhabit vastly different environments, extremophiles, polyextremophiles, and super-extremophiles are all Earth organisms. They are made of the same elements found on our planet and share basic biological similarities with other life forms. Their survival in extreme conditions is due to adaptations and changes in their existing cellular structures and metabolic processes, and not because they use entirely new fundamental components or chemical reactions. While extremophiles employ a multitude of factors, mechanisms, and survival strategies to withstand harsh environments, this study addresses a specific aspect of extremophile adaptation by concentrating solely on the functions of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs).
The thermodynamic stability of proteins and regulation of their functional activity can be described within the energy landscape framework, where the former is provided by a unique native conformational ensemble separated by an energy gap from misfolded structures, and the latter is based on conformational transitions between structural states in the native ensemble. This work investigates the relationship between fundamentals of structural stability and dynamics-driven allosteric regulation. We describe here general proteomic trends and fold/function-specific determinants of protein stability. The intricate relationship between stability and allostery has been observed, showing how requirements on stability and thermal adaptation drive and shape the protein's "structural platform", while complementary sequence-structure determinants control the allosteric signaling and regulation. We illustrate our findings using four groups of proteins - inorganic pyrophosphatase and β-glucosidase representing hydrolases, the CheY signaling protein, and adenylate kinase - obtained from host organisms spanning from psychrophiles to hyperthermophiles. We also show that allosteric effects of mutations in adenylate kinase account for experimentally observed changes in organismal fitness expressed in bacterial growth rates. Epistasis arising from the effects of these mutations is another important phenomenon, resulting in unexpected non-additive changes in fitness that could not be explained by the stability changes alone. The findings in this work and options for further investigations of the stability-signaling relationship are provided by the sequence-dependent model of allostery employed here and implemented in AlloSigMA 3 - the latest update of our AlloSigMA web-server (https://allosigma.bii.a-star.edu.sg).

