首页 > 最新文献

Injury Epidemiology最新文献

英文 中文
Principles of musculoskeletal sport injuries for epidemiologists: a review. 流行病学家的肌肉骨骼运动损伤原理:综述。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00507-3
Chinchin Wang, Steven D Stovitz, Jay S Kaufman, Russell J Steele, Ian Shrier

Background: Musculoskeletal injuries are a common occurrence in sport. The goal of sport injury epidemiology is to study these injuries at a population level to inform their prevention and treatment.

Main body: This review provides an overview of musculoskeletal sport injuries and the musculoskeletal system from a biological and epidemiologic perspective, including injury mechanism, categorizations and types of sport injuries, healing, and subsequent injuries. It is meant to provide a concise introductory substantive background of musculoskeletal sport injuries for epidemiologists who may not have formal training in the underlying anatomy and pathophysiology.

Conclusion: An understanding of sport injuries is important for researchers in sport injury epidemiology when determining how to best define and assess their research questions and measures.

背景:肌肉骨骼损伤是体育运动中常见的损伤。运动损伤流行病学的目标是在人群水平上研究这些损伤,为其预防和治疗提供依据:这篇综述从生物学和流行病学的角度概述了肌肉骨骼运动损伤和肌肉骨骼系统,包括损伤机理、运动损伤的分类和类型、愈合和后续损伤。该书旨在为可能没有接受过基础解剖学和病理生理学正式培训的流行病学家提供有关肌肉骨骼运动损伤的简明介绍性实质性背景知识:了解运动损伤对于运动损伤流行病学研究人员确定如何最好地定义和评估其研究问题和措施非常重要。
{"title":"Principles of musculoskeletal sport injuries for epidemiologists: a review.","authors":"Chinchin Wang, Steven D Stovitz, Jay S Kaufman, Russell J Steele, Ian Shrier","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00507-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00507-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal injuries are a common occurrence in sport. The goal of sport injury epidemiology is to study these injuries at a population level to inform their prevention and treatment.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>This review provides an overview of musculoskeletal sport injuries and the musculoskeletal system from a biological and epidemiologic perspective, including injury mechanism, categorizations and types of sport injuries, healing, and subsequent injuries. It is meant to provide a concise introductory substantive background of musculoskeletal sport injuries for epidemiologists who may not have formal training in the underlying anatomy and pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An understanding of sport injuries is important for researchers in sport injury epidemiology when determining how to best define and assess their research questions and measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131288/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An updated analysis of safety climate and downstream outcomes in two convenience samples of U.S. fire departments (FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0 survey waves). 对两个美国消防部门便利样本(FOCUS 1.0 和 2.0 调查波)的安全氛围和下游结果进行最新分析。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00502-8
Ashley M Geczik, Jin Lee, Joseph A Allen, Madison E Raposa, Lucy F Robinson, D Alex Quistberg, Andrea L Davis, Jennifer A Taylor

Background: The Fire service Organizational Culture of Safety (FOCUS) survey is an assessment tool comprised of psychometrically validated metrics of safety climate, safety behavior, and downstream outcomes (organizational and injury) that are specific to the U.S. fire and rescue service.

Methods: This analysis consists of a descriptive summary of two independent survey waves (FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0). The fire departments included in these survey waves were from convenience sampling (n1.0 = 275; n2.0 = 170). In addition to department level characteristics, we examined individual level characteristics for firefighters and EMS providers in participating departments (n1.0 = 22,719; n2.0 = 16,882). We conducted regression analyses to examine the associations between safety climate and safety behaviors, organizational outcomes, and safety outcomes. All analyses were stratified by organization type (career, volunteer).

Results: Our analysis indicated that a majority of respondents were males (90.7%FOCUS 1.0; 90.4%FOCUS 2.0), non-officers (68.4%FOCUS 1.0; 66.4%FOCUS 2.0), and non-Hispanic Whites (70.8%FOCUS 1.0; 69.5%FOCUS 2.0). For both samples there was a higher prevalence of injuries among individuals in career departments (nFOCUS 1.0 = 3778 [17.5%]; nFOCUS 2.0 = 3072 [18.7%]) than volunteer departments (nFOCUS 1.0 = 103 [8.8%]; nFOCUS 2.0 = 34 [7.4%]). We observed an approximate 10-point difference between the mean scores of Management Commitment to Safety for career and volunteer departments in both samples. We observed associations for two organizational outcomes, Safety Behavior and Job Satisfaction, with Management Commitment to Safety and Supervisor Support for Safety overall and when stratified by organization type. We observed a decrease in the odds of injuries associated with a one-unit increase in Management Commitment to Safety (OR1.0 overall: 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; OR2.0 volunteer: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95) and Supervisor Support for Safety (OR1.0 overall: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97; OR1.0 career: 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98).

Conclusions: From our current study, and a prior analysis of a geographically stratified random sample of U.S. fire departments, we identified that from all the organizational outcomes, job satisfaction was most consistently associated with FOCUS safety climate. Further, firefighters in our samples consistently rated Supervisor Support for Safety higher than Management Commitment to Safety. Future interventions should support fire departments in improving their departmental Management Commitment to Safety and maintaining their Supervisor for Safety.

背景:消防组织安全文化(FOCUS)调查是一种评估工具,由经过心理测量学验证的安全氛围、安全行为和下游结果(组织和伤害)指标组成,专门针对美国消防和救援服务:本分析包括对两波独立调查(FOCUS 1.0 和 2.0)的描述性总结。这两次调查所涉及的消防部门均为方便抽样(n1.0 = 275;n2.0 = 170)。除了部门层面的特征外,我们还研究了参与部门的消防员和急救服务提供者的个人层面特征(n1.0 = 22,719; n2.0 = 16,882)。我们进行了回归分析,以研究安全氛围与安全行为、组织成果和安全成果之间的关联。所有分析均按组织类型(职业组织、志愿者组织)进行分层:我们的分析表明,大多数受访者为男性(90.7%FOCUS 1.0;90.4%FOCUS 2.0)、非官员(68.4%FOCUS 1.0;66.4%FOCUS 2.0)和非西班牙裔白人(70.8%FOCUS 1.0;69.5%FOCUS 2.0)。在这两个样本中,职业部门(nFOCUS 1.0 = 3778 [17.5%];nFOCUS 2.0 = 3072 [18.7%])的人员受伤率高于志愿部门(nFOCUS 1.0 = 103 [8.8%];nFOCUS 2.0 = 34 [7.4%])。我们观察到,在这两个样本中,职业部门和志愿部门的 "安全管理承诺 "平均得分相差约 10 分。我们观察到安全行为和工作满意度这两项组织结果与 "管理层对安全的承诺 "和 "主管对安全的支持 "的总体关系,以及在按组织类型分层时的关系。我们观察到,安全管理承诺每增加一个单位,受伤几率就会降低(总体 OR1.0:0.98,95% CI 0.97-0.99;志愿者 OR2.0:0.90,95% CI 0.99):0.90,95% CI 0.85-0.95)和主管对安全的支持(OR1.0 整体:0.95,95% CI 0.93-0.97;OR1.0 职业:0.95,95% CI 0.92-0.98):通过本次研究以及之前对美国消防部门的地理分层随机样本进行的分析,我们发现在所有组织结果中,工作满意度与 FOCUS 安全氛围的关系最为一致。此外,在我们的样本中,消防员对主管安全支持的评价始终高于对管理层安全承诺的评价。未来的干预措施应支持消防部门改善其部门的安全管理承诺,并维护其安全主管。
{"title":"An updated analysis of safety climate and downstream outcomes in two convenience samples of U.S. fire departments (FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0 survey waves).","authors":"Ashley M Geczik, Jin Lee, Joseph A Allen, Madison E Raposa, Lucy F Robinson, D Alex Quistberg, Andrea L Davis, Jennifer A Taylor","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00502-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00502-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Fire service Organizational Culture of Safety (FOCUS) survey is an assessment tool comprised of psychometrically validated metrics of safety climate, safety behavior, and downstream outcomes (organizational and injury) that are specific to the U.S. fire and rescue service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis consists of a descriptive summary of two independent survey waves (FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0). The fire departments included in these survey waves were from convenience sampling (n<sub>1.0</sub> = 275; n<sub>2.0</sub> = 170). In addition to department level characteristics, we examined individual level characteristics for firefighters and EMS providers in participating departments (n<sub>1.0</sub> = 22,719; n<sub>2.0</sub> = 16,882). We conducted regression analyses to examine the associations between safety climate and safety behaviors, organizational outcomes, and safety outcomes. All analyses were stratified by organization type (career, volunteer).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis indicated that a majority of respondents were males (90.7%<sub>FOCUS 1.0</sub>; 90.4%<sub>FOCUS 2.0</sub>), non-officers (68.4%<sub>FOCUS 1.0</sub>; 66.4%<sub>FOCUS 2.0</sub>), and non-Hispanic Whites (70.8%<sub>FOCUS 1.0</sub>; 69.5%<sub>FOCUS 2.0</sub>). For both samples there was a higher prevalence of injuries among individuals in career departments (n<sub>FOCUS 1.0</sub> = 3778 [17.5%]; n<sub>FOCUS 2.0</sub> = 3072 [18.7%]) than volunteer departments (n<sub>FOCUS 1.0</sub> = 103 [8.8%]; n<sub>FOCUS 2.0</sub> = 34 [7.4%]). We observed an approximate 10-point difference between the mean scores of Management Commitment to Safety for career and volunteer departments in both samples. We observed associations for two organizational outcomes, Safety Behavior and Job Satisfaction, with Management Commitment to Safety and Supervisor Support for Safety overall and when stratified by organization type. We observed a decrease in the odds of injuries associated with a one-unit increase in Management Commitment to Safety (OR<sub>1.0 overall</sub>: 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; OR<sub>2.0 volunteer</sub>: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95) and Supervisor Support for Safety (OR<sub>1.0 overall</sub>: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97; OR<sub>1.0 career</sub>: 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From our current study, and a prior analysis of a geographically stratified random sample of U.S. fire departments, we identified that from all the organizational outcomes, job satisfaction was most consistently associated with FOCUS safety climate. Further, firefighters in our samples consistently rated Supervisor Support for Safety higher than Management Commitment to Safety. Future interventions should support fire departments in improving their departmental Management Commitment to Safety and maintaining their Supervisor for Safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106928/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141077012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-year change in views of democracy and society and support for political violence in the USA: findings from a 2023 nationally representative survey. 美国人对民主和社会的看法以及对政治暴力的支持的单年变化:2023 年全国代表性调查的结果。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00503-7
Garen J Wintemute, Sonia L Robinson, Andrew Crawford, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Paul M Reeping, Aaron B Shev, Bradley Velasquez, Daniel Tancredi

Background: A 2022 survey in the USA found concerningly high prevalences of support for and personal willingness to engage in political violence, of beliefs associated with such violence, and of belief that civil war was likely in the near future. It is important to determine the durability of those findings.

Methods: Wave 2 of a nationally representative cohort survey was conducted May 18-June 8, 2023; the sample comprised all respondents to 2022's Wave 1. Outcomes are expressed as weighted proportions; changes from 2022 to 2023 are for respondents who participated in both surveys, based on aggregated individual change scores.

Results: The completion rate was 84.2%; there were 9385 respondents. After weighting, 50.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.4%, 52.1%) were female; weighted mean (SD) age was 48.5 (25.9) years. About 1 in 20 respondents (5.7%, 95% CI 5.1%, 6.4%) agreed strongly/very strongly that "in the next few years, there will be civil war in the United States," a 7.7% decrease. In 2023, fewer respondents considered violence to be usually/always justified to advance at least 1 of 17 specific political objectives [25.3% (95% CI 24.7%, 26.5%), a 6.8% decrease]. However, more respondents thought it very/extremely likely that within the next few years, in a situation where they consider political violence justified, "I will be armed with a gun" [9.0% (95% CI 8.3%, 9.8%), a 2.2% increase] and "I will shoot someone with a gun" [1.8% (95% CI 1.4%, 2.2%), a 0.6% increase]. Among respondents who considered violence usually/always justified to advance at least 1 political objective, about 1 in 20 also thought it very/extremely likely that they would threaten someone with a gun (5.4%, 95% CI 4.0%, 7.0%) or shoot someone (5.7%, 95% CI 4.3%, 7.1%) to advance such an objective.

Conclusions: In this cohort, support for political violence declined from 2022 to 2023, but predictions of firearm use in political violence increased. These findings can help guide prevention efforts, which are urgently needed.

背景:2022 年在美国进行的一项调查发现,支持参与政治暴力、个人愿意参与政治暴力、与政治暴力相关的信念以及认为不久的将来可能发生内战的比例都很高,这令人担忧。确定这些发现的持久性非常重要:2023 年 5 月 18 日至 6 月 8 日进行了具有全国代表性的队列调查第 2 波;样本包括 2022 年第 1 波的所有受访者。结果以加权比例表示;从 2022 年到 2023 年的变化是针对参加两次调查的受访者,基于个人变化的综合得分:调查完成率为 84.2%,共有 9385 名受访者。加权后,50.7%(95% 置信区间 49.4%,52.1%)为女性;加权平均(标清)年龄为 48.5(25.9)岁。每 20 位受访者中约有 1 位(5.7%,95% 置信区间为 5.1%,6.4%)强烈/非常强烈地认为 "未来几年美国将发生内战",降幅为 7.7%。在 2023 年,更少的受訪者認為通常/總是有理由使用暴力來達成 17 項特定政治目標中的至少一項[25.3% (95% CI 24.7%, 26.5%),下降了 6.8%]。不过,更多的受访者认为,在未来几年内,在他们认为政治暴力是合理的情况下,"我会持枪"[9.0% (95% CI 8.3%, 9.8%),增加 2.2%]和 "我会用枪打人"[1.8% (95% CI 1.4%, 2.2%),增加 0.6%]的可能性非常大/极大。在认为通常/总是有理由使用暴力来实现至少一个政治目标的受访者中,每 20 人中就有 1 人认为他们非常/极有可能用枪威胁他人(5.4%,95% CI 4.0%,7.0%)或向他人开枪(5.7%,95% CI 4.3%,7.1%)来实现这一目标:在这个队列中,对政治暴力的支持从 2022 年到 2023 年有所下降,但对在政治暴力中使用枪支的预测却有所上升。这些发现有助于指导迫切需要的预防工作。
{"title":"Single-year change in views of democracy and society and support for political violence in the USA: findings from a 2023 nationally representative survey.","authors":"Garen J Wintemute, Sonia L Robinson, Andrew Crawford, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Paul M Reeping, Aaron B Shev, Bradley Velasquez, Daniel Tancredi","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00503-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00503-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A 2022 survey in the USA found concerningly high prevalences of support for and personal willingness to engage in political violence, of beliefs associated with such violence, and of belief that civil war was likely in the near future. It is important to determine the durability of those findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Wave 2 of a nationally representative cohort survey was conducted May 18-June 8, 2023; the sample comprised all respondents to 2022's Wave 1. Outcomes are expressed as weighted proportions; changes from 2022 to 2023 are for respondents who participated in both surveys, based on aggregated individual change scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The completion rate was 84.2%; there were 9385 respondents. After weighting, 50.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.4%, 52.1%) were female; weighted mean (SD) age was 48.5 (25.9) years. About 1 in 20 respondents (5.7%, 95% CI 5.1%, 6.4%) agreed strongly/very strongly that \"in the next few years, there will be civil war in the United States,\" a 7.7% decrease. In 2023, fewer respondents considered violence to be usually/always justified to advance at least 1 of 17 specific political objectives [25.3% (95% CI 24.7%, 26.5%), a 6.8% decrease]. However, more respondents thought it very/extremely likely that within the next few years, in a situation where they consider political violence justified, \"I will be armed with a gun\" [9.0% (95% CI 8.3%, 9.8%), a 2.2% increase] and \"I will shoot someone with a gun\" [1.8% (95% CI 1.4%, 2.2%), a 0.6% increase]. Among respondents who considered violence usually/always justified to advance at least 1 political objective, about 1 in 20 also thought it very/extremely likely that they would threaten someone with a gun (5.4%, 95% CI 4.0%, 7.0%) or shoot someone (5.7%, 95% CI 4.3%, 7.1%) to advance such an objective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort, support for political violence declined from 2022 to 2023, but predictions of firearm use in political violence increased. These findings can help guide prevention efforts, which are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110245/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141077017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A joinpoint analysis examining trends in firearm injuries at six us trauma centers from 2016 to 2022. 一项联点分析研究了 2016 年至 2022 年美国六家创伤中心的枪支伤害趋势。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00505-5
Kristin Salottolo, R Joseph Sliter, Gary Marshall, Carlos H Palacio Lascano, Glenda Quan, David Hamilton, Robert Madayag, Gina Berg, David Bar-Or

Background: There is an epidemic of firearm injuries in the United States since the mid-2000s. Thus, we sought to examine whether hospitalization from firearm injuries have increased over time, and to examine temporal changes in patient demographics, firearm injury intent, and injury severity.

Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study of patients hospitalized with a traumatic injury to six US level I trauma centers between 1/1/2016 and 6/30/2022. ICD-10-CM cause codes were used to identify and describe firearm injuries. Temporal trends were compared for demographics (age, sex, race, insured status), intent (assault, unintentional, self-harm, legal intervention, and undetermined), and severity (death, ICU admission, severe injury (injury severity score ≥ 16), receipt of blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation, and hospital and ICU LOS (days). Temporal trends were examined over 13 six-month intervals (H1, January-June; H2, July-December) using joinpoint regression and reported as semi-annual percent change (SPC); significance was p < 0.05.

Results: Firearm injuries accounted for 2.6% (1908 of 72,474) of trauma hospitalizations. The rate of firearm injuries initially declined from 2016-H1 to 2018-H2 (SPC = - 4.0%, p = 0.002), followed by increased rates from 2018-H2 to 2020-H1 (SPC = 9.0%, p = 0.005), before stabilizing from 2020-H1 to 2022-H1 (0.5%, p = 0.73). NH black patients had the greatest hospitalization rate from firearm injuries (14.0%) and were the only group to demonstrate a temporal increase (SPC = 6.3%, p < 0.001). The proportion of uninsured patients increased (SPC = 2.3%, p = 0.02) but there were no temporal changes by age or sex. ICU admission rates declined (SPC = - 2.2%, p < 0.001), but ICU LOS increased (SPC = 2.8%, p = 0.04). There were no significant changes over time in rates of death (SPC = 0.3%), severe injury (SPC = 1.6%), blood transfusion (SPC = 0.6%), and mechanical ventilation (SPC = 0.6%). When examined by intent, self-harm injuries declined over time (SPC = - 4.1%, p < 0.001), assaults declined through 2019-H2 (SPC = - 5.6%, p = 0.01) before increasing through 2022-H1 (SPC = 6.5%, p = 0.01), while undetermined injuries increased through 2019-H1 (SPC = 24.1%, p = 0.01) then stabilized (SPC = - 4.5%, p = 0.39); there were no temporal changes in unintentional injuries or legal intervention.

Conclusions: Hospitalizations from firearm injuries are increasing following a period of declines, driven by increases among NH Black patients. Trauma systems need to consider these changing trends to best address the needs of the injured population.

背景:自 2000 年代中期以来,枪支伤害在美国呈流行趋势。因此,我们试图研究枪支伤害住院人数是否随着时间的推移而增加,并研究患者人口统计学、枪支伤害意图和伤害严重程度的时间变化:这是一项多中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究,研究对象是 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间在美国六家一级创伤中心住院治疗的外伤患者。研究使用ICD-10-CM病因代码来识别和描述枪伤。比较了人口统计学(年龄、性别、种族、投保情况)、意图(攻击、无意、自残、法律干预和未确定)和严重程度(死亡、入住重症监护室、重伤(损伤严重程度评分≥16)、接受输血、机械通气以及住院和重症监护室寿命(天数)的时间趋势。采用连接点回归法对 13 个六个月间隔期(H1,1 月至 6 月;H2,7 月至 12 月)内的时间趋势进行了研究,并以半年变化百分比 (SPC) 的形式进行报告;显著性以 p 表示:火器伤害占创伤住院人数的 2.6%(72,474 例中的 1908 例)。从2016-H1到2018-H2,火器致伤率最初有所下降(SPC = - 4.0%,p = 0.002),随后从2018-H2到2020-H1,火器致伤率有所上升(SPC = 9.0%,p = 0.005),然后从2020-H1到2022-H1趋于稳定(0.5%,p = 0.73)。新罕布什尔州黑人患者因枪支伤害住院的比例最高(14.0%),也是唯一呈现出时间性增长的群体(SPC = 6.3%,p 结论:新罕布什尔州黑人患者因枪支伤害住院的比例从 2020-H1 到 2022-H1(0.5%,p = 0.73):枪支伤害住院率在经历了一段时间的下降后正在上升,这主要是由北卡罗来纳州黑人患者住院率的上升所引起的。创伤系统需要考虑这些变化趋势,以最好地满足受伤人群的需求。
{"title":"A joinpoint analysis examining trends in firearm injuries at six us trauma centers from 2016 to 2022.","authors":"Kristin Salottolo, R Joseph Sliter, Gary Marshall, Carlos H Palacio Lascano, Glenda Quan, David Hamilton, Robert Madayag, Gina Berg, David Bar-Or","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00505-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00505-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an epidemic of firearm injuries in the United States since the mid-2000s. Thus, we sought to examine whether hospitalization from firearm injuries have increased over time, and to examine temporal changes in patient demographics, firearm injury intent, and injury severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study of patients hospitalized with a traumatic injury to six US level I trauma centers between 1/1/2016 and 6/30/2022. ICD-10-CM cause codes were used to identify and describe firearm injuries. Temporal trends were compared for demographics (age, sex, race, insured status), intent (assault, unintentional, self-harm, legal intervention, and undetermined), and severity (death, ICU admission, severe injury (injury severity score ≥ 16), receipt of blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation, and hospital and ICU LOS (days). Temporal trends were examined over 13 six-month intervals (H1, January-June; H2, July-December) using joinpoint regression and reported as semi-annual percent change (SPC); significance was p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Firearm injuries accounted for 2.6% (1908 of 72,474) of trauma hospitalizations. The rate of firearm injuries initially declined from 2016-H1 to 2018-H2 (SPC = - 4.0%, p = 0.002), followed by increased rates from 2018-H2 to 2020-H1 (SPC = 9.0%, p = 0.005), before stabilizing from 2020-H1 to 2022-H1 (0.5%, p = 0.73). NH black patients had the greatest hospitalization rate from firearm injuries (14.0%) and were the only group to demonstrate a temporal increase (SPC = 6.3%, p < 0.001). The proportion of uninsured patients increased (SPC = 2.3%, p = 0.02) but there were no temporal changes by age or sex. ICU admission rates declined (SPC = - 2.2%, p < 0.001), but ICU LOS increased (SPC = 2.8%, p = 0.04). There were no significant changes over time in rates of death (SPC = 0.3%), severe injury (SPC = 1.6%), blood transfusion (SPC = 0.6%), and mechanical ventilation (SPC = 0.6%). When examined by intent, self-harm injuries declined over time (SPC = - 4.1%, p < 0.001), assaults declined through 2019-H2 (SPC = - 5.6%, p = 0.01) before increasing through 2022-H1 (SPC = 6.5%, p = 0.01), while undetermined injuries increased through 2019-H1 (SPC = 24.1%, p = 0.01) then stabilized (SPC = - 4.5%, p = 0.39); there were no temporal changes in unintentional injuries or legal intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospitalizations from firearm injuries are increasing following a period of declines, driven by increases among NH Black patients. Trauma systems need to consider these changing trends to best address the needs of the injured population.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11092259/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140916958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ghost guns and crime: a tale of two California cities. 幽灵枪与犯罪:加州两座城市的故事。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00500-w
Alaina De Biasi, Anthony A Braga, Brad Velasquez, Garen Wintemute

Background: Privately made firearms (PMFs) or "ghost guns" are homemade, unserialized, untraceable firearms that have been increasingly used in violent crime in the United States. Very little is known about the types of PMFs recovered by law enforcement agencies and the crimes associated with these recoveries. This lack of information limits effective violence prevention policies and practices. Comparative analysis of PMF recoveries in specific cities helps clarify whether local PMF patterns and characteristics vary or reflect more general trends. This research advances epidemiological understanding of emergent violent gun injury prevention challenges by identifying variations in recovered PMF types and use in violent, drug, and weapon-related offenses in Los Angeles and San Diego, California.

Methods: Conjunctive analysis of case configurations (CACC) identifies patterns among observations (i.e., case configurations) and calculates their probability associated with a given outcome. CACC was used to identify the most common types of PMFs recovered by the Los Angeles (LAPD) and San Diego (SDPD) police departments. For each department and offense type, case configurations with above-average probabilities of offense involvement were determined. Comparisons across departments were made to identify similarities and differences in PMF characteristics and usage.

Results: PMFs were more likely to be involved in violent and weapon-related offenses in Los Angles but more likely to be involved in drug-related offenses in San Diego. In both cities, the 9 mm Polymer 80 handgun was the dominant PMF. However, 9 mm handguns were most likely to be involved in weapon-related offenses in Los Angeles compared to 0.40 handguns in San Diego. Furthermore, large-caliber handguns tended to display above-average probabilities of involvement in violent and drug offenses in Los Angeles. Long guns were represented in case configurations with above-average probabilities of involvement in substantive crimes, including violence.

Conclusions: Comparative analyses of PMF recovery patterns in Los Angeles and San Diego reveal meaningful contextual variations in PMF characteristics and suggest intentional firearm type selections by offenders. The results support increased regulation of PMFs and highlight the importance of efforts to identify and disrupt the illicit supply of large-caliber PMF handguns and PMF long guns.

背景:私制枪支(PMFs)或 "幽灵枪 "是自制的、没有序列号的、无法追踪的枪支,在美国越来越多地被用于暴力犯罪。人们对执法机构收缴的私制枪支类型以及与这些收缴枪支相关的犯罪知之甚少。这种信息的缺乏限制了有效的暴力预防政策和实践。对特定城市回收的 PMF 进行比较分析,有助于澄清当地 PMF 的模式和特征是否有所不同,或者是否反映了更普遍的趋势。这项研究通过确定加利福尼亚州洛杉矶和圣地亚哥回收的 PMF 类型以及在暴力、毒品和武器相关犯罪中的使用情况的变化,推进了对新出现的暴力枪支伤害预防挑战的流行病学理解:案件配置关联分析(CACC)可识别观察结果(即案件配置)之间的模式,并计算其与特定结果相关的概率。CACC 被用来识别洛杉矶(LAPD)和圣地亚哥(SDPD)警察局回收的最常见类型的 PMF。针对每个部门和犯罪类型,确定了犯罪参与概率高于平均值的案件配置。对各部门进行比较,以确定 PMF 特征和使用情况的异同:在洛杉矶,PMF 更有可能参与暴力和武器相关犯罪,但在圣地亚哥,PMF 更有可能参与毒品相关犯罪。在这两个城市,9 毫米聚合物 80 型手枪是主要的 PMF。然而,在洛杉矶,9 毫米手枪最有可能涉及与武器有关的犯罪,而在圣地亚哥,9 毫米手枪的涉案率为 0.40。此外,在洛杉矶,大口径手枪参与暴力和毒品犯罪的概率往往高于平均水平。在案件配置中,长枪参与暴力等实质性犯罪的概率高于平均水平:对洛杉矶和圣迭戈的 PMF 回收模式进行比较分析,揭示了 PMF 特征的有意义的环境变化,并表明罪犯有意选择枪支类型。研究结果支持加强对PMF的监管,并强调了查明和打击大口径PMF手枪和PMF长枪非法供应的重要性。
{"title":"Ghost guns and crime: a tale of two California cities.","authors":"Alaina De Biasi, Anthony A Braga, Brad Velasquez, Garen Wintemute","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00500-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00500-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Privately made firearms (PMFs) or \"ghost guns\" are homemade, unserialized, untraceable firearms that have been increasingly used in violent crime in the United States. Very little is known about the types of PMFs recovered by law enforcement agencies and the crimes associated with these recoveries. This lack of information limits effective violence prevention policies and practices. Comparative analysis of PMF recoveries in specific cities helps clarify whether local PMF patterns and characteristics vary or reflect more general trends. This research advances epidemiological understanding of emergent violent gun injury prevention challenges by identifying variations in recovered PMF types and use in violent, drug, and weapon-related offenses in Los Angeles and San Diego, California.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conjunctive analysis of case configurations (CACC) identifies patterns among observations (i.e., case configurations) and calculates their probability associated with a given outcome. CACC was used to identify the most common types of PMFs recovered by the Los Angeles (LAPD) and San Diego (SDPD) police departments. For each department and offense type, case configurations with above-average probabilities of offense involvement were determined. Comparisons across departments were made to identify similarities and differences in PMF characteristics and usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PMFs were more likely to be involved in violent and weapon-related offenses in Los Angles but more likely to be involved in drug-related offenses in San Diego. In both cities, the 9 mm Polymer 80 handgun was the dominant PMF. However, 9 mm handguns were most likely to be involved in weapon-related offenses in Los Angeles compared to 0.40 handguns in San Diego. Furthermore, large-caliber handguns tended to display above-average probabilities of involvement in violent and drug offenses in Los Angeles. Long guns were represented in case configurations with above-average probabilities of involvement in substantive crimes, including violence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparative analyses of PMF recovery patterns in Los Angeles and San Diego reveal meaningful contextual variations in PMF characteristics and suggest intentional firearm type selections by offenders. The results support increased regulation of PMFs and highlight the importance of efforts to identify and disrupt the illicit supply of large-caliber PMF handguns and PMF long guns.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11067238/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140858495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in police complaints and arrests on New York City subways, 2018 to 2023: an interrupted time-series analysis. 2018 年至 2023 年纽约市地铁上的警察投诉和逮捕趋势:间断时间序列分析。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00501-9
Leah E Roberts, Christina A Mehranbod, Brady Bushover, Ariana N Gobaud, Evan L Eschliman, Carolyn Fish, Siddhesh Zadey, Xiang Gao, Christopher N Morrison

Background: Public transportation use is influenced by perceptions of safety. Concerns related to crime on New York City (NYC) transit have risen following NYC's COVID-19 pandemic state of emergency declaration in 2020, leading to declines in subway ridership. In response, the most recent mayoral administration implemented a Subway Safety Plan in 2022. This study aimed to quantify the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Subway Safety Plan on rates of complaints to and arrests by the New York City Police Department (NYPD) Transit Bureau.

Methods: Using publicly available data on complaints and arrests, we conducted interrupted time-series analyses using autoregressive integrated moving average models applied to monthly data for the period from September 2018 to August 2023. We estimated changes in the rates of complaints to and arrests by the NYPD Transit Bureau before and after: (1) the COVID-19 pandemic state of emergency declaration (i.e., March 2020), and (2) the announcement of the Subway Safety Plan (i.e., February 2022). We also examined trends by complaint and arrest type as well as changes in proportion of arrests by demographic and geographic groups.

Results: After the COVID-19 pandemic declaration, there was an 84% increase (i.e., an absolute increase of 6.07 per 1,000,000 riders, CI 1.42, 10.71) in complaints to the NYPD Transit Bureau, including a 99% increase (0.91 per 1,000,000 riders, CI 0.42, 1.41) in complaints for assault and a 125% increase in complaints for harassment (0.94 per 1,000,000 riders, CI 0.29, 1.60). Following the Subway Safety Plan there was an increase in the rate of arrests for harassment (0.004 per 1,000,000 riders, CI 0.001, 0.007), as well as decreases in the proportion of arrests for individuals racialized as White (- 0.02, CI - 0.04, - 0.01) and proportion of arrests in the borough of Manhattan (- 0.13, CI - 0.17, - 0.09).

Conclusions: The increased rates of complaints to the NYPD Transit Bureau following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic remained elevated following the enactment of the Subway Safety Plan. Further evaluation efforts can help identify effective means of promoting safety on public transportation.

背景:公共交通的使用受到安全感的影响。在 2020 年纽约市宣布 COVID-19 大流行病进入紧急状态后,人们对纽约市(NYC)公交车上犯罪问题的担忧不断升温,导致地铁乘客数量下降。为此,最近一届市长政府于 2022 年实施了地铁安全计划。本研究旨在量化 COVID-19 大流行病和地铁安全计划对纽约市警察局(NYPD)公交局的投诉率和逮捕率的影响:利用公开的投诉和逮捕数据,我们使用自回归综合移动平均模型对 2018 年 9 月至 2023 年 8 月期间的月度数据进行了间断时间序列分析。我们估算了在以下时间前后纽约市警察局公交局的投诉率和逮捕率的变化:(1) COVID-19 大流行病紧急状态宣布(即 2020 年 3 月),以及 (2) 地铁安全计划宣布(即 2022 年 2 月)。我们还研究了投诉和逮捕类型的趋势,以及不同人口和地域群体逮捕比例的变化:在 COVID-19 大流行宣布后,向纽约市警察局公交局提出的投诉增加了 84%(即每 100 万名乘客绝对增加 6.07 起,CI 值为 1.42 - 10.71),其中攻击投诉增加了 99%(每 100 万名乘客 0.91 起,CI 值为 0.42 - 1.41),骚扰投诉增加了 125%(每 100 万名乘客 0.94 起,CI 值为 0.29 - 1.60)。地铁安全计划实施后,因骚扰而被捕的比例有所上升(每 100 万乘客 0.004,CI 0.001,0.007),因白人而被捕的比例有所下降(- 0.02,CI - 0.04,- 0.01),在曼哈顿区被捕的比例有所下降(- 0.13,CI - 0.17,- 0.09):地铁安全计划》颁布后,COVID-19 大流行病发生后向纽约市警察局交通局投诉的比率仍在上升。进一步的评估工作有助于确定促进公共交通安全的有效方法。
{"title":"Trends in police complaints and arrests on New York City subways, 2018 to 2023: an interrupted time-series analysis.","authors":"Leah E Roberts, Christina A Mehranbod, Brady Bushover, Ariana N Gobaud, Evan L Eschliman, Carolyn Fish, Siddhesh Zadey, Xiang Gao, Christopher N Morrison","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00501-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00501-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public transportation use is influenced by perceptions of safety. Concerns related to crime on New York City (NYC) transit have risen following NYC's COVID-19 pandemic state of emergency declaration in 2020, leading to declines in subway ridership. In response, the most recent mayoral administration implemented a Subway Safety Plan in 2022. This study aimed to quantify the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Subway Safety Plan on rates of complaints to and arrests by the New York City Police Department (NYPD) Transit Bureau.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using publicly available data on complaints and arrests, we conducted interrupted time-series analyses using autoregressive integrated moving average models applied to monthly data for the period from September 2018 to August 2023. We estimated changes in the rates of complaints to and arrests by the NYPD Transit Bureau before and after: (1) the COVID-19 pandemic state of emergency declaration (i.e., March 2020), and (2) the announcement of the Subway Safety Plan (i.e., February 2022). We also examined trends by complaint and arrest type as well as changes in proportion of arrests by demographic and geographic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the COVID-19 pandemic declaration, there was an 84% increase (i.e., an absolute increase of 6.07 per 1,000,000 riders, CI 1.42, 10.71) in complaints to the NYPD Transit Bureau, including a 99% increase (0.91 per 1,000,000 riders, CI 0.42, 1.41) in complaints for assault and a 125% increase in complaints for harassment (0.94 per 1,000,000 riders, CI 0.29, 1.60). Following the Subway Safety Plan there was an increase in the rate of arrests for harassment (0.004 per 1,000,000 riders, CI 0.001, 0.007), as well as decreases in the proportion of arrests for individuals racialized as White (- 0.02, CI - 0.04, - 0.01) and proportion of arrests in the borough of Manhattan (- 0.13, CI - 0.17, - 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increased rates of complaints to the NYPD Transit Bureau following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic remained elevated following the enactment of the Subway Safety Plan. Further evaluation efforts can help identify effective means of promoting safety on public transportation.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055262/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140872488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers 州大麻法律和致命受伤司机对大麻的积极态度
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00498-1
T. Leavitt, Stanford T. Chihuri, Guohua Li
{"title":"State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers","authors":"T. Leavitt, Stanford T. Chihuri, Guohua Li","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00498-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00498-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140713647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Injury and fatality risks for child pedestrians and cyclists on public roads 公共道路上儿童行人和骑自行车者的伤亡风险
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00497-2
D. Swedler, Bina Ali, Rebecca Hoffman, Jennifer Leonardo, Eduardo Romano, Ted R Miller
{"title":"Injury and fatality risks for child pedestrians and cyclists on public roads","authors":"D. Swedler, Bina Ali, Rebecca Hoffman, Jennifer Leonardo, Eduardo Romano, Ted R Miller","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00497-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00497-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140714753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Who are the “police” in “police violence”? Fatal violence by U.S. law enforcement agencies across levels of government 谁是 "警察暴力 "中的 "警察"?美国各级政府执法机构的致命暴力行为
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00496-3
Jaquelyn L. Jahn, Gabriel L. Schwartz
{"title":"Who are the “police” in “police violence”? Fatal violence by U.S. law enforcement agencies across levels of government","authors":"Jaquelyn L. Jahn, Gabriel L. Schwartz","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00496-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00496-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140743424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ProjectDRIVE: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to improve driving practices of high-risk teen drivers with a traffic violation. ProjectDRIVE:随机对照试验研究方案,旨在改善有交通违规行为的高风险青少年驾驶员的驾驶习惯。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00494-5
Jingzhen Yang, Corinne Peek-Asa, Ying Zhang, Cara Hamann, Motao Zhu, Yang Wang, Archana Kaur, Robyn Recker, Dominique Rose, Lisa Roth

Background: Teen drivers with a traffic violation are at increased risk for crashes and crash-related injuries; however, most parent-focused interventions target teen drivers with supervised learner's permits. Very few interventions are implemented at the probationary driver's license stage or target high-risk teen drivers, such as those with traffic violations. This paper describes the protocol of ProjectDRIVE, A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Driving Practices of High-Risk Teen Drivers with a Traffic Violation, which targets improving parent-teen communication about safe driving practices to reduce unsafe driving behaviors and traffic violation recidivism of teen drivers cited for traffic violation.

Methods: Teen drivers (ages 16 or 17) cited for a moving violation and the parent/legal guardian most involved with the teen's driving are recruited from juvenile traffic courts following their required court hearing. After completing informed consent/assent, enrolled dyads are randomized into one of three groups using stratified block randomization: control, device feedback only, or device feedback plus parent communication training. Participating dyads are followed for 6 months with 3 months of active intervention. Using in-vehicle device and smartphone application technology, the study provides real-time and cumulative driving feedback to intervention teens and collects continually recorded, objectively measured driving outcome data throughout the teen's study participation. Primary outcomes include rates of risky driving events and unsafe driving behaviors per 1000 miles driven. Secondary outcomes include traffic violation recidivism up to 12 months following study completion and frequency and quality of parent-teen communication about safe driving practices.

Discussion: Through partnership with the local juvenile traffic courts, this study integrates recruitment and randomization into existing court practices. Successfully completing this study will significantly impact juvenile traffic court's practices and policies by informing judges' decisions regarding the driving safety programs they refer to teens to prevent motor vehicle crashes and crash-related injuries and deaths. Trial registration The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04317664) on March 19, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04317664 and updated on April 27, 2021. This protocol was developed per the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) Checklist.

背景:有交通违规行为的青少年驾驶者发生交通事故和与交通事故相关的伤害的风险更高;然而,大多数以家长为重点的干预措施都是针对持有受监督的学习驾驶执照的青少年驾驶者。很少有干预措施是在暂准驾照阶段实施的,也很少有针对高风险青少年驾驶者(如有交通违规行为的青少年驾驶者)的干预措施。本文介绍了项目ProjectDRIVE(改善交通违规高风险青少年驾驶员驾驶行为的随机对照试验)的方案,该方案旨在改善家长与青少年在安全驾驶行为方面的沟通,以减少不安全驾驶行为和交通违规青少年驾驶员的交通违规累犯率:方法:因交通违规而被传唤的青少年驾驶员(16 或 17 岁)以及与该青少年驾驶行为关系最密切的家长/法定监护人在按规定接受法庭听证后从青少年交通法庭招募。在填写知情同意书/同意书后,采用分层分块随机法将入选组合随机分为三组:对照组、仅设备反馈组或设备反馈加家长沟通培训组。对参与的二人组进行为期 6 个月的跟踪,其中 3 个月为积极干预期。该研究利用车载设备和智能手机应用技术,为接受干预的青少年提供实时和累积的驾驶反馈,并在青少年参与研究的整个过程中收集持续记录的、客观测量的驾驶结果数据。主要结果包括每行驶 1000 英里的危险驾驶事件率和不安全驾驶行为率。次要结果包括研究完成后 12 个月内的交通违规再犯率,以及家长与青少年就安全驾驶实践进行沟通的频率和质量:通过与当地青少年交通法庭合作,本研究将招募和随机化融入到现有的法庭实践中。本研究的成功完成将对青少年交通法庭的实践和政策产生重大影响,为法官在向青少年推荐驾驶安全项目时提供决策依据,从而预防机动车碰撞事故以及与碰撞事故相关的伤亡事故。试验注册 该研究于2020年3月19日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册中心注册(NCT04317664),https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04317664,并于2021年4月27日更新。该方案是根据 SPIRIT(标准方案项目:介入性试验建议)清单制定的。
{"title":"ProjectDRIVE: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to improve driving practices of high-risk teen drivers with a traffic violation.","authors":"Jingzhen Yang, Corinne Peek-Asa, Ying Zhang, Cara Hamann, Motao Zhu, Yang Wang, Archana Kaur, Robyn Recker, Dominique Rose, Lisa Roth","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00494-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00494-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teen drivers with a traffic violation are at increased risk for crashes and crash-related injuries; however, most parent-focused interventions target teen drivers with supervised learner's permits. Very few interventions are implemented at the probationary driver's license stage or target high-risk teen drivers, such as those with traffic violations. This paper describes the protocol of ProjectDRIVE, A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Driving Practices of High-Risk Teen Drivers with a Traffic Violation, which targets improving parent-teen communication about safe driving practices to reduce unsafe driving behaviors and traffic violation recidivism of teen drivers cited for traffic violation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teen drivers (ages 16 or 17) cited for a moving violation and the parent/legal guardian most involved with the teen's driving are recruited from juvenile traffic courts following their required court hearing. After completing informed consent/assent, enrolled dyads are randomized into one of three groups using stratified block randomization: control, device feedback only, or device feedback plus parent communication training. Participating dyads are followed for 6 months with 3 months of active intervention. Using in-vehicle device and smartphone application technology, the study provides real-time and cumulative driving feedback to intervention teens and collects continually recorded, objectively measured driving outcome data throughout the teen's study participation. Primary outcomes include rates of risky driving events and unsafe driving behaviors per 1000 miles driven. Secondary outcomes include traffic violation recidivism up to 12 months following study completion and frequency and quality of parent-teen communication about safe driving practices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Through partnership with the local juvenile traffic courts, this study integrates recruitment and randomization into existing court practices. Successfully completing this study will significantly impact juvenile traffic court's practices and policies by informing judges' decisions regarding the driving safety programs they refer to teens to prevent motor vehicle crashes and crash-related injuries and deaths. Trial registration The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04317664) on March 19, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04317664 and updated on April 27, 2021. This protocol was developed per the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) Checklist.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979602/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140327221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Injury Epidemiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1