首页 > 最新文献

Injury Epidemiology最新文献

英文 中文
Demographic differences in perceived effectiveness for policies to prevent school shootings: results from a representative survey in New Jersey. 预防校园枪击事件政策效果的人口统计学差异:新泽西州一项代表性调查的结果。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00520-6
Michael Anestis, Jayna Moceri-Brooks, Allison Bond, Daniel Semenza

Objective: To determine what firearm policies New Jersey residents believe will prevent school shootings and the extent to which this varies by sex, firearm ownership status, and political affiliation.

Methods: A representative sample of New Jersey residents (N = 1,018) was collected via the Eagleton Center on Public Interest Polling (ECPIP). Data were weighted to reflect the state's population. Participants were asked to rate how helpful they perceived different firearm-related policies to be for preventing school shootings.

Results: Findings indicate that participants perceived universal and expanded background checks, increased mental health funding, and requiring a license for firearm purchases as most effective for preventing school shootings. Arming school personnel, prayer in schools, decreasing the number of entrances at schools, and secure storage requirements were viewed as less effective. Firearm ownership, sex, and political affiliation significantly influenced perceptions of the effectiveness of these policies.

Conclusion: The study examined the perceived effectiveness of policies to prevent school shootings. The study highlights disparities and commonalities in policy support among different groups, emphasizing the importance of collective efforts to address gun violence in schools.

目标:确定新泽西州居民认为哪些枪支政策可以预防校园枪击事件,以及不同性别、拥有枪支状况和政治派别的居民在这方面的不同程度:确定新泽西州居民认为哪些枪支政策可以防止校园枪击事件的发生,以及不同性别、枪支拥有状况和政治派别在此方面的差异程度:通过伊格尔顿公共利益民意调查中心(Eagleton Center on Public Interest Polling,ECPIP)收集了新泽西州居民的代表性样本(N = 1,018)。数据经过加权处理,以反映该州的人口情况。参与者被要求对他们认为不同的枪支相关政策对预防校园枪击事件的帮助程度进行评分:调查结果表明,参与者认为普及和扩大背景调查、增加心理健康资助以及要求购买枪支必须持有许可证对预防校园枪击案最为有效。而武装学校工作人员、在学校祈祷、减少学校入口数量和安全存储要求则被认为效果较差。拥有枪支、性别和政治派别在很大程度上影响了人们对这些政策有效性的看法:本研究调查了人们对预防校园枪击事件政策有效性的看法。研究强调了不同群体在政策支持方面的差异和共性,强调了共同努力解决校园枪支暴力问题的重要性。
{"title":"Demographic differences in perceived effectiveness for policies to prevent school shootings: results from a representative survey in New Jersey.","authors":"Michael Anestis, Jayna Moceri-Brooks, Allison Bond, Daniel Semenza","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00520-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00520-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine what firearm policies New Jersey residents believe will prevent school shootings and the extent to which this varies by sex, firearm ownership status, and political affiliation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A representative sample of New Jersey residents (N = 1,018) was collected via the Eagleton Center on Public Interest Polling (ECPIP). Data were weighted to reflect the state's population. Participants were asked to rate how helpful they perceived different firearm-related policies to be for preventing school shootings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that participants perceived universal and expanded background checks, increased mental health funding, and requiring a license for firearm purchases as most effective for preventing school shootings. Arming school personnel, prayer in schools, decreasing the number of entrances at schools, and secure storage requirements were viewed as less effective. Firearm ownership, sex, and political affiliation significantly influenced perceptions of the effectiveness of these policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study examined the perceived effectiveness of policies to prevent school shootings. The study highlights disparities and commonalities in policy support among different groups, emphasizing the importance of collective efforts to address gun violence in schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spatial co-occurrence of firearm homicides and opioid overdose deaths in Chicago by level of COVID-19 mortality, 2017-2021. 按 COVID-19 死亡率水平分列的 2017-2021 年芝加哥枪支杀人和阿片类药物过量死亡的空间共存情况。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00515-3
Suzanne G McLone, John R Pamplin Ii, Jaii D Pappu, Jaimie L Gradus, Jonathan S Jay

Background: Firearm homicide and opioid overdoses were already leading causes of death in the U.S. before both problems surged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Firearm violence, overdoses, and COVID-19 have all disproportionately harmed communities that are socially and economically marginalized, but the co-occurrence of these problems in the same communities has received little attention. To describe the co-occurrence of firearm homicides and opioid overdose deaths with COVID-19 mortality we used 2017-2021 medical examiner's data from Chicago, IL. Deaths were assigned to zip codes based on decedents' residence. We stratified zip codes into quartiles by COVID-19 mortality rate, then compared firearm homicide and fatal opioid overdose rates by COVID-19 quartile.

Findings: Throughout the study period, firearm homicide and opioid overdose rates were highest in the highest COVID-19 mortality quartile and lowest in the lowest COVID-19 mortality quartile. Increases in firearm homicide and opioid overdose were observed across all COVID-19 mortality quartiles.

Conclusions: High co-occurrence of these deaths at the community level call for addressing the systemic forces which made them most vulnerable before the pandemic. Such strategies should consider the environments where people reside, not only where fatal injuries occur.

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行之前,持枪杀人和阿片类药物过量已经是美国的主要死因。枪支暴力、阿片类药物过量和 COVID-19 都对社会和经济边缘化的社区造成了极大的伤害,但这些问题在同一社区的同时发生却很少受到关注。为了描述枪支杀人和阿片类药物过量死亡与 COVID-19 死亡率的共同发生情况,我们使用了伊利诺伊州芝加哥市 2017-2021 年的法医数据。死亡病例根据死者的居住地分配到不同的邮政编码。我们根据 COVID-19 死亡率将邮政编码划分为四分位数,然后按 COVID-19 四分位数比较枪杀率和致命阿片类药物过量率:在整个研究期间,COVID-19 死亡率最高的四分位数的枪杀率和阿片类药物过量率最高,而 COVID-19 死亡率最低的四分位数的枪杀率和阿片类药物过量率最低。在 COVID-19 死亡率的所有四分位数中都观察到了持枪杀人和阿片类药物过量的增加:这些死亡事件在社区层面的高并发率要求解决在大流行之前使他们最易受伤害的系统性问题。此类战略应考虑人们居住的环境,而不仅仅是致命伤害发生的地方。
{"title":"Spatial co-occurrence of firearm homicides and opioid overdose deaths in Chicago by level of COVID-19 mortality, 2017-2021.","authors":"Suzanne G McLone, John R Pamplin Ii, Jaii D Pappu, Jaimie L Gradus, Jonathan S Jay","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00515-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00515-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Firearm homicide and opioid overdoses were already leading causes of death in the U.S. before both problems surged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Firearm violence, overdoses, and COVID-19 have all disproportionately harmed communities that are socially and economically marginalized, but the co-occurrence of these problems in the same communities has received little attention. To describe the co-occurrence of firearm homicides and opioid overdose deaths with COVID-19 mortality we used 2017-2021 medical examiner's data from Chicago, IL. Deaths were assigned to zip codes based on decedents' residence. We stratified zip codes into quartiles by COVID-19 mortality rate, then compared firearm homicide and fatal opioid overdose rates by COVID-19 quartile.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Throughout the study period, firearm homicide and opioid overdose rates were highest in the highest COVID-19 mortality quartile and lowest in the lowest COVID-19 mortality quartile. Increases in firearm homicide and opioid overdose were observed across all COVID-19 mortality quartiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High co-occurrence of these deaths at the community level call for addressing the systemic forces which made them most vulnerable before the pandemic. Such strategies should consider the environments where people reside, not only where fatal injuries occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining firearm-related deaths in Mexico, 2015-2022. 2015-2022 年墨西哥与枪支有关的死亡人数调查。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00519-z
Eugenio Weigend Vargas, Michelle Degli Esposti, Stephen Hargarten, Laura Vargas, Jason E Goldstick

Background: Globally, Mexico is one of six countries with the highest level of firearm mortality. While previous studies have examined firearm mortality in Mexico before 2015, increases in violence since then highlight the need for an updated analysis. In this study, we examined changes in firearm-related deaths in Mexico from 2015 to 2022 and described these deaths by key demographic groups, incident location, and state of occurrence. Data came from Mexico's Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia (INEGI), a federal agency that collects and reports national population data. We used descriptive statistics to analyze rates, proportions, and percentage changes in firearm mortality, and we displayed temporal trends using time plots and special trends using maps.

Results: Firearm deaths increased in Mexico from 2015 to 2018 but slightly decreased from 2018 to 2022. Homicides presented the highest increase and the highest proportion of firearm-related deaths from 2015 to 2022. Victims were primarily males but rates among women increased at a higher proportion (99.5% vs 53.5%). One third of victims were 20-29y but rates among children and adolescents (10-9y) increased at a higher proportion. Most firearm-related deaths occurred in streets or public spaces but the percentage of incidents occurring in households have increased. State-level rates and percentage changes varied significantly. States with higher rates of firearm mortality coincide with those involving conflict among organized criminal organizations.

Conclusion: Firearm mortality in Mexico is a major public health burden. The epidemiology of firearm-related deaths in Mexico varies by intent, demographics, location, and states. To mitigate this challenge, multiple solutions are required.

背景:在全球范围内,墨西哥是枪支死亡率最高的六个国家之一。虽然之前的研究对 2015 年之前墨西哥的枪支死亡率进行了研究,但此后暴力事件的增加凸显了更新分析的必要性。在本研究中,我们考察了 2015 年至 2022 年墨西哥与枪支有关的死亡变化,并按主要人口群体、事件发生地点和发生州对这些死亡进行了描述。数据来自墨西哥国家统计和地理研究所(INEGI),该研究所是一个收集和报告全国人口数据的联邦机构。我们使用描述性统计来分析枪支死亡率的比率、比例和百分比变化,并使用时间图显示时间趋势,使用地图显示特殊趋势:从 2015 年到 2018 年,墨西哥的枪支死亡人数有所增加,但从 2018 年到 2022 年略有下降。从 2015 年到 2022 年,凶杀案的增幅最大,在枪支相关死亡中所占比例也最高。受害者主要是男性,但女性的比例更高(99.5% vs 53.5%)。三分之一的受害者年龄在 20-29 岁之间,但儿童和青少年(10-9 岁)的比例上升较快。大多数与枪支有关的死亡事件发生在街道或公共场所,但发生在家庭中的比例有所上升。各州的死亡率和百分比变化差异很大。枪支死亡率较高的州与涉及有组织犯罪组织冲突的州相吻合:墨西哥的枪支死亡率是一个重大的公共卫生负担。墨西哥枪支相关死亡的流行病学因意图、人口、地点和州而异。为减轻这一挑战,需要采取多种解决方案。
{"title":"Examining firearm-related deaths in Mexico, 2015-2022.","authors":"Eugenio Weigend Vargas, Michelle Degli Esposti, Stephen Hargarten, Laura Vargas, Jason E Goldstick","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00519-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00519-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, Mexico is one of six countries with the highest level of firearm mortality. While previous studies have examined firearm mortality in Mexico before 2015, increases in violence since then highlight the need for an updated analysis. In this study, we examined changes in firearm-related deaths in Mexico from 2015 to 2022 and described these deaths by key demographic groups, incident location, and state of occurrence. Data came from Mexico's Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia (INEGI), a federal agency that collects and reports national population data. We used descriptive statistics to analyze rates, proportions, and percentage changes in firearm mortality, and we displayed temporal trends using time plots and special trends using maps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Firearm deaths increased in Mexico from 2015 to 2018 but slightly decreased from 2018 to 2022. Homicides presented the highest increase and the highest proportion of firearm-related deaths from 2015 to 2022. Victims were primarily males but rates among women increased at a higher proportion (99.5% vs 53.5%). One third of victims were 20-29y but rates among children and adolescents (10-9y) increased at a higher proportion. Most firearm-related deaths occurred in streets or public spaces but the percentage of incidents occurring in households have increased. State-level rates and percentage changes varied significantly. States with higher rates of firearm mortality coincide with those involving conflict among organized criminal organizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Firearm mortality in Mexico is a major public health burden. The epidemiology of firearm-related deaths in Mexico varies by intent, demographics, location, and states. To mitigate this challenge, multiple solutions are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285473/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141793685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The association between county ordinances allowing off-road vehicles on public roads and crash rates. 允许越野车在公共道路上行驶的县级法令与车祸发生率之间的关系。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00516-2
Christopher D Monson, J Priyanka Vakkalanka, Gerene M Denning, Nicholas R Stange, Charles A Jennissen

Background: Legislative bodies across the country have increasingly allowed off-road vehicles (ORVs) including all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and utility task vehicles (UTVs) on public roads, an environment for which they are not designed. In 2004, Iowa gave individual counties the discretion to pass ordinances allowing ORVs on public roadways. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the passage of ORV ordinances and ORV crash rates, especially on public roads.

Methods: An Iowa ORV roadway ordinance database and an Iowa ORV crash database (2002-2018) for all 99 counties were compiled. Crashes for which county location could not be determined were excluded. Utilizing a zero-inflated Poisson model, correcting for background crash frequency trends and population, investigators compared the relative rates of crashes after ordinance passage to time points before ordinance implementation and to counties without such ordinances. Sub-analyses, including that focused on more recent years (2008-2018), were also performed.

Results: Forty-five county ORV roadway ordinances went into effect between 2011 and 2018 and 2,347 crashes (69%) met inclusion criteria. Adjusted for year, there was a 58% greater ORV crash rate in counties after passing an ORV roadway ordinance (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.58, 95% CI 1.32-1.90). Roadway crashes (n = 834) increased 48% after ordinance passage (IRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.94). This roadway crash association remained statistically significant when analysis was limited to the years 2008-2018 (IRR 1.39, CI 1.06-1.83, n = 544); to ATV crashes only (IRR 1.70, CI 1.20-2.40, n = 683); and to ATV crashes excluding counties with UTV-only ordinances (IRR 1.74, CI 1.40-2.15, n = 2,011).

Conclusions: ORV roadway and total crashes increased significantly after implementation of county ordinances allowing ORVs on public roadways and when compared to counties without such ordinances. It is likely that these increased crashes have resulted in more injuries and possibly deaths. Results from this study may help inform policymakers as they consider legislation regarding ORV usage on public roads.

背景:全国各地的立法机构越来越多地允许越野车 (ORV) 在公共道路上行驶,包括全地形车 (ATV) 和多功能车 (UTV)。2004 年,爱荷华州允许各县酌情通过法令,允许越野车在公共道路上行驶。本研究的目的是评估 ORV 条例的通过与 ORV 碰撞率之间的关系,尤其是在公共道路上:编制了爱荷华州 ORV 道路法规数据库和爱荷华州 ORV 事故数据库(2002-2018 年),涵盖所有 99 个县。无法确定县位置的碰撞事故被排除在外。调查人员利用零膨胀泊松模型,校正了背景碰撞频率趋势和人口,比较了条例通过后与条例实施前的时间点以及未实施此类条例的县的相对碰撞率。此外,还进行了子分析,包括侧重于最近几年(2008-2018 年)的分析:在 2011 年至 2018 年期间,有 45 个县的 ORV 道路条例生效,有 2347 起碰撞事故(69%)符合纳入标准。根据年份进行调整后,通过 ORV 道路条例后的县的 ORV 碰撞率增加了 58%(发生率比 (IRR) 1.58,95% CI 1.32-1.90)。条例通过后,道路碰撞事故(n = 834)增加了 48%(IRR 1.48,95% CI 1.14-1.94)。当分析范围仅限于 2008-2018 年(IRR 1.39,CI 1.06-1.83,n = 544);仅限于全地形车(ATV)碰撞事故(IRR 1.70,CI 1.20-2.40,n = 683);以及全地形车碰撞事故(不包括仅颁布了 UTV 法规的县)(IRR 1.74,CI 1.40-2.15,n = 2,011)时,这种道路碰撞事故关联仍具有显著的统计学意义:在实施允许 ORV 在公共道路上行驶的县级法令后,与未实施此类法令的县级相比,ORV 在道路上行驶的碰撞事故和碰撞事故总数明显增加。这些增加的碰撞事故很可能导致了更多的人员伤亡。这项研究的结果可能有助于为政策制定者在考虑有关在公共道路上使用越野车的立法时提供参考。
{"title":"The association between county ordinances allowing off-road vehicles on public roads and crash rates.","authors":"Christopher D Monson, J Priyanka Vakkalanka, Gerene M Denning, Nicholas R Stange, Charles A Jennissen","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00516-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00516-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legislative bodies across the country have increasingly allowed off-road vehicles (ORVs) including all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and utility task vehicles (UTVs) on public roads, an environment for which they are not designed. In 2004, Iowa gave individual counties the discretion to pass ordinances allowing ORVs on public roadways. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the passage of ORV ordinances and ORV crash rates, especially on public roads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Iowa ORV roadway ordinance database and an Iowa ORV crash database (2002-2018) for all 99 counties were compiled. Crashes for which county location could not be determined were excluded. Utilizing a zero-inflated Poisson model, correcting for background crash frequency trends and population, investigators compared the relative rates of crashes after ordinance passage to time points before ordinance implementation and to counties without such ordinances. Sub-analyses, including that focused on more recent years (2008-2018), were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five county ORV roadway ordinances went into effect between 2011 and 2018 and 2,347 crashes (69%) met inclusion criteria. Adjusted for year, there was a 58% greater ORV crash rate in counties after passing an ORV roadway ordinance (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.58, 95% CI 1.32-1.90). Roadway crashes (n = 834) increased 48% after ordinance passage (IRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.94). This roadway crash association remained statistically significant when analysis was limited to the years 2008-2018 (IRR 1.39, CI 1.06-1.83, n = 544); to ATV crashes only (IRR 1.70, CI 1.20-2.40, n = 683); and to ATV crashes excluding counties with UTV-only ordinances (IRR 1.74, CI 1.40-2.15, n = 2,011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ORV roadway and total crashes increased significantly after implementation of county ordinances allowing ORVs on public roadways and when compared to counties without such ordinances. It is likely that these increased crashes have resulted in more injuries and possibly deaths. Results from this study may help inform policymakers as they consider legislation regarding ORV usage on public roads.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264724/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pediatric injuries and poisonings associated with detergent packets: results from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP), 2011-2023. 与洗涤剂包装相关的儿科伤害和中毒事件:2011-2023 年加拿大医院伤害报告和预防计划 (CHIRPP) 的结果。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00513-5
Sarah Zutrauen, James Cheesman, Steven R McFaull

Background: Detergent packets are common household products; however, they pose a risk of injuries and poisonings, especially among children. This study examined the epidemiological characteristics of pediatric injuries and poisonings related to all types of detergent packets in Canada using emergency department (ED) data from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) database.

Methods: The CHIRPP database was searched for ED visit records for injuries and poisonings related to all types of detergent packets between April 1, 2011 and October 12, 2023 (N = 2,021,814) using variable codes and narratives. Data for individuals aged 17 years and younger were analyzed descriptively. Temporal trends in the number of detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings per 100,000 CHIRPP cases were assessed using Joinpoint regression and annual percent change (APC). A proportion ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare the proportion of detergent packet-related cases in CHIRPP during two 34-months periods, pre-COVID-19 pandemic and after the beginning of the pandemic.

Results: There were 904 detergent packet-related cases among children and youth aged 17 years and younger identified in CHIRPP between April 1, 2011 and October 12, 2023, representing 59.9 cases per 100,000 CHIRPP cases. The majority (86.5%) of cases were among children aged 4 years and younger. Poisonings (58.8%) and eye injuries (30.6%) were the most frequent primary diagnoses. Unintentional ingestion (56.9%) and squeezing/breaking a detergent packet (32.3%) were the most frequent exposure mechanisms. Sixty-five patients (7.2%) were admitted to hospital. The number of detergent packet-related cases per 100,000 CHIRPP cases increased by 5.0% (95% CI 0.8, 10.2) annually between 2012 and 2022. The number of detergent packet-related poisonings per 100,000 CHIRPP cases decreased by 15.3% (95% CI - 22.3, - 10.6) annually between 2015 and 2022, whereas eye injuries showed an average annual percent increase of 16.6% (95% CI 11.2, 23.0) between 2012 and 2022. The proportion of detergent packet-related cases in CHIRPP after the beginning of the pandemic (79.9/100,000 CHIRPP cases) was 1.43 (95% CI 1.20, 1.71) times greater than pre-pandemic (55.7/100,000 CHIRPP cases).

Conclusions: Detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings are a persisting issue. Continued surveillance and prevention efforts are needed to reduce detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings in Canada, particularly among children and youth.

背景:洗涤剂包装袋是常见的家用产品,但它们却有造成伤害和中毒的风险,尤其是在儿童中。本研究利用加拿大医院伤害报告和预防计划(CHIRPP)数据库中的急诊科(ED)数据,研究了加拿大与各类洗涤剂包相关的儿童伤害和中毒事件的流行病学特征:使用变量代码和叙述搜索了 CHIRPP 数据库中 2011 年 4 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 12 日期间与各类洗涤剂包装袋相关的急诊室就诊记录(N = 2,021,814 例)。对 17 岁及以下人群的数据进行了描述性分析。使用 Joinpoint 回归和年度百分比变化 (APC) 评估了每 100,000 个 CHIRPP 病例中与洗涤剂包装相关的伤害和中毒数量的时间趋势。计算了比例比和 95% 的置信区间 (CI),以比较两个 34 个月期间(COVID-19 大流行前和大流行开始后)CHIRPP 中与洗涤剂包相关的病例比例:结果:2011 年 4 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 12 日期间,CHIRPP 在 17 岁及以下儿童和青少年中发现了 904 例洗涤剂包装相关病例,即每 10 万 CHIRPP 病例中有 59.9 例。大多数病例(86.5%)发生在 4 岁及以下儿童中。中毒(58.8%)和眼外伤(30.6%)是最常见的主要诊断。无意摄入(56.9%)和挤压/打破洗涤剂包装(32.3%)是最常见的接触机制。65 名患者(7.2%)入院治疗。在2012年至2022年期间,每10万例CHIRPP病例中与洗涤剂包相关的病例数每年增加5.0%(95% CI 0.8,10.2)。在2015年至2022年期间,每10万个CHIRPP病例中与洗涤剂包相关的中毒人数每年减少15.3%(95% CI - 22.3, - 10.6),而在2012年至2022年期间,眼部伤害的年均增长率为16.6%(95% CI 11.2, 23.0)。大流行开始后,CHIRPP中与洗涤剂包相关的病例比例(79.9/100,000 CHIRPP病例)是大流行前(55.7/100,000 CHIRPP病例)的1.43倍(95% CI 1.20,1.71):结论:与洗涤剂包装相关的伤害和中毒是一个长期存在的问题。需要继续开展监测和预防工作,以减少加拿大与洗涤剂包装相关的伤害和中毒事件,尤其是儿童和青少年。
{"title":"Pediatric injuries and poisonings associated with detergent packets: results from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP), 2011-2023.","authors":"Sarah Zutrauen, James Cheesman, Steven R McFaull","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00513-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00513-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Detergent packets are common household products; however, they pose a risk of injuries and poisonings, especially among children. This study examined the epidemiological characteristics of pediatric injuries and poisonings related to all types of detergent packets in Canada using emergency department (ED) data from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CHIRPP database was searched for ED visit records for injuries and poisonings related to all types of detergent packets between April 1, 2011 and October 12, 2023 (N = 2,021,814) using variable codes and narratives. Data for individuals aged 17 years and younger were analyzed descriptively. Temporal trends in the number of detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings per 100,000 CHIRPP cases were assessed using Joinpoint regression and annual percent change (APC). A proportion ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare the proportion of detergent packet-related cases in CHIRPP during two 34-months periods, pre-COVID-19 pandemic and after the beginning of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 904 detergent packet-related cases among children and youth aged 17 years and younger identified in CHIRPP between April 1, 2011 and October 12, 2023, representing 59.9 cases per 100,000 CHIRPP cases. The majority (86.5%) of cases were among children aged 4 years and younger. Poisonings (58.8%) and eye injuries (30.6%) were the most frequent primary diagnoses. Unintentional ingestion (56.9%) and squeezing/breaking a detergent packet (32.3%) were the most frequent exposure mechanisms. Sixty-five patients (7.2%) were admitted to hospital. The number of detergent packet-related cases per 100,000 CHIRPP cases increased by 5.0% (95% CI 0.8, 10.2) annually between 2012 and 2022. The number of detergent packet-related poisonings per 100,000 CHIRPP cases decreased by 15.3% (95% CI - 22.3, - 10.6) annually between 2015 and 2022, whereas eye injuries showed an average annual percent increase of 16.6% (95% CI 11.2, 23.0) between 2012 and 2022. The proportion of detergent packet-related cases in CHIRPP after the beginning of the pandemic (79.9/100,000 CHIRPP cases) was 1.43 (95% CI 1.20, 1.71) times greater than pre-pandemic (55.7/100,000 CHIRPP cases).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings are a persisting issue. Continued surveillance and prevention efforts are needed to reduce detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings in Canada, particularly among children and youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238368/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141591641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cervical vertebral and spinal cord injuries in rollover occupants. 翻车乘客的颈椎和脊髓损伤。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00506-4
Loay Al-Salehi, Shannon G Kroeker, Jason R Kerrigan, Peter A Cripton, Matthew B Panzer, Gunter P Siegmund

Background: Rollover crashes continue to be a substantial public health issue in North America. Previous research has shown that the cervical spine is the most injured spine segment in rollovers, but much of the past research has focused on risk factors rather than the actual cervical spine injuries. We sought to examine how different types of cervical spine injuries (vertebral and/or cord injury) vary with different occupant-related factors in rollovers and to compare these with non-rollovers.

Methods: We obtained crash and injury information from the National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) for 2005-2015 and Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) for 2017-2022. Based on weighted data, we calculated relative risks to assess how occupant sex, seat belt use, ejection status, and fatal outcome relate to the rate of different cervical spine injuries in rollovers and non-rollovers.

Results: In NASS-CDS occupants with cervical spine injuries (N = 111,040 weighted cases), about 91.5% experienced at least one vertebral injury whereas only 11.3% experienced a spinal cord injury (most of which had a concomitant vertebral fracture). All types of cervical spine injuries we examined were 3.4-5.2 times more likely to occur in rollovers compared to non-rollovers. These relative risks were similar for both sexes, belted and unbelted, non-ejected, and non-fatal occupants. The number of weighted CISS occupants with cervical spine injuries (N = 42,003) was smaller than in the NASS analysis, but cervical spine injuries remained 6.25 to 6.36 times more likely in rollovers compared to non-rollovers despite a more modern vehicle fleet.

Conclusions: These findings underscore the continued need for rollover-specific safety countermeasures, especially those focused on cervical spine injury prevention, and elucidate the frequency, severity and other characteristics of the specific vertebral and spinal cord injuries being sustained in rollovers. Our findings suggest that countermeasures focused on preventing cervical vertebral fractures will also effectively prevent most cervical spinal cord injuries.

背景:在北美,翻车事故仍然是一个严重的公共健康问题。以往的研究表明,颈椎是翻车事故中受伤最严重的脊柱部位,但以往的研究大多侧重于风险因素,而不是实际的颈椎损伤。我们试图研究在翻车事故中,不同类型的颈椎损伤(椎体和/或脊髓损伤)与不同的乘员相关因素有什么不同,并与非翻车事故进行比较:我们从 2005-2015 年全国汽车抽样系统-耐撞性数据系统(NASS-CDS)和 2017-2022 年碰撞调查抽样系统(CISS)中获取了碰撞和伤害信息。根据加权数据,我们计算了相对风险,以评估乘员性别、安全带使用情况、弹射状态和致命结果与翻车和非翻车中不同颈椎损伤率的关系:在NASS-CDS中颈椎受伤的乘员(N=111,040个加权病例)中,约91.5%的人至少有一处椎骨受伤,而只有11.3%的人脊髓受伤(其中大部分人同时有椎骨骨折)。与非翻车事故相比,我们所研究的各类颈椎损伤在翻车事故中发生的几率要高出3.4-5.2倍。这些相对风险对于男女、系安全带和未系安全带、未被弹出和未死亡的乘员来说都是相似的。颈椎受伤的加权CISS乘员人数(N = 42,003)少于NASS分析中的人数,但与非翻车事故相比,翻车事故中颈椎受伤的可能性仍然高出6.25至6.36倍,尽管车辆更加现代化:这些发现强调了继续采取针对翻车的安全对策的必要性,特别是那些侧重于预防颈椎损伤的对策,并阐明了翻车中特定脊椎和脊髓损伤的频率、严重程度和其他特征。我们的研究结果表明,重点预防颈椎骨折的对策也能有效预防大多数颈椎脊髓损伤。
{"title":"Cervical vertebral and spinal cord injuries in rollover occupants.","authors":"Loay Al-Salehi, Shannon G Kroeker, Jason R Kerrigan, Peter A Cripton, Matthew B Panzer, Gunter P Siegmund","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00506-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00506-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rollover crashes continue to be a substantial public health issue in North America. Previous research has shown that the cervical spine is the most injured spine segment in rollovers, but much of the past research has focused on risk factors rather than the actual cervical spine injuries. We sought to examine how different types of cervical spine injuries (vertebral and/or cord injury) vary with different occupant-related factors in rollovers and to compare these with non-rollovers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained crash and injury information from the National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) for 2005-2015 and Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) for 2017-2022. Based on weighted data, we calculated relative risks to assess how occupant sex, seat belt use, ejection status, and fatal outcome relate to the rate of different cervical spine injuries in rollovers and non-rollovers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In NASS-CDS occupants with cervical spine injuries (N = 111,040 weighted cases), about 91.5% experienced at least one vertebral injury whereas only 11.3% experienced a spinal cord injury (most of which had a concomitant vertebral fracture). All types of cervical spine injuries we examined were 3.4-5.2 times more likely to occur in rollovers compared to non-rollovers. These relative risks were similar for both sexes, belted and unbelted, non-ejected, and non-fatal occupants. The number of weighted CISS occupants with cervical spine injuries (N = 42,003) was smaller than in the NASS analysis, but cervical spine injuries remained 6.25 to 6.36 times more likely in rollovers compared to non-rollovers despite a more modern vehicle fleet.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the continued need for rollover-specific safety countermeasures, especially those focused on cervical spine injury prevention, and elucidate the frequency, severity and other characteristics of the specific vertebral and spinal cord injuries being sustained in rollovers. Our findings suggest that countermeasures focused on preventing cervical vertebral fractures will also effectively prevent most cervical spinal cord injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223401/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accuracy of the national violent death reporting system in identifying unintentional firearm deaths to children by children. 全国暴力死亡报告系统在确定儿童意外死于枪支方面的准确性。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00499-0
Samuel Fischer, Matthew Miller, Catherine Barber, Deborah Azrael

Background: In assigning manner of death (MOD) for inclusion on death certificates, medical examiners and coroners do not always apply uniform criteria. Previous research indicates surveillance statistics based on death certificates, such as the National Vital Statistics System, grossly miscount unintentional firearm deaths. The National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) has taken steps to reduce variability in manner of death coding by providing uniform criteria for assigning an "abstractor manner of death" (AMD). AMD has five categories: unintentional, suicide, homicide, undetermined, and legal intervention homicide. A previous study found good accuracy of AMD coding for unintentional firearm deaths, all ages, 2003-2006, but a more recent study reported that the NVDRS undercounted self- and other-inflicted unintentional firearm deaths in which both the victim and shooter (for other-inflicted injuries) were under age 15 (2009-2018).

Findings: We replicated the recent study's sample population, identifying 924 NVDRS incidents from 2009 to 2018 in which both victim and, for other-inflicted injuries, shooter age was under 15 and AMD was homicide, suicide, unintentional or undetermined (there were no legal intervention deaths to children). We assigned a researcher-adjudicated MOD (RMD) by reviewing incident narratives. RMD was compared with AMD and with manner recorded on the death certificate. Based on RMD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values positive and negative of the AMD for unintentional childhood firearm deaths were, respectively, 90%, 99%, 98% and 96%; 86% (24/28) of false negatives were coded by abstractors as homicides. By contrast, death certificate manner had relatively poor sensitivity (63%).

Conclusions: In our sample of 924 deaths, the abstractor manner of death generally agreed with researcher-adjudicated manner of death, though not perfectly, missing 10% of researcher-adjudicated unintentional deaths, mostly because abstractors coded these unintentional deaths as homicides. A sizable minority of false negatives were unintentional deaths where the narrative explicitly noted that adult negligence contributed to a child's unintentional shooting death. While AMD coding in NVDRS is good, it could be improved if NVDRS coding guidelines explicitly affirmed that potential prosecution for negligent manslaughter is not a contraindication to an AMD of unintentional, provided the firearm was not used to intentionally harm, threaten, or coerce.

背景:在指定死亡方式(MOD)以列入死亡证明书时,法医和验尸官并不总是采用统一的标准。以前的研究表明,基于死亡证明的监控统计数据(如国家生命统计系统)严重误计了非故意的枪支致死。全国暴力死亡报告系统(NVDRS)已采取措施,通过提供统一的 "抽取者死亡方式"(AMD)分配标准来减少死亡方式编码的差异性。AMD 有五个类别:非故意、自杀、他杀、未确定和法律干预他杀。之前的一项研究发现,2003-2006 年间所有年龄段的意外枪支死亡的 AMD 编码准确性良好,但最近的一项研究报告称,NVDRS 少计了受害者和枪手(其他伤害)年龄均在 15 岁以下的自己和他人造成的意外枪支死亡(2009-2018 年):我们复制了近期研究的样本人群,确定了 2009 年至 2018 年期间 924 起 NVDRS 事件,在这些事件中,受害者和枪手(对于其他造成的伤害)的年龄均在 15 岁以下,且 AMD 为凶杀、自杀、非蓄意或未确定(没有对儿童的法律干预死亡)。我们通过审查事件叙述,确定了研究人员判定的死亡率(RMD)。我们将RMD与AMD以及死亡证书上记录的方式进行了比较。以RMD作为金标准,AMD对儿童非故意持枪死亡的敏感性、特异性和预测值的阳性和阴性分别为90%、99%、98%和96%;86%(24/28)的假阴性被文摘员编码为凶杀。相比之下,死亡证明方式的灵敏度相对较低(63%):在我们的 924 例死亡样本中,抽样员的死亡方式与研究人员判定的死亡方式基本一致,但并不完全一致,有 10% 的研究人员判定的非故意死亡遗漏了,这主要是因为抽样员将这些非故意死亡编码为他杀。相当少数的假阴性是非故意死亡,其中的叙述明确指出成人的疏忽导致了儿童的非故意枪击死亡。虽然 NVDRS 中的 AMD 编码很好,但如果 NVDRS 的编码指南明确申明,只要枪支不是用于故意伤害、威胁或胁迫,则可能因过失杀人而被起诉并不构成非故意 AMD 的禁忌症,那么 NVDRS 的编码就可以得到改进。
{"title":"Accuracy of the national violent death reporting system in identifying unintentional firearm deaths to children by children.","authors":"Samuel Fischer, Matthew Miller, Catherine Barber, Deborah Azrael","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00499-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00499-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In assigning manner of death (MOD) for inclusion on death certificates, medical examiners and coroners do not always apply uniform criteria. Previous research indicates surveillance statistics based on death certificates, such as the National Vital Statistics System, grossly miscount unintentional firearm deaths. The National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) has taken steps to reduce variability in manner of death coding by providing uniform criteria for assigning an \"abstractor manner of death\" (AMD). AMD has five categories: unintentional, suicide, homicide, undetermined, and legal intervention homicide. A previous study found good accuracy of AMD coding for unintentional firearm deaths, all ages, 2003-2006, but a more recent study reported that the NVDRS undercounted self- and other-inflicted unintentional firearm deaths in which both the victim and shooter (for other-inflicted injuries) were under age 15 (2009-2018).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We replicated the recent study's sample population, identifying 924 NVDRS incidents from 2009 to 2018 in which both victim and, for other-inflicted injuries, shooter age was under 15 and AMD was homicide, suicide, unintentional or undetermined (there were no legal intervention deaths to children). We assigned a researcher-adjudicated MOD (RMD) by reviewing incident narratives. RMD was compared with AMD and with manner recorded on the death certificate. Based on RMD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values positive and negative of the AMD for unintentional childhood firearm deaths were, respectively, 90%, 99%, 98% and 96%; 86% (24/28) of false negatives were coded by abstractors as homicides. By contrast, death certificate manner had relatively poor sensitivity (63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our sample of 924 deaths, the abstractor manner of death generally agreed with researcher-adjudicated manner of death, though not perfectly, missing 10% of researcher-adjudicated unintentional deaths, mostly because abstractors coded these unintentional deaths as homicides. A sizable minority of false negatives were unintentional deaths where the narrative explicitly noted that adult negligence contributed to a child's unintentional shooting death. While AMD coding in NVDRS is good, it could be improved if NVDRS coding guidelines explicitly affirmed that potential prosecution for negligent manslaughter is not a contraindication to an AMD of unintentional, provided the firearm was not used to intentionally harm, threaten, or coerce.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218214/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141493757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and implementation of an injury and illness surveillance system for team USA. 为美国队开发和实施伤病监测系统。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00514-4
Eric G Post, Travis Anderson, Olivia Samson, Alexis D Gidley, Ashley N Triplett, Amber T Donaldson, Jonathan T Finnoff, William M Adams

Background: The purpose of this report is to provide insight and details regarding the development and implementation of an injury and illness surveillance (IIS) system for the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC).

Methods: The development and deployment of the IIS employed a multiphase approach. First, researchers determined variables to include in the IIS using the recommendations from the 2020 IOC consensus statement for reporting sport epidemiological data. Second, the hosting and deployment platforms were comprehensively evaluated for their suitability, ease of use, flexibility, and backend data structure (for both capture and aggregation). Third, focus groups consisting of the Sports Medicine department leadership and clinicians piloted the IIS system and revisions were made based on their feedback. Pilot testing of the IIS and follow-up focus groups were then conducted among all departmental clinicians to solicit additional feedback and drive further revisions. Finally, the IIS system was piloted among providers working during the 2023 Pan American and Parapan American Games to refine the system for future Games. After reviewing all potential software platform options (electronic medical record [EMR] system, athlete management systems, secure data collection platforms), Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA) was selected to host the IIS system. This choice was made due to the inability of the EMR and athlete-management systems to make frequent updates, modify existing questions, and provide the necessary form logic for the variety of scenarios in which the IIS system would be deployed. Feedback from the department's leadership and clinicians resulted in a number of changes, most notably being the ability to enter multiple diagnoses for a single injury event. Additionally, clinician feedback resulted in the creation of additional diagnostic codes not currently present in the OSIICS v14.0 diagnostic coding system, adding "non-sport" as an additional variable for injury setting, and developing a system for reporting return-to-sport date for time-loss injuries.

Discussion: A multi-stage process of extensive planning, stakeholder feedback, and ongoing updates is required in order to successfully develop and implement an IIS system within a National Olympic and Paralynpic Committee. This process can be used to inform the development and implementation of IIS systems in other sporting organizations.

背景:本报告旨在提供有关美国奥林匹克委员会和残疾人奥林匹克委员会(USOPC)开发和实施伤病监测系统(IIS)的见解和细节:方法:IIS 的开发和部署采用了多阶段方法。首先,研究人员根据 2020 年国际奥委会关于报告体育流行病学数据的共识声明中的建议,确定 IIS 中应包含的变量。其次,对托管和部署平台的适用性、易用性、灵活性和后台数据结构(采集和汇总)进行了全面评估。第三,由运动医学部门领导和临床医生组成的重点小组对 IIS 系统进行了试用,并根据他们的反馈意见进行了修改。然后,对 IIS 系统进行了试点测试,并在所有科室临床医生中开展了后续焦点小组活动,以征求更多反馈意见并推动进一步修订。最后,在 2023 年泛美和泛亚运动会期间,在医疗服务提供者中试用了 IIS 系统,以便为今后的运动会改进系统。在对所有潜在的软件平台选择(电子病历系统、运动员管理系统、安全数据收集平台)进行审查后,我们选择了 Qualtrics(Qualtrics,美国犹他州普罗沃市)作为 IIS 系统的主机。做出这一选择的原因是,EMR 和运动员管理系统无法频繁更新、修改现有问题,也无法为 IIS 系统的各种部署方案提供必要的表单逻辑。该部门领导和临床医生的反馈意见带来了许多变化,其中最显著的变化是可以为一次受伤事件输入多个诊断。此外,根据临床医生的反馈意见,还增加了一些目前在 OSIICS v14.0 诊断编码系统中没有的诊断代码,增加了 "非运动 "作为受伤环境的额外变量,并开发了一个报告时间损失性伤害恢复运动日期的系统:要在国家奥林匹克和瘫痪病人委员会内成功开发和实施 IIS 系统,需要经过广泛规划、利益相关者反馈和持续更新等多阶段过程。这一过程可为其他体育组织开发和实施 IIS 系统提供参考。
{"title":"Development and implementation of an injury and illness surveillance system for team USA.","authors":"Eric G Post, Travis Anderson, Olivia Samson, Alexis D Gidley, Ashley N Triplett, Amber T Donaldson, Jonathan T Finnoff, William M Adams","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00514-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00514-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this report is to provide insight and details regarding the development and implementation of an injury and illness surveillance (IIS) system for the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development and deployment of the IIS employed a multiphase approach. First, researchers determined variables to include in the IIS using the recommendations from the 2020 IOC consensus statement for reporting sport epidemiological data. Second, the hosting and deployment platforms were comprehensively evaluated for their suitability, ease of use, flexibility, and backend data structure (for both capture and aggregation). Third, focus groups consisting of the Sports Medicine department leadership and clinicians piloted the IIS system and revisions were made based on their feedback. Pilot testing of the IIS and follow-up focus groups were then conducted among all departmental clinicians to solicit additional feedback and drive further revisions. Finally, the IIS system was piloted among providers working during the 2023 Pan American and Parapan American Games to refine the system for future Games. After reviewing all potential software platform options (electronic medical record [EMR] system, athlete management systems, secure data collection platforms), Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA) was selected to host the IIS system. This choice was made due to the inability of the EMR and athlete-management systems to make frequent updates, modify existing questions, and provide the necessary form logic for the variety of scenarios in which the IIS system would be deployed. Feedback from the department's leadership and clinicians resulted in a number of changes, most notably being the ability to enter multiple diagnoses for a single injury event. Additionally, clinician feedback resulted in the creation of additional diagnostic codes not currently present in the OSIICS v14.0 diagnostic coding system, adding \"non-sport\" as an additional variable for injury setting, and developing a system for reporting return-to-sport date for time-loss injuries.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A multi-stage process of extensive planning, stakeholder feedback, and ongoing updates is required in order to successfully develop and implement an IIS system within a National Olympic and Paralynpic Committee. This process can be used to inform the development and implementation of IIS systems in other sporting organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218168/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141477635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unintentional injury prevention in American Indian and Alaska Native communities: a scoping review of the Indian Health Service Primary Care Provider newsletter. 美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区的意外伤害预防:印第安人健康服务初级保健提供者通讯的范围界定审查。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00509-1
Wendy Shields, Anne Kenney, Evelyn Shiang, Rebecca Malizia, Holly Billie

Background: Unintentional injuries disproportionately impact American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations. Developing effective and culturally tailored data collection and intervention programs requires an understanding of past prevention efforts in AI/AN communities, but limited peer-reviewed literature on the topic is available. This scoping review aims to summarize efforts that have been published in the Primary Care Provider newsletter, a source of gray literature available through the Indian Health Service.

Methods: The research team obtained all injury related articles in the Provider newsletter and excluded those that did not describe an unintentional injury prevention effort. Included articles were organized chronologically and by topic, and outcomes were described in a data abstraction form.

Results: A total of 247 articles from the Provider newsletter were screened, and 68 were included in this review. The most number of articles were published in 2007 (n = 15). Many focused not specifically on one tribal community but on the AI/AN community as a whole (n = 27), while others reported that certain tribes were the focus of study but did not identify tribes by name (n = 24). The following is a list of 14 tribal communities explicitly mentioned: Omaha, Cherokee, Ute, Yakama, Chippewa, Apache, Ho-Chunk, The Crow Tribe, Tohono O'odham Nation, Fort Mojave Tribe, Chemehuevi Tribe, The Rosebud Tribe, Navajo, and The Pueblo of Jemez. Published unintentional injury prevention efforts have covered the following 7 topics in AI/AN communities: falls, motor vehicle crashes, poisonings, improving data, burns, children, and other.

Conclusion: This scoping review makes available and searchable information on injury prevention work conducted in and for AI/AN communities that is not currently found in the peer-reviewed literature.

背景:意外伤害对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)的影响尤为严重。要制定有效且符合当地文化的数据收集和干预计划,就必须了解美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区过去所做的预防工作,但有关该主题的同行评议文献十分有限。本范围综述旨在总结发表在《初级保健提供者通讯》上的工作,该通讯是通过印第安人卫生服务机构获得的灰色文献来源:研究小组从 "提供者 "通讯中获取了所有与伤害相关的文章,并排除了那些没有描述意外伤害预防工作的文章。纳入的文章按时间顺序和主题进行整理,并在数据摘要表中对结果进行描述:结果:共筛选出 247 篇来自 "提供商 "通讯的文章,其中 68 篇被纳入本综述。2007 年发表的文章数量最多(n = 15)。许多文章的重点不是某个部落社区,而是整个 AI/AN 社区(n = 27),还有一些文章称某些部落是研究重点,但没有指明部落名称(n = 24)。以下是明确提到的 14 个部落社区的名单:奥马哈部落、切诺基部落、尤特部落、雅卡玛部落、奇佩瓦部落、阿帕奇部落、霍-钱克部落、乌鸦部落、托霍诺-奥德汉姆部落、莫哈韦堡部落、切梅赫维部落、罗斯布德部落、纳瓦霍部落和杰梅斯普韦布洛部落。已发表的意外伤害预防工作涉及美国印第安人/美洲印第安人社区的以下 7 个主题:跌倒、机动车碰撞、中毒、改进数据、烧伤、儿童及其他:本范围审查提供了有关在阿拉斯加原住民/印第安人社区开展的伤害预防工作的可搜索信息,这些信息目前在同行评审文献中尚未发现。
{"title":"Unintentional injury prevention in American Indian and Alaska Native communities: a scoping review of the Indian Health Service Primary Care Provider newsletter.","authors":"Wendy Shields, Anne Kenney, Evelyn Shiang, Rebecca Malizia, Holly Billie","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00509-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00509-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unintentional injuries disproportionately impact American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations. Developing effective and culturally tailored data collection and intervention programs requires an understanding of past prevention efforts in AI/AN communities, but limited peer-reviewed literature on the topic is available. This scoping review aims to summarize efforts that have been published in the Primary Care Provider newsletter, a source of gray literature available through the Indian Health Service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research team obtained all injury related articles in the Provider newsletter and excluded those that did not describe an unintentional injury prevention effort. Included articles were organized chronologically and by topic, and outcomes were described in a data abstraction form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 articles from the Provider newsletter were screened, and 68 were included in this review. The most number of articles were published in 2007 (n = 15). Many focused not specifically on one tribal community but on the AI/AN community as a whole (n = 27), while others reported that certain tribes were the focus of study but did not identify tribes by name (n = 24). The following is a list of 14 tribal communities explicitly mentioned: Omaha, Cherokee, Ute, Yakama, Chippewa, Apache, Ho-Chunk, The Crow Tribe, Tohono O'odham Nation, Fort Mojave Tribe, Chemehuevi Tribe, The Rosebud Tribe, Navajo, and The Pueblo of Jemez. Published unintentional injury prevention efforts have covered the following 7 topics in AI/AN communities: falls, motor vehicle crashes, poisonings, improving data, burns, children, and other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review makes available and searchable information on injury prevention work conducted in and for AI/AN communities that is not currently found in the peer-reviewed literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197249/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Engaging suicide prevention and firearm stakeholders in developing a workshop promoting secure firearm storage for suicide prevention. 让预防自杀和枪支方面的利益相关者参与制定促进安全枪支储存以预防自杀的研讨会。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00511-7
Hanna Christian, Dev Crasta, Garra Lloyd-Lester, Gala True, Marianne Goodman, Brett Bass, Kathryne Coric, Timothy Ruetten, Robert Lane, Gabriela Khazanov

Background: In the US, over 50% of suicide deaths are by firearm injury. Studies have found that limiting access to firearms, including storing them temporarily outside of the home or locking and unloading them securely at home, helps prevent suicide. Family members and other loved ones are in a unique position to encourage secure firearm storage. This paper describes the development of a workshop to empower loved ones of individuals at risk for suicide to discuss secure firearm storage in New York State.

Methods: Using a multistakeholder engagement framework, we partnered with New York State county-level suicide prevention coalitions, local firearms experts, and other stakeholders to develop a 90-min workshop addressing secure firearm storage for suicide prevention. Pilot workshops were co-facilitated by a suicide prevention coalition member and a local firearms expert. Feedback gathered via surveys from workshop attendees and interviews with workshop co-facilitators were used to revise workshop content and inform dissemination. Following pilot workshops, a 1-day training event was held for potential future facilitators, and survey data were collected to assess trainee experiences and interest in facilitating future workshops. Data analysis included rapid qualitative analysis of interviews and statistical analysis of survey responses about acceptability of workshop.

Results: Four pilot workshops included a total of 23 attendees. Pilot workshop attendees endorsed willingness and confidence to discuss secure firearm storage with a family member or loved one. The training event included 42 attendees, of which 26 indicated interest in facilitating a workshop within the next year. Co-facilitators agreed on several key themes, including the importance of having a "trusted messenger" deliver the firearms portion of the workshop, keeping the conversation focused on firearm safety for suicide prevention, and developing interventions that reflect firearm owning community's culture.

Conclusions: Consistent with a public health approach to suicide prevention, this study leveraged a multistakeholder engagement framework to develop a community-based workshop empowering loved ones of individuals at risk for suicide to discuss secure firearm storage. The workshop will be disseminated across New York State. We noted positive and collaborative relationships across stakeholder groups, and willingness to facilitate the workshop among both suicide prevention and firearm stakeholders.

背景:在美国,50% 以上的自杀死亡是死于枪支伤害。研究发现,限制接触枪支,包括将枪支暂时存放在室外或在家中安全上锁和卸载,有助于预防自杀。家庭成员和其他亲人在鼓励安全存放枪支方面具有独特的优势。本文介绍了纽约州为使有自杀风险者的亲人有能力讨论枪支安全存放问题而举办的研讨会:我们采用多利益相关者参与框架,与纽约州县级自杀预防联盟、当地枪支专家和其他利益相关者合作,开发了一个 90 分钟的研讨会,讨论如何安全存放枪支以预防自杀。试点研讨会由一名自杀预防联盟成员和一名当地枪支专家共同主持。通过对研讨会参加者的调查和对研讨会共同主持人的访谈收集到的反馈意见被用于修订研讨会内容和宣传。试点研讨会结束后,为潜在的未来主持人举办了为期一天的培训活动,并收集了调查数据,以评估受训者的经验和对未来研讨会主持人的兴趣。数据分析包括对访谈的快速定性分析和对研讨会可接受性调查反馈的统计分析:四次试点研讨会共有 23 人参加。试点研讨会的参加者表示愿意并有信心与家人或爱人讨论枪支的安全存放问题。培训活动共有 42 人参加,其中 26 人表示有兴趣在明年再举办一次研讨会。共同主持人就几个关键主题达成了一致意见,包括由 "值得信赖的信使 "负责讲授研讨会中的枪支部分、将谈话重点放在预防自杀的枪支安全上以及制定反映枪支所有者社区文化的干预措施的重要性:与预防自杀的公共卫生方法一致,本研究利用多方利益相关者参与的框架,开发了一个基于社区的研讨会,让有自杀风险的人的亲人有能力讨论枪支的安全存放问题。该研讨会将在整个纽约州推广。我们注意到各利益相关者团体之间积极的合作关系,以及预防自杀和枪支利益相关者促进研讨会的意愿。
{"title":"Engaging suicide prevention and firearm stakeholders in developing a workshop promoting secure firearm storage for suicide prevention.","authors":"Hanna Christian, Dev Crasta, Garra Lloyd-Lester, Gala True, Marianne Goodman, Brett Bass, Kathryne Coric, Timothy Ruetten, Robert Lane, Gabriela Khazanov","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00511-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-024-00511-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the US, over 50% of suicide deaths are by firearm injury. Studies have found that limiting access to firearms, including storing them temporarily outside of the home or locking and unloading them securely at home, helps prevent suicide. Family members and other loved ones are in a unique position to encourage secure firearm storage. This paper describes the development of a workshop to empower loved ones of individuals at risk for suicide to discuss secure firearm storage in New York State.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a multistakeholder engagement framework, we partnered with New York State county-level suicide prevention coalitions, local firearms experts, and other stakeholders to develop a 90-min workshop addressing secure firearm storage for suicide prevention. Pilot workshops were co-facilitated by a suicide prevention coalition member and a local firearms expert. Feedback gathered via surveys from workshop attendees and interviews with workshop co-facilitators were used to revise workshop content and inform dissemination. Following pilot workshops, a 1-day training event was held for potential future facilitators, and survey data were collected to assess trainee experiences and interest in facilitating future workshops. Data analysis included rapid qualitative analysis of interviews and statistical analysis of survey responses about acceptability of workshop.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four pilot workshops included a total of 23 attendees. Pilot workshop attendees endorsed willingness and confidence to discuss secure firearm storage with a family member or loved one. The training event included 42 attendees, of which 26 indicated interest in facilitating a workshop within the next year. Co-facilitators agreed on several key themes, including the importance of having a \"trusted messenger\" deliver the firearms portion of the workshop, keeping the conversation focused on firearm safety for suicide prevention, and developing interventions that reflect firearm owning community's culture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with a public health approach to suicide prevention, this study leveraged a multistakeholder engagement framework to develop a community-based workshop empowering loved ones of individuals at risk for suicide to discuss secure firearm storage. The workshop will be disseminated across New York State. We noted positive and collaborative relationships across stakeholder groups, and willingness to facilitate the workshop among both suicide prevention and firearm stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179275/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141321758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Injury Epidemiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1