Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1186/s40621-026-00655-8
Julie A Ward, Rebecca A Valek, Vanya C Jones, Lilliana Mason, Cassandra K Crifasi
Background: Reasons for gun ownership have shifted from primarily for hunting, to protection from other people, and increasingly for concerns about political violence. In 2023, these reasons differed by party affiliation. In the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election, the objective of this study was to compare gun owners' reasons for gun ownership in January 2025 vs. 2023, overall and by political party affiliation.
Methods: We analyzed two waves of gun owning respondents to the National Survey of Gun Policy (n = 2,003). In both waves, fielded 1/4/23 - 2/6/23 and 1/6/25 - 1/24/25, respondents identified personally important reasons for gun ownership from 10 potential reasons (e.g., at-home protection, out-of-home protection, protection from police, ideological conflict, hunting or recreation). We calculated weighted proportions to generate nationally representative estimates and compared reasons for gun ownership in 2025 to 2023 overall and by political affiliation (i.e., Republican, Democrat, or Independent).
Results: In 2025 (vs. 2023), more gun owners valued gun ownership "for protection at demonstrations, rallies, or protests" (42% vs. 35%) and for hunting (81% vs. 74%), but fewer valued ownership "to advance an important political objective" (22% vs. 35%). Increases were largely driven by Republican gun owners, who also rated higher at-home protection (97% vs. 93%) and protection against police violence (34% vs. 25%). Fewer Republican, Democrat, and Independent gun owners valued ownership "to advance an important political objective."
Conclusions: As political violence escalated nationally, larger portions of gun owners rejected such violence, while also seeking to protect themselves from it. Safety and policy implications are discussed.
{"title":"Gun ownership for political protection or armed political expression: a nationally representative analysis of differences in 2025 vs. 2023.","authors":"Julie A Ward, Rebecca A Valek, Vanya C Jones, Lilliana Mason, Cassandra K Crifasi","doi":"10.1186/s40621-026-00655-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-026-00655-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reasons for gun ownership have shifted from primarily for hunting, to protection from other people, and increasingly for concerns about political violence. In 2023, these reasons differed by party affiliation. In the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election, the objective of this study was to compare gun owners' reasons for gun ownership in January 2025 vs. 2023, overall and by political party affiliation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed two waves of gun owning respondents to the National Survey of Gun Policy (n = 2,003). In both waves, fielded 1/4/23 - 2/6/23 and 1/6/25 - 1/24/25, respondents identified personally important reasons for gun ownership from 10 potential reasons (e.g., at-home protection, out-of-home protection, protection from police, ideological conflict, hunting or recreation). We calculated weighted proportions to generate nationally representative estimates and compared reasons for gun ownership in 2025 to 2023 overall and by political affiliation (i.e., Republican, Democrat, or Independent).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2025 (vs. 2023), more gun owners valued gun ownership \"for protection at demonstrations, rallies, or protests\" (42% vs. 35%) and for hunting (81% vs. 74%), but fewer valued ownership \"to advance an important political objective\" (22% vs. 35%). Increases were largely driven by Republican gun owners, who also rated higher at-home protection (97% vs. 93%) and protection against police violence (34% vs. 25%). Fewer Republican, Democrat, and Independent gun owners valued ownership \"to advance an important political objective.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As political violence escalated nationally, larger portions of gun owners rejected such violence, while also seeking to protect themselves from it. Safety and policy implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12895625/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00651-4
Ali Işın, Amy E Peden
Globally in 2021, for the first time, the unintentional drowning fatality rate among people aged 70 years and older (8.15 per 100,000 people) surpassed the drowning rate of children under five years (7.66 per 100,000 people). While strong investment and advocacy in child drowning prevention have proven effective, we currently lack the research, consensus-based risk factors, and age-specific drowning prevention interventions for older people. Amid a globally aging population, we use this comment to highlight the need for increased evidence to reduce the persistent yet preventable fatal drowning rate for this age group.
{"title":"Drowning among older people: a neglected yet vital component of global drowning prevention.","authors":"Ali Işın, Amy E Peden","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00651-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00651-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally in 2021, for the first time, the unintentional drowning fatality rate among people aged 70 years and older (8.15 per 100,000 people) surpassed the drowning rate of children under five years (7.66 per 100,000 people). While strong investment and advocacy in child drowning prevention have proven effective, we currently lack the research, consensus-based risk factors, and age-specific drowning prevention interventions for older people. Amid a globally aging population, we use this comment to highlight the need for increased evidence to reduce the persistent yet preventable fatal drowning rate for this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802321/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00643-4
Alejandra Camacho-Soto, Irene M Faust, Brittany Krzyzanowski, Jordan A Killion, Kassu M Beyene, Edward F Ellerbeck, Jacob J Sosnoff, Brad A Racette
Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, characterized by both motor and non-motor symptoms. Falls and fractures are common in advanced PD but the risk of fractures in newly diagnosed people with PD and the impact of treatment with levodopa is understudied.
Methods: We investigated the risk of fractures among Medicare beneficiaries with incident PD age ≥ 67 compared to controls. Among PD cases only with continuous Part D medication coverage, we examined the effect of levodopa treatment on fracture risk. We identified incident PD cases (N = 68,150) within a population-based sample of 2017 Medicare beneficiaries. Controls (N = 272,600) were matched 4:1 on age, sex, and month/year of the date of PD diagnosis. We used claims data from 2017-2019 to follow cases and controls to identify new fractures. Our primary outcome was any fracture. We classified fractures secondarily by body region (spine/vertebral, torso, pelvis, upper extremity, lower extremity [and separately hip]). We used competing risks regression models to estimate subhazard ratios (SHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between fracture and PD after adjusting for covariates. Among PD cases with continuous medication coverage (N = 61,317), we examined the effect of levodopa treatment in PD cases ever prescribed levodopa for 90 days (≥ 1 prescription fill).
Results: Following PD diagnosis/control reference date, the most common fracture location in incident PD cases and controls was in the hip, followed by the spine. PD cases had a greater risk of any fracture in all body regions compared to controls at any given time: any fracture (SHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39), spine (SHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.35-1.59), hip (SHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30-1.44), and upper extremity (SHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.22-1.48). PD cases who used levodopa for 90 days had a lower risk of any fracture (SHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81) than those without treatment. This was also true for individual fracture types in all body regions with the exception of the torso and pelvis.
Conclusion: Medicare beneficiaries with incident PD have a greater risk of fracture in all body regions compared to controls and this risk may be reduced with levodopa use.
背景:帕金森病(PD)是第二常见的神经退行性疾病,以运动和非运动症状为特征。跌倒和骨折在晚期PD中很常见,但新诊断的PD患者骨折的风险和左旋多巴治疗的影响尚未得到充分研究。方法:与对照组相比,我们调查了年龄≥67岁的PD患者发生骨折的风险。在PD患者中,我们研究了左旋多巴治疗对骨折风险的影响。我们在2017年医疗保险受益人的人群样本中确定了PD事件病例(N = 68,150)。对照(N = 272,600)按年龄、性别和PD诊断日期的月份/年份按4:1匹配。我们使用2017-2019年的索赔数据来跟踪病例和对照,以确定新的骨折。我们的主要结果是骨折。我们根据身体部位(脊柱/椎体、躯干、骨盆、上肢、下肢[以及单独的髋关节])对骨折进行了分类。在调整协变量后,我们使用竞争风险回归模型来估计骨折与PD之间关联的亚危险比(SHR)和95%置信区间(CI)。在持续用药覆盖的PD患者中(N = 61,317),我们检查了曾服用左旋多巴90天(≥1个处方)的PD患者左旋多巴治疗效果。结果:在PD诊断/对照参考日期后,偶发PD病例和对照组中最常见的骨折部位是髋关节,其次是脊柱。与对照组相比,PD患者在任何给定时间发生所有身体部位骨折的风险都更高:任何骨折(SHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39)、脊柱(SHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.35-1.59)、髋部(SHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30-1.44)和上肢(SHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.22-1.48)。左旋多巴治疗90天的PD患者发生骨折的风险低于未治疗的患者(SHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81)。除躯干和骨盆外,所有身体部位的个体骨折类型也是如此。结论:与对照组相比,发生PD的医疗保险受益人在所有身体区域都有更大的骨折风险,使用左旋多巴可以降低这种风险。
{"title":"Excess risk of fracture in incident Parkinson's disease Medicare beneficiaries.","authors":"Alejandra Camacho-Soto, Irene M Faust, Brittany Krzyzanowski, Jordan A Killion, Kassu M Beyene, Edward F Ellerbeck, Jacob J Sosnoff, Brad A Racette","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00643-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00643-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, characterized by both motor and non-motor symptoms. Falls and fractures are common in advanced PD but the risk of fractures in newly diagnosed people with PD and the impact of treatment with levodopa is understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the risk of fractures among Medicare beneficiaries with incident PD age ≥ 67 compared to controls. Among PD cases only with continuous Part D medication coverage, we examined the effect of levodopa treatment on fracture risk. We identified incident PD cases (N = 68,150) within a population-based sample of 2017 Medicare beneficiaries. Controls (N = 272,600) were matched 4:1 on age, sex, and month/year of the date of PD diagnosis. We used claims data from 2017-2019 to follow cases and controls to identify new fractures. Our primary outcome was any fracture. We classified fractures secondarily by body region (spine/vertebral, torso, pelvis, upper extremity, lower extremity [and separately hip]). We used competing risks regression models to estimate subhazard ratios (SHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between fracture and PD after adjusting for covariates. Among PD cases with continuous medication coverage (N = 61,317), we examined the effect of levodopa treatment in PD cases ever prescribed levodopa for 90 days (≥ 1 prescription fill).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following PD diagnosis/control reference date, the most common fracture location in incident PD cases and controls was in the hip, followed by the spine. PD cases had a greater risk of any fracture in all body regions compared to controls at any given time: any fracture (SHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39), spine (SHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.35-1.59), hip (SHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30-1.44), and upper extremity (SHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.22-1.48). PD cases who used levodopa for 90 days had a lower risk of any fracture (SHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81) than those without treatment. This was also true for individual fracture types in all body regions with the exception of the torso and pelvis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries with incident PD have a greater risk of fracture in all body regions compared to controls and this risk may be reduced with levodopa use.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12797354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00650-5
Elizabeth C Metzger, Douglas J Wiebe, Abigail C Bretzin, Adam Roby, Elizabeth J Allan, Lindsay M Orchowski, Cristóbal S Berry-Cabán
Background: Hazing-defined as an act that is required to gain entry into a group and humiliates, degrades, abuses, endangers, or otherwise embarrasses an individual, irrespective of willingness of the person-is a persistent problem in the United States (US) military, and can manifest in physical and emotional harm, and in extreme circumstances, death. However, the presentation of hazing, including the exact experiences and resulting outcomes is scarcely studied, leaving a gap in understanding and a need to specifically investigate this issue.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by administering a survey with questions about hazing experiences and outcomes to 227 service members at a military installation in the Southeast United States over 14 months. Frequency of hazing experiences and outcomes were derived. To understand how the large number of variables related to each other, a cluster analysis provided Jaccard measures of similarities amongst experience variables. Logistic regressions were conducted to test the association between the experiences and outcomes of hazing.
Results: A total of 227 service members answered the survey; the final cleaned sample resulted in 202 participants who were primarily active-duty (94.0%), in the Army (95.6%), enlisted rank (E1-E4; 58.5%), male (69.6%), and white (49.4%). Almost one-fifth (19.8%) of the participants endorsed experiencing hazing at the installation, and over a fifth endorsed experiencing hazing in the form of sexual violence (22.4%), being tricked (27.8%), and acting like a servant (22.3%). Hazing experiences were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with greater odds of several types of negative physical (ORs ranging from 2.8 to 15.9) and mental health outcomes (ORs ranging from 4.7 to 68.0) and multiple effects on the organization, such as desire to leave the military (ORs ranging from 2.9 to 34.1), since arriving at the current military location.
Conclusions: Hazing manifests in various manners and results in harmful consequences for both individuals and the organization. The present study provides an understanding of hazing through descriptive epidemiology, which can help both leaders and practitioners address the issue.
{"title":"Exploring hazing experiences and perceived physical and mental health outcomes in the United States military through a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Elizabeth C Metzger, Douglas J Wiebe, Abigail C Bretzin, Adam Roby, Elizabeth J Allan, Lindsay M Orchowski, Cristóbal S Berry-Cabán","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00650-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00650-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hazing-defined as an act that is required to gain entry into a group and humiliates, degrades, abuses, endangers, or otherwise embarrasses an individual, irrespective of willingness of the person-is a persistent problem in the United States (US) military, and can manifest in physical and emotional harm, and in extreme circumstances, death. However, the presentation of hazing, including the exact experiences and resulting outcomes is scarcely studied, leaving a gap in understanding and a need to specifically investigate this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted by administering a survey with questions about hazing experiences and outcomes to 227 service members at a military installation in the Southeast United States over 14 months. Frequency of hazing experiences and outcomes were derived. To understand how the large number of variables related to each other, a cluster analysis provided Jaccard measures of similarities amongst experience variables. Logistic regressions were conducted to test the association between the experiences and outcomes of hazing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 227 service members answered the survey; the final cleaned sample resulted in 202 participants who were primarily active-duty (94.0%), in the Army (95.6%), enlisted rank (E1-E4; 58.5%), male (69.6%), and white (49.4%). Almost one-fifth (19.8%) of the participants endorsed experiencing hazing at the installation, and over a fifth endorsed experiencing hazing in the form of sexual violence (22.4%), being tricked (27.8%), and acting like a servant (22.3%). Hazing experiences were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with greater odds of several types of negative physical (ORs ranging from 2.8 to 15.9) and mental health outcomes (ORs ranging from 4.7 to 68.0) and multiple effects on the organization, such as desire to leave the military (ORs ranging from 2.9 to 34.1), since arriving at the current military location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hazing manifests in various manners and results in harmful consequences for both individuals and the organization. The present study provides an understanding of hazing through descriptive epidemiology, which can help both leaders and practitioners address the issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12888155/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00653-2
David Hemenway, Matthew Miller, Ezra Mason, Samuel Fischer, Deborah Azrael
Background: This study provides a contemporary estimate of how many adult US gun owners had a gun stolen in the past five years, along with information about the demographic and gun-related characteristics of these victims.
Methods: Data come from the 2024 National Firearms Survey, designed by the authors and conducted by the research firm Ipsos in December 2024. Close to 13,000 (n = 12,860) of those invited to take this on-line survey completed it (59% completion rate). Respondents who reported that they personally owned a gun (n = 4059) were asked "In the past 5 years, have you had any firearms stolen from you?" Respondents who answered in the affirmative were asked detailed questions about their most recent gun theft incident that occurred in the past five years. Data were weighted to provide national estimates.
Results: Among the 4,059 gun owners in the study, 47 reported having had one or more guns stolen in the past five years, representing a weighted estimate of 1.4% (95% CI 0.9, 1.8) of gun owners, or approximately 1 million adults. Gun owners who had carried a handgun in the month prior to the survey were three times more likely to report having a gun stolen than those who had not carried (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.1, 7.4). Gun owners who stored a gun in their car (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4, 9.2), and those who stored some of their guns loaded and unlocked compared to owners who stored all their guns unloaded and locked (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4, 9.6) were also three times more likely to have a gun stolen. Three fifths (60%) of the most recent gun theft incidents reported by respondents occurred in the victim's home. An additional 15% were from cars, and 25% from all other places. In about a quarter of these thefts (28%), at least one gun had been recovered by the time of the survey. Two-thirds (68%) of respondents reported their most recent gun theft to police (over 80% of non-Hispanic White gun owners compared to about half of other gun owners). One quarter of these theft victims had insurance that covered the firearm.
Conclusion: Gun carrying, keeping a gun in one's car, and storing guns loaded and unlocked may increase harm to the community by increasing the number of guns that get into the hands of criminals.
背景:本研究提供了在过去五年中有多少美国成年枪支拥有者枪支被盗的当代估计,以及这些受害者的人口统计学和枪支相关特征的信息。方法:数据来自2024年全国枪支调查,该调查由作者设计,由研究公司益普索于2024年12月进行。近13,000 (n = 12,860)被邀请参加这项在线调查的人完成了调查(完成率59%)。自称个人拥有枪支的受访者(n = 4059)被问及“在过去5年里,你是否有枪支被盗?”回答“肯定”的受访者被问及过去五年内发生的最近一次枪支盗窃事件的详细问题。对数据进行加权以提供国家估计。结果:在研究的4059名枪支拥有者中,47人报告在过去五年中有一支或多支枪支被盗,代表了1.4%的枪支拥有者(95% CI 0.9, 1.8),或大约100万成年人。在调查前一个月携带手枪的枪支拥有者报告枪支被盗的可能性是未携带枪支的人的三倍(OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.1, 7.4)。将枪存放在车里(OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4, 9.2),以及将部分上膛且未上锁的枪存放在车里(OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4, 9.6)的枪支所有者,与将所有未上膛且未上锁的枪存放在车里(OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4, 9.6)的枪支被盗的可能性是前者的三倍。受访者报告的最近枪支盗窃事件中有五分之三(60%)发生在受害者家中。另外15%来自汽车,25%来自其他地方。在大约四分之一(28%)的盗窃案中,至少有一支枪在调查期间被追回。三分之二(68%)的受访者向警方报告了他们最近的枪支盗窃案(超过80%的非西班牙裔白人枪支拥有者与其他枪支拥有者的约一半相比)。四分之一的被盗受害者有枪支保险。结论:携带枪支,把枪放在自己的车里,储存上膛和未上锁的枪支可能会增加枪支进入罪犯手中的数量,从而增加对社区的伤害。
{"title":"Gun theft from private citizens in the US 2020-2024: victims and circumstances from a national survey.","authors":"David Hemenway, Matthew Miller, Ezra Mason, Samuel Fischer, Deborah Azrael","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00653-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00653-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study provides a contemporary estimate of how many adult US gun owners had a gun stolen in the past five years, along with information about the demographic and gun-related characteristics of these victims.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data come from the 2024 National Firearms Survey, designed by the authors and conducted by the research firm Ipsos in December 2024. Close to 13,000 (n = 12,860) of those invited to take this on-line survey completed it (59% completion rate). Respondents who reported that they personally owned a gun (n = 4059) were asked \"In the past 5 years, have you had any firearms stolen from you?\" Respondents who answered in the affirmative were asked detailed questions about their most recent gun theft incident that occurred in the past five years. Data were weighted to provide national estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 4,059 gun owners in the study, 47 reported having had one or more guns stolen in the past five years, representing a weighted estimate of 1.4% (95% CI 0.9, 1.8) of gun owners, or approximately 1 million adults. Gun owners who had carried a handgun in the month prior to the survey were three times more likely to report having a gun stolen than those who had not carried (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.1, 7.4). Gun owners who stored a gun in their car (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4, 9.2), and those who stored some of their guns loaded and unlocked compared to owners who stored all their guns unloaded and locked (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4, 9.6) were also three times more likely to have a gun stolen. Three fifths (60%) of the most recent gun theft incidents reported by respondents occurred in the victim's home. An additional 15% were from cars, and 25% from all other places. In about a quarter of these thefts (28%), at least one gun had been recovered by the time of the survey. Two-thirds (68%) of respondents reported their most recent gun theft to police (over 80% of non-Hispanic White gun owners compared to about half of other gun owners). One quarter of these theft victims had insurance that covered the firearm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gun carrying, keeping a gun in one's car, and storing guns loaded and unlocked may increase harm to the community by increasing the number of guns that get into the hands of criminals.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866245/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145879290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00624-7
Julia J Lund, Julia P Schleimer, Paul M Reeping, Veronica A Pear
Objectives: To conduct a scoping review of research on government spending and violence.
Methods: We searched nine databases for peer-reviewed publications evaluating the association between government spending on public goods and services and (other- or self-directed) violent physical injury or death in the United States.
Results: Of 5,734 screened articles, 33 met the inclusion criteria. Over one-third of studies were published in the last ten years (n = 13). Studies most commonly evaluated spending at the state (n = 19), county (n = 5), and city (n = 5) levels. Studies examined spending on social welfare (n = 21), health (n = 12), education (n = 9), law enforcement (n = 8), and/or community development (n = 2). Outcomes were homicide/assault (n = 28) and suicide (n = 17). All studies were ecologic, 24 were serial cross-sectional, and most (n = 28) made attempts to control for confounding. Findings were mixed, but studies of social welfare, health, and education most commonly found that increased spending was significantly associated with reductions in violence.
Conclusions: While research has varied somewhat in methodology and findings, results of this scoping review indicate that government investments in supportive services may be promising structural interventions to prevent violence and promote safety and health.
{"title":"Public funds, public safety: a scoping review of government spending decisions and their impact on interpersonal violence and suicide.","authors":"Julia J Lund, Julia P Schleimer, Paul M Reeping, Veronica A Pear","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00624-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00624-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a scoping review of research on government spending and violence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched nine databases for peer-reviewed publications evaluating the association between government spending on public goods and services and (other- or self-directed) violent physical injury or death in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5,734 screened articles, 33 met the inclusion criteria. Over one-third of studies were published in the last ten years (n = 13). Studies most commonly evaluated spending at the state (n = 19), county (n = 5), and city (n = 5) levels. Studies examined spending on social welfare (n = 21), health (n = 12), education (n = 9), law enforcement (n = 8), and/or community development (n = 2). Outcomes were homicide/assault (n = 28) and suicide (n = 17). All studies were ecologic, 24 were serial cross-sectional, and most (n = 28) made attempts to control for confounding. Findings were mixed, but studies of social welfare, health, and education most commonly found that increased spending was significantly associated with reductions in violence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While research has varied somewhat in methodology and findings, results of this scoping review indicate that government investments in supportive services may be promising structural interventions to prevent violence and promote safety and health.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12750604/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145858158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00652-3
Garen J Wintemute, Sonia L Robinson, Andrew Crawford, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Mona A Wright, Veronica A Pear, Aaron B Shev
Background: A nationally representative longitudinal survey in the USA found a decrease in population-level support for political violence from 2022 to 2023. This individual-level analysis of those data examines associations between the occurrence of 18 specified life events and subsequent change in views on political violence.
Methods: Participants in the Life in America Survey were members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Wave 2 of the survey was fielded online May 18-June 8, 2023; all respondents to 2022's Wave 1 who remained in KnowledgePanel were invited to participate. We calculated individual scores for 2022 and 2023 on 35 political violence measures from the first component of an ordinal principal components analysis and computed the difference in scores for individual respondents from 2022 to 2023 to represent a 1-year change in these measures. Our principal outcomes are adjusted mean differences in change scores from 2022 to 2023 between individuals experiencing and not experiencing the 18 life events.
Results: The completion rate was 84.2%; there were 9385 respondents. Support for political violence decreased for 19.9% of respondents, increased for 14.2%, and remained unchanged for 65.9%. When events were considered individually in a model that adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and other life events, only "things improved for me financially" was associated with decreased support for political violence among respondents as a whole; "I gave up on politics" was associated with an increase. No event was associated with change among both men and women when they were analyzed separately. Among respondents who reported in 2022 that violence was usually or always justified for at least 1 political objective, no events were associated with change in support for political violence. Among those who strongly approved in 2022 of left-wing violent extremist organizations or movements, "my political beliefs changed a lot" was associated with a large decrease.
Conclusions: In this cohort, few life events were associated with changes in support for political violence across the entire population, but there were important subset findings. The findings support interventions to improve measures of economic well-being across the population and to encourage belief change among extremists as political violence prevention measures.
{"title":"Life events and change in support for political violence in the United States: findings from a 2023 nationally representative survey.","authors":"Garen J Wintemute, Sonia L Robinson, Andrew Crawford, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Mona A Wright, Veronica A Pear, Aaron B Shev","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00652-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00652-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A nationally representative longitudinal survey in the USA found a decrease in population-level support for political violence from 2022 to 2023. This individual-level analysis of those data examines associations between the occurrence of 18 specified life events and subsequent change in views on political violence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the Life in America Survey were members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Wave 2 of the survey was fielded online May 18-June 8, 2023; all respondents to 2022's Wave 1 who remained in KnowledgePanel were invited to participate. We calculated individual scores for 2022 and 2023 on 35 political violence measures from the first component of an ordinal principal components analysis and computed the difference in scores for individual respondents from 2022 to 2023 to represent a 1-year change in these measures. Our principal outcomes are adjusted mean differences in change scores from 2022 to 2023 between individuals experiencing and not experiencing the 18 life events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The completion rate was 84.2%; there were 9385 respondents. Support for political violence decreased for 19.9% of respondents, increased for 14.2%, and remained unchanged for 65.9%. When events were considered individually in a model that adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and other life events, only \"things improved for me financially\" was associated with decreased support for political violence among respondents as a whole; \"I gave up on politics\" was associated with an increase. No event was associated with change among both men and women when they were analyzed separately. Among respondents who reported in 2022 that violence was usually or always justified for at least 1 political objective, no events were associated with change in support for political violence. Among those who strongly approved in 2022 of left-wing violent extremist organizations or movements, \"my political beliefs changed a lot\" was associated with a large decrease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort, few life events were associated with changes in support for political violence across the entire population, but there were important subset findings. The findings support interventions to improve measures of economic well-being across the population and to encourage belief change among extremists as political violence prevention measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12853587/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145847006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00638-1
Kelsey M Conrick, Erika Marts, Rachel Ross, Esprene Liddell-Quintyn, Julia P Schleimer, Ayah Mustafah, Nicole Asa, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar
Background: Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) are civil legal tools that temporarily restrict firearm access for individuals deemed to pose a risk of harm to themselves or others. Although ERPOs are strictly civil orders, their implementation often overlaps with other legal and behavioral health interventions. This qualitative study examined patterns among individuals subject to law enforcement-filed ERPOs in Washington State who intersect with arrest and involuntary transportation for behavioral health evaluation, and how these intervention pathways relate to ERPO outcomes.
Methods: Of the 859 ERPOs granted at the temporary level in Washington State between 2016 and 2022, 57.6% (n = 495) involved one of the three intervention pathways: arrest (29.6%, n = 254), involuntary transport for behavioral health evaluation (26.1%, n = 224), or both (2.0%, n = 17) during the precipitating event that led to ERPO filing. We conducted qualitative analysis using the pen portrait method for n = 130 of these 495 cases to examine how risk was framed in court narratives and how those narratives corresponded with intervention pathways and ERPO outcomes.
Results: Narratives that emphasized self-harm frequently described involuntary transport, while those highlighting threats to others often involved arrest. Other factors, including firearm presence, mental health history, and how intent was described, emerged as recurring narrative elements and corresponded with specific intervention pathways. Judges ordered behavioral health evaluations in 36.3% of granted one-year ERPOs, but no clear patterns emerged between intervention pathways and this outcome.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that law enforcement narratives were associated with how ERPO cases unfolded and which systems became involved. These findings highlight how variation in the way risk is framed in ERPO petitions, particularly around perceived intent, danger to self versus others, and contextual factors, can influence how systems respond, even under similar behavioral circumstances.
{"title":"Criminal legal and behavioral health pathways in law enforcement-petitioned extreme risk protection orders.","authors":"Kelsey M Conrick, Erika Marts, Rachel Ross, Esprene Liddell-Quintyn, Julia P Schleimer, Ayah Mustafah, Nicole Asa, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00638-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00638-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) are civil legal tools that temporarily restrict firearm access for individuals deemed to pose a risk of harm to themselves or others. Although ERPOs are strictly civil orders, their implementation often overlaps with other legal and behavioral health interventions. This qualitative study examined patterns among individuals subject to law enforcement-filed ERPOs in Washington State who intersect with arrest and involuntary transportation for behavioral health evaluation, and how these intervention pathways relate to ERPO outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 859 ERPOs granted at the temporary level in Washington State between 2016 and 2022, 57.6% (n = 495) involved one of the three intervention pathways: arrest (29.6%, n = 254), involuntary transport for behavioral health evaluation (26.1%, n = 224), or both (2.0%, n = 17) during the precipitating event that led to ERPO filing. We conducted qualitative analysis using the pen portrait method for n = 130 of these 495 cases to examine how risk was framed in court narratives and how those narratives corresponded with intervention pathways and ERPO outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Narratives that emphasized self-harm frequently described involuntary transport, while those highlighting threats to others often involved arrest. Other factors, including firearm presence, mental health history, and how intent was described, emerged as recurring narrative elements and corresponded with specific intervention pathways. Judges ordered behavioral health evaluations in 36.3% of granted one-year ERPOs, but no clear patterns emerged between intervention pathways and this outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that law enforcement narratives were associated with how ERPO cases unfolded and which systems became involved. These findings highlight how variation in the way risk is framed in ERPO petitions, particularly around perceived intent, danger to self versus others, and contextual factors, can influence how systems respond, even under similar behavioral circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12709734/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00639-0
Samar Al-Hajj, Larry Thomas, Len Garis, Khalil El-Asmar, Farah El-Hajj, Ian Pike
Background: Occupational injury accounts for the highest rate of morbidity and mortality among firefighters, surpassing other occupations. Canada is particularly susceptible to fires and consequently increased health burden. This study examines trends in firefighters' injury and death claims across Canada, focusing on claim characteristics, mechanisms of injury and disease, and geographic distribution across provinces and territories.
Methods: Data on accepted fatality and time-loss injury claims were collected from the Association of Workers' Compensation Boards of Canada (AWCBC) and WorkSafeBC over 15 years (2007-2021). Linear regression models were used to assess trends in time-loss injury and fatality claims. Chi-square tests were conducted to analyze the distribution of fatalities and injuries across age groups.
Results: A total of 29,499 claims were analyzed, including 1,509 fatalities and 27,990 time-loss injuries, with males representing 92.2% of injury and 99.4% of fatality claims. Cancer was the leading cause of fatalities, accounting for 84.6% of claims with a fatality rate of 993.7 per 100,000 firefighters per year. Traumatic injuries were the primary cause of time-loss claims, comprising 80.6% of cases with a rate of 17,859.1 per 100,000 firefighters per year. Mental health-related claims saw a significant 231.2% increase. The "65 and over" age group had the highest fatality claims (n = 826, 54.7%), with statistically significant differences observed in the distribution of fatalities and injuries between age groups (p = 0.002 < 0.05). Ontario reported the most fatalities (n = 713, 47.3%) and time-loss claims (n = 8591, 30.7%), followed by Quebec, British Columbia, and Alberta.
Conclusion: This study highlights the increasing burden of cancer among Canadian firefighters and the sharp rise in mental health-related claims, emphasizing the need for further research into the occupational health risks faced by firefighters to improve their long-term well-being.
{"title":"Occupational injury among firefighters in Canada: a trends analysis of fatality and time-loss injury claims (2007-2021).","authors":"Samar Al-Hajj, Larry Thomas, Len Garis, Khalil El-Asmar, Farah El-Hajj, Ian Pike","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00639-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00639-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational injury accounts for the highest rate of morbidity and mortality among firefighters, surpassing other occupations. Canada is particularly susceptible to fires and consequently increased health burden. This study examines trends in firefighters' injury and death claims across Canada, focusing on claim characteristics, mechanisms of injury and disease, and geographic distribution across provinces and territories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on accepted fatality and time-loss injury claims were collected from the Association of Workers' Compensation Boards of Canada (AWCBC) and WorkSafeBC over 15 years (2007-2021). Linear regression models were used to assess trends in time-loss injury and fatality claims. Chi-square tests were conducted to analyze the distribution of fatalities and injuries across age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,499 claims were analyzed, including 1,509 fatalities and 27,990 time-loss injuries, with males representing 92.2% of injury and 99.4% of fatality claims. Cancer was the leading cause of fatalities, accounting for 84.6% of claims with a fatality rate of 993.7 per 100,000 firefighters per year. Traumatic injuries were the primary cause of time-loss claims, comprising 80.6% of cases with a rate of 17,859.1 per 100,000 firefighters per year. Mental health-related claims saw a significant 231.2% increase. The \"65 and over\" age group had the highest fatality claims (n = 826, 54.7%), with statistically significant differences observed in the distribution of fatalities and injuries between age groups (p = 0.002 < 0.05). Ontario reported the most fatalities (n = 713, 47.3%) and time-loss claims (n = 8591, 30.7%), followed by Quebec, British Columbia, and Alberta.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the increasing burden of cancer among Canadian firefighters and the sharp rise in mental health-related claims, emphasizing the need for further research into the occupational health risks faced by firefighters to improve their long-term well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12709765/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00642-5
Meron Girma, Julia P Schleimer, Andrew Hillen, Astrid Aveledo, Ayah Mustafa, Deepika Nehra, Dominique Davis, Elaine Gonzalez, Emily Westlake, Esprene Liddell-Quintyn, Kris Torset, Kristian Jones, Laura Johnson, Lina R Benson, Lynniah Grayson, Orlando Ames, Rachel Ross, Samantha Decker, Taffy Hunter, Tarell Harrison, Tier Simon-Matthews, Vivian Lyons, Zaheed Lynch, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar
Background: Community violence intervention (CVI) is increasingly considered an important component of comprehensive public safety infrastructure, but research and evaluation of CVI programs remain underdeveloped. There is a critical need for evaluation measures that are developed collaboratively with those most proximate to these interventions and that capture interventions' nuanced and holistic impacts. This paper presents the process and results of a practitioner-academic partnership to co-develop youth-focused CVI evaluation measures in Washington state.
Results: The process of co-developing evaluation measures involved two phases. For phase 1, we created a menu of quantitative measures (n = 60) for each outcome construct in a previously co-developed CVI theory of change by integrating existing measures, identified through a literature review, with insights and recommendations from CVI practitioners gathered during a workshop. For phase 2, we tailored and refined quantitative and qualitative measures with/for 7 CVI programs involved in the collaboration via individual meetings (n = 45 one-hour meetings over the course of 10 months, average = 6.4 meetings per program). The process of refining measures involved extensive discussion around several key considerations, including confidentiality, age appropriateness of questions, and language/jargon. After revisions, each CVI program had a customized list of quantitative and qualitative measures that fit their program and the population they served. We also created an online toolkit accompanying this paper so others may easily use, tailor, and build upon our work.
Conclusions: Our process of co-developing youth-focused CVI evaluation measures drew from existing literature while heavily prioritizing the knowledge, expertise, and capacity of CVI practitioners. This helped facilitate power sharing and responsiveness to community needs, and we believe it resulted in more appropriate and contextually relevant measures. By detailing the iterative process that we took along with the resulting evaluation measures, our intent is to encourage practitioner-academic collaboration and underscore how such partnerships can enhance the field's understanding of CVI implementation and impacts.
{"title":"Engaging practitioners and academic researchers in co-developing evaluation measures for community violence interventions.","authors":"Meron Girma, Julia P Schleimer, Andrew Hillen, Astrid Aveledo, Ayah Mustafa, Deepika Nehra, Dominique Davis, Elaine Gonzalez, Emily Westlake, Esprene Liddell-Quintyn, Kris Torset, Kristian Jones, Laura Johnson, Lina R Benson, Lynniah Grayson, Orlando Ames, Rachel Ross, Samantha Decker, Taffy Hunter, Tarell Harrison, Tier Simon-Matthews, Vivian Lyons, Zaheed Lynch, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00642-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00642-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community violence intervention (CVI) is increasingly considered an important component of comprehensive public safety infrastructure, but research and evaluation of CVI programs remain underdeveloped. There is a critical need for evaluation measures that are developed collaboratively with those most proximate to these interventions and that capture interventions' nuanced and holistic impacts. This paper presents the process and results of a practitioner-academic partnership to co-develop youth-focused CVI evaluation measures in Washington state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The process of co-developing evaluation measures involved two phases. For phase 1, we created a menu of quantitative measures (n = 60) for each outcome construct in a previously co-developed CVI theory of change by integrating existing measures, identified through a literature review, with insights and recommendations from CVI practitioners gathered during a workshop. For phase 2, we tailored and refined quantitative and qualitative measures with/for 7 CVI programs involved in the collaboration via individual meetings (n = 45 one-hour meetings over the course of 10 months, average = 6.4 meetings per program). The process of refining measures involved extensive discussion around several key considerations, including confidentiality, age appropriateness of questions, and language/jargon. After revisions, each CVI program had a customized list of quantitative and qualitative measures that fit their program and the population they served. We also created an online toolkit accompanying this paper so others may easily use, tailor, and build upon our work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our process of co-developing youth-focused CVI evaluation measures drew from existing literature while heavily prioritizing the knowledge, expertise, and capacity of CVI practitioners. This helped facilitate power sharing and responsiveness to community needs, and we believe it resulted in more appropriate and contextually relevant measures. By detailing the iterative process that we took along with the resulting evaluation measures, our intent is to encourage practitioner-academic collaboration and underscore how such partnerships can enhance the field's understanding of CVI implementation and impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12801489/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145726525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}