首页 > 最新文献

Rastitel''nost'' Rossii最新文献

英文 中文
Segetal vegetation of the Southern Urals: alliance Scleranthion annui (Kruseman et Vlieger 1939) Sissingh in Westhoff et al. 1946 乌拉尔山脉南部的节段植被:Scleranthion annui联盟(Kruseman et Vlieger 1939)Westhoff的Sissingh等人1946
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI: 10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.120
G. Khasanova, S. Yamalov, M. Lebedeva
Segetal communities are the sets the weed plant species which are formed under the influence of edafo-climatic conditions and the mode of disturbance — the systems of processing of the soil in a crop rotation (so-called agrotechnical factor) (Mirkin, Naumova, 2012). The history of their study in the Southern Urals is more than 80 years old (Dmitriyev, 1935; Gaysin, 1950; Minibaev, 1961; Bakhtizin, Rakhimov, 1968; Denisova et al., 1970). Development of classification according to floristic approach has been begun in the 1980th by Ufa geobotanists. Results have been generalized in the collective monography (Mirkin et al., 1985). A repeated syntaxonomical analysis was carried out a long time later only for the Trans-Ural region of the Republic of Bashkortostan (Yamalov et al., 2007).The purpose of the present research is to reveal a phytodiversity of weed vegetation of the Southern Urals, using all available geobotanical data, and to develop its syntaxonomy. This paper presents the results of the classification of one of the three allocated alliances. The dataset contains 1171 relevés: 891 were performed by authors in the course of the 2002–2016 field seasons, while 280 are taken from the mentioned monography (Mirkin et al., 1985).All plots belong to class Papaveretea rhoeadis which combines annual weed vegetation of winter, summer and the row-crop cultures, gardens and initial stages of succession (Mucina et al., 2016). Within the class these are distributed between orders Aperetalia spicae-venti J. Tx. et Tx. in Malato-Beliz et al. 1960 and Papaveretalia rhoeadis Hüppe et Hofmeister ex Theurillat et al. 1995. Alliance Scleranthion annui (Kruseman et Vlieger 1939) Sissingh in Westhoff et al. 1946 goes to the first one, while Caucalidion Tx. ex von Rochow 1951 and Lactucion tataricae Rudakov in Mirkin et al. 1985 — to the second. The alliances are well differentiated floristically (Table 2) and according to zonal affinity.Alliance Scleranthion annui (Fig. 2) combines the most mesophyte communities distributed mainly on gray forest and soddy podzolic soils, rarer on other types of soils in the southern part of the forest zone and northern part of the forest-steppe one. Diagnostic group includes terophytes: Centaurea cyanus, Tripleurospermum perforatum, Euphorbia helioscopia, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Polygonum aviculare, Viola arvensis, Raphanus raphanistrum.Alliance Caucalidion (Fig. 3) combines communities on rich carbonate chernozem soils of the forest-steppe zone. It is intermediate between Scleranthion annui and Lactucion tataricae in zonal gradient. Diagnostic species are Galeopsis ladanum, Sonchus arvensis, Persicaria lapathifolia, Galeopsis bifida, Silene noctiflora, Erodium cicutarium, Thlaspi arvense, Galium aparine. They are also highly constant in communities of alliance Scleranthion annui in the forest zone, but are absent or low constant in these of alliance Lactucion tataricae in the steppe zone.Alliance Lactucion tataricae (Fig. 4
双裂Galeopietum bifidae结合了20世纪80年代广泛分布在灰化黑钙土森林草原区的冬季作物群落(Mirkin等人,1985)。这种联系介于硬化虫和考卡林虫之间 — 表8,N 9)结合了平原和山区森林地带以及森林草原地带北部主要的行作物和夏季栽培群落。它们位于灰色的森林土壤上,在灰化的黑钙土上更为罕见。DCA排序数据说明了关联的分化(图6)。第一个轴被解释为一个复杂的湿润梯度和一个农业生态因子。沿着土壤丰富度-盐度的第二轴,潮湿灰化土壤上的群落被灰色森林土壤和灰化黑钙土的山地变体上的群落所取代。
{"title":"Segetal vegetation of the Southern Urals: alliance Scleranthion annui (Kruseman et Vlieger 1939) Sissingh in Westhoff et al. 1946","authors":"G. Khasanova, S. Yamalov, M. Lebedeva","doi":"10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.120","url":null,"abstract":"Segetal communities are the sets the weed plant species which are formed under the influence of edafo-climatic conditions and the mode of disturbance — the systems of processing of the soil in a crop rotation (so-called agrotechnical factor) (Mirkin, Naumova, 2012). The history of their study in the Southern Urals is more than 80 years old (Dmitriyev, 1935; Gaysin, 1950; Minibaev, 1961; Bakhtizin, Rakhimov, 1968; Denisova et al., 1970). Development of classification according to floristic approach has been begun in the 1980th by Ufa geobotanists. Results have been generalized in the collective monography (Mirkin et al., 1985). A repeated syntaxonomical analysis was carried out a long time later only for the Trans-Ural region of the Republic of Bashkortostan (Yamalov et al., 2007).\u0000The purpose of the present research is to reveal a phytodiversity of weed vegetation of the Southern Urals, using all available geobotanical data, and to develop its syntaxonomy. This paper presents the results of the classification of one of the three allocated alliances. The dataset contains 1171 relevés: 891 were performed by authors in the course of the 2002–2016 field seasons, while 280 are taken from the mentioned monography (Mirkin et al., 1985).\u0000All plots belong to class Papaveretea rhoeadis which combines annual weed vegetation of winter, summer and the row-crop cultures, gardens and initial stages of succession (Mucina et al., 2016). Within the class these are distributed between orders Aperetalia spicae-venti J. Tx. et Tx. in Malato-Beliz et al. 1960 and Papaveretalia rhoeadis Hüppe et Hofmeister ex Theurillat et al. 1995. Alliance Scleranthion annui (Kruseman et Vlieger 1939) Sissingh in Westhoff et al. 1946 goes to the first one, while Caucalidion Tx. ex von Rochow 1951 and Lactucion tataricae Rudakov in Mirkin et al. 1985 — to the second. The alliances are well differentiated floristically (Table 2) and according to zonal affinity.\u0000Alliance Scleranthion annui (Fig. 2) combines the most mesophyte communities distributed mainly on gray forest and soddy podzolic soils, rarer on other types of soils in the southern part of the forest zone and northern part of the forest-steppe one. Diagnostic group includes terophytes: Centaurea cyanus, Tripleurospermum perforatum, Euphorbia helioscopia, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Polygonum aviculare, Viola arvensis, Raphanus raphanistrum.\u0000Alliance Caucalidion (Fig. 3) combines communities on rich carbonate chernozem soils of the forest-steppe zone. It is intermediate between Scleranthion annui and Lactucion tataricae in zonal gradient. Diagnostic species are Galeopsis ladanum, Sonchus arvensis, Persicaria lapathifolia, Galeopsis bifida, Silene noctiflora, Erodium cicutarium, Thlaspi arvense, Galium aparine. They are also highly constant in communities of alliance Scleranthion annui in the forest zone, but are absent or low constant in these of alliance Lactucion tataricae in the steppe zone.\u0000Alliance Lactucion tataricae (Fig. 4","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45456440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Pine forests (Pineta kochianae) in the Republic of Daghestan 达吉斯坦共和国的松林
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI: 10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.3
Z. I. Abdurakhmanova, V. Yu. Neshataev, V. Neshataeva
The study of the floristic and coenotic diversity of Daghestan forests was being conducted for about a century. It was started by N. A. Bush (1905) and N. I. Kuznetsov (1911). Later A. A. Grossheim (1925) gave a brief description of birch, pine and mixed forests in the limestone region of internal mountain Daghestan. A significant contribution to the study of these forests was done by I. I. Tumadzhanov (1938), M. M. Magomedmirzayev (1965) and P. L. Lvov (1964). However, despite of the large number of papers on the forest vegetation of Daghestan, the Koch pine (Pinus kochiana Klotzsch. ex C. Koch) forests, which occupy about 75 000 hectares (17 % of the forest area of the Daghestan), were studied poorly.The present study is based on the data of field study by the authors in several districts of foothill Daghestan, internal mountain Daghestan and high mountain Daghestan in 2012–2016 within key-areas. The releves were carried out using the standard methods (Methods…, 2002) on 99 sample plots of 20×20 m. In addition, relevйs collected by Tumadzhanov (1938) and Magomedmirzayev (1965) were used for the syntaxa characteristic. Totally 140 relevйs were included into analysis. The classification of Pinus kochiana communities was made using the dominant-determinant approach of Russian geobotanical school founded by V. N. Sukachev. Syntaxa names are given according to the «Draft Code of Phytocoenological Nomenclature» (Neshataev, 2001).The Prodromus and the diagnostic features of the syntaxa are presented. The entire set of 140 releves was referred to the formation Pineta kochianae differing fr om Pineta sylvestris, not only by dominant species, but also by species composition and community structure. The most constant species occuring in the majority of associations are Juniperus oblonga in the shrub layer; Calamagrostis arundinacea, Fraga­ria vesca, Galium valantioides, Thalictrum foetidum in the herb and dwarf-shrub layer; Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus in the moss one. Six groups of associations and 28 associations were distinguished. The main diagnostic features of association groups (Table 1), phytocoenotic and synoptic tables for associations (tables 2–13) are presented.The density of tree layer in Pinus kochiana stands varied from 0.3 to 0.9. The pine trees at the age of 100 years have a height from 5 to 25 m (usually 10–15). The Pinus kochiana stand yield class (bonitet) varies from Va to III class; stands of IV class predominate. In the tree layer the following species occur in different associations: Acer platanoides, A. trautvetteri, Armeniaca vulgaris, Betula litwinowii, B. pendula, B. raddeana, Carpinus caucasica, Fagus orientalis, Fraxinus excelsior, Juniperus oblonga, Malus orientalis, Populus tremula, Pyrus caucasica, Quercus macranthera, Q. petraea, Q. pubescens, Q. robur, Salix caprea, Sorbus aucuparia, Taxus baccata, Tilia begoniifolia, T. cordata. In the understory the young growth of Betula litwinowii, B. pendula, B. raddeana, Juniperus
对达赫斯坦森林的区系和群落多样性的研究已经进行了大约一个世纪。它是由N.A.Bush(1905)和N.I.Kuznetsov(1911)创立的。后来,A.A.Grossheim(1925)简要描述了达吉斯坦内山石灰岩地区的桦树、松树和混交林。I.I.Tumadzhanov(1938)、M.M.Magomedmirzayev(1965)和P.L.Lvov(1964)对这些森林的研究做出了重大贡献。然而,尽管有大量关于达吉斯坦森林植被的论文,但对约75000公顷(占达吉斯坦林区17%)的科赫松(Pinus kochiana Klotzsch.ex C.Koch)森林的研究却很少。本研究基于作者2012-2016年在重点地区内的山麓-达赫斯坦、内山-达赫斯坦和高山-达赫坦几个地区的实地研究数据。使用标准方法(methods…,2002)在99个20×20m的样地上进行了相关研究。此外,使用Tumadzhanov(1938)和Magomedmirzayev(1965)收集的relevйs进行句法特征分析。共纳入140个相关因素进行分析。利用苏卡切夫建立的俄罗斯地植物学校的优势行列式方法对中国松群落进行了分类。根据《植物群落命名法草案》(Neshataev,2001)给出了新分类群的名称。介绍了syntaxa的Prodromus和诊断特征。整个140个亲缘关系是指与樟子松不同的松科的形成,不仅在优势种方面,而且在物种组成和群落结构方面。大多数群落中最常出现的物种是灌木层的圆柏;草本和矮生灌木层中的Calamagrostis arundinacea、Fraga­ria vesca、Galium valantioides、Thalictrum foetidum;Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus在苔藓中的一个。区分了6组协会和28个协会。介绍了关联组的主要诊断特征(表1)、关联的植物群落学和天气学表(表2-13)。赤松林分乔木层密度在0.3~0.9之间。100年树龄的松树的高度为5至25米(通常为10至15米)。赤松林分产量等级(bonitet)从Va级到III级不等;以IV级林分为主。在乔木层中,以下物种以不同的组合出现:Acer platanoides、A.trautvetteri、Armeniica vulgaris、Betula litwinowii、B.pendula、B.raddeana、Carpinus caucasica、Fagus orientalis、Fraxinus excelsior、Juniperus oblonga、Malus orientalis,Populus tremula、Pyrus caucasica,Quercus macranthera、Q.petraea、Q,红豆杉,秋海棠,T.cordata。林下生长着小桦、垂枝桦、拉德德纳桦、欧龙杜松、奥氏花楸、巴卡红豆杉、光榆等幼树。灌木层通常发育良好;其密度高达60%。不同群落中灌木层中最常出现的物种是小檗、黄檗、油桐、达芙妮、梅泽兰、圆柏、木忍冬、高加索杜鹃、木犀、氧齿蔷薇、皮条菊。在林带的上缘,经常出现野生树莓(Rubus idaeus)和矮生灌木(Empetrum caucasicum,Vaccinium myrtillus,V.vitis idaea)。在研究的群落中共发现487种草本植物。多年生草本植物和草本植物占主导地位。物种的生态群落(中生植物、旱生植物和中旱生植物)具有同等的代表性。苔藓目有107种,马钱藻目有3种,苔藓覆盖率从单个个体到90%不等。只有少数附生地衣和风倒树干上的单生地衣。Koch松林广泛分布在海拔1200米以上的北坡,主要分布在不同气候条件地区的砂岩、石灰石或粘土板岩形成的岩石斜坡上,从山麓的干燥气候到达赫斯坦高山的潮湿寒冷气候。它们的物种组成、优势类群和群落结构取决于土壤类型、海拔位置和下伏岩石类型。区分了三个生态群:1)中生松林,包括富含苔藓、杜鹃花和中生草本植物的中生松林;2)具有苔草和羽状短柄草的中生干生松林;3)具有毛栎、黄檗、球墨栎等的中生中生干植松林(Abdurakhmanova et al.,2015)。
{"title":"Pine forests (Pineta kochianae) in the Republic of Daghestan","authors":"Z. I. Abdurakhmanova, V. Yu. Neshataev, V. Neshataeva","doi":"10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.3","url":null,"abstract":"The study of the floristic and coenotic diversity of Daghestan forests was being conducted for about a century. It was started by N. A. Bush (1905) and N. I. Kuznetsov (1911). Later A. A. Grossheim (1925) gave a brief description of birch, pine and mixed forests in the limestone region of internal mountain Daghestan. A significant contribution to the study of these forests was done by I. I. Tumadzhanov (1938), M. M. Magomedmirzayev (1965) and P. L. Lvov (1964). However, despite of the large number of papers on the forest vegetation of Daghestan, the Koch pine (Pinus kochiana Klotzsch. ex C. Koch) forests, which occupy about 75 000 hectares (17 % of the forest area of the Daghestan), were studied poorly.\u0000The present study is based on the data of field study by the authors in several districts of foothill Daghestan, internal mountain Daghestan and high mountain Daghestan in 2012–2016 within key-areas. The releves were carried out using the standard methods (Methods…, 2002) on 99 sample plots of 20×20 m. In addition, relevйs collected by Tumadzhanov (1938) and Magomedmirzayev (1965) were used for the syntaxa characteristic. Totally 140 relevйs were included into analysis. The classification of Pinus kochiana communities was made using the dominant-determinant approach of Russian geobotanical school founded by V. N. Sukachev. Syntaxa names are given according to the «Draft Code of Phytocoenological Nomenclature» (Neshataev, 2001).\u0000The Prodromus and the diagnostic features of the syntaxa are presented. The entire set of 140 releves was referred to the formation Pineta kochianae differing fr om Pineta sylvestris, not only by dominant species, but also by species composition and community structure. The most constant species occuring in the majority of associations are Juniperus oblonga in the shrub layer; Calamagrostis arundinacea, Fraga­ria vesca, Galium valantioides, Thalictrum foetidum in the herb and dwarf-shrub layer; Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus in the moss one. Six groups of associations and 28 associations were distinguished. The main diagnostic features of association groups (Table 1), phytocoenotic and synoptic tables for associations (tables 2–13) are presented.\u0000The density of tree layer in Pinus kochiana stands varied from 0.3 to 0.9. The pine trees at the age of 100 years have a height from 5 to 25 m (usually 10–15). The Pinus kochiana stand yield class (bonitet) varies from Va to III class; stands of IV class predominate. In the tree layer the following species occur in different associations: Acer platanoides, A. trautvetteri, Armeniaca vulgaris, Betula litwinowii, B. pendula, B. raddeana, Carpinus caucasica, Fagus orientalis, Fraxinus excelsior, Juniperus oblonga, Malus orientalis, Populus tremula, Pyrus caucasica, Quercus macranthera, Q. petraea, Q. pubescens, Q. robur, Salix caprea, Sorbus aucuparia, Taxus baccata, Tilia begoniifolia, T. cordata. In the understory the young growth of Betula litwinowii, B. pendula, B. raddeana, Juniperus","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43518086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The floodplain meadows of class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea Tx. 1937 in the Varzuga River valley (Murmansk Region) 1937年,瓦尔祖加河流域(摩尔曼斯克地区)的molinio - arrhenaththerea类泛滥平原草甸。
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI: 10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.85
N. Koroleva, E. Kopeina
In the Murmansk Region floodplain meadows of class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea Tx. 1937 being there on the northern limit of distribution in Europe, rarely occur along the large rivers. The research with purpose of classification was conducted in lower stream of the Varzuga River, which is one of the largest (254 km long) river on Kola Peninsula. Few large islands are disposed in the lower course of the river. Riverbanks are formed mainly by sandstones and moraine deposits which prevent the formation of a vast floodplain formation; its the largest area is situated downstream the Varzuga village, that is one of the oldest settlements of Kola Peninsula, arisen in 15 century. The agriculture period on floodplains around the village has about 500 years of regular mowing and grazing.The river basin is located in the taiga zone. Adjacent spruce and pine forests belong to associations Empetro–Piceetum obovatae (Sambuk 1932) Morozova 2008 and Cladonio arbusculae–Pinetum sylvestris (Cajander 1921) K.-Lund 1967, bogs — to ass. Empetro–Sphagnetum fusci (Du Rietz (1921) 1926) Dierssen 1982. Ferns and tall herbs dominated birch forests occur on Varzuga River islands. Sandy beach vegetation of Ammophiletea Br.-Bl. et Tx. ex Westhoff et al. 1946 and halophytic marshes of Junceteamaritimi Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl. et al. 1952 were described in the river mouth (Koroleva, 1999; Koroleva et al., 2011).Floodplain meadows (Fig. 1) were studied on the river banks and on islands from the Varzuga village to river mouth, in July and August in 2013 and 2015. 46 relevés were performed on sample plots mainly 10×10 m on the base of Braun-Blanquet approach. The syntaxa of high level are in accordance with latest survey by L. Mucina et al. (2016).Floodplain meadows belong to the alliance Astragalo subpolaris–Festucion rubrae all. nov. hoc loco (holotypus — Anthoxantho alpini–Geranietum sylvatici ass. nov. hoc loco) (Table 1) with following diagnostic species: Sanguisorba polygama, Dianthus superbus, Astragalus subpolaris, Oxytropis sordida, Myosotis asiatica, Veratrum lobelianum, Hedysarum arcticum, Senecio nemorensis, Allium schoenoprasum, Potentilla crantzii.Plant communities include mesophytic herbs, diagnostic species of classes Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and Mulgedio-Aconitetea Hadač et Klika in Klika et Hadač 1944, with group of species characteristic for tundra meadows (Dianthus superbus, Astragalus subpolaris, Oxytropis sordida, Bistorta vivipara and Potentilla crantzii). More than half of diagnostic species of alliance Astragalo subpolaris–Festucion rubrae have arctic, arctic-alpine and hypoarctic distribution.Two associations belong to this alliance: ass. Diantho superbi–Festucetum ovinae ass. nov. (Table 2; holotypus hoc loco — relevé 2 (186/13), Fig. 2) with diagnostic species Dianthus superbus, Thymus subarcticus, Campanula rotundifolia, Antennaria ­dioica, Calluna vulgaris, Festuca ovina, Nardus stricta, Viola canina, Potentilla crantzii, P. erecta, Sonchus arvensis, Pilo
在摩尔曼斯克地区,Molinio Arrhenatheretea Tx.1937级泛滥平原草甸位于欧洲分布的北部,很少出现在大河沿岸。这项研究是在科拉半岛最大(254公里长)的河流之一瓦尔祖加河的下游进行的,目的是进行分类。很少有大岛位于河流的下游。河岸主要由砂岩和冰碛沉积物形成,这些沉积物阻止了广阔的泛滥平原的形成;其最大的区域位于Varzuga村的下游,这是科拉半岛最古老的定居点之一,出现于15世纪。村庄周围洪泛平原的农业期约为500年 多年的定期割草和放牧。该河流域位于针叶林地带。邻近的云杉和松林属于Empetro–Piceetum obovatae(Sambuk 1932)Morozova 2008和Cladonio arbsculae–Pinetum sylvestris(Cajander 1921)K.-Lund 1967,沼泽地至沼泽地。Empetro-Sphagnatum fusci(Du Rietz(1921)1926)Dierssen 1982。蕨类植物和高大的草本植物主要分布在瓦尔祖加河岛屿上的桦树林中。河口描述了Ammophiletea Br.-Bl.et Tx.ex Westhoff et al.1946的沙滩植被和Br.-Bl et al.1952的Junceteamaritimi Br.-Bl..的盐生沼泽(Koroleva,1999;Koroleva et al.,2011)。2013年和2015年7月和8月,对河岸和从Varzuga村到河口的岛屿上的洪泛平原草地(图1)进行了研究。46 在Braun Blanquet方法的基础上,对10×10m的样地进行了相关研究。高级句法是根据L。 Mucina等人(2016)。洪泛平原草甸属于黄芪亚群落-红节联盟。nov.hoc loco(holotypus-Anthoxantho alpini–Geranietum sylvatici ass.nov.hoc roco)(表1),具有以下诊断物种:地榆、石竹、黄芪、棘豆、亚洲黄颡鱼、三叶草、圆夜蛾、千里光、葱、委陵菜。植物群落包括中生草本植物、Molinio Arrhenatheretea和Mulgedio Aconitetea Hadačet Klika(Klika et Hadać1944)类的诊断物种,以及苔原草甸特有的一组物种(超级石竹、黄芪亚群、棘豆、活体双足虫和委陵菜)。黄芪亚群-红节联盟的诊断物种有一半以上具有北极、北极高山和亚北极分布。有两个协会属于该联盟:A.Diantho superbi–Festucetum ovinae A.snov。(表2;holotypus hoc loco-relevé2(186/13),图2)与诊断物种超级石竹、亚北极胸腺、圆叶风铃、Antennaria­dioica、Calluna vulgaris、Festuca ovina、Nardus stricta、Viola canina、Potentilla crantzii、P。 直立树、山杨、拉丁皮洛菌。低矮的草本草地被用作牧场,主要分布在比下一个群落更高、更干燥的栖息地。Antho­xantho alpini–Geranietum sylvatici Ass.nov.(表3;holotypus hoc loco-relevé17(136/13),图3)包括砍伐森林后形成的定期修剪的高大草本草地。诊断分类群为高山花、天竺葵、当归、白蜡树、欧洲Trollius europaeus、木槿、异叶圆菊、紫薇。Deschampsion cespitosae Horvatić1930联盟的Filippendolo ulmariae–Deschampsitum cespitosae-Shushpannikova et Yamalov 2013助理(表4)在村庄附近的潮湿洼地中进行了描述。诊断分类群为Deschampsia cespitosa和Filippendula ulmaria。Conioselion tatarici Golub等人的群落类型Festuca rubra–Ligusticum scothicum(表5)出现在Varzuga河口的岛屿和泛滥平原上。诊断分类群为:川芎、红羊茅、委陵菜、芬马报春花、阿龙地龙、小花报春、阿留香Lathyrus aleuticus、苔草Carex lanceolata、Eleocharis palustris。Molinio Arrhena­the retea类洪泛平原草甸物种丰富,约有140种维管植物,20种 % 其中以高恒定性发生(超过60 % 存在于至少一个语法中),以及20 % 高覆盖(超过5 % 至少在一个社区中)。草地的组成反映了特定的栖息地,有短暂的春季洪水、定期的放牧和割草、紧邻桦树和松林、苔原带和白海岸。这些草地值得被列为特别保护区“瓦尔祖加河流域和岛屿的洪泛平原草地”。如果国家公园“Terskiy Bereg”的理念得以复兴,则分析的草地将被纳入自然和文化遗产保护区,并实行特殊的割草和适度放牧制度。
{"title":"The floodplain meadows of class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea Tx. 1937 in the Varzuga River valley (Murmansk Region)","authors":"N. Koroleva, E. Kopeina","doi":"10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.85","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.85","url":null,"abstract":"In the Murmansk Region floodplain meadows of class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea Tx. 1937 being there on the northern limit of distribution in Europe, rarely occur along the large rivers. The research with purpose of classification was conducted in lower stream of the Varzuga River, which is one of the largest (254 km long) river on Kola Peninsula. Few large islands are disposed in the lower course of the river. Riverbanks are formed mainly by sandstones and moraine deposits which prevent the formation of a vast floodplain formation; its the largest area is situated downstream the Varzuga village, that is one of the oldest settlements of Kola Peninsula, arisen in 15 century. The agriculture period on floodplains around the village has about 500 years of regular mowing and grazing.\u0000The river basin is located in the taiga zone. Adjacent spruce and pine forests belong to associations Empetro–Piceetum obovatae (Sambuk 1932) Morozova 2008 and Cladonio arbusculae–Pinetum sylvestris (Cajander 1921) K.-Lund 1967, bogs — to ass. Empetro–Sphagnetum fusci (Du Rietz (1921) 1926) Dierssen 1982. Ferns and tall herbs dominated birch forests occur on Varzuga River islands. Sandy beach vegetation of Ammophiletea Br.-Bl. et Tx. ex Westhoff et al. 1946 and halophytic marshes of Junceteamaritimi Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl. et al. 1952 were described in the river mouth (Koroleva, 1999; Koroleva et al., 2011).\u0000Floodplain meadows (Fig. 1) were studied on the river banks and on islands from the Varzuga village to river mouth, in July and August in 2013 and 2015. 46 relevés were performed on sample plots mainly 10×10 m on the base of Braun-Blanquet approach. The syntaxa of high level are in accordance with latest survey by L. Mucina et al. (2016).\u0000Floodplain meadows belong to the alliance Astragalo subpolaris–Festucion rubrae all. nov. hoc loco (holotypus — Anthoxantho alpini–Geranietum sylvatici ass. nov. hoc loco) (Table 1) with following diagnostic species: Sanguisorba polygama, Dianthus superbus, Astragalus subpolaris, Oxytropis sordida, Myosotis asiatica, Veratrum lobelianum, Hedysarum arcticum, Senecio nemorensis, Allium schoenoprasum, Potentilla crantzii.\u0000Plant communities include mesophytic herbs, diagnostic species of classes Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and Mulgedio-Aconitetea Hadač et Klika in Klika et Hadač 1944, with group of species characteristic for tundra meadows (Dianthus superbus, Astragalus subpolaris, Oxytropis sordida, Bistorta vivipara and Potentilla crantzii). More than half of diagnostic species of alliance Astragalo subpolaris–Festucion rubrae have arctic, arctic-alpine and hypoarctic distribution.\u0000Two associations belong to this alliance: ass. Diantho superbi–Festucetum ovinae ass. nov. (Table 2; holotypus hoc loco — relevé 2 (186/13), Fig. 2) with diagnostic species Dianthus superbus, Thymus subarcticus, Campanula rotundifolia, Antennaria ­dioica, Calluna vulgaris, Festuca ovina, Nardus stricta, Viola canina, Potentilla crantzii, P. erecta, Sonchus arvensis, Pilo","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43204256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Coenotical diversity of vegetation of mountain-tundra and open woodland belts on the Manpupuner Ridge (Northern Urals, Pechoro-Ilychskiy Nature Reserve) 北乌拉尔地区曼普纳岭山地-冻土带和开阔林地植被群落多样性
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI: 10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.47
S. Degteva, Y. Dubrovskiy
The study of coenotical diversity of mountain tundra and open woodland altitudinal belts at Manpupuner ridge (Pechoro-Ilych Nature Reserve) in 2012–2013 continues the previous researches by Institute of Biology Komi Scientific Centre RAS at ridges Schuka-Yol-is, Kychyl-is, Makar-is, Tonder and Turynya-ner, and Mankhambo in 2007–2011 (Deg­teva, Dubrovskiy 2009, 2012, 2014).The data were obtained using the complex of traditional and modern methods of phytocoenotical and floristical researches (Ipatov, Mirin, 2008). 184 relevés (kept in the Phytocoenarium of the Institute of Biology KSC RAS), made at 400 m2 plots in open woodland and forests stands, at 100 m2 plots in meadow, tundra and shrub stands or within the limits of the communities, were set along the profiles at the elevation gradients. The assessment of vertical and horizontal structure, species number and abundance of vascular plants, main mosses and lichens as well as community classification according the dominant approach was carried out.In mountain tundra communities which are located at flat plates and terraces of the upper part of slopes 122 species of vascular plants, 36 of mosses and 37 of lichens were found. Three associations (Fruticuleto-betuletum nanae flavocetrariosum (Fig. 2), Fruticuletum cladinosum, Myrtilletum cladinosum, Fruticuletum cladinosum) of lichen tundra (Table 2), two ones (Fruticuleto-betuletum nanae hylocomiosum, Myrtilletum hylocomiosum) of green moss tundra (Fig. 3, 4) and ass. Bistorto majoris-avenelletum poly­trichosum of Polytrichum-dominated tundra (Table 3) were distinguished.More diverse is vegetation of the open woodland belt where the complex of open woodlands, bushes and meadows is presented.Poor in species number spruce open woodlands with total tree crown density is 0.1–0.2 and of 2–3 m height in the upper part of the belt and 6 m in the lower slope parts, which occur at about 680–760 m,1 belong to associations Piceetum betuloso nanae–caricoso-empetroso-cladinosum and P. avenelloso-myrtilloso-hylocomiosum (Table 4; Fig. 5).Pinus sibirica open woodlands (Table 4) of lichen (Cembretum betuloso nanae–arctoetoso alpinae–flavocetrariosum (Fig. 6) and C. caricoso globularis–vaccinioso uliginosii–cladinosum) and green moss (C. caricoso globularis–vaccinioso uliginosii–hylocomiosum) types were met at 620–640 m at flat terraces (first time in the Pechoro-Ilych Nature Reserve).Open woodlands dominated by mountain ecological form of Betula pubescens occur at 580–770 m more common at east and north-west exposition, but also occur at south-west and north slopes and in the southern part of the Manpupuner Ridge, on terraces. Taxation parameters of the stands change with the elevation changes. In the upper part of this belt, the canopy density is 0.1–0.2, tree height 1.5–2.5 m and stem diameter 2–4 cm, at elevations about 600 m, 0.4–0.6, 8–12 m and 18–26 cm respectively. Five associations are distinguished within this formation: Montano-Betuletum gymnocarpio
2012 - 2013年Manpupuner岭(Pechoro-Ilych自然保护区)山地冻土带和开放林地高度带群落多样性研究延续了科米科学中心RAS生物研究所2007-2011年在Schuka-Yol-is、Kychyl-is、Makar-is、Tonder和Turynya-ner以及Mankhambo岭的研究(Deg-teva, Dubrovskiy 2009, 2012, 2014)。这些数据是利用传统和现代植物群落和植物区系研究的综合方法获得的(Ipatov, Mirin, 2008)。184份相关资料(保存在KSC RAS生物研究所的植物馆中),在开阔林地和林分400平方米的地块上,在草地、冻土带和灌木林分100平方米的地块上或在群落范围内,沿着海拔梯度的剖面设置。根据优势法对维管植物、主要苔藓和地衣的垂直和水平结构、种类数量和丰度进行了评价,并进行了群落分类。山地冻土带群落位于坡顶的平板和阶地上,其中维管植物122种,苔藓36种,地衣37种。地衣冻土带的3个类群(Fruticuleto-betuletum nanutuletum flavotrariosum,图2)、绿苔冻土带的2个类群(Fruticuletum nanuletum cladinosum, Myrtilletum cladinosum)(图3、4)和多毛藓为主的冻土带的1个类群(ass. Bistorto -avenelletum polytrichosum)(表3)。开阔林地带植被更为多样,呈现出开阔林地、灌木和草甸的综合体。总树冠密度在0.1 ~ 0.2之间,树冠高度在上部2 ~ 3 m,坡下6 m,分布在680 ~ 760 m左右的云杉阔叶林,属Piceetum betuloso nanae-caricoso-empetroso-cladinosum和P. avenelloso-myrtilloso-hylocomiosum组合(表4);图5)西伯利亚松林(表4)在620 ~ 640 m的平地上(首次在Pechoro-Ilych自然保护区)发现了地衣(Cembretum betuloso nanae - arctotoso alpinae-flavocetrariosum,图6)和绿苔(C. caricoso globullari - vaccinioso uliginosii-hylocomiosum)类型(C. caricoso globullari - vaccinioso uliginosii)类型。以山地生态形式的短毛桦为主的开放林地分布在海拔580-770米的地方,多见于东部和西北露地,但也见于西南和北坡以及曼普纳岭南部的梯田上。林分赋税参数随海拔变化而变化。在海拔600 m、0.4 ~ 0.6 m、8 ~ 12 m和18 ~ 26 cm处,林冠密度为0.1 ~ 0.2,树高1.5 ~ 2.5 m,茎粗2 ~ 4 cm。在这一组中有五个组合:Montano-Betuletum gymnocarpiosum, m - b。白花天竺葵,m.b。calamagrostidosum M.-B。附子(图7),M.- B.;(表5)灌木植被为柳属、白桦和西伯利亚杜松林。柳树(Salicetum lanatae geraniosum albiflorii和Salicetum lanatae mixtoherboso-calamagrostidosum)(表6,图8)生长在海拔700-770米的溪流径流/山谷中。杜松群落(Juniperetum sibiricae avenelloso-myrtilloso-hylocomiosum,图9)和杜松(Juniperetum sibiricae gymnocarpiosum;表6)在皮霍罗-伊里奇自然保护区位于670-780米的排水生态区内的梯田、平坦和凸坡上。白桦林(Betuletum nanae empetroso-caricoso-hylocomioso-cladinosum,图10)、白桦林caricoso-hylocomiosum(图11)和白桦林fruticuloso-hylocomiosum;表6)涵盖了680-750米的最大区域,在各个顶点之间的露台,平坦,凸和凹斜坡和鞍。山间草甸(菖蒲(Calamagrostidetum geraniosum)(图12)和山间草甸(Geranietum mixtoherbosum)(图13)在山脊处面积不大,生长在溪流径流、山谷和石田边缘的肥沃湿润土壤上)中,维管植物有117种,苔藓有27种,地衣有32种(表7),其群落核心由草甸和山间草甸生态群落组成。100 m2样地的物种数量在12 ~ 45个之间(平均27个)。在山地林带中占主导地位的有3个群落(Piceetum fruticuloso-hylocomiosum、P. aconitosum和P. dryopteridosum expansae)。Manpupuner Ridge的类群水平共有27个,包括山地苔原、灌木、草甸、开阔林地和森林。
{"title":"Coenotical diversity of vegetation of mountain-tundra and open woodland belts on the Manpupuner Ridge (Northern Urals, Pechoro-Ilychskiy Nature Reserve)","authors":"S. Degteva, Y. Dubrovskiy","doi":"10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.47","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.47","url":null,"abstract":"The study of coenotical diversity of mountain tundra and open woodland altitudinal belts at Manpupuner ridge (Pechoro-Ilych Nature Reserve) in 2012–2013 continues the previous researches by Institute of Biology Komi Scientific Centre RAS at ridges Schuka-Yol-is, Kychyl-is, Makar-is, Tonder and Turynya-ner, and Mankhambo in 2007–2011 (Deg­teva, Dubrovskiy 2009, 2012, 2014).\u0000The data were obtained using the complex of traditional and modern methods of phytocoenotical and floristical researches (Ipatov, Mirin, 2008). 184 relevés (kept in the Phytocoenarium of the Institute of Biology KSC RAS), made at 400 m2 plots in open woodland and forests stands, at 100 m2 plots in meadow, tundra and shrub stands or within the limits of the communities, were set along the profiles at the elevation gradients. The assessment of vertical and horizontal structure, species number and abundance of vascular plants, main mosses and lichens as well as community classification according the dominant approach was carried out.\u0000In mountain tundra communities which are located at flat plates and terraces of the upper part of slopes 122 species of vascular plants, 36 of mosses and 37 of lichens were found. Three associations (Fruticuleto-betuletum nanae flavocetrariosum (Fig. 2), Fruticuletum cladinosum, Myrtilletum cladinosum, Fruticuletum cladinosum) of lichen tundra (Table 2), two ones (Fruticuleto-betuletum nanae hylocomiosum, Myrtilletum hylocomiosum) of green moss tundra (Fig. 3, 4) and ass. Bistorto majoris-avenelletum poly­trichosum of Polytrichum-dominated tundra (Table 3) were distinguished.\u0000More diverse is vegetation of the open woodland belt where the complex of open woodlands, bushes and meadows is presented.\u0000Poor in species number spruce open woodlands with total tree crown density is 0.1–0.2 and of 2–3 m height in the upper part of the belt and 6 m in the lower slope parts, which occur at about 680–760 m,1 belong to associations Piceetum betuloso nanae–caricoso-empetroso-cladinosum and P. avenelloso-myrtilloso-hylocomiosum (Table 4; Fig. 5).\u0000Pinus sibirica open woodlands (Table 4) of lichen (Cembretum betuloso nanae–arctoetoso alpinae–flavocetrariosum (Fig. 6) and C. caricoso globularis–vaccinioso uliginosii–cladinosum) and green moss (C. caricoso globularis–vaccinioso uliginosii–hylocomiosum) types were met at 620–640 m at flat terraces (first time in the Pechoro-Ilych Nature Reserve).\u0000Open woodlands dominated by mountain ecological form of Betula pubescens occur at 580–770 m more common at east and north-west exposition, but also occur at south-west and north slopes and in the southern part of the Manpupuner Ridge, on terraces. Taxation parameters of the stands change with the elevation changes. In the upper part of this belt, the canopy density is 0.1–0.2, tree height 1.5–2.5 m and stem diameter 2–4 cm, at elevations about 600 m, 0.4–0.6, 8–12 m and 18–26 cm respectively. Five associations are distinguished within this formation: Montano-Betuletum gymnocarpio","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46775946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Viktor Gavrilyuk (1928–2005) and his role in the study of Chukotka Viktor Gavrilyuk(1928-2005)及其在楚科奇研究中的作用
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI: 10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.147
O. Svystun, G. Chorna, T. Mamchur, M. Parubok
Viktor Antonovich Gavrilyuk (21.01.1928–26.11.2005) was a specialist in biology of plants of the Far North, by the will of the fate, devoted the most of his life to teaching activities. Saved personal diaries show how forming of an extraordinary personality occurred, overcoming the difficulties of life and study in the difficult war and post-war years, in Shadrinsk Agricultural Technical School, Kurgan Agricultural Institute at first, and then at Uman Agricultural Institute.The teachers of V. A. were competent people, devoted to their work: Vera Platonovna Kushnirenko, Nikolai Mikhailovich Voskresensky, Valentin Fedo­rovich Nikolaev, Simon Samoylovich Rubin and many other specialists who managed to inspire the young man with the sciences about nature.Entering post graduate school of the Komarov Botanical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR (BIN) led a young talented researcher to Chukotka, where he conducted stationary field works in 1956–1958 under the guidance by Boris Anatolyevich Tikhomirov, the Professor. V. A. Gavrilyuk studied the flora of the environs of Providence Bay, Chaplinskie hot springs, islands of Arakamchechen, Mechigmen Bay, Senyavin Strait, Senyavin and Lorino hot springs. Scrupulous field research in harsh conditions of the north-east of the Chukotka Peninsula, laboratory processing of extensive personal herbarium collections (used subsequently for the fundamental edition «Arctic flora of the USSR» allowed V. A. Gavrilyuk to defend successfully his dissertation for the degree of the Candidate of Biological Sciences in 1962 (Gavrilyuk,1962).V. A., being one of the stuff of the Laboratory of Vegetation of the Far North (BIN), took part in botanical researches of the Koryak highland not far from the villages of Kultushnoye and Tilichiki, as well as in the Korfa Bay in the Koryaksky National District of Kamchatka territory in 1960. In 1961, he conducted phenological and eco-biomorphological studies at the Biological Station “Sivaya Maska” and visited the Rayiz mountain in the Polar Ural. Besides the observation kept in field diaries and herbarium, V. A. left watercolour pictures depicting amazing plants, some of which, made on Ladoga station of Leningrad State University, have been saved (Chorna et al., 2017, 2018).After moving to Uman, more than forty years V. A. worked at first as a teacher and as an Assistant Professor and at last as the Head of the Department of Botany of Uman Agricultural Institute. He took over the leadership of the collection botanical nursery from his former teacher V. F. Nikolaev. Plans of the botanical nursery of 1964–1982, lists of seeds prepared for exchange (Index seminum) (Gavrilyuk, Romanshchak, 1978) indicated about a rich collection. In fact, the floristical nursery was a regional botanical garden cooperated with Moscow, Leningrad, Tallinn, Tartus, Nikitsky, Yerevan botanical gardens, he sent plant seeds to amateur growers.Working in Uman city, V. A. continued extensive correspon
维克多·安东诺维奇·加夫里约克(Viktor Antonovich Gavrilyuk, 1928年1月21日- 2005年11月26日)是一位研究遥远北方植物生物学的专家,出于命运的意志,他把大部分时间都奉献给了教学活动。保存下来的个人日记显示了一个非凡的个性是如何形成的,在艰难的战争和战后的岁月里,他克服了生活和学习的困难,首先是在沙德林斯克农业技术学校,库尔干农业学院,然后是在乌曼农业学院。V. A.的老师。维拉·普拉托诺夫娜·库什尼连科、尼古拉·米哈伊洛维奇·沃斯克列先斯基、瓦伦丁·费多罗维奇·尼古拉耶夫、西蒙·萨莫伊洛维奇·鲁宾和许多其他的专家,他们成功地用自然科学激励了这个年轻人。进入苏联科学院科马罗夫植物研究所(BIN)的研究生院后,他带领一名年轻的有才华的研究人员前往楚科奇,在鲍里斯·阿纳托利耶维奇·季霍米洛夫教授的指导下,于1956年至1958年在那里进行了固定的野外工作。诉。加夫里约克研究了普罗维登斯湾、查普林斯基温泉、阿拉卡姆chechen岛、Mechigmen湾、塞尼亚文海峡、塞尼亚文和洛里诺温泉周围的植物群。在楚科奇半岛东北部的恶劣条件下进行了严谨的实地研究,对大量个人植物标本进行了实验室处理(后来用于基础版“苏联北极植物区系”)。加夫里留克在1962年成功地为他的生物科学候选人学位论文辩护(加夫里留克,1962)。作为远北植被实验室(BIN)的一员,他于1960年参加了距离Kultushnoye和Tilichiki村庄不远的Koryak高地以及堪察加半岛Koryaksky国家地区的Korfa湾的植物研究。1961年,他在“Sivaya Maska”生物站进行物候和生态生物形态学研究,并访问了极地乌拉尔的Rayiz山。除了记录在野外日记和植物标本室的观察外,v.a。留下的水彩画描绘了令人惊叹的植物,其中一些是在列宁格勒国立大学的拉多加站制作的,已经保存下来(Chorna等人,2017,2018)。搬到人类后,四十多年来v.a.。起初,他是一名教师,后来担任助理教授,最后担任人类农业研究所植物学系主任。他从他以前的老师v·f·尼古拉耶夫手中接过了收集植物苗圃的领导权。1964-1982年植物苗圃计划,准备交换的种子清单(Index seminum) (Gavrilyuk, Romanshchak, 1978)表明该植物的种子数量丰富。事实上,这个花圃是一个与莫斯科、列宁格勒、塔林、塔尔图斯、尼基茨基、埃里温等植物园合作的地区植物园,他把植物种子送给业余种植者。工作于弗吉尼亚州乌曼市。从列宁格勒时期开始,他们继续保持着广泛的通信。有许多著名科学家写给他的信件和卡片:维克托·维克托·马辛、阿尔夫·埃林·波尔希尔德(波尔希尔德,1957)、多丽丝·本塔·玛丽亚和阿斯克尔Löve、劳伦斯和格温妮丝·布利斯、诺拉·科里。按照现代的标准,出版的作品并不多,但它们在半个世纪后仍被引用。事实上,楚科奇是世界上研究最多的地区之一,这也是他活动的一部分。这位年轻科学家发表的日记可以作为一种测试,用来测试初入自然领域的研究人员的适用性:他们是否准备好了v·a·加夫里留克特有的那种献身精神。
{"title":"Viktor Gavrilyuk (1928–2005) and his role in the study of Chukotka","authors":"O. Svystun, G. Chorna, T. Mamchur, M. Parubok","doi":"10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.147","url":null,"abstract":"Viktor Antonovich Gavrilyuk (21.01.1928–26.11.2005) was a specialist in biology of plants of the Far North, by the will of the fate, devoted the most of his life to teaching activities. Saved personal diaries show how forming of an extraordinary personality occurred, overcoming the difficulties of life and study in the difficult war and post-war years, in Shadrinsk Agricultural Technical School, Kurgan Agricultural Institute at first, and then at Uman Agricultural Institute.\u0000The teachers of V. A. were competent people, devoted to their work: Vera Platonovna Kushnirenko, Nikolai Mikhailovich Voskresensky, Valentin Fedo­rovich Nikolaev, Simon Samoylovich Rubin and many other specialists who managed to inspire the young man with the sciences about nature.\u0000Entering post graduate school of the Komarov Botanical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR (BIN) led a young talented researcher to Chukotka, where he conducted stationary field works in 1956–1958 under the guidance by Boris Anatolyevich Tikhomirov, the Professor. V. A. Gavrilyuk studied the flora of the environs of Providence Bay, Chaplinskie hot springs, islands of Arakamchechen, Mechigmen Bay, Senyavin Strait, Senyavin and Lorino hot springs. Scrupulous field research in harsh conditions of the north-east of the Chukotka Peninsula, laboratory processing of extensive personal herbarium collections (used subsequently for the fundamental edition «Arctic flora of the USSR» allowed V. A. Gavrilyuk to defend successfully his dissertation for the degree of the Candidate of Biological Sciences in 1962 (Gavrilyuk,1962).\u0000V. A., being one of the stuff of the Laboratory of Vegetation of the Far North (BIN), took part in botanical researches of the Koryak highland not far from the villages of Kultushnoye and Tilichiki, as well as in the Korfa Bay in the Koryaksky National District of Kamchatka territory in 1960. In 1961, he conducted phenological and eco-biomorphological studies at the Biological Station “Sivaya Maska” and visited the Rayiz mountain in the Polar Ural. Besides the observation kept in field diaries and herbarium, V. A. left watercolour pictures depicting amazing plants, some of which, made on Ladoga station of Leningrad State University, have been saved (Chorna et al., 2017, 2018).\u0000After moving to Uman, more than forty years V. A. worked at first as a teacher and as an Assistant Professor and at last as the Head of the Department of Botany of Uman Agricultural Institute. He took over the leadership of the collection botanical nursery from his former teacher V. F. Nikolaev. Plans of the botanical nursery of 1964–1982, lists of seeds prepared for exchange (Index seminum) (Gavrilyuk, Romanshchak, 1978) indicated about a rich collection. In fact, the floristical nursery was a regional botanical garden cooperated with Moscow, Leningrad, Tallinn, Tartus, Nikitsky, Yerevan botanical gardens, he sent plant seeds to amateur growers.\u0000Working in Uman city, V. A. continued extensive correspon","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46124382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geobotany at the XIV Delegate Congress of Russian Botanical Society and the conference “Botany in the Modern World” (Makhachkala, June 18–23, 2018) 在俄罗斯植物学会第十四届代表大会暨“现代世界的植物学”会议上的地球植物学(Makhachkala, 2018年6月18-23日)
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI: 10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.138
T. Lysenko, D. Mirin
The XIV Congress of the Russian Botanical Society (RBO) and the conference «Botany in the Modern World» were held at 18–23 of June 2018 in Makhachkala (the Republic of Dagestan) on the bases of Dagestan Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences and Dagestan State University. Materials of the conference were published in 3 volumes by the beginning of meeting. Geobotanical publications are included in the second volume (Botany in the modern world …, 2018). The analysis of the materials shows that participants are represented 26 cities of Russia, 4 of Belarus and Kazakhstan and 1 of Australia. Research data are collected in 36 regions of Russia, 2 of Kazakhstan, as well as in Belarus, Azerbaijan and Egypt, in addition, 4 generalizing works are performed on large volumes of geobotanical relevés from all over Europe or Russia. The data on forests are analyzed in 18 reports, that ones on meadows formed the basis for 12 presented works, 9 communications are based on data of wetlands, 7 works are devoted to steppe vegetation, 5 — to tundra, 5 — to shrub communities, 4 — to vegetation of saline habitats, 4 — to pioneer plant groupings, 3 — to synanthropic vegetation, 2 communications are based on aquatic vegetation. Data of field experiment, shibliak, xeric open forests, deserts, friganoid and petrophytic vegetation are each the base of single report.The message topics were very diverse. Regional characteristic of various groups of plant communities and/or their classification is reflected in 38 studies; 14 researches are devoted to environment-vegetation or environment-plant interactions; results of 13 reports are based on vegetation mapping or obtained for the purpose of studying the geography of plant communities and geobotanical mapping; 11 communications are devoted to dynamics of vegetation and structure of phytocenoses; the main emphasis of 10 researches is a study of species composition of plant communities; data of 9 works are collected on existing and proposed specially protected natural areas, these studies are related to the nature protection; in 8 reports special attention is paid to the development of geobotanical research methods and phytosociological terminology; in 5 works the structure of populations of plant species is analyzed.The Congress that was held at a good scientific level reflected the current state of geobotanical science in Russia.
俄罗斯植物学会(RBO)第十四届大会和“现代世界的植物学”会议于2018年6月18日至23日在达吉斯坦共和国马哈奇卡拉举行,以俄罗斯科学院达吉斯坦研究中心和达吉斯坦州立大学为基地。会议开始时,会议材料已出版三卷。地植物学出版物收录在第二卷(《现代世界植物学…》,2018年)。对材料的分析显示,参与者来自俄罗斯的26个城市、白俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的4个城市以及澳大利亚的1个城市。在俄罗斯的36个地区、哈萨克斯坦的2个地区以及白俄罗斯、阿塞拜疆和埃及收集了研究数据。此外,还对来自欧洲或俄罗斯的大量地植物相关资料进行了4项推广工作。18份报告对森林数据进行了分析,其中草地数据构成了12项工作的基础,9份通信基于湿地数据,7份工作致力于草原植被,5份致力于苔原,5份专注于灌木群落,4份致力于盐碱栖息地的植被,4份专注于先锋植物群,3份致力于共生植被,2通信基于水生植被。野外试验资料、石斑、xeric疏林、沙漠、冷凝物和岩生植被资料均为单项报告的基础。信息主题非常多样化。38项研究反映了不同植物群落群的区域特征和/或其分类;14 致力于环境-植被或环境-植物相互作用的研究;13份报告的结果是基于植被测绘或为研究植物群落地理和地理植物学测绘而获得的;11篇通讯专门讨论了植被动力学和植物群落结构;10项研究的重点是植物群落的物种组成研究;收集了9个关于现有和拟议的特别保护自然区的作品的数据,这些研究与自然保护有关;在8份报告中,特别关注地植物学研究方法和植物社会学术语的发展;在5篇著作中,对植物种群结构进行了分析。在良好的科学水平上举行的大会反映了俄罗斯地质植物学的现状。
{"title":"Geobotany at the XIV Delegate Congress of Russian Botanical Society and the conference “Botany in the Modern World” (Makhachkala, June 18–23, 2018)","authors":"T. Lysenko, D. Mirin","doi":"10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.138","url":null,"abstract":"The XIV Congress of the Russian Botanical Society (RBO) and the conference «Botany in the Modern World» were held at 18–23 of June 2018 in Makhachkala (the Republic of Dagestan) on the bases of Dagestan Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences and Dagestan State University. Materials of the conference were published in 3 volumes by the beginning of meeting. Geobotanical publications are included in the second volume (Botany in the modern world …, 2018). The analysis of the materials shows that participants are represented 26 cities of Russia, 4 of Belarus and Kazakhstan and 1 of Australia. Research data are collected in 36 regions of Russia, 2 of Kazakhstan, as well as in Belarus, Azerbaijan and Egypt, in addition, 4 generalizing works are performed on large volumes of geobotanical relevés from all over Europe or Russia. The data on forests are analyzed in 18 reports, that ones on meadows formed the basis for 12 presented works, 9 communications are based on data of wetlands, 7 works are devoted to steppe vegetation, 5 — to tundra, 5 — to shrub communities, 4 — to vegetation of saline habitats, 4 — to pioneer plant groupings, 3 — to synanthropic vegetation, 2 communications are based on aquatic vegetation. Data of field experiment, shibliak, xeric open forests, deserts, friganoid and petrophytic vegetation are each the base of single report.\u0000The message topics were very diverse. Regional characteristic of various groups of plant communities and/or their classification is reflected in 38 studies; 14 researches are devoted to environment-vegetation or environment-plant interactions; results of 13 reports are based on vegetation mapping or obtained for the purpose of studying the geography of plant communities and geobotanical mapping; 11 communications are devoted to dynamics of vegetation and structure of phytocenoses; the main emphasis of 10 researches is a study of species composition of plant communities; data of 9 works are collected on existing and proposed specially protected natural areas, these studies are related to the nature protection; in 8 reports special attention is paid to the development of geobotanical research methods and phytosociological terminology; in 5 works the structure of populations of plant species is analyzed.\u0000The Congress that was held at a good scientific level reflected the current state of geobotanical science in Russia.","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42090890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The syntaxonomy of the meadow vegetation of Kulunda and Kasmala pine forest strips (Altai Territory) Kulunda和Kasmala松林带(阿尔泰地区)草甸植被的组合
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI: 10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.101
M. P. Tishchenko, A. Korolyuk
Pine forests of the steppe and forest-steppe zones of West-Siberian plain (Ob-Irtysh watershed) represent a unique natural phenomenon. They form anomalously large continuous forest massifs (pine forest strips) on sand deposits in ancient ravines. These forests contrast sharply with the steppe and forest-steppe surroundings, both in the set of plant communities and in species composition. Meadow communities form a narrow belt along the periphery of pine forest strips (Lashchinsky et al., 2018).The studied Kulunda and Kasmala (Fig. 1) pine forest strips are situated in the south-eastern part of West-Siberian plain (52°35′–53°25′ N and 81°10′–83°15′ E) within the forest-steppe zone (Kuminova et al., 1963; Pavlova, 1963). A data set comprising 105 relevés of meadows was classified using TWINSPAN algorithm in Juice (Tichý, 2002), and followed by manual re-arrangement. Cluster analysis of associations was used to determine the main geographical and ecological patterns in meadow vegetation (Fig. 2).Traditionally, meadows are attributed to the class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea R. Tx. 1937. In the last decades, the concept of the class Festuco-Brometea has been changed (Mucina et al., 2016; Willner et al., 2017). In the modern interpretation, the order Brometalia erecti Koch 1926 unites the most mesophytic communities of the class. In this case, the Siberian syntaxa, which previously were considered as the order Festucetalia valesiacae, and some associations of the order Galietalia veri (Molinio-Arrhenatheretea) should be referred to the order Brometalia erecti of the class Festuco-Brometea.The syntaxonomical diversity of meadow vegetation of Kulunda and Kasmala forest strips is represented by two classes, three orders, three alliances, four associations, three subassociations and one community (Table 1).Ass. Peucedano morisonii–Festucetum valesiacae Tishchenko 2018 subass. P. m.–F. v. gypsophiletosum paniculatae subass. nov. hoc loco (Table 2, holotypus — relevé 1 (mr17-071): Altai Territory, Romanovskiy district, 6 km to the W from Guseletovo village, N 52.61063°, E 81.46572°, 25.07.2017. Author — M. P. Tishchenko) unites xeric meadows on slightly saline soils, which were found only in transition between the steppe and forest-steppe zones in southern part of the surveyed territory in the southern part of Kasmala strip (Fig. 3, 1). Specific features of their composition is the high constancy of mesoxerophytic species common in meadow steppes (Artemisia dracunculus, A. glauca, Peucedanum morisonii, Spiraea crenata, Stipa pennata, Veronica spuria, etc.).Ass. Echio vulgaris–Poetum angustifoliae ass. nov. hoc loco (Table 3, holotypus — relevé 1 (mr17-027): Altai Territory, Tyumentsevskiy district, surroundings of Voznesenskiy village, N 53.21215°, E 81.72828°, 21.07.2017. Author — М. P. Tishchenko) represents the widespread xeric meadows on sandy soils at the edges of pine forest strips in the all studied territories (Fig. 3, 2, 3). These communities, which
西伯利亚西部平原草原和森林草原地带(鄂尔喀河流域)的松林是一种独特的自然现象。它们在古老的峡谷中的沙子沉积物上形成了异常巨大的连续森林山丘(松林带)。这些森林在植物群落和物种组成方面与草原和森林草原环境形成鲜明对比。草地群落沿着松林带的外围形成一条狭窄的带(Lashchinsky等人,2018)。所研究的Kulunda和Kasmala(图1)松林带位于森林草原带内的西西伯利亚平原东南部(52°35′–53°25′N和81°10′–83°15′E)(Kuminova等人,1963;巴甫洛娃,1963)。使用Juice(Tichý,2002)中的TWINSPAN算法对包括105个草地相关部分的数据集进行分类,然后进行手动重新排列。关联的聚类分析用于确定草地植被的主要地理和生态模式(图2)。传统上,草地属于Molinio Arrhenatheretea R类。 Tx.1937。在过去的几十年里,Festuco Brometea类的概念发生了变化(Mucina等人,2016;Willner等人,2017)。在现代的解释中,Brometalia eretti Koch目(1926年)将该类中最具中生性的群落结合在一起。在这种情况下,西伯利亚构造,以前被认为是Festucetalia valesiacae目,以及Galietalia veri目(Molinio Arrhenatheretea)的一些组合,应该被称为Festuco-Brometea类的Brometalia erecti目。库伦达和卡斯马拉林带草地植被的构造组学多样性由两类、三目、,三个联盟、四个协会、三个亚协会和一个社区(表1)。前胡-瓦列西亚卡埃蒂什琴科协会,2018年亚协会。P.m.-F.v.番荔枝圆锥花序亚群。nov.hoc loco(表2,全息图 — relevé1 (mr17-071):阿尔泰地区,罗曼诺夫斯基区,6 2017年7月25日,北纬52.61063°,东经81.46572°,距Guseletovo村W公里。作者——M.P.Tishchenko)将xeric草甸结合在微盐渍土上,这些草甸仅在Kasmala带南部调查区域南部的草原和森林草原带之间的过渡地带发现(图3,1)。其组成的具体特征是草甸草原中常见的中旱生物种(龙蒿、A.glauca、前胡、绣线菊、针茅、Veronica spuria等)的高度恒定性,Voznesenskiy村周围,北纬53.21215°,东经81.72828°,2017年7月21日。作者——М。P.Tishchenko)代表了所有研究地区松林带边缘沙质土壤上广泛分布的xeric草甸(图3、2、3)。这些群落既有草地物种,也有草原物种,被用作牧场,因此有许多粗鲁的植物(锁舌草、Echium vulgare、Erigeron acris、Nonea rossica、千里光)处于诊断组合中。由于在湿度梯度上的位置不同,区分了两个亚组合:更为典型的E.v.–P.a.亚组合。nov.hoc loco(表3,rel.1–18)和更多的xeric E.v.–P.a.caricetosum ericetorum subass。nov.hoc loco(表3,rel.19-36;holotypus-relevé20(mr17-011):阿尔泰地区,Shelabookhinskiy区,靠近Kuchuk河流域的Baturovo村,北纬53.40929°,东经82.36375°,2017年7月18日。作者——М。P.Тishchenko)。Campanulo bononiensis–Dactylidetum glo­meratae Ass.nov.hoc loco(表4,rel.1–6;holotypus–relevé4(mr17-104):阿尔泰地区,巴甫洛夫斯基区,距Kasmala村W 6公里,北纬53.42048°,东经83.17238°,2017年7月29日。作者——М。P.Тishchenko)联合了分布在松树和桦树松林潮湿边缘的Carici macourae目-Crepidetalia sibiricae的稀有森林草甸(通常是次生的)(图3,4)。发现了Heracleo sibirici–Festucetum pratensis ass.nov.hoc loco(表4,rel.7-17;holotypus–relevé7(mr17-020):阿尔泰地区,Rebrikinskiy区,Ust Mosikha村附近,Kulunda河流域,北纬53.25558°,东经81.98389°,2017年7月20日。著者 — М。P.Тishchenko)。高草干草草甸具有较高的中生草甸和森林植物恒常性。耐盐植物(Cenolophium denudatum、Hordeum brevisublatum、Plantago cornuti、Cirsium canum、Galatella biflora)的存在表明了这些栖息地。
{"title":"The syntaxonomy of the meadow vegetation of Kulunda and Kasmala pine forest strips (Altai Territory)","authors":"M. P. Tishchenko, A. Korolyuk","doi":"10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.101","url":null,"abstract":"Pine forests of the steppe and forest-steppe zones of West-Siberian plain (Ob-Irtysh watershed) represent a unique natural phenomenon. They form anomalously large continuous forest massifs (pine forest strips) on sand deposits in ancient ravines. These forests contrast sharply with the steppe and forest-steppe surroundings, both in the set of plant communities and in species composition. Meadow communities form a narrow belt along the periphery of pine forest strips (Lashchinsky et al., 2018).\u0000The studied Kulunda and Kasmala (Fig. 1) pine forest strips are situated in the south-eastern part of West-Siberian plain (52°35′–53°25′ N and 81°10′–83°15′ E) within the forest-steppe zone (Kuminova et al., 1963; Pavlova, 1963). A data set comprising 105 relevés of meadows was classified using TWINSPAN algorithm in Juice (Tichý, 2002), and followed by manual re-arrangement. Cluster analysis of associations was used to determine the main geographical and ecological patterns in meadow vegetation (Fig. 2).\u0000Traditionally, meadows are attributed to the class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea R. Tx. 1937. In the last decades, the concept of the class Festuco-Brometea has been changed (Mucina et al., 2016; Willner et al., 2017). In the modern interpretation, the order Brometalia erecti Koch 1926 unites the most mesophytic communities of the class. In this case, the Siberian syntaxa, which previously were considered as the order Festucetalia valesiacae, and some associations of the order Galietalia veri (Molinio-Arrhenatheretea) should be referred to the order Brometalia erecti of the class Festuco-Brometea.\u0000The syntaxonomical diversity of meadow vegetation of Kulunda and Kasmala forest strips is represented by two classes, three orders, three alliances, four associations, three subassociations and one community (Table 1).\u0000Ass. Peucedano morisonii–Festucetum valesiacae Tishchenko 2018 subass. P. m.–F. v. gypsophiletosum paniculatae subass. nov. hoc loco (Table 2, holotypus — relevé 1 (mr17-071): Altai Territory, Romanovskiy district, 6 km to the W from Guseletovo village, N 52.61063°, E 81.46572°, 25.07.2017. Author — M. P. Tishchenko) unites xeric meadows on slightly saline soils, which were found only in transition between the steppe and forest-steppe zones in southern part of the surveyed territory in the southern part of Kasmala strip (Fig. 3, 1). Specific features of their composition is the high constancy of mesoxerophytic species common in meadow steppes (Artemisia dracunculus, A. glauca, Peucedanum morisonii, Spiraea crenata, Stipa pennata, Veronica spuria, etc.).\u0000Ass. Echio vulgaris–Poetum angustifoliae ass. nov. hoc loco (Table 3, holotypus — relevé 1 (mr17-027): Altai Territory, Tyumentsevskiy district, surroundings of Voznesenskiy village, N 53.21215°, E 81.72828°, 21.07.2017. Author — М. P. Tishchenko) represents the widespread xeric meadows on sandy soils at the edges of pine forest strips in the all studied territories (Fig. 3, 2, 3). These communities, which","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49380327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
III International seminar “Mire vegetation: modern problems of classification, mapping, use and protection” (Minsk – Grodno, Belarus, September, 26–28, 2018) “沼泽植被:分类、制图、利用和保护的现代问题”国际研讨会(白俄罗斯明斯克-格罗德诺,2018年9月26-28日)
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI: 10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.142
O. Galanina
The third international seminar “Mire vegetation: modern problems of classification, mapping, use and protection” took place in September 26–28, 2018 in Belarus, Grodno Region. It was organized by B. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany National Academy of Sciences of Belarus and Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Apart from two days of scientific sessions the participants went for half-day field trips visiting the landscape reserve “Ozery”. Two beautiful autumn mires: lake-side pine bog and river valley fen were appreciated by mire specialists from Lithuania, Russia and Belarus. The visit-center of the reserve offered the short lectures on nature, tourist attractions and prospective activities. On September 29 everyone was invited to joint an additional field trip and seminar held in Novy Dvor (Svisloch district) to support a preservation of Belovezhskaya Pushcha in Belarus. Local teachers and experts together with international mire researchers went to the Dikoe mire, the Ramsar site, were they had a training course in the field. All participants of the event were happy to be together, share the experiences and contribute to ecological education.
第三届国际研讨会“沼泽植被:分类、测绘、使用和保护的现代问题”于2018年9月26日至28日举行 在白俄罗斯格罗德诺地区。它是由B组织的。 F 白俄罗斯国家科学院Kuprevich实验植物研究所和格罗德诺Yanka Kupala州立大学。除了两天的科学会议外,参与者还进行了半天的实地考察,参观了风景保护区“Ozery”。立陶宛、俄罗斯和白俄罗斯的淤泥专家欣赏了两处美丽的秋日沼泽:湖畔松沼泽和河谷沼泽。保护区参观中心提供了关于自然、旅游景点和未来活动的简短讲座。9月29日,每个人都被邀请参加在Novy Dvor(Svisloch区)举行的另一次实地考察和研讨会,以支持在白俄罗斯保护Belovezhskaya Pushcha。当地教师和专家与国际泥沼研究人员一起前往拉姆萨尔的Dikoe泥沼进行实地培训。活动的所有参与者都很高兴能在一起,分享经验,为生态教育做出贡献。
{"title":"III International seminar “Mire vegetation: modern problems of classification, mapping, use and protection” (Minsk – Grodno, Belarus, September, 26–28, 2018)","authors":"O. Galanina","doi":"10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/VEGRUS/2018.34.142","url":null,"abstract":"The third international seminar “Mire vegetation: modern problems of classification, mapping, use and protection” took place in September 26–28, 2018 in Belarus, Grodno Region. It was organized by B. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany National Academy of Sciences of Belarus and Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Apart from two days of scientific sessions the participants went for half-day field trips visiting the landscape reserve “Ozery”. Two beautiful autumn mires: lake-side pine bog and river valley fen were appreciated by mire specialists from Lithuania, Russia and Belarus. The visit-center of the reserve offered the short lectures on nature, tourist attractions and prospective activities. On September 29 everyone was invited to joint an additional field trip and seminar held in Novy Dvor (Svisloch district) to support a preservation of Belovezhskaya Pushcha in Belarus. Local teachers and experts together with international mire researchers went to the Dikoe mire, the Ramsar site, were they had a training course in the field. All participants of the event were happy to be together, share the experiences and contribute to ecological education.","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42849424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Forest meadows of the West Siberian Plain and revision of the order Carici macrourae–Crepidetalia sibiricae 西伯利亚西部平原的森林草甸与西伯利亚草原阔叶林目的修正
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.31111/vegrus/2016.29.67
A. Korolyuk, M. P. Tishchenko, S. Yamalov
Forest meadows is a characteristic vegetation type of the forest landscapes fr om the Altai-Sayan mountains on the east to the Southern Urals on the west. Communities inhabit open sites that were formed during natural or anthropogenic dynamic of zonal forests. It is the main reason of the floristic origina­lity of the meadows, as reflected by the presence of numerous forest species. Our study is based on the analysis of 573 relevés from 27 associations represented in the previous publications. All forest meadows of the Southern Siberia and Southern Urals are included in the order Carici macrourae–Crepidetalia sibiricae Ermakov et al. 1999 (Ermakov et al., 1999). Among the differential species (d. s.) are common forest herbs: Aegopodium podagraria, Brachypodium pinnatum, Bupleurum aureum, Calamagrostis arundinacea, Crepis sibirica, Dracocephalum ruyschiana, Geranium pseudosibiricum, Hieracium umbellatum, Lilium pilosiusculum, Lupinaster pentaphyllus, Pulmonaria mollis, Rubus saxatilis. CA-ordination shows that the moisture and geographical position are the most important factors influencing the differentiation of forest meadows. Strict dissimilarity in species composition is found between 3 regions — the Altai-Sayan mountains, West Siberian Plain and Southern Urals. The order Carici macrourae–Crepidetalia sibiricae includes three regional alliances. The alliance Crepidion sibiricae Mirkin ex Ermakov, Maltseva et Makunina 1999 (d. s.: Aegopodium podagraria, Brachypodium pinnatum, Bupleurum aureum, Calamagrostis arundinacea, Crepis sibirica, Dracocephalum ruyschiana, Geranium pseudosibiricum, Hieracium umbellatum, Lilium pilosiusculum, Lupinaster pentaphyllus, Pulmonaria mollis, Rubus saxatilis) unites meadows of piedmonts and low mountains of the Altai, Kuznetsk Alatau and Salair. The alliance Heracleo sibirici–Geranion bifolii all. nov. (d.s.: Cirsium setosum, Geranium bifolium, Hera­cleum sibiricum, Poa palustris, Populus tremula, Veronica longifolia, Vicia megalotropis) occurs almost all over the southern part of the West Siberian Plain (Lashchinsky, Tishchenko, 2011; Tishchenko, 2015). The coenoses inhabit the edges of the deciduous ­forests. The alliance Polygonion krascheninnikovii Kashapov 1985 (d. s.: Bistorta major, Geum rivale, Hylotelephium triphyllum, Rumex acetosa, Stachys officinalis, Trifolium medium, Veronica chamaedrys, Viola tricolor) represents communities of the Southern Urals forest belt (Kashapov, 1985; Filinov et al., 2002; Yamalov et al., 2012). Three regional alliances of forest meadows well correspond to the syntaxonomy structure of the class Brachypodio pinnati–Betuletea pendulae Ermakov et al. 1991 with three orders — Carici macrourae–Pinetalia sylvestris Ermakov et al. 1991 (mostly Altai-Sayan mountains), Calamagrostio epigeii–Betuletalia pendulae Korolyuk ex Ermakov et al. 2000 (West Siberian Plain) and Chamaecytiso ruthenici–Pinetalia sylvestris Solomeshch et Ermakov in Ermakov et al. 2000 (Southern Ural). Ranges o
森林草甸是东起阿尔泰-萨彦山,西至南乌拉尔的森林景观的特色植被类型。社区居住在自然或人为地带性森林动态过程中形成的开放地点。这是草甸植物区系原创性的主要原因,反映在大量森林物种的存在上。我们的研究是基于先前出版物中27个协会的573份相关数据的分析。西伯利亚南部和乌拉尔南部的所有森林草甸都包括在Ermakov etal . 1999 (Ermakov etal ., 1999)。在不同的种类中,有常见的森林草本植物:马尾草、短尾草、柴胡、黄菖蒲、西伯利亚山菖蒲、龙头草、西伯利亚天竺葵、伞形叶菖蒲、百合、五叶莲子、毛菖蒲、沙菖蒲。ca排序表明,湿度和地理位置是影响森林草甸分异的最重要因素。阿尔泰-萨彦山、西西伯利亚平原和乌拉尔南部3个地区在物种组成上存在明显差异。大加勒比骑士团-西伯利亚骑士团包括三个区域联盟。Mirkin ex Ermakov, Maltseva et Makunina 1999(博士论文:马尾草,短尾草,柴胡,菖蒲,西伯利亚菖蒲,龙脑草,假西伯利亚天竺葵,伞形叶,百合,狼皮草,长尾草,鹅毛草)联合了阿尔泰,库兹涅茨克阿拉托和萨尔莱的山前和低山上的草地。赫拉克利奥-西伯利亚- geranion bifolii联盟。11月(论文:卷叶卷叶,两叶天竺葵,西伯利亚天竺葵,palustris, tremula, Veronica longifolia, Vicia megalotropis)几乎遍布西西伯利亚平原南部(Lashchinsky, Tishchenko, 2011;Tishchenko, 2015)。它们栖息在落叶林的边缘。联盟Polygonion krascheninnikovii Kashapov 1985 (d.s s: Bistorta major, Geum rive, Hylotelephium triphyllum, Rumex acetosa, Stachys officinalis, Trifolium medium, Veronica chamaedrys, Viola tricolor)代表了乌拉尔南部森林带的群落(Kashapov, 1985;Filinov et al., 2002;Yamalov et al., 2012)。3个森林草草地区域联盟与Brachypodio pinnatia - betuletea pendulae Ermakov等人1991年(主要是阿尔泰-萨伊安山)、Calamagrostio epigeii-Betuletalia pendulae Korolyuk ex Ermakov等人2000年(西西伯利亚平原)和Chamaecytiso rumakov等人2000年(乌拉尔南部)的分类结构很好地对应。这一森林目的范围通常与相应的草甸联盟重叠。在自然或人为的时间序列中,针叶林和落叶林被草地取代,导致森林和草甸群落之间的植物区系相似。水分梯度对草甸的物种组成有重要影响。它决定了联盟分为中度湿润和干燥森林草甸亚联盟。羊茅科干生植物Br.-Bl.;Klika et hadaki 1944和Galietalia veri Mirkin et Naumova 1986分别作为干林草甸亚系的鉴别种。在中度湿润群落的诊断中,我们使用森林湿生植物。亚联盟西伯利亚虎属亚联盟。11月联合阿尔泰-萨彦山湿润和半湿润地区的适度潮湿的森林草甸。乌头与乌头的结社。11月喜欢干燥的生境。Anthrisco sylvestris-Aconitenion volubilis suball联盟。11月仅限于鄂-额尔齐斯河流域(西西伯利亚平原东南部地区)。这些群落位于潮湿的落叶森林的边缘。西伯利亚西部亚联盟西伯利亚蒿亚联盟。11月广布于森林带南部和森林草原带北部。Polygonenion krasvereheninnikovii Mukhamediarova ex Yamalov et Sultangareeva 2010代表了乌拉尔南部山地林带的中度湿润草甸。社区在缓坡和河谷中都很常见,它们占据了松树和松桦林的边缘和空地。森林草甸的干变异体被包括在阿莫里莫纳-多戈尼翁krasvereheninnikovii Yamalov亚群中。11月。 这些群落在凸坡和山顶以及沿乌拉尔南部森林带和乌拉尔东南部森林草原带的河谷干燥生境中都很常见。利用物种指示值(Korolyuk, 2006)对湿度条件进行分析,显示了中度湿润和干燥森林草甸之间的相似界线:阿尔泰-萨扬和乌拉尔山脉接近61级,西西伯利亚平原为62级,涝渍景观分布广泛。通过对森林草甸的分析,说明了对某些类群和亚类群进行修正的必要性。在许多情况下,正式定义的差异种与句法作者提出的不同。一些关联是由几个相关的组织代表的,需要额外的数据。在水分梯度上,一些句法群的生态范围是重叠的,这说明了群落和亚群落的生态和地理分析的重要性。
{"title":"Forest meadows of the West Siberian Plain and revision of the order Carici macrourae–Crepidetalia sibiricae","authors":"A. Korolyuk, M. P. Tishchenko, S. Yamalov","doi":"10.31111/vegrus/2016.29.67","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/vegrus/2016.29.67","url":null,"abstract":"Forest meadows is a characteristic vegetation type of the forest landscapes fr om the Altai-Sayan mountains on the east to the Southern Urals on the west. Communities inhabit open sites that were formed during natural or anthropogenic dynamic of zonal forests. It is the main reason of the floristic origina­lity of the meadows, as reflected by the presence of numerous forest species. Our study is based on the analysis of 573 relevés from 27 associations represented in the previous publications. All forest meadows of the Southern Siberia and Southern Urals are included in the order Carici macrourae–Crepidetalia sibiricae Ermakov et al. 1999 (Ermakov et al., 1999). Among the differential species (d. s.) are common forest herbs: Aegopodium podagraria, Brachypodium pinnatum, Bupleurum aureum, Calamagrostis arundinacea, Crepis sibirica, Dracocephalum ruyschiana, Geranium pseudosibiricum, Hieracium umbellatum, Lilium pilosiusculum, Lupinaster pentaphyllus, Pulmonaria mollis, Rubus saxatilis. CA-ordination shows that the moisture and geographical position are the most important factors influencing the differentiation of forest meadows. Strict dissimilarity in species composition is found between 3 regions — the Altai-Sayan mountains, West Siberian Plain and Southern Urals. The order Carici macrourae–Crepidetalia sibiricae includes three regional alliances. The alliance Crepidion sibiricae Mirkin ex Ermakov, Maltseva et Makunina 1999 (d. s.: Aegopodium podagraria, Brachypodium pinnatum, Bupleurum aureum, Calamagrostis arundinacea, Crepis sibirica, Dracocephalum ruyschiana, Geranium pseudosibiricum, Hieracium umbellatum, Lilium pilosiusculum, Lupinaster pentaphyllus, Pulmonaria mollis, Rubus saxatilis) unites meadows of piedmonts and low mountains of the Altai, Kuznetsk Alatau and Salair. The alliance Heracleo sibirici–Geranion bifolii all. nov. (d.s.: Cirsium setosum, Geranium bifolium, Hera­cleum sibiricum, Poa palustris, Populus tremula, Veronica longifolia, Vicia megalotropis) occurs almost all over the southern part of the West Siberian Plain (Lashchinsky, Tishchenko, 2011; Tishchenko, 2015). The coenoses inhabit the edges of the deciduous ­forests. The alliance Polygonion krascheninnikovii Kashapov 1985 (d. s.: Bistorta major, Geum rivale, Hylotelephium triphyllum, Rumex acetosa, Stachys officinalis, Trifolium medium, Veronica chamaedrys, Viola tricolor) represents communities of the Southern Urals forest belt (Kashapov, 1985; Filinov et al., 2002; Yamalov et al., 2012). Three regional alliances of forest meadows well correspond to the syntaxonomy structure of the class Brachypodio pinnati–Betuletea pendulae Ermakov et al. 1991 with three orders — Carici macrourae–Pinetalia sylvestris Ermakov et al. 1991 (mostly Altai-Sayan mountains), Calamagrostio epigeii–Betuletalia pendulae Korolyuk ex Ermakov et al. 2000 (West Siberian Plain) and Chamaecytiso ruthenici–Pinetalia sylvestris Solomeshch et Ermakov in Ermakov et al. 2000 (Southern Ural). Ranges o","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69496463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The vegetation of the class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea fuscae Tx. 1937 in the Yanganape mountain massif area (Eastern macroslope of the Polar Urals) 阳喀纳普山地块(极地乌拉尔山脉东部大斜坡)Scheuchzerio-Caricetea fuscae Tx. 1937类植被
Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.31111/vegrus/2021.41.113
E. Lapshina, I. Filippov, V. E. Fedosov, Yu. V. Skuchas, P. Lamkowski, I. Pospelov
There are very few publications on the classification of mountain mire vegetation in Russia. Several associations in the Southern Siberia mountains (Lapshina, 1996; Lashchinsky, 2009) and the Khibiny Mountains (Koroleva, 2001) are described. Mire vegetation in the Southern Urals is relatively well studied and described in the traditions of the ecological-phytocenotic dominant classification (Ivchenko, 2013; Ivchenko, Znamenskiy, 2015) while the knowledge on that of the Northern and Sub-Polar Urals is extremely limited. There is no information about the mires in the Polar Urals.The paper presents the results of classification of the class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea fuscae of the Yanganape mountain massif (67.68°—67.75° N, 67.72°—68.00° E) and adjacent plains in the Eastern macroslope of the Polar Urals, within the southern tundra subzone. The study area is mountain massif of about 250 m a. s. l., composed of limestone outcrops, with a wavy flat (60–90 m a. s. l.) plain around (Fig. 1–2). The classification is based on 138 relevés made in July 27–August 8, 2017 (Fig. 3). Relevés of similar syntaxa, established in the north of the Western Europe and the East European tundras (Ruuhijärvi, 1960; Dierssen, 1982; Lavrinenko et al., 2016), were included in analysis. DCA and t-SNE (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding) methods were used for ordination of syntaxa in multidimensional space (Maaten, Hinton, 2008). The calculations were made using the machine learning package for Python-Scikit-learn.In total, 13 associations, 11 subassociations, 12 variants from 6 alliances and 3 orders of the class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea fuscae were identified on the relatively small (about 70 km2) area.Within the order Caricion davallianae, syntaxa of the alliance Caricion atrofuscae-saxatilis, comprising low sedge-hypnum communities on carbonate mineral and organomineral soils in the mountains of the Western Europe, were identified and described for the first time on the territory of Russia. Three new associations (Ditricho flexicauli—Caricetum redowskianae, Tomentypno nitentis–Equisetetum palustre, Tomentypno nitentis–Eriophoretum vaginati) were described on the the Yanganape mountain massif (Table 1), which significantly expands the area of the alliance to the East. Alliance’ communities have some similarities with syntaxa of zonal dwarf shrub-grass-moss tundra vegetation (Lavrinenko, Lavrinenko, 2018), but are generally well differed by the species composition and community structure (Table 5).The order Caricetalia fuscae in the Eastern macroslope of the Polar Urals is represented by 4 alliances. In addition to Drepanocladion exannulati and Sphagno-Caricion canescentis, listed in the “Classification of Vegetation of Europe” (Mucina et al., 2016), we include into order the alliance Caricion stantis — moderately rich sedge-moss fen vegetation of the Subarctic and tundra zones, and the alliance Stygio–Caricion limosae, containing extremely waterlogged meso-oligotro
关于俄罗斯山地沼泽植被分类的文献很少。南西伯利亚山脉的几个协会(Lapshina, 1996;Lashchinsky, 2009)和希比尼山脉(Koroleva, 2001)进行了描述。乌拉尔南部的沼泽植被在生态-植物群落优势分类的传统中得到了相对较好的研究和描述(Ivchenko, 2013;Ivchenko, Znamenskiy, 2015),而关于北部和亚极地乌拉尔的知识非常有限。没有关于极地乌拉尔矿的信息。本文介绍了极地乌拉尔山脉东部大斜坡区(67.68°~ 67.75°N, 67.72°~ 68.00°E)及其邻近平原的Scheuchzerio-Caricetea fuscae类的分类结果。研究区为海拔约250米的山地。,由石灰岩露头组成,周围是波浪状的平坦平原(东经60-90米)(图1-2)。该分类基于2017年7月27日至8月8日期间的138个相关的<s:2>(图3)。在西欧北部和东欧苔原地区建立的类似句法的<s:2> (Ruuhijärvi, 1960;Dierssen, 1982;Lavrinenko et al., 2016)纳入分析。使用DCA和t-SNE (t-分布随机邻居嵌入)方法在多维空间中对句法进行排序(Maaten, Hinton, 2008)。计算是使用Python-Scikit-learn的机器学习包进行的。在相对较小的面积(约70 km2)上共鉴定出13个亲缘、11个亚亲缘、6个亲缘和3个目的12个变种。在davallianae目中,由西欧山区碳酸盐矿物和有机土壤上的低莎草群落组成的Caricion atrofuscae-saxatilis联盟的syntaxa首次在俄罗斯境内被发现和描述。在Yanganape山块上描述了3个新的类群(Ditricho flexicaui - caricetum redowskianae, Tomentypno nitentis-Equisetetum palustre, Tomentypno nitentis-Eriophoretum vaginati)(表1),显著地向东扩展了类群的面积。联盟群落与地带性矮灌木-草藓苔原植被的句法类群有一定的相似性(Lavrinenko, Lavrinenko, 2018),但在物种组成和群落结构上普遍存在较大差异(表5)。极地乌拉尔东部大坡区Caricetalia fuscae目由4个联盟组成。除了“欧洲植被分类”(Mucina et al., 2016)中列出的Drepanocladion exannulati和Sphagno-Caricion canescentis外,我们还将亚北极和冻土带的中等丰富的莎草沼植被Caricion stantis和Stygio-Caricion limosae联盟纳入排序,其中包含极度缺水的中少营养和微酸性至中性低莎草沼。在Caricion stantis联盟中有4个关联,包括新草科(new ass. Scorpidio cossonii-Caricetum rariflorae)(表2)。考虑到以不同苔藓种类为主的苔藓群落的物种组成在统计学上存在显著差异(图15、5-6),从草科(ass. Drepanoclado revolventis-Caricetum chordorrhizae Osvald 1925 ex diersen 1982)中去掉了草科(ass. Scorpidio scorpioiidis - caricetum chordorrhizae)。其命名类型是唯一相关的Carex chordorrhizae-Amblistegium scorpioides-Ass。(Osvald 1925: 37),这对最初的诊断是足够的,因为它包含了丰富的物种和两个命名分类群(ICPN, 2b, 7)。这两个类群的群落都在极地乌拉尔东部大斜坡中被发现,在那里它们以新的亚类群为代表,这大大扩大了这些类群的分布区域到东部。最近在东欧苔原地区(Lavrinenko et al., 1916)被描述为Scorpidio revolventis-Caricetum rariflorae,在西欧北部也被称为Scorpidio revolventis-Caricetum rariflorae (diersen, 1982)。与西部植物群的不同之处在于,在西伯利亚西部北部的恶劣气候条件下,缺少许多北方物种,而与研究区碳酸盐土壤和富钙地下水有关的丰富的矿物质营养,使其具有大量的诊断物种-萨克萨克林(Caricion atrofuscae-saxatilis)联盟的植物群落。在两个联盟中建立了新的关联:Drepanocladion exannulati中的Carici aquatilis - warnstorfiettum tundrae和Sphagno - caricion canescentis中的Sphagno squarrosi-Caricetum chordorrhizae(表3)。 讨论了后一联盟的区系特征,其群落在其分布的北部边界与该联盟的北极苔泥植被有一定的相似性。发生在酸性栖息地的Scheuch-zerion palustris联盟的寡营养群落被置于Scheuchzerietalia palustris目中,这与Mucina等人(2016)在论文中对该联盟的新解释一致。这个联盟有两个协会(圆齿海苔-巴尔蒂海苔,圆齿海苔-圆齿海苔)。在研究区域,Scheuchzerion palustris和Stygio-Caricion limmosae联盟的相关数据很少,这就是为什么它们的分类是初步的,并且将在不久的将来在更大的数据集上考虑整个西西伯利亚北部。对所选句法进行dca排序,确认分类结果(图15,Б)。然而,t-SNE方法更清楚地展示了群落的分化,该方法允许在平面上显示多维超空间(图15,А)。
{"title":"The vegetation of the class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea fuscae Tx. 1937 in the Yanganape mountain massif area (Eastern macroslope of the Polar Urals)","authors":"E. Lapshina, I. Filippov, V. E. Fedosov, Yu. V. Skuchas, P. Lamkowski, I. Pospelov","doi":"10.31111/vegrus/2021.41.113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31111/vegrus/2021.41.113","url":null,"abstract":"There are very few publications on the classification of mountain mire vegetation in Russia. Several associations in the Southern Siberia mountains (Lapshina, 1996; Lashchinsky, 2009) and the Khibiny Mountains (Koroleva, 2001) are described. Mire vegetation in the Southern Urals is relatively well studied and described in the traditions of the ecological-phytocenotic dominant classification (Ivchenko, 2013; Ivchenko, Znamenskiy, 2015) while the knowledge on that of the Northern and Sub-Polar Urals is extremely limited. There is no information about the mires in the Polar Urals.\u0000The paper presents the results of classification of the class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea fuscae of the Yanganape mountain massif (67.68°—67.75° N, 67.72°—68.00° E) and adjacent plains in the Eastern macroslope of the Polar Urals, within the southern tundra subzone. The study area is mountain massif of about 250 m a. s. l., composed of limestone outcrops, with a wavy flat (60–90 m a. s. l.) plain around (Fig. 1–2). \u0000The classification is based on 138 relevés made in July 27–August 8, 2017 (Fig. 3). Relevés of similar syntaxa, established in the north of the Western Europe and the East European tundras (Ruuhijärvi, 1960; Dierssen, 1982; Lavrinenko et al., 2016), were included in analysis. DCA and t-SNE (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding) methods were used for ordination of syntaxa in multidimensional space (Maaten, Hinton, 2008). The calculations were made using the machine learning package for Python-Scikit-learn.\u0000In total, 13 associations, 11 subassociations, 12 variants from 6 alliances and 3 orders of the class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea fuscae were identified on the relatively small (about 70 km2) area.\u0000Within the order Caricion davallianae, syntaxa of the alliance Caricion atrofuscae-saxatilis, comprising low sedge-hypnum communities on carbonate mineral and organomineral soils in the mountains of the Western Europe, were identified and described for the first time on the territory of Russia. Three new associations (Ditricho flexicauli—Caricetum redowskianae, Tomentypno nitentis–Equisetetum palustre, Tomentypno nitentis–Eriophoretum vaginati) were described on the the Yanganape mountain massif (Table 1), which significantly expands the area of the alliance to the East. Alliance’ communities have some similarities with syntaxa of zonal dwarf shrub-grass-moss tundra vegetation (Lavrinenko, Lavrinenko, 2018), but are generally well differed by the species composition and community structure (Table 5).\u0000The order Caricetalia fuscae in the Eastern macroslope of the Polar Urals is represented by 4 alliances. In addition to Drepanocladion exannulati and Sphagno-Caricion canescentis, listed in the “Classification of Vegetation of Europe” (Mucina et al., 2016), we include into order the alliance Caricion stantis — moderately rich sedge-moss fen vegetation of the Subarctic and tundra zones, and the alliance Stygio–Caricion limosae, containing extremely waterlogged meso-oligotro","PeriodicalId":37606,"journal":{"name":"Rastitel''nost'' Rossii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69503530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Rastitel''nost'' Rossii
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1