Background and Objective
In palliative care, promoting comfort, dignity, and autonomy often requires sensitive conversations about end-of-life options, including assisted dying. Despite the increasing legalization of Medical Aid in Dying (MAID), many clinicians remain hesitant or underprepared to initiate these discussions. This narrative review clarifies how barriers to these discussions have been identified and integrates evidence-based strategies from interdisciplinary literature. This study examines the ethical imperatives and clinical significance of assisted dying communication and aims to provide practical strategies for clinicians.
Methods
A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for publications from 2010 to 2025. Search combinations included “assisted dying,” “medical aid in dying,” “physician-assisted death,” “communication,” “palliative care,” “ethics,” and “end-of-life discussion.” Studies were included if they examined clinician–patient communication about assisted dying, associated ethical considerations, or strategies for end-of-life dialogue. Findings were synthesized thematically to identify recurring barriers and communication approaches. This review analyzed previously published data and ethical analyses; no patient or identifying information was used, and ethical approval was therefore not applicable.
Results
Findings reveal persistent barriers, including legal uncertainties, cultural and religious sensitivities, clinician discomfort, and limited training in end-of-life communication. Evidence indicates that interdisciplinary team collaboration and structured communication frameworks improve confidence and patient satisfaction. These approaches improved clinician confidence, facilitated alignment of care with patient values, and increased patient satisfaction. Ethical analyses further underscore that avoiding or inadequately addressing assisted dying undermines autonomy and may compromise quality of care.
Conclusions
Engaging in open discussions about assisted dying is both a clinical responsibility and an ethical duty in palliative care. Addressing barriers through targeted training and structured communication strategies enables clinicians to approach these conversations with greater confidence and compassion. Such dialogue ensures that patient values and preferences are respected, ultimately fostering more dignified and patient-centered end-of-life care.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
