Pub Date : 2025-02-03DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101622
Julius M. Boettcher MSc , Kay Sellenschloh Dipl. Ing , Gerd Huber Dr. , Benjamin Ondruschka Professor , Michael M. Morlock Professor
Background
Primary stability is of great importance for the longevity of the implant in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty, since instability is a major cause of rerevision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an additional set of less prominent, wider splines added to an established conical stem design with sharp splines on axial stability in a model with significant proximal bone defects.
Methods
Twenty fresh-frozen human femurs were implanted with either the established or the additional spline design, dynamically loaded and tested in a load-to-failure configuration. Cortical contact in the femoral canal after implantation was evaluated by superimposing computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional laser scans. Stem subsidence and micromotion were evaluated to assess primary stability.
Results
Stems remained stable during cyclic loading of up to 200% body weight, except in bones with cortical bone mineral density below 1000 mgHA/mL. A significant reduction of more than 85% in stem subsidence (P = .040), axial micromotion (P = .007), and rotational micromotion (P = .010) was achieved with the new spline design. Load-to-failure testing exceeded 400% body weight.
Conclusions
The new spline design increased the cortical contact which resulted in increased axial primary stability in this in vitro experiment. Bone mineral density as a measure of bone quality proved to be a decisive factor for achieving immediate postoperative stability. Further variations of the established stem designs could further improve the longevity of artificial joint replacements.
{"title":"A Modified Wagner Stem Design Increases the Primary Stability in Cementless Revision Hip Arthroplasty","authors":"Julius M. Boettcher MSc , Kay Sellenschloh Dipl. Ing , Gerd Huber Dr. , Benjamin Ondruschka Professor , Michael M. Morlock Professor","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101622","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101622","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Primary stability is of great importance for the longevity of the implant in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty, since instability is a major cause of rerevision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an additional set of less prominent, wider splines added to an established conical stem design with sharp splines on axial stability in a model with significant proximal bone defects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty fresh-frozen human femurs were implanted with either the established or the additional spline design, dynamically loaded and tested in a load-to-failure configuration. Cortical contact in the femoral canal after implantation was evaluated by superimposing computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional laser scans. Stem subsidence and micromotion were evaluated to assess primary stability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Stems remained stable during cyclic loading of up to 200% body weight, except in bones with cortical bone mineral density below 1000 mgHA/mL. A significant reduction of more than 85% in stem subsidence (<em>P</em> = .040), axial micromotion (<em>P</em> = .007), and rotational micromotion (<em>P</em> = .010) was achieved with the new spline design. Load-to-failure testing exceeded 400% body weight.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The new spline design increased the cortical contact which resulted in increased axial primary stability in this in vitro experiment. Bone mineral density as a measure of bone quality proved to be a decisive factor for achieving immediate postoperative stability. Further variations of the established stem designs could further improve the longevity of artificial joint replacements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143092396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101610
Edward O’Bryan MBBS (Hons), FRACS, FAOA , Christopher Jones MBBS, FRACS, FAOA , Samuel Joseph MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthoA
Computer assistance has significantly improved precision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Current robotic systems address tibiofemoral kinematics, ignoring the patellofemoral joint. This described TKA technique allows assessment and adjustment of patellofemoral kinematics. Reproducible landmarks on the tibial tubercle, trochlea, and patella are defined. With the “Special Point” function of the CORI surgical system, arcs of points are recorded dynamically. This records trochlear groove translation, patellar tracking, patellar tilt, and tibial tubercle rotation. During implant trials, special points are recollected to determine how these four parameters have changed compared to the native knee. Component adjustments can be made to optimize patellofemoral kinematics without compromising tibiofemoral balance. This may be a tool to mitigate patellofemoral maltracking and may improve TKA outcomes. Further studies are required to investigate outcomes.
{"title":"A Novel Robotic Technique for Mapping Patellofemoral Kinematics in Total Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"Edward O’Bryan MBBS (Hons), FRACS, FAOA , Christopher Jones MBBS, FRACS, FAOA , Samuel Joseph MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthoA","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101610","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101610","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Computer assistance has significantly improved precision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Current robotic systems address tibiofemoral kinematics, ignoring the patellofemoral joint. This described TKA technique allows assessment and adjustment of patellofemoral kinematics. Reproducible landmarks on the tibial tubercle, trochlea, and patella are defined. With the “Special Point” function of the CORI surgical system, arcs of points are recorded dynamically. This records trochlear groove translation, patellar tracking, patellar tilt, and tibial tubercle rotation. During implant trials, special points are recollected to determine how these four parameters have changed compared to the native knee. Component adjustments can be made to optimize patellofemoral kinematics without compromising tibiofemoral balance. This may be a tool to mitigate patellofemoral maltracking and may improve TKA outcomes. Further studies are required to investigate outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143163660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101582
Logan E. Finger MD , Matthew F. Gong MD , Asher Mirvish BS , Alexandra S. Gabrielli MD , Ahmad P. Tafti PhD , Michael J. O’Malley MD , Brian A. Klatt MD , Johannes F. Plate MD, PhD
Background
Improvements in cementless total hip arthroplasty have been directed at optimizing osseointegration of the femoral implant to reduce aseptic loosening rates. Stem design plays a critical role in the performance of these implants. Given the increase in new stem designs and the creation of an updated classification system, improved understanding of the outcomes of each stem type is warranted. The purpose of this study was to determine overall revision rates based on stem design and proprietary model.
Methods
Joint registry data on the reported overall cases and revisions for each cementless stem brand were collected from the annual reports of the American Joint Replacement Registry (2021), United Kingdom National Joint Registry (2021), New Zealand Joint Registry (2020), and Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2021). Each individual stem brand was classified into a stem type derived from the classification system described by Radaelli et al.
Results
The most utilized stem types were (1) type B2 stems, (2) type A stems, and (3) type C1 stems. The most utilized stem models were the (1) Corail stem (B2), (2) Accolade II (type A), and (3) Taperloc 133 (type A). The highest and lowest overall revision rates observed were in the type B1 stems (8.09%) and type C3 stems (1.12%), respectively. The 3 stem models with the highest overall revision rates were the Synergy HA stem (9.04%), CBC stem (8.59%), and CLS stem (7.96%). The 3 stems with the lowest respective overall revision rates were the C2 stem (0.00%, 0 of 933 cases), Actis Duofix (0.59%), and VerSys stem (0.89%).
Conclusions
Based on consolidated large registry data, some cementless femoral stem types and models appear to perform better than others when compared on the basis of stem design.
背景:无骨水泥全髋关节置换术的改进旨在优化股骨植入物的骨整合以减少无菌性松动率。干设计在这些植入物的性能中起着关键作用。鉴于新系统设计的增加和更新分类系统的创建,有必要改进对每种系统类型结果的理解。本研究的目的是确定基于茎设计和专有模型的总体修改率。方法:从美国关节置换注册中心(2021年)、英国国家联合注册中心(2021年)、新西兰联合注册中心(2020年)和澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换注册中心(2021年)的年度报告中收集报告总体病例的联合注册数据和每个无水泥茎品牌的修订数据。根据Radaelli等人描述的分类系统,将每个单独的茎品牌划分为茎类型。结果:利用最多的茎类型是(1)B2型茎,(2)a型茎和(3)C1型茎。使用最多的茎模型是(1)Corail茎(B2), (2) Accolade II (A型)和(3)Taperloc 133 (A型)。总体修正率最高和最低的是B1型茎(8.09%)和C3型茎(1.12%)。总体修正率最高的3个主干模型分别是Synergy HA主干(9.04%)、CBC主干(8.59%)和CLS主干(7.96%)。总体翻修率最低的3个茎分别是C2茎(0.00%,933例中有0例)、Actis Duofix(0.59%)和VerSys茎(0.89%)。结论:基于合并的大型注册数据,在基于茎设计的比较中,一些无骨水泥的股骨干类型和模型似乎比其他类型和模型表现更好。
{"title":"Performance of Cementless Hip Arthroplasty Stem Types Based on Consolidated Large Registry Data","authors":"Logan E. Finger MD , Matthew F. Gong MD , Asher Mirvish BS , Alexandra S. Gabrielli MD , Ahmad P. Tafti PhD , Michael J. O’Malley MD , Brian A. Klatt MD , Johannes F. Plate MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101582","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101582","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Improvements in cementless total hip arthroplasty have been directed at optimizing osseointegration of the femoral implant to reduce aseptic loosening rates. Stem design plays a critical role in the performance of these implants. Given the increase in new stem designs and the creation of an updated classification system, improved understanding of the outcomes of each stem type is warranted. The purpose of this study was to determine overall revision rates based on stem design and proprietary model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Joint registry data on the reported overall cases and revisions for each cementless stem brand were collected from the annual reports of the American Joint Replacement Registry (2021), United Kingdom National Joint Registry (2021), New Zealand Joint Registry (2020), and Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2021). Each individual stem brand was classified into a stem type derived from the classification system described by Radaelli et al.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most utilized stem types were (1) type B2 stems, (2) type A stems, and (3) type C1 stems. The most utilized stem models were the (1) Corail stem (B2), (2) Accolade II (type A), and (3) Taperloc 133 (type A). The highest and lowest overall revision rates observed were in the type B1 stems (8.09%) and type C3 stems (1.12%), respectively. The 3 stem models with the highest overall revision rates were the Synergy HA stem (9.04%), CBC stem (8.59%), and CLS stem (7.96%). The 3 stems with the lowest respective overall revision rates were the C2 stem (0.00%, 0 of 933 cases), Actis Duofix (0.59%), and VerSys stem (0.89%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on consolidated large registry data, some cementless femoral stem types and models appear to perform better than others when compared on the basis of stem design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101582"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715119/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142972512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101608
Arash Sharafat Vaziri MD , Mohammad Naghi Tahmasebi MD , Hoseinali Hadi MD , Sina Javidmehr MD , Sohrab Keyhani MD , Zahra Vahdati MD , Hossein Nematian MD , Yalda Farahmand MD
Background
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of our modified cementing technique in reducing the rate of aseptic tibial loosening focusing on its relationship with keel length.
Methods
Every participant who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between August 2014 and September 2022 with a minimum of 4-year follow-up using 1 of 3 implants were included: Persona + conventional cementing technique; Persona + modified cementing technique; and NexGen LPS-Flex. The modifications applied include better preparation of the bone surfaces and the cancellous bone cavities, pressurizing the cement and interstitial fluid suction at the same time, applying a layer of cement on the surfaces of the tibia and implant, and immobilizing the limb. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate survivorship.
Results
A total of 988 of 1039 primary TKAs (95.1%) were included with follow-up of 89.26 ± 7.32 months. Twenty eight (2.83%) TKA required revisions due to aseptic tibial loosening; 3 (1.1%) in the NexGen group, 21 (6.9%) in the conventionally cemented Persona group, and 4 (0.9%) within the modified cemented Persona group. Aseptic loosening occurred at a mean of 69.00 ± 2.65, 34.57 ± 22.90, and 68.50 ± 3.42, respectively. Survivorship for aseptic loosening was 98.9%, 93.1%, and 99.1% at 8 years, respectively. The revision rate for early (during the first 24 months) aseptic loosening was 4.6% in the conventionally cemented Persona group. No early aseptic loosening reported in other 2 groups.
Conclusions
In conclusion, meticulous cementing techniques can reduce the rate of tibial loosening in shorter keel designs.
{"title":"The Impact of Cementing Techniques on Implant Longevity in Relation to Keel Length in Persona and NexGen Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Study","authors":"Arash Sharafat Vaziri MD , Mohammad Naghi Tahmasebi MD , Hoseinali Hadi MD , Sina Javidmehr MD , Sohrab Keyhani MD , Zahra Vahdati MD , Hossein Nematian MD , Yalda Farahmand MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101608","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101608","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of our modified cementing technique in reducing the rate of aseptic tibial loosening focusing on its relationship with keel length.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Every participant who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between August 2014 and September 2022 with a minimum of 4-year follow-up using 1 of 3 implants were included: Persona + conventional cementing technique; Persona + modified cementing technique; and NexGen LPS-Flex. The modifications applied include better preparation of the bone surfaces and the cancellous bone cavities, pressurizing the cement and interstitial fluid suction at the same time, applying a layer of cement on the surfaces of the tibia and implant, and immobilizing the limb. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate survivorship.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 988 of 1039 primary TKAs (95.1%) were included with follow-up of 89.26 ± 7.32 months. Twenty eight (2.83%) TKA required revisions due to aseptic tibial loosening; 3 (1.1%) in the NexGen group, 21 (6.9%) in the conventionally cemented Persona group, and 4 (0.9%) within the modified cemented Persona group. Aseptic loosening occurred at a mean of 69.00 ± 2.65, 34.57 ± 22.90, and 68.50 ± 3.42, respectively. Survivorship for aseptic loosening was 98.9%, 93.1%, and 99.1% at 8 years, respectively. The revision rate for early (during the first 24 months) aseptic loosening was 4.6% in the conventionally cemented Persona group. No early aseptic loosening reported in other 2 groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, meticulous cementing techniques can reduce the rate of tibial loosening in shorter keel designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101608"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787453/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143081126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101611
Aaron Singh BA, Travis M. Kotzur BS, Kathleen Lundquist MD, Blaire C. Peterson BS, William H. Young MD, Chance C. Moore MD, Frank Buttacavoli MD
Background
Many patients require total knee arthroplasty (TKA) bilaterally; however, there is limited data on bilateral procedures. This study aims to compare medical and surgical complications and hospital-related outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA. We hypothesize that staged procedures will have superior outcomes.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study queried the National Readmissions Database, years 2016-2020, for patients undergoing bilateral TKA via ICD-10 codes. For patients undergoing staged procedures, outcomes were compared in aggregate for comparison to simultaneous operations. Multivariate regression was performed to assess complications. Negative binomial regression was utilized for 30-day readmission, reoperation, and discharge disposition. Quasi-Poisson regression was performed to assess total charges. Demographics and comorbidities, measured via Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, were controlled for in our analysis.
Results
A total of 210,682 patients, 89,568 (42.51%) undergoing simultaneous bilateral and 121,115 (57.49%) undergoing staged bilateral TKA, were included. The staged cohort had higher odds of medical complications (odds ratio (OR), 1.14; P < .001), reduced surgical complications (OR, 0.51; P < .001), and increased odds of routine discharges (OR, 1.39; P < .001). They also had increased odds of readmission (OR, 1.25; P < .001), reoperation (OR, 1.56; P < .001), and greater total charges (OR, 1.18; P < .001).
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that, for some patients, simultaneous procedures may be a viable option. While staged operations were associated with reduced surgical complications and resulted in better discharge dispositions, they were also associated with greater medical complications, readmissions, reoperations, and total cost. Surgeons should consider individual patient risks and preferences when planning bilateral TKA.
{"title":"Simultaneous vs Staged Procedures for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Reduced Infection, Cost, and Readmission Rates Associated With Simultaneous Procedures","authors":"Aaron Singh BA, Travis M. Kotzur BS, Kathleen Lundquist MD, Blaire C. Peterson BS, William H. Young MD, Chance C. Moore MD, Frank Buttacavoli MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101611","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101611","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many patients require total knee arthroplasty (TKA) bilaterally; however, there is limited data on bilateral procedures. This study aims to compare medical and surgical complications and hospital-related outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA. We hypothesize that staged procedures will have superior outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study queried the National Readmissions Database, years 2016-2020, for patients undergoing bilateral TKA via <em>ICD-10</em> codes. For patients undergoing staged procedures, outcomes were compared in aggregate for comparison to simultaneous operations. Multivariate regression was performed to assess complications. Negative binomial regression was utilized for 30-day readmission, reoperation, and discharge disposition. Quasi-Poisson regression was performed to assess total charges. Demographics and comorbidities, measured via Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, were controlled for in our analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 210,682 patients, 89,568 (42.51%) undergoing simultaneous bilateral and 121,115 (57.49%) undergoing staged bilateral TKA, were included. The staged cohort had higher odds of medical complications (odds ratio (OR), 1.14; <em>P</em> < .001), reduced surgical complications (OR, 0.51; <em>P</em> < .001), and increased odds of routine discharges (OR, 1.39; <em>P</em> < .001). They also had increased odds of readmission (OR, 1.25; <em>P</em> < .001), reoperation (OR, 1.56; <em>P</em> < .001), and greater total charges (OR, 1.18; <em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results demonstrate that, for some patients, simultaneous procedures may be a viable option. While staged operations were associated with reduced surgical complications and resulted in better discharge dispositions, they were also associated with greater medical complications, readmissions, reoperations, and total cost. Surgeons should consider individual patient risks and preferences when planning bilateral TKA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770484/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143053697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101639
Brett R. Levine MD, MS (Editor-in-Chief)
{"title":"A Tribute to Greg J. Golladay, MD, FAOA: Big Shoes to Fill!","authors":"Brett R. Levine MD, MS (Editor-in-Chief)","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101639","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101639","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143349618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) represents the single largest procedural cost for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) remains a primary driver of post-acute care costs. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a decrease in number of discharges to SNFs. Examining preoperative patient characteristics of those who are still admitted to SNFs, despite cultural shifts, may help providers identify patients still at high risk for SNF discharge.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who had elective total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty from January through December 2022 at a high-volume orthopaedic institute. Preoperative patient-reported outcome scores, demographics, and clinical characteristics were collected from patient charts and compared between patients who were discharged home vs SNF. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine potential predictors for discharge to SNF.
Results
In the total sample (N = 2795), 96.4% of patients were discharged home, and 3.6% were discharged to a SNF. Medicare insurance was associated with being discharged to a SNF (P < .05), while having commercial insurance was associated with being discharged home (P < .05). Being older, having longer procedure length, longer hospital length of stay, and a lower preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS 10) score were significant predictors of discharge to SNF (P < .05).
Conclusions
This was the first study to identify PROMIS 10 score as a potential predictor of discharge to a SNF after TJA. Findings from this study may help providers redefine contemporary predictors of SNF admission following TJA.
{"title":"A Contemporary Analysis of Discharge Disposition Following Total Joint Arthroplasty","authors":"Swaroopa Vaidya MS , Gregory Panza PhD , Jake Laverdiere BS , Dianne Vye MSN, RN, ONC , Jenna Bernstein MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101592","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101592","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) represents the single largest procedural cost for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) remains a primary driver of post-acute care costs. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a decrease in number of discharges to SNFs. Examining preoperative patient characteristics of those who are still admitted to SNFs, despite cultural shifts, may help providers identify patients still at high risk for SNF discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients who had elective total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty from January through December 2022 at a high-volume orthopaedic institute. Preoperative patient-reported outcome scores, demographics, and clinical characteristics were collected from patient charts and compared between patients who were discharged home vs SNF. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine potential predictors for discharge to SNF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the total sample (<em>N</em> = 2795), 96.4% of patients were discharged home, and 3.6% were discharged to a SNF. Medicare insurance was associated with being discharged to a SNF (<em>P</em> < .05), while having commercial insurance was associated with being discharged home (<em>P</em> < .05). Being older, having longer procedure length, longer hospital length of stay, and a lower preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS 10) score were significant predictors of discharge to SNF (<em>P</em> < .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This was the first study to identify PROMIS 10 score as a potential predictor of discharge to a SNF after TJA. Findings from this study may help providers redefine contemporary predictors of SNF admission following TJA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101592"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715114/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142972511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101596
Salar Sobhi BSc, MD , Alan Kop MSc, PhD , Moreica Pabbruwe PhD , Christopher W. Jones BCom, BEng(Hons), MBBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS, FAOrthA , Michael A. Finsterwald MD, FMH, FRACS, FAOrthA
Background
Dual mobility (DM) implants in total hip arthroplasty provide excellent range of motion with low dislocation rates. A complication of this design is intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), where the polyethylene (PE) liner dissociates from the femoral head. In older designs, IPD occurred due to a small head size and late PE wear with head-capture-mechanism failure. Routine retrieval analysis identified concerns regarding IPD of modern implants, and scant reporting in the literature led to this retrospective study.
Methods
A total of 124 (110 primary, 14 revision) DM implants (mean in situ time 2.0 ± 3.1 years) revised by 20 surgeons across Western Australia between July 2014 and August 2023 were assessed. Demographics, clinical information, mechanisms of failure, and observations at revision arthroplasty were analyzed. The retrieval analysis included an assessment of metal and PE wear mechanisms, corrosion between modular components, and extent of bony attachment to acetabular shells.
Results
There were 11 cases of IPD. Of these, 8 (73%) had a documented preceding failed closed reduction, with the remaining 3 revised due to trunnionosis, loosening, and joint instability. Nine out of 11 (82%) cases were female. Although metallic wear and inner-lip impingement of PE bearings were observed, there was no obvious failure mechanism for the other 3 retrieved IPD implants.
Conclusions
Most cases of IPD in DM implants occur after failed closed reduction in the setting of a hip dislocation, suggesting an iatrogenic cause of IPD. No implant-related features could be defined for the remaining cases. Recognizing common failure modes can help with the prevention and treatment of this complication.
{"title":"Intraprosthetic Dislocation Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis Study","authors":"Salar Sobhi BSc, MD , Alan Kop MSc, PhD , Moreica Pabbruwe PhD , Christopher W. Jones BCom, BEng(Hons), MBBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS, FAOrthA , Michael A. Finsterwald MD, FMH, FRACS, FAOrthA","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101596","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101596","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dual mobility (DM) implants in total hip arthroplasty provide excellent range of motion with low dislocation rates. A complication of this design is intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), where the polyethylene (PE) liner dissociates from the femoral head. In older designs, IPD occurred due to a small head size and late PE wear with head-capture-mechanism failure. Routine retrieval analysis identified concerns regarding IPD of modern implants, and scant reporting in the literature led to this retrospective study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 124 (110 primary, 14 revision) DM implants (mean in situ time 2.0 ± 3.1 years) revised by 20 surgeons across Western Australia between July 2014 and August 2023 were assessed. Demographics, clinical information, mechanisms of failure, and observations at revision arthroplasty were analyzed. The retrieval analysis included an assessment of metal and PE wear mechanisms, corrosion between modular components, and extent of bony attachment to acetabular shells.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 11 cases of IPD. Of these, 8 (73%) had a documented preceding failed closed reduction, with the remaining 3 revised due to trunnionosis, loosening, and joint instability. Nine out of 11 (82%) cases were female. Although metallic wear and inner-lip impingement of PE bearings were observed, there was no obvious failure mechanism for the other 3 retrieved IPD implants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most cases of IPD in DM implants occur after failed closed reduction in the setting of a hip dislocation, suggesting an iatrogenic cause of IPD. No implant-related features could be defined for the remaining cases. Recognizing common failure modes can help with the prevention and treatment of this complication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732184/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101590
Koorosh Kashanian BMSc , Matey Juric BSc , Tim Ramsay PhD , Pascal Fallavollita PhD , Paul E. Beaulé MD, FAAOS, FRCSC
Background
With increasing demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), maximizing operating room (OR) efficiency is critical. This paper sought to examine the implementation of time benchmarks when performing primary TKA and THA. We hypothesized that implementing benchmarks would improve efficiency and the number of joints performed per day.
Methods
Two hundred ninety-five patients from 59 OR days were reviewed. All surgeries were performed as outpatients and included 160 females and 135 males; 161 TKA and 134 THA; mean age, 66.1; mean body mass index, 28.6 kg/m2; American Society of Anesthesia, 2. Time points, demographics, and adverse events were recorded. Benchmarks to complete 4 joints in 8 h were: anesthesia preparation time (APT) of <11 min, procedure time of <72 min, anesthesia finish time (AFT) of <21 min, and turnover of <22 min.
Results
The percentage of cases meeting individual benchmarks for APT was 50.17%; procedure time was 95.25%; AFT was 99.67%; turnover was 65.25%. The means were: APT 11:00 min, Surgical Prep Time 9:00 min, procedure time 55:00 min, AFT 3:00 min, and turnover 19:00 min. Overall, 98.3% (58/59) of ORs had 4 cases completed within 8 h and 52.5% (31/59) had 5 cases within 8 h. Age, body mass index, and consecutive laterality of surgery were determined to affect the likelihood of meeting benchmarks for case time, APT, and turnover.
Conclusions
Establishing time benchmarks permitted the introduction of 5 joint days within an 8-h OR without increasing resource utilization. Factors that influence OR efficiency for high-volume primary hip and knee replacements were identified.
{"title":"Optimizing Operating Room Efficiency for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Performance Benchmarks","authors":"Koorosh Kashanian BMSc , Matey Juric BSc , Tim Ramsay PhD , Pascal Fallavollita PhD , Paul E. Beaulé MD, FAAOS, FRCSC","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101590","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101590","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With increasing demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), maximizing operating room (OR) efficiency is critical. This paper sought to examine the implementation of time benchmarks when performing primary TKA and THA. We hypothesized that implementing benchmarks would improve efficiency and the number of joints performed per day.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two hundred ninety-five patients from 59 OR days were reviewed. All surgeries were performed as outpatients and included 160 females and 135 males; 161 TKA and 134 THA; mean age, 66.1; mean body mass index, 28.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; American Society of Anesthesia, 2. Time points, demographics, and adverse events were recorded. Benchmarks to complete 4 joints in 8 h were: anesthesia preparation time (APT) of <11 min, procedure time of <72 min, anesthesia finish time (AFT) of <21 min, and turnover of <22 min.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The percentage of cases meeting individual benchmarks for APT was 50.17%; procedure time was 95.25%; AFT was 99.67%; turnover was 65.25%. The means were: APT 11:00 min, Surgical Prep Time 9:00 min, procedure time 55:00 min, AFT 3:00 min, and turnover 19:00 min. Overall, 98.3% (58/59) of ORs had 4 cases completed within 8 h and 52.5% (31/59) had 5 cases within 8 h. Age, body mass index, and consecutive laterality of surgery were determined to affect the likelihood of meeting benchmarks for case time, APT, and turnover.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Establishing time benchmarks permitted the introduction of 5 joint days within an 8-h OR without increasing resource utilization. Factors that influence OR efficiency for high-volume primary hip and knee replacements were identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732218/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101602
Jeffrey S. Mun BA , Matthew W. Parry MD, MS , Alex Tang MD , Jesse J. Manikowski MS , Cory Crinella PA-C , John J. Mercuri MD, MA
Background
Patients who “no-show” (NS) clinical appointments are at a higher risk of poor healthcare outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate and characterize the relationship between patient NS prior to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 90-day complication risk after THA.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 4147 patients undergoing primary THA. Patients were divided based on whether they NS at least 1 appointment vs always attend (AA) appointments. Information collected included number of NS and attended appointments, demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day postoperative complications. Regression analyses were run to identify relationships between NS status and postoperative outcomes, as well as factors that would predict NS status.
Results
Compared to AA patients, NS patients had an increased odds of a postoperative complication (odds ratio:1.3, P = .0005), specifically postoperative anemia (odds ratio: 1.3, P = .0004). When comparing NS and AA patients who both experienced postoperative anemia-related complications, the NS patients had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss compared to AA patients (mean ± standard deviation: 412.6 mL ± 310.2 vs 357.3 mL ± 269.0, P = .028). NS patients also had a greater rate of symptomatic anemia compared to AA patients (100 [3%] vs 25 cases [2%], P = .018). Age, smoking status, gender, race, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and insurance status were independent predictors of missing clinical appointments.
Conclusions
There was an increased risk for complications, specifically anemia-related complications, in THA patients who NS preoperatively. Demographic factors were independently associated with higher odds of missing a scheduled clinical appointment. The results suggest orthopedic surgeons should consider NS data to pre-emptively assess risk for complications following THA.
Level of Evidence
Level III.
{"title":"Patient “No-Show” Prior to Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Increases Risk of Postoperative Anemia","authors":"Jeffrey S. Mun BA , Matthew W. Parry MD, MS , Alex Tang MD , Jesse J. Manikowski MS , Cory Crinella PA-C , John J. Mercuri MD, MA","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101602","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101602","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients who “no-show” (NS) clinical appointments are at a higher risk of poor healthcare outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate and characterize the relationship between patient NS prior to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 90-day complication risk after THA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 4147 patients undergoing primary THA. Patients were divided based on whether they NS at least 1 appointment vs always attend (AA) appointments. Information collected included number of NS and attended appointments, demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day postoperative complications. Regression analyses were run to identify relationships between NS status and postoperative outcomes, as well as factors that would predict NS status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to AA patients, NS patients had an increased odds of a postoperative complication (odds ratio:1.3, <em>P</em> = .0005), specifically postoperative anemia (odds ratio: 1.3, <em>P</em> = .0004). When comparing NS and AA patients who both experienced postoperative anemia-related complications, the NS patients had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss compared to AA patients (mean ± standard deviation: 412.6 mL ± 310.2 vs 357.3 mL ± 269.0, <em>P</em> = .028). NS patients also had a greater rate of symptomatic anemia compared to AA patients (100 [3%] vs 25 cases [2%], <em>P</em> = .018). Age, smoking status, gender, race, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and insurance status were independent predictors of missing clinical appointments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was an increased risk for complications, specifically anemia-related complications, in THA patients who NS preoperatively. Demographic factors were independently associated with higher odds of missing a scheduled clinical appointment. The results suggest orthopedic surgeons should consider NS data to pre-emptively assess risk for complications following THA.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754156/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143029754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}