Pub Date : 2025-06-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00426
Hugo Morão
This study examines the macroeconomic impact of policy uncertainty in climate decision-making. It employs data mining to 23 Portuguese news sources to construct a novel monthly Climate Policy Uncertainty (CPU) series, which is then used in a Structural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) model to analyze its macroeconomic effects. These responses collectively reveal significant economic restructuring in response to climate policy uncertainty. The combination of reduced industrial production and increased unemployment suggests substantial supply-side adjustment costs during the transition. However, the positive stock market response indicates that financial markets view these changes as ultimately beneficial for certain sectors, particularly those aligned with environmental sustainability.
{"title":"The macroeconomic effects of climate policy uncertainty: Evidence from Portugal","authors":"Hugo Morão","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00426","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00426","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the macroeconomic impact of policy uncertainty in climate decision-making. It employs data mining to 23 Portuguese news sources to construct a novel monthly Climate Policy Uncertainty (CPU) series, which is then used in a Structural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) model to analyze its macroeconomic effects. These responses collectively reveal significant economic restructuring in response to climate policy uncertainty. The combination of reduced industrial production and increased unemployment suggests substantial supply-side adjustment costs during the transition. However, the positive stock market response indicates that financial markets view these changes as ultimately beneficial for certain sectors, particularly those aligned with environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article e00426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144312639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The limited number of studies that have assessed the impact of debt on income inequality have used data at the aggregate country level. In this paper, when we use aggregate data from the U.S., we do not find much of a significant effect. However, when we use data from each of the states in the U.S., we find short-run (but not long-run) effects. By then assuming that the effects of debt on GINI (inequality measure) could be asymmetric, we employ a nonlinear ARDL modeling approach and find that in the long run, reducing national debt in the U.S. could reduce income inequality in most states.
{"title":"On the link between U.S. national debt and income distribution: Asymmetric evidence from state level data","authors":"Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee , Mehrnoosh Hasanzade , Huseyin Karamelikli","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00428","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00428","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The limited number of studies that have assessed the impact of debt on income inequality have used data at the aggregate country level. In this paper, when we use aggregate data from the U.S., we do not find much of a significant effect. However, when we use data from each of the states in the U.S., we find short-run (but not long-run) effects. By then assuming that the effects of debt on GINI (inequality measure) could be asymmetric, we employ a nonlinear ARDL modeling approach and find that in the long run, reducing national debt in the U.S. could reduce income inequality in most states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article e00428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144270572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00427
Chokri Zehri , Abdullah Alsadan , Latifa Saleh ben Ammar
This study investigates the system-wide consequences of rising geopolitical risks (GPR) on global energy trade, emphasizing asymmetric vulnerabilities between emerging market economies (EMEs) and advanced economies (AEs)—a critical gap in existing scholarship. Combining autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) modeling and impulse response analyses on 55 countries (1990–2023), we assess how geopolitical tensions disrupt energy trade dynamics, accounting for global volatility and domestic economic conditions. Our findings uncover marked asymmetries: while geopolitical risks persistently suppress energy trade, with long-term effects outweighing transient shocks, EMEs are disproportionately destabilized due to their heavy reliance on energy exports and weaker institutional capacity. AEs, conversely, demonstrate greater resilience through diversified economies, strategic reserves, and policy flexibility, though post-2008 geopolitical fragmentation and financial instability intensify disruptions across all economies. Impulse response simulations reveal that geopolitical shocks trigger sharper declines in energy trade flows for EMEs, with steeper and more prolonged contractions than AEs. Compounding these unequal burdens, escalating trade taxes strain EMEs’ fiscal stability and energy security, whereas AEs deploy fiscal buffers to cushion shocks. By exposing how geopolitical risks cascade through energy systems, the study underscores the urgency of multilateral cooperation to address structurally embedded asymmetries, particularly the fragility of EMEs in global energy frameworks.
{"title":"Asymmetric impacts of geopolitical risks on energy Trade: Divergent vulnerabilities in emerging vs. advanced economies","authors":"Chokri Zehri , Abdullah Alsadan , Latifa Saleh ben Ammar","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00427","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00427","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the system-wide consequences of rising geopolitical risks (GPR) on global energy trade, emphasizing asymmetric vulnerabilities between emerging market economies (EMEs) and advanced economies (AEs)—a critical gap in existing scholarship. Combining autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) modeling and impulse response analyses on 55 countries (1990–2023), we assess how geopolitical tensions disrupt energy trade dynamics, accounting for global volatility and domestic economic conditions. Our findings uncover marked asymmetries: while geopolitical risks persistently suppress energy trade, with long-term effects outweighing transient shocks, EMEs are disproportionately destabilized due to their heavy reliance on energy exports and weaker institutional capacity. AEs, conversely, demonstrate greater resilience through diversified economies, strategic reserves, and policy flexibility, though post-2008 geopolitical fragmentation and financial instability intensify disruptions across all economies. Impulse response simulations reveal that geopolitical shocks trigger sharper declines in energy trade flows for EMEs, with steeper and more prolonged contractions than AEs. Compounding these unequal burdens, escalating trade taxes strain EMEs’ fiscal stability and energy security, whereas AEs deploy fiscal buffers to cushion shocks. By exposing how geopolitical risks cascade through energy systems, the study underscores the urgency of multilateral cooperation to address structurally embedded asymmetries, particularly the fragility of EMEs in global energy frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article e00427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144242925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-17DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00425
António Afonso , José Alves , João Jalles , Sofia Monteiro
This paper investigates the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR) and global uncertainty (WUI) on energy prices across 185 economies from 1980 to 2023, while accounting for the role of exchange rate regimes. Using a panel fixed-effects model and a panel SVAR framework, we examine whether uncertainty shocks translate into energy price inflation and how exchange rate regimes influence these dynamics. The results indicate that geopolitical risk and global uncertainty have significant effects on energy prices, with stronger price reactions under flexible exchange rate regimes. We further decompose the effects by country classification, revealing that oil-exporting economies and emerging markets exhibit distinct responses. Our findings highlight the importance of exchange rate policies in mitigating uncertainty-driven energy price volatility. The paper contributes to the literature by providing a global empirical perspective on uncertainty-energy price interactions, with relevant implications for policymakers managing exchange rate regimes and energy market stability.
{"title":"Energy price dynamics in the face of uncertainty shocks and the role of exchange rate regimes: A global cross-country analysis","authors":"António Afonso , José Alves , João Jalles , Sofia Monteiro","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00425","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00425","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR) and global uncertainty (WUI) on energy prices across 185 economies from 1980 to 2023, while accounting for the role of exchange rate regimes. Using a panel fixed-effects model and a panel SVAR framework, we examine whether uncertainty shocks translate into energy price inflation and how exchange rate regimes influence these dynamics. The results indicate that geopolitical risk and global uncertainty have significant effects on energy prices, with stronger price reactions under flexible exchange rate regimes. We further decompose the effects by country classification, revealing that oil-exporting economies and emerging markets exhibit distinct responses. Our findings highlight the importance of exchange rate policies in mitigating uncertainty-driven energy price volatility. The paper contributes to the literature by providing a global empirical perspective on uncertainty-energy price interactions, with relevant implications for policymakers managing exchange rate regimes and energy market stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article e00425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144069755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-13DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00421
Apostolos Kiohos , Nikolaos Stoupos
The far-reaching impacts of the euro's introduction in 1999 have reshaped Europe's monetary landscape, extending integration even to non-euro economies. The primary aim of this paper is to examine whether the non-euro European economies are monetarily linked to the Euro Area. Using economic indicators from nine European countries, alongside the Eurozone, and employing SVECM models, this research assesses the degree of monetary integration. The empirical findings strongly indicate that the economies of Poland, Romania, Sweden and Norway have been positively bound and highly integrated with the Eurozone since the euro's launch. Moreover, the economies of Czechia and Hungary have demonstrated a steady and increasing level of monetary integration with the Eurozone over time. In contrast, the economies of Iceland, Switzerland, and the UK exhibit monetary divergence from the Eurozone. Based on these findings, the research proposes that Poland and Romania may need to explore the possibility of joining the Euro Area, while Norway and Sweden may (re)consider their stance on potential EU or EMU membership, respectively. The results underscore that the creation of the Eurozone and the circulation of the euro have played a significant role in facilitating and advancing monetary integration across Europe.
{"title":"Monetary alignment or divergence? - Exchange rates and economic dynamics in non-euro European countries","authors":"Apostolos Kiohos , Nikolaos Stoupos","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00421","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00421","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The far-reaching impacts of the euro's introduction in 1999 have reshaped Europe's monetary landscape, extending integration even to non-euro economies. The primary aim of this paper is to examine whether the non-euro European economies are monetarily linked to the Euro Area. Using economic indicators from nine European countries, alongside the Eurozone, and employing SVECM models, this research assesses the degree of monetary integration. The empirical findings strongly indicate that the economies of Poland, Romania, Sweden and Norway have been positively bound and highly integrated with the Eurozone since the euro's launch. Moreover, the economies of Czechia and Hungary have demonstrated a steady and increasing level of monetary integration with the Eurozone over time. In contrast, the economies of Iceland, Switzerland, and the UK exhibit monetary divergence from the Eurozone. Based on these findings, the research proposes that Poland and Romania may need to explore the possibility of joining the Euro Area, while Norway and Sweden may (re)consider their stance on potential EU or EMU membership, respectively. The results underscore that the creation of the Eurozone and the circulation of the euro have played a significant role in facilitating and advancing monetary integration across Europe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article e00421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143935686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00416
Sami Kallal
The objective of this paper is to analyze the time-varying effect of improving fiscal countercyclicality on growth for a sample of 35 developing countries over the period 1990–2019. By estimating a time-varying coefficient for fiscal countercyclicality, incorporated as a variable in a panel model, we first examine how the public debt ratio and electoral motivations influence the ability to adopt countercyclical policies. Secondly, we show that greater countercyclicality positively affects economic growth and contributes to reducing the output gap, particularly during recessions, by channeling production towards its potential path. Finally, our findings are confirmed across two sub-samples, demonstrating a positive effect on growth before the 2008 crisis and a reduction in the output gap both before and after the crisis. The effect is stronger in the sub-sample characterized by high income, low debt, and strong control of corruption, suggesting that the effectiveness of countercyclical policies depends on macroeconomic and institutional factors.
Countercyclical fiscal management should therefore be given greater consideration by fiscal policymakers in developing countries, both upstream and downstream.
{"title":"Is fiscal countercyclicality growth enhancing? Evidence from developing countries over the period 1990–2019","authors":"Sami Kallal","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00416","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00416","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this paper is to analyze the time-varying effect of improving fiscal countercyclicality on growth for a sample of 35 developing countries over the period 1990–2019. By estimating a time-varying coefficient for fiscal countercyclicality, incorporated as a variable in a panel model, we first examine how the public debt ratio and electoral motivations influence the ability to adopt countercyclical policies. Secondly, we show that greater countercyclicality positively affects economic growth and contributes to reducing the output gap, particularly during recessions, by channeling production towards its potential path. Finally, our findings are confirmed across two sub-samples, demonstrating a positive effect on growth before the 2008 crisis and a reduction in the output gap both before and after the crisis. The effect is stronger in the sub-sample characterized by high income, low debt, and strong control of corruption, suggesting that the effectiveness of countercyclical policies depends on macroeconomic and institutional factors.</div><div>Countercyclical fiscal management should therefore be given greater consideration by fiscal policymakers in developing countries, both upstream and downstream.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article e00416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143907025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-02DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00419
Marco Amendola
This paper contributes to the literature on economic convergence by exploring an overlooked aspect: the potential heterogeneity of convergence processes across different segments of the income distribution. While previous analyses have typically focused on per capita income or GDP, this study adopts a more granular perspective by examining convergence at per capita income deciles. Drawing on data from 25 countries spanning 1980 to 2019, the analysis reveals a distinct pattern of divergence in the convergence process: higher-income deciles exhibit stronger convergence than lower-income ones, with this divergence widening in recent decades. These findings highlight the uneven nature of economic convergence, demonstrating that reducing cross-country income disparities is especially challenging for low-income groups — those most in need of improved well-being and economic catch-up.
{"title":"Does economic convergence diverge along the income distribution? Evidence from a decile-based analysis","authors":"Marco Amendola","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00419","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00419","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper contributes to the literature on economic convergence by exploring an overlooked aspect: the potential heterogeneity of convergence processes across different segments of the income distribution. While previous analyses have typically focused on per capita income or GDP, this study adopts a more granular perspective by examining convergence at per capita income deciles. Drawing on data from 25 countries spanning 1980 to 2019, the analysis reveals a distinct pattern of divergence in the convergence process: higher-income deciles exhibit stronger convergence than lower-income ones, with this divergence widening in recent decades. These findings highlight the uneven nature of economic convergence, demonstrating that reducing cross-country income disparities is especially challenging for low-income groups — those most in need of improved well-being and economic catch-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article e00419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143895403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-26DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00420
Chiara Oldani , Giovanni S.F. Bruno , Marcello Signorelli
This paper investigates the existence of bubbles in the daily prices of the most popular cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), and Ripple (XRP), employing the recursive methods of Phillips et al. (2015) and Phillips et al. (2011) for testing and date-stamping episodes of exuberant behaviour over a period spanning seven years (2018–2024), including the COVID-19 pandemic crisis (2020–2021). The critical values of the tests are computed through the composite wild bootstrap technique by Phillips and Shi (2020) to make them robust to time-varying unconditional heteroscedasticity and the multiplicity issue in recursive tests. Results indicate that the prices of the most popular cryptocurrencies traded on decentralized ledgers, BTC and ETH, exhibited multiple episodes of exuberant behaviour, unambiguously for BTC and depending on the tests for ETH. Bubbles detected in the prices of BTC were due to the halving of the crypto, to market exuberance and to the pandemic crisis; bubbles detected on ETH prices were due to the launch of NFTs on the Ethereum blockchain, and to the change in investors’ expectations (from exuberant to pessimistic); the change in the stance of monetary policy burst the bubbles of BTC and ETH prices in 2024. No test supports the exuberance of XRP that is traded on a centralized ledger; weekly data confirm the absence of multiple bubbles. By looking at the presence of bubbles in these different digital ecosystems, we also consider how the technological differences can impact, possibly asymmetrically, bubbles' formation.
{"title":"Collapsing bubbles in the prices of cryptocurrencies","authors":"Chiara Oldani , Giovanni S.F. Bruno , Marcello Signorelli","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00420","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00420","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the existence of bubbles in the daily prices of the most popular cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), and Ripple (XRP), employing the recursive methods of Phillips et al. (2015) and Phillips et al. (2011) for testing and date-stamping episodes of exuberant behaviour over a period spanning seven years (2018–2024), including the COVID-19 pandemic crisis (2020–2021). The critical values of the tests are computed through the composite wild bootstrap technique by Phillips and Shi (2020) to make them robust to time-varying unconditional heteroscedasticity and the multiplicity issue in recursive tests. Results indicate that the prices of the most popular cryptocurrencies traded on decentralized ledgers, BTC and ETH, exhibited multiple episodes of exuberant behaviour, unambiguously for BTC and depending on the tests for ETH. Bubbles detected in the prices of BTC were due to the halving of the crypto, to market exuberance and to the pandemic crisis; bubbles detected on ETH prices were due to the launch of NFTs on the Ethereum blockchain, and to the change in investors’ expectations (from exuberant to pessimistic); the change in the stance of monetary policy burst the bubbles of BTC and ETH prices in 2024. No test supports the exuberance of XRP that is traded on a centralized ledger; weekly data confirm the absence of multiple bubbles. By looking at the presence of bubbles in these different digital ecosystems, we also consider how the technological differences can impact, possibly asymmetrically, bubbles' formation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article e00420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143877358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper investigates how fiscal regulation may influence lower government finances by devolving greater responsibilities to local policymakers that limit free-riding behaviour and ensure fiscal sustainability. To this extent, the Italian case provides a suitable regulatory setting that has evolved over the years, as almost 600 Italian municipalities experienced financial distress from 1989 to 2018. The aim of this study is two-fold: i) to investigate the historical and geographical evolution of local government bankruptcy procedures and ii) to test whether the exogenous Italian legislation on local government defaults influenced the dynamics of the local financial distress phenomenon, identifying three different fiscal regulatory regimes. Our results show that the regulatory regimes until 2000, which prepared for the government bail-out of local defaults, encouraged municipalities to take advantage of the bankruptcy procedures and after 2001, when the legislative interventions had been updated, there is no longer such incentive. Asymmetric effects are observed when municipalities are analysed by population size, pointing to the need to go beyond a one-size-fits-all approach to fiscal policy.
{"title":"Local financial distress and fiscal regimes: Evidence from Italy","authors":"Cristiana Fiorelli , Nicola Pontarollo , Carolina Serpieri","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00418","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00418","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates how fiscal regulation may influence lower government finances by devolving greater responsibilities to local policymakers that limit free-riding behaviour and ensure fiscal sustainability. To this extent, the Italian case provides a suitable regulatory setting that has evolved over the years, as almost 600 Italian municipalities experienced financial distress from 1989 to 2018. The aim of this study is two-fold: i) to investigate the historical and geographical evolution of local government bankruptcy procedures and ii) to test whether the exogenous Italian legislation on local government defaults influenced the dynamics of the local financial distress phenomenon, identifying three different fiscal regulatory regimes. Our results show that the regulatory regimes until 2000, which prepared for the government bail-out of local defaults, encouraged municipalities to take advantage of the bankruptcy procedures and after 2001, when the legislative interventions had been updated, there is no longer such incentive. Asymmetric effects are observed when municipalities are analysed by population size, pointing to the need to go beyond a one-size-fits-all approach to fiscal policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article e00418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143842462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-15DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00417
Leo M. Doerr
This study explores potential asymmetries in the relationship between development aid and economic growth. Our analysis reveals that while previous research identifies small positive growth effects of aid, these results stem from the adverse impact of aid reductions, with no corresponding positive effect from aid increases. This suggests that aid acts more as a substitute for domestic resources than as a catalyst for growth. Combining dynamic generalized method of moments techniques with asymmetric effect analysis, we provide a new methodological framework that addresses both unbalanced effects and endogeneity of aid, offering new insights into the aid-growth nexus.
{"title":"Aid and growth: Asymmetric effects?","authors":"Leo M. Doerr","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00417","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeca.2025.e00417","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores potential asymmetries in the relationship between development aid and economic growth. Our analysis reveals that while previous research identifies small positive growth effects of aid, these results stem from the adverse impact of aid reductions, with no corresponding positive effect from aid increases. This suggests that aid acts more as a substitute for domestic resources than as a catalyst for growth. Combining dynamic generalized method of moments techniques with asymmetric effect analysis, we provide a new methodological framework that addresses both unbalanced effects and endogeneity of aid, offering new insights into the aid-growth nexus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article e00417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143835236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号