Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)最新文献

Introduction and objectives: The development of specific heart failure (HF) units has improved the management of patients with this disease due to improved organization and resource management. The Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) has defined 3 types of HF units (community, specialized, and advanced) based on their complexity and service portfolio. Our aim was to compare the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with HF according to the type of unit.

Methods: We analyzed data from the SEC-Excelente-IC quality accreditation program registry, with 1716 patients consecutively included in two 1-month cutoffs (March and October) from 2019 to 2021 by 45 SEC-accredited HF units. We compared the characteristics, treatment and 1-year outcomes between the 3 types of units.

Results: Of the 1716 patients, 13.2% were treated in community units, 65.9% in specialized units, and 20.9% in advanced units. The rates of mortality (27.5 vs 15.5/100 patients-year; P<.001), admissions for HF (39.7 vs 29.2/100 patients-year; P=.019), total decompensations (56.1 vs 40.5/100 patients-year; P=.003), and combined death/admission for HF (45.2 vs 31.4/100 patients-year; P=.005) were higher in community units than in specialized/advanced units. Follow-up in a community unit was an independent predictor of higher mortality and admissions at 1 year.

Conclusions: Compared with follow-up by more specialized units, follow-up in a community unit was associated with a higher decompensation rate and increased 1-year mortality.

Introduction and objectives: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is highly prevalent and is recognized as an important clinical entity in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Nevertheless, the association of CMD with adverse cardiovascular events in the spectrum of CHD has not been systemically quantified.

Methods: We searched electronic databases for studies on patients with CHD in whom coronary microvascular function was measured invasively, and clinical events were recorded. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and the secondary endpoint was all-cause death. Estimates of effect were calculated using a random-effects model from published risk ratios.

Results: We included 27 studies with 11 404 patients. Patients with CMD assessed by invasive methods had a higher risk of MACE (RR, 2.18; 95%CI, 1.80-2.64; P<.01) and all-cause death (RR, 1.88; 95%CI, 1.55-2.27; P<.01) than those without CMD. There was no significant difference in the impact of CMD on MACE (interaction P value=.95) among different invasive measurement modalities. The magnitude of risk of CMD assessed by invasive measurements for MACE was greater in acute coronary syndrome patients (RR, 2.84, 95%CI, 2.26-3.57; P<.01) than in chronic coronary syndrome patients (RR, 1.77, 95%CI, 1.44-2.18; P<.01) (interaction P value<.01).

Conclusions: CMD based on invasive measurements was associated with a high incidence of MACE and all-cause death in patients with CHD. The magnitude of risk for cardiovascular events in CMD as assessed by invasive measurements was similar among different methods but varied among CHD populations.

Introduction and objectives: The role of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the risk prediction of patients with systemic right ventricles (sRV) is not well defined. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic value of NT-proBNP in patients with an sRV.

Methods: The prognostic value of NT-proBNP was assessed in 98 patients from the SERVE trial. We used an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, survival analysis, and c-statistics. The composite primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically relevant arrhythmia, heart failure, or death. Correlations between baseline NT-proBNP values and biventricular volumes and function were assessed by adjusted linear regression models.

Results: The median age [interquartile range] at baseline was 39 [32-48] years and 32% were women. The median NT-proBNP was 238 [137-429] ng/L. Baseline NT-proBNP concentrations were significantly higher among the 20 (20%) patients developing the combined primary outcome compared with those who did not (816 [194-1094] vs 205 [122-357]; P=.003). In patients with NT-proBNP concentrations> 75th percentile (> 429 ng/L), we found an exponential increase in the sex- and age-adjusted hazard ratio for the primary outcome. The prognostic value of NT-proBNP was comparable to right ventricular ejection fraction and peak oxygen uptake on exercise testing (c-statistic: 0.71, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively).

Conclusions: In patients with sRVs, NT-proBNP concentrations correlate with sRV volumes and function and may serve as a simple tool for predicting adverse outcomes.

Introduction and objectives: There is limited evidence to identify the most accurate method for measuring the mitral valve area (MVA) after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral repair. Our objective was to evaluate the optimal method in this context and its correlation with the mean transmitral gradient.

Methods: A registry of patients undergoing percutaneous mitral repair was conducted, analyzing different methods of measuring MVA and their correlation with the mean gradient.

Results: We analyzed data from 167 patients. The mean age was 76±10.3 years, 54% were men, and 46% were women. Etiology was degenerative in 45%, functional in 39%, and mixed in 16%. Postclip MVA measurements were 1.89±0.60 cm² using pressure half-time (PHT), 2.87±0.83 cm² using 3D planimetry, and the mean gradient was 3±1.19mmHg. MVA using 3D planimetry showed a stronger correlation with the mean gradient (r=0.46, P<.001) than MVA obtained by PHT (r=0.19, P=.048). Interobserver agreement was also higher with 3D planimetry than with PHT (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90 vs 0.81 and variation coefficient of 9.6 vs 19.7%, respectively).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the PHT method significantly underestimates MVA after clip implantation compared with direct measurement using transesophageal 3D planimetry. The latter method also correlates better with postimplantation gradients and has less interobserver variability. These results suggest that 3D planimetry is a more appropriate method for assessing postclip mitral stenosis.

Introduction and objectives: The association of revascularization strategy with clinical outcomes according to the ischemic territory of nonculprit lesion has not been documented in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study aimed to compare outcomes between culprit-only and immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to ischemic territory in patients with AMI-CS.

Methods: A total of 536 patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease from the SMART-RESCUE registry were categorized according to ischemic territory (nonculprit left main/proximal left anterior descending artery [LM/pLAD] vs culprit LM/pLAD vs no LM/pLAD). The primary outcome was a patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) consisting of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, rehospitalization due to heart failure, or repeat revascularization at 1 year.

Results: Among the total population, 108 patients had nonculprit LM/pLAD, 228 patients had culprit LM/pLAD, and 200 patients had no LM/pLAD, with the risk of POCE being higher in patients with large ischemic territory lesions (53.6% vs 53.4% vs 39.6%; P = .02). Multivessel PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of POCE compared with culprit-only PCI in patients with nonculprit LM/pLAD (40.7% vs 66.9%; HR, 0.52; 95%CI, 0.29-0.91; P=.02), but not in those with culprit LM/pLAD (P=.46) or no LM/pLAD (P=.47). A significant interaction existed between revascularization strategy and large nonculprit ischemic territory (P=.03).

Conclusions: Large ischemic territory involvement was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease. Immediate multivessel PCI might improve clinical outcomes in patients with a large nonculprit ischemic burden.