second part of this chapter focuses on adaptations, or “appropriations” as Deats calls them, of the Faust legend, including titles like The Devil and Daniel Webster, Alias Nick Beal, Damn Yankees, Bedazzled and its subsequent sequel, Oh, God! You Devil, Crossroads, and Angel Heart. Her epilogue to the book mentions the media coverage of the 2016 presidential election in the US, which featured many allusions to the Faust legend, and speaks briefly about the durability of this text. The Faust Legend: From Marlowe and Goethe to Contemporary Drama and Film would serve any BAor MA-level course focused on the Faust Legend as an overview text to accompany an in-depth look at either Marlowe’s or Goethe’s text. Both its chronological focus and its inclusion of post-Goethe materials make this text accessible to students at these levels and it offers a thorough enough overview for an introductory course.
{"title":"The Oxford Handbook of Faust in Music ed. by Lorna Fitzsimmons and Charles McKnight (review)","authors":"Peter Höyng","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0034","url":null,"abstract":"second part of this chapter focuses on adaptations, or “appropriations” as Deats calls them, of the Faust legend, including titles like The Devil and Daniel Webster, Alias Nick Beal, Damn Yankees, Bedazzled and its subsequent sequel, Oh, God! You Devil, Crossroads, and Angel Heart. Her epilogue to the book mentions the media coverage of the 2016 presidential election in the US, which featured many allusions to the Faust legend, and speaks briefly about the durability of this text. The Faust Legend: From Marlowe and Goethe to Contemporary Drama and Film would serve any BAor MA-level course focused on the Faust Legend as an overview text to accompany an in-depth look at either Marlowe’s or Goethe’s text. Both its chronological focus and its inclusion of post-Goethe materials make this text accessible to students at these levels and it offers a thorough enough overview for an introductory course.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133652737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mytho-Poetics at Work: A Study of the Figure of Egmont, the Dutch Revolt and its Influence in Europe by Rengenier C. Rittersma (review)","authors":"S. Richter","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0037","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114517450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Adele Schopenhauer. Unbekanntes aus ihrem Nachlass in Weimar by Claudia Häfner and Francesca Fabbri (review)","authors":"Waltraud Maierhofer","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0036","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130545951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Klassik als Kulturelle Praxis. Funktional, Intermedial, Transkulturell ed. by Paula Wojcik et al. (review)","authors":"Marissa Schoedel","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0040","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116129895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
work and world. It is perhaps worth noting that this argument is directed against a notion of autonomy as the strict separation of art from actuality, of ideal from reality. At least to this reviewer, however, it is questionable whether that definition—as opposed, for example, to self-legislation—adequately captures what aesthetic autonomy means. Local differences aside, I find the general tendency of Pirholt’s analysis richly suggestive. His strategy is to excavate the experiential and material conditions that make specific modes of artistic achievement possible. This intention governs the fourth and fifth chapters as well. The fourth chapter introduces the concept of “semitechnical reproducibility” in order to characterize the means through which artworks were made accessible to Goethe and his contemporaries. From his early inspiring visit to Mannheim on, Goethe’s experience of art would have been impossible without reproductive techniques: drawn copies, engravings, lithographs, plaster casts, and so forth. Dresden and Italy were the (staggeringly important) autoptic exceptions, of course, but the grand enterprise of Kunst und Altertum is unthinkable apart from a flourishing industry of imagistic reproduction and publication. Pirholt brings out the significance of this medial configuration with admirable breadth and clarity, documenting inter alia Goethe’s highly developed and, to a degree, theoretically reflected “medientechnologisches Bewusstsein.” In the fifth chapter, Pirholt investigates one of the foundational conceptual structures of the age, the distinction between “ancient” and “modern” art. Approaches to this distinction on the conceptual level are, of course, well-known, but Pirholt’s exploration of the issue—in line with the entire orientation of his study—turns to concrete cases, the prize competitions Goethe and Meier organized and the essay “Polygnots Gemälde,” products from the cusp of the nineteenth century. Two distinct projects, one an effort to fix a set of classicist expectations as a norm for contemporary artistic production, the other the attempted “reconstruction” of lost or destroyed products of ancient works. It is in this chapter that Pirholt develops his own account of one of the central topics of research on Goethe’s thought generally: his concept of Anschauung. Perhaps it is not an altogether inaccurate characterization of these highly compelling pages to say that the goal is to disclose what might be termed the anthropology of Anschauung as it is developed in Goethe’s work. The center of that anthropological interpretation, as brought out in Pirholt’s compelling account, is the “unwiderstehliche Begierde nach unmittelbarem Anschauen.” Professor Pirholt is known to readers of the Goethe Yearbook and to Englishlanguage scholarship on Goethe and his age. (See his Metamimesis: Imitation in Goethe’s “Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre” and Early German Romanticism, 2012). His Grenzerfahrungen, the riches of which I could only
工作和世界。也许值得注意的是，这一论点是针对自主性的概念，即艺术与现实、理想与现实的严格分离。然而，至少对这个评论家来说，这个定义——例如，与自我立法相反——是否充分抓住了美学自治的含义是值得怀疑的。撇开地方差异不谈，我发现皮尔霍尔特分析的总体趋势极具启发性。他的策略是挖掘使特定艺术成就模式成为可能的经验和物质条件。这个意图也支配着第四章和第五章。第四章介绍了“半技术再现性”的概念，以表征歌德和他的同时代人可以获得艺术品的手段。从他早期鼓舞人心的曼海姆之行开始，歌德的艺术经历如果没有复制技术是不可能的:绘画复制品、雕刻、石版、石膏模型等等。当然，德累斯顿和意大利是(极其重要的)自动复制的例外，但如果没有蓬勃发展的图像复制和出版行业，“艺术与替代”的宏伟事业是不可想象的。Pirholt以令人钦佩的广度和清晰度揭示了这种媒介结构的重要性，记录了歌德高度发展的，在一定程度上理论上反映的“媒介技术Bewusstsein”。在第五章中，皮尔霍尔特研究了这个时代的一个基本概念结构，即“古代”和“现代”艺术之间的区别。当然，在概念层面上研究这种区别的方法是众所周知的，但皮尔霍尔特对这个问题的探索——与他研究的整个方向一致——转向了具体的案例，歌德和迈耶组织的有奖竞赛和论文“Polygnots Gemälde”，这是19世纪初的产物。两个截然不同的项目，一个是努力将一套古典主义的期望作为当代艺术生产的规范，另一个是试图“重建”丢失或毁坏的古代作品。正是在这一章中，皮尔霍特发展了他自己对歌德思想研究的中心主题之一的描述:他的安绍昂概念。也许这不是一个完全不准确的描述，这些非常引人注目的页面说，目标是揭示可能被称为Anschauung的人类学，因为它是在歌德的作品中发展起来的。这种人类学解释的中心，正如皮尔霍尔特令人信服的叙述所提出的那样，是“unwiderstehliche Begierde nach unmittelbarem Anschauen”。皮尔霍尔特教授在《歌德年鉴》的读者和关于歌德及其时代的英语学者中都很有名。(参见他的《Metamimesis: Imitation》，见歌德的《Wilhelm meister Lehrjahre》和《早期德国浪漫主义》，2012)。他的《Grenzerfahrungen》的丰富内容，我只能在这篇评论中加以概括，值得北美读者积极回应。
{"title":"Anonymität—Onymität. Autorname und Autorschaft in Wilhelm Meisters \"doppelten Wanderjahren.\" by Nora Ramtke (review)","authors":"Matthew H. Birkhold","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0028","url":null,"abstract":"work and world. It is perhaps worth noting that this argument is directed against a notion of autonomy as the strict separation of art from actuality, of ideal from reality. At least to this reviewer, however, it is questionable whether that definition—as opposed, for example, to self-legislation—adequately captures what aesthetic autonomy means. Local differences aside, I find the general tendency of Pirholt’s analysis richly suggestive. His strategy is to excavate the experiential and material conditions that make specific modes of artistic achievement possible. This intention governs the fourth and fifth chapters as well. The fourth chapter introduces the concept of “semitechnical reproducibility” in order to characterize the means through which artworks were made accessible to Goethe and his contemporaries. From his early inspiring visit to Mannheim on, Goethe’s experience of art would have been impossible without reproductive techniques: drawn copies, engravings, lithographs, plaster casts, and so forth. Dresden and Italy were the (staggeringly important) autoptic exceptions, of course, but the grand enterprise of Kunst und Altertum is unthinkable apart from a flourishing industry of imagistic reproduction and publication. Pirholt brings out the significance of this medial configuration with admirable breadth and clarity, documenting inter alia Goethe’s highly developed and, to a degree, theoretically reflected “medientechnologisches Bewusstsein.” In the fifth chapter, Pirholt investigates one of the foundational conceptual structures of the age, the distinction between “ancient” and “modern” art. Approaches to this distinction on the conceptual level are, of course, well-known, but Pirholt’s exploration of the issue—in line with the entire orientation of his study—turns to concrete cases, the prize competitions Goethe and Meier organized and the essay “Polygnots Gemälde,” products from the cusp of the nineteenth century. Two distinct projects, one an effort to fix a set of classicist expectations as a norm for contemporary artistic production, the other the attempted “reconstruction” of lost or destroyed products of ancient works. It is in this chapter that Pirholt develops his own account of one of the central topics of research on Goethe’s thought generally: his concept of Anschauung. Perhaps it is not an altogether inaccurate characterization of these highly compelling pages to say that the goal is to disclose what might be termed the anthropology of Anschauung as it is developed in Goethe’s work. The center of that anthropological interpretation, as brought out in Pirholt’s compelling account, is the “unwiderstehliche Begierde nach unmittelbarem Anschauen.” Professor Pirholt is known to readers of the Goethe Yearbook and to Englishlanguage scholarship on Goethe and his age. (See his Metamimesis: Imitation in Goethe’s “Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre” and Early German Romanticism, 2012). His Grenzerfahrungen, the riches of which I could only ","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116965923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:This article examines how Goethe places his reading about a Jesuit disputation with a Buddhist monk in seventeenth-century China within the context of German philosophical debates. Goethe immediately draws an analogy connecting Weimar debates between Kantians and idealists to the earlier Nanjing debate about Jesuit and Buddhism metaphysics. His inclination to perceive parallels between philosophy in China and Germany anticipates his later comments to Eckermann about the similarities between the Chinese and European novels that served as the basis for his pronouncements about Weltliteratur (world literature). A careful reading of Goethe and Schiller's letters shows that as a heretical thinker, Goethe was inclined to identify with the Buddhist dismissal of Christian theism; however, the emerging atheism controversy surrounding accusations made against Fichte's lectures at the University of Jena led him to cautiously avoid entering into yet another Enlightenment debate about religion.
{"title":"Between Nanjing and Weimar: Goethe's Metaphysical Correspondences","authors":"D. Purdy","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines how Goethe places his reading about a Jesuit disputation with a Buddhist monk in seventeenth-century China within the context of German philosophical debates. Goethe immediately draws an analogy connecting Weimar debates between Kantians and idealists to the earlier Nanjing debate about Jesuit and Buddhism metaphysics. His inclination to perceive parallels between philosophy in China and Germany anticipates his later comments to Eckermann about the similarities between the Chinese and European novels that served as the basis for his pronouncements about Weltliteratur (world literature). A careful reading of Goethe and Schiller's letters shows that as a heretical thinker, Goethe was inclined to identify with the Buddhist dismissal of Christian theism; however, the emerging atheism controversy surrounding accusations made against Fichte's lectures at the University of Jena led him to cautiously avoid entering into yet another Enlightenment debate about religion.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121057106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Sweet Science: Romantic Materialism and the New Logics of Life by Amanda Jo Goldstein (review)","authors":"Bryan Norton","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124343942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:In diesem Artikel werden neue medienwissenschaftliche Ansätze von Gisbert Ter-Nedden und Robert Vellusig vorgestellt, die den medientechnologischen Wandel im 18. Jahrhundert ergründen und dessen Wirkung bis in die Gegenwart verfolgen. Ausgehend von der Briefkultur und dem Briefroman des 18. Jahrhunderts zeigt dieser Ansatz, wie in der Literatur eine neue Erlebniskultur geschaffen wird, die den Menschen zum "Augenund Ohrenzeugen" des Geschehens macht und Emotionen weckt, wobei diese Rezeptionsweise vergleichbar mit derjenigen von Filmen und den neuen sozialen Medien sei. Durch Elemente der Mündlichkeit wird eine Unmittelbarkeit des Daseins geschaffen, die Einblick in das Bewusstsein anderer Menschen ermöglicht und eine neue Dimension des Erlebens erreicht. In einem zweiten Schritt wird dieser theoretische Ansatz auf Bestseller wie Rouseaus Julie, ou La Nouvelle Héloїse oder Henry Fieldings The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling angewandt und gezeigt, dass deren Anziehungskraft gerade in den Merkmalen der Mündlichkeit liegt, die diese Unmittelbarkeit des Erlebens erzielen. Durch Elemente wie kurze Briefe, monologähnliche Reflektionen oder Dialoge wird eine Dramatisierung des Romans erreicht, die, wie anschlieβend ausgeführt wird, den umgekehrten Schritt, nämlich die Adaption dieser Romane für das Drama erlaubt, den Franz von Heufeld in einigen seiner Komödien für die Wiener Bühne erfolgreich vollzogen hat.
抽象:在本文中，本文介绍了Gisbert ter nedden和Robert Vellusig等的新媒体科学方法，并将运用媒体技术转移到18世纪。远不止于此我是根据18世纪的信件文化和笔友判断的。但在本世纪初，这一方式揭示了文学是怎样发展出一个新的体验文化，使人成为历史的“听觉证人”，使人们的感受可以和电影和新社交媒体相媲美。充分认识的要素创造出立竿见影的生活，促进对他人意识的了解，并为人们的生活增添一个新层面。第二步,这一理论方法在畅销书Rouseaus朱莉,你La Nouvelle Hé洛ї上或亨利佛的历史》汤姆·琼斯a Foundling表明,他们的吸引力正将采用特征Mündlichkeit位于这些立竿见影的经验取得.元素,例如简短而信monologähnliche Reflektionen或对话将是一个小说的设定完成,像anschlieβ结局上演,价值的一步,即让戏剧的改编这个小说的弗兰茨Heufeld在一些他的喜剧对维也纳舞台成功地进行了.
{"title":"Bestseller und Erlebniskultur: Neue medienästhetische Ansätze bei Gisbert Ter-Nedden und Robert Vellusig verdeutlicht an Romanadaptionen von Franz von Heufeld","authors":"Monika Nenon","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In diesem Artikel werden neue medienwissenschaftliche Ansätze von Gisbert Ter-Nedden und Robert Vellusig vorgestellt, die den medientechnologischen Wandel im 18. Jahrhundert ergründen und dessen Wirkung bis in die Gegenwart verfolgen. Ausgehend von der Briefkultur und dem Briefroman des 18. Jahrhunderts zeigt dieser Ansatz, wie in der Literatur eine neue Erlebniskultur geschaffen wird, die den Menschen zum \"Augenund Ohrenzeugen\" des Geschehens macht und Emotionen weckt, wobei diese Rezeptionsweise vergleichbar mit derjenigen von Filmen und den neuen sozialen Medien sei. Durch Elemente der Mündlichkeit wird eine Unmittelbarkeit des Daseins geschaffen, die Einblick in das Bewusstsein anderer Menschen ermöglicht und eine neue Dimension des Erlebens erreicht. In einem zweiten Schritt wird dieser theoretische Ansatz auf Bestseller wie Rouseaus Julie, ou La Nouvelle Héloїse oder Henry Fieldings The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling angewandt und gezeigt, dass deren Anziehungskraft gerade in den Merkmalen der Mündlichkeit liegt, die diese Unmittelbarkeit des Erlebens erzielen. Durch Elemente wie kurze Briefe, monologähnliche Reflektionen oder Dialoge wird eine Dramatisierung des Romans erreicht, die, wie anschlieβend ausgeführt wird, den umgekehrten Schritt, nämlich die Adaption dieser Romane für das Drama erlaubt, den Franz von Heufeld in einigen seiner Komödien für die Wiener Bühne erfolgreich vollzogen hat.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132528881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:This essay examines commemorations of the 1949 Goethe Year in postwar Peronist Argentina. Its purview includes numerous musical performances, theatrical presentations, academic lectures, and written scholarship. Most activities occurred in the capital city of Buenos Aires; however, this investigation also makes excursions beyond the epicenter to Mendoza, La Plata, and Rosario, as well as neighboring Uruguay, Chile, and Brazil. There was no German author so broadly recognized and esteemed as Goethe, so the plethora of tributes to him represent an opportunity to analyze the resonance of a German figure among the full diversity of Argentina's educated population, including Argentines of all political persuasions, European nationals and immigrants, and large, conflictive German-speaking blocs of antifascist, Jews, nationalists, and recently arrived Nazis. The sweeping range of homages permits an analysis of Goethe's reception among all these groups while providing insights into their perspectives on Peronism, Nazism, post-war European politics, and, especially, Argentine literary history. Argentina and Goethe are twin lenses for exploring the role of art as an instrument and an inspiration in the cultural contact zones that existed among immigrant groups, their hosts, and nations of origin.
{"title":"Instrument or Inspiration? Commemorating the 1949 Goethe Year in Argentina","authors":"Robert Kelz","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay examines commemorations of the 1949 Goethe Year in postwar Peronist Argentina. Its purview includes numerous musical performances, theatrical presentations, academic lectures, and written scholarship. Most activities occurred in the capital city of Buenos Aires; however, this investigation also makes excursions beyond the epicenter to Mendoza, La Plata, and Rosario, as well as neighboring Uruguay, Chile, and Brazil. There was no German author so broadly recognized and esteemed as Goethe, so the plethora of tributes to him represent an opportunity to analyze the resonance of a German figure among the full diversity of Argentina's educated population, including Argentines of all political persuasions, European nationals and immigrants, and large, conflictive German-speaking blocs of antifascist, Jews, nationalists, and recently arrived Nazis. The sweeping range of homages permits an analysis of Goethe's reception among all these groups while providing insights into their perspectives on Peronism, Nazism, post-war European politics, and, especially, Argentine literary history. Argentina and Goethe are twin lenses for exploring the role of art as an instrument and an inspiration in the cultural contact zones that existed among immigrant groups, their hosts, and nations of origin.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121212200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante, and Goethe by George Santayana (review)","authors":"Daniel DiMassa","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2021.0029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2021.0029","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123204170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：