Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.4067/S0718-33992021000100408
J. L. González
{"title":"Hechos punibles en el ámbito de las prácticas deportivas. A su vez, un ejemplo de la relevancia del resultado lesivo para la configuración del injusto penal","authors":"J. L. González","doi":"10.4067/S0718-33992021000100408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992021000100408","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47488506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.4067/S0718-33992021000100115
Ester Blay Gil, Daniel Varona Gómez
espanolEl debate acerca del populismo punitivo se ha centrado en Espana en la evolucion legislativa y las modificaciones que en los ultimos 25 anos han ido endureciendo las respuestas penales a la delincuencia. Adicionalmente, se ha prestado atencion al crecimiento de la poblacion penitenciaria como senal de abuso del sistema penal. Estas lineas de investigacion, sin embargo, resultan incompletas si lo que se pretende es conocer la realidad penologica en nuestro pais, pues los datos oficiales no tienen en cuenta las posibilidades existentes de suspension y sustitucion de las penas de prision. Este articulo busca acercarse a dicha realidad penologica presentando los resultados descriptivos de una investigacion centrada en la aplicacion judicial de las penas. A diferencia de lo que sucede con las estadisticas oficiales, al tener en cuenta la decision judicial relativa a la suspension y sustitucion de la pena de prision, se presenta aqui una cartografia mas completa de las penas efectivamente ejecutadas. En ultima instancia, los resultados de esta investigacion revelan un amplio recurso a las alternativas a prision, en un contexto de crecimiento global del sistema penal. EnglishThe debates around popular punitivism in Spain have focused on the Penal Code’s legal reforms over the last 25 years, which have harshened penal responses to crime. Additionally, scholars have resorted to the rise of prison population and prison rates as a sign of overuse of the criminal justice system. However, these studies are not enough to reveal a complete picture of the sentencing alternatives used by judges, which includes suspended and substituted prison sentences that do not appear in official statistics. This paper contributes to this debate by presenting the descriptive results of a study on the judicial application of the sentencing alternatives. Contrary to the collection of official statistics, this paper considers the discretionary decision to suspend and substitute prison sentences, presenting a more complete picture of sentencing in Spain. The results of this research show judges resort considerably to alternatives to prison, in a context of overall growth of the criminal justice system.
{"title":"El castigo en la España del siglo XXI. Cartografiando el iceberg de la penalidad","authors":"Ester Blay Gil, Daniel Varona Gómez","doi":"10.4067/S0718-33992021000100115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992021000100115","url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl debate acerca del populismo punitivo se ha centrado en Espana en la evolucion legislativa y las modificaciones que en los ultimos 25 anos han ido endureciendo las respuestas penales a la delincuencia. Adicionalmente, se ha prestado atencion al crecimiento de la poblacion penitenciaria como senal de abuso del sistema penal. Estas lineas de investigacion, sin embargo, resultan incompletas si lo que se pretende es conocer la realidad penologica en nuestro pais, pues los datos oficiales no tienen en cuenta las posibilidades existentes de suspension y sustitucion de las penas de prision. Este articulo busca acercarse a dicha realidad penologica presentando los resultados descriptivos de una investigacion centrada en la aplicacion judicial de las penas. A diferencia de lo que sucede con las estadisticas oficiales, al tener en cuenta la decision judicial relativa a la suspension y sustitucion de la pena de prision, se presenta aqui una cartografia mas completa de las penas efectivamente ejecutadas. En ultima instancia, los resultados de esta investigacion revelan un amplio recurso a las alternativas a prision, en un contexto de crecimiento global del sistema penal. EnglishThe debates around popular punitivism in Spain have focused on the Penal Code’s legal reforms over the last 25 years, which have harshened penal responses to crime. Additionally, scholars have resorted to the rise of prison population and prison rates as a sign of overuse of the criminal justice system. However, these studies are not enough to reveal a complete picture of the sentencing alternatives used by judges, which includes suspended and substituted prison sentences that do not appear in official statistics. This paper contributes to this debate by presenting the descriptive results of a study on the judicial application of the sentencing alternatives. Contrary to the collection of official statistics, this paper considers the discretionary decision to suspend and substitute prison sentences, presenting a more complete picture of sentencing in Spain. The results of this research show judges resort considerably to alternatives to prison, in a context of overall growth of the criminal justice system.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43389481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.4067/S0718-33992021000100381
F. Lara
espanolLos avances cientificos auguran la posibilidad de mejorar capacidades de relevancia moral por medio de tratamientos neurologicos. Los objetivos de este articulo seran dos. Primero, el de determinar hasta que punto estas nuevas tecnologias podrian modificar ciertas disfunciones neurales de los psicopatas, que son las responsables de su tendencia a la criminalidad. Se consideraran, en particular, como la farmacologia y las tecnicas de estimulacion transcraneal pueden paliar la falta de prudencia, el exceso de agresividad y la ausencia de empatia. El segundo objetivo sera el de evaluar eticamente el uso de tales tecnologias biomedicas para la rehabilitacion de estos individuos. Para ello, se derivaran dos requisitos a partir de un criterio de “tratamiento abierto” y se comprobara si los cumplen las expuestas biomejoras de personas psicopaticas. Se concluira que solo en ciertos casos tales requisitos se cumpliran y que, cuando asi sea, sera justo conceder a estas personas los mecanismos biologicos que a los demas nos permiten ser basicamente autonomos. EnglishScientific progress leads to expect the possibility of enhancing moral abilities through neurological treatments. This article explores the extent to which such progress could be applied in the rehabilitation of psychopathic offenders. The goal is to answer the question of whether that biotechnological application is ethical.
{"title":"Biomejora moral de delincuentes psicópatas. Tecnologías y aspectos éticos","authors":"F. Lara","doi":"10.4067/S0718-33992021000100381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992021000100381","url":null,"abstract":"espanolLos avances cientificos auguran la posibilidad de mejorar capacidades de relevancia moral por medio de tratamientos neurologicos. Los objetivos de este articulo seran dos. Primero, el de determinar hasta que punto estas nuevas tecnologias podrian modificar ciertas disfunciones neurales de los psicopatas, que son las responsables de su tendencia a la criminalidad. Se consideraran, en particular, como la farmacologia y las tecnicas de estimulacion transcraneal pueden paliar la falta de prudencia, el exceso de agresividad y la ausencia de empatia. El segundo objetivo sera el de evaluar eticamente el uso de tales tecnologias biomedicas para la rehabilitacion de estos individuos. Para ello, se derivaran dos requisitos a partir de un criterio de “tratamiento abierto” y se comprobara si los cumplen las expuestas biomejoras de personas psicopaticas. Se concluira que solo en ciertos casos tales requisitos se cumpliran y que, cuando asi sea, sera justo conceder a estas personas los mecanismos biologicos que a los demas nos permiten ser basicamente autonomos. EnglishScientific progress leads to expect the possibility of enhancing moral abilities through neurological treatments. This article explores the extent to which such progress could be applied in the rehabilitation of psychopathic offenders. The goal is to answer the question of whether that biotechnological application is ethical.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42709788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.4067/S0718-33992021000100164
Lautaro Contreras Chaimovich
espanolEl presente trabajo busca dar respuesta a la pregunta de si la regulacion de los delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones, contemplada en el Codigo Penal chileno, satisface el mandato constitucional de determinacion, previsto en el inc. final del art. 19 no3 de la Constitucion Politica chilena. Para ello, se analiza la finalidad del mandato de determinacion y las exigencias que impone al legislador penal. Seguidamente, se exponen y revisan criticamente los argumentos de los autores del Derecho aleman que han planteado la inconstitucionalidad de los delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones. Finalmente, se examina la compatibilidad de los tipos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones, previstos en el Codigo Penal chileno, con el mandato constitucional de determinacion. EnglishThe article addresses the question of whether the regulation of the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries, contemplated in the Chilean Criminal Code, satisfies the constitutional principle of legality in criminal law, established in the final subparagraph of article 19 n°3 of the Political Constitution. This article analyses the purpose of the principle of legality, as well as the requirements that it imposes over the legislator of criminal law. Then, it exposes and critically review the arguments of scholars who, in the context of German law, have proposed the unconstitutionality of the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries. Finally, this article examines the compatibility between the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries, established in the Chilean Criminal Code, and the constitutional principle of legality in criminal law.
{"title":"Mandato constitucional de determinación y delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones","authors":"Lautaro Contreras Chaimovich","doi":"10.4067/S0718-33992021000100164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992021000100164","url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl presente trabajo busca dar respuesta a la pregunta de si la regulacion de los delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones, contemplada en el Codigo Penal chileno, satisface el mandato constitucional de determinacion, previsto en el inc. final del art. 19 no3 de la Constitucion Politica chilena. Para ello, se analiza la finalidad del mandato de determinacion y las exigencias que impone al legislador penal. Seguidamente, se exponen y revisan criticamente los argumentos de los autores del Derecho aleman que han planteado la inconstitucionalidad de los delitos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones. Finalmente, se examina la compatibilidad de los tipos imprudentes de homicidio y lesiones, previstos en el Codigo Penal chileno, con el mandato constitucional de determinacion. EnglishThe article addresses the question of whether the regulation of the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries, contemplated in the Chilean Criminal Code, satisfies the constitutional principle of legality in criminal law, established in the final subparagraph of article 19 n°3 of the Political Constitution. This article analyses the purpose of the principle of legality, as well as the requirements that it imposes over the legislator of criminal law. Then, it exposes and critically review the arguments of scholars who, in the context of German law, have proposed the unconstitutionality of the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries. Finally, this article examines the compatibility between the crimes of negligent homicide and injuries, established in the Chilean Criminal Code, and the constitutional principle of legality in criminal law.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42044812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.4067/S0718-33992020000201009
Gílmer Alarcón Requejo
espanolEl presente articulo evalua la aplicacion del interes publico en el razonamiento del legislador peruano para la despenalizacion de los delitos contra el honor. Se tomaron en cuenta elementos dogmaticos de caracter constitucional y penal sobre las disposiciones normativas que protegen el honor frente al ejercicio ilegitimo de la libertad de expresion. Este marco permitio analizar el contenido conceptual del interes publico en relacion con la libertad de expresion. Este es uno de los criterios mas destacados para la despenalizacion de conductas que lesionan el honor, donde la difusion de informacion y opinion son de especial relevancia para el despliegue del proceso democratico y los derechos fundamentales en un Estado constitucional. En una primera etapa, los proyectos de ley evaluados denotan una adhesion debil al rol del interes publico para fortalecer las premisas deliberativas del proceso democratico. Tampoco discutieron adecuadamente el contenido protegido del derecho al honor y su proteccion a traves de vias alternativas. Estas limitaciones mejoraron en la etapa mas reciente del debate, lo cual denota un mayor interes argumentativo en la aplicacion del interes publico como criterio normativo para fundamentar la despenalizacion en concordancia con los deberes de motivacion de un legislador racional. EnglishThis article analyses the application of the public interest in the reasoning of the Peruvian legislator for the decriminalization of crimes against honour. Dogmatic elements of a constitutional and criminal nature were taken into account on the normative provisions that protect honour against the illegitimate exercise of freedom of expression. This framework made it possible to analyse the conceptual content of the public interest in relation to freedom of expression. This is one of the most prominent criteria for the decriminalization of conduct that damages honour, where the dissemination of information and opinion are of special relevance for the deployment of the democratic process and fundamental rights in a constitutional State. In a first stage, the bills evaluated show a weak adherence to the role of the public interest to strengthen the deliberative premises of the democratic process. Nor did they adequately discuss the protected content of the right to honour and its protection through alternative means. These limitations improved in the most recent stage of the debate, which denotes a greater argumentative interest in the application of the public interest as a normative criterion to base decriminalization in accordance with the motivational duties of a rational legislator.
{"title":"Interés público y despenalización de los delitos contra el honor cometidos a través de la prensa. Una evaluación de la experiencia peruana","authors":"Gílmer Alarcón Requejo","doi":"10.4067/S0718-33992020000201009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992020000201009","url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl presente articulo evalua la aplicacion del interes publico en el razonamiento del legislador peruano para la despenalizacion de los delitos contra el honor. Se tomaron en cuenta elementos dogmaticos de caracter constitucional y penal sobre las disposiciones normativas que protegen el honor frente al ejercicio ilegitimo de la libertad de expresion. Este marco permitio analizar el contenido conceptual del interes publico en relacion con la libertad de expresion. Este es uno de los criterios mas destacados para la despenalizacion de conductas que lesionan el honor, donde la difusion de informacion y opinion son de especial relevancia para el despliegue del proceso democratico y los derechos fundamentales en un Estado constitucional. En una primera etapa, los proyectos de ley evaluados denotan una adhesion debil al rol del interes publico para fortalecer las premisas deliberativas del proceso democratico. Tampoco discutieron adecuadamente el contenido protegido del derecho al honor y su proteccion a traves de vias alternativas. Estas limitaciones mejoraron en la etapa mas reciente del debate, lo cual denota un mayor interes argumentativo en la aplicacion del interes publico como criterio normativo para fundamentar la despenalizacion en concordancia con los deberes de motivacion de un legislador racional. EnglishThis article analyses the application of the public interest in the reasoning of the Peruvian legislator for the decriminalization of crimes against honour. Dogmatic elements of a constitutional and criminal nature were taken into account on the normative provisions that protect honour against the illegitimate exercise of freedom of expression. This framework made it possible to analyse the conceptual content of the public interest in relation to freedom of expression. This is one of the most prominent criteria for the decriminalization of conduct that damages honour, where the dissemination of information and opinion are of special relevance for the deployment of the democratic process and fundamental rights in a constitutional State. In a first stage, the bills evaluated show a weak adherence to the role of the public interest to strengthen the deliberative premises of the democratic process. Nor did they adequately discuss the protected content of the right to honour and its protection through alternative means. These limitations improved in the most recent stage of the debate, which denotes a greater argumentative interest in the application of the public interest as a normative criterion to base decriminalization in accordance with the motivational duties of a rational legislator.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45609966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01DOI: 10.4067/s0718-33992020000100111
Tatiana Vargas Pinto, A. Perin
espanolEl trabajo ofrece una reflexion en torno al elemento subjetivo de la imprudencia y la delimitacion entre esta y el dolo. Se cuestionan las doctrinas que, en ambos planos, niegan la relevancia de consideraciones subjetivas y adoptan concepciones normativas motivadas por el rechazo a las posturas “psicologizantes”. Los autores argumentan el caracter doloso de aquellos supuestos que suponen conocer o asumir el hecho tipico como consecuencia practicamente segura de la conducta (dolo directo) o, al menos, con una alta probabilidad, de modo que suponga prever un peligro concreto (dolo eventual). En cambio, las conductas imprudentes se refieren a una peligrosidad (ex ante) de menor entidad y a riesgos menos irrazonables: el agente solo alcanza a considerar un peligro general, representandose un riesgo abstracto de realizacion del hecho tipico. No obstante, puede haber imprudencia penalmente relevante, aun sin representacion actual del hecho tipico, cuando se adopte un comportamiento cuya peligrosidad no puede desconocerse, justificandose de este modo la imputacion de un “deber de prevision”. EnglishThis paper deals with the subjective element of criminal negligence and the conceptual distinction between negligence, or recklessness, and intention, as different mens rea states. The authors criticize the legal theories that deny the relevance of subjective considerations while adopting normative conceptions motivated by psychologizing objections. They argue that intention requires assuming the realization of the typical event as a practically certain consequence (direct intent) or, at least, with a high probability, so that it implies foresee a specific danger (eventual intent). On the other hand, negligent harmful conducts are dangers of lesser importance (ex-ante), or less unreasonable risks: the agent is conscious of a general danger, being able to foresee an abstract risk of realization of the typical harmful event. However, there may be criminally relevant negligence, even without actual foresight, when adopting a behavior whose danger cannot be ignored, thus justifying the imputation of a “duty of foresight”.
{"title":"La “vidente” imputación imprudente. Peligrosidad de la conducta y consciencia del riesgo en la definición del dolo y la imprudencia","authors":"Tatiana Vargas Pinto, A. Perin","doi":"10.4067/s0718-33992020000100111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992020000100111","url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl trabajo ofrece una reflexion en torno al elemento subjetivo de la imprudencia y la delimitacion entre esta y el dolo. Se cuestionan las doctrinas que, en ambos planos, niegan la relevancia de consideraciones subjetivas y adoptan concepciones normativas motivadas por el rechazo a las posturas “psicologizantes”. Los autores argumentan el caracter doloso de aquellos supuestos que suponen conocer o asumir el hecho tipico como consecuencia practicamente segura de la conducta (dolo directo) o, al menos, con una alta probabilidad, de modo que suponga prever un peligro concreto (dolo eventual). En cambio, las conductas imprudentes se refieren a una peligrosidad (ex ante) de menor entidad y a riesgos menos irrazonables: el agente solo alcanza a considerar un peligro general, representandose un riesgo abstracto de realizacion del hecho tipico. No obstante, puede haber imprudencia penalmente relevante, aun sin representacion actual del hecho tipico, cuando se adopte un comportamiento cuya peligrosidad no puede desconocerse, justificandose de este modo la imputacion de un “deber de prevision”. EnglishThis paper deals with the subjective element of criminal negligence and the conceptual distinction between negligence, or recklessness, and intention, as different mens rea states. The authors criticize the legal theories that deny the relevance of subjective considerations while adopting normative conceptions motivated by psychologizing objections. They argue that intention requires assuming the realization of the typical event as a practically certain consequence (direct intent) or, at least, with a high probability, so that it implies foresee a specific danger (eventual intent). On the other hand, negligent harmful conducts are dangers of lesser importance (ex-ante), or less unreasonable risks: the agent is conscious of a general danger, being able to foresee an abstract risk of realization of the typical harmful event. However, there may be criminally relevant negligence, even without actual foresight, when adopting a behavior whose danger cannot be ignored, thus justifying the imputation of a “duty of foresight”.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46480161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"El tratamiento de la población LGTBIQ en el artículo 7 (1)(h) del Estatuto de la Corte Penal Internacional a la luz de la definición de “género” y del estándar “otros motivos universalmente reconocidos como inaceptables con arreglo al derecho internacional”","authors":"Héctor Olasolo, Nicolás Eduardo Buitrago-Rey, Vanessa Bonilla-Tovar","doi":"10.4067/s0718-33992020000100362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992020000100362","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49429219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01DOI: 10.4067/s0718-33992020000100202
Javier Cigüela Sola
espanolEl objetivo del presente trabajo es analizar el rendimiento que las teorias del reconocimiento ofrecen a la hora de conceptualizar algunos de los problemas fundamentales de la filosofia del Derecho Penal, particularmente: el concepto de delito y el concepto de castigo legitimo. A la luz de la estructura y evolucion de las exigencias de reconocimiento reciproco y del concepto de libertad, se analizara el concepto material de delito, entendido este como menosprecio cualificado de las condiciones que garantizan la libertad social. En segundo lugar, se discutira el concepto de pena legitima, no solo en relacion a quien puede ser legitimamente llamado a responder por el Estado, problematizando concretamente el problema de castigar a los pobres, sino tambien que formas puede adoptar aquella en un Estado social, democratico y de derecho. EnglishThe goal of this paper is to analyze how recognition theories contribute to conceptualize some of the fundamental problems of the philosophy of criminal law, particularly: the concept of crime and the concept of legitimate punishment. In light of the structure and evolution of the requirements of reciprocal recognition and the concept of freedom, the concept of crime will be analyzed in terms of a qualified misrecognition of the conditions that guarantee social freedom. Secondly, I will discuss the concept of legitimate punishment, not only in relation to who can legitimately be called to respond by the State, focusing specifically on the problem of punishing the poor, but also what form can such punishment adopt in a social, democratic, and rule-of-law State.
{"title":"Reconocimiento, delito y pena: de Hegel a Honneth","authors":"Javier Cigüela Sola","doi":"10.4067/s0718-33992020000100202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992020000100202","url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl objetivo del presente trabajo es analizar el rendimiento que las teorias del reconocimiento ofrecen a la hora de conceptualizar algunos de los problemas fundamentales de la filosofia del Derecho Penal, particularmente: el concepto de delito y el concepto de castigo legitimo. A la luz de la estructura y evolucion de las exigencias de reconocimiento reciproco y del concepto de libertad, se analizara el concepto material de delito, entendido este como menosprecio cualificado de las condiciones que garantizan la libertad social. En segundo lugar, se discutira el concepto de pena legitima, no solo en relacion a quien puede ser legitimamente llamado a responder por el Estado, problematizando concretamente el problema de castigar a los pobres, sino tambien que formas puede adoptar aquella en un Estado social, democratico y de derecho. EnglishThe goal of this paper is to analyze how recognition theories contribute to conceptualize some of the fundamental problems of the philosophy of criminal law, particularly: the concept of crime and the concept of legitimate punishment. In light of the structure and evolution of the requirements of reciprocal recognition and the concept of freedom, the concept of crime will be analyzed in terms of a qualified misrecognition of the conditions that guarantee social freedom. Secondly, I will discuss the concept of legitimate punishment, not only in relation to who can legitimately be called to respond by the State, focusing specifically on the problem of punishing the poor, but also what form can such punishment adopt in a social, democratic, and rule-of-law State.","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70193563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-01DOI: 10.4067/s0718-33992020000100047
Carolina Villacampa
{"title":"Justicia restaurativa en supuestos de violencia de género en España: situación actual y propuesta político-criminal","authors":"Carolina Villacampa","doi":"10.4067/s0718-33992020000100047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992020000100047","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38693,"journal":{"name":"Politica Criminal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47685499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：