Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37053
C. Lafont
This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts.
本文是克里斯蒂娜•拉丰(Cristina Lafont)《没有捷径的民主》一书的一部分。
{"title":"Sticking to the Long Road of Participatory Democracy: Replies to my Critics","authors":"C. Lafont","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.37053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.37053","url":null,"abstract":"This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts.","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"35 1","pages":"144-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76142954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37056
Hauke Brunkhorst
This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts.
本文是克里斯蒂娜•拉丰(Cristina Lafont)《没有捷径的民主》一书的一部分。
{"title":"Randomized Mini-publics, Popular Will Formation and the Societal Conditions of Deliberative Learning Processes","authors":"Hauke Brunkhorst","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.37056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.37056","url":null,"abstract":"This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts.","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"73 1","pages":"136-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72521964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37086
Dorothea Gädeke
This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts.
本文是克里斯蒂娜•拉丰(Cristina Lafont)《没有捷径的民主》一书的一部分。
{"title":"Juridicocratic Shortcuts to the Long Participatory Road of Democracy?","authors":"Dorothea Gädeke","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.37086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.37086","url":null,"abstract":"This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts.","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"31 1 1","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72962039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37059
P. Pekelharing
This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont’s book Democracy without Shortcuts. DOI 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37059 Licence This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BYNC 3.0). Krisis 2020, issue 1
{"title":"Stuck. Or Why Democracy Can Be All Joy and No Fun","authors":"P. Pekelharing","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.37059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.37059","url":null,"abstract":"This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont’s book Democracy without Shortcuts. DOI 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37059 Licence This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BYNC 3.0). Krisis 2020, issue 1","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"13 1","pages":"119-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83126500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.36964
K. Vintges
Although for a long time, Dutch academic philosophy was characterized by a pluralism of – imported – philosophical frameworks and paradigms, in more recent decades, a type of ‘normal philosophy’, in the Kuhnian sense, has become dominant which aims to solve ethical and political problems and dilemmas through rational-normative argumentation. Contrary to what is often claimed, the new 'normal philosophy' amounts not to thinking ‘beyond the analytic-continental divide’ in a fruitful synthesis, but to the subsumption of continental philosophical themes and concepts under the analytic tradition. The potentially critical tenor of continental philosophy threatens to be ‘solved’ by this subsumption. ‘Normal philosophy’, with its emphasis on rational-normative argumentation, risks leading to a state philosophy that fits in with existing policy questions, ignoring systemic and structural power inequalities. I argue that the journal Krisis, in keeping with its original principles, should hang on to critical philosophical reflection, which today is needed more than ever, specifically – pace current right-wing and left-wing populist attacks on identity politics – on systemic, multiple forms of deprivation and oppression.
{"title":"Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'","authors":"K. Vintges","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.36964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.36964","url":null,"abstract":"Although for a long time, Dutch academic philosophy was characterized by a pluralism of – imported – philosophical frameworks and paradigms, in more recent decades, a type of ‘normal philosophy’, in the Kuhnian sense, has become dominant which aims to solve ethical and political problems and dilemmas through rational-normative argumentation. Contrary to what is often claimed, the new 'normal philosophy' amounts not to thinking ‘beyond the analytic-continental divide’ in a fruitful synthesis, but to the subsumption of continental philosophical themes and concepts under the analytic tradition. The potentially critical tenor of continental philosophy threatens to be ‘solved’ by this subsumption. ‘Normal philosophy’, with its emphasis on rational-normative argumentation, risks leading to a state philosophy that fits in with existing policy questions, ignoring systemic and structural power inequalities. I argue that the journal Krisis, in keeping with its original principles, should hang on to critical philosophical reflection, which today is needed more than ever, specifically – pace current right-wing and left-wing populist attacks on identity politics – on systemic, multiple forms of deprivation and oppression.","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"14 1","pages":"9-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88451519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37055
T. Vervoort
Dit essay begrijpt het project van Krisis vanuit ‘het epistemologische probleem van de kritische theorie’, namelijk: vanuit welk standpunt is emancipatoire kritiek überhaupt mogelijk? Door de kritische theorie in brede zin op te vatten, worden vormen van politieke contestatie en de theoretisering daarvan die vaak als 'identiteitspolitiek' worden weggezet besproken in relatie tot de vroege denkers van de kritische theorie (Lukács, Adorno, Horkheimer) en het late werk van Foucault over tegengedrag.
{"title":"Krisis, identiteit en kritiek","authors":"T. Vervoort","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.37055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.37055","url":null,"abstract":"Dit essay begrijpt het project van Krisis vanuit ‘het epistemologische probleem van de kritische theorie’, namelijk: vanuit welk standpunt is emancipatoire kritiek überhaupt mogelijk? Door de kritische theorie in brede zin op te vatten, worden vormen van politieke contestatie en de theoretisering daarvan die vaak als 'identiteitspolitiek' worden weggezet besproken in relatie tot de vroege denkers van de kritische theorie (Lukács, Adorno, Horkheimer) en het late werk van Foucault over tegengedrag.\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"23 1","pages":"60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80031940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37058
Liesbeth Schoonheim
This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts
本文是克里斯蒂娜•拉丰(Cristina Lafont)《没有捷径的民主》一书的一部分
{"title":"Politics and Power. Notes on Lafont’s Hermeneutics of Democracy","authors":"Liesbeth Schoonheim","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.37058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.37058","url":null,"abstract":"This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"5 1","pages":"126-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78669653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37087
Lisa Herzog
This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts.
本文是克里斯蒂娜•拉丰(Cristina Lafont)《没有捷径的民主》一书的一部分。
{"title":"Two challenges for participatory deliberative democracy: expertise and the workplace","authors":"Lisa Herzog","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.37087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.37087","url":null,"abstract":"This essay is part of a dossier on Cristina Lafont's book Democracy without Shortcuts.","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"10 1","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87642642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.36969
Oana Crusmac
Review of Rainer Forst (2017) Normativity and Power. Analyzing Social Orders of Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
《规范性与权力》(2017)述评。分析正当性的社会秩序。牛津:牛津大学出版社。
{"title":"Justice Is Always a Relational Matter. On Forst’s Normativity and Power","authors":"Oana Crusmac","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.36969","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.36969","url":null,"abstract":"Review of Rainer Forst (2017) Normativity and Power. Analyzing Social Orders of Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"27 1","pages":"203-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89915634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-11DOI: 10.21827/krisis.40.1.37120
René Gabriëls
Introduction to a dossier on Cristina Lafont's Democracy without Shortcuts
克里斯蒂娜·拉丰的“没有捷径的民主”档案简介
{"title":"Participation and Deliberation: Introduction to a Dossier on Cristina Lafont's Democracy without Shortcuts","authors":"René Gabriëls","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.37120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.37120","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to a dossier on Cristina Lafont's Democracy without Shortcuts","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"20 1","pages":"68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91273892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：