Pub Date : 2023-10-09DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2265783
Seyed Mohammad Jamasbi, Arash Ghazvineh
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with regard to this study.Notes1 Directed by Brad Bird. 2007. USA: Walt Disney Pictures, Pixar Animation Studios.2 Directed by Oliver Stone. 1986. USA: Hemdale Film Corporation.3 Directed by Charlie Chaplin. 1936. USA: Charles Chaplin Productions.4 Also known as Koyaanisqatsi: Life out of Balance. 1982. USA: American Zoetrope, IRE Productions, Santa Fe Institute for Regional Education.5 Directed by Jon Favreau. 2019. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.6 Directed by Byron Howard and Rich Moore. 2016. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.7 Directed by Francis Ford Coppola. 1972. USA: Paramount Pictures, Albert S. Ruddy Productions, Alfran Productions.8 Directed by Ryusuke Hamaguchi. 2021. Japan: Bitters End, C&I Entertainment, Culture Entertainment, et al.9 Directed by Lars Von Trier. 2003. Denmark and et al: Zentropa Entertainments and et al.10 Directed by Alfred Hitchcock. 1948. USA: Transatlantic Pictures.11 Directed by Albert Lamorisse. 1978. France.12 It is an American animated comedy television series. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.13 It is an American animated short films. USA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer14 A film series directed by David Yates. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures.15 Directed by Clint Eastwood. 2014. USA: Village Roadshow Pictures and et al.16 Directed by Moustapha Akkad. 1976. Lebanon and et al: Filmco International Productions Inc.17 Directed by Asghar Farhadi. 2021. Iran and France: Asghar Farhadi Production, et al.18 Directed by Sergio Leone. 1966. Italy: Produzioni Europee Assiociate and United Artists.19 Directed by James Marsh. 2014. United Kingdom and et al: Working Title Films.20 Directed by Akira Kurosawa. 1950. Japan: Daiei Film.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSeyed Mohammad JamasbiSeyed Mohammad Jamasbi is a Master’s graduate of Animation in the Faculty of Arts, Tarbiat Modares University in Tehran. He completed his bachelor degree in Visual Communication from the Art University of Isfahan, Iran. Jamasbi is widely interested in semiotics and cinema semiotics.Arash GhazvinehArash Ghazvineh is a PhD candidate in Arts Research at Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. He completed his master’s in Dramatic Literature at the same university with a thesis on the intersemiotic translation from dramatic texts to films. His research centers on multimodality, sign-processes and semiosis and cultural semiotics.
利益冲突声明作者声明本研究不存在利益冲突。注1:布拉德·伯德导演。2007。美国:华特迪士尼电影公司,皮克斯动画工作室。1986年,奥利弗·斯通导演。美国:亨代尔电影公司。1936年,查理·卓别林导演。美国:查尔斯·卓别林作品。又称Koyaanisqatsi:《失去平衡的生活》,1982年。美国:美国西洋镜,IRE制片公司,圣达菲地区教育研究所,导演Jon Favreau, 2019。美国:华特迪士尼影业,拜伦·霍华德和里奇·摩尔导演,2016。美国:华特迪士尼影业。导演:弗朗西斯·福特·科波拉。1972。美国:派拉蒙影业,艾伯特·s·拉迪制片公司,阿尔弗兰制片公司。滨口龙助导演。2021。日本:苦涩的结局,C&I娱乐,文化娱乐等。导演:拉斯·冯·提尔。2003。丹麦等人:Zentropa娱乐公司等人。阿尔弗雷德·希区柯克导演。1948年。美国:跨大西洋影业,艾伯特·拉莫里斯导演,1978年。这是一部美国动画喜剧电视连续剧。美国:华特迪士尼电影公司。这是一部美国动画短片。美国:米高梅电影公司由大卫·耶茨执导的系列电影。美国:华纳兄弟影业。导演:克林特·伊斯特伍德。2014。美国:穆斯塔法·阿卡德导演的乡村路演电影等。1976。黎巴嫩等:Filmco国际制片公司,导演阿斯哈尔·法哈蒂,2021年。伊朗和法国:阿斯哈尔·法哈迪制片公司等。18塞尔吉奥·莱昂内导演。1966。意大利:produczioni Europee associate and United Artists.19,导演:James Marsh, 2014。英国等:暂定片名电影。20,导演:黑泽明。1950。日本:大荣影业。作者简介:seyed Mohammad Jamasbi是德黑兰Tarbiat Modares大学艺术学院动画专业的硕士毕业生。他在伊朗伊斯法罕艺术大学获得视觉传达学士学位。Jamasbi对符号学和电影符号学有着广泛的兴趣。Arash Ghazvineh是伊朗德黑兰Tarbiat Modares大学艺术研究专业的博士候选人。他在同一所大学完成了戏剧文学硕士学位,并发表了一篇关于戏剧文本到电影的符号化翻译的论文。他的研究主要集中在多模态、符号过程、符号学和文化符号学。
{"title":"A Multimodal Analysis of Films: Toward a Peircean Framework","authors":"Seyed Mohammad Jamasbi, Arash Ghazvineh","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2265783","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2265783","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with regard to this study.Notes1 Directed by Brad Bird. 2007. USA: Walt Disney Pictures, Pixar Animation Studios.2 Directed by Oliver Stone. 1986. USA: Hemdale Film Corporation.3 Directed by Charlie Chaplin. 1936. USA: Charles Chaplin Productions.4 Also known as Koyaanisqatsi: Life out of Balance. 1982. USA: American Zoetrope, IRE Productions, Santa Fe Institute for Regional Education.5 Directed by Jon Favreau. 2019. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.6 Directed by Byron Howard and Rich Moore. 2016. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.7 Directed by Francis Ford Coppola. 1972. USA: Paramount Pictures, Albert S. Ruddy Productions, Alfran Productions.8 Directed by Ryusuke Hamaguchi. 2021. Japan: Bitters End, C&I Entertainment, Culture Entertainment, et al.9 Directed by Lars Von Trier. 2003. Denmark and et al: Zentropa Entertainments and et al.10 Directed by Alfred Hitchcock. 1948. USA: Transatlantic Pictures.11 Directed by Albert Lamorisse. 1978. France.12 It is an American animated comedy television series. USA: Walt Disney Pictures.13 It is an American animated short films. USA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer14 A film series directed by David Yates. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures.15 Directed by Clint Eastwood. 2014. USA: Village Roadshow Pictures and et al.16 Directed by Moustapha Akkad. 1976. Lebanon and et al: Filmco International Productions Inc.17 Directed by Asghar Farhadi. 2021. Iran and France: Asghar Farhadi Production, et al.18 Directed by Sergio Leone. 1966. Italy: Produzioni Europee Assiociate and United Artists.19 Directed by James Marsh. 2014. United Kingdom and et al: Working Title Films.20 Directed by Akira Kurosawa. 1950. Japan: Daiei Film.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSeyed Mohammad JamasbiSeyed Mohammad Jamasbi is a Master’s graduate of Animation in the Faculty of Arts, Tarbiat Modares University in Tehran. He completed his bachelor degree in Visual Communication from the Art University of Isfahan, Iran. Jamasbi is widely interested in semiotics and cinema semiotics.Arash GhazvinehArash Ghazvineh is a PhD candidate in Arts Research at Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. He completed his master’s in Dramatic Literature at the same university with a thesis on the intersemiotic translation from dramatic texts to films. His research centers on multimodality, sign-processes and semiosis and cultural semiotics.","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135141232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-02DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2264148
Sumallya Mukhopadhyay
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 The issue discussed here is in context of developing a national register to identify bona fide citizens of India in the region of Assam. In Assam, the first National Register of Citizens (NRC) was conducted in 1951. The publication of the second NRC in 2019 stripped 1.9 million individuals off their citizenship [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/19-lakh-left-out-final-assam-nrc-elicits-anger-sense-of-betrayal/articleshow/70930061.cms] accessed 23 February 2020. For a detailed commentary on citizenship issue in Assam, see Baruah, Sanjib. 2015. “Partition and the Politics of Citizenship in Assam.” In Partition: The Long Shadow, 78–101. New Delhi: Viking-Penguin.2 For a comprehensive discussion on the 1947 Partition and caste, see Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar, and Anasua Basu Ray Chaudhury. 2022. Caste and Partition in Bengal: The Story of Dalit Refugees, 1946–1961. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.3 To derive an understanding of the condition of women during 1947, See Butalia, Urvashi. 1998. The Other Side of Silence: Voices from the Partition of India. New Delhi: Penguin Books; Chakraborty, Poulomi. 2018. The Refugee Woman: Partition of Bengal, Gender and the Political. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSumallya MukhopadhyaySumallya Mukhopadhyay is Assistant Professor in the Department of English, School of Media Studies and Humanities, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Delhi-NCR, India. His area of interest, among other things, includes narratives related to the 1947 Partition. He has been awarded the TATA Trusts – Partition Archive Research Grant (2021) and South Asia Speaks Fellowship (2022). In 2023, he has received the International Oral History Association Scholarship.
{"title":"“To Give Voice to the Voiceless”: An Interview with Tanvir Mokammel","authors":"Sumallya Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2264148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2264148","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 The issue discussed here is in context of developing a national register to identify bona fide citizens of India in the region of Assam. In Assam, the first National Register of Citizens (NRC) was conducted in 1951. The publication of the second NRC in 2019 stripped 1.9 million individuals off their citizenship [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/19-lakh-left-out-final-assam-nrc-elicits-anger-sense-of-betrayal/articleshow/70930061.cms] accessed 23 February 2020. For a detailed commentary on citizenship issue in Assam, see Baruah, Sanjib. 2015. “Partition and the Politics of Citizenship in Assam.” In Partition: The Long Shadow, 78–101. New Delhi: Viking-Penguin.2 For a comprehensive discussion on the 1947 Partition and caste, see Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar, and Anasua Basu Ray Chaudhury. 2022. Caste and Partition in Bengal: The Story of Dalit Refugees, 1946–1961. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.3 To derive an understanding of the condition of women during 1947, See Butalia, Urvashi. 1998. The Other Side of Silence: Voices from the Partition of India. New Delhi: Penguin Books; Chakraborty, Poulomi. 2018. The Refugee Woman: Partition of Bengal, Gender and the Political. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSumallya MukhopadhyaySumallya Mukhopadhyay is Assistant Professor in the Department of English, School of Media Studies and Humanities, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Delhi-NCR, India. His area of interest, among other things, includes narratives related to the 1947 Partition. He has been awarded the TATA Trusts – Partition Archive Research Grant (2021) and South Asia Speaks Fellowship (2022). In 2023, he has received the International Oral History Association Scholarship.","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135828668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-28DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2261358
Delia Malia Konzett
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 See Michael Rogin. 1996. Blackface, White Noise: Jewish Immigrants in the Hollywood Melting Pot; Richard Dyer. Citation1997. White; Daniel Bernardi. Citation1996. Ed. Race and the Emergence of U.S. Cinema; Bernardi Citation2001. Ed. Classic Hollywood Classic Whiteness.2 See James Baldwin. Citation1975. The Devil Finds Work; bell hooks.1996. Reel to Real. Race, class and sex at the movies; Cedric J. Robinson. 2007. Forgeries of Memory & Meaning: Blacks & The Regime of Race in American Theater & Film Before World War II; Ellen C. Scott. 2015. Cinema Civil Rights: Regulation, Repression, and Race in the Classical Hollywood Era3 The Devil Finds Work 1975, 41.4 See Donald Bogle’s extensive study of minstrelsy stereotypes informing the representation of Black characters in Hollywood: Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies, & Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films.5 See Susan Courtney’s discussion of Jack Johnson’s prize fights and their public reception as well as the ensuing censorship of them in 1912 ending their national dissemination, particularly chapter 2 “The Mixed Birth of ‘Great White’ Masculinity and the Classical Spectator” (Hollywood Fantasies 2004, 30-61).6 Johnny Weissmuller came on the scene as a white swimming miracle, beating the Native Hawaiian Duke Kahanamoku, the reigning Olympic champion, at the 1924 summer Olympics in Paris. Kahanamoku, known as the father of modern surfing, had dominated the swimming sport, not unlike Jack Johnson in boxing, since 1912. After ending his swimming career, he also went into the film industry and played minor stereotyped roles, most notably in Wake of the Red Witch (1948), starring as the head of a Polynesian tribe alongside John Wayne. Unlike Weissmuller, he was never given a lead role in line with Hollywood’s racially divided casting practices.7 See my essay “The South Pacific as the Final Frontier: Hollywood’s South Seas Fantasies, the Beachcomber, and Militarization,” 13-25. Cinematic Settlers: The Settler Colonial World in Film. Eds. Janne Lahti and Rebecca Weaver-Hightower. 2020. The beachcomber, as I maintain, is an expression of a civilizational drop-out indulging in a fantasy of South Seas escapism. The 1930s also gives birth to the Charlie Chan series with its attempt, not unlike Tarzan’s dominance of Africa, to subsume Asia and Asian Americans under the imperial hegemony of the US. While it may give increased voice to its Asian detective mostly uncovering white crimes, it also contains his work in Western fantasies of Orientalism. Earl Derr Biggers, similar to Edgar Burroughs, invented a new way of seeing Asia as both exemplary and subservient to Western interests. See my discussion of the conflicted race and global mapping in the Chan series and its articulation of an Asian action body, “Yellowface, Minstrelsy, and Hollywood Happy Endings: The Black Camel (1931), Charlie Chan in Egypt (1935) and Charlie Chan at t
单击可增大图像大小单击可减小图像大小注1参见Michael Rogin. 1996。黑脸、白噪音:好莱坞大熔炉中的犹太移民理查德·代尔。Citation1997。白色;丹尼尔·贝尔纳迪。Citation1996。编者:种族与美国电影的出现;贝尔纳迪Citation2001。经典好莱坞经典白2见詹姆斯·鲍德温。Citation1975。魔鬼找到工作;贝尔hooks.1996。卷轴到现实。电影中的种族、阶级和性;塞德里克·j·罗宾逊,2007。记忆与意义的伪造:二战前美国戏剧与电影中的黑人与种族制度Ellen C. Scott, 2015。《电影民权:经典好莱坞时代的管制、压制和种族》魔鬼找工作1975年,41.4参见Donald Bogle对好莱坞黑人角色的刻板印象的广泛研究:汤姆、黑人、黑白混血儿、嬷嬷和雄鹿。5参见苏珊·考特尼对杰克·约翰逊的职业拳击赛的讨论,他们的公众接受,以及随后在1912年对他们的审查,结束了他们的全国传播,特别是第二章“‘伟大的白人’男子气概和古典观众的混合诞生”(好莱坞幻想2004年,30-61)约翰尼·韦斯穆勒(Johnny Weissmuller)在1924年巴黎夏季奥运会上击败了当时的奥运冠军、夏威夷土著公爵卡哈纳莫库(Duke Kahanamoku),成为了一个白色游泳奇迹。卡哈纳莫库被称为现代冲浪之父,自1912年以来一直统治着游泳运动,就像杰克·约翰逊(Jack Johnson)统治拳击一样。在结束游泳生涯后,他也进入了电影行业,扮演了一些小角色,最著名的是在1948年的《红女巫的觉醒》(Wake of the Red Witch)中,与约翰·韦恩(John Wayne)一起主演波利尼西亚部落的首领。与韦斯穆勒不同的是,他从来没有出演过主角,这与好莱坞种族分裂的选角惯例是一致的参见我的文章《南太平洋是最后的边疆:好莱坞的南海幻想、海滩流浪汉和军事化》,13-25页。电影移民:电影中的移民殖民世界。Eds。珍妮·拉赫蒂和丽贝卡·韦弗-海托华。2020. 我认为,海滩拾荒者是一种文明落伍者沉迷于南海逃避现实的幻想的表现。20世纪30年代也诞生了陈查理系列,它试图将亚洲和亚裔美国人纳入美国的帝国霸权之下,就像泰山对非洲的统治一样。虽然它可能会给主要揭露白人犯罪的亚洲侦探提供更多的发言权,但它也包含了他在西方东方主义幻想中的作品。厄尔·德尔·比格斯(Earl Derr Biggers)与埃德加·巴勒斯(Edgar Burroughs)相似,发明了一种新的方式,将亚洲视为西方利益的典范和附庸。请看我在《黄脸、吟曲和好莱坞大喜结局:黑骆驼》(1931)、《陈查理在埃及》(1935)和《陈查理在奥运会》(1937)中对成龙系列中种族冲突和全球映射的讨论,以及它对亚洲动作身体的表达。迪莉娅·玛利亚·康泽特。Citation2020。好莱坞在种族和身份的交汇处。8参见瑞恩·杰伊·弗里德曼的《好莱坞的非裔美国人电影:向有声电影的过渡》。Citation2011。本研究提供了一个广泛的讨论工作室倡议,以纳入非裔美国人的主题和演员在新的声音时代。另见弗里德曼的《独自一人:交叉性、非裔美国专业表演者和埃莉诺·鲍威尔》,载于《好莱坞种族与身份的交叉点》,122-140页。迪莉娅·玛利亚·康泽特,2020。这一章说明了非裔美国人独立的特色表演的实践,这些表演可以在南方影院被剪掉,而不会对电影的叙事做出任何妥协例如,艾伦·c·斯科特(Ellen C. Scott)提到,纽约州的审查机构确实淡化了“一个黑白种族冲突的场景”(1989),即W.S.范·戴克(W.S. Van Dyke)的种族冒险电影《商人号角》(Trader Horn, 1931)中白人被当地人勒死的声音,之后是他的《人猿泰山》(Tarzan the Ape Man, 1932)。电影民权:经典好莱坞时代的管制、压制和种族。2015。在《人猿泰山》系列中,当地人暴死时的声音并没有经过这样的审查参见艾伦·c·斯科特在《电影民权》中对夏洛特·克伦普的全国有色人种协进会抗议这部电影及其公然违反OWI指导方针的讨论。根据黛安·内格拉和伊翁·塔斯克(Negra and Tasker Citation2019, 111)的说法,在当代流行文化中,“为了回应白人男性感受到的权威丧失”,恢复或重新界定白人男性气概的修辞仍然可以找到。他们声称,虽然受到了一些多样性的影响,但最近的烹饪节目往往以白人男性为中心(例如乔恩·费儒的《厨师》或当前的电视连续剧《食客》或《汽车餐厅和潜水》),食品卡车文化和公路旅行唤起了拓荒者时代白人粗犷的男子气概。
{"title":"The Dysmorphic Masculine Body of Hollywood: Tarzan, Rocky, and Creed","authors":"Delia Malia Konzett","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2261358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2261358","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 See Michael Rogin. 1996. Blackface, White Noise: Jewish Immigrants in the Hollywood Melting Pot; Richard Dyer. Citation1997. White; Daniel Bernardi. Citation1996. Ed. Race and the Emergence of U.S. Cinema; Bernardi Citation2001. Ed. Classic Hollywood Classic Whiteness.2 See James Baldwin. Citation1975. The Devil Finds Work; bell hooks.1996. Reel to Real. Race, class and sex at the movies; Cedric J. Robinson. 2007. Forgeries of Memory & Meaning: Blacks & The Regime of Race in American Theater & Film Before World War II; Ellen C. Scott. 2015. Cinema Civil Rights: Regulation, Repression, and Race in the Classical Hollywood Era3 The Devil Finds Work 1975, 41.4 See Donald Bogle’s extensive study of minstrelsy stereotypes informing the representation of Black characters in Hollywood: Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies, & Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films.5 See Susan Courtney’s discussion of Jack Johnson’s prize fights and their public reception as well as the ensuing censorship of them in 1912 ending their national dissemination, particularly chapter 2 “The Mixed Birth of ‘Great White’ Masculinity and the Classical Spectator” (Hollywood Fantasies 2004, 30-61).6 Johnny Weissmuller came on the scene as a white swimming miracle, beating the Native Hawaiian Duke Kahanamoku, the reigning Olympic champion, at the 1924 summer Olympics in Paris. Kahanamoku, known as the father of modern surfing, had dominated the swimming sport, not unlike Jack Johnson in boxing, since 1912. After ending his swimming career, he also went into the film industry and played minor stereotyped roles, most notably in Wake of the Red Witch (1948), starring as the head of a Polynesian tribe alongside John Wayne. Unlike Weissmuller, he was never given a lead role in line with Hollywood’s racially divided casting practices.7 See my essay “The South Pacific as the Final Frontier: Hollywood’s South Seas Fantasies, the Beachcomber, and Militarization,” 13-25. Cinematic Settlers: The Settler Colonial World in Film. Eds. Janne Lahti and Rebecca Weaver-Hightower. 2020. The beachcomber, as I maintain, is an expression of a civilizational drop-out indulging in a fantasy of South Seas escapism. The 1930s also gives birth to the Charlie Chan series with its attempt, not unlike Tarzan’s dominance of Africa, to subsume Asia and Asian Americans under the imperial hegemony of the US. While it may give increased voice to its Asian detective mostly uncovering white crimes, it also contains his work in Western fantasies of Orientalism. Earl Derr Biggers, similar to Edgar Burroughs, invented a new way of seeing Asia as both exemplary and subservient to Western interests. See my discussion of the conflicted race and global mapping in the Chan series and its articulation of an Asian action body, “Yellowface, Minstrelsy, and Hollywood Happy Endings: The Black Camel (1931), Charlie Chan in Egypt (1935) and Charlie Chan at t","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-28DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2259264
Mehul Agarwal, Pranta Pratik Patnaik
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
点击放大图片点击缩小图片披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
{"title":"(Re)Visiting Masculinities in Indian Television Soap Operas","authors":"Mehul Agarwal, Pranta Pratik Patnaik","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2259264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2259264","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135420131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-27DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2261360
Bhairab Barman
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgmentsThis essay could not have been written without the generous assistance of Jadavpur University Professor Moinak Biswas, Head of the Department of Film Studies. He gave me the opportunity to explore and collect rare vernacular materials on Ghatak, without which this article could not be written. Thanks to my supervisor Parichay Patra and other colleagues for their generous engagements. I extend my gratitude to the anonymous reviewers too.Additional informationNotes on contributorsBhairab BarmanBhairab Barman is a doctoral research candidate at the School of Liberal Arts, IIT Jodhpur. His current research focuses on the esthetics of space in the films of Ritwik Ghatak. He is a regular contributor at international conferences on film esthetics.
{"title":"The City Space in Ritwik Ghatak’s Films","authors":"Bhairab Barman","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2261360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2261360","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgmentsThis essay could not have been written without the generous assistance of Jadavpur University Professor Moinak Biswas, Head of the Department of Film Studies. He gave me the opportunity to explore and collect rare vernacular materials on Ghatak, without which this article could not be written. Thanks to my supervisor Parichay Patra and other colleagues for their generous engagements. I extend my gratitude to the anonymous reviewers too.Additional informationNotes on contributorsBhairab BarmanBhairab Barman is a doctoral research candidate at the School of Liberal Arts, IIT Jodhpur. His current research focuses on the esthetics of space in the films of Ritwik Ghatak. He is a regular contributor at international conferences on film esthetics.","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135536032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-26DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2261359
Hamid Taheri
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 Modesty rules were embedded in Iranian society and culture even before the Islamic Republic but after it they became governmental laws.2 On early censorship, see Akrami, Jamshid. 1991. "Cinema. IV. Film Censorship." Encyclopædia Iranica, 585–586. London: Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation.3 Interesting that even 7 years after the Hamoon, Ministry of Culture and Guidance insisted that “body contact between m e n and women” is prohibited. See: Zeydabadi-Nejad, Saeed. 2011. The Politics of Iranian Cinema. London: Routledge.4 It is important to note that some insider directors like Ebrahim Hatamikia, Behrouz Afkhami, etc. can benefit from touching in all its non-sexualized manners which can be a source of confusion for studying male/female physical touch in Iran cinema, however, it should be considered that these directors live outside of the norms or rules and what they present cannot in any way be applied to the rest of Iranian cinema.5 Cinema in post-revolution Iran is mainly a middle and upper class phenomenon. There are many films that attract the lower class as well but it is not this class, which is usually more traditional, that supports cinema. Therefore, many directors such as Farhadi, Mehrhjui, Beizai, Kiarostami, and many more target the middle-class audience. They have also emerged from the middle and upper class background themselves. Moreover, I am using class as a cultural factor as well as an economic one. Lower class traditional people in Iran have different filmic culture in which many films that target them either feature sexualized women (to the extent allowed by the censorship and in mostly comedies) or overly modest women (like many TV shows) and rarely exhibit the violent touch.6 See: Smith, Murray. 1995. Engaging Characters, 82. Oxford: Clarendon Press.7 Although in Iranian cinema through modesty rules sexual intercourse cannot be depicted, it can be referred to, like many storyline in which female characters get pregnant.8 In other words, Mahrams cannot weaken males by sexuality because sex with non-wife maharams is forbidden and sex with wives is encouraged. Withholding sex by wife is also out of the question in Islam. Thus mahrams are rendered powerless with regards to sexual powers.9 It may be argued that the religious figures and everyday use of language may differ in Iran but even if we consider them different, it only adds more ambiguity about the core value, since it adds a level of political considerations to the language. Islam is a political religion and political language is more often than not veiled and ambigious.10 See: Milani, Farzaneh. 1992. Veils and Words: The Emerging Voices of Iranian Women Writers. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.11 It is illuminating to say that castration in Islamic societies has also a literal meaning. Men who had to work in harams of Shah/Amir had to be castrated so they would not be able to have sexual intercourse
{"title":"The Pleasure of the Violent Touch in Iranian Narrative Cinema","authors":"Hamid Taheri","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2261359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2261359","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 Modesty rules were embedded in Iranian society and culture even before the Islamic Republic but after it they became governmental laws.2 On early censorship, see Akrami, Jamshid. 1991. \"Cinema. IV. Film Censorship.\" Encyclopædia Iranica, 585–586. London: Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation.3 Interesting that even 7 years after the Hamoon, Ministry of Culture and Guidance insisted that “body contact between m e n and women” is prohibited. See: Zeydabadi-Nejad, Saeed. 2011. The Politics of Iranian Cinema. London: Routledge.4 It is important to note that some insider directors like Ebrahim Hatamikia, Behrouz Afkhami, etc. can benefit from touching in all its non-sexualized manners which can be a source of confusion for studying male/female physical touch in Iran cinema, however, it should be considered that these directors live outside of the norms or rules and what they present cannot in any way be applied to the rest of Iranian cinema.5 Cinema in post-revolution Iran is mainly a middle and upper class phenomenon. There are many films that attract the lower class as well but it is not this class, which is usually more traditional, that supports cinema. Therefore, many directors such as Farhadi, Mehrhjui, Beizai, Kiarostami, and many more target the middle-class audience. They have also emerged from the middle and upper class background themselves. Moreover, I am using class as a cultural factor as well as an economic one. Lower class traditional people in Iran have different filmic culture in which many films that target them either feature sexualized women (to the extent allowed by the censorship and in mostly comedies) or overly modest women (like many TV shows) and rarely exhibit the violent touch.6 See: Smith, Murray. 1995. Engaging Characters, 82. Oxford: Clarendon Press.7 Although in Iranian cinema through modesty rules sexual intercourse cannot be depicted, it can be referred to, like many storyline in which female characters get pregnant.8 In other words, Mahrams cannot weaken males by sexuality because sex with non-wife maharams is forbidden and sex with wives is encouraged. Withholding sex by wife is also out of the question in Islam. Thus mahrams are rendered powerless with regards to sexual powers.9 It may be argued that the religious figures and everyday use of language may differ in Iran but even if we consider them different, it only adds more ambiguity about the core value, since it adds a level of political considerations to the language. Islam is a political religion and political language is more often than not veiled and ambigious.10 See: Milani, Farzaneh. 1992. Veils and Words: The Emerging Voices of Iranian Women Writers. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.11 It is illuminating to say that castration in Islamic societies has also a literal meaning. Men who had to work in harams of Shah/Amir had to be castrated so they would not be able to have sexual intercourse ","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134958498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-26DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2262352
Shubham Pathak, Swasti Mishra
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
点击放大图片点击缩小图片披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
{"title":"Discursive Strategies of Women’s Use of Their Beauty and Body for Revenge: A Comparative Study of Classical and Contemporary Hindi Films","authors":"Shubham Pathak, Swasti Mishra","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2262352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2262352","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134958623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-25DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2257573
Eloise Ross
{"title":"When Film Breathes: Topographies of Silence and Not-Quite-Sound","authors":"Eloise Ross","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2257573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2257573","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135816243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-23DOI: 10.1080/10509208.2023.2261343
David Sterritt
{"title":"Celebrating Silent Cinema, Film Restoration, and Milestone","authors":"David Sterritt","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2261343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2261343","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135959930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 It is imperative to note here that when we speak of Indian films, we must take into account the fact that there is some amount of film production in every major Indian language and there are at least six important non-Hindi film industries: Bengali, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Tamil, and Telugu.2 In 1960, the government set up the Film Finance Corporation, which merged with the Motion Picture Export Association in 1980 to form the National Film Development Corporation, for financing and exporting films, and in 1961established the Film Institute in Poona. In 1973, the government established the Directorate of Film Festivals, shoes brief was to organize the annual International Film Festival.3 Explicating the armed struggle in Iran, Jazani (Citation1979) delineates the role of the “guerrilla” and exhorts the prospective guerrilla from falling prey to adventurism in the form of “too much emphasis on the role of the ‘fedaee’, resorting to constant invocations of ‘martyrdom’ to offset the absence of a mass movement, and the belief that the sacrifice of blood is sufficient for the start of the revolution”. The reference to “fedaee” or “fidayeen” is significant for observers of terrorist violence in the twentieth century, particularly in the post-September 11 scenario.4 Bush, W. Stephen, “Motion Picture Men Greet President,” Moving Picture World (12 February 1916), pps. 923+. “First Board of Trade Banquet, Attended by President Wilson, Marks New Era in Industry,” Motion Picture News (12 February 1916), 817–18.5 Universal advertisement, Moving Picture World (5 May 1917), 706. Ibid, 810. Universal advertisement, ibid, 820. Moving Picture World (3 August 1918), 703. “Shot ‘Beast of Berlin,’” Variety (12 April 1918), 47.6 How Indian cinema helped fight fascism during World War II (newslaundry.com)7 For a detailed understanding of the categorization refer to Mamdani (Citation2002) and Sengupta (Citation2020).8 Sengupta (Citation2019).9 Daiya (Citation2008, 178).10 “‘Gadar’ at Agra,” The Hindu, Sunday July 15, 2001.11 “‘Gadar’ at Agra,” The Hindu, Sunday July 15, 2001 cited in Daiya (Citation2008).12 Daiya.13 Daiya, 165.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRoshni SenguptaRoshni Sengupta is Associate Professor, School of Modern Media, UPES, India.Amaresh JhaAmaresh Jha is Associate Professor, School of Modern Media, UPES, India.Devanjan KhuntiaDevanjan Khuntia is an independent researcherPavan KumarPavan Kumar is Assistant Professor, Ambedkar University, New Delhi, India.Kaustav PadmapatiKaustav Padmapati is Assistant Professor, School of Modern Media, UPES, India.
{"title":"Indian Screen Cultures and the Redefinition of Nationhood: The Evolution of Contemporary Productions and the Myth of ‘National Security’","authors":"Roshni Sengupta, Amaresh Jha, Devanjan Khuntia, Pavan Kumar, Kaustav Padmapati","doi":"10.1080/10509208.2023.2258743","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2258743","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 It is imperative to note here that when we speak of Indian films, we must take into account the fact that there is some amount of film production in every major Indian language and there are at least six important non-Hindi film industries: Bengali, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Tamil, and Telugu.2 In 1960, the government set up the Film Finance Corporation, which merged with the Motion Picture Export Association in 1980 to form the National Film Development Corporation, for financing and exporting films, and in 1961established the Film Institute in Poona. In 1973, the government established the Directorate of Film Festivals, shoes brief was to organize the annual International Film Festival.3 Explicating the armed struggle in Iran, Jazani (Citation1979) delineates the role of the “guerrilla” and exhorts the prospective guerrilla from falling prey to adventurism in the form of “too much emphasis on the role of the ‘fedaee’, resorting to constant invocations of ‘martyrdom’ to offset the absence of a mass movement, and the belief that the sacrifice of blood is sufficient for the start of the revolution”. The reference to “fedaee” or “fidayeen” is significant for observers of terrorist violence in the twentieth century, particularly in the post-September 11 scenario.4 Bush, W. Stephen, “Motion Picture Men Greet President,” Moving Picture World (12 February 1916), pps. 923+. “First Board of Trade Banquet, Attended by President Wilson, Marks New Era in Industry,” Motion Picture News (12 February 1916), 817–18.5 Universal advertisement, Moving Picture World (5 May 1917), 706. Ibid, 810. Universal advertisement, ibid, 820. Moving Picture World (3 August 1918), 703. “Shot ‘Beast of Berlin,’” Variety (12 April 1918), 47.6 How Indian cinema helped fight fascism during World War II (newslaundry.com)7 For a detailed understanding of the categorization refer to Mamdani (Citation2002) and Sengupta (Citation2020).8 Sengupta (Citation2019).9 Daiya (Citation2008, 178).10 “‘Gadar’ at Agra,” The Hindu, Sunday July 15, 2001.11 “‘Gadar’ at Agra,” The Hindu, Sunday July 15, 2001 cited in Daiya (Citation2008).12 Daiya.13 Daiya, 165.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRoshni SenguptaRoshni Sengupta is Associate Professor, School of Modern Media, UPES, India.Amaresh JhaAmaresh Jha is Associate Professor, School of Modern Media, UPES, India.Devanjan KhuntiaDevanjan Khuntia is an independent researcherPavan KumarPavan Kumar is Assistant Professor, Ambedkar University, New Delhi, India.Kaustav PadmapatiKaustav Padmapati is Assistant Professor, School of Modern Media, UPES, India.","PeriodicalId":39016,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Film and Video","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136059497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}