Pub Date : 2022-04-03DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2099463
Y. Ontiveros, F. Cappa, N. Andino, C. Campos, C. Borghi, S. Giannoni
ABSTRACT The main driver of biodiversity loss and subsequent decreases in ecosystem functionality is undeniably human interference, destruction and encroachment. The creation and establishment of protected areas serve as tools for guaranteeing biodiversity conservation. In this study, we examined the diversity of medium- and large-sized mammals and flightless walking birds that are supported by a protected area system, the Ischigualasto–Talampaya system, and its area of influence. We set up 106 camera traps and analysed all data with rank–abundance curves and Hill numbers as a measure of diversity. Species richness was lower in protected areas, unlike in the buffer zone, due to the absence of domestic species. Native species were present all over the area, but with variations in their abundances, showing that the presence of domestic species in low densities would not negatively affect the richness of native species, but would indeed affect their abundance.
{"title":"Mammal and bird diversity in a system of protected areas in Argentina","authors":"Y. Ontiveros, F. Cappa, N. Andino, C. Campos, C. Borghi, S. Giannoni","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2099463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2099463","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The main driver of biodiversity loss and subsequent decreases in ecosystem functionality is undeniably human interference, destruction and encroachment. The creation and establishment of protected areas serve as tools for guaranteeing biodiversity conservation. In this study, we examined the diversity of medium- and large-sized mammals and flightless walking birds that are supported by a protected area system, the Ischigualasto–Talampaya system, and its area of influence. We set up 106 camera traps and analysed all data with rank–abundance curves and Hill numbers as a measure of diversity. Species richness was lower in protected areas, unlike in the buffer zone, due to the absence of domestic species. Native species were present all over the area, but with variations in their abundances, showing that the presence of domestic species in low densities would not negatively affect the richness of native species, but would indeed affect their abundance.","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"61 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47898821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-03DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2099462
S. Mihov, B. Margaritova, Veselin Koev
ABSTRACT The downstream migration of young-of-the-year (YoY) of four sturgeon species (Acipenser ruthenus, A. stellatus, A. gueldenstaedtii and Huso huso) was monitored in the Danube at river km 396 in 8 continuous years (2014–2021). A total of 713 YoY specimens were registered for the whole period. The most frequent migrant on an annual basis was A. ruthenus, observed in 6 out of 8 years. The most abundant young sturgeons during the first downstream migration were A. ruthenus with 599 specimens, followed by A. stellatus. For the species H. huso, only 7 specimens were registered for the entire period. The natural hybrids A. ruthenus × A. stellatus were quite frequent. One YoY specimen of A. gueldenstaedtii was registered after 10 years with no detections in the Lower Danube River. The catch per unit effort (CPUE/10 ha) was 0.346 for the whole period for all sturgeon species. This paper suggests a method for calculating the CPUE taking into account the studied area, with the goal of ensuring comparability of monitoring data between the countries of the Lower Danube. Recommendations are also made for better protection of the identified nursery site.
{"title":"Downstream migration of young-of-the-year sturgeons (Acipenseridae) in the Lower Danube River, Bulgaria","authors":"S. Mihov, B. Margaritova, Veselin Koev","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2099462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2099462","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The downstream migration of young-of-the-year (YoY) of four sturgeon species (Acipenser ruthenus, A. stellatus, A. gueldenstaedtii and Huso huso) was monitored in the Danube at river km 396 in 8 continuous years (2014–2021). A total of 713 YoY specimens were registered for the whole period. The most frequent migrant on an annual basis was A. ruthenus, observed in 6 out of 8 years. The most abundant young sturgeons during the first downstream migration were A. ruthenus with 599 specimens, followed by A. stellatus. For the species H. huso, only 7 specimens were registered for the entire period. The natural hybrids A. ruthenus × A. stellatus were quite frequent. One YoY specimen of A. gueldenstaedtii was registered after 10 years with no detections in the Lower Danube River. The catch per unit effort (CPUE/10 ha) was 0.346 for the whole period for all sturgeon species. This paper suggests a method for calculating the CPUE taking into account the studied area, with the goal of ensuring comparability of monitoring data between the countries of the Lower Danube. Recommendations are also made for better protection of the identified nursery site.","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"72 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47949240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2062447
Vanessa Reid
As I write, a Russian invasion into Ukraine is imminent. My father is next door in the kitchen, watching the evening news. I had planned on a swift kitchen entrance and exit: make a cup of tea, gobble down some bara brith (Welsh fruit cake made with black tea) and return to my editing without getting distracted. But tonight’s evening broadcast pulls me in with a kind of unwilling commitment; my eyes are glued to the screen. As – what seem like – hundreds of Russian tanks approach the Ukraine border in a desolate, muddy, barren landscape, I play a series of questions over and over in my mind: ‘where are all the birds? where are the trees and how can there be so many shades of grey in one landscape? how have the earthworms, beetles and bugs fared amongst the bombs, shells, the shrapnel and the deafening artillery?’ My guess is, probably not well. This experience led me to research the impact of warfare on biodiversity: something vastly overlooked and rarely documented, it turns out. According to The Conflict and Environment Observatory (2022), fighting on 24 February, close to Kherson in Ukraine, resulted in fires in the Black Sea Biosphere Reserve. These fires were detectable from space and may have destroyed trees and unique habitats for birds in the largest nature reserve in Ukraine. In times of crises and war we (understandably) put our human needs above anything else, forgetting the toll that war takes on our – already compromised – natural world. Armed conflict affects millions of people across the globe, with one in ten children living in areas impacted by conflict. Whilst the devastation that war brings for humans is well documented, its impact on biodiversity is less so (The Climatarian Blog 2017). According to the United Nation’s Environment Program, for over six decades, armed conflicts have occurred in more than two-thirds of the world’s biodiversity hotspots, thus posing critical threats to conservation efforts. The UN General Assembly declared 6 November the ‘International Day for Preventing the Exploitation of the Environment in War and Armed Conflict’. War preparations alone utilize up to 15 million square kilometres (km) of land, account for 6% of all raw material consumption, and produce as much as 10% of global carbon emissions annually (Bidlack 1996; Biswas 2000; Majeed 2004). Warfare can also impact local species populations and interaction. Following World War II, for example, the brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis) was introduced via former US bases on Guam Island, which led to the extirpation of more than 10 native bird and reptile species. Until now, ecologists have focused on the environmental consequences of specific war-related activities, such as nuclear testing, operational training, battlefield contamination and postwar refugee movements (Homer-Dixon 2001). This does not consider the whole picture. ‘Warfare Ecology’ is an emerging field however, which attempts to document the full impacts of war on ecology, rather th
{"title":"Peace is the only option for a flourishing biodiversity","authors":"Vanessa Reid","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2062447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2062447","url":null,"abstract":"As I write, a Russian invasion into Ukraine is imminent. My father is next door in the kitchen, watching the evening news. I had planned on a swift kitchen entrance and exit: make a cup of tea, gobble down some bara brith (Welsh fruit cake made with black tea) and return to my editing without getting distracted. But tonight’s evening broadcast pulls me in with a kind of unwilling commitment; my eyes are glued to the screen. As – what seem like – hundreds of Russian tanks approach the Ukraine border in a desolate, muddy, barren landscape, I play a series of questions over and over in my mind: ‘where are all the birds? where are the trees and how can there be so many shades of grey in one landscape? how have the earthworms, beetles and bugs fared amongst the bombs, shells, the shrapnel and the deafening artillery?’ My guess is, probably not well. This experience led me to research the impact of warfare on biodiversity: something vastly overlooked and rarely documented, it turns out. According to The Conflict and Environment Observatory (2022), fighting on 24 February, close to Kherson in Ukraine, resulted in fires in the Black Sea Biosphere Reserve. These fires were detectable from space and may have destroyed trees and unique habitats for birds in the largest nature reserve in Ukraine. In times of crises and war we (understandably) put our human needs above anything else, forgetting the toll that war takes on our – already compromised – natural world. Armed conflict affects millions of people across the globe, with one in ten children living in areas impacted by conflict. Whilst the devastation that war brings for humans is well documented, its impact on biodiversity is less so (The Climatarian Blog 2017). According to the United Nation’s Environment Program, for over six decades, armed conflicts have occurred in more than two-thirds of the world’s biodiversity hotspots, thus posing critical threats to conservation efforts. The UN General Assembly declared 6 November the ‘International Day for Preventing the Exploitation of the Environment in War and Armed Conflict’. War preparations alone utilize up to 15 million square kilometres (km) of land, account for 6% of all raw material consumption, and produce as much as 10% of global carbon emissions annually (Bidlack 1996; Biswas 2000; Majeed 2004). Warfare can also impact local species populations and interaction. Following World War II, for example, the brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis) was introduced via former US bases on Guam Island, which led to the extirpation of more than 10 native bird and reptile species. Until now, ecologists have focused on the environmental consequences of specific war-related activities, such as nuclear testing, operational training, battlefield contamination and postwar refugee movements (Homer-Dixon 2001). This does not consider the whole picture. ‘Warfare Ecology’ is an emerging field however, which attempts to document the full impacts of war on ecology, rather th","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42052193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2056768
Vanessa Reid, P. Moore
{"title":"An Ecosinema series of Reflection: A Walk with Water, The Mushroom Speaks and Aya","authors":"Vanessa Reid, P. Moore","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2056768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2056768","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"37 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45609023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2054469
M. Root-Bernstein
{"title":"Habitats of the world: a field guide for birders, naturalists and ecologists","authors":"M. Root-Bernstein","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2054469","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2054469","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"35 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47485242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2058613
S. Mailumo, A. Adepoju, S. Oyewole, G. Onuwa
ABSTRACT This study was carried out to assess crop diversity among smallholder farmers in Kogi State, Northern Nigeria. A multistage sampling technique was used to choose 302 crop farmers, and a well-structured questionnaire was used to generate the data. The information gathered was analysed using the Shannon and Simpson indices and the Poisson and Tobit regression models. The results show that crop production was dominated by male farmers on plots averaging 1.8 ha in size, with an average number of three crops grown per plot. The average values for the Shannon index and Simpson index are 0.34 and 0.85, respectively. The socio-economic factors explaining crop diversity in the area were the farmers’ age, level of education, household size, farm size and income. This study indicates policy strategies are needed that enhance technical knowledge and raise awareness of agro-crop biodiversity management. It also reveals a need for an increase in rural farm household incomes and greater investment in land reforms at both local and national levels in Nigeria. Key policy insights agro-crop diversity ecosystem environmental sustainability polyculture smallholders
{"title":"Assessment of agro-crop biodiversity among smallholder farmers in Kogi State, Northern Nigeria","authors":"S. Mailumo, A. Adepoju, S. Oyewole, G. Onuwa","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2058613","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2058613","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study was carried out to assess crop diversity among smallholder farmers in Kogi State, Northern Nigeria. A multistage sampling technique was used to choose 302 crop farmers, and a well-structured questionnaire was used to generate the data. The information gathered was analysed using the Shannon and Simpson indices and the Poisson and Tobit regression models. The results show that crop production was dominated by male farmers on plots averaging 1.8 ha in size, with an average number of three crops grown per plot. The average values for the Shannon index and Simpson index are 0.34 and 0.85, respectively. The socio-economic factors explaining crop diversity in the area were the farmers’ age, level of education, household size, farm size and income. This study indicates policy strategies are needed that enhance technical knowledge and raise awareness of agro-crop biodiversity management. It also reveals a need for an increase in rural farm household incomes and greater investment in land reforms at both local and national levels in Nigeria. Key policy insights agro-crop diversity ecosystem environmental sustainability polyculture smallholders","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"3 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47728430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2054860
R. Sakurai, H. Kobori, Dai Togane, Lila M. Higgins, Alison N. Young, Keidai Kishimoto, G. Agnello, Simone Cutajar, Y. Ham
ABSTRACT Citizen and community science is an important approach for advancing research, education, and conservation, and currently, various projects are being implemented and trialled worldwide. We conducted surveys of participants in the City Nature Challenge, an international event in which participants engaged in monitoring wildlife and plants in their neighbourhoods. We received responses from 361 participants representing 12 countries including the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Malaysia. There were significant differences in terms of socio-demographic attributes and participants’ perceptions of citizen/community science activities. Regression analysis revealed that the more participants learned about the animals and plants in their areas, the more they self-reported their intention to participate in similar activities in the future in both the United States and Japan. This suggests that managers of citizen/community science projects could tailor the message and contents of the activities to enhance participants’ learning about local biodiversity to increase their continued involvement in future events. Key policy insights In both the United States and Japan, the more participants learned about the animals and plants in their local area through citizen/community science activities, the more they were willing to participate in similar activities in the future. Cross-cultural comparison of participants in citizen/community science activities revealed significant differences in terms of socio-demographic attributes (e.g. participants in Japan and Malaysia were younger than those in the United States and the United Kingdom). Survey results revealed differences in participants’ perceptions of the citizen/community science activities (e.g. participants from Malaysia were more likely to be aware of the threats to animals and plants in their neighbourhood than those in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom).
{"title":"A case study from the City Nature Challenge 2018: international comparison of participants’ responses to citizen science in action","authors":"R. Sakurai, H. Kobori, Dai Togane, Lila M. Higgins, Alison N. Young, Keidai Kishimoto, G. Agnello, Simone Cutajar, Y. Ham","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2054860","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2054860","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Citizen and community science is an important approach for advancing research, education, and conservation, and currently, various projects are being implemented and trialled worldwide. We conducted surveys of participants in the City Nature Challenge, an international event in which participants engaged in monitoring wildlife and plants in their neighbourhoods. We received responses from 361 participants representing 12 countries including the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Malaysia. There were significant differences in terms of socio-demographic attributes and participants’ perceptions of citizen/community science activities. Regression analysis revealed that the more participants learned about the animals and plants in their areas, the more they self-reported their intention to participate in similar activities in the future in both the United States and Japan. This suggests that managers of citizen/community science projects could tailor the message and contents of the activities to enhance participants’ learning about local biodiversity to increase their continued involvement in future events. Key policy insights In both the United States and Japan, the more participants learned about the animals and plants in their local area through citizen/community science activities, the more they were willing to participate in similar activities in the future. Cross-cultural comparison of participants in citizen/community science activities revealed significant differences in terms of socio-demographic attributes (e.g. participants in Japan and Malaysia were younger than those in the United States and the United Kingdom). Survey results revealed differences in participants’ perceptions of the citizen/community science activities (e.g. participants from Malaysia were more likely to be aware of the threats to animals and plants in their neighbourhood than those in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom).","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"21 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47557848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2055645
S. Dorji, R. Rajaratnam, M. Tighe, K. Vernes
ABSTRACT Bhutan has an extensive protected area network and people living inside are integral partners with the conservation landscape. Despite this, little is known on local people’s traditional knowledge, cultural beliefs, and perceptions on wildlife. We investigated drivers of local knowledge, threats and cultural significance of the red panda (Ailurus fulgens) through semi-structured questionnaire surveys (N= 664 participants) on local residents in Jigme Dorji and Phrumsengla National Parks. A conditional inference tree analysis explained that knowledge of the red panda and encounters with the species varied by demography, occupation and locality. Although the majority of respondents were not knowledgeable of the species, residents living within the elevational range of red pandas exhibited greater knowledge. Civil servants, farmers, foresters, park staff, and teachers also had significantly greater knowledge of red pandas than monks, road workers, and students. Informally educated older (≥41 years) respondents placed higher cultural significance on the red panda relative to much younger respondents. Although past studies in Jigme Dorji National Park have identified habitat destruction and fragmentation due to linear infrastructural development – such as the construction of new power transmission lines – as significant anthropogenic threats to the red panda, respondents listed only non-timber forest products collection, forest fires, timber and firewood harvesting, climate change, livestock grazing, and kills by domestic dogs as some of the most prevailing threats to the red panda in our study area. Recognizing and incorporating the intrinsic value of wildlife within the protected area–people framework and utilizing traditional cultural perceptions of threatened species like the red panda, can be a valuable tool in strengthening public support for species conservation. This study further advocates an urgent need for educational programs to promote ecological and cultural values of the red panda in schools and the wider public.
{"title":"Local knowledge, perceptions and the cultural significance of the Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens) in the Himalayan Kingdom of Bhutan","authors":"S. Dorji, R. Rajaratnam, M. Tighe, K. Vernes","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2055645","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2055645","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Bhutan has an extensive protected area network and people living inside are integral partners with the conservation landscape. Despite this, little is known on local people’s traditional knowledge, cultural beliefs, and perceptions on wildlife. We investigated drivers of local knowledge, threats and cultural significance of the red panda (Ailurus fulgens) through semi-structured questionnaire surveys (N= 664 participants) on local residents in Jigme Dorji and Phrumsengla National Parks. A conditional inference tree analysis explained that knowledge of the red panda and encounters with the species varied by demography, occupation and locality. Although the majority of respondents were not knowledgeable of the species, residents living within the elevational range of red pandas exhibited greater knowledge. Civil servants, farmers, foresters, park staff, and teachers also had significantly greater knowledge of red pandas than monks, road workers, and students. Informally educated older (≥41 years) respondents placed higher cultural significance on the red panda relative to much younger respondents. Although past studies in Jigme Dorji National Park have identified habitat destruction and fragmentation due to linear infrastructural development – such as the construction of new power transmission lines – as significant anthropogenic threats to the red panda, respondents listed only non-timber forest products collection, forest fires, timber and firewood harvesting, climate change, livestock grazing, and kills by domestic dogs as some of the most prevailing threats to the red panda in our study area. Recognizing and incorporating the intrinsic value of wildlife within the protected area–people framework and utilizing traditional cultural perceptions of threatened species like the red panda, can be a valuable tool in strengthening public support for species conservation. This study further advocates an urgent need for educational programs to promote ecological and cultural values of the red panda in schools and the wider public.","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"11 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43865649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2022.2055646
N. Dudley, John Anderson, P. Lindsey, S. Stolton
Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays, Cumberland Road, Bristol BS1 6UQ, UK; IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas; Carbon Tanzania UK Ltd, 123 London Road, Sevenoaks, Kent TN13 1BH, UK; Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, 0028, South Africa; Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, Australia; Wildlife Conservation Network, 209 Mississippi Street, San Francisco, USA
均衡研究，47 The Quays，Cumberland Road，Bristol BS1 6UQ，英国；世界自然保护联盟世界保护区委员会；Carbon坦桑尼亚英国有限公司，地址：123 London Road，Sevenoaks，Kent TN13 1BH，UK；南非比勒陀利亚大学动物和昆虫学系哺乳动物研究所，0028；澳大利亚内森4111格里菲斯大学环境期货研究所；美国旧金山密西西比街209号野生动物保护网络
{"title":"Using carbon management as a sustainable strategy for protected and conserved areas","authors":"N. Dudley, John Anderson, P. Lindsey, S. Stolton","doi":"10.1080/14888386.2022.2055646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2055646","url":null,"abstract":"Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays, Cumberland Road, Bristol BS1 6UQ, UK; IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas; Carbon Tanzania UK Ltd, 123 London Road, Sevenoaks, Kent TN13 1BH, UK; Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, 0028, South Africa; Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, Australia; Wildlife Conservation Network, 209 Mississippi Street, San Francisco, USA","PeriodicalId":39411,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity","volume":"23 1","pages":"30 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47141749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：