Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie最新文献

Introduction: Computer tools based on artificial intelligence could aid clinicians in memory clinics by supporting diagnostic decision-making and communicating diagnosis and prognosis. We aimed to identify preferences of end-users, and barriers and facilitators for using computer tools in memory clinics.

Methods: Between July and October 2020, we invited European clinicians (n=109, age 45±10y; 47% female) to participate in an online questionnaire. A second questionnaire was sent to patients (n=50, age 73±8y, 34% female) with subjective cognitive complaints (SCD, n=21), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=16) and dementia (n=13) and care partners (n=46, 65±12y, 54% female).

Results: The vast majority (75%) of all participants positively valued the use of computer tools in memory clinics. Facilitating factors included user-friendliness and increased diagnostic accuracy. Barriers included (doubts relating) reliability and validity of the tool and loss of clinical autonomy. The participants believe that tools should be used in addition to the current working method and not as a replacement.

Discussion: Our results provide an important step in the iterative process of developing computer tools for memory clinics in co-creation with end-users and could guide successful implementation.

In the residential care sector we have witnessed throughout the previous decades a development from a rather paternalistic approach towards a more democratic way of care giving. In many care organizations, however, residents are still rarely involved in the daily routine. In a participatory study on a somatic care unit in the Netherlands, we examined the challenges around the involvement of residents in the care residence. We organized two homogeneous group sessions, with staff and residents separately; reflected on new ways for involving residents; and concluded with a heterogeneous focus group, bringing staff and residents together. Both staff and residents recognized the importance of resident involvement in daily care. However, the difference in perspective on what this should look like created challenges. We found three dilemmas that made the engagement of residents challenging: autonomy versus dependence, personal experiences versus privacy, and happiness versus honesty. We found different ways staff and residents dealt with these dilemmas in practice and defined them in terms of bottlenecks and opportunities. Attention to these dilemmas, pitfalls, and potentials, promotes mutual understanding and ultimately resident involvement in daily care.

The detection and treatment of pain is hampered by cognitive disorders. In this review we discuss the epidemiology of pain in cognitive disorders, and elaborate further on the current state of the art on pain in these populations. We will specifically highlight current gaps and recommendations for the future for the following knowledge domains: 1) Biology and neuropathology,  2) Assessment and evaluation, 3) Treatment and management , and 4) Contextual factors such as the organization and education.  We identify the following knowledge gaps: 1) (Biology): Do pain experience and pain expressions change in different types of cognitive disorders, and how? 2) (Assessment): How to recognize, evaluate and assess pain, in case the self-report of pain is no longer reliable? 3) (Treatment): Which treatment possibilities are effective? How can we organize this in an interdisciplinary way? And how to monitor this? How can we ensure proper implementation of pain assessment and treatment in clinical practice? Specifically with regard to non-pharmacological treatment, how can we communicate observations from different disciplines, family members and clinicians to improve the detection of pain as well as treatment monitoring/evaluation? 4) (Contextual): How can we increase knowledge and skills on pain in cognitive impairment within educational training?

As people worldwide generally live longer, the number of people with dementia is also increasing, a condition for which there is no cure yet. Therefore, there is a growing focus on enhancing the quality of life of people with dementia, as well as a growing need for (new) psychosocial interventions that enhance quality of life. An example of this is Animal assisted therapy (AAT), a goal oriented, planned and structured therapeutic intervention directed and/or delivered by professionals. Equine assisted therapy (EAT) is a specific form of AAT which uses horses or other equines. In our research, the effect of EAT as group therapy was compared to the effect of group therapy without the assistance of animals. Over a period of six weeks, weekly group therapy sessions were conducted by a professional, who is psychologist and equine assisted therapist. In both groups, quality of life was measured before and after the therapy program with the Qualidem and the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease questionnaires. Compared to the group that only participated in group therapy sessions, participation in the EAT program with assistance of a pony led to better results.

Background: delivering medical care of appropriate quality to older people with complex multimorbidity will be challenging in the next few decades and is already under pressure in the long term care setting. Interprofessional collaboration between elderly care physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants can contribute to the sustainability of this care.

Objective: to describe the experience with interprofessional collaboration of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants in long term care and get insight in facilitators and challenges for it.

Methods: focus group interviews were conducted with elderly care physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants from several long term care organisations were conducted, who collaborated as professionals for some time.

Results: interprofessional collaboration was valued positively. Themes emerging from the interviews were: 'scarcity of physicians as reason employing nurse practitioners and physician assistants'; 'unfamiliarity with competencies of nurse practitioners and physician assistant among physicians'; 'trust'; 'added value'; 'absence of protocols/formats' and 'legal and regulation barriers'.

Discussion/conclusion: the emerging themes fit within an existing theoretical model about development of interprofessional collaboration. The development of interprofessional collaboration in long term care fits in the first phases of this model. Important steps for realizing further interprofessional collaboration in daily practice is being aware of and valuing each other's competencies. Also formats that describe competencies and collaboration procedures are considered helpful. Positive for further development is the recent formal support of the three professional organisations together, offering perspective for sustainability of medical care for older people with complex multimorbidity in the coming decades.].

Background: Frailty is a term widely and increasingly used in describing a condition of individuals experiencing multiple problems in one or more domains of human functioning, physical, psychological, and/or social. Frailty is a common condition among older people. Yet, it seems older people barely use this term. This study aims to answer the following research questions: which words are used in the Dutch literature and which words do older people recognize and use in describing ageing and frailty?

Method: The method was twofold, 1) a study of Dutch grey literature and 2) a Delphi procedure. This process involved collecting terms from the literature after which the words were presented to a Delphi panel of older people (>70 years, N=30). The procedure consisted of three rounds in which the panellists were asked whether they recognized or used the terms. The panellists had the opportunity to add terms to the already existing words on the lists.

Results: A total of 187 terms were submitted to the Delphi panel. After analysis, 69 words were retained that were recognized or used by older people. The terms were subdivided into different categories. The category frailty is not included in the final list of terms, due to the panel members' lack of regocnition and use.

Conclusion: This study shows which alternative terms can be used in written and oral communication about themes such as frailty and ageing with older people.

Abstracts 16th National Gerontology conference 2022: A 'decade of healthy ageing' Dream or reality?