Ruba M Alharazi, Raiannah H Alqahtani, Rahaf A Alanazi, Walaa Alharbi, Shmokh M Alshenen, Aisha Alhofaian, Afnan Tunsi, Loujain Sharif
Background/objectives: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT), the formation of a blood clot within a large vein, is one of the most common problems among hospitalized patients. The annual prevalence of DVT is 48 per 1,000,000. Nurses' knowledge significantly affects compliance with VTE risk assessment and prevention. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practices regarding deep venous thrombosis prevention among nurses in Ministry of Health hospitals and King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: This study was conducted in Jeddah using a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design. A sample of 240 registered nurses were conveniently recruited to complete a self-administered online questionnaire. The data were coded and analyzed through SPSS version 24.
Results: The participants had adequate knowledge on the prevention of DVT (75.64 ± 18.88), and the highest level was observed for knowledge about the prevention and prophylaxis of DVT (81.98 ± 45.73%). The practice level of nurses in preventing DVT was 71.92%, with a mean score of 18.7.
Conclusions: There is a significant effect of nurses' level of academic qualifications, working ward, and DVT prevention training on their knowledge and practice of DVT prevention.
背景/目的:深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是大静脉内形成的血块,是住院患者中最常见的问题之一。深静脉血栓的年患病率为48 / 100万。护士的知识显著影响静脉血栓栓塞风险评估和预防的依从性。本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯吉达卫生部医院和阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院(KAUH)护士预防深静脉血栓形成的知识和实践。方法:本研究采用定量、描述性、横断面设计在吉达进行。我们方便地招募了240名注册护士来完成一份自我管理的在线问卷。采用SPSS version 24对数据进行编码和分析。结果:受访对象对DVT预防知识掌握程度较高(75.64±18.88),其中对DVT预防知识掌握程度最高(81.98±45.73%)。护士预防DVT的实践水平为71.92%,平均得分为18.7分。结论:护士学历水平、工作病房、深静脉血栓预防培训对其深静脉血栓预防知识和实践有显著影响。
{"title":"Knowledge and Practices Regarding Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) Prevention Among Nurses in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Ruba M Alharazi, Raiannah H Alqahtani, Rahaf A Alanazi, Walaa Alharbi, Shmokh M Alshenen, Aisha Alhofaian, Afnan Tunsi, Loujain Sharif","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040289","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040289","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Deep venous thrombosis (DVT), the formation of a blood clot within a large vein, is one of the most common problems among hospitalized patients. The annual prevalence of DVT is 48 per 1,000,000. Nurses' knowledge significantly affects compliance with VTE risk assessment and prevention. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practices regarding deep venous thrombosis prevention among nurses in Ministry of Health hospitals and King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in Jeddah using a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design. A sample of 240 registered nurses were conveniently recruited to complete a self-administered online questionnaire. The data were coded and analyzed through SPSS version 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants had adequate knowledge on the prevention of DVT (75.64 ± 18.88), and the highest level was observed for knowledge about the prevention and prophylaxis of DVT (81.98 ± 45.73%). The practice level of nurses in preventing DVT was 71.92%, with a mean score of 18.7.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a significant effect of nurses' level of academic qualifications, working ward, and DVT prevention training on their knowledge and practice of DVT prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3955-3967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677914/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Else Marie Lysfjord, Edith Roth Gjevjon, Siv Skarstein
Aim: To explore the challenges and strategies among new and experienced nursing leaders in mental healthcare; furthermore, to identify factors that support or hinder their leadership roles.
Background: Strong nursing leadership is crucial for the quality of patient care and is associated with higher job security and better patient outcomes. Understanding what factors contribute to effective leadership is essential for the development of future leaders.
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted through interviews with 20 nursing leaders in mental healthcare in Norway, including 10 new leaders (<2 years in the role) and 10 experienced leaders (>10 years in the role). Data were analyzed using a six-step thematic analysis.
Results: New leaders set high standards and faced demanding tasks, which made the role stressful. They experienced uncertainty and self-doubt about their effectiveness and expressed a need for support from mentors or colleagues. Experienced leaders focused on strategic leadership, task prioritization, and employee motivation, emphasizing the importance of being inspirational, patient, and accessible.
Discussion: This study highlights the different challenges faced by new and experienced leaders in mental healthcare. New leaders need support to build confidence and manage the demands of their roles, while experienced leaders benefit from their strategic approach and ability to motivate staff. Conclusions and implications for nursing and/or health policy: The findings suggest that mentoring programs and support networks are essential for developing and motivating nursing leaders. New leaders should receive support to overcome self-doubt and stress associated with their roles. Experienced leaders can, through being mentors, expand their strategic skills and increase own insight and abilities regarding leadership. These insights have significant implications for health policy, which should include resources and programs aimed at supporting leadership development in nursing.
{"title":"Challenges and Strategies in Nursing Leadership: A Qualitative Study on Leaders in Mental Health Care.","authors":"Else Marie Lysfjord, Edith Roth Gjevjon, Siv Skarstein","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040288","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040288","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the challenges and strategies among new and experienced nursing leaders in mental healthcare; furthermore, to identify factors that support or hinder their leadership roles.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Strong nursing leadership is crucial for the quality of patient care and is associated with higher job security and better patient outcomes. Understanding what factors contribute to effective leadership is essential for the development of future leaders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted through interviews with 20 nursing leaders in mental healthcare in Norway, including 10 new leaders (<2 years in the role) and 10 experienced leaders (>10 years in the role). Data were analyzed using a six-step thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>New leaders set high standards and faced demanding tasks, which made the role stressful. They experienced uncertainty and self-doubt about their effectiveness and expressed a need for support from mentors or colleagues. Experienced leaders focused on strategic leadership, task prioritization, and employee motivation, emphasizing the importance of being inspirational, patient, and accessible.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights the different challenges faced by new and experienced leaders in mental healthcare. New leaders need support to build confidence and manage the demands of their roles, while experienced leaders benefit from their strategic approach and ability to motivate staff. Conclusions and implications for nursing and/or health policy: The findings suggest that mentoring programs and support networks are essential for developing and motivating nursing leaders. New leaders should receive support to overcome self-doubt and stress associated with their roles. Experienced leaders can, through being mentors, expand their strategic skills and increase own insight and abilities regarding leadership. These insights have significant implications for health policy, which should include resources and programs aimed at supporting leadership development in nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3943-3954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676536/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rinat Cohen, Yael Sela, Or Catz, Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot
Background: Adverse medical events not only harm patients and families, but also have a significant negative impact on healthcare providers, with the potential to compromise future professional functioning. These "second victims" may need organizational support and rehabilitation to return to functionality.
Objectives: We analyzed the validity of an adapted tool, the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST), on a population in Israel, H-SVEST.
Methods: The H-SVEST was completed by 172 nurse participants working in a variety of patient care settings. All of the participants reported experiencing SVP. The H-SVEST was assessed for content validity, internal consistency, and construct validity with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Results: The CFA, when run on the initial model with 9 factors and 29 items, did not meet criteria for suitability of fit. After removing three items based on their low-factor loadings and the correlation, the model fit significantly improved with acceptable CFI, TLI, RMSEA, and SRMR. The final version included 26 items and 9 factors with Cronbach α values ranging from 0.66 to 0.94.
Conclusion: The H-SVEST demonstrates robust psychometric properties and valuable insights into the second victim experience in the Israeli context. Comparative analysis with other versions highlights potential cultural influences and areas for further investigation. Implementing this tool and developing evidence-based interventions based on its results can significantly improve the well-being and resilience of healthcare providers in Israel and other countries with diverse cultural populations.
{"title":"H-SVEST: Validation and Adaptation of the Hebrew Version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool.","authors":"Rinat Cohen, Yael Sela, Or Catz, Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040286","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse medical events not only harm patients and families, but also have a significant negative impact on healthcare providers, with the potential to compromise future professional functioning. These \"second victims\" may need organizational support and rehabilitation to return to functionality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We analyzed the validity of an adapted tool, the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST), on a population in Israel, H-SVEST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The H-SVEST was completed by 172 nurse participants working in a variety of patient care settings. All of the participants reported experiencing SVP. The H-SVEST was assessed for content validity, internal consistency, and construct validity with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CFA, when run on the initial model with 9 factors and 29 items, did not meet criteria for suitability of fit. After removing three items based on their low-factor loadings and the correlation, the model fit significantly improved with acceptable CFI, TLI, RMSEA, and SRMR. The final version included 26 items and 9 factors with Cronbach α values ranging from 0.66 to 0.94.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The H-SVEST demonstrates robust psychometric properties and valuable insights into the second victim experience in the Israeli context. Comparative analysis with other versions highlights potential cultural influences and areas for further investigation. Implementing this tool and developing evidence-based interventions based on its results can significantly improve the well-being and resilience of healthcare providers in Israel and other countries with diverse cultural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3919-3932"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676138/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michela Luciani, Michela Barisone, Marco Bentivegna, Antonietta Fioremisto, Giulia Galeazzi, Marco Alfonso La Monica, Alessandra Musci, Davide Ausili, Alberto Dal Molin
Aim: The aim of this study was to explore Italian nurses' publications from 1980 to 2020. Background/Objectives: Several studies have been conducted internationally to assess nursing research output. In Italy, there are some older studies, but a comprehensive analysis of the Italian nursing scientific production after 2010 is needed. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted through a retrospective descriptive study. All articles (n = 3423) published by Italian nurses (n = 2170) and indexed in Scopus were included, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Publication trends show a steady growth, with an increase in publications in journals with higher IFs. Most publications were focused on clinical research and used quantitative methods (n = 2473 articles (86.71%)). The most frequently conducted quantitative studies were observational studies (52.91%), followed by experimental studies (12.5%), instrumental studies (6.72%), and other methodologies (0.15%). Qualitative studies accounted for n = 318 articles (11.15%), and mixed-method studies accounted for n = 61 articles (2.14%). Conclusions: The overall improvement in Italian nursing research is due to the increase in the number of nurses with PhDs and academics in the country. More funding and nursing research positions are needed to further improve research.
{"title":"Italian Nursing Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1980 to 2020.","authors":"Michela Luciani, Michela Barisone, Marco Bentivegna, Antonietta Fioremisto, Giulia Galeazzi, Marco Alfonso La Monica, Alessandra Musci, Davide Ausili, Alberto Dal Molin","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040287","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to explore Italian nurses' publications from 1980 to 2020. <b>Background/Objectives:</b> Several studies have been conducted internationally to assess nursing research output. In Italy, there are some older studies, but a comprehensive analysis of the Italian nursing scientific production after 2010 is needed. <b>Methods:</b> A bibliometric analysis was conducted through a retrospective descriptive study. All articles (n = 3423) published by Italian nurses (n = 2170) and indexed in Scopus were included, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. <b>Results</b>: Publication trends show a steady growth, with an increase in publications in journals with higher IFs. Most publications were focused on clinical research and used quantitative methods (n = 2473 articles (86.71%)). The most frequently conducted quantitative studies were observational studies (52.91%), followed by experimental studies (12.5%), instrumental studies (6.72%), and other methodologies (0.15%). Qualitative studies accounted for n = 318 articles (11.15%), and mixed-method studies accounted for n = 61 articles (2.14%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The overall improvement in Italian nursing research is due to the increase in the number of nurses with PhDs and academics in the country. More funding and nursing research positions are needed to further improve research.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3933-3942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679739/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/objectives: This study investigates the challenges faced by family caregivers of individuals with dementia in Japan, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 500 family caregivers of patients with dementia.
Results: 56.4% of caregivers reported an increased caregiving burden, primarily due to extended caregiving hours, reduced access to public services, and restrictions on social interactions. This study found a strong preference for formal support, with 75.4% of caregivers desiring access to more comprehensive services. However, 19.4% of dementia patients were not utilizing any public services, largely due to a mismatch between available services and caregivers' actual needs, as well as societal resistance to inviting formal support into the home. Informal support systems, such as dementia family groups and cafes, were well-known, but participation rates remained low (5.4% and 5.8%, respectively), despite the potential benefits for reducing stress and providing emotional support. Key barriers included privacy concerns, reluctance to engage, and logistical challenges such as inconvenient access and time constraints.
Conclusions: To mitigate the above challenges, this study recommends expanding telemedicine and remote support services, improving awareness of available resources, and offering flexible, tailored solutions to meet diverse caregiving needs. Additionally, increasing financial support, enhancing public recognition of caregiver roles, and providing psychological counseling and stress management programs are essential to alleviating both the emotional and economic burdens placed on family caregivers during the pandemic.
{"title":"Challenges Faced by Family Caregivers of Individuals Living with Dementia in Japan During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Toshiko Tsuyuki, Takeshi Asai, Erina Kurosaki, Atsushi Nakamura, Kaori Kishi, Fumi Takeda","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040285","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study investigates the challenges faced by family caregivers of individuals with dementia in Japan, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 500 family caregivers of patients with dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56.4% of caregivers reported an increased caregiving burden, primarily due to extended caregiving hours, reduced access to public services, and restrictions on social interactions. This study found a strong preference for formal support, with 75.4% of caregivers desiring access to more comprehensive services. However, 19.4% of dementia patients were not utilizing any public services, largely due to a mismatch between available services and caregivers' actual needs, as well as societal resistance to inviting formal support into the home. Informal support systems, such as dementia family groups and cafes, were well-known, but participation rates remained low (5.4% and 5.8%, respectively), despite the potential benefits for reducing stress and providing emotional support. Key barriers included privacy concerns, reluctance to engage, and logistical challenges such as inconvenient access and time constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To mitigate the above challenges, this study recommends expanding telemedicine and remote support services, improving awareness of available resources, and offering flexible, tailored solutions to meet diverse caregiving needs. Additionally, increasing financial support, enhancing public recognition of caregiver roles, and providing psychological counseling and stress management programs are essential to alleviating both the emotional and economic burdens placed on family caregivers during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3907-3918"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676139/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bruna Raquel Fonseca, Maura Filipa Silva, Rogério Ferrinho Ferreira, Sofia Cabecinhas de Sá, Teresa Dionísio Mestre, Marta Sofia Catarino
(1) Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are caused by the proliferation of pathogenic microorganisms, and they are the second most common hospital-acquired infections, with catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs) accounting for about 40% of these nosocomial infections. This review aims to identify the impact of technology on preventing infections in patients with urinary catheters; (2) Methods: The search was conducted in April 2024 through the EBSCOhost platform, with access to the American Search Complete, CINHAL Ultimate, Medline databases, and through the Scopus database; (3) Results: In total were included eight articles in this review. Technology interventions can significantly reduce the incidence of CAUTIs, decrease the duration of catheter use, improve diagnosis, and enhance patient safety; (4) Conclusions: Technological advancements show significant benefits in reducing infection rates and improving patient outcomes, like shorter hospital stays and comfort. Multidisciplinary approaches and educational strategies are essential to maximize these benefits.
{"title":"The Use of Technology in the Prevention of Infections Associated with Urinary Catheterization.","authors":"Bruna Raquel Fonseca, Maura Filipa Silva, Rogério Ferrinho Ferreira, Sofia Cabecinhas de Sá, Teresa Dionísio Mestre, Marta Sofia Catarino","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040284","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are caused by the proliferation of pathogenic microorganisms, and they are the second most common hospital-acquired infections, with catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs) accounting for about 40% of these nosocomial infections. This review aims to identify the impact of technology on preventing infections in patients with urinary catheters; (2) Methods: The search was conducted in April 2024 through the EBSCOhost platform, with access to the American Search Complete, CINHAL Ultimate, Medline databases, and through the Scopus database; (3) Results: In total were included eight articles in this review. Technology interventions can significantly reduce the incidence of CAUTIs, decrease the duration of catheter use, improve diagnosis, and enhance patient safety; (4) Conclusions: Technological advancements show significant benefits in reducing infection rates and improving patient outcomes, like shorter hospital stays and comfort. Multidisciplinary approaches and educational strategies are essential to maximize these benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3895-3906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677464/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/Objectives: People with a severe mental illness die much earlier than the rest of the population from a preventable physical illness. Annual health checks are a way of assessing the person to then offer the appropriate interventions. Integrated Care Northampton, England used the long-term plan baseline funding allocated to them from the government department that commissions primary care services, to implement a local enhanced service. Their aim was to provide a person-centred physical health check that people with severe mental illness feel comfortable, confident, and able to engage with. Methods: Wellbeing Organisation Research Training Hub Northampton were commissioned by Integrated Care Northampton to provide training, support, and evaluate the locally enhanced service. Training was provided by training trainers who then offered one-to-one support to those delivering health checks in practice. Providers of the health checks could also access individual support from Wellbeing Organisation Research Training Hub staff. Patient data were collected via a template that is part of usual practice. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the education of staff, the delivery of health checks, and the impact on people with severe mental illness. Results: Training was well received but most of the trainers did not continue in their role. The project was successful in highlighting the physical health needs of people with severe mental illness and monitoring in primary care increased. Though methods were put in place to evaluate the delivery of health checks and their impact on people with severe mental illness, these were not utilised by the service. Conclusions: This paper emphasises how difficult it is to implement a new service and evaluate it successfully. Future projects should prioritise measuring the quality of the service.
{"title":"Providing Physical Health Checks for People with Severe Mental Illness in Primary Care in England: An Evaluation of a Locally Enhanced Service.","authors":"Sheila Hardy","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040282","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040282","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: People with a severe mental illness die much earlier than the rest of the population from a preventable physical illness. Annual health checks are a way of assessing the person to then offer the appropriate interventions. Integrated Care Northampton, England used the long-term plan baseline funding allocated to them from the government department that commissions primary care services, to implement a local enhanced service. Their aim was to provide a person-centred physical health check that people with severe mental illness feel comfortable, confident, and able to engage with. <b>Methods</b>: Wellbeing Organisation Research Training Hub Northampton were commissioned by Integrated Care Northampton to provide training, support, and evaluate the locally enhanced service. Training was provided by training trainers who then offered one-to-one support to those delivering health checks in practice. Providers of the health checks could also access individual support from Wellbeing Organisation Research Training Hub staff. Patient data were collected via a template that is part of usual practice. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the education of staff, the delivery of health checks, and the impact on people with severe mental illness. <b>Results</b>: Training was well received but most of the trainers did not continue in their role. The project was successful in highlighting the physical health needs of people with severe mental illness and monitoring in primary care increased. Though methods were put in place to evaluate the delivery of health checks and their impact on people with severe mental illness, these were not utilised by the service. <b>Conclusions</b>: This paper emphasises how difficult it is to implement a new service and evaluate it successfully. Future projects should prioritise measuring the quality of the service.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3864-3877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679364/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Individualizing care is the essence of nursing, and its benefits have been extensively proven in older people. The changes arisen during the COVID-19 pandemic may have affected it. The aim of this study is to analyze the changes produced in the perceptions about the individualization of care, quality of life, and care environment of elderly people living in long-term care centers before and after the pandemic. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out. For data collection, the Individualized Care Scale-patient, the EuroQol-5D scale, and a reduced version of the Sheffield Care Environment Assessment Matrix test were used, and a statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 177 people participated in the study, with 87 pre-COVID-19 and 90 post-COVID-19, 62.7% of whom were women. The average age was 83.3 years. General activities of the individualized care obtained medians of 4, 2.5, and 3 (out of 5) in clinical situation, personal life situation, and decisional control dimensions, respectively, and no substantial change was observed pre- and post-pandemic. Nevertheless, 10 out of 17 items related with the maintenance of individuality in the last shift were higher rated after COVID-19. They are mainly related to the feelings and needs of care, daily life activities, and the expression of opinions. The median of all items was 3 despite the improvement observed after the pandemic. Residents scored an average of 6.47 points (out of 10) in the life quality self-evaluation and were satisfied with the care environment (94%). Patients with higher life quality and adherence to their environment perceived better care. Conclusions: Although slight improvements were observed in the individualized care after the pandemic, the obtained results revealed that there is still room for improvement. Particularly, it is necessary to develop strategies aimed at motivating the family participation or providing individual spaces in the residences.
{"title":"Individualized Care in Nursing Homes Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Aurora García-Camacha Gutiérrez, Irene García-Camacha Gutiérrez, Riitta Suhonen, Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040283","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040283","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Individualizing care is the essence of nursing, and its benefits have been extensively proven in older people. The changes arisen during the COVID-19 pandemic may have affected it. The aim of this study is to analyze the changes produced in the perceptions about the individualization of care, quality of life, and care environment of elderly people living in long-term care centers before and after the pandemic. <b>Methods</b>: A prospective cross-sectional observational study was carried out. For data collection, the Individualized Care Scale-patient, the EuroQol-5D scale, and a reduced version of the Sheffield Care Environment Assessment Matrix test were used, and a statistical analysis was performed. <b>Results</b>: A total of 177 people participated in the study, with 87 pre-COVID-19 and 90 post-COVID-19, 62.7% of whom were women. The average age was 83.3 years. General activities of the individualized care obtained medians of 4, 2.5, and 3 (out of 5) in clinical situation, personal life situation, and decisional control dimensions, respectively, and no substantial change was observed pre- and post-pandemic. Nevertheless, 10 out of 17 items related with the maintenance of individuality in the last shift were higher rated after COVID-19. They are mainly related to the feelings and needs of care, daily life activities, and the expression of opinions. The median of all items was 3 despite the improvement observed after the pandemic. Residents scored an average of 6.47 points (out of 10) in the life quality self-evaluation and were satisfied with the care environment (94%). Patients with higher life quality and adherence to their environment perceived better care. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although slight improvements were observed in the individualized care after the pandemic, the obtained results revealed that there is still room for improvement. Particularly, it is necessary to develop strategies aimed at motivating the family participation or providing individual spaces in the residences.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3878-3894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677725/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Loneliness can occur at any age, but it is more prevalent among older adults due to the associated risk factors. Various interventions exist to improve this situation, but little is known about their long-term effects. Our aims were to determine if these interventions have long-lasting effects and for how long they can be sustained. Additionally, we aimed to analyze if the interventions carried out by volunteers affected the outcomes regarding loneliness and psychological impact.
Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching the literature in the MEDLINE PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases for interventions focused on the lonely population. The inclusion criteria for this review were the assessment of loneliness using a validated tool, and loneliness being the primary or secondary outcome. The CASPe checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in the selected studies, and the PRISMA-ScR recommendations were followed to present and synthesize the results.
Results: Thirty articles were included. The interventions identified were classified into five categories: psychosocial, technological, health promotion, physical exercise, and multicomponent interventions. Loneliness improved in 24 studies during the post-intervention analysis. Social connectivity and depressive symptoms also improved in most interventions. Long-term follow-ups were conducted with positive results in a total of 16 interventions. Depressive symptoms and social connectivity were also improved. Eight of the interventions were carried out by volunteers and showed good results regarding loneliness.
Conclusions: The results obtained in this work suggested that multidisciplinary interventions can reduce loneliness, but more controlled clinical studies are needed.
背景:孤独可以发生在任何年龄,但由于相关的风险因素,它在老年人中更为普遍。有多种干预措施可以改善这种状况,但对其长期效果知之甚少。我们的目的是确定这些干预措施是否具有持久的效果,以及它们可以持续多久。此外,我们旨在分析志愿者进行的干预是否会影响孤独感和心理影响的结果。方法:通过检索MEDLINE PubMed、SCOPUS、Web of Science、PsycINFO和Web of Science数据库的文献进行系统综述,以获得针对孤独人群的干预措施。本综述的纳入标准是使用经过验证的工具评估孤独感,并且孤独感是主要或次要结局。使用CASPe检查表来评估所选研究的偏倚风险,并遵循PRISMA-ScR建议来呈现和综合结果。结果:共纳入30篇文章。已确定的干预措施分为五类:心理社会、技术、健康促进、体育锻炼和多成分干预。在干预后的分析中,有24项研究的孤独感有所改善。在大多数干预措施中,社会联系和抑郁症状也有所改善。在16项干预措施中进行了长期随访,取得了积极的结果。抑郁症状和社会联系也有所改善。其中八项干预是由志愿者进行的,在孤独感方面显示出良好的效果。结论:本研究结果提示多学科干预可以减少孤独感,但还需要更多的临床对照研究。
{"title":"The Long-Lasting Effect of Multidisciplinary Interventions for Emotional and Social Loneliness in Older Community-Dwelling Individuals: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Georgiana Zaharia, Vanessa Ibáñez-Del Valle, Omar Cauli, Silvia Corchón","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040281","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040281","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness can occur at any age, but it is more prevalent among older adults due to the associated risk factors. Various interventions exist to improve this situation, but little is known about their long-term effects. Our aims were to determine if these interventions have long-lasting effects and for how long they can be sustained. Additionally, we aimed to analyze if the interventions carried out by volunteers affected the outcomes regarding loneliness and psychological impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed by searching the literature in the MEDLINE PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases for interventions focused on the lonely population. The inclusion criteria for this review were the assessment of loneliness using a validated tool, and loneliness being the primary or secondary outcome. The CASPe checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in the selected studies, and the PRISMA-ScR recommendations were followed to present and synthesize the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty articles were included. The interventions identified were classified into five categories: psychosocial, technological, health promotion, physical exercise, and multicomponent interventions. Loneliness improved in 24 studies during the post-intervention analysis. Social connectivity and depressive symptoms also improved in most interventions. Long-term follow-ups were conducted with positive results in a total of 16 interventions. Depressive symptoms and social connectivity were also improved. Eight of the interventions were carried out by volunteers and showed good results regarding loneliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results obtained in this work suggested that multidisciplinary interventions can reduce loneliness, but more controlled clinical studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3847-3863"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676195/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bushra Yunis, Paloma Echevarría-Pérez, Juan Jose Hernandez Morante, Isabel Morales-Moreno
Background/objectives: Previous studies have shown that primary care (PC) professionals have a low knowledge about the management of patients with type 2 diabetes, despite being one of the most common chronic diseases. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of an educational program for health professionals on the metabolic control of their patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: This work follows a quasi-experimental longitudinal design following a double perspective. First, an educational intervention was conducted on primary care health professionals. Previous diabetes knowledge was evaluated on 157 PC health professionals. Those with lower knowledge scores (<3.5 out of 7) were allocated to the intervention group. An 8-week advanced education program was conducted on 77 PC health professionals. Self-efficacy and quality of care were evaluated. Second, a prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate changes in metabolic parameters in their patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 4099 patients with type 2 diabetes attending PC services were divided depending on the formation of health professionals. Biochemical and other clinical parameters were determined at baseline and after 12 months; the study was allocated in the Primary Health Centers of Meuhedet North District (Israel), from January 2022 to June 2023. Changes from the baseline were compared using ANOVA. Additionally, a mixed-effect model was conducted to capture variability within primary care staff and between groups of patients.
Results: The education program significantly improved health staff knowledge (p < 0.001) and all dimensions of self-efficacy (p < 0.001 in all cases). These improvements were mirrored in patients' outcomes, since those managed by health professionals attending the advanced practice education showed, after 6 months, better glucose (p < 0.001), HbA1c (p < 0.001), and eGFR (p = 0.006) levels.
Conclusions: The advanced practice education program oriented to PC professionals was able to significantly improve their self-efficacy and perceived quality of care, which induced a significant effect on metabolic markers of patients with type 2 diabetes. Overall, the data reinforce the usefulness of advanced education programs, especially in chronic complex diseases like type 2 diabetes.
{"title":"Increasing Self-Efficacy for the Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Through an Advanced Practice Education Program for Primary Care Professionals.","authors":"Bushra Yunis, Paloma Echevarría-Pérez, Juan Jose Hernandez Morante, Isabel Morales-Moreno","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040280","DOIUrl":"10.3390/nursrep14040280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Previous studies have shown that primary care (PC) professionals have a low knowledge about the management of patients with type 2 diabetes, despite being one of the most common chronic diseases. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of an educational program for health professionals on the metabolic control of their patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work follows a quasi-experimental longitudinal design following a double perspective. First, an educational intervention was conducted on primary care health professionals. Previous diabetes knowledge was evaluated on 157 PC health professionals. Those with lower knowledge scores (<3.5 out of 7) were allocated to the intervention group. An 8-week advanced education program was conducted on 77 PC health professionals. Self-efficacy and quality of care were evaluated. Second, a prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate changes in metabolic parameters in their patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 4099 patients with type 2 diabetes attending PC services were divided depending on the formation of health professionals. Biochemical and other clinical parameters were determined at baseline and after 12 months; the study was allocated in the Primary Health Centers of Meuhedet North District (Israel), from January 2022 to June 2023. Changes from the baseline were compared using ANOVA. Additionally, a mixed-effect model was conducted to capture variability within primary care staff and between groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The education program significantly improved health staff knowledge (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and all dimensions of self-efficacy (<i>p</i> < 0.001 in all cases). These improvements were mirrored in patients' outcomes, since those managed by health professionals attending the advanced practice education showed, after 6 months, better glucose (<i>p</i> < 0.001), HbA1c (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and eGFR (<i>p</i> = 0.006) levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The advanced practice education program oriented to PC professionals was able to significantly improve their self-efficacy and perceived quality of care, which induced a significant effect on metabolic markers of patients with type 2 diabetes. Overall, the data reinforce the usefulness of advanced education programs, especially in chronic complex diseases like type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 4","pages":"3830-3846"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676394/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}