Pub Date : 2006-11-01DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017919
Charles H. Lohr
{"title":"RAIMUNDUS LULLUS UND DIE SCHOLASTIK","authors":"Charles H. Lohr","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017919","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"197 1","pages":"335-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91353336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-11-01DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017914
M. Mowbray
{"title":"The De aeternitate mundi of Boethius of Dacia and the Paris condemnation of 1277","authors":"M. Mowbray","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017914","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"43 1","pages":"201-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76291232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-11-01DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017917
J. Aertsen
{"title":"'TRANSCENDENS' IM MITTELALTER : DAS JENSEITIGE UND DAS GEMEINSAME","authors":"J. Aertsen","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017917","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017917","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"44 1","pages":"291-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88544577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-11-01DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017920
M. Hoenen
{"title":"NOMINALISMUS ALS UNIVERSITÄRE SPEKULATIONSKONTROLLE","authors":"M. Hoenen","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.73.2.2017920","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"40 1","pages":"349-374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88791062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-06-01DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014930
John Wei
The doctrine of divine simplicity as developed by Patristic writers suggests that the divine essence is identical to actions of the undivided divine nature, such as knowing and willing. However, natures or essences, on the one hand, and actions, on the other, appear to be fundamentally different. The first belongs to what God is in and of Himself, while the second belongs to the category of the Godhead’s undivided action. Can operations of the divine essence, whether in se or ad extra, be identical to the divine essence, to God’s very being? If so, how? And if not, how are they to be understood? This article examines the way in which four scholastic theologians from the second half of the twelfth century - Peter Lombard, Roland of Bologna, Alan of Lille, and Peter of Poitiers - answer these questions. In doing so, it illuminates the origins of theological techniques that persist and continue to play an important role in fourteenth- century discussions of predestination by theologians such as Peter Auriol, while also demonstrating the inadequacies of describing theologians from the second half of the twelfth century in terms of schools.
{"title":"Divine Simplicity and Predestination in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century","authors":"John Wei","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014930","url":null,"abstract":"The doctrine of divine simplicity as developed by Patristic writers suggests that the divine essence is identical to actions of the undivided divine nature, such as knowing and willing. However, natures or essences, on the one hand, and actions, on the other, appear to be fundamentally different. The first belongs to what God is in and of Himself, while the second belongs to the category of the Godhead’s undivided action. Can operations of the divine essence, whether in se or ad extra, be identical to the divine essence, to God’s very being? If so, how? And if not, how are they to be understood? This article examines the way in which four scholastic theologians from the second half of the twelfth century - Peter Lombard, Roland of Bologna, Alan of Lille, and Peter of Poitiers - answer these questions. In doing so, it illuminates the origins of theological techniques that persist and continue to play an important role in fourteenth- century discussions of predestination by theologians such as Peter Auriol, while also demonstrating the inadequacies of describing theologians from the second half of the twelfth century in terms of schools.","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"29 1","pages":"37-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74764439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-06-01DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014933
L. Hödl
{"title":"Der Trinitätstheologische Relationssatz des Boethius In der Schule des Thomas von Aquin im 14. Jahrhundert","authors":"L. Hödl","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014933","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014933","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"105 1","pages":"175-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80108945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-06-01DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014929
P. Healy
This article deals with the exegetical method of Hugh of Flavigny, a Lotharingian monk who composed a world chronicle between c. 1085 and 1102. The second half of Hugh’s work was composed in defence of Pope Gregory VII (1073-85), whose programme of reform and death in exile was the object of much contemporary debate. In his defence of Gregory’s pontificate, Hugh - like many pro-papal writers - had recourse to a polemical interpretation of Scripture that had three main purposes: to justify the legitimacy of Pope Gregory’s measures against King Henry IV of Germany (1056-1106), to prophesise future divine retribution against the apparently victorious party of Henry IV, and to promise future rewards for the Gregorian ‘martyrs’ who had suffered for the cause of righteousness. Hugh’s polemical interpretation of the Bible was very similar in method and intent to others contemporary and near-contemporary supporters of Gregory VII, such as Bernhard of Hildesheim, Manegold of Lautenbach and Bonizo of Sutri. However, in addition to sharing some of the typical concerns and methods of pro-papal polemic, Hugh’s exegesis demonstrates considerable originality, especially when dealing with the reconciliation of apparently contradictory texts and when explaining the process of spiritual regeneration.
{"title":"The polemical use of scripture in the chronicle of Hugh of Flavigny","authors":"P. Healy","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014929","url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the exegetical method of Hugh of Flavigny, a Lotharingian monk who composed a world chronicle between c. 1085 and 1102. The second half of Hugh’s work was composed in defence of Pope Gregory VII (1073-85), whose programme of reform and death in exile was the object of much contemporary debate. In his defence of Gregory’s pontificate, Hugh - like many pro-papal writers - had recourse to a polemical interpretation of Scripture that had three main purposes: to justify the legitimacy of Pope Gregory’s measures against King Henry IV of Germany (1056-1106), to prophesise future divine retribution against the apparently victorious party of Henry IV, and to promise future rewards for the Gregorian ‘martyrs’ who had suffered for the cause of righteousness. Hugh’s polemical interpretation of the Bible was very similar in method and intent to others contemporary and near-contemporary supporters of Gregory VII, such as Bernhard of Hildesheim, Manegold of Lautenbach and Bonizo of Sutri. However, in addition to sharing some of the typical concerns and methods of pro-papal polemic, Hugh’s exegesis demonstrates considerable originality, especially when dealing with the reconciliation of apparently contradictory texts and when explaining the process of spiritual regeneration.","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"73 1","pages":"1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78719038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2006-06-01DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014932
M. Morard
L’article edite la Collatio super Sacram Scripturam in generali d’Armand de Belvezer († apres 1348), contenue dans le ms. Paris, BnF lat 2584. Il propose de la considerer comme la reportation (ou peut-etre le brouillon preparatoire) d’une partie de l’inceptio d’un bachelier sentenciaire, conforme a ce que prescriront les Statuts de l’Universite de Bologne en 1366. Cette lecture conduit a reviser la biographie d’Armand de Belvezer et a preciser, grâce a une etude codicologique approfondie, l’origine du manuscrit, copie entre 1333-1342 pour le successeur d’Armand comme maitre du Sacre Palais, Arnaud de St-Michel. Par son contenu, la Collatio est a verser au dossier des theories du savoir theologique entre 1303 et 1325 et fait etat d’un pre-thomisme serein, teinte d’influences aristoteliciennes et neo-platoniciennes. Elle associe Ecriture sainte et theologie dans un meme eloge, parfaitement coherent mais desservi par un texte corrompu et difficile.
这篇文章编辑了阿尔芒·德·贝尔维泽将军(1348年后†)的《超级圣书》，包含在巴黎女士，BnF lat 2584。他建议将其视为一份报告(或者可能是一份预备草案)，根据1366年博洛尼亚大学的章程，这是一份宣判的学士学位论文的一部分。这一阅读导致了对阿尔芒·德·贝尔维泽传记的修订，并通过深入的编纂学研究，澄清了手稿的来源，手稿是在1333年至1342年间为阿尔芒的继任者、神圣宫殿的主人阿尔诺·德·圣米歇尔编写的。就其内容而言，《协约》属于1303年至1325年间神学知识理论的档案，是一种宁静的前托马斯主义，带有亚里士多德和新柏拉图主义的影响。它将圣经和神学结合在一个赞美中，完全一致，但被一个腐败和困难的文本所破坏。
{"title":"Une certaine idée de la science sacrée : La Collatio Super Sacram Scripturam d'Armand de Belvézer, O. P","authors":"M. Morard","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.73.1.2014932","url":null,"abstract":"L’article edite la Collatio super Sacram Scripturam in generali d’Armand de Belvezer († apres 1348), contenue dans le ms. Paris, BnF lat 2584. Il propose de la considerer comme la reportation (ou peut-etre le brouillon preparatoire) d’une partie de l’inceptio d’un bachelier sentenciaire, conforme a ce que prescriront les Statuts de l’Universite de Bologne en 1366. Cette lecture conduit a reviser la biographie d’Armand de Belvezer et a preciser, grâce a une etude codicologique approfondie, l’origine du manuscrit, copie entre 1333-1342 pour le successeur d’Armand comme maitre du Sacre Palais, Arnaud de St-Michel. Par son contenu, la Collatio est a verser au dossier des theories du savoir theologique entre 1303 et 1325 et fait etat d’un pre-thomisme serein, teinte d’influences aristoteliciennes et neo-platoniciennes. Elle associe Ecriture sainte et theologie dans un meme eloge, parfaitement coherent mais desservi par un texte corrompu et difficile.","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"30 1","pages":"99-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91296635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-12-08DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.72.2.2004137
S. Donati
{"title":"The anonymous commentary on the physics in Erfurt, Cod. Amplon. Q. 312 and Richard Rufus of Cornwall","authors":"S. Donati","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.72.2.2004137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.72.2.2004137","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":"86 1","pages":"232-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2005-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89595371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：