Pub Date : 2021-01-02DOI: 10.1080/1547402x.2021.1923214
Huaiyu Chen
{"title":"The Way of the Barbarians: Redrawing Ethnic Boundaries in Tang and Song China","authors":"Huaiyu Chen","doi":"10.1080/1547402x.2021.1923214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402x.2021.1923214","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"93 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402x.2021.1923214","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42126057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-02DOI: 10.1080/1547402X.2021.1924928
M. Bullock, Hanchao Lu
Few scholars (and perhaps historians in particular) are capable of conducting in-depth research while simultaneously playing a major leadership role in academic organizations and institutions. Mary Brown Bullock is one of those rare academics who has done precisely that. In her half century career as a historian of modern China, Professor Bullock has been a leading scholar of the history of US–China relations in the realm of philanthropy, medicine, education and, most of all, the Rockefeller Foundation in China. She has taught courses on these subject at Johns Hopkins University and Emory University. At the same time, Professor Bullock has presided over several national organizations that have played key roles in promoting China and Asia-related research in the United States and US– China scholarly exchange. Being a “scholar-official,” if I may use an old expression apropos of the Chinese civil service examination system, is by no means a small achievement, especially in an environment where women were often excluded from leadership positions. For decades following her graduate studies at Stanford, Bullock immersed herself in research on the Peking UnionMedical College (PUMC, founded in 1906) and the Rockefeller Foundation’s activities in China in the early twentieth century, which helped the country establish a modern system of education and medical science. These activities can be seen as part of America’s “intellectual investment” in modern China, a subject that, given the legacy of Western imperialism, tends to be controversial. But it is undeniable that the American presence in education, medicine, and public health, among other things, in war-ridden China served the people. By the early twenty-first century, Bullock became a key figure in an endeavor that bears similarities to what the Rockefeller Foundation did a century ago: to established a Chinese-American partnership between Duke University and Wuhan University to develop a 200-acre campus in Kunshan, a town in Jiangsu about forty miles northwest of Shanghai. As the first vice-chancellor of Duke Kunshan The Chinese Historical Review, 28. 1, 68–82, May 2021
很少有学者（尤其是历史学家）能够进行深入研究，同时在学术组织和机构中发挥重要领导作用。玛丽·布朗·布洛克（Mary Brown Bullock）是极少数做到这一点的学者之一。布洛克教授在其半个世纪的现代中国历史学家生涯中，一直是慈善、医学、教育领域的美中关系史的领军学者，尤其是中国洛克菲勒基金会。她曾在约翰霍普金斯大学和埃默里大学教授这些课程。同时，布洛克教授主持了多个国家组织，这些组织在促进美国的中国和亚洲相关研究以及美中学术交流方面发挥了关键作用。作为一名“学者型官员”，如果我可以用一句中国公务员考试制度的老话来形容的话，这绝非一项小成就，尤其是在女性经常被排除在领导职位之外的环境中。布洛克在斯坦福大学攻读研究生后的几十年里，一直致力于研究北京大学医学院（成立于1906年）和洛克菲勒基金会在20世纪初在中国的活动，这些活动帮助中国建立了现代教育和医学体系。这些活动可以被视为美国对现代中国“智力投资”的一部分，考虑到西方帝国主义的遗产，这个主题往往会引起争议。但不可否认的是，在战乱的中国，美国在教育、医学和公共卫生等方面的存在为人民服务。到了21世纪初，布洛克成为了一个与洛克菲勒基金会一个世纪前所做的类似努力的关键人物：杜克大学和武汉大学建立了中美合作伙伴关系，在江苏昆山开发了一个200英亩的校园，昆山位于上海西北约40英里处。作为昆山公爵的第一任副总理，《中国历史评论》，28岁。2021年5月1日，68–82
{"title":"A Perpetual Search: Mary Brown Bullock and American Philanthropy and Education in China","authors":"M. Bullock, Hanchao Lu","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2021.1924928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2021.1924928","url":null,"abstract":"Few scholars (and perhaps historians in particular) are capable of conducting in-depth research while simultaneously playing a major leadership role in academic organizations and institutions. Mary Brown Bullock is one of those rare academics who has done precisely that. In her half century career as a historian of modern China, Professor Bullock has been a leading scholar of the history of US–China relations in the realm of philanthropy, medicine, education and, most of all, the Rockefeller Foundation in China. She has taught courses on these subject at Johns Hopkins University and Emory University. At the same time, Professor Bullock has presided over several national organizations that have played key roles in promoting China and Asia-related research in the United States and US– China scholarly exchange. Being a “scholar-official,” if I may use an old expression apropos of the Chinese civil service examination system, is by no means a small achievement, especially in an environment where women were often excluded from leadership positions. For decades following her graduate studies at Stanford, Bullock immersed herself in research on the Peking UnionMedical College (PUMC, founded in 1906) and the Rockefeller Foundation’s activities in China in the early twentieth century, which helped the country establish a modern system of education and medical science. These activities can be seen as part of America’s “intellectual investment” in modern China, a subject that, given the legacy of Western imperialism, tends to be controversial. But it is undeniable that the American presence in education, medicine, and public health, among other things, in war-ridden China served the people. By the early twenty-first century, Bullock became a key figure in an endeavor that bears similarities to what the Rockefeller Foundation did a century ago: to established a Chinese-American partnership between Duke University and Wuhan University to develop a 200-acre campus in Kunshan, a town in Jiangsu about forty miles northwest of Shanghai. As the first vice-chancellor of Duke Kunshan The Chinese Historical Review, 28. 1, 68–82, May 2021","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"68 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2021.1924928","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44838563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-02DOI: 10.1080/1547402x.2021.1923217
Guotong Li
{"title":"Orthodox Passions: Narrating Filial Love During the High Qing","authors":"Guotong Li","doi":"10.1080/1547402x.2021.1923217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402x.2021.1923217","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"101 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402x.2021.1923217","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59979154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-02DOI: 10.1080/1547402X.2021.1925407
Richard W. Morain
This article reviews five works on the Sino-Vietnamese War, also referred to as the Third Indochina War. Although many have considered the Vietnamese to have been the victors in that conflict, a closer observation reveals that while China might have suffered disproportionate casualties, they did achieve many of their goals. The ultimate determination of winner or loser rests with the participants of the struggle, not with an outside observer.
{"title":"The Sino-Vietnamese War of 1979","authors":"Richard W. Morain","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2021.1925407","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2021.1925407","url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews five works on the Sino-Vietnamese War, also referred to as the Third Indochina War. Although many have considered the Vietnamese to have been the victors in that conflict, a closer observation reveals that while China might have suffered disproportionate casualties, they did achieve many of their goals. The ultimate determination of winner or loser rests with the participants of the struggle, not with an outside observer.","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"83 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2021.1925407","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49055384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Becoming Guanyin: Artistic Devotion of Buddhist Women in Late Imperial China","authors":"Jamie B. Davenport","doi":"10.1111/rsr.14921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.14921","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"130 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/rsr.14921","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43772598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Sino-Pak relationship is an epitome of long-lasting friendships, despite diverse beliefs, culture, and social system. Pakistan was the first Muslim state to accept China in 1950, while diplomatic relations were begun in 1951. The Sino-Pak has signed various agreements on strategic, diplomatic, and economic spheres, and both countries support each other on international forums. Earlier, the nature of ties was focused on diplomatic and military-based, however, in the twenty-first century; both countries have strengthened the economic relations after the agreements of free trade agreement in 2007 and China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in 2015 respectively. This paper aims to investigate and analyze the significant factors behind the historical dynamics of Pak-China diplomatic ups and downs, strategic associations, and economic cooperation. The theory of complex interdependence uses as theoretical conception in this research work. This case study provides a detailed examination of essential developments among both states from beginning to 2018.
{"title":"History of Pakistan–China Relations: The Complex Interdependence Theory","authors":"Iqtidar Hussain, Israr Hussain, Iqrar Hussain Qambari","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831176","url":null,"abstract":"The Sino-Pak relationship is an epitome of long-lasting friendships, despite diverse beliefs, culture, and social system. Pakistan was the first Muslim state to accept China in 1950, while diplomatic relations were begun in 1951. The Sino-Pak has signed various agreements on strategic, diplomatic, and economic spheres, and both countries support each other on international forums. Earlier, the nature of ties was focused on diplomatic and military-based, however, in the twenty-first century; both countries have strengthened the economic relations after the agreements of free trade agreement in 2007 and China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in 2015 respectively. This paper aims to investigate and analyze the significant factors behind the historical dynamics of Pak-China diplomatic ups and downs, strategic associations, and economic cooperation. The theory of complex interdependence uses as theoretical conception in this research work. This case study provides a detailed examination of essential developments among both states from beginning to 2018.","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"146 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831176","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42882824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-02DOI: 10.1080/1547402X.2020.1789282
Mao Lin
A major historiographic development in the post-Cold War study of the Cold War has been the increased use of multinational and multilingual archives. The use of a wide range of primary sources has ...
冷战后冷战研究的一个主要历史发展是越来越多地使用多国和多语言档案。广泛的主要来源的使用已经。。。
{"title":"Building Ho’s Army: Chinese Military Assistance to North Vietnam","authors":"Mao Lin","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2020.1789282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1789282","url":null,"abstract":"A major historiographic development in the post-Cold War study of the Cold War has been the increased use of multinational and multilingual archives. The use of a wide range of primary sources has ...","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"185 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1789282","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49440764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-02DOI: 10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831178
Loretta E. Kim
This literary and cultural study of zidishu, translated for simplicity as “bannermen tales,” describes and analyzes the experiences of the composers, performers, and audience for these tales during...
{"title":"Bannerman Tales (Zidishu): Manchu Storytelling and Cultural Hybridity in the Qing Dynasty","authors":"Loretta E. Kim","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831178","url":null,"abstract":"This literary and cultural study of zidishu, translated for simplicity as “bannermen tales,” describes and analyzes the experiences of the composers, performers, and audience for these tales during...","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"167 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831178","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41833544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-02DOI: 10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831174
L. Pan
This research investigates the spatial landscape of Hong Kong's earliest imperial war monument, the Cenotaph, from the city's early colonial past to the 1960s. Hong Kong's Cenotaph, which is an almost exact replica of London's Whitehall Cenotaph, reveals how the British Empire established its imperial visual network in its colonies in the early 20th century. However, the prewar visual representation of the royal authorities through the statues of royal members in the colony's central square was replaced by politically neutral designs for civic use after the end of WWII. Through the exploration of the change of meaning of this monumental space in relation to its neighboring environment, I argue that the end of WWII, the social upheavals in the 1960s and the consequent “depoliticization” of British colonial rule have transformed the early war commemorative artefacts in Hong Kong, marginalizing them in the city's major narrative.
{"title":"(Forgotten) Landscape of Imperial War Memories in a Colonial City: Hong Kong's Cenotaph and Beyond (1920s – 1960s)","authors":"L. Pan","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831174","url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates the spatial landscape of Hong Kong's earliest imperial war monument, the Cenotaph, from the city's early colonial past to the 1960s. Hong Kong's Cenotaph, which is an almost exact replica of London's Whitehall Cenotaph, reveals how the British Empire established its imperial visual network in its colonies in the early 20th century. However, the prewar visual representation of the royal authorities through the statues of royal members in the colony's central square was replaced by politically neutral designs for civic use after the end of WWII. Through the exploration of the change of meaning of this monumental space in relation to its neighboring environment, I argue that the end of WWII, the social upheavals in the 1960s and the consequent “depoliticization” of British colonial rule have transformed the early war commemorative artefacts in Hong Kong, marginalizing them in the city's major narrative.","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"20 2","pages":"93 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831174","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41316206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-02DOI: 10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831187
Patrick Fuliang Shan
Paul A. Cohen is a well-known American historian who has exerted a wide-ranging impact upon American academic circles. His significant contributions to Chinese studies earn himself a unique fame, a...
{"title":"A Path Twice Traveled: My Journey as A Historian of China","authors":"Patrick Fuliang Shan","doi":"10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831187","url":null,"abstract":"Paul A. Cohen is a well-known American historian who has exerted a wide-ranging impact upon American academic circles. His significant contributions to Chinese studies earn himself a unique fame, a...","PeriodicalId":41429,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Historical Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"183 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547402X.2020.1831187","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45685930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：