In the context of a reflection on the relationship between sport and identities, the text addresses concepts such as culture, popular hero or subalternity by analyzing the scope of the figure of Argentine soccer player Diego Maradona. His death in November 2020, which provoked huge demonstrations of public grief, unleashed an intense coverage that abused terms such as myth, symbol, hero, idol and identity. The key question revolved around the extent to which Maradona, a peerless sportsman and simultaneously a conflictive public figure, due to his personal conduct (including sports convictions and criminal cases for drug use) and his political positions linked to left-wing populism, could be considered a symbol of a presumed national identity.
{"title":"Maradona: mito popular, símbolo peronista, voz plebeya","authors":"Pablo Alabarces","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.22540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.22540","url":null,"abstract":"In the context of a reflection on the relationship between sport and identities, the text addresses concepts such as culture, popular hero or subalternity by analyzing the scope of the figure of Argentine soccer player Diego Maradona. His death in November 2020, which provoked huge demonstrations of public grief, unleashed an intense coverage that abused terms such as myth, symbol, hero, idol and identity. The key question revolved around the extent to which Maradona, a peerless sportsman and simultaneously a conflictive public figure, due to his personal conduct (including sports convictions and criminal cases for drug use) and his political positions linked to left-wing populism, could be considered a symbol of a presumed national identity.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44868669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article offers a case study after the works by mason Jose Meijon, an artist subjected to psychiatric discipline that, during fifty years, developed a fascinating project over the stones around the town of Marin (Pontevedra, Galicia). His invisible art represents today a telling testimony of the repression under Francisco Franco's dictatorship and of the problems related to the Spanish Civil War's memories. I will defend a possible reconstruction of Meijon's artistic corpus and a number of reading strategies to offer a comprehension of his work in relation to authoritarian developmentalist politics between 1931 and 1980. In order to do so, I will display Meijon's biography and oral legend in relation to his works and to the social and cultural space from which they originate. My goal is to offer a comprehensive reading taking into account history, biography, aesthetics and the space as a whole. In section two, I will present a short political history of Marin's territory and its transformations since the Spanish Civil War, to provide a general frame for Meijon's art. Section three, interrogates his art in relation to the local prehistoric engravers that he explicitly quotes, updating their codes in terms of avant-garde aesthetics. By means of this gesture, Meijon is organizing a memorial writing for the rich religious (protestant) and political (working-class and Republican) local democratic universe, destroyed during the war. Finally, I am interested in focusing political tensions that Meijon’s works arise today face to our so-called processes for the recovering of historical memory.
{"title":"La extracción de la piedra de la memoria. Una estética subalterna bajo el franquismo: el caso del cantero José Meijón","authors":"Germán Labrador Méndez","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.21787","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.21787","url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a case study after the works by mason Jose Meijon, an artist subjected to psychiatric discipline that, during fifty years, developed a fascinating project over the stones around the town of Marin (Pontevedra, Galicia). His invisible art represents today a telling testimony of the repression under Francisco Franco's dictatorship and of the problems related to the Spanish Civil War's memories. I will defend a possible reconstruction of Meijon's artistic corpus and a number of reading strategies to offer a comprehension of his work in relation to authoritarian developmentalist politics between 1931 and 1980. In order to do so, I will display Meijon's biography and oral legend in relation to his works and to the social and cultural space from which they originate. My goal is to offer a comprehensive reading taking into account history, biography, aesthetics and the space as a whole. In section two, I will present a short political history of Marin's territory and its transformations since the Spanish Civil War, to provide a general frame for Meijon's art. Section three, interrogates his art in relation to the local prehistoric engravers that he explicitly quotes, updating their codes in terms of avant-garde aesthetics. By means of this gesture, Meijon is organizing a memorial writing for the rich religious (protestant) and political (working-class and Republican) local democratic universe, destroyed during the war. Finally, I am interested in focusing political tensions that Meijon’s works arise today face to our so-called processes for the recovering of historical memory.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43773853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article reflects on political violence in the Chilean transition based on a dialogue with seven narratives that address the memories built by activists who exercised it during that period. Taking the knowledge produced by activists, produced through the method of “narrative productions”, as a starting point, two axes of analysis emerge: the reconfigurations of the practices, meanings, and possibilities of violence for struggle in post-dictatorial democracy and the continuations of state political violence. The text concludes that Chilean political transition is conformed as a device for the pacification of society. Such a device creates institutions, laws, and discourses that delegitimize, persecute and stigmatize the use of political violence as a form of struggle, while it legitimizes the State political violence, aimed primarily at those who pose a risk to the maintenance of the new order.
{"title":"Continuidades y discontinuidades de la violencia política en la transición a la democracia en Chile","authors":"Isabel Piper-Shafir, Margarita Maria Velez-Maya","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.21912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.21912","url":null,"abstract":"This article reflects on political violence in the Chilean transition based on a dialogue with seven narratives that address the memories built by activists who exercised it during that period. Taking the knowledge produced by activists, produced through the method of “narrative productions”, as a starting point, two axes of analysis emerge: the reconfigurations of the practices, meanings, and possibilities of violence for struggle in post-dictatorial democracy and the continuations of state political violence. The text concludes that Chilean political transition is conformed as a device for the pacification of society. Such a device creates institutions, laws, and discourses that delegitimize, persecute and stigmatize the use of political violence as a form of struggle, while it legitimizes the State political violence, aimed primarily at those who pose a risk to the maintenance of the new order.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44462807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Spain has experienced a very particular transitional justice for which the visibility of those who were victimizers and those who suffered as victims was practically null. There was neither justice nor reparation for the memory of the murdered. A hegemonic memory was imposed by the power that hid the victims, but also their killers. This culture of memory has established rules up to this day according to which the perpetrators cannot be held criminally or morally responsible. Moral repentance does not exist either. The Amnesty Law of 1977 protects them and there is no truth commission that points out the dictatorship's murderers, even if they are not already criminally responsible. Many of these perpetrators are already spectres of the past, but there is a possibility that they will appear in our memory as the negatives "others" of our democratic tradition.
{"title":"Lastres de impunidad. Sombras de amnistía y espanto de victimarios en la España “democrática”","authors":"Jesús Izquierdo Martín","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.21846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.21846","url":null,"abstract":"Spain has experienced a very particular transitional justice for which the visibility of those who were victimizers and those who suffered as victims was practically null. There was neither justice nor reparation for the memory of the murdered. A hegemonic memory was imposed by the power that hid the victims, but also their killers. This culture of memory has established rules up to this day according to which the perpetrators cannot be held criminally or morally responsible. Moral repentance does not exist either. The Amnesty Law of 1977 protects them and there is no truth commission that points out the dictatorship's murderers, even if they are not already criminally responsible. Many of these perpetrators are already spectres of the past, but there is a possibility that they will appear in our memory as the negatives \"others\" of our democratic tradition.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43769091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Agüero, Pablo (2020). Akelarre. Película","authors":"Asier Amezaga Etxebarria","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.22459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.22459","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48199900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article proposes a set of critical reflections on the techno-expert management of the covid-19 pandemic. Leaning on the two major prevention strategies put into practice, quarantines and distancing, the text is not interested in the differentials results at the national level, nor in the reasons that led to their implementation. What it is analyzed are the presuppositions and social imaginaries underlying the decisions made, the homogeneity of the measures that were generalized with very little attention to local contexts, and the ideals of sociability that were mobilized. Above all the article analyzes the tension between the face-to-face and the virtual relations, between a sociability founded on interaction and a sociability that tends to be conceived out from generalized connectivity, as well as the way in which this potentially redesigns a whole new social hierarchy of trades and activities. It is this disparate set of imaginaries, trends and measures that the article criticizes for its anti-sociological and decontextualized nature.
{"title":"La gestión anti-sociológica y tecno-experta de la pandemia del Covid-19","authors":"Danilo Martuccelli","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.21916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.21916","url":null,"abstract":"The article proposes a set of critical reflections on the techno-expert management of the covid-19 pandemic. Leaning on the two major prevention strategies put into practice, quarantines and distancing, the text is not interested in the differentials results at the national level, nor in the reasons that led to their implementation. What it is analyzed are the presuppositions and social imaginaries underlying the decisions made, the homogeneity of the measures that were generalized with very little attention to local contexts, and the ideals of sociability that were mobilized. Above all the article analyzes the tension between the face-to-face and the virtual relations, between a sociability founded on interaction and a sociability that tends to be conceived out from generalized connectivity, as well as the way in which this potentially redesigns a whole new social hierarchy of trades and activities. It is this disparate set of imaginaries, trends and measures that the article criticizes for its anti-sociological and decontextualized nature.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43527674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"McRuer, Robert (2018). Crip Times: Disability, Globalization, and Resistence. Nueva york: New York University Press","authors":"Carlos García Grados","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.21825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.21825","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48623133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper aims to promote the dialogue between Spanish and Anglo-Saxon perspectives that are critical of individual models of disability. Also, the paper seeks to bridge these approaches and qualitative research. Specifically, I claim that Dis/ability Studies (D/aS) are a well-suited approach to ground this field of inquiry. This emergent perspective explores the "dis/ability complex" from an intersectional stance. That is, the way in which attributes linked to ability and disability are mutually constitutive, and simultaneously reproduced by disablism and ableism as well as other systems of social differentiation. This work advances twelve research questions that derive from D/aS and two of their theoretical foundations (poststructuralism and postconventionalism). Drawing on poststructuralism, I conceptualise disability as a foucaultian apparatus the ableist regime of intelligibility of which is shaped by individual models of disability. On the other hand, postconventional theories such as posthumanism and theories of affect allow us to explore the material and affective assemblages that corporealise the disabled subject, reproducing and/or subverting the disability apparatus. I conclude by pointing out that ‘ableism’ and ‘disablism’ can further the debate between theoretical and activist fields beyond ‘disability’.
{"title":"Los Estudios de la Dis/capacidad: una propuesta no individualizante para interrogar críticamente la producción del cuerpo-sujeto discapacitado","authors":"Laura Sanmiquel-Molinero","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.20974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.20974","url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to promote the dialogue between Spanish and Anglo-Saxon perspectives that are critical of individual models of disability. Also, the paper seeks to bridge these approaches and qualitative research. Specifically, I claim that Dis/ability Studies (D/aS) are a well-suited approach to ground this field of inquiry. This emergent perspective explores the \"dis/ability complex\" from an intersectional stance. That is, the way in which attributes linked to ability and disability are mutually constitutive, and simultaneously reproduced by disablism and ableism as well as other systems of social differentiation. This work advances twelve research questions that derive from D/aS and two of their theoretical foundations (poststructuralism and postconventionalism). Drawing on poststructuralism, I conceptualise disability as a foucaultian apparatus the ableist regime of intelligibility of which is shaped by individual models of disability. On the other hand, postconventional theories such as posthumanism and theories of affect allow us to explore the material and affective assemblages that corporealise the disabled subject, reproducing and/or subverting the disability apparatus. I conclude by pointing out that ‘ableism’ and ‘disablism’ can further the debate between theoretical and activist fields beyond ‘disability’.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47315716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper was originally published with the title “Compulsory Able-bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence” in the volume Disabling the Humanities edited by Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann y Rosemarie Garland-Thomson in 2002. In the paper, Robert McRuer proposes a theory of compulsory able-bodiedness based both in the work of Adrienne Rich and in Judith Butler’s performativity theory. The paper questions that the trouble lies not in disability, but in normality. The author argues the necessity of an alliance among studies and movements of disability and queer .
这篇论文最初发表在Sharon L.Snyder、Brenda Jo Brueggemann和Rosemarie Garland Thomson于2002年编辑的《禁用人文》一书中，标题为“强制性的有能力的身体和酷儿/残疾的存在”。罗伯特·麦克鲁尔在阿德里安·里奇的作品和朱迪斯·巴特勒的表演性理论的基础上，提出了一种强制性的形体理论。该论文质疑，问题不在于残疾，而在于正常。作者认为，在残疾和酷儿的研究和运动之间建立联盟的必要性。
{"title":"Capacidad corporal obligatoria y existencia discapacitada queer","authors":"Robert N. Mcruer","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.21903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.21903","url":null,"abstract":"This paper was originally published with the title “Compulsory Able-bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence” in the volume Disabling the Humanities edited by Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann y Rosemarie Garland-Thomson in 2002. In the paper, Robert McRuer proposes a theory of compulsory able-bodiedness based both in the work of Adrienne Rich and in Judith Butler’s performativity theory. The paper questions that the trouble lies not in disability, but in normality. The author argues the necessity of an alliance among studies and movements of disability and queer .","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46928883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article seeks to make an anthropological contribution in relation to two related purposes. First, based on the body itineraries of a cisgender adult woman and a man, of similar age, who live in Buenos Aires and share a social position as rengos , we explore the assemblages of gender, (disabled) body and sexuality. Secondly, a critique of the subalternization and reification of the corporal difference within the capitalist mode of production is developed and links are identified between different matrices that generate discrimination. Placing the body as common ground of human experience, the text advocates the formation of alliances between collectives as a means to face common oppressions.
{"title":"Ensamblajes de género, cuerpo y sexualidad en las narrativas de dos rengos","authors":"Luisina Castelli Rodríguez","doi":"10.1387/PCEIC.20985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1387/PCEIC.20985","url":null,"abstract":"The article seeks to make an anthropological contribution in relation to two related purposes. First, based on the body itineraries of a cisgender adult woman and a man, of similar age, who live in Buenos Aires and share a social position as rengos , we explore the assemblages of gender, (disabled) body and sexuality. Secondly, a critique of the subalternization and reification of the corporal difference within the capitalist mode of production is developed and links are identified between different matrices that generate discrimination. Placing the body as common ground of human experience, the text advocates the formation of alliances between collectives as a means to face common oppressions.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46748109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：