Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.36019/9780813550237-008
Ronald C. Kramer, D. Kauzlarich
{"title":"Chapter 3. Nuclear Weapons, International Law, and the Normalization of State Crime","authors":"Ronald C. Kramer, D. Kauzlarich","doi":"10.36019/9780813550237-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813550237-008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42457,"journal":{"name":"State Crime","volume":"411 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75806396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.36019/9780813550237-014
Jeffrey Ian Ross
In 1995 my edited book "Controlling State Crime" was published (Ross 1995a). Five years later, not only was my follow-up edited book, "Varieties of State Crime and Its Control," released (hereafter "Varieties"), but so too was the second edition of "Controlling State Crime" (Ross 2000a, 2000b). In between the time that the two books were published, and since the release of Varieties, the once nascent field of state crime, interchangeably labeled governmental crime, illegality, lawlessness, official deviance, or misconduct, has evolved. Old and rudimentary ideas have either been abandoned or modified, and numerous subject-relevant essays and case studies have accumulated. Some scholars of the subject of state crime have produced a steady flow of research, while others have moved on to different criminological/criminal justice subjects. Then again, new and emerging young scholars have entered the field carrying the banner of this cross-disciplinary field.Personal history aside, the following sections attempt to give the reader a sense of the major arguments from the original "Controlling State Crime," followed by a review of Varieties, and then a review of what scholarly research has been produced since then to answer the proverbial question of what I would have done differently had I had to do it again. This is not an easy question to answer. As a relatively introspective scholar, I frequently question my agency and actions, and no ox is too sacred to gore, particularly if it is an edited book.
{"title":"Chapter 8. Reinventing Controlling State Crime and Varieties of State Crime and Its Control: What I Would Have Done Differently","authors":"Jeffrey Ian Ross","doi":"10.36019/9780813550237-014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813550237-014","url":null,"abstract":"In 1995 my edited book \"Controlling State Crime\" was published (Ross 1995a). Five years later, not only was my follow-up edited book, \"Varieties of State Crime and Its Control,\" released (hereafter \"Varieties\"), but so too was the second edition of \"Controlling State Crime\" (Ross 2000a, 2000b). In between the time that the two books were published, and since the release of Varieties, the once nascent field of state crime, interchangeably labeled governmental crime, illegality, lawlessness, official deviance, or misconduct, has evolved. Old and rudimentary ideas have either been abandoned or modified, and numerous subject-relevant essays and case studies have accumulated. Some scholars of the subject of state crime have produced a steady flow of research, while others have moved on to different criminological/criminal justice subjects. Then again, new and emerging young scholars have entered the field carrying the banner of this cross-disciplinary field.Personal history aside, the following sections attempt to give the reader a sense of the major arguments from the original \"Controlling State Crime,\" followed by a review of Varieties, and then a review of what scholarly research has been produced since then to answer the proverbial question of what I would have done differently had I had to do it again. This is not an easy question to answer. As a relatively introspective scholar, I frequently question my agency and actions, and no ox is too sacred to gore, particularly if it is an edited book.","PeriodicalId":42457,"journal":{"name":"State Crime","volume":"238 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86698217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.13169/statecrime.9.1.0047
Patrick Hein
This paper examines WWII forced labour memory politics in Germany and Japan by drawing from Barkan’s concept of amending historical injustices. After lengthy negotiations, Germany reached in 2000 a milestone agreement compensating victims individually, while in Japan, settlements, consolation payments and apologies have been overshadowed by a revival of revisionist historical narratives and victim denial. It is argued that the official recognition of forced labour as historical injustice made a mutually acceptable outcome possible in Germany and helped to shape a genuine historical memory in victim nations. In Japan, by contrast, an alliance of politicians, bureaucrats and academics has been reconsecrating revisionism as official position. The revisionist inability to recognize victims and admit mistakes has implications for South Korea as the rift between right-wing pro-revisionists and left-wing nationalists divides the country and prevents the formation of a shared collective memory. Unintended consequences have dimmed prospects for a settlement.
{"title":"The ambiguities of amending historical injustices and espousing a\u0000 shared collective memory: the WWII forced labour narratives in Germany and\u0000 Japan","authors":"Patrick Hein","doi":"10.13169/statecrime.9.1.0047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.9.1.0047","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines WWII forced labour memory politics in Germany and Japan by drawing from Barkan’s concept of amending historical injustices. After lengthy negotiations, Germany reached in 2000 a milestone agreement compensating victims individually, while in Japan, settlements, consolation payments and apologies have been overshadowed by a revival of revisionist historical narratives and victim denial. It is argued that the official recognition of forced labour as historical injustice made a mutually acceptable outcome possible in Germany and helped to shape a genuine historical memory in victim nations. In Japan, by contrast, an alliance of politicians, bureaucrats and academics has been reconsecrating revisionism as official position. The revisionist inability to recognize victims and admit mistakes has implications for South Korea as the rift between right-wing pro-revisionists and left-wing nationalists divides the country and prevents the formation of a shared collective memory. Unintended consequences have dimmed prospects for a settlement.","PeriodicalId":42457,"journal":{"name":"State Crime","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66273975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01DOI: 10.13169/statecrime.9.1.0129
S. Poynting
Authenticity (Rickly, 2019) and environment sustainability (PulidoFernandez et al., 2019) are both key contributors of tourismgrowth. Space Tourism. The Elusive Dream presents an authentic and still to be explored form of tourism. That said, space tourism, because of its cost, is currently accessible to a very limited number of tourists. Space tourism falls under the category of special interest tourism (SIT). SIT occurs “when the traveller’s motivation and decisionmaking are primarily determined by a particular special interest with a focus either on activity/ies and/or destinations and settings” (Trauer, 2006, p. 186).
{"title":"Book review","authors":"S. Poynting","doi":"10.13169/statecrime.9.1.0129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.9.1.0129","url":null,"abstract":"Authenticity (Rickly, 2019) and environment sustainability (PulidoFernandez et al., 2019) are both key contributors of tourismgrowth. Space Tourism. The Elusive Dream presents an authentic and still to be explored form of tourism. That said, space tourism, because of its cost, is currently accessible to a very limited number of tourists. Space tourism falls under the category of special interest tourism (SIT). SIT occurs “when the traveller’s motivation and decisionmaking are primarily determined by a particular special interest with a focus either on activity/ies and/or destinations and settings” (Trauer, 2006, p. 186).","PeriodicalId":42457,"journal":{"name":"State Crime","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44260016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-01DOI: 10.13169/STATECRIME.8.1.0039
James Heydon
Green criminologists often deploy the notion of harm to capture patterns of environmental victimisation sitting outside the narrow and legalistic confines of environmental ‘crime’. In doing so, their analytical gaze is cast wide, resulting in a lack of focus on states and their specific obligations to protect citizens from such victimisation. The current article addresses this by using the dialectic conception of state crime to direct criminological attention towards these obligations. Using its constituent elements of human rights, deviance and legitimacy, the article examines the state duty to protect environmental human rights, the importance of involving opposition groups in research on deviant state activity, and the challenges faced by scholars attempting to evidence the illegitimacy of such practice. In doing so, literature from state crime and green criminological scholarship is synthesised, resulting in a concept of state environmental crime that is of utility to both fields.
{"title":"Greening the Concept of State Crime","authors":"James Heydon","doi":"10.13169/STATECRIME.8.1.0039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/STATECRIME.8.1.0039","url":null,"abstract":"Green criminologists often deploy the notion of harm to capture patterns of environmental victimisation sitting outside the narrow and legalistic confines of environmental ‘crime’. In doing so, their analytical gaze is cast wide, resulting in a lack of focus on states and their specific obligations to protect citizens from such victimisation. The current article addresses this by using the dialectic conception of state crime to direct criminological attention towards these obligations. Using its constituent elements of human rights, deviance and legitimacy, the article examines the state duty to protect environmental human rights, the importance of involving opposition groups in research on deviant state activity, and the challenges faced by scholars attempting to evidence the illegitimacy of such practice. In doing so, literature from state crime and green criminological scholarship is synthesised, resulting in a concept of state environmental crime that is of utility to both fields.","PeriodicalId":42457,"journal":{"name":"State Crime","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44840102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-01-01DOI: 10.13169/statecrime.8.1.0104
Perugini, Gordon
{"title":"Between Sovereignty and Race: The Bombardment of Hospitals in the\u0000 Italo-Ethiopian War and the Colonial Imprint of International\u0000 Law","authors":"Perugini, Gordon","doi":"10.13169/statecrime.8.1.0104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.8.1.0104","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42457,"journal":{"name":"State Crime","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66274085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：