The code of canon law mentions the intervention of an interpreter in the context of canonical trials as well as for the celebration of the sacraments of penance (c. 990) and marriage (c. 1106). The deaf person is specifically named in canon 1471 where the legislator recommends that a sworn interpreter be employed for the interrogation of persons using a language which is not understood by the judges. The present study examines canonical and ethical questions concerning interpreters for the Deaf: the difficult choice of a sworn sign language interpreter, confidentiality and canonical secrecy, the proper and faithful fulfilment of the function. The author gives preference to interpreters who have good professional standards and follow a code of ethics. Since Deaf culture is still quite unknown the interpreter should also be able to assure cultural mediation.
{"title":"Culture sourde, droit canonique et déontologie professionnelle","authors":"A. Bamberg","doi":"10.2143/ETL.81.1.616511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.81.1.616511","url":null,"abstract":"The code of canon law mentions the intervention of an interpreter in the context of canonical trials as well as for the celebration of the sacraments of penance (c. 990) and marriage (c. 1106). The deaf person is specifically named in canon 1471 where the legislator recommends that a sworn interpreter be employed for the interrogation of persons using a language which is not understood by the judges. The present study examines canonical and ethical questions concerning interpreters for the Deaf: the difficult choice of a sworn sign language interpreter, confidentiality and canonical secrecy, the proper and faithful fulfilment of the function. The author gives preference to interpreters who have good professional standards and follow a code of ethics. Since Deaf culture is still quite unknown the interpreter should also be able to assure cultural mediation.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"87 1","pages":"200-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2005-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73207661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Scholarly interest in Jn 11,47-52 has been focused primarily on the following areas: (1) the meaning of hyper in vv. 50-52; (2) Jewish parallels to Caiaphas’ speech in v. 50; (3) the tradition-historical background to the designation “gathering of the dispersed” in v. 52b; and (4) the identity of the “children of God” in v. 52b. What has not been fully appreciated is the combined affect of the motifs of this pericope. This article attempts to argue that John’s explanation of the final plot to kill Jesus is constructed in such a way that Jesus’ death is the event that provides an answer to the plight of Israel: the destruction of the Temple and the people and the ongoing dispersion of Israel. Read against the background of the OT and Judaism, the motifs that make up the argument of this pericope draw upon Israel’s historical plight in order to show that Jesus’ death will effect the restoration promises of Israel’s scriptures.
{"title":"Restoration in John 11,47-52 : Reading the key motifs in their jewish context","authors":"Johnnye L Dennis","doi":"10.2143/ETL.81.1.616502","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.81.1.616502","url":null,"abstract":"Scholarly interest in Jn 11,47-52 has been focused primarily on the following areas: (1) the meaning of hyper in vv. 50-52; (2) Jewish parallels to Caiaphas’ speech in v. 50; (3) the tradition-historical background to the designation “gathering of the dispersed” in v. 52b; and (4) the identity of the “children of God” in v. 52b. What has not been fully appreciated is the combined affect of the motifs of this pericope. This article attempts to argue that John’s explanation of the final plot to kill Jesus is constructed in such a way that Jesus’ death is the event that provides an answer to the plight of Israel: the destruction of the Temple and the people and the ongoing dispersion of Israel. Read against the background of the OT and Judaism, the motifs that make up the argument of this pericope draw upon Israel’s historical plight in order to show that Jesus’ death will effect the restoration promises of Israel’s scriptures.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"55 1","pages":"57-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2005-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86544637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article analyses the relationship between the Johannine narratives of the raising of Lazarus and the anointing at Bethany and several synoptic texts (Mk 5,21-43 par.; Mk 14,3-9 par.; Lk 7,11-17; 10,38-42; 16,19-31). The investigation of this relationship uses the notions of intertextuality and hypertextuality. The analysis proceeds in three steps. The first consists in finding intertextual traces. In the second step, the purpose of the comparison of the action-sequences is to find out the existence of a hypertextual relationship. Finally, the examination concentrates on the transformations affecting both characterisation and action-sequence.
{"title":"Intertextualité et hypertextualité en Jn 11,1-12,11","authors":"M-E Kiessel","doi":"10.2143/ETL.81.1.616501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.81.1.616501","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the relationship between the Johannine narratives of the raising of Lazarus and the anointing at Bethany and several synoptic texts (Mk 5,21-43 par.; Mk 14,3-9 par.; Lk 7,11-17; 10,38-42; 16,19-31). The investigation of this relationship uses the notions of intertextuality and hypertextuality. The analysis proceeds in three steps. The first consists in finding intertextual traces. In the second step, the purpose of the comparison of the action-sequences is to find out the existence of a hypertextual relationship. Finally, the examination concentrates on the transformations affecting both characterisation and action-sequence.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"50 1","pages":"29-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2005-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87548899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Romeinen 7,25b in de Nieuwe Bijbelvertaling","authors":"J. Lambrecht","doi":"10.2143/ETL.81.1.616510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.81.1.616510","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"52 1","pages":"197-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2005-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74765866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This note first provides an overview of the presentation of H. T. Fleddermann’s proposal (Mark and Q, BETL 122, Leuven, 1995, esp. pp. 85-87) that the Measure saying in Mk 4,24cd is Mark’s redaction of Q 6,38c and 12,31b. In the interest of completeness, the note spends some time reviewing Fleddermann’s reconstruction of the Q-texts. After that, the note critiques his methodology as insufficient for establishing Mark’s dependence on Q for his Measure saying (this note follows the author’s similar treatment of two other sayings: Mk 4,21 and Q 11,33, in ETL 79 [2003] 423-430; Mk 4,22 and Q 12,2, in ETL 80 [2004] 439-444). The note shows that Fleddermann’s proposal requires that Mark take both of these Q verses out of their own logical contexts, connect them rather uncomfortably, and pass over other sayings in the Q-sermon (essentially 6,20-49) that would have served even better Mark’s use of the Measure saying to refer to quality of the disciple’s hearing of the word. The note concludes that it seems more likely that the widespread Measure axiom was known to Mark as an independent saying, which he uses here for his own purposes.
本文首先概述了h.t. Fleddermann的建议(Mark and Q, BETL 122, Leuven, 1995, pp. 85-87)，即Mk 4,24cd中的Measure说法是Mark对Q 6,38c和12,31b的修订。为了完整起见，本笔记花了一些时间回顾弗莱德曼对q文本的重建。在那之后，注释批评他的方法不足以建立马可对Q的依赖，因为他的测量说(这个注释遵循作者对其他两个说法的类似处理:马可福音4,21和q11,33，在ETL 79 [2003] 423-430;Mk 4,22和Q 12,2，在ETL 80[2004] 439-444)。注释显示，弗莱德曼的建议要求马可把这两个Q节经文从它们自己的逻辑上下文中拿出来，把它们很不舒服地联系起来，并忽略了Q节讲道中的其他经文(本质上是6,20-49)，这些经文可能会更好地服务于马可使用度量说来指门徒听到这个词的质量。该笔记的结论是，似乎更有可能的是，马克知道广为流传的Measure公理是一个独立的说法，他在这里使用它来达到自己的目的。
{"title":"The measure : Mk 4,24cd and Q 6,38c; 12,31b A note on its independence from Q","authors":"T. A. Friedrichsen","doi":"10.2143/ETL.81.1.616509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.81.1.616509","url":null,"abstract":"This note first provides an overview of the presentation of H. T. Fleddermann’s proposal (Mark and Q, BETL 122, Leuven, 1995, esp. pp. 85-87) that the Measure saying in Mk 4,24cd is Mark’s redaction of Q 6,38c and 12,31b. In the interest of completeness, the note spends some time reviewing Fleddermann’s reconstruction of the Q-texts. After that, the note critiques his methodology as insufficient for establishing Mark’s dependence on Q for his Measure saying (this note follows the author’s similar treatment of two other sayings: Mk 4,21 and Q 11,33, in ETL 79 [2003] 423-430; Mk 4,22 and Q 12,2, in ETL 80 [2004] 439-444). The note shows that Fleddermann’s proposal requires that Mark take both of these Q verses out of their own logical contexts, connect them rather uncomfortably, and pass over other sayings in the Q-sermon (essentially 6,20-49) that would have served even better Mark’s use of the Measure saying to refer to quality of the disciple’s hearing of the word. The note concludes that it seems more likely that the widespread Measure axiom was known to Mark as an independent saying, which he uses here for his own purposes.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"35 1","pages":"186-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2005-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90622303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Source-language oriented remarks on the lexicography of the greek versions of the Bible","authors":"J. Joosten","doi":"10.2143/ETL.81.1.616506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.81.1.616506","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"14 1","pages":"152-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2005-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90481330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The question of the extent to which the Septuagint reflects an evolution in messianic belief in comparison with the Masoretic Text has come into prominence in recent years, and in view of the role played by messianism in Jewish belief of the late Second Temple period and in early Christianity it seemed very appropriate that "The Septuagint and Messianism" should be chosen as the theme of the 2004 Colloquium Biblicum Lovaniense. This volume contains the papers given at the Colloquium, which are concerned both with methodological issues and with the interpretation of specific texts (in practice the majority of the texts in the Septuagint for which a messianic interpretation has been claimed). The papers are very far from all reflecting the same approach, and it has frequently happened that the same texts have been treated by different contributors from very different viewpoints. But the fact such different viewpoints are expressed is a proper reflection of the complexity of the issues involved in the question of the extent of messianic belief in the Septuagint, and of the fact that the question requires a nuanced answer. It is in any case hoped that the varied approaches reflected in the papers will serve to make clear the underlying reasons for the differences between those who take a "minimalist" and those who take a "maximalist" view on the subject of the Septuagint and Messianism.
{"title":"The Septuagint and messianism","authors":"M. Knibb, Journées bibliques de Louvain","doi":"10.2143/ETL.80.4.542113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.80.4.542113","url":null,"abstract":"The question of the extent to which the Septuagint reflects an evolution in messianic belief in comparison with the Masoretic Text has come into prominence in recent years, and in view of the role played by messianism in Jewish belief of the late Second Temple period and in early Christianity it seemed very appropriate that \"The Septuagint and Messianism\" should be chosen as the theme of the 2004 Colloquium Biblicum Lovaniense. This volume contains the papers given at the Colloquium, which are concerned both with methodological issues and with the interpretation of specific texts (in practice the majority of the texts in the Septuagint for which a messianic interpretation has been claimed). The papers are very far from all reflecting the same approach, and it has frequently happened that the same texts have been treated by different contributors from very different viewpoints. But the fact such different viewpoints are expressed is a proper reflection of the complexity of the issues involved in the question of the extent of messianic belief in the Septuagint, and of the fact that the question requires a nuanced answer. It is in any case hoped that the varied approaches reflected in the papers will serve to make clear the underlying reasons for the differences between those who take a \"minimalist\" and those who take a \"maximalist\" view on the subject of the Septuagint and Messianism.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"22 1","pages":"555-568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2005-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86118772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：