Analyzing witness obligation in giving testimony according to Indonesian civil procedural law is the objective of this writing. With the normative judicial method, concluded There is inconsistency in Indonesian civil procedural law in regulating the witness obligation. Punishment is provided for a witness when they neglected the hearing summons as regulated in Article 140 HIR/157 RBG, but in contrast article 143 HIR/170 RBG stated that no one may be forced to come before a court to testify in civil matters if the district court beyond their resides. Giving the same regulation with the current civil procedural law, the civil procedural law bill shows contradiction within its law and also with another law. Abandonment of court summons as a witness is a criminal offense with a sentence of six months in prison (Article 224 paragraph of the Criminal Code). The inconsistency and contradiction to some extent may bring negative impact to law enforcement and the law should be an amendment.
{"title":"Paradoks Kewajiban Bersaksi pada Ketentuan Hukum Acara Perdata","authors":"Zakki Adlhiyati","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I2.82","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I2.82","url":null,"abstract":"Analyzing witness obligation in giving testimony according to Indonesian civil procedural law is the objective of this writing. With the normative judicial method, concluded There is inconsistency in Indonesian civil procedural law in regulating the witness obligation. Punishment is provided for a witness when they neglected the hearing summons as regulated in Article 140 HIR/157 RBG, but in contrast article 143 HIR/170 RBG stated that no one may be forced to come before a court to testify in civil matters if the district court beyond their resides. Giving the same regulation with the current civil procedural law, the civil procedural law bill shows contradiction within its law and also with another law. Abandonment of court summons as a witness is a criminal offense with a sentence of six months in prison (Article 224 paragraph of the Criminal Code). The inconsistency and contradiction to some extent may bring negative impact to law enforcement and the law should be an amendment.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123723085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The divorce rate in Indonesia is quite high according to the data presented by Religious Jurisdiction Chamber (Badilag) of Indonesian Supreme Court in 2015 there are 96,678 cases of talak petition and 249,578 cases of divorce lawsuit. This article will elaborate the legal consequences of talak petition based on the reasons that the respondent (wife) has committed seditious (nusyuz) against claimant (husband), moreover this article will also reveal empirically the motivation of the wife committed seditious. In most cases, the wife may commit seditious triggered by violent act committed by her husband or marry another woman secretly. When trying such cases, the court must adjudicate carefully and thoroughly the reasons of request for talak which contended by the husband and its background. The careful and thorough trial on the evidences presented by the parties may lead to judgment which just and fair as the settlement of the dispute in divorce cases and distribution of matrimony properties.
{"title":"PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERKAWINAN TERHADAP HARTA BERSAMA TERKAIT ISTERI NUSYUZ (DURHAKA) DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA DI INDONESIA","authors":"Syahrial Razak","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.62","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.62","url":null,"abstract":"The divorce rate in Indonesia is quite high according to the data presented by Religious Jurisdiction Chamber (Badilag) of Indonesian Supreme Court in 2015 there are 96,678 cases of talak petition and 249,578 cases of divorce lawsuit. This article will elaborate the legal consequences of talak petition based on the reasons that the respondent (wife) has committed seditious (nusyuz) against claimant (husband), moreover this article will also reveal empirically the motivation of the wife committed seditious. In most cases, the wife may commit seditious triggered by violent act committed by her husband or marry another woman secretly. When trying such cases, the court must adjudicate carefully and thoroughly the reasons of request for talak which contended by the husband and its background. The careful and thorough trial on the evidences presented by the parties may lead to judgment which just and fair as the settlement of the dispute in divorce cases and distribution of matrimony properties.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114275757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Basically, the procedural law of industrial relations court is quite similar to civil procedure apply in ordinary court. Article 57 of Law No. 2 of 2004 states that the procedural law apply in industrial relations court is civil procedure apply in ordinary court, unless particularly provided in Law No. 2 of 2004. It means that Law No. 2 of 2004 is lex specialis of HIR, RBg, or Rv. Site examination often held in civil proceeding to obtain certain evidence and make clear the case. Unfortunately, in industrial relations case, site examination may lead to obstacles for the judges and the parties, mostly for the employees, since the time limit to solve the case and the costs that should be paid by the parties.
{"title":"SIDANG PEMERIKSAAN SETEMPAT PADA PERADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DALAM PELAKSANAAN ASAS PERADILAN CEPAT TEPAT ADIL DAN MURAH","authors":"Holyness N Singadimeja, S. Puteri","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.69","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.69","url":null,"abstract":"Basically, the procedural law of industrial relations court is quite similar to civil procedure apply in ordinary court. Article 57 of Law No. 2 of 2004 states that the procedural law apply in industrial relations court is civil procedure apply in ordinary court, unless particularly provided in Law No. 2 of 2004. It means that Law No. 2 of 2004 is lex specialis of HIR, RBg, or Rv. Site examination often held in civil proceeding to obtain certain evidence and make clear the case. Unfortunately, in industrial relations case, site examination may lead to obstacles for the judges and the parties, mostly for the employees, since the time limit to solve the case and the costs that should be paid by the parties.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115128563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The living law is a refl ection of the community values as accommodated in Article 5(1) of Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judiciary Power, which encourages judges to fi nd and apprehend the values of law and justice of the societies. Inheritance dispute settlement in Indonesia may give the judges some options to implement certain law because of the pluralistic pattern of Indonesian inheritance law. On the other hand, the judges may have function to complement statutory laws and may create new law through forming law or fi nding law to be implemented on certain pending case. The judges must have a thorough knowledge and interpret the law applied on certain case. For instance when the deceased was a Moslem, while one of the heirs is a non-Muslim, the judges of religious court may decide that non-Muslim heir entitled to the bequest as wasiat wajibah. Likewise, the judges of district court may implement inheritance law of adat law or Civil Code. The pluralism of the sources of law in inheritance cases is quite a problem for the judges, therefore the Supreme Court has enacted a guidelines in Circular Letter No. MA/Kumdil/171/VK/1991, dated on 8 May 1991. This article will question the implementation of the guidelines.
{"title":"PENEMUAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM DALAM PERKARA WARIS SESUAI ASAS KEADILAN","authors":"Ning Adiasih","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.63","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.63","url":null,"abstract":"The living law is a refl ection of the community values as accommodated in Article 5(1) of Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judiciary Power, which encourages judges to fi nd and apprehend the values of law and justice of the societies. Inheritance dispute settlement in Indonesia may give the judges some options to implement certain law because of the pluralistic pattern of Indonesian inheritance law. On the other hand, the judges may have function to complement statutory laws and may create new law through forming law or fi nding law to be implemented on certain pending case. The judges must have a thorough knowledge and interpret the law applied on certain case. For instance when the deceased was a Moslem, while one of the heirs is a non-Muslim, the judges of religious court may decide that non-Muslim heir entitled to the bequest as wasiat wajibah. Likewise, the judges of district court may implement inheritance law of adat law or Civil Code. The pluralism of the sources of law in inheritance cases is quite a problem for the judges, therefore the Supreme Court has enacted a guidelines in Circular Letter No. MA/Kumdil/171/VK/1991, dated on 8 May 1991. This article will question the implementation of the guidelines.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130471763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Polygamy is allowed only for those who their law and religion allowing a husband to have more than a wife. Such provision has been stated in general elucidation of Marriage Law at point 4c states that “This Law encourages monogamy. Only if requested by concerned parties, under their law and religion of the concerned parties, which allowing a husband to have more than a wife.” The word “law” in general elucidation of Marriage Law at point 4c refers to the marriage law of the husband. The Judge of Religious Court may have competency to consider any reasons and requirements of request for polygamy. The Judge of Religious Court shall try the case and render its judgment in accordance to the prevailing laws, Al Qur’an, Al Hadits, and the opinion of Islamic scholars. The judgment must have clear and suffi cient consideration, in which the judge may base its verdict. Article 62(1) of Law No. 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Court provides that all ex parte decisions and judgments rendered by the court shall contain sufficient consideration and refer to certain rules of the prevailing laws both written or unwritten regulation.
{"title":"PENYELESAIAN PERMOHONAN IZIN POLIGAMI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN KEWENANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN","authors":"Devianty Fitri, Yussy Adelina Mannas","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.61","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.61","url":null,"abstract":"Polygamy is allowed only for those who their law and religion allowing a husband to have more than a wife. Such provision has been stated in general elucidation of Marriage Law at point 4c states that “This Law encourages monogamy. Only if requested by concerned parties, under their law and religion of the concerned parties, which allowing a husband to have more than a wife.” The word “law” in general elucidation of Marriage Law at point 4c refers to the marriage law of the husband. The Judge of Religious Court may have competency to consider any reasons and requirements of request for polygamy. The Judge of Religious Court shall try the case and render its judgment in accordance to the prevailing laws, Al Qur’an, Al Hadits, and the opinion of Islamic scholars. The judgment must have clear and suffi cient consideration, in which the judge may base its verdict. Article 62(1) of Law No. 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Court provides that all ex parte decisions and judgments rendered by the court shall contain sufficient consideration and refer to certain rules of the prevailing laws both written or unwritten regulation.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115876894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Land reclamation over the coast has four philosophically values, among others is that reclamation must observe prevailing regulations. An administrative lawsuit has been lodged into Jakarta Administrative Court against the Governor of Jakarta Decree No. 2485 of 2015 concerning License on K Island Reclamation. The problems arose over the case both legally, socially, and philosophically. This article will examine the Administrative Court consideration over the case, especially on the issues of the implication of Governor’s license, coastal region use in the perspective of sustainable development, and the implication of license towards the case pending before civil court. The research methodology uses normative research. The research fi nds that the license issued by the Jakarta Governor comply with Article 93(1) of Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Protection and Management of Living Environment. The use of coastal region should be directed for the achievement of sustainability of ecology, economy, social, and cultural. The implication of license related to civil case has a correlation that the licensee cannot freely doing reclamation even though he holds a license. The licensee must observe the impact of reclamation over surrounding environment. A civil lawsuit based on unlawful act committed by the licensee can be submitted if the reclamation infl icts fi nancial loss to the surrounding community.
{"title":"REKLAMASI PULAU K DALAM PERSPEKTIF PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN DAN KEKUATAN HUKUM IZINNYA","authors":"Untoro Untoro, H. Siregar","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.65","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.65","url":null,"abstract":"Land reclamation over the coast has four philosophically values, among others is that reclamation must observe prevailing regulations. An administrative lawsuit has been lodged into Jakarta Administrative Court against the Governor of Jakarta Decree No. 2485 of 2015 concerning License on K Island Reclamation. The problems arose over the case both legally, socially, and philosophically. This article will examine the Administrative Court consideration over the case, especially on the issues of the implication of Governor’s license, coastal region use in the perspective of sustainable development, and the implication of license towards the case pending before civil court. The research methodology uses normative research. The research fi nds that the license issued by the Jakarta Governor comply with Article 93(1) of Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Protection and Management of Living Environment. The use of coastal region should be directed for the achievement of sustainability of ecology, economy, social, and cultural. The implication of license related to civil case has a correlation that the licensee cannot freely doing reclamation even though he holds a license. The licensee must observe the impact of reclamation over surrounding environment. A civil lawsuit based on unlawful act committed by the licensee can be submitted if the reclamation infl icts fi nancial loss to the surrounding community.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115511487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Consumer dispute related to violation of the consumer rights by businessman. Article 45 of Consumer Protection Law provides that the dispute may be settled by out of court dispute settlement or through litigation. In Indonesia, out of court dispute settlement of consumer disputes is conducted under the authority of Consumer Disputes Settlement Body (BPSK), while in litigation mechanism exercised with submission by the consumer personally, class action, or NGO claim. Consumer dispute settlement is part of civil litigation. According to Article 163 HIR/ 283 RBg, the party who alleges that he has a right shall proof his allegation. While, according to Article 19(5) of Consumer Protection Law, the businessman may be exempted from its duty, if it can proof that the damages suffered by the consumer is because of the consumer fault itself. Therefore, the businessman must prove that it did not commit any fault (shifting the burden of proof). The principle of shifting the burden of proof has adopted by Consumer Protection Law because the consumer has no suffi cient knowledge of materials, production process, and distribution process which done by the businessman regularly. The Consumer Protection Law has no clear provision on the implementation of shifting the burden of proof, while the same situation is also found in Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2006 concerning Appeal on the Judgment of BPSK. Thus, there are inconsistency implementations on the shifting of the burden of proof between on case by case. It depends on the comprehension knowledge of the judges. Such situation may lead to ineffective implementation of Consumer Protection Law.
{"title":"PENERAPAN ASAS PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN","authors":"M. Syam","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.66","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.66","url":null,"abstract":"Consumer dispute related to violation of the consumer rights by businessman. Article 45 of Consumer Protection Law provides that the dispute may be settled by out of court dispute settlement or through litigation. In Indonesia, out of court dispute settlement of consumer disputes is conducted under the authority of Consumer Disputes Settlement Body (BPSK), while in litigation mechanism exercised with submission by the consumer personally, class action, or NGO claim. Consumer dispute settlement is part of civil litigation. According to Article 163 HIR/ 283 RBg, the party who alleges that he has a right shall proof his allegation. While, according to Article 19(5) of Consumer Protection Law, the businessman may be exempted from its duty, if it can proof that the damages suffered by the consumer is because of the consumer fault itself. Therefore, the businessman must prove that it did not commit any fault (shifting the burden of proof). The principle of shifting the burden of proof has adopted by Consumer Protection Law because the consumer has no suffi cient knowledge of materials, production process, and distribution process which done by the businessman regularly. The Consumer Protection Law has no clear provision on the implementation of shifting the burden of proof, while the same situation is also found in Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2006 concerning Appeal on the Judgment of BPSK. Thus, there are inconsistency implementations on the shifting of the burden of proof between on case by case. It depends on the comprehension knowledge of the judges. Such situation may lead to ineffective implementation of Consumer Protection Law.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114393149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Article 18 of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Rules of Agrarian states that “For the public interest, including the national and State interest also the peoples interest, land rights may be revoked with reasonable compensation in accordance to the procedure provided by law.” The phrase of “revoked” in the article can be widely interpreted both in terms of the procedure as well as the authority. A year after the enactment of Law No. 5 of 1960, Law No. 20 of 1961 concerning Revocation of Land Rights and Properties on Land was enacted with the purpose to implement Article 18 of Law No. 5 of 1960. According to Law No. 20 of 1961, revocation of land rights for the public interests can be exercised through Presidential Decree. It means that there is no opportunity for the lands owner to file an objection against the revocation. On the other side, the enactment of Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for Development in which Article 40 of the Law provides the custody mechanism for compensation to the District Court when the lands owner refuse to accept the compensation. The procedure has been confi rmed by Supreme Court, which enacted Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2016 concerning the Procedure for Submitting Objection and Compensation Custody to the District Court in Land Procurement for Public Interests. This situation shows confl ict of norms between Law No. 20 of 1961 which is never declared not applicable, and then Law No. 2 of 2012 was enacted as new law in the same field of regulation.
{"title":"CONFLICT OF NORM ANTARA PENCABUTAN HAK DAN PENITIPAN GANTI KERUGIAN DI PENGADILAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN","authors":"M. Masykur, Harinanto Sugiono","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.64","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.64","url":null,"abstract":"Article 18 of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Rules of Agrarian states that “For the public interest, including the national and State interest also the peoples interest, land rights may be revoked with reasonable compensation in accordance to the procedure provided by law.” The phrase of “revoked” in the article can be widely interpreted both in terms of the procedure as well as the authority. A year after the enactment of Law No. 5 of 1960, Law No. 20 of 1961 concerning Revocation of Land Rights and Properties on Land was enacted with the purpose to implement Article 18 of Law No. 5 of 1960. According to Law No. 20 of 1961, revocation of land rights for the public interests can be exercised through Presidential Decree. It means that there is no opportunity for the lands owner to file an objection against the revocation. On the other side, the enactment of Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for Development in which Article 40 of the Law provides the custody mechanism for compensation to the District Court when the lands owner refuse to accept the compensation. The procedure has been confi rmed by Supreme Court, which enacted Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2016 concerning the Procedure for Submitting Objection and Compensation Custody to the District Court in Land Procurement for Public Interests. This situation shows confl ict of norms between Law No. 20 of 1961 which is never declared not applicable, and then Law No. 2 of 2012 was enacted as new law in the same field of regulation.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"15 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132609274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Capital market sector is one of the financial services which quite dynamic in progress. Capital market transactions have varied characteristics and complexity. In its practices, many factors may motivate legal dispute in capital market in which mostly not settled in litigation way. The investors avoid settle their dispute through litigation mostly because of its formalistic procedure, time consume, and uncertainty of the result because of distrust against court system. The Indonesian Supreme Court has enacted Supreme Court Regulation No. 5 of 2015 concerning Small Claims Procedure as an effort to reform civil justice system which is simplify and expedite. The small claim procedure may offer dispute settlement which simple and quick, however it is limited with the claim value up to Rp200 millions, while mostly capital market transaction has greater value than Rp200 millions. This article will discuss the implementation of the small claims procedure in investor dispute settlement in the capital market. Moreover, this article also elaborates the advantages and disadvantages of small claims procedure in settling investor dispute as a protection to the consumer in capital market.
{"title":"IMPLEMENTASI GUGATAN SEDERHANA DALAM LITIGASI DI PASAR MODAL SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN (INVESTOR) PASAR MODAL INDONESIA","authors":"Ema Rahmawat","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.68","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I1.68","url":null,"abstract":"Capital market sector is one of the financial services which quite dynamic in progress. Capital market transactions have varied characteristics and complexity. In its practices, many factors may motivate legal dispute in capital market in which mostly not settled in litigation way. The investors avoid settle their dispute through litigation mostly because of its formalistic procedure, time consume, and uncertainty of the result because of distrust against court system. The Indonesian Supreme Court has enacted Supreme Court Regulation No. 5 of 2015 concerning Small Claims Procedure as an effort to reform civil justice system which is simplify and expedite. The small claim procedure may offer dispute settlement which simple and quick, however it is limited with the claim value up to Rp200 millions, while mostly capital market transaction has greater value than Rp200 millions. This article will discuss the implementation of the small claims procedure in investor dispute settlement in the capital market. Moreover, this article also elaborates the advantages and disadvantages of small claims procedure in settling investor dispute as a protection to the consumer in capital market.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114553705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In some countries, mediation was voluntarily dispute settlement. In banking dispute settlement, the dispute arose from customer’s claim over banking services. If the claim unsatisfactory settled, it may lead to banking dispute. The dispute characterized as contractual dispute between the bank and the customer as debtor. At fi rst stage, the customer may request for clarifi cation towards the bank. Subsequently, the customer may submit request for mediation to the mediation institution. If the parties (the bank and the customer) reach an agreement on the dispute, the agreement should be written. This article also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of mediation for banking dispute settlement.
{"title":"UPAYA MEDIASI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI LEMBAGA PERBANKAN","authors":"S. Suherman","doi":"10.35586/.V4I2.250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35586/.V4I2.250","url":null,"abstract":"In some countries, mediation was voluntarily dispute settlement. In banking dispute settlement, the dispute arose from customer’s claim over banking services. If the claim unsatisfactory settled, it may lead to banking dispute. The dispute characterized as contractual dispute between the bank and the customer as debtor. At fi rst stage, the customer may request for clarifi cation towards the bank. Subsequently, the customer may submit request for mediation to the mediation institution. If the parties (the bank and the customer) reach an agreement on the dispute, the agreement should be written. This article also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of mediation for banking dispute settlement.","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123636136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：