Pub Date : 2020-12-29DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1277
Marília Gehrke, Marcia Benetti
This paper discusses the use of Twitter as a news source, especially in data journalism. This practice uses public databases as sources for its investigations, but has now started to make use of less conventional sources, such as Twitter, which politicians now use as an official communication channel and thus avoid giving interviews to the press. In this study, we analyze news articles published over a period of a little less than two months by the data journalism team at Vortex Media. Our focus was on political coverage. Twitter may be classified as a reproductive or statistical documentary news sources, depending on the case. We argue that, by using this social networking site as a news source, data journalism could be able to provide new knowledge. Its limitations lie within the working order of the social network itself, which is highly mediated by algorithms and conditioned to spread disinformation. Este artigo discute o uso do Twitter como fonte, em especial no jornalismo guiado por dados. Conhecida por investigar a partir de bancos de dados publicos, esta pratica tem acessado fontes menos convencionais, a exemplo da plataforma, a medida que os politicos a tratam como canal oficial de comunicacao e evitam conceder entrevistas a imprensa. Neste estudo, analisamos noticias publicadas pela equipe de dados do site jornalistico Vortex Media em pouco menos de dois meses, observando que a cobertura politica se destaca nesse contexto. O Twitter pode ser classificado como fonte documental do tipo reproducao ou estatistica, dependendo do caso. Defendemos que o jornalismo guiado por dados tem potencial para promover conhecimento inedito a partir do uso desse site de rede social como fonte; suas limitacoes estao na propria condicao da rede, mediada por algoritmos e propicia para o espalhamento de desinformacao. Este articulo analiza el uso de Twitter como fuente, especialmente en el periodismo de datos. Conocido por investigar desde bases de datos publicas, esta practica ha accedido a fuentes menos convencionales, como la plataforma, ya que los politicos la tratan como un canal oficial de comunicacion y evitan dar entrevistas a la prensa. En este estudio, analizamos las noticias publicadas por el equipo de datos del sitio periodistico Vortex Media en poco menos de dos meses, senalando que la cobertura politica se destaca en este contexto. Twitter puede clasificarse como fuente documental reproductiva o estadistica, segun el caso. Argumentamos que el periodismo de datos tiene el potencial de promover el conocimiento sin precedentes del uso de este sitio de redes sociales como fuente; sus limitaciones estan en la condicion de esta red, mediada por algoritmos y propicia para la difusion de la desinformacion.
{"title":"Twitter as a News Source in Data Journalism","authors":"Marília Gehrke, Marcia Benetti","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1277","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the use of Twitter as a news source, especially in data journalism. This practice uses public databases as sources for its investigations, but has now started to make use of less conventional sources, such as Twitter, which politicians now use as an official communication channel and thus avoid giving interviews to the press. In this study, we analyze news articles published over a period of a little less than two months by the data journalism team at Vortex Media. Our focus was on political coverage. Twitter may be classified as a reproductive or statistical documentary news sources, depending on the case. We argue that, by using this social networking site as a news source, data journalism could be able to provide new knowledge. Its limitations lie within the working order of the social network itself, which is highly mediated by algorithms and conditioned to spread disinformation. Este artigo discute o uso do Twitter como fonte, em especial no jornalismo guiado por dados. Conhecida por investigar a partir de bancos de dados publicos, esta pratica tem acessado fontes menos convencionais, a exemplo da plataforma, a medida que os politicos a tratam como canal oficial de comunicacao e evitam conceder entrevistas a imprensa. Neste estudo, analisamos noticias publicadas pela equipe de dados do site jornalistico Vortex Media em pouco menos de dois meses, observando que a cobertura politica se destaca nesse contexto. O Twitter pode ser classificado como fonte documental do tipo reproducao ou estatistica, dependendo do caso. Defendemos que o jornalismo guiado por dados tem potencial para promover conhecimento inedito a partir do uso desse site de rede social como fonte; suas limitacoes estao na propria condicao da rede, mediada por algoritmos e propicia para o espalhamento de desinformacao. Este articulo analiza el uso de Twitter como fuente, especialmente en el periodismo de datos. Conocido por investigar desde bases de datos publicas, esta practica ha accedido a fuentes menos convencionales, como la plataforma, ya que los politicos la tratan como un canal oficial de comunicacion y evitan dar entrevistas a la prensa. En este estudio, analizamos las noticias publicadas por el equipo de datos del sitio periodistico Vortex Media en poco menos de dos meses, senalando que la cobertura politica se destaca en este contexto. Twitter puede clasificarse como fuente documental reproductiva o estadistica, segun el caso. Argumentamos que el periodismo de datos tiene el potencial de promover el conocimiento sin precedentes del uso de este sitio de redes sociales como fuente; sus limitaciones estan en la condicion de esta red, mediada por algoritmos y propicia para la difusion de la desinformacion.","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"410-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46942553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1306
A. Jurno, Carlos d’Andréa
Our objective in this paper is to present and discuss the complexification of the process of platformization of journalism by Facebook, triggered by the implementation of the Facebook Journalism Project (FJP), in January 2017. Since then, the platform has been associating itself with new and varied actors, expanding its fronts and positioning itself as a coordinator of activities related to journalistic institutions. At the same time, it continued to offer itself as an infrastructure for the development of journalistic products and businesses. Based on the Platform Studies and methodologically inspired by the Cartography of Controversies, we present the FJP and public demonstrations by journalists, researchers and other actors involved in its implementation. The diversification of partnerships, the inclusion of pedagogical actions, the renegotiation of prescriptive and normative dimensions that guide journalistic institutions, and the consolidation of the platform as an infrastructure are the main issues discussed at the conclusions.Nosso objetivo neste artigo é apresentar e discutir a complexificação do processo de plataformização do jornalismo pelo Facebook, a partir da implementação do Facebook Journalism Project (FJP), em janeiro de 2017. Desde então, a plataforma vem se associando a novos e variados atores, ampliando suas frentes de atuação e se posicionando como uma coordenadora de atividades relacionadas às instituições jornalísticas. Ao mesmo tempo, continuou a se oferecer como infraestrutura para o desenvolvimento dos produtos e negócios jornalísticos. Ancorados nos Estudos de Plataforma e inspirados metodologicamente na Cartografia das Controvérsias, apresentamos o FJP e manifestações públicas de jornalistas, pesquisadores e outros atores interessados em sua implementação. A diversificação das parcerias, a inclusão de ações pedagógicas, a renegociação das dimensões prescritivas e normativas que orientam as instituições jornalísticas, e a consolidação da plataforma como infraestrutura são algumas das questões discutidas ao final do artigo.Nuestro objetivo en este trabajo es presentar y discutir la complejización del proceso de plataformización de periodismo por parte de Facebook, a partir de la implementación del Facebook Journalism Project (FJP), en enero de 2017. Desde entonces, la plataforma se ha ido asociando con nuevos y variados actores, ampliando sus frentes y posicionándose como coordinadora de actividades relacionadas con las instituciones periodísticas. Al mismo tiempo, continuó ofreciéndose como infraestructura para el desarrollo de productos y negocios periodísticos. Basados en los Estudios de Plataforma e inspirados metodológicamente en la Cartografía de Controversias, presentamos el FJP y demostraciones públicas de periodistas, investigadores y otros actores interesados en su implementación. La diversificación de las alianzas, la inclusión de acciones pedagógicas, la renegociación de las dimensiones prescriptivas y normati
我们在本文中的目标是展示和讨论由2017年1月Facebook新闻项目(FJP)的实施引发的Facebook新闻平台化过程的复杂性。从那时起，该平台一直与新的和不同的参与者联系在一起，扩大其战线，并将自己定位为与新闻机构有关的活动的协调者。与此同时，它继续为新闻产品和业务的发展提供基础设施。基于《平台研究》和受《争议制图》启发的方法论，我们展示了FJP以及参与其实施的记者、研究人员和其他行动者的公开演示。结论中讨论的主要问题是伙伴关系的多样化、教学行动的纳入、指导新闻机构的规范性和规范性方面的重新谈判，以及将平台作为基础设施加以巩固。Nosso objetivo neste artigo e apresentar e discutir complexificacao processo de plataformizacao做jornalismo pelo Facebook,从da implementacao做Facebook新闻项目(FJP) em一月2017。Desde entao、组织se associando vem这个组织新生e ator的菜肴,ampliando为前面de atuacao e se posicionando科莫乌玛coordenadora de atividades relacionadas作为instituicoes jornalisticas。此外，我们还将继续使用基础设施，并将其应用到产品中，例如negócios jornalísticos。由自由贸易组织(FJP)、新闻工作者协会(manifestações públicas)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)、专家协会(FJP)。一个多样化的数据中心，一个包括数据中心ações pedagógicas，一个重新整合的数据中心dimensões，一个规范的面向未来的规范，一个整合的数据中心，一个基础设施的数据平台，一个数据中心questões，讨论了一个最终的数据中心。2017年1月1日，《新目标》(neestro objectivo en este trabajo)由讨论者la complejización del process de plataformización de periodismo porporte de Facebook，一个名为implementación del Facebook新闻项目(FJP)的参与者介绍。Desde entonces, la platform se, do association and do nuevas行动者，amplido sus frentes, como coordinadora de actividades，关系和机构periodísticas。2008年1月1日，continuó关于经济和社会发展的基础设施，通过谈判解决生产问题periodísticos。Basados en洛德组织e这个组织工厂化inspirados metodologicamente en la Cartografia de Controversias presentamos el FJP y demostraciones publica de periodistas investigadores其它演员苏implementacion interesados。La diversificación de las alianzas, La inclusión de acciones pedagógicas, La renegociación de las dimensionones prescritivas and normativas que orientan as instituiones periodísticas, La consolidación de platform forma como infrastruct son algunos de los temas distidos al final del artículo。
{"title":"Between Partnerships, Infrastructures and Products: Facebook Journalism Project and the Platformization of Journalism","authors":"A. Jurno, Carlos d’Andréa","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1306","url":null,"abstract":"Our objective in this paper is to present and discuss the complexification of the process of platformization of journalism by Facebook, triggered by the implementation of the Facebook Journalism Project (FJP), in January 2017. Since then, the platform has been associating itself with new and varied actors, expanding its fronts and positioning itself as a coordinator of activities related to journalistic institutions. At the same time, it continued to offer itself as an infrastructure for the development of journalistic products and businesses. Based on the Platform Studies and methodologically inspired by the Cartography of Controversies, we present the FJP and public demonstrations by journalists, researchers and other actors involved in its implementation. The diversification of partnerships, the inclusion of pedagogical actions, the renegotiation of prescriptive and normative dimensions that guide journalistic institutions, and the consolidation of the platform as an infrastructure are the main issues discussed at the conclusions.Nosso objetivo neste artigo é apresentar e discutir a complexificação do processo de plataformização do jornalismo pelo Facebook, a partir da implementação do Facebook Journalism Project (FJP), em janeiro de 2017. Desde então, a plataforma vem se associando a novos e variados atores, ampliando suas frentes de atuação e se posicionando como uma coordenadora de atividades relacionadas às instituições jornalísticas. Ao mesmo tempo, continuou a se oferecer como infraestrutura para o desenvolvimento dos produtos e negócios jornalísticos. Ancorados nos Estudos de Plataforma e inspirados metodologicamente na Cartografia das Controvérsias, apresentamos o FJP e manifestações públicas de jornalistas, pesquisadores e outros atores interessados em sua implementação. A diversificação das parcerias, a inclusão de ações pedagógicas, a renegociação das dimensões prescritivas e normativas que orientam as instituições jornalísticas, e a consolidação da plataforma como infraestrutura são algumas das questões discutidas ao final do artigo.Nuestro objetivo en este trabajo es presentar y discutir la complejización del proceso de plataformización de periodismo por parte de Facebook, a partir de la implementación del Facebook Journalism Project (FJP), en enero de 2017. Desde entonces, la plataforma se ha ido asociando con nuevos y variados actores, ampliando sus frentes y posicionándose como coordinadora de actividades relacionadas con las instituciones periodísticas. Al mismo tiempo, continuó ofreciéndose como infraestructura para el desarrollo de productos y negocios periodísticos. Basados en los Estudios de Plataforma e inspirados metodológicamente en la Cartografía de Controversias, presentamos el FJP y demostraciones públicas de periodistas, investigadores y otros actores interesados en su implementación. La diversificación de las alianzas, la inclusión de acciones pedagógicas, la renegociación de las dimensiones prescriptivas y normati","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47829994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-29DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1316
André Fagundes Pase, Gisele Noll, Mariana Gomes da Fontoura, Letícia Dallegrave
This article aims to understand the transformations caused by new informational ecosystems in contemporary journalism. This analysis is performed based on news accessed through personal digital assistants embedded in smart speakers. As a methodological procedure, it adopts a multiple case study, defining the vocal transactors of Google (Nest Home/Google Assistant) and Amazon (Echo/Alexa) as its object. Therefore, this paper notes that the inclusion of algorithmic routines and the extension of news content to intelligent voice interfaces requires adaptation for the personalization of information, an ecosystem that is feedback by traditional vehicles, journalists, and people who interact with the artifacts.O presente artigo tem como objetivo compreender as transformações causadas por novos ecossistemas informacionais no jornalismo contemporâneo. Essa análise é realizada a partir de notícias acessadas através de assistentes pessoais digitais embarcados em alto-falantes inteligentes. Como procedimento metodológico, adota o estudo de caso múltiplo, definindo como objeto os transatores vocais da Google (Nest Home/Google Assistant) e da Amazon (Echo/Alexa). Observa, portanto, que a inclusão de rotinas algorítmicas e a extensão de conteúdo noticioso para interfaces de voz inteligentes demanda adaptação para a personalização das informações, ecossistema que é retroalimentado por veículos tradicionais, jornalistas e pessoas que interagem com os artefatos.Este artículo tiene como objetivo comprender las transformaciones causadas por los nuevos ecosistemas informativos en el periodismo contemporáneo. Este análisis se realiza en función de las noticias a las que se accede a través de asistentes digitales personales integrados en altavoces inteligentes. Como procedimiento metodológico, adopta un estudio de caso múltiple, definiendo los transactores vocales de Google (Nest Home/Google Assistant) y Amazon (Echo/Alexa) como su objeto. Señala, por lo tanto, que la inclusión de rutinas algorítmicas y la extensión del contenido de noticias a interfaces de voz inteligentes requiere adaptación para la personalización de la información, un ecosistema que es retroalimentado por vehículos tradicionales, periodistas y personas que interactúan con los artefactos.
本文旨在了解新信息生态系统在当代新闻学中的变革。该分析是基于通过嵌入在智能扬声器中的个人数字助理访问的新闻进行的。作为一种方法论程序，它采用了多案例研究，将谷歌(Nest Home/谷歌Assistant)和亚马逊(Echo/Alexa)的语音交易器定义为其对象。因此，本文指出，将算法例程和新闻内容扩展到智能语音界面需要适应信息的个性化，这是一个由传统车辆、记者和与人工制品交互的人反馈的生态系统。因此，我们提出了一种新的综合目标，即transformações causadas por novos ecossistemas informacionis no jornalismo contemporneo。Essa análise realizada a partia de notícias accessadas as atravsamas as assistentassasses perssois digitasembarcados as alto falantes intellectual。Como程序到metodológico，采用estudo de caso múltiplo，定义Como对象到transatores语音数据库谷歌(Nest Home/谷歌Assistant)和亚马逊(Echo/Alexa)。Observa, portanto, inclusao de rotinas algoritmicas e extensao de conteudo noticioso对位接口de voz才华demanda adaptacao对位personalizacao das informacoes, ecossistema, e retroalimentado为什么veiculos tradicionais,小e萨姆,interagem com os artefatos。Este artículo tiene como目标:理解转型的原因是贫困的，新的生态系统是信息的，甚至是周期的，contemporáneo。Este análisis se realizizen función de las noticias as las noticias as las que as acede as acede as acede as acede as assistant(助理)、(数字)、(集成)、(集成)和(智能)。Como procedimiento metodológico，采用unestudio de caso múltiple，定义了comidolos transacres的谷歌(Nest Home/谷歌Assistant)和Amazon (Echo/Alexa)的Como su对象。运动太多,Senala公式rutinas包含algoritmicas y del contenido de la扩展新闻短片接口de voz才华requiere adaptacion对位la personalizacion de la给联合国ecosistema, es retroalimentado为什么vehiculos tradicionales, periodistas y角色,interactuan洛artefactos监狱。
{"title":"Who Controls the Voice? The Journalistic Use and the Informational Domain in Vocal Transactors","authors":"André Fagundes Pase, Gisele Noll, Mariana Gomes da Fontoura, Letícia Dallegrave","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n3.2021.1316","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to understand the transformations caused by new informational ecosystems in contemporary journalism. This analysis is performed based on news accessed through personal digital assistants embedded in smart speakers. As a methodological procedure, it adopts a multiple case study, defining the vocal transactors of Google (Nest Home/Google Assistant) and Amazon (Echo/Alexa) as its object. Therefore, this paper notes that the inclusion of algorithmic routines and the extension of news content to intelligent voice interfaces requires adaptation for the personalization of information, an ecosystem that is feedback by traditional vehicles, journalists, and people who interact with the artifacts.O presente artigo tem como objetivo compreender as transformações causadas por novos ecossistemas informacionais no jornalismo contemporâneo. Essa análise é realizada a partir de notícias acessadas através de assistentes pessoais digitais embarcados em alto-falantes inteligentes. Como procedimento metodológico, adota o estudo de caso múltiplo, definindo como objeto os transatores vocais da Google (Nest Home/Google Assistant) e da Amazon (Echo/Alexa). Observa, portanto, que a inclusão de rotinas algorítmicas e a extensão de conteúdo noticioso para interfaces de voz inteligentes demanda adaptação para a personalização das informações, ecossistema que é retroalimentado por veículos tradicionais, jornalistas e pessoas que interagem com os artefatos.Este artículo tiene como objetivo comprender las transformaciones causadas por los nuevos ecosistemas informativos en el periodismo contemporáneo. Este análisis se realiza en función de las noticias a las que se accede a través de asistentes digitales personales integrados en altavoces inteligentes. Como procedimiento metodológico, adopta un estudio de caso múltiple, definiendo los transactores vocales de Google (Nest Home/Google Assistant) y Amazon (Echo/Alexa) como su objeto. Señala, por lo tanto, que la inclusión de rutinas algorítmicas y la extensión del contenido de noticias a interfaces de voz inteligentes requiere adaptación para la personalización de la información, un ecosistema que es retroalimentado por vehículos tradicionales, periodistas y personas que interactúan con los artefactos.","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41772822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-31DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1257
Gabriel Rizzo Hoewell, A. Gruszynski
DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v16n2.2020.1257 ABSTRACT – The native digital newspaper Nexo is the empirical object of analysis of this study that aims to understand how its journalistic information is structured in terms of sections, themes, web potential, modalities, genres, and journalistic formats. The theoretical framework consists of the scenario of journalistic convergence, the structural changes and innovations associated with this convergence, and understanding the newspaper as a device, paying attention to the characteristics of cyberjournalism and how the newspaper was formed. The methodological procedures adopted are bibliographic and documentary researches and content analysis, which operationalize the evaluation of the corpus composed of materials collected in five spaces between September 11 and 24, 2017 sections of the website, home page, Facebook page, newsletters and articles. There is a new proposal for framing sections and themes; distinct approaches to periodicity, topicality, universality and advertising; multiplatform articulation; exploration of different modalities, formats and genres; adoption of hypertextuality and memory for explanatory journalism; and the use of multimedia and interactivity as alternatives for editorial innovation.
{"title":"SHAPING INFORMATION AT DIGITAL NATIVE NEXO IN THE SCENARIO OF JOURNALISTIC CONVERGENCE","authors":"Gabriel Rizzo Hoewell, A. Gruszynski","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1257","url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v16n2.2020.1257 ABSTRACT – The native digital newspaper Nexo is the empirical object of analysis of this study that aims to understand how its journalistic information is structured in terms of sections, themes, web potential, modalities, genres, and journalistic formats. The theoretical framework consists of the scenario of journalistic convergence, the structural changes and innovations associated with this convergence, and understanding the newspaper as a device, paying attention to the characteristics of cyberjournalism and how the newspaper was formed. The methodological procedures adopted are bibliographic and documentary researches and content analysis, which operationalize the evaluation of the corpus composed of materials collected in five spaces between September 11 and 24, 2017 sections of the website, home page, Facebook page, newsletters and articles. There is a new proposal for framing sections and themes; distinct approaches to periodicity, topicality, universality and advertising; multiplatform articulation; exploration of different modalities, formats and genres; adoption of hypertextuality and memory for explanatory journalism; and the use of multimedia and interactivity as alternatives for editorial innovation.","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"394-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48429425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-31DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1199
I. Paganotti, Leonardo Sakamoto, Rodrigo Pelegrini Ratier
DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v16n2.2020.1199 ABSTRACT – This paper analyzes the legal basis on which the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court (TSE) identified and removed content which it considered to be “fake news”. To accomplish this, we evaluate the argumentative strategy behind the first ruling which defined the jurisprudence, including allegations of corruption against then presidential candidate, Marina Silva (Rede party) in the 2018 presidential election. Analysis of this case shows that the legal system went to great efforts to legitimize this case in academic studies, but it appeared to be less concerned with the legal arguments as it only cited recent legal guidelines on the dissemination of fake news but did not provide further detail on them. Even though journalistic sources were included in the legal decision, the legal argument disregarded mainstream news reports.
{"title":"BETWEEN LEGALITY AND LEGITIMACY: differences and reasoning behind the TSE’s definition and blocking of “fake news”","authors":"I. Paganotti, Leonardo Sakamoto, Rodrigo Pelegrini Ratier","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1199","url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v16n2.2020.1199 ABSTRACT – This paper analyzes the legal basis on which the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court (TSE) identified and removed content which it considered to be “fake news”. To accomplish this, we evaluate the argumentative strategy behind the first ruling which defined the jurisprudence, including allegations of corruption against then presidential candidate, Marina Silva (Rede party) in the 2018 presidential election. Analysis of this case shows that the legal system went to great efforts to legitimize this case in academic studies, but it appeared to be less concerned with the legal arguments as it only cited recent legal guidelines on the dissemination of fake news but did not provide further detail on them. Even though journalistic sources were included in the legal decision, the legal argument disregarded mainstream news reports.","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"320-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42065710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-31DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1212
Daniel De Rezende Damasceno, Edgardo Patricio
Fact-checking was initially used to verify the factuality of information given by political agents. However, the proliferation of false information on social networks and concerns about the political use of spreading lies have led to fact-checking methodologies also being used to combat fake news. In terms of a cognitive and behavioral approach, Lazer et al. (2018) suggest there are some doubts as to how effective this methodology is. This article analyzes the performance of two Brazilian checking agencies, Aos Fatos and Agencia Lupa. We demonstrate that, although checking discourse is directly related to the credibility of organizations, the agencies themselves do not lay out the criteria for selecting what is to be checked. The platforms that use this form of fact-checking mainly rely on data and studies provided by official sources and public institutions, once again compromising the credibility of the process. A pratica de fact-checking foi iniciada para verificar a factualidade das informacoes nos discursos de agentes politicos. Mas a proliferacao de informacoes falsas nas redes sociais da internet, e a preocupacao com a disseminacao de mentiras como instrumento politico, fez com que as metodologias de fact-checking tambem fossem utilizadas para combater fake news. Levando em consideracao uma abordagem cognitiva e comportamental, Lazer et al. (2018) alertam que existem duvidas quanto a eficacia dessa utilizacao. Esse artigo analisa a atuacao de duas agencias brasileiras de checagem, Aos Fatos e Agencia Lupa. Demonstramos que, apesar da checagem de discursos ter relacao direta com a credibilidade das organizacoes, as proprias agencias nao explicitam os criterios que orientam a selecao do que e checado. E que nessa modalidade de checagem, as plataformas de fact-checking se valem, sobretudo, de dados e estudos fornecidos por fontes oficiais e instituicoes publicas, comprometendo mais uma vez a credibilidade do processo. La practica de fact-checking inicio para verificar la factualidad de las informaciones en los discursos de agentes politicos. Pero la proliferacion de informaciones falsas en las redes sociales de internet, y la preocupacion por la diseminacion de mentiras como instrumento politico, hizo que las metodologias de fact-checking tambien fueran utilizadas para combatir las fake news. Teniendo en cuenta un enfoque cognitivo y conductual, Lazer et al. (2018) advierten que existen dudas sobre la eficacia de esta utilizacion. Este articulo analiza la actuacion de dos agencias brasilenas de chequeo, Aos Fatos y Agencia Lupa. Demostramos que, aunque la verificacion del discurso tiene una relacion directa con la credibilidad de las organizaciones, las agencias mismas no detallan los criterios que guian la seleccion de lo que se verifica. Y que en este modo de verificacion, las plataformas de verificacion de hechos se basan principalmente en datos y estudios proporcionados por fuentes oficiales e instituciones publicas, comprometiendo una ve
事实检查最初用于核实政治行为者提供的信息的真实性。然而，社交网络上虚假信息的扩散和对政治利用散布谎言的关切导致事实检查方法也被用来打击虚假新闻。在认知和行为方法方面，Lazer等人。（2018年）对这种方法的有效性提出了一些疑问。本文分析了两个巴西检查机构AOS FATOS和Agencia Lupa的性能。我们表明，虽然检查话语与组织的信誉直接相关，但机构本身没有制定选择要检查的内容的标准。使用这种形式事实检查的平台主要依赖官方来源和公共机构提供的数据和研究，再次损害了这一进程的可信度。一项事实检查信仰的实践，旨在验证政治代理人的言论。更多的是虚假信息的扩散NAS社交网络提供了互联网，更多的是关注谎言作为一种政治工具的传播，而不是事实检查方法也被用来打击虚假新闻。Lazer等人（2018年）提出了Em Consideracao UMA认知和行为方法，警告说，Desa Usacao的有效性存在双重标准。埃塞·阿蒂戈（Esse Artigo）分析了巴西Checagem、AOS Fatos和放大镜机构的Atuacao。我们证明，Apesar da Checagem de Speeces Ter Relacao directa Com a Credibilidade das Organizacoes作为NAO自己的机构明确了指导Selecao do que和Checado的标准。e Nesa Modalidade de Checagem作为事实检查平台，是官方渠道和公共机构伪造的骰子、骰子和灰泥的价值、过度使用，使Mais Umavez成为可信的do processo。开始进行事实检查，以核实政治代理人演讲中信息的真实性。但互联网社交媒体上虚假信息的扩散，以及对谎言作为政治工具传播的担忧，使事实检查方法也被用来打击虚假新闻。考虑到认知和行为方法，Lazer等人。（2018年）警告说，对这种使用的有效性存在疑问。本文分析了巴西两个健康检查机构AOS FATOS和放大镜机构的表现。我们表明，虽然话语验证与组织的信誉有直接关系，但机构本身并没有详细说明指导选择被验证内容的标准。在这种核查模式下，事实核查平台主要基于官方来源和公共机构提供的数据和研究，再次损害了这一进程的可信度。
{"title":"JOURNALISM AND FACT-CHECKING: typification of sources used for checking and criteria for selecting fact-checked material – an analysis by Agência Lupa and Aos Fatos","authors":"Daniel De Rezende Damasceno, Edgardo Patricio","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1212","url":null,"abstract":"Fact-checking was initially used to verify the factuality of information given by political agents. However, the proliferation of false information on social networks and concerns about the political use of spreading lies have led to fact-checking methodologies also being used to combat fake news. In terms of a cognitive and behavioral approach, Lazer et al. (2018) suggest there are some doubts as to how effective this methodology is. This article analyzes the performance of two Brazilian checking agencies, Aos Fatos and Agencia Lupa. We demonstrate that, although checking discourse is directly related to the credibility of organizations, the agencies themselves do not lay out the criteria for selecting what is to be checked. The platforms that use this form of fact-checking mainly rely on data and studies provided by official sources and public institutions, once again compromising the credibility of the process. A pratica de fact-checking foi iniciada para verificar a factualidade das informacoes nos discursos de agentes politicos. Mas a proliferacao de informacoes falsas nas redes sociais da internet, e a preocupacao com a disseminacao de mentiras como instrumento politico, fez com que as metodologias de fact-checking tambem fossem utilizadas para combater fake news. Levando em consideracao uma abordagem cognitiva e comportamental, Lazer et al. (2018) alertam que existem duvidas quanto a eficacia dessa utilizacao. Esse artigo analisa a atuacao de duas agencias brasileiras de checagem, Aos Fatos e Agencia Lupa. Demonstramos que, apesar da checagem de discursos ter relacao direta com a credibilidade das organizacoes, as proprias agencias nao explicitam os criterios que orientam a selecao do que e checado. E que nessa modalidade de checagem, as plataformas de fact-checking se valem, sobretudo, de dados e estudos fornecidos por fontes oficiais e instituicoes publicas, comprometendo mais uma vez a credibilidade do processo. La practica de fact-checking inicio para verificar la factualidad de las informaciones en los discursos de agentes politicos. Pero la proliferacion de informaciones falsas en las redes sociales de internet, y la preocupacion por la diseminacion de mentiras como instrumento politico, hizo que las metodologias de fact-checking tambien fueran utilizadas para combatir las fake news. Teniendo en cuenta un enfoque cognitivo y conductual, Lazer et al. (2018) advierten que existen dudas sobre la eficacia de esta utilizacion. Este articulo analiza la actuacion de dos agencias brasilenas de chequeo, Aos Fatos y Agencia Lupa. Demostramos que, aunque la verificacion del discurso tiene una relacion directa con la credibilidad de las organizaciones, las agencias mismas no detallan los criterios que guian la seleccion de lo que se verifica. Y que en este modo de verificacion, las plataformas de verificacion de hechos se basan principalmente en datos y estudios proporcionados por fuentes oficiales e instituciones publicas, comprometiendo una ve","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"368-393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45379691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-31DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1168
E. Minga
DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v16n2.2020.1168 ABSTRACT – In the beginning of this century, the human trafficking received wide attention in Portugal, which developed several actions to reinforce the legislation in this area. Not by coincidence, this attention is contemporary with the consolidation of the country as a receiver place, which indicates its inextricable relation with migration phenomenon. In this article, we purpose to analyze the representation of human trafficking for sexual exploitation – one of the most prominent vectors of this criminal practice –, in the journalistic discourse about Brazilian women immigrant’s prostitution. However, the Brazilian woman’s image that emerged in the news about prostitution, following the “Mothers of Bragança” case, in 2003, privileged the stereotyping, put in the background issues about trafficking and exploitation (Correia, 2014). Analyzing some texts of Público and Expresso newspapers published during these years, we observe an erratic route which sometimes privileges a sensational tone, and sometimes pay attention to the exploitation and trafficking issues, reflecting in this way the inconsistency found in the law about the theme.
{"title":"TRAFFICKING AND PROSTITUTION OF BRAZILIAN WOMEN IN PORTUGAL: the journalistic discourse between the stereotyping and the victimization","authors":"E. Minga","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1168","url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v16n2.2020.1168 ABSTRACT – In the beginning of this century, the human trafficking received wide attention in Portugal, which developed several actions to reinforce the legislation in this area. Not by coincidence, this attention is contemporary with the consolidation of the country as a receiver place, which indicates its inextricable relation with migration phenomenon. In this article, we purpose to analyze the representation of human trafficking for sexual exploitation – one of the most prominent vectors of this criminal practice –, in the journalistic discourse about Brazilian women immigrant’s prostitution. However, the Brazilian woman’s image that emerged in the news about prostitution, following the “Mothers of Bragança” case, in 2003, privileged the stereotyping, put in the background issues about trafficking and exploitation (Correia, 2014). Analyzing some texts of Público and Expresso newspapers published during these years, we observe an erratic route which sometimes privileges a sensational tone, and sometimes pay attention to the exploitation and trafficking issues, reflecting in this way the inconsistency found in the law about the theme.","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"292-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42467879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-31DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1272
F. Rüdiger, Otávio Daros
A pioneer figure in the field, José Marques de Melo gained justified fame in journalism studies in Brazil, without elaborating upon a systematic reflection on the subject. In this article, we proceed to the rational reconstruction of what would be his journalism theory, in order to develop a critical judgment about its intellectual meaning and epistemological limits. We argue that his ideas are part of what will be referred to here as liberal-developmentalism. In conclusion, we affirm that the lack of greater scientific and intellectual resonance in his work is the result of the incompatibilities and contradictions of this kind of thinking with the historical formation of Brazilian society.
JoséMarques de Melo是该领域的先驱人物，他在巴西的新闻研究中获得了合理的声誉，但没有详细说明对这一主题的系统反思。在这篇文章中，我们对他的新闻学理论进行了理性的重建，以期对其知识意义和认识论局限性做出批判性的判断。我们认为，他的思想是自由发展主义的一部分。最后，我们确认，他的作品缺乏更大的科学和智力共鸣，是这种思想与巴西社会历史形成不兼容和矛盾的结果。
{"title":"CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JOSÉ MARQUES DE MELO’S JOURNALISTIC THINKING","authors":"F. Rüdiger, Otávio Daros","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1272","url":null,"abstract":"A pioneer figure in the field, José Marques de Melo gained justified fame in journalism studies in Brazil, without elaborating upon a systematic reflection on the subject. In this article, we proceed to the rational reconstruction of what would be his journalism theory, in order to develop a critical judgment about its intellectual meaning and epistemological limits. We argue that his ideas are part of what will be referred to here as liberal-developmentalism. In conclusion, we affirm that the lack of greater scientific and intellectual resonance in his work is the result of the incompatibilities and contradictions of this kind of thinking with the historical formation of Brazilian society.","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"232-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47119748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-31DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1265
Ébida Santos, L. Guazina
This article aims to discuss quality issues in political journalism from six Brazilian newspapers and their coverage of Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment process in 2016. We analyzed three major national newspapers (Folha de S. Paulo, O Globo, and Estado de S. Paulo) and three regional newspapers (A Tarde, O Liberal and Zero Hora). To do this we applied the methodology adapted from the Journalistic Added Value (VAP) together with quantitative and qualitative analyses. The study reveals the main quality issues in news coverage to be: the influence sources had on selecting which issues would be reported on; the lack of thematic diversity; the officialism of the sources; and the lack of time constraints on post-impeachment.
本文旨在讨论巴西六家报纸的政治新闻质量问题，以及它们对2016年Dilma Rousseff弹劾程序的报道。我们分析了三家主要的全国性报纸（Folha de S.Paulo、O Globo和Estado de S.Paula）和三家地区性报纸（A Tarde、O Liberal和Zero Hora）。为此，我们采用了改编自新闻附加值（VAP）的方法，并进行了定量和定性分析。该研究揭示了新闻报道的主要质量问题：来源对选择报道哪些问题的影响；主题缺乏多样性；来源的官方主义；以及弹劾后缺乏时间限制。
{"title":"QUALITY ISSUES IN NEWS COVERAGE OF DILMA ROUSSEFF’S IMPEACHMENT: an analysis of six Brazilian newspapers","authors":"Ébida Santos, L. Guazina","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1265","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to discuss quality issues in political journalism from six Brazilian newspapers and their coverage of Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment process in 2016. We analyzed three major national newspapers (Folha de S. Paulo, O Globo, and Estado de S. Paulo) and three regional newspapers (A Tarde, O Liberal and Zero Hora). To do this we applied the methodology adapted from the Journalistic Added Value (VAP) together with quantitative and qualitative analyses. The study reveals the main quality issues in news coverage to be: the influence sources had on selecting which issues would be reported on; the lack of thematic diversity; the officialism of the sources; and the lack of time constraints on post-impeachment.","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"342-367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46993257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-31DOI: 10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1255
M. Azpíroz
The cultivation and consumption of transgenic foods is a subject of global debate. Given that Argentina and Brazil are the world’s largest producers of genetically modified crops after the United States, this article aims to explore the international controversy surrounding GM crops and its coverage in leading newspapers in these two countries. It aims to verify whether the press exercised its social function as an independent observer or if other interests influenced its coverage. For this, it includes a deductive content analysis of Clarin and Folha de Sao Paulo’s coverage of GM crops from 2016 to 2018. It concludes that Clarin’s coverage was more clearly pro-transgenic than that of Folha de Sao Paulo, which could be attributed to greater presence of protransgenic sources at Clarin, in addition to historical and economic factors that could have influenced the way these newspapers covered transgenic topics. O cultivo e consumo de alimentos transgenicos e objeto de debate global. Tendo em vista que, depois dos Estados Unidos, Argentina e Brasil serem os maiores produtores mundiais de culturas geneticamente modificadas, este artigo tem como objetivo explorar a controversia internacional em torno das culturas GM e seu reflexo na comunicacao dos principais jornais desses dois paises. O objetivo e verificar se a imprensa exerceu a funcao social que lhe foi atribuida ou se atuou influenciada por outros interesses. Para isso, realiza uma analise do conteudo do tipo dedutivo da cobertura de transgenicos dos jornais Clarin e Folha em S. Paulo, no periodo 2016–2018. Conclui-se que a comunicacao de Clarin foi mais claramente pro-transgenica do que a Folha de S. Paulo, o que pode ser atribuido a maior presenca de fontes pro-transgenicas em Clarin, alem de fatores historicos e economicos que podem influenciar as diferentes coberturas oferecido pelos dois jornais. El cultivo y consumo de alimentos transgenicos es objeto de debate a nivel global. Teniendo en cuenta que, tras Estados Unidos, Argentina y Brasil son los mayores productores mundiales de cultivos geneticamente modificados, este articulo tiene como objetivo explorar la polemica internacional en torno a los transgenicos y su reflejo en la comunicacion de diarios lideres de estos dos paises. Se busca comprobar si la prensa ejercio la funcion social que se le atribuye o si actuo influida por otros intereses. Para ello se realiza un analisis de contenido de tipo deductivo de la cobertura sobre transgenicos de los diarios Clarin y Folha de Sao Paulo, durante el periodo 2016-2018. Se concluye que la comunicacion de Clarin fue mas claramente pro-transgenica que la de Folha de Sao Paulo, lo que podria atribuirse a la mayor presencia de fuentes pro-transgenicas en Clarin, ademas de factores historicos y economicos que pudieron influir en la distinta cobertura ofrecida por parte de los dos diarios.
转基因食品的种植和消费是全球争论的主题。鉴于阿根廷和巴西是仅次于美国的世界上最大的转基因作物生产国，本文旨在探讨围绕转基因作物的国际争议及其在这两个国家主要报纸上的报道。它的目的是核实新闻界是否行使了作为独立观察员的社会职能，或者是否有其他利益影响其报道。为此，它包括对Clarin和Folha de Sao Paulo从2016年到2018年对转基因作物的报道的演绎内容分析。它的结论是Clarin的报道比Folha de Sao Paulo的报道更明显地支持转基因，这可以归因于Clarin有更多的支持转基因的消息来源，除了历史和经济因素可能影响这些报纸报道转基因主题的方式。种植和消费转基因食品是全球争论的焦点。腱em vista, depois dos美国,阿根廷e巴西serem os星座produtores mundiais德文化geneticamente modificadas,埃斯特artigo tem科莫objetivo explorar controversia国际队em torno das文化通用e seu reflexo na comunicacao dos principais jornais一部分必须派斯。目的:通过对社会职能的实践，验证社会职能对社会责任的影响和对外部利益的影响。Para isso, realizuma分析do conteudo do tippo debertivo de conbertura de transgenicos os journal of Clarin e Folha em S. Paulo, no periodo 2016-2018。Conclui-se, comunicacao de Clarin信息自由但是claramente pro-transgenica做什么Folha de s .保罗o,颇得ser atribuido星座presenca德丰特斯pro-transgenicas em Clarin尽管阿兰德因子historicos e期中,podem influenciar作为不同cobertura oferecido pelos必须jornais。在全球范围内，转基因食品的种植和消费一直是争论的焦点。Teniendo en东西,tra利用美国、阿根廷y巴西儿子洛至少productores mundiales de cultivos geneticamente modificados,埃斯特危象如果科莫objetivo explorar en la polemica国际队torno洛transgenicos y苏一样均出自同一名设计师reflejo en la手de diario lideres de来说dos派斯。这些基本要素是指社会功能、社会特征、社会属性、社会实际影响和社会利益。Para ello se realiza de conbertura de conbertura de de tipo deltivo de la cobertura sobergenicos de los diarios de Sao Paulo, durante el periodo 2016-2018。我们总结了克拉林的沟通方式，我们总结了克拉林的转基因促进方式，我们总结了克拉林的转基因促进方式，我们总结了克拉林的转基因促进方式，我们总结了克拉林的转基因促进方式，我们总结了克拉林的历史因素，我们总结了克拉林的经济因素，我们总结了克拉林的转基因促进方式，我们总结了克拉林的转基因促进方式，我们总结了克拉林的转基因促进方式。
{"title":"THE DEBATE SURROUNDING GM CROPS IN SOUTH AMERICA AND ITS COVERAGE IN THE NEWSPAPERS CLARÍN AND FOLHA DE S. PAULO FROM 2016 – 2018","authors":"M. Azpíroz","doi":"10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v16n2.2020.1255","url":null,"abstract":"The cultivation and consumption of transgenic foods is a subject of global debate. Given that Argentina and Brazil are the world’s largest producers of genetically modified crops after the United States, this article aims to explore the international controversy surrounding GM crops and its coverage in leading newspapers in these two countries. It aims to verify whether the press exercised its social function as an independent observer or if other interests influenced its coverage. For this, it includes a deductive content analysis of Clarin and Folha de Sao Paulo’s coverage of GM crops from 2016 to 2018. It concludes that Clarin’s coverage was more clearly pro-transgenic than that of Folha de Sao Paulo, which could be attributed to greater presence of protransgenic sources at Clarin, in addition to historical and economic factors that could have influenced the way these newspapers covered transgenic topics. O cultivo e consumo de alimentos transgenicos e objeto de debate global. Tendo em vista que, depois dos Estados Unidos, Argentina e Brasil serem os maiores produtores mundiais de culturas geneticamente modificadas, este artigo tem como objetivo explorar a controversia internacional em torno das culturas GM e seu reflexo na comunicacao dos principais jornais desses dois paises. O objetivo e verificar se a imprensa exerceu a funcao social que lhe foi atribuida ou se atuou influenciada por outros interesses. Para isso, realiza uma analise do conteudo do tipo dedutivo da cobertura de transgenicos dos jornais Clarin e Folha em S. Paulo, no periodo 2016–2018. Conclui-se que a comunicacao de Clarin foi mais claramente pro-transgenica do que a Folha de S. Paulo, o que pode ser atribuido a maior presenca de fontes pro-transgenicas em Clarin, alem de fatores historicos e economicos que podem influenciar as diferentes coberturas oferecido pelos dois jornais. El cultivo y consumo de alimentos transgenicos es objeto de debate a nivel global. Teniendo en cuenta que, tras Estados Unidos, Argentina y Brasil son los mayores productores mundiales de cultivos geneticamente modificados, este articulo tiene como objetivo explorar la polemica internacional en torno a los transgenicos y su reflejo en la comunicacion de diarios lideres de estos dos paises. Se busca comprobar si la prensa ejercio la funcion social que se le atribuye o si actuo influida por otros intereses. Para ello se realiza un analisis de contenido de tipo deductivo de la cobertura sobre transgenicos de los diarios Clarin y Folha de Sao Paulo, durante el periodo 2016-2018. Se concluye que la comunicacion de Clarin fue mas claramente pro-transgenica que la de Folha de Sao Paulo, lo que podria atribuirse a la mayor presencia de fuentes pro-transgenicas en Clarin, ademas de factores historicos y economicos que pudieron influir en la distinta cobertura ofrecida por parte de los dos diarios.","PeriodicalId":42816,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journalism Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"264-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47554118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：