Pub Date : 2021-06-01DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1935120
Tin Aung Kyaw, Christine Fok, R. Teh, S. Tin, E. Williams, M. McAuliffe, G. Searchfield
ABSTRACT This study reveals the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on self-reported social isolation in a group of hearing-impaired New Zealanders aged 65 years and over. An online questionnaire based on the modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (mMOS-SS) was administered as an adjunct to an ongoing hearing aid trial (the CogniAid Trial) from May to June 2020. Total mMOS-SS and subscale scores (instrumental and emotional support) referring to both before and following COVID-19 lockdown (March to June 2020) were compared. A total of 135 participants from the CogniAid Trial were invited through emails to participate in this online survey; four mails failed to deliver. Among 131 participants, 76 responded, and 46 completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 30%. Twenty-six per cent of the participants reported decreased total and emotional support scores following the lockdown, and about 18% reported a decreased instrumental support score. Generalized linear factorial models for ordinary logistic regression revealed that older age was a significant predictor of decreased instrumental support score [adjusted OR: 1.15 (1.00–1.32)] after controlling for age, gender, duration of hearing problem, current hearing aid use, living arrangement, and physical activity status. No significant association was found between COVID-19 lockdown on social support status and gender, ethnicity, education level, having paid work, unpaid or volunteer work and depression status; however, an association was found between the lockdown and both marital status and living arrangement amongst a group of older New Zealanders.
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on social support status among older New Zealanders with hearing impairment","authors":"Tin Aung Kyaw, Christine Fok, R. Teh, S. Tin, E. Williams, M. McAuliffe, G. Searchfield","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1935120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1935120","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study reveals the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on self-reported social isolation in a group of hearing-impaired New Zealanders aged 65 years and over. An online questionnaire based on the modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (mMOS-SS) was administered as an adjunct to an ongoing hearing aid trial (the CogniAid Trial) from May to June 2020. Total mMOS-SS and subscale scores (instrumental and emotional support) referring to both before and following COVID-19 lockdown (March to June 2020) were compared. A total of 135 participants from the CogniAid Trial were invited through emails to participate in this online survey; four mails failed to deliver. Among 131 participants, 76 responded, and 46 completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 30%. Twenty-six per cent of the participants reported decreased total and emotional support scores following the lockdown, and about 18% reported a decreased instrumental support score. Generalized linear factorial models for ordinary logistic regression revealed that older age was a significant predictor of decreased instrumental support score [adjusted OR: 1.15 (1.00–1.32)] after controlling for age, gender, duration of hearing problem, current hearing aid use, living arrangement, and physical activity status. No significant association was found between COVID-19 lockdown on social support status and gender, ethnicity, education level, having paid work, unpaid or volunteer work and depression status; however, an association was found between the lockdown and both marital status and living arrangement amongst a group of older New Zealanders.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88832015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-19DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1926626
Mary Coyne, J. Regan
ABSTRACT This study aimed to (a) identify characteristics of dysphagia research receiving online attention; (b) determine associations between altmetric scores and traditional research metrics; (c) establish differences in altmetric scores between open access and closed access research and funded and non-funded research. Altmetric Explorer was searched on 7th October 2019 to identify contemporary (January 2014 to January 2019) articles with the keyword ‘dysphagia’. Data from 100 articles with the highest Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) were exported for analysis. Data extracted included journal name; first author profession; country; study design; population studied; publication year; journal impact factor; citations; downloads; funding and access status. Most of the 100 articles (AAS 19–317) focused on adult populations (95%). Nearly half of study designs were systematic reviews (27%) or randomized control trials (18%). The Dysphagia journal published the most articles (34%) and nearly one-third of first authors (31%) were based in USA. The most studied population was neurological (30%). There was no association between altmetric scores and traditional metrics. A significant difference in altmetric scores (U = 650.50, p = 0.045, p < 0.05) was found between the earlier time-period (2014–2016) (median AAS = 29) and later time-period (2016–2019) (median AAS=36). A significant difference in altmetric scores was identified between open (median = 33) and non-open access research (median = 29) (U = 1030.50, p = 0.048). Altmetric scores provide an innovative article level metric capturing public interest in dysphagia research. As altmetric scores do not correlate with traditional metrics, improved understanding of the type of dysphagia research that has social impact is imperative to guide researchers and clinicians.
本研究旨在(a)识别在线关注的吞咽困难研究的特征;(b)确定替代评分与传统研究指标之间的关联;(c)建立开放获取与封闭获取研究以及资助与非资助研究之间的替代得分差异。我们于2019年10月7日对Altmetric Explorer进行了搜索，以确定当代(2014年1月至2019年1月)的关键词为“吞咽困难”的文章。导出100篇另类注意力评分(AAS)最高的文章数据进行分析。提取的数据包括期刊名称;第一作者职业;国家;研究设计;人口研究;出版;期刊影响因子;引用;下载;资金和准入状况。100篇文章(AAS 19-317)中大部分集中在成人人群(95%)。近一半的研究设计是系统评价(27%)或随机对照试验(18%)。《吞咽困难》杂志发表的文章最多(34%)，近三分之一的第一作者(31%)来自美国。研究最多的人群是神经系统(30%)。另类评分和传统评分之间没有关联。早期(2014-2016年)和后期(2016-2019年)的替代计量评分差异有统计学意义(U = 650.50, p = 0.045, p < 0.05)(中位AAS= 29)。在开放获取研究(中位数= 33)和非开放获取研究(中位数= 29)之间，altmetric得分存在显著差异(U = 1030.50, p = 0.048)。Altmetric分数提供了一个创新的文章级度量，捕捉公众对吞咽困难研究的兴趣。由于替代评分与传统指标不相关，因此提高对具有社会影响的吞咽困难研究类型的理解对于指导研究人员和临床医生是必要的。
{"title":"Measuring the social impact of contemporary dysphagia research: an altmetric analysis","authors":"Mary Coyne, J. Regan","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1926626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1926626","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aimed to (a) identify characteristics of dysphagia research receiving online attention; (b) determine associations between altmetric scores and traditional research metrics; (c) establish differences in altmetric scores between open access and closed access research and funded and non-funded research. Altmetric Explorer was searched on 7th October 2019 to identify contemporary (January 2014 to January 2019) articles with the keyword ‘dysphagia’. Data from 100 articles with the highest Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) were exported for analysis. Data extracted included journal name; first author profession; country; study design; population studied; publication year; journal impact factor; citations; downloads; funding and access status. Most of the 100 articles (AAS 19–317) focused on adult populations (95%). Nearly half of study designs were systematic reviews (27%) or randomized control trials (18%). The Dysphagia journal published the most articles (34%) and nearly one-third of first authors (31%) were based in USA. The most studied population was neurological (30%). There was no association between altmetric scores and traditional metrics. A significant difference in altmetric scores (U = 650.50, p = 0.045, p < 0.05) was found between the earlier time-period (2014–2016) (median AAS = 29) and later time-period (2016–2019) (median AAS=36). A significant difference in altmetric scores was identified between open (median = 33) and non-open access research (median = 29) (U = 1030.50, p = 0.048). Altmetric scores provide an innovative article level metric capturing public interest in dysphagia research. As altmetric scores do not correlate with traditional metrics, improved understanding of the type of dysphagia research that has social impact is imperative to guide researchers and clinicians.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83051447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-19DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1927591
Jesús Valero-García, L. Iglesias, N. Silvestre
ABSTRACT Theory of Mind (ToM) is a crucial factor in the social integration of the elderly. Nonetheless, there has been a dearth of research into the relationship between ToM and presbycusis, even though presbycusis is a very common pathology among people over 65 years of age. The aim of this study is to analyze the functioning of the two types of ToM (affective and cognitive ToM) in aging populations, as well as to examine the components of ToM connected to ironic language, all in order to determine whether people with presbycusis show a similar ToM profile to those without any hearing loss. The sample consisted of 69 participants with a mean age of 75. Of the participants, 52 had some degree of hearing loss. Some participants with hearing loss used a hearing aid. All participants were asked to complete six ToM tasks. The results show that age influences ToM scores, especially for cognitive and irony recognition tasks. This decline in ToM was greater in participants experiencing mild cognitive impairment and also among those with hearing loss. Among participants with presbycusis, those who used a hearing aid obtained better results than those who did not. Gender and sociocultural background were not found to be significant variables. The results point to a need to monitor both hearing and cognitive abilities, especially those related to ToM, and to offer specific treatment whenever possible to avoid social alienation.
{"title":"Theory of Mind and its relation to presbycusis. A pilot study","authors":"Jesús Valero-García, L. Iglesias, N. Silvestre","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1927591","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1927591","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Theory of Mind (ToM) is a crucial factor in the social integration of the elderly. Nonetheless, there has been a dearth of research into the relationship between ToM and presbycusis, even though presbycusis is a very common pathology among people over 65 years of age. The aim of this study is to analyze the functioning of the two types of ToM (affective and cognitive ToM) in aging populations, as well as to examine the components of ToM connected to ironic language, all in order to determine whether people with presbycusis show a similar ToM profile to those without any hearing loss. The sample consisted of 69 participants with a mean age of 75. Of the participants, 52 had some degree of hearing loss. Some participants with hearing loss used a hearing aid. All participants were asked to complete six ToM tasks. The results show that age influences ToM scores, especially for cognitive and irony recognition tasks. This decline in ToM was greater in participants experiencing mild cognitive impairment and also among those with hearing loss. Among participants with presbycusis, those who used a hearing aid obtained better results than those who did not. Gender and sociocultural background were not found to be significant variables. The results point to a need to monitor both hearing and cognitive abilities, especially those related to ToM, and to offer specific treatment whenever possible to avoid social alienation.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82846056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-16DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1926620
B. Jackson, Leanne Turner, Georgina L. Kevany, S. Purdy
ABSTRACT In 2013, Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) was introduced as a new diagnosis. Prior 2013 there was great variability in professionals’ understanding of children’s food intake. Children with a restricted intake of food had limited recognition amongst health services, which the ARFID diagnosis aimed to change. Over time, it is useful to evaluate whether the formulation of this eating disorder has improved understanding of food refusal or ‘picky eating’ to ultimately enable effective outcomes for children and their families. This study explored changes in perspective from 2013 to 2018 regarding understanding of picky eating amongst health professionals (medical practitioners, dietitians and speech-language therapists) working with children and feeding difficulties in New Zealand. An online survey conducted in 2013 and 2018 targeted understanding of food refusal and consensus within the medical field for the labelling of picky eating. Responses were analysed with descriptive statistics, and qualitative content analysis. Health professionals in both years reported there was no consensus in the labelling of picky eating, with a significant increase in those reporting ‘no consensus’ in 2018 (n = 141, p = .035). However, health professionals demonstrated an increased awareness from 2013, by seeking further information regarding labelling of the condition portrayed. Despite an increase in awareness since 2013, health professionals are yet to agree on the diagnosis and treatment of ARFID. The impact of picky eating on parental stress may be underestimated in the literature. Consensus and guidelines are necessary to support health professionals, individuals and their families to obtain necessary services and resources.
2013年，回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)作为一种新的诊断被引入。2013年之前，专业人士对儿童食物摄入量的理解存在很大差异。食物摄入受限的儿童在卫生服务部门的认可度有限，ARFID的诊断旨在改变这一点。随着时间的推移，评估这种饮食失调的形成是否提高了对拒绝食物或“挑食”的理解，从而最终为儿童及其家庭带来有效的结果，是有用的。这项研究探讨了从2013年到2018年，在新西兰与儿童一起工作的健康专业人员(医生、营养师和语言治疗师)对挑食的理解和喂养困难方面的变化。2013年和2018年进行的一项在线调查针对的是对拒食的理解和医学领域对挑食标签的共识。采用描述性统计和定性内容分析对反应进行分析。这两年的卫生专业人员都报告说，在挑食的标签上没有达成共识，2018年报告“没有达成共识”的人数显著增加(n = 141, p = 0.035)。然而，自2013年以来，卫生专业人员通过寻求有关所描述病症标签的进一步信息，表现出了更高的认识。尽管自2013年以来认识有所提高，但卫生专业人员尚未就ARFID的诊断和治疗达成一致。挑食对父母压力的影响在文献中可能被低估了。为了支持卫生专业人员、个人及其家庭获得必要的服务和资源，共识和准则是必要的。
{"title":"Five years of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: no consensus of understanding among health professionals in New Zealand","authors":"B. Jackson, Leanne Turner, Georgina L. Kevany, S. Purdy","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1926620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1926620","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2013, Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) was introduced as a new diagnosis. Prior 2013 there was great variability in professionals’ understanding of children’s food intake. Children with a restricted intake of food had limited recognition amongst health services, which the ARFID diagnosis aimed to change. Over time, it is useful to evaluate whether the formulation of this eating disorder has improved understanding of food refusal or ‘picky eating’ to ultimately enable effective outcomes for children and their families. This study explored changes in perspective from 2013 to 2018 regarding understanding of picky eating amongst health professionals (medical practitioners, dietitians and speech-language therapists) working with children and feeding difficulties in New Zealand. An online survey conducted in 2013 and 2018 targeted understanding of food refusal and consensus within the medical field for the labelling of picky eating. Responses were analysed with descriptive statistics, and qualitative content analysis. Health professionals in both years reported there was no consensus in the labelling of picky eating, with a significant increase in those reporting ‘no consensus’ in 2018 (n = 141, p = .035). However, health professionals demonstrated an increased awareness from 2013, by seeking further information regarding labelling of the condition portrayed. Despite an increase in awareness since 2013, health professionals are yet to agree on the diagnosis and treatment of ARFID. The impact of picky eating on parental stress may be underestimated in the literature. Consensus and guidelines are necessary to support health professionals, individuals and their families to obtain necessary services and resources.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85683428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-12DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923304
Elaine Yandeau, Brenda Carey, M. Onslow
ABSTRACT The Lidcombe Program (Onslow et al., 2020) is a treatment designed for pre-school children who stutter. To date, there has been no published account from a child of early stuttering experiences with Lidcombe Program treatment. Such an account may (1) inform clinicians when they are considering the timing of intervention, (2) assist with the choice of a treatment, and (3) provide resources to supplement treatment with the Lidcombe Program. Consequently, this report is a record of separate interviews with a child and parent about their Lidcombe Program treatment experience, seven years after the conclusion of successful treatment. It is intended that this report and the accompanying video interview in the supplemental material can be a useful resource for clinicians when considering Lidcombe Program treatment.
Lidcombe Program (Onslow et al.， 2020)是一种针对学龄前口吃儿童的治疗方法。到目前为止，还没有发表过关于儿童早期接受利德库姆项目治疗的口吃经历的报道。这样的帐户可以(1)告知临床医生何时考虑干预的时机，(2)帮助选择治疗方法，(3)为Lidcombe计划提供补充治疗的资源。因此，本报告记录了在成功治疗结束七年后，对一个孩子和父母关于他们的利德库姆项目治疗经历的单独访谈。本报告和补充材料中附带的视频采访可以成为临床医生在考虑Lidcombe计划治疗时的有用资源。
{"title":"The Lidcombe Program: A client report 7 years post-treatment","authors":"Elaine Yandeau, Brenda Carey, M. Onslow","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923304","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Lidcombe Program (Onslow et al., 2020) is a treatment designed for pre-school children who stutter. To date, there has been no published account from a child of early stuttering experiences with Lidcombe Program treatment. Such an account may (1) inform clinicians when they are considering the timing of intervention, (2) assist with the choice of a treatment, and (3) provide resources to supplement treatment with the Lidcombe Program. Consequently, this report is a record of separate interviews with a child and parent about their Lidcombe Program treatment experience, seven years after the conclusion of successful treatment. It is intended that this report and the accompanying video interview in the supplemental material can be a useful resource for clinicians when considering Lidcombe Program treatment.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80411625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-06DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923302
Carolina Salinas-Marchant, A. Macleod
ABSTRACT This scoping review provides a descriptive synthesis of available evidence on children's audiovisual speech perception. We used eight databases to identify the experimental studies published 2000–2019, and reported the data using the guidelines of PRISMA-ScR designed for scoping reviews. While research conducted prior to 2000 provided a strong foundation in this area, the past two decades have brought technical advances that have allowed for more precise measurement of audiovisual speech perception. Thirty-eight studies were identified: 18 articles that focused on children with typical development, 9 focused on children with autism spectrum disorder, 8 focused on children with speech and language disorders, and 3 focused on children with hearing loss. Most of the studies identified were behavioral studies, while a minority reported on neuroanatomical correlates underlying the audiovisual speech perception. Through this scoping review, key gaps were identified that include few studies in clinical populations, a few studies on languages other than English, and variability in terminology to describe similar or overlapping concepts. Further research is needed to inform the development and mechanisms of audiovisual speech integration in children with different language development paths. In addition, the use of common terminology in future research would improve access to evidence and the communication of this knowledge for researchers and clinicians.
{"title":"Audiovisual speech perception in children: a scoping review","authors":"Carolina Salinas-Marchant, A. Macleod","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923302","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923302","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This scoping review provides a descriptive synthesis of available evidence on children's audiovisual speech perception. We used eight databases to identify the experimental studies published 2000–2019, and reported the data using the guidelines of PRISMA-ScR designed for scoping reviews. While research conducted prior to 2000 provided a strong foundation in this area, the past two decades have brought technical advances that have allowed for more precise measurement of audiovisual speech perception. Thirty-eight studies were identified: 18 articles that focused on children with typical development, 9 focused on children with autism spectrum disorder, 8 focused on children with speech and language disorders, and 3 focused on children with hearing loss. Most of the studies identified were behavioral studies, while a minority reported on neuroanatomical correlates underlying the audiovisual speech perception. Through this scoping review, key gaps were identified that include few studies in clinical populations, a few studies on languages other than English, and variability in terminology to describe similar or overlapping concepts. Further research is needed to inform the development and mechanisms of audiovisual speech integration in children with different language development paths. In addition, the use of common terminology in future research would improve access to evidence and the communication of this knowledge for researchers and clinicians.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83709901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-04DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923303
V. Philip, S. Goswami
ABSTRACT An SLP-preferred symbol set may not always be accepted by the AAC user which makes it essential to investigate how preferences for symbols vary in different population. The primary purpose of the current study was to investigate the preferences between two AAC symbol sets of different cultural origins among neurotypical adults who were natives of Kerala, India. The study also aimed to explore the trend in preferences among adults with aphasia. A total of 240 neurotypical adults and ten adults with aphasia participated in the study. The neurotypical adults encompassed 120 lay-persons from four age groups (i.e., 18–35, 36–50, 51–65, and 66–80), and 120 professionals from three professional categories (i.e., medical and allied health professionals, speech-language pathologists, and special educators). A preference task using IPSC and PCS for the same set of 30 target referents inclusive of nouns, verbs, adjectives, and prepositions was utilized. Both groups of neurotypical adults showed a significant preference for IPSC over PCS for most of the stimuli included in the study. A similar trend was found in adults with aphasia. IPSC was preferred for target referents representing verbs, adjectives, and prepositions, and PCS was preferred for nouns. Analysis of preferences within participant groups revealed that age and profession did not influence symbol preferences in neurotypical adults. The study emphasizes the need to explore preferences among different AAC stakeholders. It also points out that the symbols considered universally iconic may be perceived differently in different cultures and can influence their preferences.
{"title":"Preference between Indian Picture Symbols for Communication (IPSC) and Picture Communication Symbols (PCS) in neurotypical adults and adults with aphasia","authors":"V. Philip, S. Goswami","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1923303","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT An SLP-preferred symbol set may not always be accepted by the AAC user which makes it essential to investigate how preferences for symbols vary in different population. The primary purpose of the current study was to investigate the preferences between two AAC symbol sets of different cultural origins among neurotypical adults who were natives of Kerala, India. The study also aimed to explore the trend in preferences among adults with aphasia. A total of 240 neurotypical adults and ten adults with aphasia participated in the study. The neurotypical adults encompassed 120 lay-persons from four age groups (i.e., 18–35, 36–50, 51–65, and 66–80), and 120 professionals from three professional categories (i.e., medical and allied health professionals, speech-language pathologists, and special educators). A preference task using IPSC and PCS for the same set of 30 target referents inclusive of nouns, verbs, adjectives, and prepositions was utilized. Both groups of neurotypical adults showed a significant preference for IPSC over PCS for most of the stimuli included in the study. A similar trend was found in adults with aphasia. IPSC was preferred for target referents representing verbs, adjectives, and prepositions, and PCS was preferred for nouns. Analysis of preferences within participant groups revealed that age and profession did not influence symbol preferences in neurotypical adults. The study emphasizes the need to explore preferences among different AAC stakeholders. It also points out that the symbols considered universally iconic may be perceived differently in different cultures and can influence their preferences.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87571165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-30DOI: 10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.087
Sujin Choi, E. Jo, J. Sung
Copyright 2021 c Korean Speech-Language & Hearing Association. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 언어 평가가 비대면으로 실시될 수 있는 방법이 고안된다면, 현재와 같이 대면이 어려운 상황에서도 언어재활 서비스를 제 공할 수 있을 것이다. 비대면 언어재활 시스템은 시공간적 제 약으로 인해 언어치료실에 방문하지 못하는 대상자들이나 거동 이 불편한 노년층 및 신경언어장애 환자 군에게 꼭 필요한 시 스템이지만, 국내에서 관련 연구는 매우 제한적이다. 특히 언어 평가는 비대면 시스템으로 구축될 경우, 임상 현장에서 효율적 으로 적용될 수 있어(Dekhtyar et al., 2020), 비대면 언어 평 가를 위한 국내의 연구가 매우 절실한 상황이다. 국외의 경우에는 언어병리학 분야에서 원격 혹은 비대면 기술에 관한 연구가 꾸준히 이루어지고 있고(Cherney & Van Vuuren, 2012; Duffy et al., 1997), 임상에서 시행한 비대면 원격 평가에 대한 연구 결과들이 보고되고 있다. 2016년 American SpeechLanguage Hearing Association (ASHA)의 설문 조사에 따르면, 비대면 원격 시스템을 활용하는 치료사 중, 약 60.7%가 비대면 언 어 평가를 실제 임상에서 시행하고 있다고 밝혀, 국외에서는 국내 보다 이전부터 비대면 시스템을 이용한 언어 평가가 활발하게 진 1
Copyright 2021 c Korean Speech-Language & Hearing Association。this is an open - access article distributed under the terms of the creative creativecommons attribution non - commercial license (http: / /听说过。org / licenses / by - nc / 4.0) which permits unrestrictednon-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited。如果能研究出语言评价在非对称面实施的方法，那么在现在这样很难见面的情况下也能提供语言康复服务。非对称面语言康复系统是因时间和空间药物而不能访问语言治疗室的对象、行动不便的老年层及神经语言障碍患者群所必需的系统，但在国内相关研究非常有限。特别是，如果构建非对称面系统，语言评价可以在临床现场有效应用(Dekhtyar et al.， 2020)，因此，国内迫切需要对非对称面语言评价进行研究。在国外，在语言病理学领域，远程或非对称面技术的研究正在持续进行(Cherney & Van Vuuren, 2012;Duffy et al.， 1997)，临床非对称面远程评估的研究报告。2016年American SpeechLanguage Hearing Association (ASHA)的一项问卷调查显示，使用非对称面远程系统的治疗师中，约有60.7%在实际临床中进行非对称面语言评估，国外比国内更早开始使用非对称面系统进行语言评估
{"title":"Preliminary Study on the Action Naming Test: Online vs. Offline Comparisons by Presentation Type","authors":"Sujin Choi, E. Jo, J. Sung","doi":"10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.087","url":null,"abstract":"Copyright 2021 c Korean Speech-Language & Hearing Association. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 언어 평가가 비대면으로 실시될 수 있는 방법이 고안된다면, 현재와 같이 대면이 어려운 상황에서도 언어재활 서비스를 제 공할 수 있을 것이다. 비대면 언어재활 시스템은 시공간적 제 약으로 인해 언어치료실에 방문하지 못하는 대상자들이나 거동 이 불편한 노년층 및 신경언어장애 환자 군에게 꼭 필요한 시 스템이지만, 국내에서 관련 연구는 매우 제한적이다. 특히 언어 평가는 비대면 시스템으로 구축될 경우, 임상 현장에서 효율적 으로 적용될 수 있어(Dekhtyar et al., 2020), 비대면 언어 평 가를 위한 국내의 연구가 매우 절실한 상황이다. 국외의 경우에는 언어병리학 분야에서 원격 혹은 비대면 기술에 관한 연구가 꾸준히 이루어지고 있고(Cherney & Van Vuuren, 2012; Duffy et al., 1997), 임상에서 시행한 비대면 원격 평가에 대한 연구 결과들이 보고되고 있다. 2016년 American SpeechLanguage Hearing Association (ASHA)의 설문 조사에 따르면, 비대면 원격 시스템을 활용하는 치료사 중, 약 60.7%가 비대면 언 어 평가를 실제 임상에서 시행하고 있다고 밝혀, 국외에서는 국내 보다 이전부터 비대면 시스템을 이용한 언어 평가가 활발하게 진 1","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87224749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-30DOI: 10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.021
H. Kim, M. Shin, Hyun-Jin Chang
{"title":"Development of Web-Based Stepwise Stuttering Treatment (SST) for Children Who Stutter","authors":"H. Kim, M. Shin, Hyun-Jin Chang","doi":"10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75163049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-30DOI: 10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.009
H. Han, E. Park, H. Shin
Copyright 2021 c Korean Speech-Language & Hearing Association. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 해 발생하는 사회적 고립은 우울, 불안 등과 같은 정서적 문제뿐 만 아니라 공격성과 반사회성 등 행동 문제의 원인이 되기도 한다 (Cacioppo et al., 2010, Twenge et al., 2001). 따라서 타인의 감정과 자신의 감정에 대한 이해 및 표현능력은 사회적 관계를 유지하는 데 매우 중요한 요소임을 추정해 볼 수 있다. Choi와 Jung(2012)의 연구에서도 정서인식과 표현능력이 낮을수록 또래 관계가 좋지 않은 것으로 나타나 정서인식과 표현 능력이 또래 관계와 유의한 상관이 있음을 밝히고 있다. 즉, 정서 는 사회적으로 주고받는 것으로 관계의 유대를 위한 매개자이며, 경험의 색채를 통해 일상생활에 의미를 주는 것으로 사회적 관계 를 발달시킨다(Park, 2008) 초등학생의 긍정적 또래 관계 형성은 특히 중요한데, 이 시기에 는 또래 집단이 형성되며 이것이 발달에 매우 중요한 역할을 하게 된다(Seok & Yang, 2018). Qualter 등(2010)은 아동이 또래 집 단에 수용되지 못하는 경우 적응상의 어려움을 겪으며 내재화 혹 은 외현화의 심리적 문제들을 겪게 된다고 하였다. Moffatt 등(1995, as cited in Min, 2016)에 따르면 비장애 1
Copyright 2021 c Korean Speech-Language & Hearing Association。this is an open - access article distributed under the terms of the creative creativecommons attribution non - commercial license (http: / /听说过。org / licenses / by - nc / 4.0) which permits unrestrictednon-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited。年发生的社会孤立不仅是忧郁、不安等情绪问题，还会成为攻击性和反社会性等行动问题的原因(Cacioppo et al.， 2010, Twenge et al.， 2001)。因此可以推测出，对他人的感情和自己的感情的理解及表现能力是维持社会关系的非常重要的要素。Choi和Jung(2012)的研究也显示，情绪认识和表达能力越低，同龄人关系越不好，表明情绪认识和表达能力与同龄人关系有密切的关系。即,情绪是社会交换关系的纽带,为中介,通过经验的色彩,给日常生活的意义是使社会关系发达(park, 2008)小学生的同龄人关系肯定是特别重要的,在这个时期形成的同龄人形成,这对发达很重要作用(seok & yang, 2018)。Qualter等(2010)认为，儿童不能被同龄人接纳时，会有适应上的困难，内在化或外化的心理问题。据Moffatt等(1995年，as cited in Min, 2016年)统计，非残疾1
{"title":"Effect of Group Intervention Using Emoticons on Emotional Empathy and Conversational Function of School-Age Children With Intellectual Disabilities","authors":"H. Han, E. Park, H. Shin","doi":"10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15724/JSLHD.2021.30.2.009","url":null,"abstract":"Copyright 2021 c Korean Speech-Language & Hearing Association. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 해 발생하는 사회적 고립은 우울, 불안 등과 같은 정서적 문제뿐 만 아니라 공격성과 반사회성 등 행동 문제의 원인이 되기도 한다 (Cacioppo et al., 2010, Twenge et al., 2001). 따라서 타인의 감정과 자신의 감정에 대한 이해 및 표현능력은 사회적 관계를 유지하는 데 매우 중요한 요소임을 추정해 볼 수 있다. Choi와 Jung(2012)의 연구에서도 정서인식과 표현능력이 낮을수록 또래 관계가 좋지 않은 것으로 나타나 정서인식과 표현 능력이 또래 관계와 유의한 상관이 있음을 밝히고 있다. 즉, 정서 는 사회적으로 주고받는 것으로 관계의 유대를 위한 매개자이며, 경험의 색채를 통해 일상생활에 의미를 주는 것으로 사회적 관계 를 발달시킨다(Park, 2008) 초등학생의 긍정적 또래 관계 형성은 특히 중요한데, 이 시기에 는 또래 집단이 형성되며 이것이 발달에 매우 중요한 역할을 하게 된다(Seok & Yang, 2018). Qualter 등(2010)은 아동이 또래 집 단에 수용되지 못하는 경우 적응상의 어려움을 겪으며 내재화 혹 은 외현화의 심리적 문제들을 겪게 된다고 하였다. Moffatt 등(1995, as cited in Min, 2016)에 따르면 비장애 1","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89767945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：