Pub Date : 2021-09-16DOI: 10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0034
Dan Chyutin
{"title":"Transcendental Style Reconsidered: Absence, Presence, and a \"Place Which Is Not-a-Place\"","authors":"Dan Chyutin","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"34 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45587306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-16DOI: 10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0023
A. Adams
{"title":"Camp X-Ray and the Task of Critique: Torturability and the Politics of Ethical Recognition in Guantanamo","authors":"A. Adams","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"23 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46567341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-16DOI: 10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0047
Chris Dent
about the dead and the undead. The practices around describing narrative life will be analyzed in terms of “discursive practices”—taken from the realm of poststructuralist theory—in order to consider the specifics of the discussed films, in terms of the body of knowledge with which the writers work. This analysis, therefore, provides a theoretically based understanding of the limits of expression and, as a result, the content of what appears onscreen. The goal, however, is to expand the discussion of the extent to which audiences take lessons from movies—the extent to which films, as technologies of “biopower,” guide us in the living of our lives.
{"title":"\"Narrative Life\" in Film and the Role of Screenwriting Practices","authors":"Chris Dent","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0047","url":null,"abstract":"about the dead and the undead. The practices around describing narrative life will be analyzed in terms of “discursive practices”—taken from the realm of poststructuralist theory—in order to consider the specifics of the discussed films, in terms of the body of knowledge with which the writers work. This analysis, therefore, provides a theoretically based understanding of the limits of expression and, as a result, the content of what appears onscreen. The goal, however, is to expand the discussion of the extent to which audiences take lessons from movies—the extent to which films, as technologies of “biopower,” guide us in the living of our lives.","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"47 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44737430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-16DOI: 10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0003
Shawna Kidman, A. Adams, Dan Chyutin, Chris Dent
dominance, the company reshaped the theatrical market, forcing changes onto exhibitors and competing studios (Schwartzel, “Disney Lays Down the Law”; Galloway; D’Alessandro). It also intensified the “streaming wars” by introducing Disney+, the first significant play in streaming video on demand by a major studio and a move that signaled Hollywood’s willingness to pivot to nontheatrical delivery platforms. The other major studios spent the decade trying to catch up by cutting their number of releases and chasing potential franchises at the expense of lowand mid-budget original films (Ball). In short, Disney led Hollywood out of the blockbuster era of the 1990s and early 2000s and came to define how business was done in the franchise era and what the culture that arose out of it looked like. One key facet of this Disney-led transition was a shift in Hollywood’s balance of power away from people and toward brands; in the franchise era, value came from studio-owned intellectual property, not from the contributions of individual artists or workers (Fritz, Big Picture 84–86; Fleury et al. 10–12; Thompson 3). To support this value shift, Disney advanced a discourse around authorship that I refer to here as “corporate auteurism.” This updated and corporatized version of classic auteur theory prioritized managerial expertise over creative vision. Promoted through a vast PR machine, it credited studio executives (specifically, Kevin Feige, John Lasseter, and Kathleen Kennedy) with masterminding the studio’s biggest brands (Marvel, Pixar, and Star Wars, respectively) and Introduction
{"title":"The Disneyfication of Authorship: Above-the-Line Creative Labor in the Franchise Era","authors":"Shawna Kidman, A. Adams, Dan Chyutin, Chris Dent","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0003","url":null,"abstract":"dominance, the company reshaped the theatrical market, forcing changes onto exhibitors and competing studios (Schwartzel, “Disney Lays Down the Law”; Galloway; D’Alessandro). It also intensified the “streaming wars” by introducing Disney+, the first significant play in streaming video on demand by a major studio and a move that signaled Hollywood’s willingness to pivot to nontheatrical delivery platforms. The other major studios spent the decade trying to catch up by cutting their number of releases and chasing potential franchises at the expense of lowand mid-budget original films (Ball). In short, Disney led Hollywood out of the blockbuster era of the 1990s and early 2000s and came to define how business was done in the franchise era and what the culture that arose out of it looked like. One key facet of this Disney-led transition was a shift in Hollywood’s balance of power away from people and toward brands; in the franchise era, value came from studio-owned intellectual property, not from the contributions of individual artists or workers (Fritz, Big Picture 84–86; Fleury et al. 10–12; Thompson 3). To support this value shift, Disney advanced a discourse around authorship that I refer to here as “corporate auteurism.” This updated and corporatized version of classic auteur theory prioritized managerial expertise over creative vision. Promoted through a vast PR machine, it credited studio executives (specifically, Kevin Feige, John Lasseter, and Kathleen Kennedy) with masterminding the studio’s biggest brands (Marvel, Pixar, and Star Wars, respectively) and Introduction","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"22 - 23 - 3 - 33 - 34 - 46 - 47 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47899988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-11DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0026
Alison L. Mckee
in 2011 melanie notkin, a contributor to the online site HuffPost, wrote an opinion piece titled “Is ‘Career Woman’ the New ‘Spinster’?” In it she recounts a conversation with a man who explained her singleness (more to himself than to her) as a function of her being a career woman. “Why are we ‘career women’ but you’re just a guy who hasn’t been lucky in love?” she asks him. “I’m not a ‘career woman,’” she declares. “I’m looking for love.” Surprising (and somewhat depressing) for its implicit recapitulation of the stereotype of the lonely career woman whose occupation is a poor substitute for a man, the title of Notkin’s brief op-ed nevertheless anticipates the recent trend to rehabilitate the term “spinster” and repurpose it for feminist studies and post-feminism. Kate Bolick’s Spinster: Making a Life of One’s Own (2015), an examination of her own and other women’s single lives, made The New York Times best-seller list, and Briallen Hopper’s Hard to Love: Essays and Confessions (2019) explores and reclaims the spinster in ways that demolish heterosexual romance and marriage as the standard by which women lead and assess their lives. That the term’s negative connotations of dowdiness, lack of sexual appeal, and illegitimacy as a woman persist into the twenty-first century is due in no small measure to the role that classical Hollywood film in particular played in perpetuating these stereotypes in the popular imagination. Yet as this examination of David Lean’s 1955 film Summertime suggests, as a kind of test case, some mid-century spinster narratives contain within them the seeds of their own reclamation, particularly when watched anew from the vantage point of the twenty-first century. Informed by a history of the film’s production and reception, yet also enabled by current-day digital viewing practices, this case study asserts that multiple gazes in and at Summertime dovetail with Katharine Hepburn star discourses to produce a possessive feminist spectator more than sixty-five years after the film’s original release. A present-day viewing of the under-studied Summertime with new media technologies leads to modes of meaning production in the course of the film’s consumption in ways that have not been previously explored in earlier spinster narratives or in classical Hollywood cinema generally, and it is these dynamics that this case study ultimately explores. Film theorist Laura Mulvey has dubbed cinema “death 24x a times a second,” a reference to the standard projection speed of twenty-four To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean’s Summertime (1955)
2011年,在线网站《赫芬顿邮报》的撰稿人melanie notkin写了一篇题为《“职业女性”是新的“旋转者”吗。她问他:“为什么我们是‘职业女性’,而你只是一个在爱情中运气不佳的人?”。“我不是一个‘职业女性’,”她宣称。“我在寻找爱。”令人惊讶(也有点沮丧)的是,诺特金的简短专栏文章的标题含蓄地重述了孤独职业女性的刻板印象,她的职业很难替代男性。然而,它预见到了最近的趋势,即恢复“老处女”一词,并将其重新用于女权主义研究和后女权主义。凯特·博利克(Kate Bolick)的《Spinster:Making a Life of One’s Own》(2015)对她自己和其他女性的单身生活进行了审视,并登上了《纽约时报》畅销书排行榜,布里艾伦·霍珀(Briallen Hopper)的《难以爱:随笔与自白》(2019)以打破异性恋浪漫和婚姻作为女性领导和评估生活标准的方式,探索并重新审视了这位年轻人。这个词对邋遢、缺乏性吸引力和女性非法性的负面含义一直持续到21世纪,这在很大程度上要归功于经典好莱坞电影在大众想象中延续这些刻板印象方面所扮演的角色。然而,正如对大卫·利恩1955年电影《夏日时光》的研究所表明的那样,作为一种测试案例,一些世纪中期的老处女叙事中包含了他们自己开垦的种子,尤其是当从21世纪的有利位置重新观看时。这项案例研究了解了这部电影的制作和接受历史,但也得益于当今的数字观看实践,它断言,在电影最初上映六十五年多后,在夏季和夏季的多次凝视与凯瑟琳·赫本的明星话语相吻合,产生了一种占有欲强的女权主义观众。如今,用新媒体技术观看研究不足的《夏日》,会在电影消费过程中产生意义生产模式,这种模式在早期的老处女叙事或传统好莱坞电影中都没有被探索过,而本案例研究最终探索的正是这些动态。电影理论家劳拉·马尔维(Laura Mulvey)将电影称为“每秒24倍的死亡”,指的是大卫·莱恩(David Lean)的《夏日》(Summertime)(1955年)中24小时的标准放映速度:《占有的旁观者》(the Possession Spectator)、《旋转叙事》(Spinster Narrative)和凯瑟琳·赫本(Katharine Hepburn)
{"title":"To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean's Summertime (1955)","authors":"Alison L. Mckee","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0026","url":null,"abstract":"in 2011 melanie notkin, a contributor to the online site HuffPost, wrote an opinion piece titled “Is ‘Career Woman’ the New ‘Spinster’?” In it she recounts a conversation with a man who explained her singleness (more to himself than to her) as a function of her being a career woman. “Why are we ‘career women’ but you’re just a guy who hasn’t been lucky in love?” she asks him. “I’m not a ‘career woman,’” she declares. “I’m looking for love.” Surprising (and somewhat depressing) for its implicit recapitulation of the stereotype of the lonely career woman whose occupation is a poor substitute for a man, the title of Notkin’s brief op-ed nevertheless anticipates the recent trend to rehabilitate the term “spinster” and repurpose it for feminist studies and post-feminism. Kate Bolick’s Spinster: Making a Life of One’s Own (2015), an examination of her own and other women’s single lives, made The New York Times best-seller list, and Briallen Hopper’s Hard to Love: Essays and Confessions (2019) explores and reclaims the spinster in ways that demolish heterosexual romance and marriage as the standard by which women lead and assess their lives. That the term’s negative connotations of dowdiness, lack of sexual appeal, and illegitimacy as a woman persist into the twenty-first century is due in no small measure to the role that classical Hollywood film in particular played in perpetuating these stereotypes in the popular imagination. Yet as this examination of David Lean’s 1955 film Summertime suggests, as a kind of test case, some mid-century spinster narratives contain within them the seeds of their own reclamation, particularly when watched anew from the vantage point of the twenty-first century. Informed by a history of the film’s production and reception, yet also enabled by current-day digital viewing practices, this case study asserts that multiple gazes in and at Summertime dovetail with Katharine Hepburn star discourses to produce a possessive feminist spectator more than sixty-five years after the film’s original release. A present-day viewing of the under-studied Summertime with new media technologies leads to modes of meaning production in the course of the film’s consumption in ways that have not been previously explored in earlier spinster narratives or in classical Hollywood cinema generally, and it is these dynamics that this case study ultimately explores. Film theorist Laura Mulvey has dubbed cinema “death 24x a times a second,” a reference to the standard projection speed of twenty-four To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean’s Summertime (1955)","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"26 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44116417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-13DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0033
Dario Lanza Vidal
{"title":"From the Opening Sequence of Citizen Kane to the Final Shot of The Birds: A Filmic Microanalysis of Three Painted Scenes","authors":"Dario Lanza Vidal","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"33 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48699346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-13DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0003
Beatriz Oria, L. Soberon, Dario Lanza Vidal, D. Dubois
{"title":"\"I'm Taken … by Myself\": Romantic Crisis in the Self-Centered Indie Rom-Com","authors":"Beatriz Oria, L. Soberon, Dario Lanza Vidal, D. Dubois","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"17 - 18 - 3 - 32 - 33 - 47 - 48 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48292771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}