首页 > 最新文献

JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO最新文献

英文 中文
Transcendental Style Reconsidered: Absence, Presence, and a "Place Which Is Not-a-Place" 超越风格的反思:缺席、在场与“非地方”
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI: 10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0034
Dan Chyutin
{"title":"Transcendental Style Reconsidered: Absence, Presence, and a \"Place Which Is Not-a-Place\"","authors":"Dan Chyutin","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"34 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45587306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Camp X-Ray and the Task of Critique: Torturability and the Politics of Ethical Recognition in Guantanamo X光营与批判的任务:关塔那摩的扭曲性与伦理承认政治
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI: 10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0023
A. Adams
{"title":"Camp X-Ray and the Task of Critique: Torturability and the Politics of Ethical Recognition in Guantanamo","authors":"A. Adams","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"23 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46567341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
"Narrative Life" in Film and the Role of Screenwriting Practices 电影中的“叙事生活”与编剧实践的作用
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI: 10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0047
Chris Dent
about the dead and the undead. The practices around describing narrative life will be analyzed in terms of “discursive practices”—taken from the realm of poststructuralist theory—in order to consider the specifics of the discussed films, in terms of the body of knowledge with which the writers work. This analysis, therefore, provides a theoretically based understanding of the limits of expression and, as a result, the content of what appears onscreen. The goal, however, is to expand the discussion of the extent to which audiences take lessons from movies—the extent to which films, as technologies of “biopower,” guide us in the living of our lives.
关于死人和不死族。围绕描述叙事生活的实践将从“话语实践”的角度进行分析——从后结构主义理论的领域出发——以便考虑所讨论的电影的具体特点,以及作者所使用的知识体系。因此,这种分析提供了对表达限制的理论基础理解,从而提供了屏幕上出现的内容。然而,我们的目标是扩大关于观众从电影中吸取教训的程度的讨论——电影作为“生物力量”的技术,在多大程度上指导我们的生活。
{"title":"\"Narrative Life\" in Film and the Role of Screenwriting Practices","authors":"Chris Dent","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0047","url":null,"abstract":"about the dead and the undead. The practices around describing narrative life will be analyzed in terms of “discursive practices”—taken from the realm of poststructuralist theory—in order to consider the specifics of the discussed films, in terms of the body of knowledge with which the writers work. This analysis, therefore, provides a theoretically based understanding of the limits of expression and, as a result, the content of what appears onscreen. The goal, however, is to expand the discussion of the extent to which audiences take lessons from movies—the extent to which films, as technologies of “biopower,” guide us in the living of our lives.","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"47 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44737430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The Disneyfication of Authorship: Above-the-Line Creative Labor in the Franchise Era 作者的迪斯尼化:特许经营时代的线上创作劳动
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-09-16 DOI: 10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0003
Shawna Kidman, A. Adams, Dan Chyutin, Chris Dent
dominance, the company reshaped the theatrical market, forcing changes onto exhibitors and competing studios (Schwartzel, “Disney Lays Down the Law”; Galloway; D’Alessandro). It also intensified the “streaming wars” by introducing Disney+, the first significant play in streaming video on demand by a major studio and a move that signaled Hollywood’s willingness to pivot to nontheatrical delivery platforms. The other major studios spent the decade trying to catch up by cutting their number of releases and chasing potential franchises at the expense of lowand mid-budget original films (Ball). In short, Disney led Hollywood out of the blockbuster era of the 1990s and early 2000s and came to define how business was done in the franchise era and what the culture that arose out of it looked like. One key facet of this Disney-led transition was a shift in Hollywood’s balance of power away from people and toward brands; in the franchise era, value came from studio-owned intellectual property, not from the contributions of individual artists or workers (Fritz, Big Picture 84–86; Fleury et al. 10–12; Thompson 3). To support this value shift, Disney advanced a discourse around authorship that I refer to here as “corporate auteurism.” This updated and corporatized version of classic auteur theory prioritized managerial expertise over creative vision. Promoted through a vast PR machine, it credited studio executives (specifically, Kevin Feige, John Lasseter, and Kathleen Kennedy) with masterminding the studio’s biggest brands (Marvel, Pixar, and Star Wars, respectively) and Introduction
在主导地位下,该公司重塑了戏剧市场,迫使参展商和竞争工作室发生变化(Schwartzel,《迪士尼放下法律》;Galloway;D’Alessandro)。它还通过引入Disney+加剧了“流媒体战争”,这是大型工作室在流媒体视频点播方面的第一部重要剧目,此举标志着好莱坞愿意转向非数字交付平台。其他主要的电影公司花了十年的时间试图通过减少发行数量和追逐潜在的特许经营权来迎头赶上,而牺牲了中低成本的原创电影(Ball)。简言之,迪士尼带领好莱坞走出了20世纪90年代和21世纪初的大片时代,并开始定义特许经营时代的商业运作方式以及由此产生的文化。迪士尼主导的转型的一个关键方面是好莱坞的力量平衡从人转向品牌;在特许经营时代,价值来自工作室拥有的知识产权,而不是艺术家或工人个人的贡献(Fritz,Big Picture 84-86;Fleury等人10-12;Thompson 3)。为了支持这种价值观的转变,迪士尼提出了一种关于作者身份的论述,我在这里称之为“企业导演主义”。这种经典导演理论的更新和公司化版本将管理专业知识置于创造性视野之上。它通过一个庞大的公关机器进行宣传,称赞工作室高管(特别是凯文·费格、约翰·拉塞特和凯瑟琳·肯尼迪)策划了工作室最大的品牌(分别是漫威、皮克斯和星球大战)和简介
{"title":"The Disneyfication of Authorship: Above-the-Line Creative Labor in the Franchise Era","authors":"Shawna Kidman, A. Adams, Dan Chyutin, Chris Dent","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.73.3.0003","url":null,"abstract":"dominance, the company reshaped the theatrical market, forcing changes onto exhibitors and competing studios (Schwartzel, “Disney Lays Down the Law”; Galloway; D’Alessandro). It also intensified the “streaming wars” by introducing Disney+, the first significant play in streaming video on demand by a major studio and a move that signaled Hollywood’s willingness to pivot to nontheatrical delivery platforms. The other major studios spent the decade trying to catch up by cutting their number of releases and chasing potential franchises at the expense of lowand mid-budget original films (Ball). In short, Disney led Hollywood out of the blockbuster era of the 1990s and early 2000s and came to define how business was done in the franchise era and what the culture that arose out of it looked like. One key facet of this Disney-led transition was a shift in Hollywood’s balance of power away from people and toward brands; in the franchise era, value came from studio-owned intellectual property, not from the contributions of individual artists or workers (Fritz, Big Picture 84–86; Fleury et al. 10–12; Thompson 3). To support this value shift, Disney advanced a discourse around authorship that I refer to here as “corporate auteurism.” This updated and corporatized version of classic auteur theory prioritized managerial expertise over creative vision. Promoted through a vast PR machine, it credited studio executives (specifically, Kevin Feige, John Lasseter, and Kathleen Kennedy) with masterminding the studio’s biggest brands (Marvel, Pixar, and Star Wars, respectively) and Introduction","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"22 - 23 - 3 - 33 - 34 - 46 - 47 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47899988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Imaginary in the Biopic: Deconstructing Convention in Ron Howard's A Beautiful Mind (2001) 生物电影中的想象:罗恩·霍华德的《美丽心灵》(2001)中的解构传统
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-06-11 DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0046
I. Radzinski
©2021 by the board of trustees of the university of illinois author sylvia nasar opens the biography A Beautiful Mind: The Life of Mathematical Genius and Nobel Laureate John Nash with a quote from William Wordsworth that envisions a mind forever “[v]oyaging through strange seas of Thought, alone,” which portends a narrative describing the often dynamic but reclusive mind of John Nash, a socially awkward and eccentric mathematical prodigy whose aptly titled Nash Equilibrium was a leading concept utilized in the field of governing dynamics (Nasar 11). Like the figure described by Wordsworth, the Nash portrayed in Ron Howard’s biopic A Beautiful Mind (2001), here played by Academy Award winner Russell Crowe, is beset by strange thoughts—paranoid schizophrenia, specifically, which manifests in the form of three initially corporeal individuals later revealed to be delusions within the film’s narrative: Charles Herman (Paul Bettany), Nash’s witty and cavalier college roommate at Princeton and emotional confidant; Marcee Herman (Vivien Cardone), Charles Herman’s young niece, who facilitates a much-needed humanity in the antisocial Nash; and perhaps most important of all, William Parcher (Ed Harris), who enlists Nash’s help at the Department of Defense to combat the risk of a communist invasion and, later, the impending threat of a bomb being detonated on United States soil. Most notable, though, are Nash’s reliance on Charles for both emotional support and advice through many difficult times in his life (struggling to succeed in college, deciding whether to marry Alicia Larde [Jennifer Connelly], etc.) and his relationship with his covert and dictatorial supervisor, William Parcher, whose mission orders become increasingly clandestine and engender Nash with a paranoia that begins to affect his relationship with his new wife and child. One of the major conventions of the biopic that George Custen describes in his seminal work on the subject, Bio/Pics: How Hollywood Constructed Public History, is the place the secondary characters hold in the travails of the biographical film’s protagonist. Custen argues that secondary characters in biopics essentially act as a support system for the heterosexual male lead character and aid in his ability to succeed. While secondary characters are a mainstay in most Hollywood fare, their role in biopics is especially integral since they serve as one of several levels of encouragement (the wife character being another) needed for the lead male character to surmount the generic challenges imposed by his genius. In Howard’s A Beautiful Mind, the secondary characters initially exist as support systems necessary for Nash’s success. However, unlike the secondary characters described by Custen, the figures that the audience firmly believes to be supporting Nash’s humanity and patriotism, respectively, are in fact the very sources of Nash’s mental breakdown and eventual hospitalization. Hence, Howard’s The Imaginary in the Biopi
©2021由伊利诺伊大学董事会撰写的作家西尔维娅·纳萨尔在传记《美丽的心灵:数学天才和诺贝尔奖获得者约翰·纳什的一生》的开篇引用了威廉·华兹华斯的一句话,他设想一个心灵永远“独自在奇异的思想海洋中漂浮”,这预示着一种描述约翰·纳什经常充满活力但与世隔绝的心灵的叙事,一位社交尴尬且古怪的数学神童,其恰当的标题“纳什均衡”是治理动力学领域的领先概念(美国宇航局11号)。就像华兹华斯笔下的人物一样,罗恩·霍华德的传记电影《美丽心灵》(2001)中塑造的纳什(由奥斯卡奖得主罗素·克劳饰演)也被奇怪的想法所困扰——特别是偏执性精神分裂症,表现为三个最初有肉体的人,后来在电影叙事中被揭露为妄想症:查尔斯·赫尔曼(保罗·贝塔尼饰),纳什在普林斯顿大学的大学室友,机智而傲慢,是情感上的知己;Marcee Herman(Vivien Cardone饰),Charles Herman的年轻侄女,在反社会的Nash中促进了急需的人性;也许最重要的是威廉·帕彻(埃德·哈里斯饰),他在国防部寻求纳什的帮助,以应对共产主义入侵的风险,以及后来即将在美国本土引爆炸弹的威胁。然而,最值得注意的是,纳什在生活中的许多困难时期(努力在大学取得成功,决定是否嫁给艾丽西亚·拉德(詹妮弗·康纳利)等)都依赖查尔斯提供情感支持和建议,以及他与他隐秘而独裁的上司威廉·帕彻的关系,他的任务命令变得越来越秘密,并使纳什产生了偏执狂,这开始影响他与新婚妻子和孩子的关系。乔治·库斯顿在其关于这一主题的开创性著作《生物/图片:好莱坞如何构建公共历史》中描述了传记电影的一个主要惯例,即次要角色在传记电影主人公的痛苦中所处的位置。Custen认为,传记片中的次要角色本质上是异性恋男主角的支持系统,有助于他取得成功。虽然次要角色是大多数好莱坞电影的支柱,但他们在传记电影中的角色尤其不可或缺,因为他们是男主角克服天才带来的一般挑战所需的几个层面的鼓励之一(妻子角色是另一个)。在霍华德的《美丽心灵》中,次要角色最初是作为纳什成功所必需的支撑系统而存在的。然而,与卡斯特笔下的次要人物不同,观众坚信分别支持纳什人性和爱国主义的人物,实际上正是纳什精神崩溃和最终住院的根源。因此,霍华德的《生物电影中的想象:在罗恩·霍华德的《美丽心灵》中解构传统》(2001)
{"title":"The Imaginary in the Biopic: Deconstructing Convention in Ron Howard's A Beautiful Mind (2001)","authors":"I. Radzinski","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0046","url":null,"abstract":"©2021 by the board of trustees of the university of illinois author sylvia nasar opens the biography A Beautiful Mind: The Life of Mathematical Genius and Nobel Laureate John Nash with a quote from William Wordsworth that envisions a mind forever “[v]oyaging through strange seas of Thought, alone,” which portends a narrative describing the often dynamic but reclusive mind of John Nash, a socially awkward and eccentric mathematical prodigy whose aptly titled Nash Equilibrium was a leading concept utilized in the field of governing dynamics (Nasar 11). Like the figure described by Wordsworth, the Nash portrayed in Ron Howard’s biopic A Beautiful Mind (2001), here played by Academy Award winner Russell Crowe, is beset by strange thoughts—paranoid schizophrenia, specifically, which manifests in the form of three initially corporeal individuals later revealed to be delusions within the film’s narrative: Charles Herman (Paul Bettany), Nash’s witty and cavalier college roommate at Princeton and emotional confidant; Marcee Herman (Vivien Cardone), Charles Herman’s young niece, who facilitates a much-needed humanity in the antisocial Nash; and perhaps most important of all, William Parcher (Ed Harris), who enlists Nash’s help at the Department of Defense to combat the risk of a communist invasion and, later, the impending threat of a bomb being detonated on United States soil. Most notable, though, are Nash’s reliance on Charles for both emotional support and advice through many difficult times in his life (struggling to succeed in college, deciding whether to marry Alicia Larde [Jennifer Connelly], etc.) and his relationship with his covert and dictatorial supervisor, William Parcher, whose mission orders become increasingly clandestine and engender Nash with a paranoia that begins to affect his relationship with his new wife and child. One of the major conventions of the biopic that George Custen describes in his seminal work on the subject, Bio/Pics: How Hollywood Constructed Public History, is the place the secondary characters hold in the travails of the biographical film’s protagonist. Custen argues that secondary characters in biopics essentially act as a support system for the heterosexual male lead character and aid in his ability to succeed. While secondary characters are a mainstay in most Hollywood fare, their role in biopics is especially integral since they serve as one of several levels of encouragement (the wife character being another) needed for the lead male character to surmount the generic challenges imposed by his genius. In Howard’s A Beautiful Mind, the secondary characters initially exist as support systems necessary for Nash’s success. However, unlike the secondary characters described by Custen, the figures that the audience firmly believes to be supporting Nash’s humanity and patriotism, respectively, are in fact the very sources of Nash’s mental breakdown and eventual hospitalization. Hence, Howard’s The Imaginary in the Biopi","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"46 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42538995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Atomic Tests: Experimental Filmmaking in the Nuclear Era 原子试验:核时代的实验电影制作
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-06-11 DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0011
Hannah Goodwin
©2021 by the board of trustees of the university of illinois on july 16, 1945, a group of scientists led by J. Robert Oppenheimer gathered in the aptly named Jornada del Muerto desert in New Mexico to test the experiment they had been working on for the past five years: the world’s first atomic bomb. Armed with simulations and speculations but never having seen the results of their work, the scientists took measures to document this test detonation in every way they could. It was filmed by multiple cameras serving different scientific purposes and by three newsreel cameras whose footage was intended for mass consumption. The footage from these cameras has become iconic. Each camera was nearly six miles from the site of detonation and used varying lenses and frame rates to capture the tests. One such test, filmed at a frame rate of 119 frames per second, presents an image of thick, billowing clouds illuminated dramatically from behind. Slow-motion cinematography reveals the morphology of the forms, whose profoundly elemental quality evokes the wonders of creation. The scientists, when witnessing the initial test bomb firsthand, described a visual force that utterly overwhelmed their senses: they were “completely blinded by the flash”—as if “the whole world was gone up in flames”—and then came an “unearthly hovering cloud” (Bob Serber, James Conant, and Oppenheimer, qtd. in Bird and Sherwin 307–08). A verse from the Hindu text the Bhagavad-Gita came to Oppenheimer’s mind: “If the radiance of a thousand suns / were burst into the sky, / that would be like / the splendor of the Mighty One. / Now I am become Death, the shatterer of worlds” (qtd. in Jungk 210). The atomic bomb had seemingly harnessed the divine power of the cosmos, creative but also spectacularly destructive, and the vision inspired in Oppenheimer a sense of his own godliness. He immediately knew that “the world would never be the same” (Bird and Sherwin 309). Remarkably, as scientists began to discuss whether or not to implement the “gadget” they had created, they focused most intensely on the visual impact of the atomic bomb. Oppenheimer wrote that “the visual effect of an atomic bombing would be tremendous” (qtd. in Bird and Sherwin 296), and the other scientists speculated that such an image would serve to incarnate an absolute power in the face of which any enemy could only surrender (Bird and Sherwin 296–99). There was some discussion of simply filming an atomic test as propaganda to provoke surrender of the Axis: the visual impact alone, some postulated, would be enough to end the war. Although politicians soon resolved to use the bomb itself instead of its visual record, this discussion leaves lingering questions about how film could be used to document and convey the cosmic scale and power of the bomb. The enormity of the bomb’s visual impact also prompted new thinking about space and time at the level of cosmology. As Secretary of War Henry Stimson declared, the bomb had brou
©2021年由伊利诺伊大学董事会于1945年7月16日,由J.Robert Oppenheimer领导的一群科学家聚集在新墨西哥州名为Jornada del Muerto的沙漠中,测试他们在过去五年中一直在进行的实验:世界上第一颗原子弹。有了模拟和推测,但从未看到他们的工作结果,科学家们采取了各种措施,尽一切可能记录这次测试爆炸。它由多台用于不同科学目的的摄像机和三台用于大众消费的新闻短片摄像机拍摄。这些摄像机的镜头已经成为标志性的。每台摄像机距离爆炸现场近6英里,使用不同的镜头和帧速率来捕捉测试。一个这样的测试以每秒119帧的帧速率拍摄,呈现了一幅从背后戏剧性地照亮的厚而翻腾的云层的图像。慢镜头摄影揭示了形式的形态,其深刻的元素品质唤起了创作的奇迹。科学家们在亲眼目睹最初的测试炸弹时,描述了一种完全淹没他们感官的视觉力量:他们“被闪电完全弄瞎了眼睛”——就好像“整个世界都被火焰吞噬了”——然后出现了一团“神秘的盘旋云”(Bob Serber、James Conant和Oppenheimer,qtd.在Bird and Sherwin 307-08中)。奥本海默脑海中浮现出印度教文本《薄伽梵歌》中的一句话:“如果一千个太阳的光辉/绽放在天空中,/那就像/强者的光辉。/现在我变成了死亡,世界的破碎者”(第210页)。原子弹似乎利用了宇宙的神圣力量,具有创造性,但也具有惊人的破坏性,奥本海默的愿景激发了他自己的虔诚感。他立刻知道“世界将永远不会一样”(Bird和Sherwin 309)。值得注意的是,当科学家们开始讨论是否要实现他们创造的“小工具”时,他们最关注的是原子弹的视觉影响。奥本海默写道,“原子弹轰炸的视觉效果将是巨大的”(见Bird和Sherwin 296),其他科学家推测,这样的图像将体现一种绝对的力量,面对这种力量,任何敌人都只能投降(Bird和Shelwin 296-99)。有人讨论过简单地拍摄一次原子试验作为宣传,以促使轴心国投降:一些人认为,光是视觉冲击就足以结束战争。尽管政客们很快决定使用炸弹本身,而不是它的视觉记录,但这场讨论留下了挥之不去的问题,即如何使用电影来记录和传达炸弹的宇宙规模和威力。炸弹视觉冲击的巨大性也促使人们在宇宙学的层面上对空间和时间进行新的思考。正如战争部长亨利·史汀生所宣称的那样,这枚炸弹带来了“人类与宇宙关系的革命性变化”(qtd.在《鸟与原子试验:核时代的实验电影制作》中)
{"title":"Atomic Tests: Experimental Filmmaking in the Nuclear Era","authors":"Hannah Goodwin","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0011","url":null,"abstract":"©2021 by the board of trustees of the university of illinois on july 16, 1945, a group of scientists led by J. Robert Oppenheimer gathered in the aptly named Jornada del Muerto desert in New Mexico to test the experiment they had been working on for the past five years: the world’s first atomic bomb. Armed with simulations and speculations but never having seen the results of their work, the scientists took measures to document this test detonation in every way they could. It was filmed by multiple cameras serving different scientific purposes and by three newsreel cameras whose footage was intended for mass consumption. The footage from these cameras has become iconic. Each camera was nearly six miles from the site of detonation and used varying lenses and frame rates to capture the tests. One such test, filmed at a frame rate of 119 frames per second, presents an image of thick, billowing clouds illuminated dramatically from behind. Slow-motion cinematography reveals the morphology of the forms, whose profoundly elemental quality evokes the wonders of creation. The scientists, when witnessing the initial test bomb firsthand, described a visual force that utterly overwhelmed their senses: they were “completely blinded by the flash”—as if “the whole world was gone up in flames”—and then came an “unearthly hovering cloud” (Bob Serber, James Conant, and Oppenheimer, qtd. in Bird and Sherwin 307–08). A verse from the Hindu text the Bhagavad-Gita came to Oppenheimer’s mind: “If the radiance of a thousand suns / were burst into the sky, / that would be like / the splendor of the Mighty One. / Now I am become Death, the shatterer of worlds” (qtd. in Jungk 210). The atomic bomb had seemingly harnessed the divine power of the cosmos, creative but also spectacularly destructive, and the vision inspired in Oppenheimer a sense of his own godliness. He immediately knew that “the world would never be the same” (Bird and Sherwin 309). Remarkably, as scientists began to discuss whether or not to implement the “gadget” they had created, they focused most intensely on the visual impact of the atomic bomb. Oppenheimer wrote that “the visual effect of an atomic bombing would be tremendous” (qtd. in Bird and Sherwin 296), and the other scientists speculated that such an image would serve to incarnate an absolute power in the face of which any enemy could only surrender (Bird and Sherwin 296–99). There was some discussion of simply filming an atomic test as propaganda to provoke surrender of the Axis: the visual impact alone, some postulated, would be enough to end the war. Although politicians soon resolved to use the bomb itself instead of its visual record, this discussion leaves lingering questions about how film could be used to document and convey the cosmic scale and power of the bomb. The enormity of the bomb’s visual impact also prompted new thinking about space and time at the level of cosmology. As Secretary of War Henry Stimson declared, the bomb had brou","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"11 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48989024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean's Summertime (1955) 拥有和持有:《占有的旁观者》、《旋转叙事》和《大卫·莱恩的夏天》中的凯瑟琳·赫本(1955)
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-06-11 DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0026
Alison L. Mckee
in 2011 melanie notkin, a contributor to the online site HuffPost, wrote an opinion piece titled “Is ‘Career Woman’ the New ‘Spinster’?” In it she recounts a conversation with a man who explained her singleness (more to himself than to her) as a function of her being a career woman. “Why are we ‘career women’ but you’re just a guy who hasn’t been lucky in love?” she asks him. “I’m not a ‘career woman,’” she declares. “I’m looking for love.” Surprising (and somewhat depressing) for its implicit recapitulation of the stereotype of the lonely career woman whose occupation is a poor substitute for a man, the title of Notkin’s brief op-ed nevertheless anticipates the recent trend to rehabilitate the term “spinster” and repurpose it for feminist studies and post-feminism. Kate Bolick’s Spinster: Making a Life of One’s Own (2015), an examination of her own and other women’s single lives, made The New York Times best-seller list, and Briallen Hopper’s Hard to Love: Essays and Confessions (2019) explores and reclaims the spinster in ways that demolish heterosexual romance and marriage as the standard by which women lead and assess their lives. That the term’s negative connotations of dowdiness, lack of sexual appeal, and illegitimacy as a woman persist into the twenty-first century is due in no small measure to the role that classical Hollywood film in particular played in perpetuating these stereotypes in the popular imagination. Yet as this examination of David Lean’s 1955 film Summertime suggests, as a kind of test case, some mid-century spinster narratives contain within them the seeds of their own reclamation, particularly when watched anew from the vantage point of the twenty-first century. Informed by a history of the film’s production and reception, yet also enabled by current-day digital viewing practices, this case study asserts that multiple gazes in and at Summertime dovetail with Katharine Hepburn star discourses to produce a possessive feminist spectator more than sixty-five years after the film’s original release. A present-day viewing of the under-studied Summertime with new media technologies leads to modes of meaning production in the course of the film’s consumption in ways that have not been previously explored in earlier spinster narratives or in classical Hollywood cinema generally, and it is these dynamics that this case study ultimately explores. Film theorist Laura Mulvey has dubbed cinema “death 24x a times a second,” a reference to the standard projection speed of twenty-four To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean’s Summertime (1955)
2011年,在线网站《赫芬顿邮报》的撰稿人melanie notkin写了一篇题为《“职业女性”是新的“旋转者”吗。她问他:“为什么我们是‘职业女性’,而你只是一个在爱情中运气不佳的人?”。“我不是一个‘职业女性’,”她宣称。“我在寻找爱。”令人惊讶(也有点沮丧)的是,诺特金的简短专栏文章的标题含蓄地重述了孤独职业女性的刻板印象,她的职业很难替代男性。然而,它预见到了最近的趋势,即恢复“老处女”一词,并将其重新用于女权主义研究和后女权主义。凯特·博利克(Kate Bolick)的《Spinster:Making a Life of One’s Own》(2015)对她自己和其他女性的单身生活进行了审视,并登上了《纽约时报》畅销书排行榜,布里艾伦·霍珀(Briallen Hopper)的《难以爱:随笔与自白》(2019)以打破异性恋浪漫和婚姻作为女性领导和评估生活标准的方式,探索并重新审视了这位年轻人。这个词对邋遢、缺乏性吸引力和女性非法性的负面含义一直持续到21世纪,这在很大程度上要归功于经典好莱坞电影在大众想象中延续这些刻板印象方面所扮演的角色。然而,正如对大卫·利恩1955年电影《夏日时光》的研究所表明的那样,作为一种测试案例,一些世纪中期的老处女叙事中包含了他们自己开垦的种子,尤其是当从21世纪的有利位置重新观看时。这项案例研究了解了这部电影的制作和接受历史,但也得益于当今的数字观看实践,它断言,在电影最初上映六十五年多后,在夏季和夏季的多次凝视与凯瑟琳·赫本的明星话语相吻合,产生了一种占有欲强的女权主义观众。如今,用新媒体技术观看研究不足的《夏日》,会在电影消费过程中产生意义生产模式,这种模式在早期的老处女叙事或传统好莱坞电影中都没有被探索过,而本案例研究最终探索的正是这些动态。电影理论家劳拉·马尔维(Laura Mulvey)将电影称为“每秒24倍的死亡”,指的是大卫·莱恩(David Lean)的《夏日》(Summertime)(1955年)中24小时的标准放映速度:《占有的旁观者》(the Possession Spectator)、《旋转叙事》(Spinster Narrative)和凯瑟琳·赫本(Katharine Hepburn)
{"title":"To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean's Summertime (1955)","authors":"Alison L. Mckee","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0026","url":null,"abstract":"in 2011 melanie notkin, a contributor to the online site HuffPost, wrote an opinion piece titled “Is ‘Career Woman’ the New ‘Spinster’?” In it she recounts a conversation with a man who explained her singleness (more to himself than to her) as a function of her being a career woman. “Why are we ‘career women’ but you’re just a guy who hasn’t been lucky in love?” she asks him. “I’m not a ‘career woman,’” she declares. “I’m looking for love.” Surprising (and somewhat depressing) for its implicit recapitulation of the stereotype of the lonely career woman whose occupation is a poor substitute for a man, the title of Notkin’s brief op-ed nevertheless anticipates the recent trend to rehabilitate the term “spinster” and repurpose it for feminist studies and post-feminism. Kate Bolick’s Spinster: Making a Life of One’s Own (2015), an examination of her own and other women’s single lives, made The New York Times best-seller list, and Briallen Hopper’s Hard to Love: Essays and Confessions (2019) explores and reclaims the spinster in ways that demolish heterosexual romance and marriage as the standard by which women lead and assess their lives. That the term’s negative connotations of dowdiness, lack of sexual appeal, and illegitimacy as a woman persist into the twenty-first century is due in no small measure to the role that classical Hollywood film in particular played in perpetuating these stereotypes in the popular imagination. Yet as this examination of David Lean’s 1955 film Summertime suggests, as a kind of test case, some mid-century spinster narratives contain within them the seeds of their own reclamation, particularly when watched anew from the vantage point of the twenty-first century. Informed by a history of the film’s production and reception, yet also enabled by current-day digital viewing practices, this case study asserts that multiple gazes in and at Summertime dovetail with Katharine Hepburn star discourses to produce a possessive feminist spectator more than sixty-five years after the film’s original release. A present-day viewing of the under-studied Summertime with new media technologies leads to modes of meaning production in the course of the film’s consumption in ways that have not been previously explored in earlier spinster narratives or in classical Hollywood cinema generally, and it is these dynamics that this case study ultimately explores. Film theorist Laura Mulvey has dubbed cinema “death 24x a times a second,” a reference to the standard projection speed of twenty-four To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean’s Summertime (1955)","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"26 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44116417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
UFVA's 2020 Virtual Conference: A Path Forward UFVA 2020虚拟会议:前进之路
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-06-11 DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0003
Laura Vázquez, Wenhwa Ts'ao, Hannah Goodwin, Alison L. Mckee, I. Radzinski
{"title":"UFVA's 2020 Virtual Conference: A Path Forward","authors":"Laura Vázquez, Wenhwa Ts'ao, Hannah Goodwin, Alison L. Mckee, I. Radzinski","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"10 - 11 - 25 - 26 - 3 - 45 - 46 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48197205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From the Opening Sequence of Citizen Kane to the Final Shot of The Birds: A Filmic Microanalysis of Three Painted Scenes 从《公民凯恩》的片头到《群鸟》的最后镜头:三幅画的电影微观分析
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-02-13 DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0033
Dario Lanza Vidal
{"title":"From the Opening Sequence of Citizen Kane to the Final Shot of The Birds: A Filmic Microanalysis of Three Painted Scenes","authors":"Dario Lanza Vidal","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"33 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48699346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"I'm Taken … by Myself": Romantic Crisis in the Self-Centered Indie Rom-Com “我被我自己带走了”:以自我为中心的独立浪漫喜剧中的浪漫危机
IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-02-13 DOI: 10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0003
Beatriz Oria, L. Soberon, Dario Lanza Vidal, D. Dubois
{"title":"\"I'm Taken … by Myself\": Romantic Crisis in the Self-Centered Indie Rom-Com","authors":"Beatriz Oria, L. Soberon, Dario Lanza Vidal, D. Dubois","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.1.0003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"17 - 18 - 3 - 32 - 33 - 47 - 48 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48292771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1