Sandro De Freitas Nascimento, Manolita Correia Lima, Igor Jordano Cassemiro Gondim
Objective of the study: This study aimed to investigate how collaboration between actors in the innovation ecosystem is related to the transfer of knowledge between institutions.Methodology/Approach: The study units were the innovation hubs of the Federal Institutes of Education, Science and Technology in Brazil accredited by Embrapii. The methodological approach of the research was qualitative; the method employed was the multiple-case study; the data collection was conducted through semistructured interviews with representatives from academia, company, government, and society; and the results were obtained via content analysis.Originality/Relevance: Based on the findings of this research, it was possible to elaborate an analytical model to relate the level of collaboration and transfer of knowledge between agents of the innovation ecosystem.Main Results: The main results indicated that the collaboration between the actors was related to the transfer of knowledge through the creation and expansion of the established partnerships as well as the management of the facilitators and difficulty of this relationship.Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: The theoretical contribution was the proposition of an integrated analytical model of collaborative relations and knowledge transfer between members of the innovation ecosystem.Management/Social Contributions: The managerial contribution of the study was the identification of key aspects to improve the collaborative relationship between the actors of the innovation and knowledge transfer ecosystem. The social contribution consists of the possibility of collaboration expansion and knowledge transfer by enhancing the facilitating factors and minimizing the difficulties identified in the researched innovation ecosystems.
{"title":"Level of collaboration and knowledge transfer among actors of the innovation ecosystem: the proposition of an analytical model","authors":"Sandro De Freitas Nascimento, Manolita Correia Lima, Igor Jordano Cassemiro Gondim","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i3.21057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i3.21057","url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study: This study aimed to investigate how collaboration between actors in the innovation ecosystem is related to the transfer of knowledge between institutions.Methodology/Approach: The study units were the innovation hubs of the Federal Institutes of Education, Science and Technology in Brazil accredited by Embrapii. The methodological approach of the research was qualitative; the method employed was the multiple-case study; the data collection was conducted through semistructured interviews with representatives from academia, company, government, and society; and the results were obtained via content analysis.Originality/Relevance: Based on the findings of this research, it was possible to elaborate an analytical model to relate the level of collaboration and transfer of knowledge between agents of the innovation ecosystem.Main Results: The main results indicated that the collaboration between the actors was related to the transfer of knowledge through the creation and expansion of the established partnerships as well as the management of the facilitators and difficulty of this relationship.Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: The theoretical contribution was the proposition of an integrated analytical model of collaborative relations and knowledge transfer between members of the innovation ecosystem.Management/Social Contributions: The managerial contribution of the study was the identification of key aspects to improve the collaborative relationship between the actors of the innovation and knowledge transfer ecosystem. The social contribution consists of the possibility of collaboration expansion and knowledge transfer by enhancing the facilitating factors and minimizing the difficulties identified in the researched innovation ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44658616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective of the Study: To analyze the role of social capital in developing sustainable micro-entrepreneurship among rural women. In addition, it also interprets the conceptual understanding of social capital, micro-entrepreneurship development, and the determinants that promote micro-entrepreneurship have been discussed. Relevance/Originality: There are numerous ways to achieve entrepreneurship, but social capital is one way to develop entrepreneurship. Social capital consists of mutual trust, understanding, reciprocity, social relation, collective actions, etc., among its group members.Methodology/Approach: This article presents a conceptual, theoretical framework by scrutinizing the archive literature to comprehend social capital's role in developing sustainable micro-entrepreneurship. Three forms of social capital, namely Self Help Group, SHG federation, and NGO, have been considered for this study. These social capitals then correlate with each of the indicators of micro-entrepreneurship identified and examined the role of social capital in developing sustainable micro-entrepreneurship among rural women.Main Results: Three forms of social capital such as SHG, SHG federation, and NGO that have been taken for this study, contributes to sustainable micro-entrepreneurship in various ways, i.e. SHG and SHG federation help in achieving social factors and financial inclusion, whereas NGOs provide entrepreneurial training and suitable business network for the women-owned enterprises. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: This study contributes to developing a theoretical framework by analyzing the pieces of literature that contribute to sustainable micro-entrepreneurship development through social capital. Social/management contributions: Social capital promotes sustainable micro-entrepreneurship, which leads to the employment generation, generates regular sources of income, addresses multiple social and economic issues, and promotes a better means of livelihood for rural women.
{"title":"The role of social capital in developing sustainable micro-entrepreneurship among rural women in India: a theoretical framework","authors":"Jogeswar Mahato, M. Jha, Saurabh Verma","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i3.21771","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i3.21771","url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the Study: To analyze the role of social capital in developing sustainable micro-entrepreneurship among rural women. In addition, it also interprets the conceptual understanding of social capital, micro-entrepreneurship development, and the determinants that promote micro-entrepreneurship have been discussed. Relevance/Originality: There are numerous ways to achieve entrepreneurship, but social capital is one way to develop entrepreneurship. Social capital consists of mutual trust, understanding, reciprocity, social relation, collective actions, etc., among its group members.Methodology/Approach: This article presents a conceptual, theoretical framework by scrutinizing the archive literature to comprehend social capital's role in developing sustainable micro-entrepreneurship. Three forms of social capital, namely Self Help Group, SHG federation, and NGO, have been considered for this study. These social capitals then correlate with each of the indicators of micro-entrepreneurship identified and examined the role of social capital in developing sustainable micro-entrepreneurship among rural women.Main Results: Three forms of social capital such as SHG, SHG federation, and NGO that have been taken for this study, contributes to sustainable micro-entrepreneurship in various ways, i.e. SHG and SHG federation help in achieving social factors and financial inclusion, whereas NGOs provide entrepreneurial training and suitable business network for the women-owned enterprises. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: This study contributes to developing a theoretical framework by analyzing the pieces of literature that contribute to sustainable micro-entrepreneurship development through social capital. Social/management contributions: Social capital promotes sustainable micro-entrepreneurship, which leads to the employment generation, generates regular sources of income, addresses multiple social and economic issues, and promotes a better means of livelihood for rural women.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42842669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective of the study: The objective of this theoretical essay is to propose an integrative framework for analyzing value creation and capture in innovation ecosystems.Methodology: This is a theoretical essay based on a narrative review of the concepts of innovation ecosystems, value creation, and value capture.Originality/Relevance: The article theoretically contributes to the analysis of value creation and capture by comparing and contrasting the platform and territorial approaches in innovation ecosystems.Main results: In analyzing the creation and capture of value in innovation ecosystems, the theoretical similarities and differences between the territorial and platform approaches must be considered. Thus, strategies for creating and capturing value must be designed procedurally, according to each stage of the innovation ecosystem's life cycle. Furthermore, value creation and capture strategies must be aligned, and actors must develop individual and collective mechanisms to create and capture the value in the innovation ecosystem, which can be viewed as a multidimensional value (economic, social, cultural or environmental).Theoretical/methodological contributions: The article provides a conceptual framework as well as six theoretical propositions for analyzing value creation and capture in innovation ecosystems.Social/management contributions: The article assists companies, governments, universities, and non-governmental organization managers in considering both the creation and capture of value as drivers for action in innovation ecosystems.
{"title":"Criação e captura de valor em ecossistemas de inovação","authors":"C. Santos, A. Zen","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i3.21470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i3.21470","url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study: The objective of this theoretical essay is to propose an integrative framework for analyzing value creation and capture in innovation ecosystems.Methodology: This is a theoretical essay based on a narrative review of the concepts of innovation ecosystems, value creation, and value capture.Originality/Relevance: The article theoretically contributes to the analysis of value creation and capture by comparing and contrasting the platform and territorial approaches in innovation ecosystems.Main results: In analyzing the creation and capture of value in innovation ecosystems, the theoretical similarities and differences between the territorial and platform approaches must be considered. Thus, strategies for creating and capturing value must be designed procedurally, according to each stage of the innovation ecosystem's life cycle. Furthermore, value creation and capture strategies must be aligned, and actors must develop individual and collective mechanisms to create and capture the value in the innovation ecosystem, which can be viewed as a multidimensional value (economic, social, cultural or environmental).Theoretical/methodological contributions: The article provides a conceptual framework as well as six theoretical propositions for analyzing value creation and capture in innovation ecosystems.Social/management contributions: The article assists companies, governments, universities, and non-governmental organization managers in considering both the creation and capture of value as drivers for action in innovation ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45631546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective of the study: This study aims to identify the effect of decision making on the relationship between the energy source and the establishment of the sales price in electricity auctions for the selection of auction projects.Methodology / approach: Statistical tests were performed on an auction base that concentrates the majority of energy auctions held in the Brazilian market. The relationships between the establishment of the sales price and energy sources and the moderating effect of power, hours of operation, and period of use on this main relationship were evaluated.Originality / Relevance: The formation of a portfolio of electric energy projects through the prior selection of energy auction projects, via a multi-criteria decision-making process, is a valid strategy for companies in the sector.Main results: It was identified that there is awareness of the sales price based on the energy source and relevant criteria for decision making, such as capacity and implementation period.Theoretical-methodological contributions: This study contributes to a process of analysis and preparation of the secondary database of electricity auctions made available by the Electric Energy Commercialization Chamber (CCEE). The theoretical contribution is made by enabling the use of multi-criteria processes for decision making.Contributions to Society / management: Managers can use the methodology applied in this study to create a portfolio of projects with less risk for decision making.
{"title":"Seleção de projetos de energia: o efeito da tomada de decisão na relação entre fonte de energia e preço de venda","authors":"Lincoln Sposito, F. Serra","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i3.20308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i3.20308","url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study: This study aims to identify the effect of decision making on the relationship between the energy source and the establishment of the sales price in electricity auctions for the selection of auction projects.Methodology / approach: Statistical tests were performed on an auction base that concentrates the majority of energy auctions held in the Brazilian market. The relationships between the establishment of the sales price and energy sources and the moderating effect of power, hours of operation, and period of use on this main relationship were evaluated.Originality / Relevance: The formation of a portfolio of electric energy projects through the prior selection of energy auction projects, via a multi-criteria decision-making process, is a valid strategy for companies in the sector.Main results: It was identified that there is awareness of the sales price based on the energy source and relevant criteria for decision making, such as capacity and implementation period.Theoretical-methodological contributions: This study contributes to a process of analysis and preparation of the secondary database of electricity auctions made available by the Electric Energy Commercialization Chamber (CCEE). The theoretical contribution is made by enabling the use of multi-criteria processes for decision making.Contributions to Society / management: Managers can use the methodology applied in this study to create a portfolio of projects with less risk for decision making.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46832101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To understand the patent valuation practices developed in the academic context to promote innovation.Methodology: A systematic review of the literature was carried out from the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science using specific search strings, in which 377 works were found. After applying the defined criteria, eight articles were analyzed.Originality: The study is justified due to the importance of understanding the valuation of academic patents as an inducer of innovation.Main results: The results led to a current understanding of perspectives related to the valuation of academic patents on two fronts: models of academic patent valuation and managerial practices of patent valuation in order to promote innovation.Theoretical-methodological contributions: The research presents an incremental theoretical contribution in the area of valuation of academic patents.Social/Managerial Contributions: Academic patent valuation practices are important mechanisms to induce technological innovation by universities, and the gains are generally defined in the form of royalties.
目的:了解学术背景下促进创新的专利价值评估实践。方法:采用特定的检索字符串，从科学数据库Scopus和Web of Science对文献进行系统综述，共发现377篇文献。在应用定义的标准后，对8篇文章进行了分析。原创性:这项研究是合理的，因为理解学术专利作为创新诱导因素的价值的重要性。主要研究结果:研究结果从学术专利评估模型和促进创新的专利评估管理实践两个方面对与学术专利评估相关的观点有了当前的认识。理论方法贡献:本研究在学术专利评估领域提出了增量理论贡献。社会/管理贡献:学术专利评估实践是诱导大学技术创新的重要机制，其收益通常以特许权使用费的形式确定。
{"title":"Práticas gerenciais de valoração de patentes acadêmicas","authors":"Tiago Daniel Soares Silva, S. Russo","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i2.21590","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.21590","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To understand the patent valuation practices developed in the academic context to promote innovation.Methodology: A systematic review of the literature was carried out from the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science using specific search strings, in which 377 works were found. After applying the defined criteria, eight articles were analyzed.Originality: The study is justified due to the importance of understanding the valuation of academic patents as an inducer of innovation.Main results: The results led to a current understanding of perspectives related to the valuation of academic patents on two fronts: models of academic patent valuation and managerial practices of patent valuation in order to promote innovation.Theoretical-methodological contributions: The research presents an incremental theoretical contribution in the area of valuation of academic patents.Social/Managerial Contributions: Academic patent valuation practices are important mechanisms to induce technological innovation by universities, and the gains are generally defined in the form of royalties.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48806335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. A. Paschoalin Filho, Giberto Tarciso Bottan, Gustavo S. Mesch, António José Guerner Dias, F. López-Pérez, Wilson Levy Braga da Silva Neto
Objective: This research presents the construction and evaluation of a recycling device designed based on the Theory of Fun to collect plastic waste.Originality/relevance: This device consists of an instrumented "dump," which, after its use, communicates with the user, thanking the deposition of the waste and offering content in the form of audio about issues involving the theme of sustainability.Methodology: To evaluate the prototype, generic brands were attached to it as the device's sponsors. A QR code system was also implemented in the prototype, which, after being accessed by the user, would lead the user to a website in which objectives of the project were reported. The prototype was set in public squares and places strategically chosen due to people's traffic. After installation, the artifact was monitored, and its efficiency was evaluated concerning the impact caused on the prospected local community. To verify users' preference, the device was installed in each studied location, next to a conventional wastebasket provided by the city.Main results: Through the analyses, it was possible to verify the preference for using the prototype concerning conventional dumps. Users were also attentive to the brands disclosed, which indicates that the device under studyTheoretical/methodological contributions: This way, it can be figured out that the obtained data are adherent to the Theory of Fun postulates, and the studied bin can realize as an example of equipment designed for interaction with the users and, at the same time, disclosing to them information about sustainabilitySocial/management contributions: The prototype can also be used as an educational tool in elementary schools.
目的:研究基于乐趣理论设计的塑料垃圾回收装置的构建与评价。原创性/相关性:该装置由一个装有仪器的“垃圾场”组成，在使用后，它与用户沟通，感谢废物的沉积，并以音频形式提供有关可持续发展主题的内容。方法:为了评估原型，将仿制品牌作为设备的赞助商附加在原型上。在原型中还实现了一个QR码系统，在用户访问后，将用户引导到一个网站，其中报告了项目的目标。原型被设置在公共广场和根据人们的交通策略选择的地方。安装之后，对工件进行监控，并根据对预期的当地社区造成的影响评估其效率。为了验证用户的偏好，该设备被安装在每个研究地点，旁边是城市提供的传统废纸篓。主要结果:通过分析，可以验证对常规转储使用原型的偏好。用户也注意到所披露的品牌，这表明所研究的设备在理论/方法上的贡献:这样，可以看出所获得的数据符合Theory of Fun的假设，所研究的垃圾箱可以实现作为一个与用户互动的设备的例子，同时向他们披露有关可持续性的信息。社会/管理贡献:这个原型也可以作为小学的教育工具使用。
{"title":"Conception and assessment of a device for voluntary selective collecting: an urban ludic intervention","authors":"J. A. Paschoalin Filho, Giberto Tarciso Bottan, Gustavo S. Mesch, António José Guerner Dias, F. López-Pérez, Wilson Levy Braga da Silva Neto","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i2.21778","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.21778","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This research presents the construction and evaluation of a recycling device designed based on the Theory of Fun to collect plastic waste.Originality/relevance: This device consists of an instrumented \"dump,\" which, after its use, communicates with the user, thanking the deposition of the waste and offering content in the form of audio about issues involving the theme of sustainability.Methodology: To evaluate the prototype, generic brands were attached to it as the device's sponsors. A QR code system was also implemented in the prototype, which, after being accessed by the user, would lead the user to a website in which objectives of the project were reported. The prototype was set in public squares and places strategically chosen due to people's traffic. After installation, the artifact was monitored, and its efficiency was evaluated concerning the impact caused on the prospected local community. To verify users' preference, the device was installed in each studied location, next to a conventional wastebasket provided by the city.Main results: Through the analyses, it was possible to verify the preference for using the prototype concerning conventional dumps. Users were also attentive to the brands disclosed, which indicates that the device under studyTheoretical/methodological contributions: This way, it can be figured out that the obtained data are adherent to the Theory of Fun postulates, and the studied bin can realize as an example of equipment designed for interaction with the users and, at the same time, disclosing to them information about sustainabilitySocial/management contributions: The prototype can also be used as an educational tool in elementary schools. ","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48816130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Newton da Silva Miranda Junior, L. Viana, D. Carneiro, Renan Costa Filgueiras, Gislayne Da Silva Goulart
Objective: We have analyzed Brazil’s initial COVID-19 combat actions by the regional innovation ecosystem actors.Methodology/approach: This is a descriptive and qualitative study using documentary research. In total, 471 reports collected via web scraping were submitted to content analysis (using a codebook and intercoder test) and correspondence analysis.Originality/relevance: From an innovation ecosystem perspective, this study fulfills an identified need to understand how different actors have proposed initial solutions to the COVID-19 pandemic, considering different geographic regions.Main results: According to the seminal literature, in the more economically and socially favored regions, the government-industry dyadic model was corroborated, while in the less favored regions, the most innovative actors were universities and society. Our results have not shown the quintuple helix’s performance, which leads us to ponder the use of this model in crises. Furthermore, although the quadruple helix model was observed in our analyses, in the Brazilian geographic regions the helices were not designed in a transversal way.Theoretical contributions: We propose that the geography of a pandemic combat occurs unevenly by the innovation ecosystem actors. Moreover, the helices ordering refers to the theoretical development process and not to the complementarity of the role between actors.Practical implications: This article highlights the need for integrated management of the innovation ecosystem’s initial actions in a pandemic, preventing regions from being neglected, especially those with lower levels of wealth or quality of life.
{"title":"Initial actions of the Brazilian regional innovation ecosystem against the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Newton da Silva Miranda Junior, L. Viana, D. Carneiro, Renan Costa Filgueiras, Gislayne Da Silva Goulart","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i2.21576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.21576","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We have analyzed Brazil’s initial COVID-19 combat actions by the regional innovation ecosystem actors.Methodology/approach: This is a descriptive and qualitative study using documentary research. In total, 471 reports collected via web scraping were submitted to content analysis (using a codebook and intercoder test) and correspondence analysis.Originality/relevance: From an innovation ecosystem perspective, this study fulfills an identified need to understand how different actors have proposed initial solutions to the COVID-19 pandemic, considering different geographic regions.Main results: According to the seminal literature, in the more economically and socially favored regions, the government-industry dyadic model was corroborated, while in the less favored regions, the most innovative actors were universities and society. Our results have not shown the quintuple helix’s performance, which leads us to ponder the use of this model in crises. Furthermore, although the quadruple helix model was observed in our analyses, in the Brazilian geographic regions the helices were not designed in a transversal way.Theoretical contributions: We propose that the geography of a pandemic combat occurs unevenly by the innovation ecosystem actors. Moreover, the helices ordering refers to the theoretical development process and not to the complementarity of the role between actors.Practical implications: This article highlights the need for integrated management of the innovation ecosystem’s initial actions in a pandemic, preventing regions from being neglected, especially those with lower levels of wealth or quality of life.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44289888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alecxandro Pellin, Marcelo Roger Meneghatti, Sandra Mara Stocker Lago
The Objective of the study: To identify incubator managers' understanding and perspectives on the phenomenon of frugal innovation in these institutions.Methodology/approach: This is a qualitative research of exploratory nature, with data collection carried out through semi-structured interviews. The interview transcripts were analyzed using categorization and Similarity Analysis using the Iramuteq software.Originality/Relevance: Given the importance of frugal innovation and its impact on product and service development, it is worth studying this phenomenon in environments that naturally disseminate innovation, since there are still questions to be explored.Main results: The results demonstrate that the term frugal is not used in the day-to-day incubators, however, it was verified the existence of the practice of frugal innovation in these environments. It is concluded that there is a prevalence of a positive view of managers about this type of innovation and that the practice of frugal innovation in the development of products and services is considered a competitive advantage for the incubated ventures.Theoretical and methodological contributions: Contributes to a future research agenda with the themes: of frugal innovation practices; Mobilizing frugal innovation by the lack of resources and; Frugal innovation through apps in technology incubators.Contributions to management: This research allows incubator managers to understand the aspects involving the theme so that they can develop strategic actions for their incubators using frugal innovation.
{"title":"A inovação frugal em incubadoras de empresas: compreensão e perspectivas sob o ponto de vista dos gestores","authors":"Alecxandro Pellin, Marcelo Roger Meneghatti, Sandra Mara Stocker Lago","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i2.21563","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.21563","url":null,"abstract":"The Objective of the study: To identify incubator managers' understanding and perspectives on the phenomenon of frugal innovation in these institutions.Methodology/approach: This is a qualitative research of exploratory nature, with data collection carried out through semi-structured interviews. The interview transcripts were analyzed using categorization and Similarity Analysis using the Iramuteq software.Originality/Relevance: Given the importance of frugal innovation and its impact on product and service development, it is worth studying this phenomenon in environments that naturally disseminate innovation, since there are still questions to be explored.Main results: The results demonstrate that the term frugal is not used in the day-to-day incubators, however, it was verified the existence of the practice of frugal innovation in these environments. It is concluded that there is a prevalence of a positive view of managers about this type of innovation and that the practice of frugal innovation in the development of products and services is considered a competitive advantage for the incubated ventures.Theoretical and methodological contributions: Contributes to a future research agenda with the themes: of frugal innovation practices; Mobilizing frugal innovation by the lack of resources and; Frugal innovation through apps in technology incubators.Contributions to management: This research allows incubator managers to understand the aspects involving the theme so that they can develop strategic actions for their incubators using frugal innovation. ","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48384426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Based on international scientific literature, the research seeks to understand the interface between the subjects of networks, collaborations, and the front end of innovation (FEI).Methodology/approach: Two systematic reviews were carried out, seeking articles published from 2010 onward in the EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases.Originality/Relevance: The article contributes to studies within the themes of networks, especially focused on collaboration that support the front end of innovation. The research was limited to understanding networks in the context of entrepreneurship. Therefore, there is opportunity for future analysis in other contexts.Main results: The study selected 49 articles published from 2010 onward, revealing complementarity within the fields studied.Theoretical/methodological contributions: The articles that discuss the context of collaboration in the front end of innovation address topics that are interconnected, such as “social networks,” “theory of knowledge,” and “open innovation.”Social/management contributions: It was possible to identify elements that influence a network, such as the region’s cultural and material structure, and aspects regarding the relationships established in the network, particularly individual predispositions and the strength of the ties.
目的：基于国际科学文献，本研究旨在了解网络、合作和创新前端（FEI）主题之间的接口。方法/方法：进行了两次系统综述，寻找2010年以后在EBSCO、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中发表的文章。原创性/相关性：这篇文章有助于网络主题的研究，特别是关注支持创新前端的合作。这项研究仅限于理解创业背景下的网络。因此，未来有机会在其他背景下进行分析。主要结果：该研究选择了2010年以后发表的49篇文章，揭示了所研究领域的互补性。理论/方法论贡献：讨论创新前端合作背景的文章涉及相互关联的主题，如“社交网络”、“知识理论”和“开放创新”。社会/管理贡献：可以确定影响网络的因素，例如该地区的文化和物质结构，以及与网络中建立的关系有关的方面，特别是个人倾向和关系的强度。
{"title":"Redes de promoção às colaborações no front end da inovação: uma revisão sistemática da literatura","authors":"Camila Ferreira, Dannyela da Cunha Lemos","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i2.21525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.21525","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Based on international scientific literature, the research seeks to understand the interface between the subjects of networks, collaborations, and the front end of innovation (FEI).Methodology/approach: Two systematic reviews were carried out, seeking articles published from 2010 onward in the EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases.Originality/Relevance: The article contributes to studies within the themes of networks, especially focused on collaboration that support the front end of innovation. The research was limited to understanding networks in the context of entrepreneurship. Therefore, there is opportunity for future analysis in other contexts.Main results: The study selected 49 articles published from 2010 onward, revealing complementarity within the fields studied.Theoretical/methodological contributions: The articles that discuss the context of collaboration in the front end of innovation address topics that are interconnected, such as “social networks,” “theory of knowledge,” and “open innovation.”Social/management contributions: It was possible to identify elements that influence a network, such as the region’s cultural and material structure, and aspects regarding the relationships established in the network, particularly individual predispositions and the strength of the ties.","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44180654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Angélica Pigola, P. R. Costa, M. Mazieri, I. Scafuto
Collaborative innovation become one of the most strategy decision across firms and a well-defined phenomenon that became popular among practitioners and researchers (A. S. Cui O’Connor, 2012; Liu et al., 2017). Many theories were considered to explain collaboration phenomena such as resources-based view, organization theory, strategy, information processing theory, the economic theory of complementarities among others (Barney, 1991; Cassiman Veugelers, 2006; Daft Lengel, 1986; Milgrom Roberts, 1995; Tushman Nadler, 1978). However, technology advances provide new variations in collaboration to innovativeness. For example, collaborative activities with suppliers and customers (Karhade Dong, 2021), community source projects (Liu et al., 2017) or collaboration with distant partners (T. Cui et al., 2020), corporate engagement with startups (Shankar Shepherd, 2019), innovation networks (Aarikka-Stenroos et al., 2017), and innovation ecosystems (Granstrand Holgersson, 2020).Collaborative innovation takes over the existence of an inter-organizational activities executed by people that together perform with high level of interdependence something innovative (T. Cui et al., 2020; Davis Eisenhardt, 2011). Some authors (Adner Kapoor, 2010; T. Cui et al., 2020; Rico et al., 2008) highlight that this interdependence is characterized along two dimensions: technological and behavioral. Technological interdependence is linked to knowledge and the exchange of resources for research and development, and behavioral interdependence is associated with the field of communication, social interaction between collaborative actors and the coordination of these relationships to innovate.Other perspectives in the literature explain and theorize about collaborative innovation as knowledge-sharing trajectories (Majchrzak Malhotra, 2016; Trkman Desouza, 2012), or multi-actor collaboration (Torfing, 2019), or building collaborative capabilities (Swink, 2006) among other approaches. In this editorial, we bring some thoughts and idea about collaborative innovation under a technological perspective to incentive researchers to go beyond in innovative technologies research embedded in collaboration.Collaboration efforts also became a common way of firms to enhance innovations and its technological development with clear determinants about their beneficial effects, and therefore, the literature is well stablished in this subject (Pereira et al., 2018). However, collaboration only succeeds when technological resources and capabilities are combined, and parties define jointly how to enhance and use them accordingly (Snow, 2015).Collaborative innovation as a new technological paradigm refers to a network innovation model supported by interactions of multiple parties such as enterprises, universities and research institutions as core elements and government, financial institutions, nonprofit organizations, intermediaries as auxiliary elements (W. Zhang et al., 2021). Notwithstanding, col
协同创新成为企业最具战略性的决策之一，也是一种在从业者和研究人员中流行的明确现象（a.S.Cui O'Connor，2012；刘等人，2017）。许多理论被认为可以解释协作现象，如基于资源的观点、组织理论、战略、信息处理理论、互补性经济理论等（Barney，1991；Cassiman-Veugelers，2006；Daft Lengel，1986；Milgrom-Roberts，1995；Tushman Nadler，1978）。然而，技术进步为合作创新提供了新的变化。例如，与供应商和客户的合作活动（Karhade Dong，2021）、社区来源项目（Liu et al.，2017）或与远方合作伙伴的合作（T.Cui et al.，2020）、企业与初创公司的合作（Shankar-Sherpherd，2019）、创新网络（Aarikka Stenroos et al，和创新生态系统（Granstrad-Holgersson，2020）。协作创新接管了由人们执行的组织间活动的存在，这些活动在高度相互依存的情况下共同表现出创新性的东西（T.Cui et al.，2020；Davis Eisenhardt，2011）。一些作者（Adner Kapoor，2010；T.Cui等人，2020；Rico等人，2008）强调，这种相互依存关系有两个维度：技术和行为。技术相互依存关系到知识和研发资源的交换，行为相互依存关系涉及沟通领域、合作参与者之间的社会互动以及协调这些关系以进行创新。文献中的其他观点将协作创新解释为知识共享轨迹并将其理论化（Majchrzak-Malhotra，2016；Trkman-Desouza，2012），或多参与者协作（Torfing，2019），或构建协作能力（Swink，2006）等方法。在这篇社论中，我们从技术的角度提出了一些关于合作创新的想法和想法，以激励研究人员超越合作中的创新技术研究。合作努力也成为企业加强创新及其技术发展的一种常见方式，其有益效果具有明确的决定因素，因此，在这一主题上的文献已经很好地建立起来（Pereira等人，2018）。然而，只有当技术资源和能力相结合，各方共同定义如何相应地增强和使用它们时，协作才会成功（Snow，2015）。协作创新作为一种新的技术范式，是指由企业等多方互动支持的网络创新模式，大学和研究机构为核心要素，政府、金融机构、非营利组织、中介机构为辅助要素（W.Zhang et al.，2021）。尽管如此，在不同组织级别中运行的协作网络以各种模式和进化特征存在，它们需要网络组成中的不同参与者和能力，才能在某些情况下成为开发技术的显著资产，并在之后获得专利（Gomes et al.，2017）。面对创新轨迹中的失败风险，企业投资于合作举措，试图减轻成本影响，在技术生命周期开发过程中分担责任并提高技术性能。因此，技术联盟是实现这些目标的有用手段（Kim Song，2007）。技术联盟对于实现数字化转型和创新至关重要。简言之，张等人（2021）强调技术联盟是一种自愿的企业间合作，通过共享和交换这些技术来共同开发技术，以满足业务需求（W.Zhang et al.，2021）。各种技术领域的合作有助于带来异质知识、互补资源，以及提高创新绩效的能力（Swink，2006；W.Zhang等人，2021）。在创新本质上是知识创造的观点下（Nonaka，1994），通过技术视角的协同创新可能由创新过程生命周期中产生的知识的生成、共享、集成和利用的不同活动、过程或例程来配置（Nonaka，1994；W.Zhang等人，2021）。此外，这种活动、过程或例程的配置支持进化技术能力的发展（Sampson，2007）。在技术创新领域，进化现在在本质上更具协作性（J.Zhang et al.，2019）。协作是技术繁荣的趋势。
{"title":"Collaborative innovation: a technological perspective","authors":"Angélica Pigola, P. R. Costa, M. Mazieri, I. Scafuto","doi":"10.5585/iji.v10i2.22256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i2.22256","url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative innovation become one of the most strategy decision across firms and a well-defined phenomenon that became popular among practitioners and researchers (A. S. Cui O’Connor, 2012; Liu et al., 2017). Many theories were considered to explain collaboration phenomena such as resources-based view, organization theory, strategy, information processing theory, the economic theory of complementarities among others (Barney, 1991; Cassiman Veugelers, 2006; Daft Lengel, 1986; Milgrom Roberts, 1995; Tushman Nadler, 1978). However, technology advances provide new variations in collaboration to innovativeness. For example, collaborative activities with suppliers and customers (Karhade Dong, 2021), community source projects (Liu et al., 2017) or collaboration with distant partners (T. Cui et al., 2020), corporate engagement with startups (Shankar Shepherd, 2019), innovation networks (Aarikka-Stenroos et al., 2017), and innovation ecosystems (Granstrand Holgersson, 2020).Collaborative innovation takes over the existence of an inter-organizational activities executed by people that together perform with high level of interdependence something innovative (T. Cui et al., 2020; Davis Eisenhardt, 2011). Some authors (Adner Kapoor, 2010; T. Cui et al., 2020; Rico et al., 2008) highlight that this interdependence is characterized along two dimensions: technological and behavioral. Technological interdependence is linked to knowledge and the exchange of resources for research and development, and behavioral interdependence is associated with the field of communication, social interaction between collaborative actors and the coordination of these relationships to innovate.Other perspectives in the literature explain and theorize about collaborative innovation as knowledge-sharing trajectories (Majchrzak Malhotra, 2016; Trkman Desouza, 2012), or multi-actor collaboration (Torfing, 2019), or building collaborative capabilities (Swink, 2006) among other approaches. In this editorial, we bring some thoughts and idea about collaborative innovation under a technological perspective to incentive researchers to go beyond in innovative technologies research embedded in collaboration.Collaboration efforts also became a common way of firms to enhance innovations and its technological development with clear determinants about their beneficial effects, and therefore, the literature is well stablished in this subject (Pereira et al., 2018). However, collaboration only succeeds when technological resources and capabilities are combined, and parties define jointly how to enhance and use them accordingly (Snow, 2015).Collaborative innovation as a new technological paradigm refers to a network innovation model supported by interactions of multiple parties such as enterprises, universities and research institutions as core elements and government, financial institutions, nonprofit organizations, intermediaries as auxiliary elements (W. Zhang et al., 2021). Notwithstanding, col","PeriodicalId":43121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42064261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：