Pub Date : 2020-01-02DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1604242
Nampombe Saurombe
ABSTRACT Archives serve as society’s collective memory in so far as they provide evidence of the past and promote accountability and transparency of past actions. An appreciation of archives would then result in citizens linking archival records with their identity, history, civic duty and cultural heritage. However, research in Eastern and Southern Africa indicates that most citizens are unaware of archives and rarely use them. Apart from financial constraints, this is often associated with inadequate outreach programs. Taking archives to the people (promoting archives) is one way of making citizens aware of archival holdings and facilitating access and use of these resources. Through the application of three research techniques, this article shows that, although the number of archival users in this region is declining, public programming initiatives were not prioritised. Reasons for this included lack of policies; shortage of staff; lack of skills; reluctance to rope in technology in public programming initiatives; working in silos; and budgetary constraints. This article recommends a framework that may help archivists in the Eastern and Southern Regional Branch of the International Council on Archives region to raise awareness about public archival repositories, despite the existing challenges.
{"title":"Taking archives to the people: an examination of public programs in the National Archives of the Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Branch of the International Council on Archives","authors":"Nampombe Saurombe","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1604242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1604242","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Archives serve as society’s collective memory in so far as they provide evidence of the past and promote accountability and transparency of past actions. An appreciation of archives would then result in citizens linking archival records with their identity, history, civic duty and cultural heritage. However, research in Eastern and Southern Africa indicates that most citizens are unaware of archives and rarely use them. Apart from financial constraints, this is often associated with inadequate outreach programs. Taking archives to the people (promoting archives) is one way of making citizens aware of archival holdings and facilitating access and use of these resources. Through the application of three research techniques, this article shows that, although the number of archival users in this region is declining, public programming initiatives were not prioritised. Reasons for this included lack of policies; shortage of staff; lack of skills; reluctance to rope in technology in public programming initiatives; working in silos; and budgetary constraints. This article recommends a framework that may help archivists in the Eastern and Southern Regional Branch of the International Council on Archives region to raise awareness about public archival repositories, despite the existing challenges.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"48 1","pages":"25 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1604242","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49004492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-02DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2020.1711606
Viviane Frings‐Hessami
In May 2019, a well-known archival commentator posted on Twitter a message that questioned how it was possible that a ‘dude’ that they did not know could suggest that we had come to ‘the end of archival ideas’ and dismiss all the work done by the current wave of archival scholars. That tweet was retweeted several dozens of times by their followers. It was referring to a book chapter written by Craig Gauld, Lecturer in Archives and Information Studies at the University of Dundee, entitled ‘The End of Archival Ideas?’, part of the book Archival Futures edited by Caroline Brown. The author of the original tweet (which has since then been deleted) admitted in a later comment that they had not read the work they were commenting about. Most of their followers clearly had not read it either (none of their comments suggested that they had) and liked or retweeted the tweet on the basis of its author’s assumed authority in the archival field. Some of them suggested many names of people who they thought were living proofs that the archival field is flourishing with new thinkers and new ‘ideas’. The problemwith those tweets is not whether or not the authors they listed had come up with new ‘ideas’, but the fact that they rashly condemned Gauld’s argument without having read his paper and tried to understand what he meant by it. In fact, what happened on Twitter in May/June 2019 is a typical illustration of what Gauld was lamenting about in his chapter. Quoting cultural historian Neal Gabler, Gauld wrote that:
{"title":"The end of archival ideas?","authors":"Viviane Frings‐Hessami","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2020.1711606","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2020.1711606","url":null,"abstract":"In May 2019, a well-known archival commentator posted on Twitter a message that questioned how it was possible that a ‘dude’ that they did not know could suggest that we had come to ‘the end of archival ideas’ and dismiss all the work done by the current wave of archival scholars. That tweet was retweeted several dozens of times by their followers. It was referring to a book chapter written by Craig Gauld, Lecturer in Archives and Information Studies at the University of Dundee, entitled ‘The End of Archival Ideas?’, part of the book Archival Futures edited by Caroline Brown. The author of the original tweet (which has since then been deleted) admitted in a later comment that they had not read the work they were commenting about. Most of their followers clearly had not read it either (none of their comments suggested that they had) and liked or retweeted the tweet on the basis of its author’s assumed authority in the archival field. Some of them suggested many names of people who they thought were living proofs that the archival field is flourishing with new thinkers and new ‘ideas’. The problemwith those tweets is not whether or not the authors they listed had come up with new ‘ideas’, but the fact that they rashly condemned Gauld’s argument without having read his paper and tried to understand what he meant by it. In fact, what happened on Twitter in May/June 2019 is a typical illustration of what Gauld was lamenting about in his chapter. Quoting cultural historian Neal Gabler, Gauld wrote that:","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"48 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2020.1711606","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49345772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-02DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1705170
Nicola Laurent, Kirsten Wright
ABSTRACT This article discusses the development of a new online training course, A trauma-informed approach to managing archives, for the Australian Society of Archivists. It outlines why such a course is needed, who its audience is, and provides a brief overview of what is covered. Trauma is pervasive and affects everyone, and this course provides information and training materials about what this means for archives and how archivists can better support people having a trauma reaction. It introduces the concept of trauma-informed practice, expands on that notion to outline what trauma-informed archival practice may look like, and also discusses vicarious trauma and the impacts this may have on archives workers. The article provides information about when the course will be available, and how people will be able to access the course.
{"title":"A trauma-informed approach to managing archives: a new online course","authors":"Nicola Laurent, Kirsten Wright","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1705170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1705170","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article discusses the development of a new online training course, A trauma-informed approach to managing archives, for the Australian Society of Archivists. It outlines why such a course is needed, who its audience is, and provides a brief overview of what is covered. Trauma is pervasive and affects everyone, and this course provides information and training materials about what this means for archives and how archivists can better support people having a trauma reaction. It introduces the concept of trauma-informed practice, expands on that notion to outline what trauma-informed archival practice may look like, and also discusses vicarious trauma and the impacts this may have on archives workers. The article provides information about when the course will be available, and how people will be able to access the course.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"48 1","pages":"80 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1705170","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42639325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-01DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2020.1689326
M. Piggott
{"title":"A matter of facts: the value of evidence in an information age","authors":"M. Piggott","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2020.1689326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2020.1689326","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"48 1","pages":"88 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2020.1689326","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46591441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-09-19DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1668993
C. Jeurgens
Information-philosopher Luciano Floridi once coined the neologism OnLife to characterise our current way of life in what he calls a hyperconnected reality. In his attempts to understand the impact ...
{"title":"Recordkeeping informatics for a networked age","authors":"C. Jeurgens","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1668993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1668993","url":null,"abstract":"Information-philosopher Luciano Floridi once coined the neologism OnLife to characterise our current way of life in what he calls a hyperconnected reality. In his attempts to understand the impact ...","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"48 1","pages":"90 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1668993","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46434111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-11DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1609363
J. Bunn, S. Rayner
ABSTRACT In the call for papers for this special issue, a lack of dialogue was noted between ‘archivists and literary scholars’. This article has arisen from a collaboration across that divide, between two individuals who between them embody multiple identities of archivist and publisher, archival and literary scholar. The purpose of this collaboration was to establish a common frame of reference which would encompass and give equal weight to the concerns and working contexts of both. To assist in this aim, both researchers agreed that neither the field of archives or of literary scholarship would be privileged. The focus in this study is on the relationship between the author and the editor within the academic publishing sector. With these parameters set as the starting point, research questions were drawn up from both perspectives to guide the project. These questions were, to some extent, addressed, but a more important outcome of the process was the development of a common frame of reference in which to continue the dialogue, through a broader and more abstract idea of the scholarly record and not just one of records as material resources for literary scholarship.
{"title":"Observing the author–editor relationship: recordkeeping and literary scholarship in dialogue","authors":"J. Bunn, S. Rayner","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1609363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1609363","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the call for papers for this special issue, a lack of dialogue was noted between ‘archivists and literary scholars’. This article has arisen from a collaboration across that divide, between two individuals who between them embody multiple identities of archivist and publisher, archival and literary scholar. The purpose of this collaboration was to establish a common frame of reference which would encompass and give equal weight to the concerns and working contexts of both. To assist in this aim, both researchers agreed that neither the field of archives or of literary scholarship would be privileged. The focus in this study is on the relationship between the author and the editor within the academic publishing sector. With these parameters set as the starting point, research questions were drawn up from both perspectives to guide the project. These questions were, to some extent, addressed, but a more important outcome of the process was the development of a common frame of reference in which to continue the dialogue, through a broader and more abstract idea of the scholarly record and not just one of records as material resources for literary scholarship.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"47 1","pages":"359 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1609363","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42435522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-11DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1616571
Maria Castrillo
ABSTRACT This essay explores the intersections between literature and new media through the lens of the Discworld computer games based on Sir Terry Pratchett’s novels. Although Pratchett was one of the twentieth century’s most successful authors in the English language, he has been largely absent from literary criticism, chiefly because he was and continues to be perceived as a popular author, a writer for the masses. The popularity of his Discworld series of novels led computer game developers to adapt them to new media in the 1980s and 1990s. The Colin Smythe/Terry Pratchett collection at Senate House Library, University of London, provides a treasure trove of information to understand this aspect of Pratchett’s vast literary and publishing output as a result of the survival of invaluable analogue peripheral records, visual and printed sources which document the creative process and Pratchett’s input. The essay argues that although these digital objects have been largely treated as physical objects and have been mostly retained for their artefactual and anecdotal value, the existence of analogue sources provides a unique opportunity to explore them in more detail, taking into account the historical, social and cultural context that enabled their creation to inform their future digital preservation.
{"title":"‘Missing Presumed’: computer games and digital adventures in the Colin Smythe/Terry Pratchett Collection","authors":"Maria Castrillo","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1616571","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1616571","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay explores the intersections between literature and new media through the lens of the Discworld computer games based on Sir Terry Pratchett’s novels. Although Pratchett was one of the twentieth century’s most successful authors in the English language, he has been largely absent from literary criticism, chiefly because he was and continues to be perceived as a popular author, a writer for the masses. The popularity of his Discworld series of novels led computer game developers to adapt them to new media in the 1980s and 1990s. The Colin Smythe/Terry Pratchett collection at Senate House Library, University of London, provides a treasure trove of information to understand this aspect of Pratchett’s vast literary and publishing output as a result of the survival of invaluable analogue peripheral records, visual and printed sources which document the creative process and Pratchett’s input. The essay argues that although these digital objects have been largely treated as physical objects and have been mostly retained for their artefactual and anecdotal value, the existence of analogue sources provides a unique opportunity to explore them in more detail, taking into account the historical, social and cultural context that enabled their creation to inform their future digital preservation.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"47 1","pages":"343 - 358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1616571","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48039969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-11DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1622138
J. Schneider, C. Adams, S. DeBauche, Reid Echols, C. McKean, J. Moran, D. Waugh
ABSTRACT The email of contemporary literary figures is ripe for research by scholars, and of broad interest to the general public, but can also present many challenges to cultural memory institutions that seek to appraise, process and provide access to this rich archival material. This article explores how five institutions across the United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand are using ePADD, free and open source software developed by Stanford Libraries that incorporates artificial intelligence and machine learning to help meet these challenges for email in contemporary English‐language literary collections. Authors and institutions represented include British poet Wendy Cope (The British Library), British novelist Ian McEwan (Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas at Austin), British Indian novelist and essayist Salman Rushdie (Emory University), American poet Robert Creeley (Stanford University) and New Zealand poet and critic Ian Wedde (National Library of New Zealand). The use cases are followed by a discussion identifying lessons learned and areas for further research.
{"title":"Appraising, processing, and providing access to email in contemporary literary archives","authors":"J. Schneider, C. Adams, S. DeBauche, Reid Echols, C. McKean, J. Moran, D. Waugh","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1622138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1622138","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The email of contemporary literary figures is ripe for research by scholars, and of broad interest to the general public, but can also present many challenges to cultural memory institutions that seek to appraise, process and provide access to this rich archival material. This article explores how five institutions across the United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand are using ePADD, free and open source software developed by Stanford Libraries that incorporates artificial intelligence and machine learning to help meet these challenges for email in contemporary English‐language literary collections. Authors and institutions represented include British poet Wendy Cope (The British Library), British novelist Ian McEwan (Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas at Austin), British Indian novelist and essayist Salman Rushdie (Emory University), American poet Robert Creeley (Stanford University) and New Zealand poet and critic Ian Wedde (National Library of New Zealand). The use cases are followed by a discussion identifying lessons learned and areas for further research.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"47 1","pages":"305 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1622138","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45389341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-11DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1640555
Lise Jaillant
After the digital revolution: Working with emails and born-digital records in literary and publishers’ archives
数字革命后:处理文学和出版商档案中的电子邮件和原生数字记录
{"title":"After the digital revolution: working with emails and born-digital records in literary and publishers’ archives","authors":"Lise Jaillant","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1640555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1640555","url":null,"abstract":"After the digital revolution: Working with emails and born-digital records in literary and publishers’ archives","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"47 1","pages":"285 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1640555","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42457708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-08-11DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2019.1608837
P. Gooding, Jose Smith, J. Mann
ABSTRACT In 2013, Matthew Kirschenbaum advocated for increased collaboration between digital archivists and digital humanities specialists to make the most out of born-digital archives. Since then, researchers and archivists have experimented with innovative interfaces for access to writer’s archives that emerge from individual research cultures and practices. Simultaneously, archives such as the British Archive for Contemporary Writing (BACW) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) are beginning to collect the work of authors who work in inventive digital ways. This article will therefore explore the following question: how might archivists, authors and researchers profitably collaborate to explore the nature of creativity in the born-digital archive, so that both digital preservation and digital scholarship take place? In doing so, the authors look to the complementary fields of genetic criticism and digital humanities to inform the development of archival tools as ‘hermeneutical instruments’. They will explore how such instruments might allow us to read horizontally across archival strata, building on an ‘esthetic of the possible’ to develop a ‘jouer avec les fonds’, supported through collaboration between researchers, archivists and writers. Finally, the authors consider how this approach challenges archival practices, and propose forms of collaboration that might address both archival practice and emerging forms of scholarship.
2013年，Matthew Kirschenbaum提倡加强数字档案工作者和数字人文专家之间的合作，以最大限度地利用数字档案。从那时起，研究人员和档案保管员尝试了一些创新的界面，以访问来自个人研究文化和实践的作家档案。与此同时，东安格利亚大学(UEA)的英国当代写作档案馆(BACW)等档案馆也开始收集以创新的数字方式创作的作者的作品。因此，本文将探讨以下问题:档案工作者、作者和研究人员如何进行有益的合作，以探索数字化档案中创造力的本质，从而实现数字化保存和数字化学术?在这样做的过程中，作者期待着遗传批评和数字人文学科的互补领域，为档案工具作为“解释学工具”的发展提供信息。他们将探索这些工具如何使我们能够横向阅读档案层，建立在“可能的美学”的基础上，通过研究人员、档案工作者和作家之间的合作，开发出一种“jouer average les fonds”。最后，作者考虑了这种方法如何挑战档案实践，并提出了可能解决档案实践和新兴学术形式的合作形式。
{"title":"The forensic imagination: interdisciplinary approaches to tracing creativity in writers’ born-digital archives","authors":"P. Gooding, Jose Smith, J. Mann","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1608837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1608837","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2013, Matthew Kirschenbaum advocated for increased collaboration between digital archivists and digital humanities specialists to make the most out of born-digital archives. Since then, researchers and archivists have experimented with innovative interfaces for access to writer’s archives that emerge from individual research cultures and practices. Simultaneously, archives such as the British Archive for Contemporary Writing (BACW) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) are beginning to collect the work of authors who work in inventive digital ways. This article will therefore explore the following question: how might archivists, authors and researchers profitably collaborate to explore the nature of creativity in the born-digital archive, so that both digital preservation and digital scholarship take place? In doing so, the authors look to the complementary fields of genetic criticism and digital humanities to inform the development of archival tools as ‘hermeneutical instruments’. They will explore how such instruments might allow us to read horizontally across archival strata, building on an ‘esthetic of the possible’ to develop a ‘jouer avec les fonds’, supported through collaboration between researchers, archivists and writers. Finally, the authors consider how this approach challenges archival practices, and propose forms of collaboration that might address both archival practice and emerging forms of scholarship.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"47 1","pages":"374 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1608837","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41500308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：