The economy’s legislative, regulatory, and institutional framework profoundly influences growth. It sets societal norms and motivates economic players towards desired outcomes. Greece faces a complex challenge in enhancing its institutional structure, with interconnected issues demanding comprehensive and persistent intervention. Political stability positively impacts regulatory quality, while instability prompts resistance to government changes, affecting legislation efficacy and governmental honesty. The study identifies two counterproductive forces hindering law improvement. First, the executive power’s reluctance to measure legislative effectiveness Second, there is a pervasive distrust in law enforcers, resulting in convoluted legal frameworks. This setup aligns with statism and a flawed concept of legal certainty. Improving the legal framework requires the executive to prioritize self-assessment of efficacy and trust in law enforcement—a cornerstone of effective liberal democracy. The study advocates specific policy guidelines tailored for the Greek state. Addressing these concerns mandates an all-encompassing, persistent, and introspective approach by those in power. Ultimately, fostering trust, measuring effectiveness, and simplifying legal constructs are vital for Greece to enhance its institutional framework and foster a more effective liberal democracy. Lastly, the provision of training to those who shape and evaluate the laws is crucial to ensure high-quality regulations and interventions.
{"title":"The Legislative Process and Regulatory Interventions in the Greek Democracy: Deep-Rooted Weaknesses and Recommendations for Improvement","authors":"Panagiotis E Petrakis","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmae001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae001","url":null,"abstract":"The economy’s legislative, regulatory, and institutional framework profoundly influences growth. It sets societal norms and motivates economic players towards desired outcomes. Greece faces a complex challenge in enhancing its institutional structure, with interconnected issues demanding comprehensive and persistent intervention. Political stability positively impacts regulatory quality, while instability prompts resistance to government changes, affecting legislation efficacy and governmental honesty. The study identifies two counterproductive forces hindering law improvement. First, the executive power’s reluctance to measure legislative effectiveness Second, there is a pervasive distrust in law enforcers, resulting in convoluted legal frameworks. This setup aligns with statism and a flawed concept of legal certainty. Improving the legal framework requires the executive to prioritize self-assessment of efficacy and trust in law enforcement—a cornerstone of effective liberal democracy. The study advocates specific policy guidelines tailored for the Greek state. Addressing these concerns mandates an all-encompassing, persistent, and introspective approach by those in power. Ultimately, fostering trust, measuring effectiveness, and simplifying legal constructs are vital for Greece to enhance its institutional framework and foster a more effective liberal democracy. Lastly, the provision of training to those who shape and evaluate the laws is crucial to ensure high-quality regulations and interventions.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139647763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The proviso of section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act of 1882, is a regressive law restraining women of certain religions from alienating property received from an inter-vivos transaction. This paper highlights this aspect of the statute and calls for reform in the property rights of such women, as the proviso violates the Indian Constitutional guarantee of preventing gender and religion-based discrimination. Further, the proviso creates an anomaly in the property interest of women who fall within the ambit of both section 10 and the Indian Succession Act. This paper also argues that the mere deletion of the impugned proviso will not address the issue of patriarchy and secure the welfare of women. Dowry is one such example discussed in this paper, which persists despite statutes aimed at eradicating it. The reasons for the existence of section 10, as given by the English Judges of the colonial past, continue to plague Indian women even today. On the contrary, a woman’s absolute interest in property would make her susceptible to dowry abuse, consequently perpetuating the practice of dowry demands. Therefore, in addition to legal reform, this paper advocates increasing efforts in sensitizing society to bring about real change.
{"title":"The Discrimination and Anomaly in the Property Rights of Indian Women","authors":"Aditya Suswaram","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmae002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae002","url":null,"abstract":"The proviso of section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act of 1882, is a regressive law restraining women of certain religions from alienating property received from an inter-vivos transaction. This paper highlights this aspect of the statute and calls for reform in the property rights of such women, as the proviso violates the Indian Constitutional guarantee of preventing gender and religion-based discrimination. Further, the proviso creates an anomaly in the property interest of women who fall within the ambit of both section 10 and the Indian Succession Act. This paper also argues that the mere deletion of the impugned proviso will not address the issue of patriarchy and secure the welfare of women. Dowry is one such example discussed in this paper, which persists despite statutes aimed at eradicating it. The reasons for the existence of section 10, as given by the English Judges of the colonial past, continue to plague Indian women even today. On the contrary, a woman’s absolute interest in property would make her susceptible to dowry abuse, consequently perpetuating the practice of dowry demands. Therefore, in addition to legal reform, this paper advocates increasing efforts in sensitizing society to bring about real change.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139517824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article highlights the state-of-play in law-making in Greece especially following the adoption of law 4622/2019 aiming at establishing a culture of principles and means for enhancing the quality of laws. The revised model for new legislation, as well as the approach taken for the transformation of existing laws into the new model, the so-called codification process, are presented. In this framework, the role of the Hellenic Parliament is discussed and its position vis-à-vis other regulatory authorities is highlighted. The ongoing legislative modernization activities are approached under the light of digital tools and services that are being developed to further advance law-making processes in Greece.
{"title":"Better Regulation and its Evolution in the Hellenic Legislative and Parliamentary System","authors":"Fotios Fitsilis, Georgios Theodorakopoulos","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmae003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae003","url":null,"abstract":"This article highlights the state-of-play in law-making in Greece especially following the adoption of law 4622/2019 aiming at establishing a culture of principles and means for enhancing the quality of laws. The revised model for new legislation, as well as the approach taken for the transformation of existing laws into the new model, the so-called codification process, are presented. In this framework, the role of the Hellenic Parliament is discussed and its position vis-à-vis other regulatory authorities is highlighted. The ongoing legislative modernization activities are approached under the light of digital tools and services that are being developed to further advance law-making processes in Greece.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139517823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of EU regulations requires many changes in the Czech legal order. It is often necessary to repeal incompatible national provisions, provide for new penalties and provisions on competence of national institutions, or set up a new system only sketched by the EU regulations. Further, the implementation in Czechia has to match with the other parts of the Czech legal order to be effective. And it must comply with the Czech constitutional imperatives and legal drafting rules which follow from the principle of legal certainty and a rule of law. The main problem appears with European Parliament and Council regulations which establish only very general rules. Also, too many delegated and implementing regulations of the Commission are causing problems, specially when they have short implementation deadlines and change quickly. The article therefore contains examples of loopholes, presents methods to deal with them and sketches paths to be taken in the future.
{"title":"Implementation of EU Regulations in Czechia","authors":"Markéta Whelanová","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad017","url":null,"abstract":"Implementation of EU regulations requires many changes in the Czech legal order. It is often necessary to repeal incompatible national provisions, provide for new penalties and provisions on competence of national institutions, or set up a new system only sketched by the EU regulations. Further, the implementation in Czechia has to match with the other parts of the Czech legal order to be effective. And it must comply with the Czech constitutional imperatives and legal drafting rules which follow from the principle of legal certainty and a rule of law. The main problem appears with European Parliament and Council regulations which establish only very general rules. Also, too many delegated and implementing regulations of the Commission are causing problems, specially when they have short implementation deadlines and change quickly. The article therefore contains examples of loopholes, presents methods to deal with them and sketches paths to be taken in the future.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139470059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article provides information regarding the assessment of bills, before the parliamentary procedure, in Greece, throughout the years. It focuses on the differences between the former ‘Central Legislative Committee’ and the current ‘Committee for Quality Evaluation of the Law Making Process’ and presents the responsibilities of the latter, as well as the improvements that have been achieved since its operation. Then an analysis of the quality of the legislation, in general, takes place and the relevant problems are highlighted.
{"title":"The Committee for Quality Evaluation of the Law Making Process in Greece: Another One Law Drafting Committee or Something More?","authors":"Spyridon Vlachopoulos","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article provides information regarding the assessment of bills, before the parliamentary procedure, in Greece, throughout the years. It focuses on the differences between the former ‘Central Legislative Committee’ and the current ‘Committee for Quality Evaluation of the Law Making Process’ and presents the responsibilities of the latter, as well as the improvements that have been achieved since its operation. Then an analysis of the quality of the legislation, in general, takes place and the relevant problems are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139440450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lay drafts as used in Nigeria are erroneously thought to speed up the drafting process but they are insufficient as drafting instruction and they reduce the quality and effectiveness of legislation. Good drafting instructions will lead to good legislation while bad drafting instructions will lead to the drafter’s failure to grasp the fundamentals of the policy, and failure to get the draft right, and ultimately failure to achieve the purpose of the policy. This article is intended to analyse the drafting process in Nigeria to point out the causes of ineffectiveness in legislation and how that can be improved.
{"title":"The Use of Lay Drafts as Drafting Instructions: A Case Study of Nigeria","authors":"Michael Habila Dauda","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad015","url":null,"abstract":"Lay drafts as used in Nigeria are erroneously thought to speed up the drafting process but they are insufficient as drafting instruction and they reduce the quality and effectiveness of legislation. Good drafting instructions will lead to good legislation while bad drafting instructions will lead to the drafter’s failure to grasp the fundamentals of the policy, and failure to get the draft right, and ultimately failure to achieve the purpose of the policy. This article is intended to analyse the drafting process in Nigeria to point out the causes of ineffectiveness in legislation and how that can be improved.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139375474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The often-overlooked provision of criminal law, which holds significant importance is section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973. Section 313 grants the accused an opportunity to provide their statement, ensuring their right to be heard and preventing self-incrimination. This article explores the background, evolution, and objectives of section 313 CrPC, as well as its alignment with the principles of natural justice. The main aim of the article is to demonstrate how India still falls short in upholding the right to silence as per section 313, through a detailed analysis of various judgments passed by the Supreme Court of India, and laws enacted in other jurisdictions around the world. The article addresses the issue of Indian courts using adverse inferences from an accused person’s silence, which conflicts with Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. It argues that drawing such inferences should be reconsidered by the courts, as it contradicts important legal principles and undermines the right to a fair trial.
{"title":"The Right to Silence Under Scrutiny: Unveiling the Significance of Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of India","authors":"Vaibhav Chadha, Deepali Poddar","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad011","url":null,"abstract":"The often-overlooked provision of criminal law, which holds significant importance is section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973. Section 313 grants the accused an opportunity to provide their statement, ensuring their right to be heard and preventing self-incrimination. This article explores the background, evolution, and objectives of section 313 CrPC, as well as its alignment with the principles of natural justice. The main aim of the article is to demonstrate how India still falls short in upholding the right to silence as per section 313, through a detailed analysis of various judgments passed by the Supreme Court of India, and laws enacted in other jurisdictions around the world. The article addresses the issue of Indian courts using adverse inferences from an accused person’s silence, which conflicts with Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. It argues that drawing such inferences should be reconsidered by the courts, as it contradicts important legal principles and undermines the right to a fair trial.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138820510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Standard essential patents have become an extremely crucial element in developing modern technologies and standardization processes. This article examines the importance of standardization and standard essential patents in developing technologies and their effect on the legal jurisprudential environment. The introduction emphasizes the role of standardization in promoting the adoption of various essential technologies. Additionally, it focuses on the significance of standard essential patents that safeguard the technologies underlying such standards. The discussion delves into a particular legal case involving Unwired Planet’s licensing campaign for standard essential patents in the communication industry, emphasizing the judgments handed down by the UK Supreme Court. The analysis further investigates critical issues involved in the decision, such as jurisdiction over global licensing, non-discrimination under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms, and the flexibility of fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory negotiations. The UK Supreme Court’s ruling clarifies maintaining a proper equilibrium between the interests of SEP holders and encouraging fair and reasonable licensing practices.
{"title":"Standard Essential Patents: Returning to the Basics on Unwired v Huawei","authors":"Soumya Prakash Patra","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad012","url":null,"abstract":"Standard essential patents have become an extremely crucial element in developing modern technologies and standardization processes. This article examines the importance of standardization and standard essential patents in developing technologies and their effect on the legal jurisprudential environment. The introduction emphasizes the role of standardization in promoting the adoption of various essential technologies. Additionally, it focuses on the significance of standard essential patents that safeguard the technologies underlying such standards. The discussion delves into a particular legal case involving Unwired Planet’s licensing campaign for standard essential patents in the communication industry, emphasizing the judgments handed down by the UK Supreme Court. The analysis further investigates critical issues involved in the decision, such as jurisdiction over global licensing, non-discrimination under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms, and the flexibility of fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory negotiations. The UK Supreme Court’s ruling clarifies maintaining a proper equilibrium between the interests of SEP holders and encouraging fair and reasonable licensing practices.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138820939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article reviews the statutory response given by Mauritius to its ‘grey-listing’ by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). It analyses the various legislations that the government had to amend or create to become compliant with the international standards set by the FATF in the wake of combating money laundering and financing of terrorism. The statutory response of Mauritius to its grey-listing by FATF can be considered as a successful one giving that a significant number of laws had to be simultaneously and harmoniously changed to the satisfaction of the FATF in a considerably short period of time. Indeed, in October 2021, Mauritius was removed from the list of jurisdictions under enhanced monitoring, having been placed there in February 2020. Therefore, the expediency which Mauritius responded through laws and the effectiveness with which it managed to restore international business through its financial services sector can humbly serve as lessons or best practices to jurisdictions finding themselves in similar situations with the FATF.
{"title":"Mauritius Responds to its ‘Grey-Listing’ by the Financial Action Task Force Through Statutes: An Informative Review","authors":"Bhavna Mahadew","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad014","url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews the statutory response given by Mauritius to its ‘grey-listing’ by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). It analyses the various legislations that the government had to amend or create to become compliant with the international standards set by the FATF in the wake of combating money laundering and financing of terrorism. The statutory response of Mauritius to its grey-listing by FATF can be considered as a successful one giving that a significant number of laws had to be simultaneously and harmoniously changed to the satisfaction of the FATF in a considerably short period of time. Indeed, in October 2021, Mauritius was removed from the list of jurisdictions under enhanced monitoring, having been placed there in February 2020. Therefore, the expediency which Mauritius responded through laws and the effectiveness with which it managed to restore international business through its financial services sector can humbly serve as lessons or best practices to jurisdictions finding themselves in similar situations with the FATF.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138820943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Articles 79(1) and (2) of the Constitution of Uganda provide that subject to the provisions of the Constitution, only Parliament or a person or body authorized by Parliament, has the power to make laws. Article 91 provides ways in which the President participates in the law-making process. I examine the Hansard of the 10th Parliament of Uganda (May 2016—May 2021) to demonstrate how the President invoked Article 91 to, inter alia, return Bills to Parliament or to decline to assent to Bills. The 10th Parliament passed 118 Bills, seven Bills were withdrawn and the President returned 11 Bills. The Hansard show that: (i) in most of the cases, Parliament amended the Bills to address the President’s concerns; (ii) there are instances in which Parliament appears to disregard the Constitution especially in cases where the President has exceeded the constitutional time limit within which he must assent to Bills; (iii) Parliament applied different methodologies to gather the information it needed to revise the Bills and (iv) in a few cases, Parliament disagreed with the President and declined to change the returned clauses of the Bills. The article shows, inter alia, that the President wielded enormous powers in the law-making process contrary to what was envisaged by the drafters of the Constitution. It is argued, inter alia, that in reconsidering the Bills returned by the President, Parliament should not ignore the issue of public participation otherwise the Acts may be declared unconstitutional. It is also argued, basing on the drafting history of the Constitution, that the 30-day period within which the President is required to assent to a Bill excludes Sundays and public holidays. However, it includes Saturdays.
{"title":"The President’s Role(s) in the Law-Making Process in Uganda","authors":"Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad013","url":null,"abstract":"Articles 79(1) and (2) of the Constitution of Uganda provide that subject to the provisions of the Constitution, only Parliament or a person or body authorized by Parliament, has the power to make laws. Article 91 provides ways in which the President participates in the law-making process. I examine the Hansard of the 10th Parliament of Uganda (May 2016—May 2021) to demonstrate how the President invoked Article 91 to, inter alia, return Bills to Parliament or to decline to assent to Bills. The 10th Parliament passed 118 Bills, seven Bills were withdrawn and the President returned 11 Bills. The Hansard show that: (i) in most of the cases, Parliament amended the Bills to address the President’s concerns; (ii) there are instances in which Parliament appears to disregard the Constitution especially in cases where the President has exceeded the constitutional time limit within which he must assent to Bills; (iii) Parliament applied different methodologies to gather the information it needed to revise the Bills and (iv) in a few cases, Parliament disagreed with the President and declined to change the returned clauses of the Bills. The article shows, inter alia, that the President wielded enormous powers in the law-making process contrary to what was envisaged by the drafters of the Constitution. It is argued, inter alia, that in reconsidering the Bills returned by the President, Parliament should not ignore the issue of public participation otherwise the Acts may be declared unconstitutional. It is also argued, basing on the drafting history of the Constitution, that the 30-day period within which the President is required to assent to a Bill excludes Sundays and public holidays. However, it includes Saturdays.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138743172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：