Juan Antonio Taguenca Belmonte, Bernabé Lugo Neria
Citizen participation is a central aspect of democracy. It is a mechanism for the empowerment of citizens that allows it to be expanded. In order to generate empirical evidence on its impact on the efficiency of public administrations, we have, with a prior conceptual, theoretical, methodological and instrumental framework, investigated its results in the Municipal Social Infrastructure Fund (FISM) received by the municipalities of Hidalgo. We sought to answer questions such as: will municipal efficiency improve if citizens are included in decisions? What kind of citizen participation —consultative, deliberative or evaluative— influences financial efficiency the most? These questions were answered through an econometric methodology that uses panel data with a Random Effects Model (REM). The result obtained showed that evaluative citizen participation favors local financial efficiency in Hidalgo
{"title":"La incidencia de la participación ciudadana en la eficiencia: El caso del Fondo de Infraestructura Social Municipal (FISM) en Hidalgo.","authors":"Juan Antonio Taguenca Belmonte, Bernabé Lugo Neria","doi":"10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.807","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.807","url":null,"abstract":"Citizen participation is a central aspect of democracy. It is a mechanism for the empowerment of citizens that allows it to be expanded. In order to generate empirical evidence on its impact on the efficiency of public administrations, we have, with a prior conceptual, theoretical, methodological and instrumental framework, investigated its results in the Municipal Social Infrastructure Fund (FISM) received by the municipalities of Hidalgo. We sought to answer questions such as: will municipal efficiency improve if citizens are included in decisions? What kind of citizen participation —consultative, deliberative or evaluative— influences financial efficiency the most? These questions were answered through an econometric methodology that uses panel data with a Random Effects Model (REM). The result obtained showed that evaluative citizen participation favors local financial efficiency in Hidalgo","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"11 1","pages":"101-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89746264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In Mexico, evidence about the relationship between poverty and inequality, on the one hand, and delinquency, on the other, has been elusive. After correcting the problem of endogeneity through instrumental variables and controlling for the socio-demographic and economic specificities of the municipalities, we find that there is a negative relationship between robbery and poverty, while a positive relationship prevails with inequality. Moreover, the interaction between the size of municipality and inequality makes the magnitude of the relationship vary with the size of the municipality. To the extent that the more prosperous municipalities are more prone to suffer robberies, ceteris paribus, it is inferred that the expected benefits of the robberies are greater than their expected costs. These results are robust to the different poverty indicators used, so they represent a solid starting point for making crime prevention decisions.
{"title":"Pobreza, desigualdad y tamaño de municipio como factores explicativos del robo en México.","authors":"Willy W. Cortez, Aurea Esther Grijalva Eternod","doi":"10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.812","url":null,"abstract":"In Mexico, evidence about the relationship between poverty and inequality, on the one hand, and delinquency, on the other, has been elusive. After correcting the problem of endogeneity through instrumental variables and controlling for the socio-demographic and economic specificities of the municipalities, we find that there is a negative relationship between robbery and poverty, while a positive relationship prevails with inequality. Moreover, the interaction between the size of municipality and inequality makes the magnitude of the relationship vary with the size of the municipality. To the extent that the more prosperous municipalities are more prone to suffer robberies, ceteris paribus, it is inferred that the expected benefits of the robberies are greater than their expected costs. These results are robust to the different poverty indicators used, so they represent a solid starting point for making crime prevention decisions.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"19 1","pages":"127-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87331897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David Arellano, C. Cadena, Samuel Zepeda, Ricardo Uvalle, Gabriel Stephan Rojas Salazar
Resena de David Arellano, Cecilia Cadena, Samuel Zepeda, Ricardo Uvalle y Gabriel Stephan Rojas Salazar para el libro " Filosofia y administracion publica: Una introduccion" de Edoardo Ongaro.
David Arellano, Cecilia Cadena, Samuel Zepeda, Ricardo Uvalle和Gabriel Stephan Rojas Salazar为Edoardo Ongaro的《Filosofia y administracion publica: Una introduccion》一书进行评论。
{"title":"Ongaro, Edoardo, Filosofía y administración pública: Una introducción, México, CIDE, 2020, 384 pp.","authors":"David Arellano, C. Cadena, Samuel Zepeda, Ricardo Uvalle, Gabriel Stephan Rojas Salazar","doi":"10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.845","url":null,"abstract":"Resena de David Arellano, Cecilia Cadena, Samuel Zepeda, Ricardo Uvalle y Gabriel Stephan Rojas Salazar para el libro \" Filosofia y administracion publica: Una introduccion\" de Edoardo Ongaro.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"11 1","pages":"235-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87448528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Resena de Antonio Villalpando Acuna para el libro El Estado en la era exponencial de Oscar Oszlak.
安东尼奥·维拉潘多·阿库纳(Antonio Villalpando Acuna)为奥斯卡·奥斯拉克(Oscar Oszlak)的《指数时代的国家》(el Estado en la era exponencial)一书撰写的评论。
{"title":"Oscar Oszlak, El Estado en la era exponencial, Buenos Aires, Instituto Nacional de la Administración Pública (INAP), 2020, 265 pp.","authors":"A. Acuña","doi":"10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.846","url":null,"abstract":"Resena de Antonio Villalpando Acuna para el libro El Estado en la era exponencial de Oscar Oszlak.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"100 1","pages":"245-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88310975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The objective of this paper is to analyze the cross-border mobility planning processes and governance at the United States (USA)-Mexico border and what can be learned based on the outcomes of two recent international mobility projects. Two projects are analyzed: One is a scheme based on a traditional inter-governmental cooperation approach of an international bridge in Tornillo, Texas and Guadalupe, Chihuahua; the other is a public private partnership (PPP) to facilitate international border crossings at the Tijuana airport. The research uses a case study methodology. The main goal is to undertake a comparison of two governance models based on social network analysis in order to understand the role that specific network characteristics play on the policy strategy to achieve the goal of producing collective goods.
{"title":"Movilidad transfronteriza, planeación y gobernanza en la frontera México-Estados Unidos: Procesos y resultados.","authors":"Sergio Peña","doi":"10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.804","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.804","url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to analyze the cross-border mobility planning processes and governance at the United States (USA)-Mexico border and what can be learned based on the outcomes of two recent international mobility projects. Two projects are analyzed: One is a scheme based on a traditional inter-governmental cooperation approach of an international bridge in Tornillo, Texas and Guadalupe, Chihuahua; the other is a public private partnership (PPP) to facilitate international border crossings at the Tijuana airport. The research uses a case study methodology. The main goal is to undertake a comparison of two governance models based on social network analysis in order to understand the role that specific network characteristics play on the policy strategy to achieve the goal of producing collective goods.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83223869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This work evaluated the Science-Policy Interface (SPI) promoted by the political instrument Agenda Local 21 in its Mexican version (called Agenda Desde lo Local) which articulated state officials (SO), municipal officials (MO), and academic experts (EX) on local management for sustainable development and were implemented in Michoacan (Mexico) between 2008 and 2013. The evaluation was conducted through a conceptual framework with four analytical categories spanning 16 factors and 39 attributes. Among the systemic factors, the objectives and processes of the interface showed strength, but the outputs had uncertain impacts. The attitudinal factors of involved actors showed high cognitive distance and very differentiated levels of reality between MO and EX. The motivation, commitment, and perception of the others were excellent in so, but the remaining actors showed weak performance. The evaluation led to lessons learned of interest in the design of political instruments that promote the links between science and policy.
这项工作评估了科学-政策接口(SPI)，该接口由政治工具《21世纪地方议程》(Agenda Local 21)在其墨西哥版本(称为Agenda Desde lo Local)中推广，该版本阐述了州官员(SO)、市政官员(MO)和学术专家(EX)对地方可持续发展管理的看法，并于2008年至2013年在米却肯州(墨西哥)实施。评估是通过一个概念框架进行的，该框架包含四个分析类别，涵盖16个因素和39个属性。在系统因素中，界面目标和过程表现出强度，但输出具有不确定的影响。参与行为者的态度因素表现出较高的认知距离和现实水平差异，动机、承诺和他人感知表现优异，其余行为者表现较差。在设计促进科学与政策之间联系的政治手段方面，评价得出了令人感兴趣的经验教训。
{"title":"Evaluación de la interfaz ciencia-política a nivel municipal en la implementación de la Agenda Local 21en Michoacán (México).","authors":"A. Burgos, G. Bocco","doi":"10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.819","url":null,"abstract":"This work evaluated the Science-Policy Interface (SPI) promoted by the political instrument Agenda Local 21 in its Mexican version (called Agenda Desde lo Local) which articulated state officials (SO), municipal officials (MO), and academic experts (EX) on local management for sustainable development and were implemented in Michoacan (Mexico) between 2008 and 2013. The evaluation was conducted through a conceptual framework with four analytical categories spanning 16 factors and 39 attributes. Among the systemic factors, the objectives and processes of the interface showed strength, but the outputs had uncertain impacts. The attitudinal factors of involved actors showed high cognitive distance and very differentiated levels of reality between MO and EX. The motivation, commitment, and perception of the others were excellent in so, but the remaining actors showed weak performance. The evaluation led to lessons learned of interest in the design of political instruments that promote the links between science and policy.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"48 1","pages":"197-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84663619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gilberto Enrique Gómez, Gloria Andrea Mayorga Martínez
The research explains the differentiated conception of the public problem between the policy makers of involuntary displacement by public works and the target population located in the sector of La Paralela de Medellin, through a disarticulated public policy network. Two methodologies were used: the causal case study and the analysis of social networks. It has been found that there is a low density in the network, which represents the infrequent or non-existent relationships between the actors that conform it (public actors, civil society organizations, academic research groups) because there are few interactions between them, influencing the differentiated conception of the public problem. To respond to the phenomenon of interest, the article was based on theoretical perspectives from the bottom up and the public policy networks that consider relevant the participation of different actors in the processes of public decision.
{"title":"Concepción diferenciada del problema público Un análisis de la política pública de desplazamiento involuntario por obra pública en el sector La Paralela del municipio de Medellín, Colombia.","authors":"Gilberto Enrique Gómez, Gloria Andrea Mayorga Martínez","doi":"10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.803","url":null,"abstract":"The research explains the differentiated conception of the public problem between the policy makers of involuntary displacement by public works and the target population located in the sector of La Paralela de Medellin, through a disarticulated public policy network. Two methodologies were used: the causal case study and the analysis of social networks. It has been found that there is a low density in the network, which represents the infrequent or non-existent relationships between the actors that conform it (public actors, civil society organizations, academic research groups) because there are few interactions between them, influencing the differentiated conception of the public problem. To respond to the phenomenon of interest, the article was based on theoretical perspectives from the bottom up and the public policy networks that consider relevant the participation of different actors in the processes of public decision.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"3 1","pages":"31-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86898291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Using the policy instrument of public-private partnerships (ppps), governments achieve their policy goals by delegating the responsibility for the delivery of public infrastructure and service provision to private consortia. ppps, as hybrid institutions, embody principal-agent challenges in the implementation of public policies given that private agents may have different goals than bureaucracies. Governments need to find ways of managing consortia so that they implement policy goals despite inherent information asymmetry and in the presence of different (conflictual) institutional logics: state versus market. Governments might not always succeed in overcoming these conflicts and their failure to achieve avowed policy goals may harm public values such as accountability, transparency, responsibility, responsiveness, and quality. In order to empirically determine to what extent governments succeed in safeguarding public values in ppps, a multiple case study involving seven dbfmo projects in Spain and the Netherlands has been employed. The analysis demonstrates that governments exercise control over the operations of the private consortia and, overall, can account for their results and are able to impose a state “logic”. However, this does not happen at the outset, and not all public values are preserved simultaneously.
{"title":"La gestión de los valores públicos en asociaciones público-privadas concesionales.","authors":"Salvador Parrado, Anne-Marie Reynaers","doi":"10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.826","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/GYPP.V30I1.826","url":null,"abstract":"Using the policy instrument of public-private partnerships (ppps), governments achieve their policy goals by delegating the responsibility for the delivery of public infrastructure and service provision to private consortia. ppps, as hybrid institutions, embody principal-agent challenges in the implementation of public policies given that private agents may have different goals than bureaucracies. Governments need to find ways of managing consortia so that they implement policy goals despite inherent information asymmetry and in the presence of different (conflictual) institutional logics: state versus market. Governments might not always succeed in overcoming these conflicts and their failure to achieve avowed policy goals may harm public values such as accountability, transparency, responsibility, responsiveness, and quality. In order to empirically determine to what extent governments succeed in safeguarding public values in ppps, a multiple case study involving seven dbfmo projects in Spain and the Netherlands has been employed. The analysis demonstrates that governments exercise control over the operations of the private consortia and, overall, can account for their results and are able to impose a state “logic”. However, this does not happen at the outset, and not all public values are preserved simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"11 1","pages":"163-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90993906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Resena de Patricia Guzman Gonzalez para el libro “Bending the Rules: Procedural Politicking in the Bureaucracy” de Rachel Augustine Potter.
雷切尔·奥古斯丁·波特的《扭曲规则:官僚机构中的程序性政治》。
{"title":"Rachel Augustine Potter, Bending the Rules: Procedural Politicking in the Bureaucracy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2019, 256 pp.","authors":"Patricia Guzmán González","doi":"10.29265/gypp.v29i2.785","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v29i2.785","url":null,"abstract":"Resena de Patricia Guzman Gonzalez para el libro “Bending the Rules: Procedural Politicking in the Bureaucracy” de Rachel Augustine Potter.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"234 1","pages":"515-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85594853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article investigates the effects of public financing policies on the expansion of social mobility and coverage, between the years 1990 to 2015, in the Chilean higher education. It is based on the combination of three different methods: the case study; documen research supported by primary and secondary sources, and the compilation and analisis of statistical information. It also analyses the need to revalue investment in the production of knowledge based on in academic research as part of the social role of universities. Finally, it shows that the current system of financing has influenced, directly and positively in the social mobility of the country, especially in the first two income quintiles. It also explains the importance of educational and research work of universities in favour of development and social progress.
{"title":"Análisis de las políticas de financiamiento mixto en educación superior y sus efectos en la movilidad social y en la investigación, el caso de Chile","authors":"C. Escobar, Marcelo Ruiz Toledo, Alexis Matheu Pérez, Paola Juica Martínez","doi":"10.29265/gypp.v29i2.779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v29i2.779","url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the effects of public financing policies on the expansion of social mobility and coverage, between the years 1990 to 2015, in the Chilean higher education. It is based on the combination of three different methods: the case study; documen research supported by primary and secondary sources, and the compilation and analisis of statistical information. It also analyses the need to revalue investment in the production of knowledge based on in academic research as part of the social role of universities. Finally, it shows that the current system of financing has influenced, directly and positively in the social mobility of the country, especially in the first two income quintiles. It also explains the importance of educational and research work of universities in favour of development and social progress.","PeriodicalId":43969,"journal":{"name":"Gestion Y Politica Publica","volume":"91 1","pages":"413-445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89882339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：