Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2174/1573398x19666230911123244
Sy Duong-Quy, Toi Nguyen-Van, Anh Nguyen-Tuan, Tram Tang-Thi-Thao, Quan Nguyen-Hoang, Huong Tran-Van, Anh Vo-Thi-Kim
Background: Sleep has an essential role in restoring brain activity and balancing physiological, immune, and metabolic factors in the body. Individuals, after being infected with COVID-19, have been reported to have quite a lot of symptoms related to sleep disorders, so we conducted this study to evaluate sleep disorders in patients with COVID-19. Methods: This study involved a cross-sectional design; 547 patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 and aged 18 years and above were included. The study used the questionnaire designed by the Vietnam Society of Sleep Medicine (VSSM). Collected data were statistically analyzed and results have been obtained using SPSS software version 22.0. Results: Nightmares have been found to be increased by 10.1%, sleep quality decreased by 51.2%, and insomnia increased by 19%, compared to pre-infection. There were 24% of participants with daytime sleepiness syndrome, 23% with symptoms of memory impairment, 17% with unexplained anxiety and frustration, and 10% with loud snoring. In addition, the manifestations of sleep disorders also became more and more severe than before the infection. 68.4% of subjects were not satisfied with their current sleeping, 29.1% had sleep difficulties, including maintaining sleep, and 19.4% had trouble falling asleep. Conclusion: Sleep disturbance is a critical and common medical condition in COVID-19 patients. It is necessary to have appropriate treatment measures for insomnia in COVID-19 patients to help improve their health status and avoid post-COVID-19 sequelae.
{"title":"The Impact of Acute COVID-19 Infection on Sleep Disorders: A Real-life Descriptive Study During the Outbreak of COVID-19 Pandemic in Vietnam","authors":"Sy Duong-Quy, Toi Nguyen-Van, Anh Nguyen-Tuan, Tram Tang-Thi-Thao, Quan Nguyen-Hoang, Huong Tran-Van, Anh Vo-Thi-Kim","doi":"10.2174/1573398x19666230911123244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x19666230911123244","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Sleep has an essential role in restoring brain activity and balancing physiological, immune, and metabolic factors in the body. Individuals, after being infected with COVID-19, have been reported to have quite a lot of symptoms related to sleep disorders, so we conducted this study to evaluate sleep disorders in patients with COVID-19. Methods: This study involved a cross-sectional design; 547 patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 and aged 18 years and above were included. The study used the questionnaire designed by the Vietnam Society of Sleep Medicine (VSSM). Collected data were statistically analyzed and results have been obtained using SPSS software version 22.0. Results: Nightmares have been found to be increased by 10.1%, sleep quality decreased by 51.2%, and insomnia increased by 19%, compared to pre-infection. There were 24% of participants with daytime sleepiness syndrome, 23% with symptoms of memory impairment, 17% with unexplained anxiety and frustration, and 10% with loud snoring. In addition, the manifestations of sleep disorders also became more and more severe than before the infection. 68.4% of subjects were not satisfied with their current sleeping, 29.1% had sleep difficulties, including maintaining sleep, and 19.4% had trouble falling asleep. Conclusion: Sleep disturbance is a critical and common medical condition in COVID-19 patients. It is necessary to have appropriate treatment measures for insomnia in COVID-19 patients to help improve their health status and avoid post-COVID-19 sequelae.","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":"115 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134957266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2174/1573398x19666230915103234
Monica Tosto, Andrea Giugno, Laura Sciuto, Giuseppe Fabio Parisi, Maria Papale, Alberto Terminella, Giacomo Cusumano, Sara Manti, Salvatore Leonardi
Background: Foreign body aspiration is common among older infants and toddlers and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. It may escape notice by the physicians due to lack of knowledge of the exact history, high variability of clinical presentation, variable latency of the onset of symptoms, and inconclusive radiographical findings. Case report: We present a case series about children diagnosed with foreign body aspiration referred to the Pediatric Respiratory Unit of San Marco Hospital in Catania between January 2018 and November 2022. Data regarding demographic characteristics, symptoms, and type of foreign body were collected and analyzed. Conclusion: Early diagnosis is the key to therapeutic success and effective management of foreign body aspiration. We will review the literature to highlight the diagnostic difficulties related to this condition and the useful tools to recognize and manage it. The most essential part of foreign body aspiration treatment is prevention and the need to educate parents and primary care physicians. It is, therefore, of the utmost importance to consider airway foreign bodies as a cause of cough unresponsive to therapy, recurrent wheezing, and relapsing pneumonia.
{"title":"Foreign Body Aspiration in Children: Retrospective Case Series and Literature Update","authors":"Monica Tosto, Andrea Giugno, Laura Sciuto, Giuseppe Fabio Parisi, Maria Papale, Alberto Terminella, Giacomo Cusumano, Sara Manti, Salvatore Leonardi","doi":"10.2174/1573398x19666230915103234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x19666230915103234","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Foreign body aspiration is common among older infants and toddlers and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. It may escape notice by the physicians due to lack of knowledge of the exact history, high variability of clinical presentation, variable latency of the onset of symptoms, and inconclusive radiographical findings. Case report: We present a case series about children diagnosed with foreign body aspiration referred to the Pediatric Respiratory Unit of San Marco Hospital in Catania between January 2018 and November 2022. Data regarding demographic characteristics, symptoms, and type of foreign body were collected and analyzed. Conclusion: Early diagnosis is the key to therapeutic success and effective management of foreign body aspiration. We will review the literature to highlight the diagnostic difficulties related to this condition and the useful tools to recognize and manage it. The most essential part of foreign body aspiration treatment is prevention and the need to educate parents and primary care physicians. It is, therefore, of the utmost importance to consider airway foreign bodies as a cause of cough unresponsive to therapy, recurrent wheezing, and relapsing pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":"34 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134996493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2174/1573398x1904231027165004
Joseph Varon
{"title":"The Impact of War on Pulmonary and Critical Care Healthcare Practitioners","authors":"Joseph Varon","doi":"10.2174/1573398x1904231027165004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x1904231027165004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":"97 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135222158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2174/1573398x19666230911094423
Reza Sinaei, Maedeh Jafari, Rezvan Karamozian, Sara Pezeshki, Roya Sinaei, Fatemeh Karami Robati, Mehrnoush Hassas Yeganeh, Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh
Background: Vaccines during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic entered the market faster than a routine proportionate evaluation cycle. The highest number of deaths and morbidities, especially by the type of B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant, is one of the reasons for this inevitability. Accordingly, evaluation of the effects of vaccines is of great importance Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the effects of four current COVID-19 vaccines, such as AstraZeneca, Sputnik, Sinopharm, and Bharat, and the prevalence of COVID-19 occurrence among 600 vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) in the Southeast of Iran. Results: The incidence of infection among vaccinated HCWs was 36.3%, without any age and gender difference, statistically. The infection rate with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus- 2 (SARS-CoV-2) following immunization with AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, Bharat, and Sinopharm vaccines were 45.8%, 41.3%, 36.9%, and 18.6%, respectively (P.V=0.001). Those who had a history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were more affected again despite vaccination (P.V=0.001). However, out of 218 infected patients, only six patients (2.8%) were hospitalized, while 26 patients (11.9%) received remdesivir and two patients (0.9%) needed to additional target therapy with Iinterleukin-6 inhibitor of Tocilizumab due to cytokine storm. Conclusion: During B.1.617.2 circulating variant, all vaccines after a complete vaccination schedule were relatively associated with protection against severe infection and hospitalization. We found that people who received the Sinopharm vaccine had the lowest incidence of COVID-19 (18.7%), followed by Bharat. The lowest incidence of protection occurred with viral vector-based vaccines, especially AstraZeneca.
{"title":"Short-term SARS-CoV-2 re-infection rate in vaccinated health workers based on received vaccines: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Reza Sinaei, Maedeh Jafari, Rezvan Karamozian, Sara Pezeshki, Roya Sinaei, Fatemeh Karami Robati, Mehrnoush Hassas Yeganeh, Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh","doi":"10.2174/1573398x19666230911094423","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x19666230911094423","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vaccines during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic entered the market faster than a routine proportionate evaluation cycle. The highest number of deaths and morbidities, especially by the type of B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant, is one of the reasons for this inevitability. Accordingly, evaluation of the effects of vaccines is of great importance Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the effects of four current COVID-19 vaccines, such as AstraZeneca, Sputnik, Sinopharm, and Bharat, and the prevalence of COVID-19 occurrence among 600 vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) in the Southeast of Iran. Results: The incidence of infection among vaccinated HCWs was 36.3%, without any age and gender difference, statistically. The infection rate with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus- 2 (SARS-CoV-2) following immunization with AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, Bharat, and Sinopharm vaccines were 45.8%, 41.3%, 36.9%, and 18.6%, respectively (P.V=0.001). Those who had a history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were more affected again despite vaccination (P.V=0.001). However, out of 218 infected patients, only six patients (2.8%) were hospitalized, while 26 patients (11.9%) received remdesivir and two patients (0.9%) needed to additional target therapy with Iinterleukin-6 inhibitor of Tocilizumab due to cytokine storm. Conclusion: During B.1.617.2 circulating variant, all vaccines after a complete vaccination schedule were relatively associated with protection against severe infection and hospitalization. We found that people who received the Sinopharm vaccine had the lowest incidence of COVID-19 (18.7%), followed by Bharat. The lowest incidence of protection occurred with viral vector-based vaccines, especially AstraZeneca.","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134957261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}