首页 > 最新文献

Insights-The UKSG Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Increasing visibility and discoverability of scholarly publications with academic search engine optimization 通过学术搜索引擎优化提高学术出版物的可见性和可发现性
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-03-17 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.534
Lisa Schilhan, Christian Kaier, Karin Lackner
With the help of academic search engine optimization (ASEO), publications can more easily be found in academic search engines and databases. Authors can improve the ranking of their publications by adjusting titles, keywords and abstracts. Carefully considered wording makes publications easier to find and, ideally, cited more often. This article is meant to support authors in making their scholarly publications more visible. It provides basic information on ranking mechanisms as well as tips and tricks on how to improve the findability of scholarly publications while also pointing out the limits of optimization. This article, authored by three scholarly communications librarians, draws on their experience of hosting journals, providing workshops for researchers and individual publication support, as well as on their investigations of the ranking algorithms of search engines and databases.
借助学术搜索引擎优化(ASEO),可以更容易地在学术搜索引擎和数据库中找到出版物。作者可以通过调整标题、关键词和摘要来提高其出版物的排名。仔细考虑的措辞使出版物更容易被找到,理想情况下,被引用的次数也会更多。这篇文章旨在支持作者使他们的学术出版物更引人注目。它提供了关于排名机制的基本信息,以及如何提高学术出版物的可查找性的提示和技巧,同时也指出了优化的局限性。本文由三位学术交流图书馆员撰写,借鉴了他们主持期刊、为研究人员提供研讨会和个人出版物支持的经验,以及他们对搜索引擎和数据库排名算法的研究。
{"title":"Increasing visibility and discoverability of scholarly publications with academic search engine optimization","authors":"Lisa Schilhan, Christian Kaier, Karin Lackner","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.534","url":null,"abstract":"With the help of academic search engine optimization (ASEO), publications can more easily be found in academic search engines and databases. Authors can improve the ranking of their publications by adjusting titles, keywords and abstracts. Carefully considered wording makes publications easier to find and, ideally, cited more often. This article is meant to support authors in making their scholarly publications more visible. It provides basic information on ranking mechanisms as well as tips and tricks on how to improve the findability of scholarly publications while also pointing out the limits of optimization. This article, authored by three scholarly communications librarians, draws on their experience of hosting journals, providing workshops for researchers and individual publication support, as well as on their investigations of the ranking algorithms of search engines and databases.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73430444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Transforming library collections in a pandemic: the perspective from Edge Hill University 大流行时期图书馆馆藏的转变:边山大学的视角
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-03-03 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.536
Anna França
The 2020 Covid-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on Higher Education (HE) libraries, requiring them to rapidly overhaul their services and accelerating the shift to digital in a short space of time. One of the most significant challenges has been how to provide students and other library users with continued access to resources previously only available in print, when libraries have been closed or are operating with restrictions in place that limit access to the physical library space. This has led many libraries to increase investment in digital content to better support students in the current climate. This article shares the perspective from Edge Hill University in the UK and focuses on work undertaken by the library to implement university-wide e-textbook access for the first time. The article explores some of the barriers the library has faced sourcing textbooks and concludes by reflecting on how 2020 may shape the library’s purchasing strategies in a post-pandemic information landscape.
2020年2019冠状病毒病大流行对高等教育图书馆产生了前所未有的影响,要求它们迅速改革服务,并在短时间内加速向数字化转型。最重要的挑战之一是,当图书馆关闭或在限制进入实体图书馆空间的限制下运作时,如何为学生和其他图书馆用户提供持续访问以前只能在印刷品上获得的资源。这使得许多图书馆增加了对数字内容的投资,以便在当前环境下更好地支持学生。本文分享了英国边山大学的观点,并重点介绍了该图书馆首次在全校范围内实施电子教科书访问的工作。本文探讨了图书馆在采购教科书方面面临的一些障碍,最后反思了在疫情后的信息环境中,2020年可能如何影响图书馆的采购策略。
{"title":"Transforming library collections in a pandemic: the perspective from Edge Hill University","authors":"Anna França","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.536","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.536","url":null,"abstract":"The 2020 Covid-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on Higher Education (HE) libraries, requiring them to rapidly overhaul their services and accelerating the shift to digital in a short space of time. One of the most significant challenges has been how to provide students and other library users with continued access to resources previously only available in print, when libraries have been closed or are operating with restrictions in place that limit access to the physical library space. This has led many libraries to increase investment in digital content to better support students in the current climate. This article shares the perspective from Edge Hill University in the UK and focuses on work undertaken by the library to implement university-wide e-textbook access for the first time. The article explores some of the barriers the library has faced sourcing textbooks and concludes by reflecting on how 2020 may shape the library’s purchasing strategies in a post-pandemic information landscape.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46102827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Implementing the Global University Publications Licence: a new open scholarship model for advocating change 实施全球大学出版物许可:倡导变革的新开放奖学金模式
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-02-17 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.531
Jiafeng Zhou, Kelly Wu, N. Smyth
Universities want a voluntary, non-exclusive licence from authors to disseminate publications. This practitioner case study explores an innovative model to communicate and advance open and equitable scholarship through the implementation of the Global University Publications Licence at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China. This article explains the licensing policy and key influences, including, the copyright law of the People’s Republic of China and the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). The University approved the Global University Publications Licence, with implementation from 1 August 2019. It is available in Chinese and English. Since implementation, the University has retained rights for 74% of research publications submitted. 100% of those publications are available through the University with a CC-BY licence and zero embargo. The open scholarship model provides an equitable approach to versions and citation. The article concludes by suggesting university libraries can exploit copyright law in China to progress open scholarship strategies, including recognition of employers as authors of works, a priority right to the exploitation of works and an embargo protection of two years after the completion of the work. The author’s final version of publications can be open, discoverable, cited and preserved through trusted universities with global reputations for high-quality research.
大学希望获得作者自愿的、非排他性的许可来传播出版物。本实践者案例研究探讨了一种创新模式,通过在中国宁波诺丁汉大学实施全球大学出版物许可来交流和促进开放和公平的奖学金。本文解释了许可政策和关键影响,包括中华人民共和国版权法和《研究评估宣言》(DORA)。该大学批准了全球大学出版物许可证,自2019年8月1日起实施。有中文和英文两种版本。自实施以来,大学保留了74%提交的研究出版物的权利。所有这些出版物都可以通过大学获得CC-BY许可和零禁运。开放奖学金模式为版本和引用提供了公平的方法。文章最后建议,大学图书馆可以利用中国的版权法来推进开放奖学金战略,包括承认雇主是作品的作者,优先使用作品的权利,以及作品完成后两年的禁运保护。作者的出版物的最终版本可以通过具有全球高质量研究声誉的值得信赖的大学开放、可发现、引用和保存。
{"title":"Implementing the Global University Publications Licence: a new open scholarship model for advocating change","authors":"Jiafeng Zhou, Kelly Wu, N. Smyth","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.531","url":null,"abstract":"Universities want a voluntary, non-exclusive licence from authors to disseminate publications. This practitioner case study explores an innovative model to communicate and advance open and equitable scholarship through the implementation of the Global University Publications Licence at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China. This article explains the licensing policy and key influences, including, the copyright law of the People’s Republic of China and the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). The University approved the Global University Publications Licence, with implementation from 1 August 2019. It is available in Chinese and English. Since implementation, the University has retained rights for 74% of research publications submitted. 100% of those publications are available through the University with a CC-BY licence and zero embargo. The open scholarship model provides an equitable approach to versions and citation. The article concludes by suggesting university libraries can exploit copyright law in China to progress open scholarship strategies, including recognition of employers as authors of works, a priority right to the exploitation of works and an embargo protection of two years after the completion of the work. The author’s final version of publications can be open, discoverable, cited and preserved through trusted universities with global reputations for high-quality research.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44113179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Every nook and cranny: making the library central to research and engagement 每个角落和缝隙:使图书馆成为研究和参与的中心
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-02-03 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.528
Katherine Stephan
This article discusses the institutional spaces, both large and small, where academic libraries may become embedded in research-related activities throughout the university. It then goes on to consider some of the possible changes and outcomes as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. It outlines current research on opportunities for change in libraries, researcher demands, collaboration and the need for more research about working together. It concludes by suggesting that libraries and individuals should embrace principles of ‘planned happenstance’ so as to expand what may be possible with our new working spaces and realities.
本文讨论了大型和小型的机构空间,在这些机构空间中,学术图书馆可能会融入整个大学的研究相关活动。然后,它接着考虑了新冠肺炎大流行可能带来的一些变化和结果。它概述了目前关于图书馆变革的机会、研究人员的需求、合作以及更多关于共同工作的研究需求的研究。它的结论是建议图书馆和个人应该接受“计划偶然性”的原则,以便扩大我们新的工作空间和现实的可能性。
{"title":"Every nook and cranny: making the library central to research and engagement","authors":"Katherine Stephan","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.528","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the institutional spaces, both large and small, where academic libraries may become embedded in research-related activities throughout the university. It then goes on to consider some of the possible changes and outcomes as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. It outlines current research on opportunities for change in libraries, researcher demands, collaboration and the need for more research about working together. It concludes by suggesting that libraries and individuals should embrace principles of ‘planned happenstance’ so as to expand what may be possible with our new working spaces and realities.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75237288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dissemination of Applied Research to the Field: Attitudes and Practices of Faculty Authors in Social Work 应用研究向领域的传播:社会工作教员作者的态度与实践
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.546
Kimberly Pendell, Ericka Kimball
In applied research disciplines like social work, the disconnect between the production and dissemination of research and the access and use of research in practice becomes very clear. This research/practice divide is particularly problematic for practitioners required to work within evidence-based or research-informed frameworks. To explore this issue, we conducted a nationwide survey and qualitative interviews with social work faculty regarding their research dissemination attitudes and practices, especially to non-academic audiences. The survey and interviews provide data on faculty dissemination methods; gold and green open access; and promotion and tenure considerations. Results demonstrate that faculty are primarily engaged with traditional dissemination methods, and much less engaged with dissemination to non-academic audiences. Faculty are skeptical of open access journals, avoid article processing charges, and are only minimally engaged with institutional repositories. Faculty are conflicted regarding the dissemination of applied research, especially in the context of promotion and tenure. Shifting dissemination to the field would require increased confidence in open access, support for the creation of practitioner focused materials, and reprioritizing impact of research in the field.
在像社会工作这样的应用研究学科中,研究的产生和传播与研究在实践中的获取和使用之间的脱节变得非常明显。对于需要在循证或研究知情框架内工作的从业者来说,这种研究/实践鸿沟尤其成问题。为了探讨这个问题,我们在全国范围内对社会工作教师进行了调查和定性访谈,了解他们的研究传播态度和实践,特别是对非学术受众。调查和访谈提供了有关教师传播方法的数据;金绿开放接入;还有晋升和终身职位的考虑。结果表明,教师主要从事传统的传播方法,而很少从事非学术受众的传播。教师们对开放获取期刊持怀疑态度,避免收取文章处理费,并且只与机构知识库进行最低限度的接触。教师们在应用研究的传播方面存在矛盾,特别是在晋升和终身教职的背景下。将传播转移到该领域将需要增加对开放获取的信心,支持创建以从业者为重点的材料,并重新确定该领域研究的影响的优先级。
{"title":"Dissemination of Applied Research to the Field: Attitudes and Practices of Faculty Authors in Social Work","authors":"Kimberly Pendell, Ericka Kimball","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.546","url":null,"abstract":"In applied research disciplines like social work, the disconnect between the production and dissemination of research and the access and use of research in practice becomes very clear. This research/practice divide is particularly problematic for practitioners required to work within evidence-based or research-informed frameworks. To explore this issue, we conducted a nationwide survey and qualitative interviews with social work faculty regarding their research dissemination attitudes and practices, especially to non-academic audiences. The survey and interviews provide data on faculty dissemination methods; gold and green open access; and promotion and tenure considerations. Results demonstrate that faculty are primarily engaged with traditional dissemination methods, and much less engaged with dissemination to non-academic audiences. Faculty are skeptical of open access journals, avoid article processing charges, and are only minimally engaged with institutional repositories. Faculty are conflicted regarding the dissemination of applied research, especially in the context of promotion and tenure. Shifting dissemination to the field would require increased confidence in open access, support for the creation of practitioner focused materials, and reprioritizing impact of research in the field.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74910724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Collaboration across campus: open monograph insights from a library and ‘old’ university press partnership 跨校园合作:来自图书馆和“老”大学出版社合作伙伴关系的开放专著见解
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-01-20 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.533
S. Barake, A. Welsby
Liverpool University Press and the University of Liverpool Library collaborated to publish two open access monographs to gain insights into each other’s processes and requirements, and improve the guidance provided to researchers and authors. Lessons learned include researchers’ knowledge of publishing and open access, the monograph publishing process and costs involved, licences and third-party content and the marketing and discoverability of open monographs. Researchers, particularly those at the start of their career, may not have much knowledge and experience of publishing and so it is important for publishers to be as transparent as possible about the processes involved, and for libraries to ensure they are providing sufficient guidance. Knowledge about publishers’ processes and costs allows libraries to have a better understanding about what is reasonable to expect and for researchers to better plan costs for funding applications. Transparency from publishers about the types of costs involved, as well as a greater understanding of the financial requirements of libraries and their institutions, will allow publishers to plan their marketing of open monographs more effectively. The project demonstrated that collaboration between libraries and publishers can be extremely valuable and beneficial to both.
利物浦大学出版社和利物浦大学图书馆合作出版了两本开放获取专著,以深入了解彼此的流程和要求,并改进为研究人员和作者提供的指导。经验教训包括研究人员对出版和开放获取的知识、专著出版过程和所涉及的成本、许可证和第三方内容以及开放专著的营销和可发现性。研究人员,特别是那些刚开始职业生涯的研究人员,可能没有太多出版知识和经验,因此出版商对所涉及的过程尽可能透明,图书馆确保提供足够的指导,这一点很重要。通过了解出版商的流程和成本,图书馆可以更好地了解合理的预期,研究人员也可以更好地规划资助申请的成本。出版商对所涉及成本类型的透明度,以及对图书馆及其机构的财务要求的更深入了解,将使出版商能够更有效地规划公开专著的营销。该项目表明,图书馆和出版商之间的合作对双方都非常有价值和有益。
{"title":"Collaboration across campus: open monograph insights from a library and ‘old’ university press partnership","authors":"S. Barake, A. Welsby","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.533","url":null,"abstract":"Liverpool University Press and the University of Liverpool Library collaborated to publish two open access monographs to gain insights into each other’s processes and requirements, and improve the guidance provided to researchers and authors. Lessons learned include researchers’ knowledge of publishing and open access, the monograph publishing process and costs involved, licences and third-party content and the marketing and discoverability of open monographs. Researchers, particularly those at the start of their career, may not have much knowledge and experience of publishing and so it is important for publishers to be as transparent as possible about the processes involved, and for libraries to ensure they are providing sufficient guidance. Knowledge about publishers’ processes and costs allows libraries to have a better understanding about what is reasonable to expect and for researchers to better plan costs for funding applications. Transparency from publishers about the types of costs involved, as well as a greater understanding of the financial requirements of libraries and their institutions, will allow publishers to plan their marketing of open monographs more effectively. The project demonstrated that collaboration between libraries and publishers can be extremely valuable and beneficial to both.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48260343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Discovery is the researcher’s dream 发现是研究者的梦想
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.571
Magaly Bascones, Rebekah Cummings
Discovery is the researcher’s dream. The dream of a straightforward search that allows information seekers to find the content they are looking for and, more importantly, relevant content they do not yet know about. Librarians, system vendors and content providers aim to materialize this dream of efficient and accurate discovery motivated by rationales that vary from the noble goals of knowledge creation and sharing to profit-driven commercial grounds.
发现是研究者的梦想。一个直接搜索的梦想,允许信息搜索者找到他们正在寻找的内容,更重要的是,找到他们还不知道的相关内容。图书馆员、系统供应商和内容提供商的目标是实现这种高效和准确发现的梦想,其动机从知识创造和共享的崇高目标到利润驱动的商业理由各不相同。
{"title":"Discovery is the researcher’s dream","authors":"Magaly Bascones, Rebekah Cummings","doi":"10.1629/uksg.571","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.571","url":null,"abstract":"Discovery is the researcher’s dream. The dream of a straightforward search that allows information seekers to find the content they are looking for and, more importantly, relevant content they do not yet know about. Librarians, system vendors and content providers aim to materialize this dream of efficient and accurate discovery motivated by rationales that vary from the noble goals of knowledge creation and sharing to profit-driven commercial grounds.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77036946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution S计划的权利保留策略是一个行政和法律负担,而不是一个可持续的开放获取解决方案
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.556
S. Khoo
to inform publishers that the author accepted manuscript (AAM) will be made available under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. The laudable stated aim of the RRS is to achieve immediate open access to research outputs, while preserving journal choice for authors. However, proponents of the RRS overlook the significant administrative and legal burdens that the RRS places on authors and readers. Even though compliance with existing green open access (self-archiving) policies is poor at best, the RRS is likely to rely on authors to successfully execute the CC licensing of their work in the face of publisher resistance. The complexity of copyright law and CC licensing gives many reasons to doubt the legal validity of an RRS licence grant, which creates legal risk for authors and their institutions. The complexity of RRS CC BY licensing also creates legal risk for readers, who may not be able to fully rely on the reuse rights of a CC BY licence on the AAM. However, cOAlition S has released no legal advice that explains why the RRS is valid and legally binding. Publishers of legacy subscription journals have already begun implementing strategies that ensure they can protect their revenue streams. These actions may leave authors having to choose between paying publication fees and complying with their funding agreements. The result is that the RRS increases the complexity of the copyright and licensing landscape in academic publishing, creates legal risk and may not avoid author fees. Unless increased complexity and conflict between authors and publishers drives open access, the RRS is not fit for its stated purpose as an open access strategy. The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution
通知出版商,作者接受的手稿(AAM)将在知识共享署名(CC BY)许可下提供。RRS值得称赞的目标是实现对研究成果的即时开放获取,同时为作者保留期刊选择。然而,RRS的支持者忽视了RRS给作者和读者带来的重大行政和法律负担。尽管对现有的绿色开放获取(自存档)政策的遵从性很差,但RRS很可能依赖于作者在面对出版商的阻力时成功地执行其作品的CC许可。版权法和CC许可的复杂性使人们有很多理由怀疑RRS许可授予的法律有效性,这给作者及其机构带来了法律风险。RRS CC BY许可的复杂性也给读者带来了法律风险,他们可能无法完全依赖AAM上CC BY许可的重用权。然而,cOAlition S没有发布任何法律建议来解释为什么RRS是有效的和具有法律约束力的。传统订阅期刊的出版商已经开始实施策略,以确保他们能够保护自己的收入来源。这些行为可能会让作者不得不在支付出版费用和遵守资助协议之间做出选择。结果是,RRS增加了学术出版中版权和许可领域的复杂性,产生了法律风险,而且可能无法避免作者付费。除非增加复杂性和作者与出版商之间的冲突推动开放获取,否则RRS不适合其作为开放获取策略的既定目的。S计划的权利保留策略是一个行政和法律负担,而不是一个可持续的开放获取解决方案
{"title":"The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution","authors":"S. Khoo","doi":"10.1629/uksg.556","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.556","url":null,"abstract":"to inform publishers that the author accepted manuscript (AAM) will be made available under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. The laudable stated aim of the RRS is to achieve immediate open access to research outputs, while preserving journal choice for authors. However, proponents of the RRS overlook the significant administrative and legal burdens that the RRS places on authors and readers. Even though compliance with existing green open access (self-archiving) policies is poor at best, the RRS is likely to rely on authors to successfully execute the CC licensing of their work in the face of publisher resistance. The complexity of copyright law and CC licensing gives many reasons to doubt the legal validity of an RRS licence grant, which creates legal risk for authors and their institutions. The complexity of RRS CC BY licensing also creates legal risk for readers, who may not be able to fully rely on the reuse rights of a CC BY licence on the AAM. However, cOAlition S has released no legal advice that explains why the RRS is valid and legally binding. Publishers of legacy subscription journals have already begun implementing strategies that ensure they can protect their revenue streams. These actions may leave authors having to choose between paying publication fees and complying with their funding agreements. The result is that the RRS increases the complexity of the copyright and licensing landscape in academic publishing, creates legal risk and may not avoid author fees. Unless increased complexity and conflict between authors and publishers drives open access, the RRS is not fit for its stated purpose as an open access strategy. The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81877155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Longevity of print book use at a small public university: a 30-year longitudinal study 小型公立大学纸质书使用寿命:一项30年的纵向研究
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.562
Melissa Belvadi
{"title":"Longevity of print book use at a small public university: a 30-year longitudinal study","authors":"Melissa Belvadi","doi":"10.1629/uksg.562","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.562","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83254461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Electronic resource management in a post-Plan S world 后S计划时代的电子资源管理
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.554
Jill Emery, G. Stone
{"title":"Electronic resource management in a post-Plan S world","authors":"Jill Emery, G. Stone","doi":"10.1629/uksg.554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.554","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"405 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89228746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Insights-The UKSG Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1