首页 > 最新文献

Insights-The UKSG Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Austrian Transition to Open Access: a collaborative approach 奥地利向开放获取的过渡:一种协作的方法
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.561
Rita Pinhasi, Lothar Hölbling, Brigitte Kromp
{"title":"Austrian Transition to Open Access: a collaborative approach","authors":"Rita Pinhasi, Lothar Hölbling, Brigitte Kromp","doi":"10.1629/uksg.561","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.561","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83243612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of open access publishing agreements at the University of Vienna in light of the Plan S requirements: a review of current status, challenges and perspectives 根据S计划的要求,维也纳大学开放获取出版协议的影响:对现状、挑战和前景的回顾
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.523
Rita Pinhasi, Brigitte Kromp, Guido Blechl, Lothar Hölbling
The University of Vienna, in partnership with other organisations across Austria, has been at the forefront of the open access (OA) movement in Europe and has been actively broadening the OA publishing opportunities for its researchers for well over half a decade. Although the launch of Plan S in September 2018 by a group of funding bodies that includes the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) brought its unique challenges, it has also provided the international research community with a much-needed impetus, jolting publishers into action and raising awareness among university administrators and faculty in general. The announcement also prompted the Vienna University Library to perform a mapping exercise, with a view to assessing how well the current publishing agreements match the needs of the University’s researchers in light of the Plan S requirements. This article presents the results of this analysis and shares some of the challenges encountered through the negotiation and implementation of OA publishing agreements and how these, together with the revised Plan S implementation guidelines, have been informing the University’s strategy.
维也纳大学与奥地利各地的其他组织合作,一直走在欧洲开放获取(OA)运动的前沿,并且在过去的五年里一直积极地为其研究人员扩大OA出版机会。尽管包括奥地利科学基金(FWF)在内的一组资助机构于2018年9月启动了S计划,带来了独特的挑战,但它也为国际研究界提供了急需的动力,促使出版商采取行动,并提高了大学管理人员和教师的认识。这一宣布还促使维也纳大学图书馆开展了一项测绘工作,目的是根据S计划的要求,评估目前的出版协议在多大程度上满足了维也纳大学研究人员的需求。本文介绍了这一分析的结果,并分享了在OA出版协议的谈判和实施过程中遇到的一些挑战,以及这些挑战如何与修订的S计划实施指南一起为大学的战略提供信息。
{"title":"The impact of open access publishing agreements at the University of Vienna in light of the Plan S requirements: a review of current status, challenges and perspectives","authors":"Rita Pinhasi, Brigitte Kromp, Guido Blechl, Lothar Hölbling","doi":"10.1629/uksg.523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.523","url":null,"abstract":"The University of Vienna, in partnership with other organisations across Austria, has been at the forefront of the open access (OA) movement in Europe and has been actively broadening the OA publishing opportunities for its researchers for well over half a decade. Although the launch of Plan S in September 2018 by a group of funding bodies that includes the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) brought its unique challenges, it has also provided the international research community with a much-needed impetus, jolting publishers into action and raising awareness among university administrators and faculty in general. The announcement also prompted the Vienna University Library to perform a mapping exercise, with a view to assessing how well the current publishing agreements match the needs of the University’s researchers in light of the Plan S requirements. This article presents the results of this analysis and shares some of the challenges encountered through the negotiation and implementation of OA publishing agreements and how these, together with the revised Plan S implementation guidelines, have been informing the University’s strategy.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44364735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Open access publishing in chemistry: a practical perspective informing new education 开放存取出版在化学:一个实用的角度通知新的教育
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI: 10.22541/au.160564394.45377856/v1
M. Pagliaro
In the late 1990s chemists were among the early adopters of open access(OA) publishing. As it happened with preprints, the early successfuladoption of OA publishing from chemists subsequently slowed down. In2016 chemistry was found to be the discipline with the lowest fractionof OA papers amid papers in all fields published between 2009 and 2015.To benefit from open science in terms of enhanced citations,collaboration, job and funding opportunities, chemistry scholars needupdated information (and education) on open science of practicalrelevance. Suggesting avenues for quick uptake of OA publishing fromchemists in both developed and developing countries, this study offers acritical perspective on academic publishing in the chemical sciencesthat will be useful to inform the aforementioned education.
在20世纪90年代末,化学家是开放获取(OA)出版的早期采用者之一。就像预印本一样,化学家早期成功采用OA出版的速度随后放缓了。2016年发现,在2009年至2015年发表的所有领域的论文中,化学是OA论文比例最低的学科。为了从开放科学中获得更多的引用、合作、工作和资助机会,化学学者需要有关开放科学实践相关的最新信息(和教育)。这项研究为发达国家和发展中国家的化学家提供了快速接受开放获取出版的途径,为化学科学的学术出版提供了重要的视角,这将有助于为上述教育提供信息。
{"title":"Open access publishing in chemistry: a practical perspective informing new education","authors":"M. Pagliaro","doi":"10.22541/au.160564394.45377856/v1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160564394.45377856/v1","url":null,"abstract":"In the late 1990s chemists were among the early adopters of open access\u0000(OA) publishing. As it happened with preprints, the early successful\u0000adoption of OA publishing from chemists subsequently slowed down. In\u00002016 chemistry was found to be the discipline with the lowest fraction\u0000of OA papers amid papers in all fields published between 2009 and 2015.\u0000To benefit from open science in terms of enhanced citations,\u0000collaboration, job and funding opportunities, chemistry scholars need\u0000updated information (and education) on open science of practical\u0000relevance. Suggesting avenues for quick uptake of OA publishing from\u0000chemists in both developed and developing countries, this study offers a\u0000critical perspective on academic publishing in the chemical sciences\u0000that will be useful to inform the aforementioned education.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"341 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76396669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Swedish researchers’ responses to the cancellation of the big deal with Elsevier 瑞典研究人员对取消与爱思唯尔的大交易的回应
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-11-11 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.521
Lisa Olsson, C. Lindelöw, Lovisa Österlund, Frida Jakobsson
In 2018, the Swedish library consortium, Bibsam, decided to cancel big deal subscriptions with Elsevier. Many researchers (n = 4,221) let their voices be heard in a survey on the consequences of the cancellation. Almost a third of them (n = 1,241) chose to leave free-text responses to the survey question ‘Is there anything you would like to add?’. A content analysis on these responses resulted in six themes and from these, three main conclusions are drawn. First, there is no consensus among researchers on whether the cancellation was for good or evil. The most common argument in favour of the cancellation was the principle. The most common argument against cancellation was that it harms researchers and research. A third of the free-text responses expressed ambivalence towards the cancellation, typically as a conflict between wanting to change the current publishing system and simultaneously suffering from the consequences of the cancellation. The general support for open access in principle reveals a flawed publishing system, as most feel the pressure to publish in prestigious journals behind paywalls in practice. Second, it was difficult for researchers to take a position for or against cancellation due to their limited knowledge of the ongoing work of higher education institutions and library consortia. Finally, there are indications that the cancellation made researchers reflect on open access and to some extent alter their publication pattern through their choice of copyright licence and publication channel.
2018年,瑞典图书馆联盟Bibsam决定取消与爱思唯尔的大额订阅。许多研究人员(n=4221)在一项关于取消的后果的调查中发出了自己的声音。近三分之一的受访者(n=1241)选择对调查问题“有什么你想补充的吗?”留下免费文本回复。对这些答复的内容分析产生了六个主题,并从中得出三个主要结论。首先,研究人员对取消是好事还是坏事还没有达成共识。赞成取消的最常见论点是原则。反对取消的最常见的论点是,它损害了研究人员和研究。三分之一的自由文本回复表达了对取消的矛盾心理,通常是希望改变当前出版系统与同时承受取消后果之间的冲突。原则上对开放获取的普遍支持揭示了一个有缺陷的出版系统,因为在实践中,大多数人都感受到了在付费墙后面的著名期刊上发表文章的压力。其次,由于研究人员对高等教育机构和图书馆联盟正在进行的工作了解有限,他们很难对取消持赞成或反对的立场。最后,有迹象表明,这一取消使研究人员反思开放获取,并在一定程度上通过选择版权许可证和出版渠道改变了他们的出版模式。
{"title":"Swedish researchers’ responses to the cancellation of the big deal with Elsevier","authors":"Lisa Olsson, C. Lindelöw, Lovisa Österlund, Frida Jakobsson","doi":"10.1629/uksg.521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.521","url":null,"abstract":"In 2018, the Swedish library consortium, Bibsam, decided to cancel big deal subscriptions with Elsevier. Many researchers (n = 4,221) let their voices be heard in a survey on the consequences of the cancellation. Almost a third of them (n = 1,241) chose to leave free-text responses to the survey question ‘Is there anything you would like to add?’. A content analysis on these responses resulted in six themes and from these, three main conclusions are drawn. First, there is no consensus among researchers on whether the cancellation was for good or evil. The most common argument in favour of the cancellation was the principle. The most common argument against cancellation was that it harms researchers and research. A third of the free-text responses expressed ambivalence towards the cancellation, typically as a conflict between wanting to change the current publishing system and simultaneously suffering from the consequences of the cancellation. The general support for open access in principle reveals a flawed publishing system, as most feel the pressure to publish in prestigious journals behind paywalls in practice. Second, it was difficult for researchers to take a position for or against cancellation due to their limited knowledge of the ongoing work of higher education institutions and library consortia. Finally, there are indications that the cancellation made researchers reflect on open access and to some extent alter their publication pattern through their choice of copyright licence and publication channel.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49232819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Irish libraries and COVID-19: first reflections 爱尔兰图书馆与COVID-19:初步思考
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.522
Alan Carbery, H. Fallon, M. Higgins, E. Kennedy, A. Lawton, C. McCauley
On Thursday 14 May 2020 Maynooth University Library hosted a seminar via Zoom, entitled ‘Irish Libraries and COVID-19: First Reflections’. The seminar explored the response of the library sector to the global pandemic that has impacted every aspect of life. This article presents the case studies from the seminar.
2020年5月14日星期四,梅努斯大学图书馆通过Zoom举办了一场题为“爱尔兰图书馆与COVID-19:第一次反思”的研讨会。研讨会探讨了图书馆部门对影响生活各个方面的全球流行病的反应。本文介绍了研讨会上的案例研究。
{"title":"Irish libraries and COVID-19: first reflections","authors":"Alan Carbery, H. Fallon, M. Higgins, E. Kennedy, A. Lawton, C. McCauley","doi":"10.1629/uksg.522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.522","url":null,"abstract":"On Thursday 14 May 2020 Maynooth University Library hosted a seminar via Zoom, entitled ‘Irish Libraries and COVID-19: First Reflections’. The seminar explored the response of the library sector to the global pandemic that has impacted every aspect of life. This article presents the case studies from the seminar.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44295571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Open access and author rights: questioning Harvard’s open access policy 开放获取与作者权利:质疑哈佛大学的开放获取政策
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-10-20 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.525
Patrick H. Alexander
Harvard’s open access (OA) policy, which has become a template for many institutional OA policies, intrinsically undermines the rights of scholars, researchers, authors and university staff, and it adulterates a principal tenet of open access, namely, that authors should control the intellectual property rights to their material. Assessing the implications of Harvard’s open access policy in the light of Peter Suber’s landmark book, Open Access, as well as resources from the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) and Title 17 of the United States Code (USC), this article uncovers an intellectual ‘landgrab’ by universities that may at times not work in the interest of the author or creator of research and weakens the appeal of open access.
哈佛大学的开放获取政策已成为许多机构开放获取政策的模板,它从本质上损害了学者、研究人员、作者和大学工作人员的权利,并违背了开放获取的一个主要原则,即作者应控制其材料的知识产权。根据Peter Suber的里程碑式著作《开放获取》,以及学术出版和学术资源联盟(SPARC)和《美国法典》第17章的资源,评估哈佛大学开放获取政策的影响,这篇文章揭示了大学在知识上的“土地掠夺”,这种掠夺有时可能不符合研究作者或创作者的利益,并削弱了开放获取的吸引力。
{"title":"Open access and author rights: questioning Harvard’s open access policy","authors":"Patrick H. Alexander","doi":"10.1629/uksg.525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.525","url":null,"abstract":"Harvard’s open access (OA) policy, which has become a template for many institutional OA policies, intrinsically undermines the rights of scholars, researchers, authors and university staff, and it adulterates a principal tenet of open access, namely, that authors should control the intellectual property rights to their material. Assessing the implications of Harvard’s open access policy in the light of Peter Suber’s landmark book, Open Access, as well as resources from the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) and Title 17 of the United States Code (USC), this article uncovers an intellectual ‘landgrab’ by universities that may at times not work in the interest of the author or creator of research and weakens the appeal of open access.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46321291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Global electronic thesis and dissertation repositories – collection diversity and management issues 全球电子论文和论文库-收集多样性和管理问题
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.524
Fayaz Ahmad Loan, Ufaira Yaseen Shah
This article discovers the collection diversity of electronic thesis and dissertation (ETD) repositories based on key parameters such as regional distribution, subject classification, language diversity, etc. and identifies the critical management issues of the ETD repositories related to collection management, software management, content management and metadata policies. The ETD repositories were identified in the Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR). The required data were manually collected from the OpenDOAR and websites of repositories to achieve the prescribed objectives of the study. The data were later tabulated, analysed and interpreted using simple arithmetic techniques. The study was limited to the ETD repositories available in the OpenDOAR, and findings cannot be generalized across repositories and directories. It provides insights about ETD repositories worldwide, highlights their critical management issues and suggests mechanisms for their sustainable growth and development. This article is purely based on research and its findings are valid for scholars, faculty members, institutions – as well as administrators and managers of the ETD repositories.
本文基于区域分布、主题分类、语言多样性等关键参数,发现了电子论文库的收藏多样性,并确定了电子论文存储库在收藏管理、软件管理、内容管理和元数据策略方面的关键管理问题。ETD存储库是在开放存取存储库目录(OpenDOAR)中确定的。所需数据是从OpenDOAR和存储库网站手动收集的,以实现研究的规定目标。这些数据后来被制成表格,使用简单的算术技术进行分析和解释。这项研究仅限于OpenDOAR中可用的ETD存储库,研究结果不能在存储库和目录中推广。它提供了关于全球ETD存储库的见解,强调了它们的关键管理问题,并提出了它们可持续增长和发展的机制。这篇文章纯粹基于研究,其发现对学者、教员、机构以及ETD存储库的管理员和管理者都有效。
{"title":"Global electronic thesis and dissertation repositories – collection diversity and management issues","authors":"Fayaz Ahmad Loan, Ufaira Yaseen Shah","doi":"10.1629/UKSG.524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/UKSG.524","url":null,"abstract":"This article discovers the collection diversity of electronic thesis and dissertation (ETD) repositories based on key parameters such as regional distribution, subject classification, language diversity, etc. and identifies the critical management issues of the ETD repositories related to collection management, software management, content management and metadata policies. The ETD repositories were identified in the Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR). The required data were manually collected from the OpenDOAR and websites of repositories to achieve the prescribed objectives of the study. The data were later tabulated, analysed and interpreted using simple arithmetic techniques. The study was limited to the ETD repositories available in the OpenDOAR, and findings cannot be generalized across repositories and directories. It provides insights about ETD repositories worldwide, highlights their critical management issues and suggests mechanisms for their sustainable growth and development. This article is purely based on research and its findings are valid for scholars, faculty members, institutions – as well as administrators and managers of the ETD repositories.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47632090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
More readers in more places: the benefits of open access for scholarly books 更多地方的更多读者:学术书籍开放获取的好处
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-09-10 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.558
C. Neylon, Alkim Ozaygen, Lucy Montgomery, C. Huang, R. Pyne, Mithu Lucraft, Christina Emery
Open access to scholarly contents has grown substantially in recent years. This includes the number of books published open access online. However, there is limited study on how usage patterns (via downloads, citations and web visibility) of these books may differ from their closed counterparts. Such information is not only important for book publishers, but also for researchers in disciplines where books are the norm. This article reports on findings from comparing samples of books published by Springer Nature to shed light on differences in usage patterns across open access and closed books. The study includes a selection of 281 open access books and a sample of 3,653 closed books (drawn from 21,059 closed books using stratified random sampling). The books are stratified by combinations of book type, discipline and year of publication to enable likewise comparisons within each stratum and to maximise statistical power of the sample. The results show higher geographic diversity of usage, higher numbers of downloads and more citations for open access books across all strata. Importantly, open access books have increased access and usage for traditionally under-served populations.
近年来,学术内容的开放获取有了长足的发展。这包括在线开放获取出版的图书数量。然而,关于这些书的使用模式(通过下载、引用和网络可见性)与它们的封闭版本有何不同的研究有限。这些信息不仅对图书出版商很重要,而且对以书籍为标准的学科的研究人员也很重要。本文报告了通过比较b施普林格Nature出版的图书样本的发现,以阐明开放获取和封闭获取图书在使用模式上的差异。该研究包括281本开放获取书籍和3653本封闭书籍样本(采用分层随机抽样方法从21059本封闭书籍中抽取)。这些书是通过书籍类型,学科和出版年份的组合来分层的,以便在每个阶层内进行同样的比较,并最大限度地提高样本的统计能力。结果显示,在所有阶层中,开放获取图书的使用具有更高的地理多样性、更高的下载数量和更多的引用。重要的是,开放获取图书增加了传统上服务不足人群的获取和使用。
{"title":"More readers in more places: the benefits of open access for scholarly books","authors":"C. Neylon, Alkim Ozaygen, Lucy Montgomery, C. Huang, R. Pyne, Mithu Lucraft, Christina Emery","doi":"10.1629/uksg.558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.558","url":null,"abstract":"Open access to scholarly contents has grown substantially in recent years. This includes the number of books published open access online. However, there is limited study on how usage patterns (via downloads, citations and web visibility) of these books may differ from their closed counterparts. Such information is not only important for book publishers, but also for researchers in disciplines where books are the norm. This article reports on findings from comparing samples of books published by Springer Nature to shed light on differences in usage patterns across open access and closed books. The study includes a selection of 281 open access books and a sample of 3,653 closed books (drawn from 21,059 closed books using stratified random sampling). The books are stratified by combinations of book type, discipline and year of publication to enable likewise comparisons within each stratum and to maximise statistical power of the sample. The results show higher geographic diversity of usage, higher numbers of downloads and more citations for open access books across all strata. Importantly, open access books have increased access and usage for traditionally under-served populations.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88118051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
UK university libraries supporting transnational education (TNE) partnerships 英国大学图书馆支持跨国教育(TNE)伙伴关系
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-07-09 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.517
I. Collins, Irene Barranco Garcia
This article outlines the development and delivery of transnational education (TNE) by UK higher education institutions and reviews how libraries in the sector are supporting this. It reflects on findings from a library survey and event held in 2019 and the expectations and concerns about the support available to TNE students. It argues that whilst licensing of electronic content for TNE programmes is a key focus for both partners in a TNE relationship, effective library support for quality TNE provision also necessitates good internal and external communication and collaboration. Some suggestions on ways forward for libraries supporting TNE are made.
本文概述了英国高等教育机构跨国教育(TNE)的发展和交付,并回顾了该部门的图书馆如何支持这一点。它反映了2019年图书馆调查和活动的结果,以及对东北地区学生可获得的支持的期望和担忧。报告认为,虽然TNE项目的电子内容许可是TNE关系中双方的关键焦点,但图书馆对高质量TNE提供的有效支持也需要良好的内部和外部沟通与合作。对图书馆支持TNE的发展方向提出了一些建议。
{"title":"UK university libraries supporting transnational education (TNE)\u0000 partnerships","authors":"I. Collins, Irene Barranco Garcia","doi":"10.1629/uksg.517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.517","url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines the development and delivery of transnational education (TNE) by UK higher education institutions and reviews how libraries in the sector are supporting this. It reflects on findings from a library survey and event held in 2019 and the expectations and concerns about the support available to TNE students. It argues that whilst licensing of electronic content for TNE programmes is a key focus for both partners in a TNE relationship, effective library support for quality TNE provision also necessitates good internal and external communication and collaboration. Some suggestions on ways forward for libraries supporting TNE are made.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43364215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
‘At-risk articles’: the imperative to recover lost science “有风险的文章”:恢复失去的科学的必要性
IF 1.1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2020-06-24 DOI: 10.1629/uksg.514
J. Hatherill
Deceptive publishers have been discussed and written about from a multitude of perspectives and in a variety of disciplines, but scant attention has been devoted to a particular aspect of the issue: How we as scholarly communities are dealing with the research that appears in these outlets. It is problematic that the question is not being addressed, as this research is at risk of being lost. It is at risk because articles that appear in deceptive publications are not indexed, so they are less visible, discoverable and citable. Additionally, they are not preserved and therefore likely to disappear should the publisher cease its activities or neglect to carry out basic maintenance on their archives and servers. Furthermore, it is particularly problematic because this lost science is potentially valuable. In this article, it is argued that, rather than continuing to risk the loss of this potentially important research by ignoring its existence, research disciplines should look at developments in open peer review and the increasing use of preprint servers for their potential to recover and reintegrate these at-risk articles into the scholarly record.
人们已经从不同的角度和不同的学科对欺骗性出版商进行了讨论和著述,但很少有人关注这个问题的一个特定方面:我们作为学术团体如何处理出现在这些渠道上的研究。这个问题没有得到解决是有问题的,因为这项研究有丢失的危险。这是有风险的,因为出现在欺骗性出版物上的文章没有被索引,所以它们不那么可见、可发现和可引用。此外,它们没有得到保存,因此如果出版商停止其活动或忽视对其档案和服务器进行基本维护,它们可能会消失。此外,这尤其成问题,因为这门丢失的科学具有潜在的价值。在这篇文章中,我们认为,与其继续冒着失去这一潜在重要研究的风险而忽视它的存在,研究学科应该关注开放同行评审的发展和预印本服务器的日益使用,因为它们有可能恢复并重新将这些有风险的文章整合到学术记录中。
{"title":"‘At-risk articles’: the imperative to recover lost science","authors":"J. Hatherill","doi":"10.1629/uksg.514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.514","url":null,"abstract":"Deceptive publishers have been discussed and written about from a multitude of perspectives and in a variety of disciplines, but scant attention has been devoted to a particular aspect of the issue: How we as scholarly communities are dealing with the research that appears in these outlets. It is problematic that the question is not being addressed, as this research is at risk of being lost. It is at risk because articles that appear in deceptive publications are not indexed, so they are less visible, discoverable and citable. Additionally, they are not preserved and therefore likely to disappear should the publisher cease its activities or neglect to carry out basic maintenance on their archives and servers. Furthermore, it is particularly problematic because this lost science is potentially valuable. In this article, it is argued that, rather than continuing to risk the loss of this potentially important research by ignoring its existence, research disciplines should look at developments in open peer review and the increasing use of preprint servers for their potential to recover and reintegrate these at-risk articles into the scholarly record.","PeriodicalId":44531,"journal":{"name":"Insights-The UKSG Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41723472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
Insights-The UKSG Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1