首页 > 最新文献

Melanoma Management最新文献

英文 中文
Real-world experience with pembrolizumab toxicities in advanced melanoma patients: a single-center experience in the UK. pembrolizumab对晚期黑色素瘤患者毒性的真实世界经验:英国的单中心经验
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2018-04-24 eCollection Date: 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0028
Alfred Cp So, Ruth E Board

Aim: We aimed to characterize the safety profile of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma patients at our center to better reflect 'real-world' data on anti-PD-1 inhibitors.

Materials & methods: At our institution, 58 ipilimumab-naive and 30 ipilimumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma who have received pembrolizumab between June 2014 and June 2017 were included for analysis.

Results: Incidence of any-grade and grade 3/4 toxicities were 81.8% (n = 72) and 12.5% (n = 11), respectively. The most common side effects were skin-related (61.4%, n = 54) and gastrointestinal-related (51.1%, n = 45) events. In total, 25% of patients required oral steroids to manage immune-related adverse events with a median cumulative prednisolone dose of 683 mg (range: 40-3745 mg).

Conclusion: Pembrolizumab is well tolerated in 'real-world' patients and severe toxicities can be effectively managed with systemic steroids.

目的:我们旨在描述pembrolizumab在本中心晚期黑色素瘤患者中的安全性,以更好地反映抗pd -1抑制剂的“真实”数据。材料与方法:本研究纳入了2014年6月至2017年6月期间接受派姆单抗治疗的58例伊匹单抗初治和30例伊匹单抗治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者进行分析。结果:任意级和3/4级毒性发生率分别为81.8% (n = 72)和12.5% (n = 11)。最常见的副作用是皮肤相关(61.4%,n = 54)和胃肠道相关(51.1%,n = 45)事件。总的来说,25%的患者需要口服类固醇来控制免疫相关不良事件,泼尼松龙的中位累积剂量为683毫克(范围:40-3745毫克)。结论:Pembrolizumab在“现实世界”患者中耐受性良好,严重毒性可以通过全身类固醇有效控制。
{"title":"Real-world experience with pembrolizumab toxicities in advanced melanoma patients: a single-center experience in the UK.","authors":"Alfred Cp So,&nbsp;Ruth E Board","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2017-0028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to characterize the safety profile of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma patients at our center to better reflect 'real-world' data on anti-PD-1 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>At our institution, 58 ipilimumab-naive and 30 ipilimumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma who have received pembrolizumab between June 2014 and June 2017 were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incidence of any-grade and grade 3/4 toxicities were 81.8% (n = 72) and 12.5% (n = 11), respectively. The most common side effects were skin-related (61.4%, n = 54) and gastrointestinal-related (51.1%, n = 45) events. In total, 25% of patients required oral steroids to manage immune-related adverse events with a median cumulative prednisolone dose of 683 mg (range: 40-3745 mg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pembrolizumab is well tolerated in 'real-world' patients and severe toxicities can be effectively managed with systemic steroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"5 1","pages":"MMT05"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36471070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
Continuing and new roles for surgery in the management of patients with stage IV melanoma. 手术在IV期黑色素瘤患者治疗中的持续作用和新作用。
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2018-04-09 eCollection Date: 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0024
Erica B Friedman, John F Thompson
Until a few years ago, it was generally agreed that the best treatment option for melanoma patients with distant metastases (stage IV disease) was complete surgical resection, whenever possible. Those with more widespread disease or who were deemed unfit for surgery were referred to medical oncologists, but they had little to offer in the way of effective systemic therapy, and often simply recommended palliative end-of-life care. In the second decade of the 21st century, however, we have witnessed a dramatic change in the management of metastatic melanoma, with the introduction of two novel therapeutic drug classes – targeted small molecule inhibitors of the oncogenic BRAF V600 mutation or a downstream signaling target (MEK), and immune checkpoint inhibitors consisting of monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4 and PD-1. Accordingly, clinical decision making for patients with stage IV melanoma has become increasingly complex, and multiple clinical trials are in progress to determine the best strategies to combine or sequence systemic treatment and surgery. Some believe that a complete paradigm shift in the approach to patients with metastatic melanoma has occurred, with surgeons no longer playing any useful role. A more enlightened view is that we have entered an era of truly integrated and carefully coordinated multidisciplinary care of these patients. The reality is that surgery remains an excellent treatment option for patients with just one or a small number of distant metastases. Complete surgical resection offers a rapid, cost-effective means of rendering them clinically disease free and should be the first-line treatment in appropriately screened patients. This strategy is supported by the results of several clinical trials. Good survival outcomes were achieved in the CanvaxinTM stage IV trial, which compared patients who received adjuvant treatment with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) and an allogenic melanoma vaccine after complete resection of metastatic disease to patients who received only BCG with placebo after resection [1]. While the study did not show any benefit in the vaccine-treated arm, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates following complete surgical resection were approximately 40% in both groups, substantially higher than would have been expected if the patients had been treated with the systemic therapies that were available at the time. The Southwestern Oncology Group’s prospective multicenter trial of patients with surgically resectable metastatic melanoma also found that prolonged OS can be achieved by complete resection. While median relapse-free survival (RFS) was short (5 months), median OS was 21 months and 4-year survival was 31% [2]. In the first Multicenter Lymphadenectomy Trial, retrospective analysis of patients who developed distant metastases found that inclusion of surgery as part of the treatment plan conferred a survival advantage, even in patients who developed high-risk visceral metastases. If surgery was perfo
{"title":"Continuing and new roles for surgery in the management of patients with stage IV melanoma.","authors":"Erica B Friedman,&nbsp;John F Thompson","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2017-0024","url":null,"abstract":"Until a few years ago, it was generally agreed that the best treatment option for melanoma patients with distant metastases (stage IV disease) was complete surgical resection, whenever possible. Those with more widespread disease or who were deemed unfit for surgery were referred to medical oncologists, but they had little to offer in the way of effective systemic therapy, and often simply recommended palliative end-of-life care. In the second decade of the 21st century, however, we have witnessed a dramatic change in the management of metastatic melanoma, with the introduction of two novel therapeutic drug classes – targeted small molecule inhibitors of the oncogenic BRAF V600 mutation or a downstream signaling target (MEK), and immune checkpoint inhibitors consisting of monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4 and PD-1. Accordingly, clinical decision making for patients with stage IV melanoma has become increasingly complex, and multiple clinical trials are in progress to determine the best strategies to combine or sequence systemic treatment and surgery. Some believe that a complete paradigm shift in the approach to patients with metastatic melanoma has occurred, with surgeons no longer playing any useful role. A more enlightened view is that we have entered an era of truly integrated and carefully coordinated multidisciplinary care of these patients. The reality is that surgery remains an excellent treatment option for patients with just one or a small number of distant metastases. Complete surgical resection offers a rapid, cost-effective means of rendering them clinically disease free and should be the first-line treatment in appropriately screened patients. This strategy is supported by the results of several clinical trials. Good survival outcomes were achieved in the CanvaxinTM stage IV trial, which compared patients who received adjuvant treatment with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) and an allogenic melanoma vaccine after complete resection of metastatic disease to patients who received only BCG with placebo after resection [1]. While the study did not show any benefit in the vaccine-treated arm, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates following complete surgical resection were approximately 40% in both groups, substantially higher than would have been expected if the patients had been treated with the systemic therapies that were available at the time. The Southwestern Oncology Group’s prospective multicenter trial of patients with surgically resectable metastatic melanoma also found that prolonged OS can be achieved by complete resection. While median relapse-free survival (RFS) was short (5 months), median OS was 21 months and 4-year survival was 31% [2]. In the first Multicenter Lymphadenectomy Trial, retrospective analysis of patients who developed distant metastases found that inclusion of surgery as part of the treatment plan conferred a survival advantage, even in patients who developed high-risk visceral metastases. If surgery was perfo","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"5 1","pages":"MMT03"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36471136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Interferon is associated with improved survival for node-positive cutaneous melanoma: a single-institution experience. 干扰素与淋巴结阳性皮肤黑色素瘤生存率提高相关:单一机构经验
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2018-04-09 eCollection Date: 2018-06-01 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0025
Daniel E Oliver, Vernon K Sondak, Tobin Strom, Jonathan S Zager, Arash O Naghavi, Amod Sarnaik, Jane L Messina, Jimmy J Caudell, Andy M Trotti, Javier F Torres-Roca, Nikhil I Khushalani, Louis B Harrison

Aim: We assessed the role of adjuvant interferon on relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) in node-positive melanoma patients.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 385 node-positive patients without distant metastatic disease treated from 1998 to 2015. The surgery was therapeutic lymph node dissection (LND, n = 86) or sentinel lymph node biopsy ± completion LND (n = 270). 128 patients (33.2%) received adjuvant interferon.

Results: After a median follow-up of 70 months, interferon was associated with improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; p < 0.001), DMFS (HR: 0.59; p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.61; p = 0.003), controlling for tumor and nodal stage, node size, sex, primary site, adjuvant therapy and extracapsular extension. In an exploratory age-matched comparison of patients treated with (n = 67) and without (n = 233) adjuvant immunotherapy, interferon still showed improved RFS, DMFS and OS.

Conclusion: Adjuvant interferon appears to improve OS among node-positive melanoma patients in a modern experience, providing context for comparison in the adjuvant therapy landscape.

目的:我们评估了辅助干扰素对淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤患者无复发生存期(RFS)、无远处转移生存期(DMFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。方法:回顾性分析1998 - 2015年间385例无远处转移性肿瘤的淋巴结阳性患者。手术为治疗性淋巴结清扫(LND, n = 86)或前哨淋巴结活检±完成性淋巴结清扫(n = 270)。128例(33.2%)患者接受了辅助干扰素治疗。结果:中位随访70个月后,干扰素与RFS改善相关(风险比[HR]: 0.55;结论:在现代经验中,辅助干扰素似乎改善了淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤患者的OS,为辅助治疗领域的比较提供了背景。
{"title":"Interferon is associated with improved survival for node-positive cutaneous melanoma: a single-institution experience.","authors":"Daniel E Oliver,&nbsp;Vernon K Sondak,&nbsp;Tobin Strom,&nbsp;Jonathan S Zager,&nbsp;Arash O Naghavi,&nbsp;Amod Sarnaik,&nbsp;Jane L Messina,&nbsp;Jimmy J Caudell,&nbsp;Andy M Trotti,&nbsp;Javier F Torres-Roca,&nbsp;Nikhil I Khushalani,&nbsp;Louis B Harrison","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2017-0025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We assessed the role of adjuvant interferon on relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) in node-positive melanoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 385 node-positive patients without distant metastatic disease treated from 1998 to 2015. The surgery was therapeutic lymph node dissection (LND, n = 86) or sentinel lymph node biopsy ± completion LND (n = 270). 128 patients (33.2%) received adjuvant interferon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 70 months, interferon was associated with improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; p < 0.001), DMFS (HR: 0.59; p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.61; p = 0.003), controlling for tumor and nodal stage, node size, sex, primary site, adjuvant therapy and extracapsular extension. In an exploratory age-matched comparison of patients treated with (n = 67) and without (n = 233) adjuvant immunotherapy, interferon still showed improved RFS, DMFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant interferon appears to improve OS among node-positive melanoma patients in a modern experience, providing context for comparison in the adjuvant therapy landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"5 1","pages":"MMT02"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36471135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Gastrointestinal adverse events with combination of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma: a systematic review. 联合检查点抑制剂治疗晚期黑色素瘤的胃肠道不良事件:一项系统综述。
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2018-01-18 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0027
Elizabeth S Mearns, Jill A Bell, Aaron Galaznik, Stefanie M Puglielli, Allie B Cichewicz, Talia Boulanger, Ignacio Garcia-Ribas

Introduction: Immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, are revolutionizing the treatment of advanced melanoma. Combining CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors provides additional clinical benefit compared with single agents alone. However, combination therapy can increase the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs). This systematic review assessed the epidemiological, clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of GI AEs due to combination CIs in advanced melanoma.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched (December 2011 to December 2016) to identify primary studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and conference proceedings (2014-2016) evaluating adults treated with ≥2 CIs for advanced melanoma.

Results: Of the 3391 identified articles, 14 were included. Most studies examined the ipilimumab plus nivolumab combination. Any grade and grade 3-4 GI AEs occurred in more patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone. The most common grade 3-4 GI AEs were diarrhea and colitis. Grade 3-4 colitis occurred in more patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab. However, grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred at the same rate as ipilimumab alone. GI AEs developed with ipilimumab plus nivolumab approximately 6.6 weeks after initiating treatment. No studies assessing the economic or humanistic burden of GI AEs were identified.

Conclusion: GI AEs occurred at a higher rate and greater severity in patients treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy. The lack of research on economic and humanistic burden of GI AEs with combination CIs for advanced melanoma represents an unmet need in the literature and should be explored in future studies.

引言:免疫疗法,包括检查点抑制剂(CI),如细胞毒性T淋巴细胞抗原-4(CTLA-4)和程序性死亡-1(PD-1)抑制剂,正在彻底改变晚期黑色素瘤的治疗。与单独使用单一药物相比,CTLA-4和PD-1抑制剂的组合提供了额外的临床益处。然而,联合治疗会增加胃肠道不良事件(GI AE)的发生率。这项系统综述评估了晚期黑色素瘤合并CI引起的胃肠道AE的流行病学、临床、经济和人文负担。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆(2011年12月至2016年12月),以确定评估接受≥2 CI治疗的成人晚期黑色素瘤的初步研究、系统综述、荟萃分析和会议记录(2014-2016年)。结果:在3391篇已鉴定的文章中,14篇被纳入。大多数研究检查了易普利木单抗加尼沃单抗的组合。与单独接受ipilimumab或nivolumab治疗的患者相比,接受ipiliumab联合nivoluma治疗的患者出现任何级别和3-4级胃肠道AE的人数更多。最常见的3-4级胃肠道不良事件是腹泻和结肠炎。更多接受易普利木单抗联合尼沃单抗治疗的患者出现3-4级结肠炎。然而,3-4级腹泻的发生率与单独使用易普利木单抗的发生率相同。在开始治疗约6.6周后,易普利木单抗联合尼沃单抗出现胃肠道AE。没有发现评估胃肠道不良事件的经济或人文负担的研究。结论:与ipilimumab或nivolumab单药治疗相比,ipilimu单抗联合nivoluma治疗的患者胃肠道AE发生率更高,严重程度更高。缺乏对GI AE联合CI治疗晚期黑色素瘤的经济和人文负担的研究,这在文献中是一个未满足的需求,应在未来的研究中加以探索。
{"title":"Gastrointestinal adverse events with combination of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma: a systematic review.","authors":"Elizabeth S Mearns,&nbsp;Jill A Bell,&nbsp;Aaron Galaznik,&nbsp;Stefanie M Puglielli,&nbsp;Allie B Cichewicz,&nbsp;Talia Boulanger,&nbsp;Ignacio Garcia-Ribas","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0027","DOIUrl":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, are revolutionizing the treatment of advanced melanoma. Combining CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors provides additional clinical benefit compared with single agents alone. However, combination therapy can increase the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs). This systematic review assessed the epidemiological, clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of GI AEs due to combination CIs in advanced melanoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched (December 2011 to December 2016) to identify primary studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and conference proceedings (2014-2016) evaluating adults treated with ≥2 CIs for advanced melanoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3391 identified articles, 14 were included. Most studies examined the ipilimumab plus nivolumab combination. Any grade and grade 3-4 GI AEs occurred in more patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone. The most common grade 3-4 GI AEs were diarrhea and colitis. Grade 3-4 colitis occurred in more patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab. However, grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred at the same rate as ipilimumab alone. GI AEs developed with ipilimumab plus nivolumab approximately 6.6 weeks after initiating treatment. No studies assessing the economic or humanistic burden of GI AEs were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GI AEs occurred at a higher rate and greater severity in patients treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy. The lack of research on economic and humanistic burden of GI AEs with combination CIs for advanced melanoma represents an unmet need in the literature and should be explored in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"5 1","pages":"MMT01"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2018-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36471134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
An update on the relevance of vaccine research for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. 疫苗研究与转移性黑色素瘤治疗相关性的最新进展。
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-23 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0021
Robert O Dillman

Signal transduction inhibitors and anticheckpoint antibodies have significantly improved survival for metastatic melanoma patients, but most still die within 5 years. Vaccine approaches to induce immunity to well-characterized melanoma-associated antigens, or to antigens expressed on allogeneic tumor cell lines, have not resulted in approved agents. Despite the limitations associated with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, there now is one intralesional autologous vaccine approved for patients who have primarily soft-tissue metastases. There is continued interest in patient-specific vaccines, especially dendritic cell vaccines that utilize ex vivo loading of autologous antigen, thus bypassing certain in vivo immunosuppressive cells and cytokines. Because of their mechanism of action and limited toxicity, they are potentially synergistic or additive to other antimelanoma therapies.

信号转导抑制剂和抗检查点抗体显著提高了转移性黑色素瘤患者的生存率,但大多数患者仍在5年内死亡。诱导对特征良好的黑色素瘤相关抗原或对异基因肿瘤细胞系上表达的抗原免疫的疫苗方法尚未产生批准的制剂。尽管存在与免疫抑制肿瘤微环境相关的局限性,但现在有一种病变内自体疫苗被批准用于主要有软组织转移的患者。人们继续对患者特异性疫苗感兴趣,特别是利用自体抗原的离体装载,从而绕过某些体内免疫抑制细胞和细胞因子的树突状细胞疫苗。由于它们的作用机制和有限的毒性,它们有可能与其他抗黑色素瘤疗法协同或相加。
{"title":"An update on the relevance of vaccine research for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.","authors":"Robert O Dillman","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0021","DOIUrl":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Signal transduction inhibitors and anticheckpoint antibodies have significantly improved survival for metastatic melanoma patients, but most still die within 5 years. Vaccine approaches to induce immunity to well-characterized melanoma-associated antigens, or to antigens expressed on allogeneic tumor cell lines, have not resulted in approved agents. Despite the limitations associated with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, there now is one intralesional autologous vaccine approved for patients who have primarily soft-tissue metastases. There is continued interest in patient-specific vaccines, especially dendritic cell vaccines that utilize <i>ex vivo</i> loading of autologous antigen, thus bypassing certain <i>in vivo</i> immunosuppressive cells and cytokines. Because of their mechanism of action and limited toxicity, they are potentially synergistic or additive to other antimelanoma therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"4 4","pages":"203-215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36471133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Has the melanoma information tsunami become a maelstrom? 黑色素瘤信息海啸变成了一场漩涡吗?
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-09-14 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0020
John F Thompson, Alexander M Menzies
{"title":"Has the melanoma information tsunami become a maelstrom?","authors":"John F Thompson, Alexander M Menzies","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0020","DOIUrl":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"4 4","pages":"179-182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094604/pdf/mmt-04-179.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36471131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of the cutaneous adverse effects of antimelanoma therapy. 抗黑色素瘤治疗皮肤不良反应的处理。
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-22 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0015
Rose Congwei Liu, Germana Consuegra, Pablo Fernández-Peñas
The advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of advanced melanoma. However, these novel therapies are associated with adverse effects (AEs), of which cutaneous toxicities are the most frequently observed. These cutaneous AEs can exert significant morbidity and impact on patient quality of life, hence the recognition and management of AEs is fundamental in preventing interruption or cessation of survival-prolonging treatments. Additionally, knowledge of these AEs are necessary in order for healthcare professionals to counsel patients when starting treatment and in the initiation of AE prophylaxis. The incidence and clinical presentation of the cutaneous toxicities of novel melanoma therapies will be discussed, and treatment guidelines provided.
靶向治疗和免疫治疗的出现彻底改变了晚期黑色素瘤的治疗。然而,这些新疗法与不良反应(ae)相关,其中最常见的是皮肤毒性。这些皮肤不良事件可造成严重的发病率和影响患者的生活质量,因此,识别和管理不良事件是防止中断或停止延长生存治疗的基础。此外,了解这些不良事件是必要的,以便卫生保健专业人员在开始治疗和开始不良事件预防时向患者提供咨询。将讨论新的黑色素瘤治疗方法的皮肤毒性的发生率和临床表现,并提供治疗指南。
{"title":"Management of the cutaneous adverse effects of antimelanoma therapy.","authors":"Rose Congwei Liu,&nbsp;Germana Consuegra,&nbsp;Pablo Fernández-Peñas","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2017-0015","url":null,"abstract":"The advent of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of advanced melanoma. However, these novel therapies are associated with adverse effects (AEs), of which cutaneous toxicities are the most frequently observed. These cutaneous AEs can exert significant morbidity and impact on patient quality of life, hence the recognition and management of AEs is fundamental in preventing interruption or cessation of survival-prolonging treatments. Additionally, knowledge of these AEs are necessary in order for healthcare professionals to counsel patients when starting treatment and in the initiation of AE prophylaxis. The incidence and clinical presentation of the cutaneous toxicities of novel melanoma therapies will be discussed, and treatment guidelines provided.","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"4 4","pages":"187-202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36471132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Prognostic molecular testing in melanoma: ready for prime time? 黑色素瘤的预后分子检测:准备好了吗?
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-07-31 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0013
Jennifer Keller, Laurence P Diggs, Eddy C Hsueh
{"title":"Prognostic molecular testing in melanoma: ready for prime time?","authors":"Jennifer Keller,&nbsp;Laurence P Diggs,&nbsp;Eddy C Hsueh","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2017-0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"4 4","pages":"171-174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36470686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies in metastatic melanoma. 转移性黑色素瘤中的抗pd -1和PD-L1抗体。
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-21 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0018
Ester Simeone, Paolo A Ascierto
“ Genetic mutations and dysregulation of the immune system may be related in some patients and may have an important impact on the efficacy of therapies. ” The advent of monoclonal antibodies that target CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) or PD-1 checkpoints (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) has increased hopes of improved outcomes in advanced melanoma. However, resistance remains an important issue. Genetic mutations and dysregulation of the immune system may be related in some patients and may have an important impact on the efficacy of therapies. Another explanation may be that patients who progressed in the chemotherapy arm may then have received pembrolizumab. In the CheckMate 066 study in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma, ORR was also higher with first-line nivolumab compared with chemotherapy (dacarbazine; 40 vs 13.9%) [3] . Median OS of patients treated with nivolumab was not reached [4] . The other approved anti-PD-1, pembrolizumab, has shown a similar benefit as nivolumab. The Phase I KEYNOTE 001 study showed a median OS of 20 months for all studied doses and was 28 months in ipilimumab-naive patients. Similar results were seen at 3 years [5] . The Phase II KEYNOTE 002 study showed the benefit of pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy in patients previously treated with ipilimumab and a BRAF or MEK inhibitor, with an ORR of 22.2 and 27.6% for pembrolizumab 2 and 10 mg / kg, respectively, compared with 4.5% with chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was significantly prolonged with pembrolizumab at both doses, but median OS was only significantly improved in patients treated with pembrolizumab 10 mg / kg (14.7 vs. 11 months with chemotherapy; p = 0.01; hazard ratio = 0.74) [6] . In the KEYNOTE 006 Phase III trial, first- or second-line pembrolizumab in BRAF mutant or wild-type melanoma patients had a higher response rate compared with ipilimumab. OS at 2 years with pembrolizumab was 55 versus 43% with ipilimumab [7] . At median follow-up of nearly 3 years, 33-month OS and PFS rates with pembrolizumab compared with ipilimumab were 50 versus 39% and 31 versus 14%, respectively [8] . Moreover, responses were durable in 104 patients who stopped pembrolizumab treatment after 2 years as per the study protocol; at a median follow-up of at 9.7 months after completing 2 years of
{"title":"Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies in metastatic melanoma.","authors":"Ester Simeone,&nbsp;Paolo A Ascierto","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2017-0018","url":null,"abstract":"“ Genetic mutations and dysregulation of the immune system may be related in some patients and may have an important impact on the efficacy of therapies. ” The advent of monoclonal antibodies that target CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) or PD-1 checkpoints (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) has increased hopes of improved outcomes in advanced melanoma. However, resistance remains an important issue. Genetic mutations and dysregulation of the immune system may be related in some patients and may have an important impact on the efficacy of therapies. Another explanation may be that patients who progressed in the chemotherapy arm may then have received pembrolizumab. In the CheckMate 066 study in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma, ORR was also higher with first-line nivolumab compared with chemotherapy (dacarbazine; 40 vs 13.9%) [3] . Median OS of patients treated with nivolumab was not reached [4] . The other approved anti-PD-1, pembrolizumab, has shown a similar benefit as nivolumab. The Phase I KEYNOTE 001 study showed a median OS of 20 months for all studied doses and was 28 months in ipilimumab-naive patients. Similar results were seen at 3 years [5] . The Phase II KEYNOTE 002 study showed the benefit of pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy in patients previously treated with ipilimumab and a BRAF or MEK inhibitor, with an ORR of 22.2 and 27.6% for pembrolizumab 2 and 10 mg / kg, respectively, compared with 4.5% with chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was significantly prolonged with pembrolizumab at both doses, but median OS was only significantly improved in patients treated with pembrolizumab 10 mg / kg (14.7 vs. 11 months with chemotherapy; p = 0.01; hazard ratio = 0.74) [6] . In the KEYNOTE 006 Phase III trial, first- or second-line pembrolizumab in BRAF mutant or wild-type melanoma patients had a higher response rate compared with ipilimumab. OS at 2 years with pembrolizumab was 55 versus 43% with ipilimumab [7] . At median follow-up of nearly 3 years, 33-month OS and PFS rates with pembrolizumab compared with ipilimumab were 50 versus 39% and 31 versus 14%, respectively [8] . Moreover, responses were durable in 104 patients who stopped pembrolizumab treatment after 2 years as per the study protocol; at a median follow-up of at 9.7 months after completing 2 years of","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"4 4","pages":"175-178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36470687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
COMBATING NRAS MUTANT MELANOMA: FROM BENCH TO BEDSIDE. 对抗nras突变黑色素瘤:从实验室到床边。
IF 3.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-21 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0023
Ileabett M Echevarría-Vargas, Jessie Villanueva
“ Oncogenic NRAS plays a critical role in melanoma initiation and maintenance; however, to date there are no effective ways to directly block the activity of mutant NRAS. ” NRAS is the second most common oncogenic driver in melanoma, mutated predominantly at codon 61 in almost 30% of all melanomas [1] . Tumors bearing NRAS mutations are highly aggressive and are associated with shorter patient survival [2] . Despite the prevalence of NRAS mutations and the severity of the resulting disease, treatment for NRAS mutant melanoma has lagged far behind BRAF-mutant tumors. Here, we summarize the status of the most promising strategies, highlighting the successes and the gaps that remain to be filled. GTP guanine-nucleotide exchange mutant form of to GAPs, leading to NRAS activation and persistent signaling that triggers and
{"title":"COMBATING NRAS MUTANT MELANOMA: FROM BENCH TO BEDSIDE.","authors":"Ileabett M Echevarría-Vargas,&nbsp;Jessie Villanueva","doi":"10.2217/mmt-2017-0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/mmt-2017-0023","url":null,"abstract":"“ Oncogenic NRAS plays a critical role in melanoma initiation and maintenance; however, to date there are no effective ways to directly block the activity of mutant NRAS. ” NRAS is the second most common oncogenic driver in melanoma, mutated predominantly at codon 61 in almost 30% of all melanomas [1] . Tumors bearing NRAS mutations are highly aggressive and are associated with shorter patient survival [2] . Despite the prevalence of NRAS mutations and the severity of the resulting disease, treatment for NRAS mutant melanoma has lagged far behind BRAF-mutant tumors. Here, we summarize the status of the most promising strategies, highlighting the successes and the gaps that remain to be filled. GTP guanine-nucleotide exchange mutant form of to GAPs, leading to NRAS activation and persistent signaling that triggers and","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"4 4","pages":"183-186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/mmt-2017-0023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36118032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
期刊
Melanoma Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1