Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.067-085
Oxana M. Sedykh
In 1921, on the 600th anniversary of Dante Alighieri, the Silver Age philosopher and priest Pavel Florensky finished writing his book “Imaginaries in Geometry”, in which he demonstrated how the medieval picture of cosmos unfolded in “Divine Comedy” was confirmed in the light of modern science. The book was published in 1922 and has since been commented from various points of view. This article raises a question that has hardly been touched upon in the Florenskian scholarship: i.e. in what aspects does Florensky’s view of Dante fit into the “Danteana” (“Dante’s text”) of the Silver Age? In this respect, other approaches to Dante’s work in the context in which Florensky’s position was developed are considered, with a special focus on the views of Russian religious thinkers. One of the main hypotheses of this article is that such a way of posing this question is useful to explain the phenomenon of “Russian Dante”, whose originality is mentioned in a number of relevant studies. This article also reveals the way in which the perception of Dante by Russian thought is connected with the assessment of the historical and cultural position that his work occupies. In this regard, particular attention is paid to the re-evaluation of the consolidated vision of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance undertaken by Russian thought. In conclusion, the reason for the increased interest in the phenomenon of Dante within the Silver Age religious and philosophical thought is the recognition of proximity to their own ideological attitudes of the symbolic worldview as is presented in the “Divine Comedy”. In Pavel Florensky’s thought this type of worldview receives not only a philosophical, but also a scientific justification, and is defined by the concept of “concrete metaphysics”.
1921年，在但丁诞辰600周年之际，白银时代的哲学家和牧师帕维尔·弗洛伦斯基(Pavel Florensky)完成了他的著作《几何中的想象》(Imaginaries In Geometry)。在这本书中，他展示了《神曲》中展现的中世纪宇宙图景是如何在现代科学的光芒下得到证实的。这本书出版于1922年，从那时起人们就从不同的角度对它进行了评论。这篇文章提出了一个在弗洛伦斯基的学术研究中几乎没有触及的问题:即，弗洛伦斯基对但丁的看法在哪些方面符合白银时代的“但丁文本”?在这方面，在弗洛伦斯基的立场发展的背景下，考虑了但丁作品的其他方法，特别关注俄罗斯宗教思想家的观点。本文的一个主要假设是，这种提出问题的方式有助于解释“俄罗斯但丁”现象，其独创性在许多相关研究中都被提及。本文还揭示了俄罗斯思想对但丁的看法是如何与他的作品所占据的历史和文化地位的评估联系在一起的。在这方面，特别注意的是重新评价俄罗斯思想所承担的中世纪和文艺复兴的统一愿景。总之，白银时代宗教和哲学思想中对但丁现象越来越感兴趣的原因是认识到他们自己的意识形态态度，即“神曲”中所呈现的象征世界观。在帕维尔·弗洛伦斯基的思想中，这种世界观不仅得到了哲学的论证，而且得到了科学的论证，并被定义为“具体形而上学”的概念。
{"title":"The Concrete Metaphysics of the “Divine Comedy”: P. Florensky’s “Imaginaries in Geometry” and the Danteana of the Silver Age","authors":"Oxana M. Sedykh","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.067-085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.067-085","url":null,"abstract":"In 1921, on the 600th anniversary of Dante Alighieri, the Silver Age philosopher and priest Pavel Florensky finished writing his book “Imaginaries in Geometry”, in which he demonstrated how the medieval picture of cosmos unfolded in “Divine Comedy” was confirmed in the light of modern science. The book was published in 1922 and has since been commented from various points of view. This article raises a question that has hardly been touched upon in the Florenskian scholarship: i.e. in what aspects does Florensky’s view of Dante fit into the “Danteana” (“Dante’s text”) of the Silver Age? In this respect, other approaches to Dante’s work in the context in which Florensky’s position was developed are considered, with a special focus on the views of Russian religious thinkers. One of the main hypotheses of this article is that such a way of posing this question is useful to explain the phenomenon of “Russian Dante”, whose originality is mentioned in a number of relevant studies. This article also reveals the way in which the perception of Dante by Russian thought is connected with the assessment of the historical and cultural position that his work occupies. In this regard, particular attention is paid to the re-evaluation of the consolidated vision of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance undertaken by Russian thought. In conclusion, the reason for the increased interest in the phenomenon of Dante within the Silver Age religious and philosophical thought is the recognition of proximity to their own ideological attitudes of the symbolic worldview as is presented in the “Divine Comedy”. In Pavel Florensky’s thought this type of worldview receives not only a philosophical, but also a scientific justification, and is defined by the concept of “concrete metaphysics”.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114237520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.182-185
M. V. Maksimov
{"title":"[Finally, Baudelaire! Presentation at the Dissertation Defense]","authors":"M. V. Maksimov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.182-185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.182-185","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131537150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.103-115
A.A. Kravchenko-Novoselova
The year 2021 is a remarkable date for the Italian history: 160 years ago the unified Italian state was created. As a matter of fact, before then, the necessity to unify the country had been discussed for more than five centuries. One of the first who expressed these ideas was the great poet and politician Dante Alighieri, whose anniversary is also celebrated this year. In Russian Dante studies, the poet’s ideas on the Italian unification have been usually considered within the context of his own political views. It is the case of A.K. Dzhivelegov’s and I.N. Golenishchev-Kutuzov’s studies, which considered the biography and political activity of the famous Italian poet, whereas E.P. Naumov paid special attention to Dante’s view on the contemporary political situation in Europe. Our article is entirely dedicated to the development of the issue concerning the Italian unification in Dante Alighieri’s work. Basing on a systematic analysis of the entire body of Dante’s work, this article highlights the fact that the idea of unification is not only found in Dante’s political writings but is, in fact, a keynote of all his literary work. Although Dante considered the unification of Italy in the context of the utopian universal monarchy, he also saw the roots of this unification much deeper than that, i.e. in the organic unity of the Italian people. Our work emphasizes a given evolution of Dante’s philosophical and political views, in connection with the unfolding events of his time. In conclusion, this article provides a comprehensive description of Dante’s views on the unification of Italy, highlighting the necessity of this unification, the unwillingness of the country to it, as well as the reasons of this unwillingness coming from the contemporary municipalism.
{"title":"The Problem of the Unification of Italy in Dante Alighieri’s Works","authors":"A.A. Kravchenko-Novoselova","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.103-115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.103-115","url":null,"abstract":"The year 2021 is a remarkable date for the Italian history: 160 years ago the unified Italian state was created. As a matter of fact, before then, the necessity to unify the country had been discussed for more than five centuries. One of the first who expressed these ideas was the great poet and politician Dante Alighieri, whose anniversary is also celebrated this year. In Russian Dante studies, the poet’s ideas on the Italian unification have been usually considered within the context of his own political views. It is the case of A.K. Dzhivelegov’s and I.N. Golenishchev-Kutuzov’s studies, which considered the biography and political activity of the famous Italian poet, whereas E.P. Naumov paid special attention to Dante’s view on the contemporary political situation in Europe. Our article is entirely dedicated to the development of the issue concerning the Italian unification in Dante Alighieri’s work. Basing on a systematic analysis of the entire body of Dante’s work, this article highlights the fact that the idea of unification is not only found in Dante’s political writings but is, in fact, a keynote of all his literary work. Although Dante considered the unification of Italy in the context of the utopian universal monarchy, he also saw the roots of this unification much deeper than that, i.e. in the organic unity of the Italian people. Our work emphasizes a given evolution of Dante’s philosophical and political views, in connection with the unfolding events of his time. In conclusion, this article provides a comprehensive description of Dante’s views on the unification of Italy, highlighting the necessity of this unification, the unwillingness of the country to it, as well as the reasons of this unwillingness coming from the contemporary municipalism.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128672321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.176-181
M. V. Maksimov
The following essay examines the understanding and interpretation of Charles Baudelaire’s works in those of Irina Stepanovna Prikhodko. An analysis is given of the main stages in the investigations of the poet’s work. Accordingly, we look at how V.Ya. Bryusov and A.A. Blok received Baudelaire’s legacy; the understanding of the philosophical and aesthetic principles involved as well as the sources of Baudelaire’s poetic inspiration. The special attention of I.S. Prikhodko to Dante’s work and his Divine Comedy as the primary source of Baudelaire’s world view is also emphasized. An analysis is also given of the assessments of the poet’s work by writers and critics in the past in addition to contemporary foreign and Russian investigators. This essay also notes I.S. Prikhodko’s view of the least studied aspects of Baudelaire’s literary corpus and, in particular, the irrational principle in his work
{"title":"The Work of Charles Baudelaire in the Scientific Heritage of I.S. Prikhodko","authors":"M. V. Maksimov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.176-181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.176-181","url":null,"abstract":"The following essay examines the understanding and interpretation of Charles Baudelaire’s works in those of Irina Stepanovna Prikhodko. An analysis is given of the main stages in the investigations of the poet’s work. Accordingly, we look at how V.Ya. Bryusov and A.A. Blok received Baudelaire’s legacy; the understanding of the philosophical and aesthetic principles involved as well as the sources of Baudelaire’s poetic inspiration. The special attention of I.S. Prikhodko to Dante’s work and his Divine Comedy as the primary source of Baudelaire’s world view is also emphasized. An analysis is also given of the assessments of the poet’s work by writers and critics in the past in addition to contemporary foreign and Russian investigators. This essay also notes I.S. Prikhodko’s view of the least studied aspects of Baudelaire’s literary corpus and, in particular, the irrational principle in his work","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127502248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.138-154
S. Ilizarov, V. Kupriyanov
{"title":"Timofey Ivanovich Rainoff. The Outlines of the History of Russian philosophy of the 50-60s years","authors":"S. Ilizarov, V. Kupriyanov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.138-154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.138-154","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128333130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.026-039
A. Makarova
This article considers Russian Catholicism as a system of views characterized by the need for an independent Church authority, the special role of the Catholic Church in the history of Europe, and the importance of the unity of Churches around the Pope. Given all this, the article analyzes the criteria by which V.S. Solovyov could be included within the representatives of Russian Catholicism, albeit his confessional affiliation to the Catholic Church still remains controversial. The main part of this text is devoted to V.S. Solovyov’s relationship with the key issues of Russian Catholicism, i.e. the understanding of church unity, authority, and infallibility; the hierarchy’s and laity’s participation in the preservation of doctrinal truths; and finally the truth criteria for the decisions taken by the Ecumenical Councils. While these questions have been already raised in the writings of the main ideologist of philocatholicism, P.Y. Chaadayev, this article also demonstrates the way in which they occupy a crucial place in the heritage of the Russian Catholicism’s representatives from the last half of the 19th century: i.e. I.S. Gagarin and E.G. Volkonskaya. As a conclusion of this analysis, V.S. Solovyov’s views – which he expressed in his 1880s works – on the Church authority and on the special powers of Roman pontifices seem to partially converge with those of the conservative Russian Catholics. However, it is still possible to recognize a number of discrepancies between the two positions. These discrepancies would subsequently lead Solovyov to distance himself from Catholic apologetics to pursue a different approach in the understanding of Church infallibility. In this regard, an examination of Solovyov’s triads will be the key to identify the transformation, within his ecclesiological ideas, of the functions of secular and church authorities as well as of the need for an additional link between Christ and the believers.
{"title":"V.S. Solovyov and Russian Catholics: Similarities and Differences in the Understanding of Church Unity and Infallibility","authors":"A. Makarova","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.026-039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.026-039","url":null,"abstract":"This article considers Russian Catholicism as a system of views characterized by the need for an independent Church authority, the special role of the Catholic Church in the history of Europe, and the importance of the unity of Churches around the Pope. Given all this, the article analyzes the criteria by which V.S. Solovyov could be included within the representatives of Russian Catholicism, albeit his confessional affiliation to the Catholic Church still remains controversial. The main part of this text is devoted to V.S. Solovyov’s relationship with the key issues of Russian Catholicism, i.e. the understanding of church unity, authority, and infallibility; the hierarchy’s and laity’s participation in the preservation of doctrinal truths; and finally the truth criteria for the decisions taken by the Ecumenical Councils. While these questions have been already raised in the writings of the main ideologist of philocatholicism, P.Y. Chaadayev, this article also demonstrates the way in which they occupy a crucial place in the heritage of the Russian Catholicism’s representatives from the last half of the 19th century: i.e. I.S. Gagarin and E.G. Volkonskaya. As a conclusion of this analysis, V.S. Solovyov’s views – which he expressed in his 1880s works – on the Church authority and on the special powers of Roman pontifices seem to partially converge with those of the conservative Russian Catholics. However, it is still possible to recognize a number of discrepancies between the two positions. These discrepancies would subsequently lead Solovyov to distance himself from Catholic apologetics to pursue a different approach in the understanding of Church infallibility. In this regard, an examination of Solovyov’s triads will be the key to identify the transformation, within his ecclesiological ideas, of the functions of secular and church authorities as well as of the need for an additional link between Christ and the believers.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128527445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.006-025
B. Mezhuev
This article presents the first historiographical attempt to examine and analyze systematically all the newspaper and journal responses to the first edition of the basic treatise on the moral philosophy by Vl. Soloviev – The Justification of Good (1897). The first part of the article examines the positive reviews of the book that were submitted or published by the closest friends of the philosopher, supposedly, at his personal request. The analysis of the responses allows us to conclude that The Justification of Good was generally received by the Russian readership unfavorably. The reason for this was a problem of assigning the philosopher to one or another camp of Russian thought. Vl. Soloviev’s moral metaphysics and especially his socio-political views did not satisfy either liberals or conservatives, much less representatives of the radical left movements in social thought. The article notes that among the closest friends of Vl. Soloviev who gave a positive review of this treatise only E.L. Radlov was ready to accept the philosophical conception contained in The Justification of Good and support Soloviev in his polemic with the ethical views of Leo Tolstoy. Additionally, an examination of the positive reviews of The Justification of the Good is also important, because their authors as Soloviev’s friends could interpret some of the most difficult theses of the book based on the explanation given by the philosopher himself. It is possible to suppose that in preparing to publish his new philosophical work Vl. Soloviev expected that the first sympathetic reviews would contribute to a correct perception of his moral philosophy in Russian society.
{"title":"The First Edition of “The Justification of Good” (1897): the Responses by Contemporaries. Part One","authors":"B. Mezhuev","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.006-025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.006-025","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the first historiographical attempt to examine and analyze systematically all the newspaper and journal responses to the first edition of the basic treatise on the moral philosophy by Vl. Soloviev – The Justification of Good (1897). The first part of the article examines the positive reviews of the book that were submitted or published by the closest friends of the philosopher, supposedly, at his personal request. The analysis of the responses allows us to conclude that The Justification of Good was generally received by the Russian readership unfavorably. The reason for this was a problem of assigning the philosopher to one or another camp of Russian thought. Vl. Soloviev’s moral metaphysics and especially his socio-political views did not satisfy either liberals or conservatives, much less representatives of the radical left movements in social thought. The article notes that among the closest friends of Vl. Soloviev who gave a positive review of this treatise only E.L. Radlov was ready to accept the philosophical conception contained in The Justification of Good and support Soloviev in his polemic with the ethical views of Leo Tolstoy. Additionally, an examination of the positive reviews of The Justification of the Good is also important, because their authors as Soloviev’s friends could interpret some of the most difficult theses of the book based on the explanation given by the philosopher himself. It is possible to suppose that in preparing to publish his new philosophical work Vl. Soloviev expected that the first sympathetic reviews would contribute to a correct perception of his moral philosophy in Russian society.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131047970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.155-168
E. F. Karavaev, S.Y. Kolomiytsev
The paper examines the conventionalism that arose within the framework of the second positivism in European philosophy at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries, in connection with Russian science and philosophy. Despite its being popular and developed mainly in Western philosophy, we demonstrate that its ideas were also reflected in Russian culture. Moreover, we argue that it was the achievements of Russian mathematicians that influenced the emergence of this direction in European philosophy. To determine the place of conventionalism in Russian culture, the works of such scientists, philosophers and historians of science as A. Poincaré, N.V. Efimov, G.V. Florovsky, P.S. Yushkevich and others were used. The article also provides an overview of their main works and ideas. The analysis also deals with the influence of ideological and political factors on the development of philosophy in the XX century in Russia and the USSR. It is shown that the achievements of Russian mathematicians had a significant influence on the emergence of conventionalism, and the ideas of conventionalism, in turn, were reflected in the concepts of Russian thinkers concerning the philosophy of science and the philosophy of history. Thus, N.I. Lobachevsky can be called a harbinger of mathematical conventionalism, some ideas of P.S. Yushkevich and A.A. Bogdanov can be referred to natural-scientific conventionalism, and some ideas of G.V. Florovsky can be called historical conventionalism. We conclude that Russian science, firstly, was one of the reasons for the emergence of conventionalism in Europe, and secondly, Russian philosophy adopted and applied some of its ideas, in particular, concerning the impossibility of complete knowledge of the world or the relativity of ways of expressing truth, which remain relevant today.
{"title":"Ideas of Conventionalism in Russian Science and Philosophy","authors":"E. F. Karavaev, S.Y. Kolomiytsev","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.155-168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.155-168","url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the conventionalism that arose within the framework of the second positivism in European philosophy at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries, in connection with Russian science and philosophy. Despite its being popular and developed mainly in Western philosophy, we demonstrate that its ideas were also reflected in Russian culture. Moreover, we argue that it was the achievements of Russian mathematicians that influenced the emergence of this direction in European philosophy. To determine the place of conventionalism in Russian culture, the works of such scientists, philosophers and historians of science as A. Poincaré, N.V. Efimov, G.V. Florovsky, P.S. Yushkevich and others were used. The article also provides an overview of their main works and ideas. The analysis also deals with the influence of ideological and political factors on the development of philosophy in the XX century in Russia and the USSR. It is shown that the achievements of Russian mathematicians had a significant influence on the emergence of conventionalism, and the ideas of conventionalism, in turn, were reflected in the concepts of Russian thinkers concerning the philosophy of science and the philosophy of history. Thus, N.I. Lobachevsky can be called a harbinger of mathematical conventionalism, some ideas of P.S. Yushkevich and A.A. Bogdanov can be referred to natural-scientific conventionalism, and some ideas of G.V. Florovsky can be called historical conventionalism. We conclude that Russian science, firstly, was one of the reasons for the emergence of conventionalism in Europe, and secondly, Russian philosophy adopted and applied some of its ideas, in particular, concerning the impossibility of complete knowledge of the world or the relativity of ways of expressing truth, which remain relevant today.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"1073 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116470046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.188-194
M. V. Maksimov
We provide here information on youth projects of the Inter-regional Scholarly and Educational Center for the investigation of V.S. Solovyov’s legacy (the Solovyov Seminar). We note the importance of using various extracurricular means to introduce students to the theoretical and practical aspects of V.S. Solovyov’s legacy and those of other representatives of Russian philosophy and culture. This essay provides a survey of the student-run scholarly conference “Ideas, Events, People: Through the Pages of the Journal Solovyov Studies,” marking the journal’s 20th anniversary. We give an analysis of the topics presented at the conference and identify the philosophical problems that aroused the greatest interest among the participants.
{"title":"On Belonging to the True Being. Student Scientific Conference “Ideas, Events, Personalities: through the Pages of the Journal Solovyov Studies”","authors":"M. V. Maksimov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.188-194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.188-194","url":null,"abstract":"We provide here information on youth projects of the Inter-regional Scholarly and Educational Center for the investigation of V.S. Solovyov’s legacy (the Solovyov Seminar). We note the importance of using various extracurricular means to introduce students to the theoretical and practical aspects of V.S. Solovyov’s legacy and those of other representatives of Russian philosophy and culture. This essay provides a survey of the student-run scholarly conference “Ideas, Events, People: Through the Pages of the Journal Solovyov Studies,” marking the journal’s 20th anniversary. We give an analysis of the topics presented at the conference and identify the philosophical problems that aroused the greatest interest among the participants.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123913771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：