JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques最新文献

Achilles tendon ruptures commonly occur in physically active individuals and drastically alter the ability to perform recreational activities^1,2. Many patients want to continue participating in recreational activities, which can be facilitated by operatively treating the injury in a timely fashion, maximizing their functional recovery. The Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) Jig (Arthrex) can be utilized in patients with acute mid-substance Achilles tendon ruptures^3,4.

Description: Begin by positioning the patient prone with a thigh tourniquet on the operative side. Mark a 3-cm transverse incision 1 cm distal to the proximal Achilles stump and make the incision, taking care to protect the sural nerve laterally. Next, create a transverse paratenon incision and bluntly dissect it from the Achilles circumferentially. After gaining access to the proximal Achilles stump, clamp it with an Allis clamp and insert the PARS Jig between the Achilles tendon and paratenon, sliding it proximally to the myotendinous junction. To secure the jig to the proximal Achilles tendon, insert a guide pin into the jig position-1 hole. To pass sutures through the Achilles tendon, insert pins with their respective sutures into positions 2 through 5 and insert the FiberTape suture (Arthrex) in position 1. Remove the jig from the transverse incision, pulling the suture ends out of the incision. Once they are out, reorient the sutures on the medial and lateral sides to match their positions when initially placed. On both sides, wrap the blue suture around the 2 striped green-and-white sutures twice, and pull the blue suture through the looped green-and-white suture on the ipsilateral side. After doing that, fold the blue suture on itself to create a shuttling suture with the green-and-white suture. Next, pull on the medial non-looped green-and-white suture until it has been pulled out medially, and repeat that with the lateral non-looped green-and-white suture until it has been pulled out laterally, to create a locking stitch. Group the medial sutures together and the lateral sutures together, and utilize a free needle to further incorporate both bundles of sutures into the Achilles tendon. Next, create bilateral mini-incisions 1.5 cm proximal to the calcaneal tuberosity. Insert a rigid cannulated suture-passing device into each mini-incision, pass it through the distal Achilles tendon, load the ipsilateral suture bundle into the Nitinol wire, and pull the suture-passing device out the distal mini-incision to approximate the Achilles. To prepare the calcaneus, drill calcaneal tunnels toward the midline bilaterally, taking care to avoid convergence of the tunnels. Place a suture-passing needle in the tunnels to assist with placing the anchors. Next, tension the sutures, cycling them 5 to 10 times to remove any slack in the system. With the ankle in 15° of plantar flexion, anchor the sutures with cortical bioabsorbable in

Percutaneous femoral derotational osteotomies are performed in both adult and pediatric patients for excessive symptomatic femoral anteversion or retroversion^1,2. The aim of the procedure is to correct version abnormalities with use of a minimally invasive technique³.

Description: This is a percutaneous procedure that involves creation of femoral drill holes at the osteotomy site prior to reaming the canal⁴. External fixator pins are placed proximal and distal to the osteotomy site prior to completing the osteotomy. These pins are derotational markers for the surgeon and act to hold the correction with use of an external fixator while the interlocking screws are being placed. The pins are placed at a degree of divergence that is equal to the degree of intended derotation so that the pins will become parallel in the axial plane following derotation of the femur. The percutaneous osteotomy is then completed with use of an osteotome, and the trochanteric entry nail is passed across the osteotomy site while correcting rotation. Once rotation is fully corrected and the pins are parallel, the external fixator is placed to hold the rotation and interlocking screws are placed.

Alternatives: Nonoperative alternatives to this procedure include physical therapy for gait training and strengthening as well as modalities to address hip and knee pain that may be associated with version abnormalities. Although physical therapy is often prescribed, it must be noted that excess version is a fixed osseous structural pathology that therapy cannot address. Additionally, compensatory mechanisms that may be taught to improve gait and walk with a neutral foot progression angle may exacerbate hip or knee pathology as a result of the underlying version abnormality. Surgical alternatives include derotational osteotomies of the proximal or distal aspects of the femur with use of an open technique with plate fixation, as opposed to an intramedullary nail following percutaneous diaphyseal osteotomy as presented here¹. Additionally, an open technique with intramedullary nail fixation may be performed⁵.

Rationale: Excessive anteversion can cause both hip and knee symptoms, including hip pain, instability, labral and psoas pathology, and patellofemoral instability⁶. Excessive retroversion can cause impingement between the femoral neck and acetabulum, which results in pathology of the labrum and articular cartilage⁷. Additionally, abnormalities of version often lead to gait disturbances with frequent tripping and difficulty running⁸. Children with femoral version abnormalities have limited remodeling potential after age 8³. A derotational osteotomy may be performed to correct symptomatic excess femoral version in an older child or adolescent.

Expected outcomes: The patient may be weight

The double-incision technique with bone-tunnel fixation provides anatomical reattachment of a distal biceps tendon rupture to the radial tuberosity¹. This technique has been described by Boyd and Anderson² and was later modified by Morrey et al.³. The aim of the procedure is to achieve good return of elbow strength and motion with a low rate of neurological complications.

Description: A longitudinal antecubital incision of 3 to 4 cm allows dissection to identify and isolate the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN). Supination of the forearm protects the posterior interosseus nerve, which often cannot be visualized. The distal portion of the distal biceps should be carefully identified and exposed. A high-resistance nonresorbable suture is sewn with use of a Krackow technique to whipstitch the distal 4 cm of the tendon. Alternatively, 2 sutures (4 strands) can be utilized. A curved forceps is placed in the interosseous space to identify the location for the second 4-cm incision, on the dorsal proximal forearm over the tip of the forceps with the forearm pronated. The radial tuberosity is exposed by bluntly separating the common extensor tendons, followed by transection of the supinator fibers. Two drill holes are made 5 mm apart from one another for suture passage. The tendon is passed across a loop of wire, from the anterior to the posterior incision. With the elbow at 90° of flexion and full pronation, the tendon is docked into the trough and the sutures are tied.

Alternatives: Alternatively, the surgical repair of the distal biceps tendon rupture can be performed through a single anterior approach⁴. The exposure starts with a curved longitudinal antecubital incision, exploiting the interval between the brachioradialis and pronator teres with radial (lateral) retraction of the brachioradialis and medial retraction of the pronator teres. A single anterior incision allows repair through the use of various types of fixation devices, such as suture anchors, cortical buttons, and interference screws, but seems to carry an increased risk of neurological complications, especially in terms of paresthesias in the distribution of the LABCN. Nonoperative treatment might be acceptable for elderly patients with poor functional demands.

Rationale: The double-incision technique with bone-tunnel fixation provides good fixation strength with an expected low rate of neurological complications¹. This approach offers a useful treatment option for young and active patients with physically demanding lifestyles.

Expected outcomes: The double-incision technique is an effective and safe procedure to restore elbow functionality in patients with distal biceps tendon rupture. A meta-analysis^1,4-16 revealed no significant differences in postoperative functional scores following procedures performed via th

Insertion of a superior pubic ramus screw may be indicated for the treatment of a chronic pelvic discontinuity when utilizing acetabular distraction in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially in the setting of severe bone loss in the ischium. The aim of this procedure is to stabilize and prevent abduction failure of the acetabular component when utilizing acetabular distraction.

Description: With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, the acetabulum is exposed from a standard posterior approach for a revision THA. The location of the superior pubic root is identified after making a recess within the anteroinferior capsule. In order to ensure that the appropriate trajectory is obtained, C-arm imaging (inlet view and orthogonal obturator outlet views) is utilized to safely predrill the screw trajectory into the superior pubic ramus. A Kirschner wire (K-wire) is then placed into the hole. With use of a metal-cutting burr on the back table, customized peripheral screw holes are placed and then the acetabular component is slid and impacted into place over the K-wire. After cup insertion, the K-wire is removed and the superior pubic ramus screw can be placed and confirmed on fluoroscopy.

Alternatives: In general, chronic pelvic discontinuity requires surgical management with revision THA and has historically employed the use of a cup-cage construct, custom triflange implants, and/or jumbo acetabular cups with modular porous metal augments^1-5. With these treatment options, it is typically necessary to insert "kickstand" screws, which function to prevent abduction failure of the acetabular cup^4,5. However, in many cases of discontinuity, there may be severe ischial osteolysis, making ischial screw placement difficult or impossible. The superior pubic ramus, however, remains a reliable option that can be utilized for inferior screw fixation, even in cases of severe acetabular bone loss, and thus is especially beneficial in these difficult cases.

Rationale: The technique of acetabular distraction was developed because of limitations with alternative techniques. This procedure achieves cementless biologic fixation and eventual discontinuity healing as a result of lateral or peripheral acetabular distraction and resultant medial or central compression across the pelvic discontinuity. Acetabular distraction allows for intraoperative customization and cement unitization of the acetabular construct. This procedure requires the use of a "kickstand" screw or of inferior screw fixation in order to prevent abduction failure of the cup. These screws may be placed into either the ischium or superior pubic ramus. If the patient has substantial ischial osteolysis, ischial screw fixation may not be possible. If not placed in a systematic manner, pubic ramus screws can be technically challenging, and incorrect placement can result in neurovascular injury. Th

Temporary internal distraction (TID) is a surgical technique that can be utilized to correct severe scoliotic deformities. It allows the correction of severe curves (i.e., exceeding 90° to 100°) while minimizing the risk of neurologic injury associated with large corrections^1,2.

Description: TID can be performed as a single or staged procedure. During the first part, cephalad anchors are placed on the spine or ribs, and caudad anchors are placed on the spine or pelvis. Temporary distraction rods are inserted, osteotomies and/or releases are performed, and iterative distractions are utilized for the duration of the procedure. If adequate correction is achieved, the final fusion may be completed at this time. If not, a staged approach may be performed: the wound is closed and the patient is returned to the operating room 1 to 3 weeks later, at which time the temporary rods are removed, further distraction is performed, and the final fusion instrumentation is placed. Around 80% to 90% cumulative correction of the major coronal angle should be achievable.

Alternatives: The mainstay of treatment for large scoliotic curves is typically surgical correction and fusion. The main alternative to TID is traditional halo-gravity traction followed by fusion^3-5. In rare cases, nonoperative treatment may be appropriate if comorbidities and/or prognoses that preclude surgery exist.

Rationale: Halo traction is an effective adjunct for the treatment of large scoliotic curves; nonetheless, it has several disadvantages. First, halo traction requires a prolonged hospital stay with restriction of mobility and interference with daily activities. Second, this procedure may be less effective in cases of lumbar deformity, in which halo traction achieves limited tensile forces. Third, this procedure is associated with several risks, such as cranial nerve injuries and pin track complications^3-6. Finally, halo traction is contraindicated for certain conditions, such as cervical instability.TID, on the other hand, involves the application of iterative corrective forces directly to the area of deformity, allowing a stronger correction¹. TID takes advantage of the viscoelastic nature of the spine to achieve a higher percent correction compared with halo traction, with a low risk of neurologic injury^1,2. TID also avoids the prolonged hospital stay, mobility restriction, and complications associated with halo traction. When performed as a staged procedure, TID allows accurate assessment of neurologic function with the patient awake and moving.TID is most effective for severe scoliotic multisegment deformities rather than short rigid curves, which are better treated by osteotomies.

Expected outcomes: This procedure provides satisfactory outcomes and a low risk of complications. In our retrospective case series, TID resulted in a me

Complex intra-articular calcaneal fractures often resulted in secondary pain and deformity, requiring subsequent subtalar arthrodesis^1-3. The literature suggests that primary subtalar arthrodesis in the acute period has good functional results^2,3. The literature also demonstrates that posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis for chronic arthritis has favorable results⁵. Thus, we propose an approach to treating these difficult intra-articular calcaneal fractures that utilizes a posterior arthroscopic primary subtalar arthrodesis technique-aptly named Calcaneus Fracture and Posterior Arthroscopic Primary Subtalar Arthrodesis (C-PASTA).

Description: The procedure begins with the patient in the prone position. The subtalar joint is visualized with a 1.9-mm flexible camera through a standard posterior arthroscopic approach. With the help of the C-arm, position in the subtalar joint space is confirmed. The joint space is debrided with use of a 4-0 shaver and then prepared for arthrodesis arthroscopically with use of an osteotome and a burr. Next, we inject allograft demineralized matrix-based bone putty under direct arthroscopic visualization to fill residual gaps or defects. The arthrodesis is performed under fluoroscopic guidance with use of 2 guidewires followed by 2 to 3 titanium compression screws. The first screw is inserted along the posteromedial calcaneus and into the talar dome medially. The second is placed laterally into the head-neck junction of the talus. The third screw is placed distal to proximal from the plantar anterior process to the talar head. Finally, images are obtained in multiple views to ensure proper screw placement, and the screws are tightened sequentially to ensure equal compression across the joint.

Alternatives: Nonoperative treatment of calcaneal fractures includes cast immobilization with non-weight-bearing, although this treatment is typically reserved for nondisplaced, small extra-articular fractures⁶. Operative treatment of calcaneal fractures includes open reduction and internal fixation, which is traditionally performed via a sinus tarsi approach or extensile lateral approach. Primary subtalar arthrodesis has been utilized primarily for Sanders type-IV fractures⁶.

Rationale: Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures are associated with alarmingly high rates of posttraumatic arthritis (30% to 70% within 1 year of injury), and surgical outcomes are inversely proportional to the severity of the fracture pattern, with Sanders III and IV having the worst outcomes¹. Treating these most severe fracture patterns with primary open subtalar arthrodesis has shown favorable results in terms of union rates, pain scores, and functional outcomes throughout the literature^2,3. However, some authors have reported rates of revision as high as 60%⁴. Thus, the PASTA

Surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) remains challenging as no definitive surgical technique has emerged as the single best option in this varied patient population^1-3. Although the available surgical techniques may differ substantially, they all share the same goals of achieving and maintaining deformity correction, allowing physiological spinal growth, and reducing the number of operations and complications. Herein, we present a modified self-growing rod technique that represents a valid alternative to the existing surgical procedures for EOS.

Description: The patient is positioned prone on a radiolucent table, and the spine is prepared and draped in a standard fashion. A posterior midline skin incision is made from the upper to the lower instrumented level. Subperiosteal exposure of the spine is carried out, ensuring that capsules of the facet joints are spared. Pedicle screws are inserted bilaterally at the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumentation. Fixation with pedicle screws of at least 3 levels at the top and bottom end is usually advised; in nonambulatory patients with pelvic obliquity, caudal fixation can be extended to the pelvis with bilateral iliac screws. Sublaminar wires are positioned bilaterally at every level between the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumentation and are passed as medially as possible to avoid damage to the facet joints. Four 5-mm cobalt-chromium rods are cut, contoured, and inserted at each end of the construct. Ipsilateral rods are secured with use of sublaminar wires, making sure that they overlap over a sufficient length to allow for the remaining spinal growth. Correction of the deformity is achieved with use of a combination of cantilever maneuvers and apical translation by progressive and sequential tightening of the sublaminar wires. The wound is closed in layers over a subfascial drain. The patient is allowed free mobilization after surgery. No postoperative brace is required.

Alternatives: Nonoperative alternative treatment for EOS includes serial cast immobilization and bracing⁴. Alternative surgical treatments include traditional growing rods⁵, magnetically controlled growing rods⁶, the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib-expansion technique⁷, and the Shilla technique⁸. The use of compression-based systems (i.e., staples or tether)⁹ or early limited fusion has also been reported by other authors.

Rationale: The main advantage of our technique is that it relies on physiological spinal growth and does not require surgery or external devices for rod lengthening, which is particularly beneficial in frail patients with a neuromuscular disease in whom repeated surgery is not advised. Segmental fixation by sublaminar wires allows good control of the deformity apex during growth. Concerns regarding early fusion of the spine have

The fracture of the fifth metacarpal neck (also called a boxer's fracture) is the most common fracture of the hand^1,3. Displaced fractures often result in volar angulation of the metacarpal head, shortening, and residual malrotation^4-7. The present video article demonstrates the steps of performing intramedullary single-Kirschner-wire fixation of the fifth metacarpal neck¹, with the aim of the procedure being to achieve a closed reduction and internal stabilization of such a fracture. Although many fractures can be treated with a splint only, surgery should be performed in patients with excessive volar angulation, relevant shortening, or rotational deformity^5-7.

Description: For this procedure, the injured arm of the patient is placed on an arm table. The incision is made 1 to 2 cm longitudinally over the ulnar base of the fifth metacarpal bone. The cortical bone is opened with an awl, and a bent 1.6-mm Kirschner wire is inserted into the medullary canal. After reaching the fracture region, the fracture is anatomically reduced. The Kirschner wire is then advanced into the head of the fifth metacarpal, securing the reduction. Malrotation can be addressed in this stage by rotating the wire under fluoroscopic control. After ensuring anatomical reduction clinically and by fluoroscopy, the wire is shortened under the skin, followed by closure of the incision. We utilize a mid-hand brace for splinting.

Alternatives: Nonoperative treatment is common for fifth metacarpal neck fractures in the absence of malrotation, excessive angulation, and shortening. Other surgical techniques include a similar procedure that involves the use of multiple Kirschner wires, plate fixation, transverse Kirschner wire pinning, and, less commonly, retrograde headless screw fixation^2,7-9.

Rationale: The main advantage of this technique is the preservation of the metacarpophalangeal joint and the minimal soft-tissue damage. Additionally, the use of a single Kirschner wire provides stability at low cost. With some experience, this surgery can be performed within 20 minutes^1,9.

Expected outcomes: This procedure provides good fracture reduction and stabilization⁸. The outcome is usually satisfactory, with very low Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores¹. Malrotation, angulation, and shortening are sufficiently addressed, and the technique shows the same results as fixation performed with use of 2 intramedullary wires.

Important tips: Bending the Kirschner wire to ensure easy gliding in the medullary canal provides the opportunity to reduce the metacarpal neck once the wire is safely in the head.Aim distally as you open the cortical bone with the awl in order to facilitate the insertion of the Kirschner wire.The primary reduction should be made manually, not by the

Press-fit transfemoral osseointegration is the technique of inserting an intramedullary metal implant into the residual femur of an amputee; the implant is passed transcutaneously to attach to a standard prosthesis that includes a knee, tibia, ankle, and foot. This allows the prosthesis to be skeletally anchored, eliminating socket-related problems such as tissue compression that can provoke neurogenic pain, skin abrasion, and fitting problems resulting from residual limb size fluctuation¹. Amputees with osseointegrated prostheses typically wear their prosthesis more and experience better mobility, quality of life, and extremity proprioception compared to those with socket prostheses^2-4.

Description: We demonstrate the fundamentals of a single-stage procedure involving an impacted press-fit porous-coated titanium osseointegration implant. The preoperative evaluation is summarized and the specific surgical steps are described: exposure, osteotomy, canal preparation, implant insertion, (optional) targeted muscle reinnervation, muscle closure, soft-tissue contouring and stoma creation, and abutment insertion.

Alternatives: Amputees who are dissatisfied with their quality of life or mobility when using a socket prosthesis can attempt to modify their socket or activity level or accept their situation. Non-osseointegration surgical options to try to improve socket fit include bone lengthening and/or soft-tissue contouring. An alternative design is a screw-type osseointegration implant¹.

Rationale: Press-fit osseointegration can be provided for amputees having difficulty with socket wear⁵. Press-fit osseointegration usually provides superior mobility and quality of life compared with nonoperative and other operative options for patients expressing dissatisfaction for reasons such as those mentioned above, including poor fit, compromised energy transfer, skin pinching, compression, and abrasions.

Expected outcomes: Review articles describing the clinical outcomes of osseointegration consistently suggest that patients have improved prosthesis wear time, mobility, and quality of life compared with patients with a socket prosthesis^3,4. In a recent study² of 18 femoral and 13 tibial amputees who had osseointegration, Reif et al. showed significant improvements in prosthesis wear time, mobility, and multiple quality-of-life surveys at a mean follow-up of nearly 2 years. The most common postoperative complication for this procedure is low-grade soft-tissue infection, which is usually managed by a short course of oral antibiotics. Much less often, soft-tissue debridement or implant removal may be needed to manage infection. Periprosthetic fractures can nearly always be managed with familiar fracture fixation techniques and implant retention⁶.

Important tips: Template

Tibial plateau fractures account for approximately 1% to 2% of fractures in adults¹. These fractures exhibit a bimodal distribution as high-energy fractures in young patients and low-energy fragility fractures in elderly patients. The goal of operative treatment is restoration of joint stability, limb alignment, and articular surface congruity while minimizing complications such as stiffness, infection, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Open reduction and internal fixation with direct visualization of the articular reduction or indirect evaluation with fluoroscopy has traditionally been the standard treatment for displaced tibial plateau fractures. However, there has been concern regarding inadequate visualization of the articular surface with open tibial plateau fracture fixation, contributing to a fivefold increase in conversion to total knee arthroplasty². In addition, the risk of wound complications and infection has been reported to be as high as 12%^3,4. Knee arthroscopy with percutaneous, cannulated screw fixation provides a less invasive procedure with excellent visualization of the articular surface and allows for accurate reduction and fracture fixation compared with traditional open reduction and internal fixation techniques¹. Recent studies of arthroscopically assisted percutaneous screw fixation of tibial plateau fractures have reported excellent early clinical and radiographic outcomes and low complication rates^3,5,6.

Description: This technique involves the use of both arthroscopy and fluoroscopy to facilitate reduction and fixation of the tibial plateau fracture. Through a minimally invasive technique, the depressed articular joint surface is targeted with use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and intraoperative biplanar fluoroscopy. Reduction is then directly visualized with arthroscopy and fixation is performed with use of fluoroscopy. Lastly, restoration of the articular surface is confirmed with use of arthroscopy after definitive fixation. Modifications can be made as needed.

Alternatives: The traditional method for fixation of displaced tibial plateau fractures is open reduction and internal fixation. Articular reduction can be visualized directly with an open submeniscal arthrotomy and an ipsilateral femoral distractor or indirectly with fluoroscopy.

Rationale: Visualization of the articular surface is essential to achieve anatomic reduction of the joint line. Inspection of the posterior plateau is difficult with an open surgical approach. Arthroscopically assisted percutaneous screw fixation of a tibial plateau fracture may allow for improved restoration of articular surfaces through enhanced visualization. Less soft-tissue dissection is associated with lower morbidity and may result in less damage to the blood supply, lower rates of infection and wound complications, faster healing,