Pub Date : 2022-05-19DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2021.854
Yanis Klumpp
{"title":"Exhaustion of Remedies Under 28 USC § 1605(a)(3) in the Light of SNCF Holocaust Wrongdoing","authors":"Yanis Klumpp","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2021.854","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2021.854","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44736578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-19DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2022.867
Hannah Kail
{"title":"OSHA’s Failure to Protect America’s Essential Workers: The Need for Mandatory Rules in the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Hannah Kail","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.867","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.867","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42470822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-19DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2021.859
Christopher N. Warren
{"title":"Angels and Diplomats: A Pleromatic Paradigm for Human Rights","authors":"Christopher N. Warren","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2021.859","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2021.859","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43902293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-19DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2022.866
Vivi R. Besteman
The failure to recognize education as a fundamental constitutional right has meant that the quality of education in public schools varies greatly depending on where students live. This Note analyzes the origins of education litigation, current state constitutional standards for education quality, and previous arguments in support of a federal constitutional right to education. It then examines two recent cases, A.C. v. Raimondo and Gary B. v. Whitmer, and advocates for their novel stance on education rights: education is an implicit right that allows students to become meaningful participants in democracy.
由于不承认教育是一项基本的宪法权利，公立学校的教育质量因学生居住的地方而有很大差异。本文分析了教育诉讼的起源，现行州宪法对教育质量的标准，以及以前支持联邦宪法教育权的论点。然后，它研究了最近的两个案例，A.C.诉雷蒙多(Raimondo)和加里·b·诉惠特默(Gary B. v. Whitmer)，并倡导他们对教育权的新立场:教育是一项隐含的权利，它允许学生成为民主的有意义的参与者。
{"title":"Redefining the Right to Public Education","authors":"Vivi R. Besteman","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.866","url":null,"abstract":"The failure to recognize education as a fundamental constitutional right has meant that the quality of education in public schools varies greatly depending on where students live. This Note analyzes the origins of education litigation, current state constitutional standards for education quality, and previous arguments in support of a federal constitutional right to education. It then examines two recent cases, A.C. v. Raimondo and Gary B. v. Whitmer, and advocates for their novel stance on education rights: education is an implicit right that allows students to become meaningful participants in democracy.","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43989061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-19DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2022.870
A. Vestal
{"title":"Were the Tax Protesters Right about Ohio Statehood?","authors":"A. Vestal","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.870","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.870","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44834699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-13DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2021.849
S. Eizenstat
{"title":"Keynote Address: The Importance of Novel Legal Solutions to Provide Belated Justice for the Victims of the Holocaust","authors":"S. Eizenstat","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2021.849","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2021.849","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41687715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-13DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2022.848
J. Todres
It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health. Research shows that attorneys experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues at higher rates than the general population. Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being. We have known for years that students’ happiness and well-being tends to decline over their law school years, yet the response by most law schools has been patchwork, slow, and largely reactive. An unhealthy work-life balance remains the norm. This Article calls on law schools to do more to create a climate and culture in which students can achieve a healthier work-life balance. While there are a range of issues that need to be addressed, this Article focuses on the specific issue of law school culture discouraging taking time off. Ultimately, if law students—the newest members of our profession—are going to achieve and maintain a healthy work-life balance, it is not enough for law schools to simply encourage students to take care of themselves. Law school faculty and administrators need to create the conditions in which self-care is not only possible but welcome. A key component of that includes enabling students to take time off. * Jonathan Todres is a Distinguished University Professor and Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law. Thank you to Meera Deo, Jakki Petzold, and the Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) for their generosity in sharing LSSSE survey data and, more generally, for their important work on law student well-being issues. Thank you also to Caren Morrison and Nirej Sekhon for their helpful feedback on this Article and to Lauren Meeler for her excellent research assistance and valuable perspective on these issues. Finally, and most important, I want to thank the students in my Spring 2021 seminar for taking this journey with me. The legal profession is very fortunate to count you among its members. U N I V E R S I T Y O F P I T T S B U R G H L A W R E V I E W O N L I N E P A G E | 2 | V O L . 8 3 | 2 0 2 2 ISSN 1942-8405 (online) ● DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.848 http://lawreview.law.pitt.edu INTRODUCTION One of the most worthwhile assignments I have given to students in the past fifteen years was to stop working. Literally. I assigned them a 72-hour break from work.1 I did this out of growing concern that law schools are not doing enough to address the nonstop nature of the law school work culture and its adverse effects on student well-being. It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health.2 Research shows that “lawyers disproportionately experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues.”3 Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being.4 We have known for a while that students’ happiness and w
人们早就明白，加入和留在法律行业对健康不利。研究表明，律师经历酗酒、抑郁和其他心理健康问题的比率高于普通人群。同样，有大量研究表明，法学院对许多学生的幸福感产生了不利影响。多年来，我们都知道学生的幸福感和幸福感在法学院期间往往会下降，但大多数法学院的反应都是拼凑的、缓慢的，而且大多是被动的。不健康的工作与生活平衡仍然是常态。这篇文章呼吁法学院采取更多措施，创造一种氛围和文化，让学生能够实现更健康的工作与生活平衡。虽然有一系列问题需要解决，但这篇文章关注的是法学院文化中不鼓励休假的具体问题。最终，如果法学院学生——我们这个行业的最新成员——要实现并保持健康的工作与生活平衡，仅仅鼓励学生照顾好自己是不够的。法学院的教职员工和管理人员需要创造条件，让自我照顾不仅成为可能，而且受到欢迎。其中的一个关键组成部分包括让学生休假。*乔纳森·托德雷斯是佐治亚州立大学法学院的杰出大学教授和法学教授。感谢Meera Deo、Jakki Petzold和法学院学生参与度调查（LSSSE）慷慨分享LSSSE调查数据，更广泛地说，感谢他们在法学院学生幸福问题上所做的重要工作。也感谢Caren Morrison和Nirej Sekhon对本文的有益反馈，以及Lauren Meeler对这些问题的出色研究协助和宝贵观点。最后，也是最重要的一点，我要感谢参加2021年春季研讨会的学生们与我一起踏上这段旅程。法律界非常幸运，有你们在其中。U N I V E R S I T Y O F P I T S B U R G H L A W R E V I E W O N L I N E P A G E |2|V O L。8 3 | 2 0 2 2 ISSN 1942-8405（在线）● DOI 10.5195/法律审查.2022.848http://lawreview.law.pitt.edu引言在过去的十五年里，我给学生们做的最有价值的作业之一就是停止工作。字面上我给他们安排了72小时的休息时间。1我这样做是因为我越来越担心法学院在解决法学院工作文化的不间断性及其对学生福祉的不利影响方面做得不够。长期以来，人们一直认为，加入和继续从事法律职业对健康不利。2研究表明，“律师过度酗酒、抑郁和其他心理健康问题。”3同样，有大量研究表明，法学院对许多学生的幸福感产生了不利影响。4我们早就知道，学生的幸福和幸福感在法学院的几年里往往会下降。5尽管法学院有1 Jonathan Todres，《法学院学生的“替代作业”》，Jonathan Todres（2021年4月27日），http://jonathantodres.com/blog/2021/4/27/an-alternative-assignment-for-law-students[https://perma.cc/7AF5-LG6R]；另见下文第二部分。2 Jerome M.Organ，我们对律师的满意度/不满意度了解多少？《律师满意度和幸福感研究的元分析》，8 U.ST.THOMAS L.J.225268（2011）（“大约80%的律师一直认为自己‘满意’，但这一事实仍需与单独的经验数据相一致，这些数据表明律师过多地经历酗酒、抑郁和其他心理健康问题。”）；William W.Eaton等人，《职业与重度抑郁症的患病率》，《职业医学杂志》，第32期，第1079页，第1083页（1990年）（在美国所有专业人士中，律师在调整社会人口因素后患抑郁症的几率最高，他们患重度抑郁症的可能性是其他就业人群的3.6倍）；Martin E.P.Seligman、Paul R.Verkuil和Terry H.Kang，《为什么律师不高兴》，10 DEAKIN L.REV.49，53（2005）（“律师患心脏病、酗酒和吸毒的风险也比普通人群更大。”）。3器官，前注2，第268页。4参见Lawrence S.Krieger和Kennon M.Sheldon，《什么让律师快乐：重新定义职业成功的数据驱动处方》，83 GEO。WASH.L.修订版554560（2014）（“尤其是在之前法学院研究的背景下，目前的数据表明，在法学院期间被认为受到侵蚀的心理因素是对律师福祉最重要的因素。 ”）；另见Todd David Peterson和Elizabeth Waters Peterson，《遏制法学院学生抑郁的浪潮：法学院需要从积极心理学中学习什么》，9 YALE J.HEALTH POL'Y L.&ETICS 357（2009）；Jerome M.Organ、David B.Jaffe和Katherine M.Bender，《沉默中的痛苦：法学院学生的幸福感和法学院学生因药物使用和心理健康问题不愿寻求帮助的调查》，66 J.LEGAL EDUC。116（2016），https://jle.aals.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi？article=1370&context=home[https://perma.cc/A9H9-Q2NG]；Kennon M.Sheldon和Lawrence S.Krieger，法律教育对法律系学生有破坏作用吗？评估动机、价值观和幸福感的变化，22 BEHAV。科学与L.261（2004）。5 G.Andrew H.Benjamin、Alfred Kaszniak、Bruce Sales和Stephen Shanfield，《法律教育在法学院学生和律师产生心理困扰中的作用》，上午11点。W O R K L I F E B A L A N C E
{"title":"Work-Life Balance and the Need to Give Law Students a Break","authors":"J. Todres","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.848","url":null,"abstract":"It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health. Research shows that attorneys experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues at higher rates than the general population. Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being. We have known for years that students’ happiness and well-being tends to decline over their law school years, yet the response by most law schools has been patchwork, slow, and largely reactive. An unhealthy work-life balance remains the norm. This Article calls on law schools to do more to create a climate and culture in which students can achieve a healthier work-life balance. While there are a range of issues that need to be addressed, this Article focuses on the specific issue of law school culture discouraging taking time off. Ultimately, if law students—the newest members of our profession—are going to achieve and maintain a healthy work-life balance, it is not enough for law schools to simply encourage students to take care of themselves. Law school faculty and administrators need to create the conditions in which self-care is not only possible but welcome. A key component of that includes enabling students to take time off. * Jonathan Todres is a Distinguished University Professor and Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law. Thank you to Meera Deo, Jakki Petzold, and the Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) for their generosity in sharing LSSSE survey data and, more generally, for their important work on law student well-being issues. Thank you also to Caren Morrison and Nirej Sekhon for their helpful feedback on this Article and to Lauren Meeler for her excellent research assistance and valuable perspective on these issues. Finally, and most important, I want to thank the students in my Spring 2021 seminar for taking this journey with me. The legal profession is very fortunate to count you among its members. U N I V E R S I T Y O F P I T T S B U R G H L A W R E V I E W O N L I N E P A G E | 2 | V O L . 8 3 | 2 0 2 2 ISSN 1942-8405 (online) ● DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2022.848 http://lawreview.law.pitt.edu INTRODUCTION One of the most worthwhile assignments I have given to students in the past fifteen years was to stop working. Literally. I assigned them a 72-hour break from work.1 I did this out of growing concern that law schools are not doing enough to address the nonstop nature of the law school work culture and its adverse effects on student well-being. It has long been understood that joining, and staying in, the legal profession is not good for one’s health.2 Research shows that “lawyers disproportionately experience alcoholism, depression, and other mental health issues.”3 Similarly, there is significant research showing the detrimental effects of law school on many students’ well-being.4 We have known for a while that students’ happiness and w","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45296126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-13DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2021.852
V. Curran
{"title":"Appraising the U.S. Supreme Court’s Philipp Decision","authors":"V. Curran","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2021.852","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2021.852","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44403925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-19DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2022.839
Susan E. Bernstein
From social media to banking and healthcare, online services increasingly pervade the everyday lives of American consumers. Currently, there is no comprehensive federal regulation to ensure personal data privacy and protection, and consumers have no ownership rights over their personal data. There are various information and sector specific privacy laws, enforced by multiple agencies with overlapping jurisdiction. Moreover, without a principal federal law, many states have developed their own data privacy regulations. Not only is this collective scheme ineffective for American consumers, but it is also an inefficient form of government regulation and makes compliance difficult. This Note proposes creating the Consumer Data Privacy and Protection Bureau, an independent agency that would consolidate jurisdiction for efficient and effective regulation through a consumer protection framework. It would be created through a new law, the Data Privacy and Protection Act. In addition to creating the Consumer Data Privacy and Protection Bureau, this baseline, comprehensive federal legislation would provide basic data rights to consumers, and ease compliance for companies in the United States and abroad. With bipartisan support and an increasingly digital society, this type of reform is realistic, necessary, and timely.
{"title":"Consumer Data Protection and Privacy: A Proposal For a New Law and an Independent Agency","authors":"Susan E. Bernstein","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2022.839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.839","url":null,"abstract":"From social media to banking and healthcare, online services increasingly pervade the everyday lives of American consumers. Currently, there is no comprehensive federal regulation to ensure personal data privacy and protection, and consumers have no ownership rights over their personal data. There are various information and sector specific privacy laws, enforced by multiple agencies with overlapping jurisdiction. Moreover, without a principal federal law, many states have developed their own data privacy regulations. Not only is this collective scheme ineffective for American consumers, but it is also an inefficient form of government regulation and makes compliance difficult. This Note proposes creating the Consumer Data Privacy and Protection Bureau, an independent agency that would consolidate jurisdiction for efficient and effective regulation through a consumer protection framework. It would be created through a new law, the Data Privacy and Protection Act. In addition to creating the Consumer Data Privacy and Protection Bureau, this baseline, comprehensive federal legislation would provide basic data rights to consumers, and ease compliance for companies in the United States and abroad. With bipartisan support and an increasingly digital society, this type of reform is realistic, necessary, and timely.","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44776788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-10DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2021.835
Brandon R. Magner
{"title":"The Biden NLRB and Industrial Democracy's Remnants","authors":"Brandon R. Magner","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2021.835","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2021.835","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44686,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48067519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：