Academic Pathology最新文献

Given the trend of condensed preclinical curricula in medical schools nationwide, creating meaningful pathology learning experiences within the clinical and post-clinical curricula is important to both enhance student understanding of how pathology integrates into daily healthcare delivery and spark potential career interest in the field. While pathology electives are a common modality for medical students to explore pathology, they frequently render students passive observers of daily clinical workflows (often in grossing and sign-out rooms of surgical pathology). This can have a negative impact on student engagement with their pathology clinical teams and on their satisfaction with the pathology elective experience. As such, we aim to describe our institutional experience in creating a new pathology elective structure, the “Pathology Passport,” which leverages intentional student engagement with existing pathology workflows and introduces a means of criterion-based grading. Data collected from student pre- and post-elective surveys demonstrate the elective's positive impact on students' perceived understanding of pathology and their overall learning experience. We hope that our resources can be leveraged at other institutions and even other non-pathology clerkship/elective rotations to promote active engagement of students in clinical workflows while providing clear expectations for grading.

This study explores the effectiveness of asynchronous video material as a supplementary educational tool for trainees in hematopathology. Traditional pedagogical methods often rely heavily on faculty involvement, potentially limiting the breadth of information trainees receive due to constraints in faculty time and the variety of cases covered in a limited time interval/rotation. Asynchronous video-based learning presents a potential solution to these challenges. This concept has been utilized effectively in various fields of medical education. In this study, we describe our implementation of an educational program utilizing asynchronous video material to supplement traditional learning methods for peripheral blood smear interpretation for learners on a hematopathology clerkship. Following a pre-test/post-test assessment with 13 trainees, we analyzed the correlation between video viewing percentage and changes in test scores. The results indicate an improvement in test scores following exposure to video content, supporting the positive impact of asynchronous video material on hematopathology education. Trainees had positive feedback regarding this new educational tool. This study suggests that such self-directed learning could enhance traditional teaching methods, ensuring broader and more consistent coverage of hematopathology concepts.

Stanford Health Care, which provides about 7% of overall healthcare to approximately 9 million people in the San Francisco Bay Area, has undergone significant changes due to the opening of a second hospital in late 2019 and, more importantly, the COVID-19 pandemic. We examine the impact of these events on anatomic pathology (AP) cases, aiming to enhance operational efficiency in response to evolving healthcare demands. We extracted historical census, admission, lab tests, operation, and AP data since 2015. An approximately 45% increase in the volume of laboratory tests (P < 0.0001) and a 17% increase in AP cases (P < 0.0001) occurred post-pandemic. These increases were associated with progressively increasing (P < 0.0001) hospital census. Census increase stemmed from higher admission through the emergency department (ED), and longer lengths of stay mostly for transfer patients, likely due to the greater capability of the new ED and changes in regional and local practice patterns post-pandemic. Higher census led to overcapacity, which has an inverted U relationship that peaked at 103% capacity for AP cases and 114% capacity for laboratory tests. Overcapacity led to a lower capability to perform clinical activities, particularly those related to surgical procedures. We conclude by suggesting parameters for optimal operations in the post-pandemic era.

Most Pathology residents take the Anatomic Pathology and/or Clinical Pathology primary pathology certification examination(s) near the end of their final year of training (i.e., Spring), whereas some postpone the examination(s) to the Fall administration of that year or even later. We compared the Spring and Fall administration pass rates of initial primary certification candidates for those who graduated in the same year they took the examination. We also compared the pass rates of same-year graduates with individuals who postponed the examination for a year or more. We also surveyed the candidates regarding the reasons they chose the Spring or Fall administration. Candidates who chose the earlier (i.e., Spring) administration were more likely to pass compared with those who took the later Fall administration (p = 0.0026 for Anatomic Pathology; p = 0.0004 for Clinical Pathology). Delaying the certifying exams beyond the calendar year of residency graduation was associated with a higher failure rate (p < 0.0001 for both Anatomic and Clinical Pathology). The survey results suggest that residents often take their certification examinations earlier to not interfere with fellowship training, because it coincides with the completion of residency training, or it is expected by their program. Pathology residents are more likely to pass the primary certification examinations when they are taken closer to the end of training, rather than postponing it to a later administration. Pathology residency program directors should encourage residents, who are deemed ready, to take their certification examinations at the earliest possible administration.

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are observable activities that define the practice of medicine and provide a framework of evaluation that has been incorporated into US medical school curricula in both undergraduate and graduate medical education. This manuscript describes the development of an entrustment scale and formative and summative evaluations for pathology EPAs, outlines a process for faculty development that was employed in a pilot study implementing two Anatomic Pathology and two Clinical Pathology EPAs in volunteer pathology residency programs, and provides initial validation data for the proposed pathology entrustment scales. Prior to implementation, faculty development was necessary to train faculty on the entrustment scale for each given activity. A “train the trainer” model used performance dimension training and frame of reference training to train key faculty at each institution. The session utilized vignettes to practice determination of entrustment ratings and development of feedback for trainees as to strengths and weaknesses in the performance of these activities. Validity of the entrustment scale is discussed using the Messick framework, based on concepts of content, response process, and internal structure. This model of entrustment scales, formative and summative assessments, and faculty development can be utilized for any pathology EPA and provides a roadmap for programs to design and implement EPA assessments into pathology residency training.

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are observable clinical skills and/or procedures that have been introduced into medical education at the student and resident levels in most specialties to determine readiness to advance into residency or independent practice, respectively. This publication describes the process and outcomes of a pilot study looking at the feasibility of using two anatomic pathology and two clinical pathology EPAs in pathology residency in 6 pathology residency programs that volunteered for the study. Faculty development on EPAs and their assessment was provided to pilot program faculty, and EPA assessment tools were developed and used by the pilot programs. Pre- and post-study surveys were given to participating residents, faculty, and program directors to gauge baseline practices and to gather feedback on the EPA implementation experience. Results demonstrated overall good feasibility in implementing EPAs. Faculty acceptance of EPAs varied and was less than that of program directors. Residents reported a significant increase in the frequency with which faculty provided formative assessments that included specific examples of performance and specific ways to improve, as well as increased frequency with which faculty provided summative assessments that included specific ways to improve. EPAs offered the most benefit in setting clear expectations for performance of each task, for providing more specific feedback to residents, and in increasing Program director's understanding of resident strengths abilities and weaknesses.

Pathologists use certain terminologies to communicate uncertainty in pathology reports. The message conveyed in pathology reports may be interpreted differently by clinicians leading to possible miscommunication. We aimed to compare the interpretation and impact of uncertainty phrases between pathologists and clinicians. A survey with examples of uncertain diagnoses containing (“suspicious for”, “indefinite for”, “favor”, “cannot exclude”, “suggestive of”, “compatible with”, “cannot rule out”, “highly suspicious for” and “consistent with”) was sent to pathologists and clinicians. For each diagnosis, participants assigned a level of certainty from 1 to 10 and were asked whether they would recommend treatment based on such phraseology. Thirty-six responses (from 7 pathologists, 10 surgeons, 8 pediatric oncologists, 8 medical oncologists, 2 radiation oncologists and 1 diagnostic radiologist) were received. Pathologists had a narrower range of uncertainty compared to clinicians. Wide variation between both groups was seen for all phrases except “compatible with” and “highly suspicious for”. ‘Indefinite for' showed the lowest mean of certainty (4.67 for pathologists; 4.00 for clinicians) whereas 'consistent with' had the highest (8.83 for pathologists and 9.38 for clinicians). There was a significant difference in the degree of certainty between both groups for “compatible with” (7.83 for pathologists and 9.06 for clinicians, p = .009). For treatment decisions, pathologists and clinicians agreed on initiating treatment when “consistent with” and “compatible with” were used and gave variable responses for the other terms. They proposed opposing treatment recommendations for “favor”. Pathologists and clinicians varied in interpretation of uncertainty phrases which may impact treatment.

The number of graduating allopathic (MD) medical students matching into pathology has declined in recent years, while the number of osteopathic (DO) medical students has increased modestly, given the rapid expansion of osteopathic medical schools. Nonscholarly publications and materials on the internet often perpetuate negative perceptions of osteopathic physicians. Anecdotally, perspectives exist that some pathology residency programs are not DO-friendly; however, the reasons and how widespread an effect this might be are unclear. Our survey queried pathology chairs and residency program directors about their perceptions of osteopathic applicants and their knowledge of osteopathic medical school/training in general. This study utilized two similar, parallel surveys of pathology chairs and residency program directors with general questions structured around the perceptions and knowledge of both allopathic and osteopathic physicians, their medical training, and the consideration of osteopathic applicants to pathology residency. Pathology residency leaders acknowledge some negative perceptions of osteopathic physicians in the medical profession, the news, and social media. They also have some knowledge and perception gaps regarding osteopathic training and applicants, although experience with training osteopathic physicians as residents has been equivalent to that with allopathic physicians, and consideration appears to be fairly equal for osteopathic applicants. Even though negative perceptions of osteopathic physicians persist in news and social media, our surveys demonstrate that the leadership of pathology residency programs does not hold the same degree of bias and that DOs perform well in allopathic pathology residency programs without evidence of inferior outcomes.