Academic Pathology最新文献

Health literacy has been defined and studied as an important component of a patient's ability to understand and obtain appropriate healthcare. However, a laboratory component of health literacy, as it pertains to the understanding of laboratory tests and their results, has not been previously defined. An analysis of readily available health literacy tools was conducted to determine laboratory testing-specific content representation. One hundred and four health literacy tools from a publicly available database were analyzed. Many of the health literacy tools were found to be lacking items related to laboratory testing. Of the health literacy tools that did contain a laboratory component, they were categorized pertaining to the laboratory test/testing content. Emerging from this process, eight competencies were identified that encompassed the entire range of laboratory-related aspects of health literacy. We propose that these eight competencies form the basis of a set of competencies needed for one to access, interpret, and act on laboratory results–a capacity we are referring to as “laboratory literacy.”

The field of pathology is facing an inflection point where the demand for pathology services is not being met by a corresponding rise in recruitment into the field. Many of the myths about the field of pathology have been dispelled elsewhere, but there have not been many formal accounts of the experience medical students’ face when finding their path to pathology. Because of challenges in the visibility of pathology as a specialty and not simply a subject required for United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1, students tend to fall into one of two categories: early differentiators or late discoverers. Here, we provide anecdotal accounts of these two paths at institutions with different curricular designs and provide a first-hand account of the challenges we faced and opportunities discovered in our journeys to pathology. Based on these experiences, we offer suggestions for ways to address some of the issues medical students must navigate when trying to explore pathology in curricula not built for such exploration.

Faculty from the University of Florida Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine developed an asynchronous, fully virtual pathology elective for medical students that emphasizes both foundational pathology concepts as well as the role of pathologists in the broader health system. The program includes ten core modules as well as several selective modules which allows students to tailor their coursework to better align with their desired specialty. After completing each module, students were required to concisely summarize the topic in the form of a 280-character tweet. Students were surveyed immediately after finishing the course and again one year after finishing the course to assess the effectiveness of the course in teaching students about pathology. Survey results showed significant improvement in student knowledge about the field of pathology and high levels of satisfaction with the course content and delivery. The tweet summaries required in the course provided a unique challenge for students. Although the course was initially developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment has continued steadily through 2023. Our study suggests that online pathology electives can be an effective way to increase medical student exposure to pathology and facilitate learning about the field of pathology, especially among students who may not ultimately pursue a career in pathology.

Socio-historical barriers remain a concern in Academic Medicine. Regrettably, despite the modern cultural era defined by increased recognition and response to such issues, widespread covert barriers and misperceptions continue to limit the advancement of many, in particular, international medical graduate physicians (IMGs) who represent a significant proportion of the US physician workforce. Adversity is experienced in the form of cultural racism, affinity bias, and underrepresentation in distinct specialties as well as in leadership roles. Often, these unnecessary hardships exacerbate pre-existing discrimination in Academic Medicine, further marginalizing IMGs. In this article, we discuss the prevalence of “medical inferiority bias” and the resulting impact on US healthcare, specifying considerations to be made from a policy perspective.

Over the past decade, competency-based medical education (CBME) has gained momentum in the United States to develop trainees into independent and confident physicians by the end of their training. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are an established methodology for assessing trainee development through an outcomes-driven rather than a time-based model. While EPAs have been utilized as an assessment tool for CBME in Europe and Canada, their validation and implementation in some medical specialties has occurred more recently in the United States. Pediatrics was the first specialty in the US to conduct a large-scale UME-GME pilot. Pathology Residency EPAs were published in 2018; however, implementation in training programs has been slow. We have piloted EPAs in our residency program's surgical pathology rotation and propose a unique set of 4 surgical pathology EPAs to track trainee preparedness for independent practice.

Surgical pathology residency training in the United States lags behind other specialties in quality control and graduated responsibility to train independent pathologists capable of seamlessly entering practice after training. We observed that our traditional 3-day-cycle surgical pathology cycle (day 1–grossing; day 2 –biopsies/frozens/preview; day 3 – sign-out) consistently and negatively impacted resident education by reducing preview time, case follow-up, immunohistochemical stain (IHC) interpretation, and molecular study integration. We aimed to create a modern surgical pathology rotation that improved performance and outcomes. We innovated our rotation to enhance resident education and ensure graduated responsibility. A novel 6-day cycle was created composed of 2 grossing days, 1 frozens/biopsies/preview days, 2 dedicated sign-out days, and 1 frozens/biopsies/case completion day. Residents completed surveys before implementing the new rotation and 6 months after implementation to track self-assessment of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestone performance and internal quality control metrics. Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) annual evaluations were assessed in paired PGY levels pre- and post-intervention. After implementation, there was a statistically significant improvement in self-assessment of levels 4 and 5 of ACGME milestones and improved satisfaction of quality metrics, including time for previewing, reviewing IHC, graduated responsibility, and perceived readiness for independent practice. CCC evaluations showed overall maintained performance levels, with trends towards improvements in junior resident classes. Our 6-day cycle adequately fulfills the current demands of our sizeable academic center's surgical pathology training and can be a model for pathology residencies looking to modernize their surgical pathology rotations and resident education.

Innovative and self-sustaining clinical genomics laboratories specializing in cutting-edge oncology testing are critical to the success of academic pathology departments and resident and fellow education in molecular pathology. However, the pressures and challenges facing these laboratories are numerous, including the complexities of validating comprehensive cancer next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, competition from commercial laboratories, and the reimbursement and regulatory hurdles inherent in high-complexity testing. Cross-institutional collaborations, including shared assay content and interpretative frameworks, are a valuable element to academic laboratory success. To address these and other needs, the Genomics Organization for Academic Laboratories (GOAL) was conceived in 2018, incorporated in 2020 and has grown to include 29 participating institutions in 2022. Here, we describe the mission of GOAL, its structure, and the outcomes and projects undertaken in its first years.

Pathology residency programs vary greatly across the United States. To the authors’ knowledge, little is formally known about the “phenotype” or career pathways of pathology residency program directors (PDs). PDs, former PDs (FPDs), and associate PDs (APDs) were surveyed, aiming to address whether or not dominant phenotypes or pathways to graduate medical education leadership exist. Several trends emerged including: 76% Whites, 70% females, 15% MD/PhDs, and more junior faculty (33% being <5 years in practice, another 24% being in practice <10 years, and 41% assistant professors at time of first PD/APD appointment). Anatomic and clinical pathology-certified individuals represented 79%. Sixty-two percent of respondents were on a nontenure employment track, with only 18% indicating tenure track. For subspecialty focus, cytopathology (25%), transfusion medicine (16%), and hematopathology (14%) represented the most common subspecialties practiced. A majority (65%) had served as a chief resident during residency, and most (61%) of PDs had served as APDs first. Most (60%) had not served as fellowship director. Most (65%) had not participated in any education leadership training, with 27% having participated in certificate programs or other educational professional development. Thematic analysis of perceived key criterion in selection for the role was passion for education, demeanor, emotional intelligence, and willingness to serve the department. This information may influence training or experience pursued by individuals aspiring to pathology graduate medical education leadership, inform chairs on qualities to look for, and supplement future educational sessions of the Association of Pathology Chairs Program Directors Council.