Pub Date : 2024-01-09DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2298469
Charlotte Hedenstierna-jonson
Published in Norwegian Archaeological Review (Ahead of Print, 2024)
发表于《挪威考古评论》（2024 年提前出版）
{"title":"A Viking Century. Chernihiv area from 900 to 1000 AD","authors":"Charlotte Hedenstierna-jonson","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2298469","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2298469","url":null,"abstract":"Published in Norwegian Archaeological Review (Ahead of Print, 2024)","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"256 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139410238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-07DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2298456
Mirja Arnshav
{"title":"Theorizing archaeological Museum studies. From artefact to exhibitMonika Stobiecka:\u0000 Theorizing archaeological Museum studies. From artefact to exhibit\u0000 . Routledge, Abingdon, 2023. 172 pp. ISBN: 978-1-032-35653-2","authors":"Mirja Arnshav","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2298456","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2298456","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139448218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-10DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2261941
Louise Felding
This paper introduces the concept of multi-locality as a relational approach to past gendered mobility and identities. Multi-local individuals are identified through strontium isotope analyses when...
{"title":"Tropes and Isotopes: A Relational Approach to Mobility in the Nordic Bronze Age","authors":"Louise Felding","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2261941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2261941","url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces the concept of multi-locality as a relational approach to past gendered mobility and identities. Multi-local individuals are identified through strontium isotope analyses when...","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138567325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-26DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2262463
Anette Strand-Eriksen
With the concept of affordance at its core and a method developed to assess settlement site locations using GIS, this paper aims to provide an improved and more nuanced understanding of the placeme...
{"title":"Exploring Affordances: Late Neolithic and Bronze Age Settlement Locations and Human-Environment Engagements in Southeast Norway","authors":"Anette Strand-Eriksen","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2262463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2262463","url":null,"abstract":"With the concept of affordance at its core and a method developed to assess settlement site locations using GIS, this paper aims to provide an improved and more nuanced understanding of the placeme...","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138534427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-24DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2278769
Hannah Cobb
{"title":"Archaeology at Home. Notes on Things, Life and TimeHein B. Bjerck: Archaeology at Home. Notes on Things, Life and Time . Equinox, Sheffield, 2022. 213 pp. ISBN 978-1-80050072-3","authors":"Hannah Cobb","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2278769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2278769","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"62 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139238466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2261945
Tiziana Gallo, Craig N. Cipolla
AbstractThe typologies that archaeologists use to classify artefacts and situate them chronologically and culturally are crucial tools of the discipline but; when left unquestioned, however, they tend to produce reductive and essentializing understandings of the past. Like all theoretical interventions, assemblage theory questions the unquestioned, in this case, asking archaeologists to radically rethink the relationality of the world and the power and vibrancy of nonhuman and nonliving things like stone. In this article, we take an assemblage-based approach to an old typological problem – sorting birdstones. Since the mid-19th century, collectors and archaeologists categorized birdstones found throughout the American Northeast according to evolutionary or culture-historical principles. These approaches paid little attention to different varieties of stone, often regarding birdstones as if they were passive reflections of normative mindsets that came in only three culture-specific types. Here, we explore how archaeologists might ‘reassemble’ typological thought, analysing and thinking through a large sample of materially varied birdstones to find much more than three little birds. Recognizing how the shared and specific capacities of different stones actively contributed to the multiplicity of birdstone morphologies resituates them as singular and changing assemblages while highlighting the potentials of questioning the fixity of both typological and material categories at large. AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the editorial staff of Norwegian Archaeological Review, two anonymous peer reviewers for offering helpful suggestions on how to improve the article, and Dr Justin Jennings and April Hawkins of the Royal Ontario Museum, Archaeology of the Americas Department, for supporting their research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This sample excludes all birdstones that are from known burial contexts and those whose shaping traces indicate possible forgery.2 This total includes all different eye-base-feet groupings. It however does not consider the presence of illusory eyes (which would bring the total of groupings up to 46) and excludes birdstone preforms and birdstones with missing or incomplete eyes or bases.Additional informationFundingTiziana Gallo’s research is supported by a Rebanks Postdoctoral Fellowship in Ontario Archaeology.
{"title":"Three Little Birds: Reassembling Typological Thought","authors":"Tiziana Gallo, Craig N. Cipolla","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2261945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2261945","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe typologies that archaeologists use to classify artefacts and situate them chronologically and culturally are crucial tools of the discipline but; when left unquestioned, however, they tend to produce reductive and essentializing understandings of the past. Like all theoretical interventions, assemblage theory questions the unquestioned, in this case, asking archaeologists to radically rethink the relationality of the world and the power and vibrancy of nonhuman and nonliving things like stone. In this article, we take an assemblage-based approach to an old typological problem – sorting birdstones. Since the mid-19th century, collectors and archaeologists categorized birdstones found throughout the American Northeast according to evolutionary or culture-historical principles. These approaches paid little attention to different varieties of stone, often regarding birdstones as if they were passive reflections of normative mindsets that came in only three culture-specific types. Here, we explore how archaeologists might ‘reassemble’ typological thought, analysing and thinking through a large sample of materially varied birdstones to find much more than three little birds. Recognizing how the shared and specific capacities of different stones actively contributed to the multiplicity of birdstone morphologies resituates them as singular and changing assemblages while highlighting the potentials of questioning the fixity of both typological and material categories at large. AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the editorial staff of Norwegian Archaeological Review, two anonymous peer reviewers for offering helpful suggestions on how to improve the article, and Dr Justin Jennings and April Hawkins of the Royal Ontario Museum, Archaeology of the Americas Department, for supporting their research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This sample excludes all birdstones that are from known burial contexts and those whose shaping traces indicate possible forgery.2 This total includes all different eye-base-feet groupings. It however does not consider the presence of illusory eyes (which would bring the total of groupings up to 46) and excludes birdstone preforms and birdstones with missing or incomplete eyes or bases.Additional informationFundingTiziana Gallo’s research is supported by a Rebanks Postdoctoral Fellowship in Ontario Archaeology.","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"284 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135475208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-31DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2268085
Vinita Chandra, Akash Kumar Srivastava
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
点击放大图片点击缩小图片披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。
{"title":"Cooking with plants in Ancient Europe and beyond. Interdisciplinary approaches to the archaeology of plant foods <b>Cooking with plants in Ancient Europe and beyond. Interdisciplinary approaches to the archaeology of plant foods</b> , edited by Soultana Maria Valamoti, Anastasia Dimoula & Maria Ntinou, 2022, 530 pp., Leiden, Sidestone Press, € 170 (hardback), ISBN 9789464270341","authors":"Vinita Chandra, Akash Kumar Srivastava","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2268085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2268085","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135808552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-02DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2210579
T. Sørensen
{"title":"Insignificants – Speculative Fabulations for the Incidental and Useless","authors":"T. Sørensen","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2210579","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2210579","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44191419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2023.2203133
N. Tiwari
The influence of colonial legacy on the scholarly work of the European Mesolithic has been represented in this paper by Elliot and Warren. Their take on this subject within the myriad of Decolonisation thought is wellresearched. They entangle the histories of colonial subjugation in the European Mesolithic by carefully examining the fundamentalswhy, how, and who (suggested by Graeme Warren in a discussion). This train of thought helps us understand why decolonisation is necessary, how it has and does affect the current scholarship on Mesolithic, and whom it affects. Elliot and Warren dive into the previously unknown deep waters of Mesolithic archaeology in the European scenario and weigh the consequences of the colonial thought process in Mesolithic archaeology globally. The present paper by the authors is an outcome of the long ongoing debates within the broader community of hunter-gatherer studies. This includes the scholars working with the indigenous communities and the archaeologists working in Mesolithic archaeology. As explained in the paper, specific dialogue on ‘Decolonising the Mesolithic’ began with the workshop on this topic that the authors organised in May of 2021. Before understanding the use of the term ‘Mesolithic culture’ worldwide, the necessity to explain and unhinge the European scenario is somehow the spine of this whole project. The deep-rooted use of this term has to be questioned, and Elliot and Warren, in this paper, rightly target such a sensitive issue with factual information. The term Mesolithic is frequently used loosely and globally and is attached to the tool typemicroliths, which were produced largely from Late Pleistocene to the Late Holocene period. The occurrence and production of this tool type are spatiotemporally varied globally. However, the nomenclature denoted to this phasei.e. Mesolithicis used and applied in the countries under colonial rule. Elliot and Warren pointed out the origin of this term, its definition, and its apt use in Northern Europe, and they also state that this term is by far not inclusive for the whole of the European continent. Beginning with the basis of this research, the authors start by explaining decolonisation and whether it impacts our daily lives in academic research and for them as educators. Looking at decolonisation through a macro lens, they try to understand it in university-level teaching by following Pimblott’s (2020) and Bruchac’s (2014). They point out the universities’ Eurocentric approach towards assessing indigenous populations’ cultures and traditions. Such repertoire must be dismantled to listen to
{"title":"An Exposition on Colonialism and the European Mesolithic by Benjamin Elliott and Graeme Warren","authors":"N. Tiwari","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2023.2203133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2023.2203133","url":null,"abstract":"The influence of colonial legacy on the scholarly work of the European Mesolithic has been represented in this paper by Elliot and Warren. Their take on this subject within the myriad of Decolonisation thought is wellresearched. They entangle the histories of colonial subjugation in the European Mesolithic by carefully examining the fundamentalswhy, how, and who (suggested by Graeme Warren in a discussion). This train of thought helps us understand why decolonisation is necessary, how it has and does affect the current scholarship on Mesolithic, and whom it affects. Elliot and Warren dive into the previously unknown deep waters of Mesolithic archaeology in the European scenario and weigh the consequences of the colonial thought process in Mesolithic archaeology globally. The present paper by the authors is an outcome of the long ongoing debates within the broader community of hunter-gatherer studies. This includes the scholars working with the indigenous communities and the archaeologists working in Mesolithic archaeology. As explained in the paper, specific dialogue on ‘Decolonising the Mesolithic’ began with the workshop on this topic that the authors organised in May of 2021. Before understanding the use of the term ‘Mesolithic culture’ worldwide, the necessity to explain and unhinge the European scenario is somehow the spine of this whole project. The deep-rooted use of this term has to be questioned, and Elliot and Warren, in this paper, rightly target such a sensitive issue with factual information. The term Mesolithic is frequently used loosely and globally and is attached to the tool typemicroliths, which were produced largely from Late Pleistocene to the Late Holocene period. The occurrence and production of this tool type are spatiotemporally varied globally. However, the nomenclature denoted to this phasei.e. Mesolithicis used and applied in the countries under colonial rule. Elliot and Warren pointed out the origin of this term, its definition, and its apt use in Northern Europe, and they also state that this term is by far not inclusive for the whole of the European continent. Beginning with the basis of this research, the authors start by explaining decolonisation and whether it impacts our daily lives in academic research and for them as educators. Looking at decolonisation through a macro lens, they try to understand it in university-level teaching by following Pimblott’s (2020) and Bruchac’s (2014). They point out the universities’ Eurocentric approach towards assessing indigenous populations’ cultures and traditions. Such repertoire must be dismantled to listen to","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":"56 1","pages":"90 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42404697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：