The concerted efforts in recent years to change the division of care responsibilities currently shouldered by women and the quest to establish a new balance among providers of care — the family, the market, and the state — have topped the social policy agenda in many contexts. These attempts are based on the well-established fact that women ’ s caring responsibilities profoundly affect their labor market participation. Feminist researchers have modeled the welfare states as to their response to meet the care needs of families. Lewis ’ s (1992) male breadwinner model in which women bear the sole responsibility for domestic tasks and child care, and remain outside labor markets presents the most widespread model of care in the world. However, it was later modified to include variations of the one-and-a-half breadwinner and dual earner household models. In Sainsbury ’ s (1994) model, welfare states are typologies, whether they support women as wives, mothers, or workers. Orloff (1993) sets the criteria to evaluate the gender welfare regime according to whether it enables a woman to move out and set up her own home. In addition, Jensen (1997) suggests a focus on care, rather than on work/welfare, and makes distinctions between three sets of questions: Who cares? Who pays? How much is provided? These various mod-els all have a focus on the relationship between the structure of the welfare state and women ’ s paid work, and explain the role of the state in determining women ’ s economic activities. More recently, gender analysis has focused on how increasing rates of female employment have affected care and welfare regimes worldwide. For example, Esping analyzes the “ new gender contract ” that has emerged in post-industrial societies in which women-friendly policies and child-centered social investment have resulted in the disappearance of housewifery as well as institutional developments in labor market regulation and social policy.
{"title":"Special dossier editor’s introduction Gender, care, and work in Turkey: from familialism to neo-paternalism","authors":"S. Dedeoğlu","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.11","url":null,"abstract":"The concerted efforts in recent years to change the division of care responsibilities currently shouldered by women and the quest to establish a new balance among providers of care — the family, the market, and the state — have topped the social policy agenda in many contexts. These attempts are based on the well-established fact that women ’ s caring responsibilities profoundly affect their labor market participation. Feminist researchers have modeled the welfare states as to their response to meet the care needs of families. Lewis ’ s (1992) male breadwinner model in which women bear the sole responsibility for domestic tasks and child care, and remain outside labor markets presents the most widespread model of care in the world. However, it was later modified to include variations of the one-and-a-half breadwinner and dual earner household models. In Sainsbury ’ s (1994) model, welfare states are typologies, whether they support women as wives, mothers, or workers. Orloff (1993) sets the criteria to evaluate the gender welfare regime according to whether it enables a woman to move out and set up her own home. In addition, Jensen (1997) suggests a focus on care, rather than on work/welfare, and makes distinctions between three sets of questions: Who cares? Who pays? How much is provided? These various mod-els all have a focus on the relationship between the structure of the welfare state and women ’ s paid work, and explain the role of the state in determining women ’ s economic activities. More recently, gender analysis has focused on how increasing rates of female employment have affected care and welfare regimes worldwide. For example, Esping analyzes the “ new gender contract ” that has emerged in post-industrial societies in which women-friendly policies and child-centered social investment have resulted in the disappearance of housewifery as well as institutional developments in labor market regulation and social policy.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"4 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48312870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The aging population and, along with it, increasing long-term care needs create pressure globally on the social and health care spending of governments under the constraint of shrinking tax bases. The common tendency of governments is to minimize the cost by transferring the elderly care burden to families. However, care provision comes with penalties for caretakers in the form of potential income losses and a rising, unpaid workload that requires a gender-based assessment. These impacts intensify with additional demographic trends that impose new challenges. Increasing longevity accompanied by decreasing fertility and delays in having children in Turkey have contributed to the growth of the “sandwiched generation” which encounters the care needs of their elderly as they care for their children. This study investigates whether and how caring responsibilities can be associated with the caregivers’ economic participation in Turkey, where the retreat from institutional provisioning of elderly care services is concealed with a neoconservative family-oriented rhetoric. Using the 2014–2015 Time Use Statistics compiled by TurkStat, we analyze the relationship between informal elderly care provision and employment hours, taking into account the potential impact of providing elderly care on labor force participation, focusing on sandwiched- generation women.
{"title":"Impact of elderly care on “sandwiched-generation” women in Turkey","authors":"Özge İzdeş Terkoğlu, Emel Memiş","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.12","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aging population and, along with it, increasing long-term care needs create pressure globally on the social and health care spending of governments under the constraint of shrinking tax bases. The common tendency of governments is to minimize the cost by transferring the elderly care burden to families. However, care provision comes with penalties for caretakers in the form of potential income losses and a rising, unpaid workload that requires a gender-based assessment. These impacts intensify with additional demographic trends that impose new challenges. Increasing longevity accompanied by decreasing fertility and delays in having children in Turkey have contributed to the growth of the “sandwiched generation” which encounters the care needs of their elderly as they care for their children. This study investigates whether and how caring responsibilities can be associated with the caregivers’ economic participation in Turkey, where the retreat from institutional provisioning of elderly care services is concealed with a neoconservative family-oriented rhetoric. Using the 2014–2015 Time Use Statistics compiled by TurkStat, we analyze the relationship between informal elderly care provision and employment hours, taking into account the potential impact of providing elderly care on labor force participation, focusing on sandwiched- generation women.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"88 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48239335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract In the 1950s and 1960s, Europe was a popular migration destination for Turkish people due to its employment opportunities. Today, however, these labor market drivers of migration destinations in the EU-28 have been superseded. This article empirically investigates the drivers of the migration destinations of Turkish newcomers to EU countries between 2008–2018. It contributes to the literature by focusing only on Turkish newcomers, whereas other studies rely on migration stock data. Using data provided by the OECD, Eurostat, and the World Bank, the findings show that security-based and social drivers mostly attract Turkish newcomers to EU-28 destinations, specifically a demand for democracy and social networks.
{"title":"The European Union as a destination of Turkish migrants in 2008–2018","authors":"Selda Dudu, Teresa Rojo","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.4","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the 1950s and 1960s, Europe was a popular migration destination for Turkish people due to its employment opportunities. Today, however, these labor market drivers of migration destinations in the EU-28 have been superseded. This article empirically investigates the drivers of the migration destinations of Turkish newcomers to EU countries between 2008–2018. It contributes to the literature by focusing only on Turkish newcomers, whereas other studies rely on migration stock data. Using data provided by the OECD, Eurostat, and the World Bank, the findings show that security-based and social drivers mostly attract Turkish newcomers to EU-28 destinations, specifically a demand for democracy and social networks.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"140 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46208086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aral, Nazlı Eray, Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, Yusuf Atılgan, Peyami Safa, Oğuz Atay, and Orhan Pamuk) also reflect a cursory diversity. They are top-notch secular writers of the Turkish literary canon, critics of Kemalism at times, but still to a great extent supporters of the Republican ideals, and there is also “a certain degree of Eurocentricism” (p. 17) in their works. Almond refers, for example, to Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar’s devotion to French literature. He considers Yusuf Atılgan’s “critique of Kemalist project” as “a secular attack upon the secular” (p. 57). In other words, this book is a successful challenge to theWest-centeredWorld Literary canon, but it leaves a powerful question mark in terms of the challenge to be performed locally and against the national canons. Almond is aware of this shortcoming in the focal interest of the book; that is why he says, in the Introduction, that he fights “one battle at a time” (p. 20). He discusses the problem of diversity in local literatures in the Methodology section of the book and, in the context of the literary panorama of Turkey, he refers to Kurdish writers who refuse to write in Turkish, bilingual authors who use both languages, and he also reminds us of the “slow but steady” (p. 18) call by literary critics and historians in Turkey on Armenian writers. In this section, there are also references to indigenous writers within Mexican literature, and Dalit and Muslim writers in Bengali literature to stress the diversity of the local literatures that are the target of this book. The added emphasis that “we have to collude with local hegemonies regionally” (p. 20) as well, issues an invitation to scholars worldwide to further the project of this book. In a valid final note, Almond says that “the politics of representation is often an inclusive project, not a revolutionary one” (p.220), which is a powerful reminder that skindeep diversity in representation will simply not lead us to democratization, as it will inescapably end up being an affirmation of the status quo. World Literature Decentered: Beyond the “West” through Turkey, Mexico and Bengalmakes it manifest that for this challenge to turn into a revolutionary project, an internalized mentality of collectivity is required all around the globe.
{"title":"Rebecca Bryant and Mete Hatay, Sovereignty Suspended: Building the So-Called State. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020. xviii + 324 pp.","authors":"Ozancan Bozkurt","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.7","url":null,"abstract":"Aral, Nazlı Eray, Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, Yusuf Atılgan, Peyami Safa, Oğuz Atay, and Orhan Pamuk) also reflect a cursory diversity. They are top-notch secular writers of the Turkish literary canon, critics of Kemalism at times, but still to a great extent supporters of the Republican ideals, and there is also “a certain degree of Eurocentricism” (p. 17) in their works. Almond refers, for example, to Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar’s devotion to French literature. He considers Yusuf Atılgan’s “critique of Kemalist project” as “a secular attack upon the secular” (p. 57). In other words, this book is a successful challenge to theWest-centeredWorld Literary canon, but it leaves a powerful question mark in terms of the challenge to be performed locally and against the national canons. Almond is aware of this shortcoming in the focal interest of the book; that is why he says, in the Introduction, that he fights “one battle at a time” (p. 20). He discusses the problem of diversity in local literatures in the Methodology section of the book and, in the context of the literary panorama of Turkey, he refers to Kurdish writers who refuse to write in Turkish, bilingual authors who use both languages, and he also reminds us of the “slow but steady” (p. 18) call by literary critics and historians in Turkey on Armenian writers. In this section, there are also references to indigenous writers within Mexican literature, and Dalit and Muslim writers in Bengali literature to stress the diversity of the local literatures that are the target of this book. The added emphasis that “we have to collude with local hegemonies regionally” (p. 20) as well, issues an invitation to scholars worldwide to further the project of this book. In a valid final note, Almond says that “the politics of representation is often an inclusive project, not a revolutionary one” (p.220), which is a powerful reminder that skindeep diversity in representation will simply not lead us to democratization, as it will inescapably end up being an affirmation of the status quo. World Literature Decentered: Beyond the “West” through Turkey, Mexico and Bengalmakes it manifest that for this challenge to turn into a revolutionary project, an internalized mentality of collectivity is required all around the globe.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"202 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47343692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This article contributes to the literature on rural politics in Turkey by investigating peasants’ land occupations between 1965 and 1980. We show that agricultural modernization after 1945 created the structural conditions for land conflicts by enabling the reaching of the frontier of cultivable land and facilitating landlords’ displacement of tenants. The 1961 Constitution’s promise of land reform and the rise of the center-left and socialist politics helped peasants press for land reform by combining direct action and legalistic discourse. Moreover, the vastness of state-owned land and the incompleteness of cadastral records allowed peasants to challenge landlords’ ownership claims. During land occupations, villagers often claimed that contested areas were public property illegally encroached upon by landlords, and that the state was constitutionally obliged to distribute it to peasants. Although successive right-wing governments decreed these actions to be intolerable violations of property rights, their practical approach was more flexible and conciliatory. Although nationwide land reform was never realized, land occupations extracted considerable concessions via the distribution of public land and inexpensive land sold by landlords.
{"title":"Land occupation as a form of peasant struggle in Turkey, 1965–1980","authors":"Burak Gürel, Bermal Küçük, S. Taş","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.3","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article contributes to the literature on rural politics in Turkey by investigating peasants’ land occupations between 1965 and 1980. We show that agricultural modernization after 1945 created the structural conditions for land conflicts by enabling the reaching of the frontier of cultivable land and facilitating landlords’ displacement of tenants. The 1961 Constitution’s promise of land reform and the rise of the center-left and socialist politics helped peasants press for land reform by combining direct action and legalistic discourse. Moreover, the vastness of state-owned land and the incompleteness of cadastral records allowed peasants to challenge landlords’ ownership claims. During land occupations, villagers often claimed that contested areas were public property illegally encroached upon by landlords, and that the state was constitutionally obliged to distribute it to peasants. Although successive right-wing governments decreed these actions to be intolerable violations of property rights, their practical approach was more flexible and conciliatory. Although nationwide land reform was never realized, land occupations extracted considerable concessions via the distribution of public land and inexpensive land sold by landlords.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"67 1","pages":"4 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41920676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
nationalmemory fromthe perspective of different narratives of incompatibility between Greeks and Turks. They present questions of identity and boundaries between religions, languages, and ethnic communities during the period of the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. In the epilogue, Willert summarizes and compares the old and new narratives on the Ottoman heritage in Greek history since the late 1990s. Consequently, the book reveals how the historical and fictional narratives played a role in reaching out to a large populationwithmessages for thereimaginationof the“self”andthe“other”andprovideabetter understanding of how the Ottoman past is slowly and steadily becoming an integral part of Greek collective historical consciousness. In this historical account, she discusses how thesenew interpretations reflect thenation’spresent, theself-definitionofnational identity in terms of beingmodern and European, or including a non-European past. However, one issue she does not sufficiently address is the contributions of the Western Thracian Turks in this emergence of a New Ottoman Greece. Nonetheless, the nexus of the book is Greek narratives. Having said that, this book will be valuable for both those looking for a new perspective on the debates of the Ottoman heritage in Greece as well as academics and laypeople.
{"title":"Christopher Houston. Istanbul, City of the Fearless: Urban Activism, Coup D’état, and Memory in Turkey. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2020. 242 pp.","authors":"Azat Zana Gündoğan","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.6","url":null,"abstract":"nationalmemory fromthe perspective of different narratives of incompatibility between Greeks and Turks. They present questions of identity and boundaries between religions, languages, and ethnic communities during the period of the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. In the epilogue, Willert summarizes and compares the old and new narratives on the Ottoman heritage in Greek history since the late 1990s. Consequently, the book reveals how the historical and fictional narratives played a role in reaching out to a large populationwithmessages for thereimaginationof the“self”andthe“other”andprovideabetter understanding of how the Ottoman past is slowly and steadily becoming an integral part of Greek collective historical consciousness. In this historical account, she discusses how thesenew interpretations reflect thenation’spresent, theself-definitionofnational identity in terms of beingmodern and European, or including a non-European past. However, one issue she does not sufficiently address is the contributions of the Western Thracian Turks in this emergence of a New Ottoman Greece. Nonetheless, the nexus of the book is Greek narratives. Having said that, this book will be valuable for both those looking for a new perspective on the debates of the Ottoman heritage in Greece as well as academics and laypeople.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"196 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46343201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Since the rise of the ruling Justice and Development Party in the early 2000s, Turkey has invested in several mega transport and infrastructure projects for the purposes of economic transformation, growth, and development. This article explores the impact of a recently completed mega-project—the Osman Gazi Bridge—on material change and popular imagination about the future. It claims that, while the Bridge created a colossal material change that can be observed by everyone, it also animated an imagined post-industrial transition and inclusive development in the industrial town of Dilovası. Although the dream of a better future serves as a medium for the industrial town’s underprivileged inhabitants to connect and socialize, along with the current marginalizing conditions, it also has the potential to fuel future resistance, if imagination is unable to be transformed into reality.
自21世纪初执政的正义与发展党(Justice and Development Party)上台以来，土耳其投资了几个大型交通和基础设施项目，以实现经济转型、增长和发展。本文探讨了最近完工的大型工程奥斯曼加齐大桥对材料变化和大众对未来想象的影响。它声称，虽然这座桥创造了一个巨大的物质变化，每个人都可以观察到，它也激发了想象中的后工业转型和工业城镇迪洛瓦斯基的包容性发展。虽然美好未来的梦想是工业城镇贫困居民联系和社交的媒介，但随着目前的边缘化状况，如果想象无法转化为现实，它也有可能加剧未来的抵抗。
{"title":"Alienated imagination through a mega development project in Turkey: the case of the Osman Gazi Bridge","authors":"Deniz Ş. Sert, Umut Kuruüzüm","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.2","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the rise of the ruling Justice and Development Party in the early 2000s, Turkey has invested in several mega transport and infrastructure projects for the purposes of economic transformation, growth, and development. This article explores the impact of a recently completed mega-project—the Osman Gazi Bridge—on material change and popular imagination about the future. It claims that, while the Bridge created a colossal material change that can be observed by everyone, it also animated an imagined post-industrial transition and inclusive development in the industrial town of Dilovası. Although the dream of a better future serves as a medium for the industrial town’s underprivileged inhabitants to connect and socialize, along with the current marginalizing conditions, it also has the potential to fuel future resistance, if imagination is unable to be transformed into reality.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"160 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42809419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract In Infancy and History Agamben (1993) suggests, following Benjamin’s footsteps, that true experience is only possible in infancy, a time that has not yet been expropriated by the bareness of modern life. The kind of potentiality that he attributes to infancy signifies the emergence of a new self, which, rather than moving into the mechanical domain of “work,” prefers to remain in the creative territory of “play,” where it is possible to transform old societal structures into new ones. Agamben’s approach to play and its non-chronological temporality offers useful clues in revealing the dynamics of the increasing number of contemporary childhood narratives in Irish and Turkish literature, where characters resist the linear structure of the bildungsroman and the corresponding model of progress, eventually forming a culture of adolescents resistant to maturity. Focusing on some common features of these novelistic characters, such as playfulness, self-experimentation, and messianic idealism, this paper argues that the return of children to contemporary Turkish and Irish novel opens a new terrain of possibilities that offer liberation from the poverty of experience Agamben attributes to modern society.
{"title":"The return of children: a comparative study on the contemporary Turkish and Irish novel","authors":"Meltem Gürle","doi":"10.1017/npt.2021.35","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2021.35","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Infancy and History Agamben (1993) suggests, following Benjamin’s footsteps, that true experience is only possible in infancy, a time that has not yet been expropriated by the bareness of modern life. The kind of potentiality that he attributes to infancy signifies the emergence of a new self, which, rather than moving into the mechanical domain of “work,” prefers to remain in the creative territory of “play,” where it is possible to transform old societal structures into new ones. Agamben’s approach to play and its non-chronological temporality offers useful clues in revealing the dynamics of the increasing number of contemporary childhood narratives in Irish and Turkish literature, where characters resist the linear structure of the bildungsroman and the corresponding model of progress, eventually forming a culture of adolescents resistant to maturity. Focusing on some common features of these novelistic characters, such as playfulness, self-experimentation, and messianic idealism, this paper argues that the return of children to contemporary Turkish and Irish novel opens a new terrain of possibilities that offer liberation from the poverty of experience Agamben attributes to modern society.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"122 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46419239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ian Almond. World Literature Decentered: Beyond the “West” through Turkey, Mexico and Bengal. New York: Routledge, 2022. xiv + 249 pp.","authors":"Çimen Günay-Erkol","doi":"10.1017/npt.2022.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"200 - 202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43380822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trine Stauning Willert, The New Ottoman Greece in History and Fiction. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, xiii + 223 pp.","authors":"Filiz Çoban Oran","doi":"10.1017/npt.2021.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2021.34","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"66 1","pages":"194 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47390939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：